DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Analysis of Co-Operative Sectors in Scotland, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative Analysis of Co-Operative Sectors in Scotland, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland "DPNQBSBUJWFBOBMZTJTPG DPPQFSBUJWFTFDUPSTJO4DPUMBOE 'JOMBOE 4XFEFOBOE4XJU[FSMBOE "VUIPS+PIOTUPO#JSDIBMM /PWFNCFS A comparative analysis of co-operative sectors in Scotland, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland CONTENTS WHO WE ARE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 WHAT WE OFFER.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Author profile........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgements..............................................................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................................................6 Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................................10 How to classify co-operatives.........................................................................................................................................................................10 A general comparison of the four countries................................................................................................................................................11 What explains the differences?.......................................................................................................................................................................12 Chapter 2: CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES: RETAIL .......................................................................................................................................17 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................17 Consumer Co-operatives: Retail - Switzerland.............................................................................................................................................17 Consumer Co-operatives: Retail - Sweden ....................................................................................................................................................18 Consumer Co-operatives: Retail - Finland.....................................................................................................................................................19 Consumer Co-operatives: Retail - Scotland ..................................................................................................................................................20 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................................................................22 Chapter 3: CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES: FINANCIAL SERVICES.............................................................................................................23 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Consumer Co-operatives: Financial Services - Switzerland.......................................................................................................................24 Consumer Co-operatives: Financial Services - Finland...............................................................................................................................24 Consumer Co-operatives: Financial Services - Sweden ..............................................................................................................................25 Consumer Co-operatives: Financial Services - Scotland ............................................................................................................................25 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................................................................27 Chapter 4: CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES: HOUSING ..................................................................................................................................28 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................28 Consumer Co-operatives: Housing - Switzerland .......................................................................................................................................29 Consumer Co-operatives: Housing - Sweden...............................................................................................................................................29 Consumer Co-operatives: Housing - Finland ...............................................................................................................................................30 Consumer Co-operatives: Housing - Scotland.............................................................................................................................................30 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................................................................31 Chapter 5: CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES: UTILITIES....................................................................................................................................32 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................32 Consumer Co-operatives: Utilities - Switzerland .........................................................................................................................................32 1 A comparative analysis of co-operative sectors in Scotland, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland Consumer Co-operatives: Utilities - Finland .................................................................................................................................................33 Consumer Co-operatives: Utilities - Denmark..............................................................................................................................................33 Consumer Co-operatives: Utilities - Scotland...............................................................................................................................................34 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................................................................35 Chapter 6: CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES: LEISURE SERVICES..................................................................................................................36 Chapter 7: CONSUMER CO-OPERATIVES: PUBLIC SERVICES....................................................................................................................37 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................37 Consumer Co-operatives: Public Services - Sweden....................................................................................................................................37 Consumer Co-operatives: Public Services - Scotland..................................................................................................................................38 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................................................................39 Chapter 8: PRODUCER CO-OPERATIVES: FARMING AND FORESTRY.....................................................................................................40 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................................................40 Producer Co-operatives: Farming and Forestry - Switzerland .................................................................................................................41 Producer Co-operatives: Farming and Forestry - Sweden.........................................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Do We Really Know About Worker Co-Operatives?
    What do we really know about worker co-operatives? Virginie Pérotin Icon or graphic 2 What do we really know about Worker Co-operatives? Virginie Pérotin is Professor of Economics at Leeds University Business School and specialises in the effects of firm ownership and governance on performance, worker co-operatives, employee ownership and profit sharing. Previous academic and research roles include positions at the International Labour Office, the London School of Economics and the Centre d’Etude des Revenus et des Coûts (CERC) in the French Prime Minister’s Office in Paris. Professor Pérotin has also acted as a consultant to the European Commission, World Bank and OECD on issues of profit-sharing, employee ownership and employee involvement schemes. Executive summary The idea that employees can run their own firms might sound unrealistic to some. This study looks at international data on worker-owned and run businesses in Europe, the US and Latin America and compares them with conventional businesses. It also reviews international statistical studies on the firms’ productivity, survival, investment and responsiveness. It finds that worker co-operatives represent a serious business alternative and bring significant benefits to their employees and to the economy. There are thousands of worker-run businesses in Europe, employing several hundred thousand people in a broad range of industries, from traditional manufacturing to the creative and high-tech industries. Because worker co-operatives are owned and run by them, employees in worker-owned co-operatives have far more say in the business, from day-to-day concerns through to major strategic issues. The largest study comparing the productivity of worker co-operatives with that of conventional businesses finds that in several industries, conventional companies would produce more with their current levels of employment and capital if they behaved like employee-owned firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Egalitarian Core of the Internet
    International Journal of Communications Law & Policy Special Issue Global Flow of Information, Autumn 2005 GOVERNING THE EGALITARIAN CORE OF THE INTERNET ∗ By Christoph Engel ∗∗ ABSTRACT Few would claim that regulators, or academics working on regulatory policy, have neglected the Internet. However, most of their work is attracted by the global character of the Internet. Admit- tedly, this is a serious challenge to regulation, but it is not the only, and probably not even the most disquieting one. In the regulatory discourse, short shrift is given to the fact that the Internet originated in the egalitarian culture of American university computer labs. Its architecture was shaped during that period. Up to the present day, many key functions for Internet management are held by people coming from that culture. This paper argues that the egalitarian challenge to Internet governance has been largely over- looked. The challenge is serious, but not unmanageable. Nevertheless, regulators must use appro- priate concepts to understand the challenge. A subfield of sociology, cultural theory, is particularly instrumental for that purpose. In order to address the challenge, regulators must use a set of gov- ernance tools that deviates considerably from standard regulatory responses. INTRODUCTION The Problem Regulators are not good at multi-tasking. Admittedly, no one would claim that regulators have neglected the Internet. After all, there is a flurry of regulatory activity all over the world, 1 and an almost intractable amount of academic work on Internet-related subjects. 2 Most of this work is driven by the global character of the Internet. Admittedly, this poses a serious challenge to regulation,3 but it is not the only one, and probably not even the most disquieting one.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Acquisition by Co-Operative Foodstores Limited of Eight My Local Grocery Stores from ML Convenience Limited and MLCG Limited
    Completed acquisition by Co-operative Foodstores Limited of eight My Local grocery stores from ML Convenience Limited and MLCG Limited Decision on relevant merger situation and substantial lessening of competition ME/6625/16 The CMA’s decision on reference under section 22(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 given on 19 October 2016. Full text of the decision published on 10 November 2016. Please note that [] indicates figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. CONTENTS Page SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 2 ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 3 Parties ................................................................................................................... 3 Transaction ........................................................................................................... 4 Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................ 4 Counterfactual....................................................................................................... 5 Frame of reference ............................................................................................... 7 Competitive assessment ..................................................................................... 11 Third party views ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Seeds Merchants, Processors and Packers
    PUBLIC REGISTER SCOTTISH SEEDS MERCHANTS, PROCESSORS AND PACKERS December 2014 SASA - A Division of the Scottish Government Agriculture, Food and Rural Communities Directorate Page 1 of 19 Name & Address Category Responsible Person Contact ACT Scotland Ltd. M Iain Davidson Email: Rosehall [email protected] TURRIFF Phone: 01888 569586 Aberdeenshire, AB53 4PT Phone: 01888 569585 Fax: 01888 569502 Agri Input Direct Ltd. M Lawson Galloway Email: [email protected] Moorpark Of Baldoon Phone: 01988 840385 Kirkinner Fax: 01988 840034 NEWTON STEWART Wigtownshire, DG8 9BY Agrii M Roger Sherriff Email: Glenearn Road [email protected] PERTH Phone: 01738 623201 Perthshire, PH2 0NL Fax: 01738 630360 Agrii M Neil Ross Phone: 01738 555400 Balboughty Farm Old Scone PERTH Perthshire, PH2 6AA Agrii M Gordon Stewart Email: [email protected] Farm Office, Prospect Buildings Phone: 01975 563200 Montgarrie Phone: 07801 197502 ALFORD Fax: 01975 564259 Aberdeenshire, AB33 8BA Agrii M PR PA Brenda Hay Email: [email protected] Seed Plant Phone: 01888 569601 Rosehall Phone: 01888 569175 TURRIFF Fax: 01888 569140/148 Aberdeenshire, AB53 4HD Richard Aitken Seedsmen Ltd. M Richard Aitken Phone: 0141 440 0033 123 Harmony Row Phone: 0141 552 2597 GLASGOW Fax: 0141 440 2744 Lanarkshire, G51 3NB D O Allan M PR D O Allan Phone: 01330 833224/429 Tillycairn Cottage Phone: 01330 833429 Sauchen Fax: 01330 833429 INVERURIE Aberdeenshire, AB51 7RX Page 2 of 19 Name & Address Category Responsible Person Contact W C & A D Allan M PR PA A D Allan
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes of Consumers, Retailers and Producers to Farm Animal Welfare
    Attitudes of Consumers, Retailers and Producers to Farm Animal Welfare edited by Unni Kjærnes, Mara Miele and Joek Roex WELFARE QUALITY REPORTS NO. 2 This report is dedicated to the memory of Jonathan Murdoch. Welfare Quality Reports Edited by Mara Miele and Joek Roex School of City and Regional Planning Cardiff University Glamorgan Building King Edward VII Avenue Cardiff CF10 3WA Wales UK Tel.: +44(0)292087; fax: +44(0)2920874845; e-mail: [email protected] January 2007 The present study is part of the Welfare Quality research project which has been co- financed by the European Commission, within the 6th Framework Programme, contract No. FOOD-CT-2004-506508. The text represents the authors’ views and does not necessarily represent a position of the Commission who will not be liable for the use made of such information. © Copyright is with the authors of the individual contributions. ISBN 1-902647-73-4 ISSN 1749-5164 CONTENTS Preface iii PART I Farm Animal Welfare and Food Consumption Practices: Results from Surveys in Seven Countries (edited by Unni Kjærnes and Randi Lavik) 1 Introduction to Part I 1 2 Background and Research Questions 3 3 Methods 9 4 People Are Interested but Not Necessarily Worried 11 5 Considerations of Animal Friendliness When Purchasing Food 17 6 Availability Is a Bigger Problem Than Price 21 7 The Truth-telling of Institutional Actors 23 8 Concluding Remarks to Part I 29 PART II Analysis of the Retail Survey of Products that Carry Welfare-claims and of Non-retailer Led Assurance Schemes whose Logos Accompany Welfare-claims (edited by Emma Roe and Terry Marsden) 9 Introduction to Part II 33 10 Comparative Overview of Animal Welfare Claims 35 11 Welfare Bundling on Packaging 45 12 Comparative Analysis of Non-retailer Led Schemes of Production 51 13 Comparative Analysis of Marketing Schemes of Non-retailer Led 59 Assurance Schemes 14 Conclusions to Part II 65 PART III Pig Farmers and Animal Welfare: A Study of Beliefs, Attitudes and Behaviour of Pig Producers across Europe (edited by Bettina B.
    [Show full text]
  • Literatures a Color
    Study on the social enterprises ecosystem in Emilia-Romagna RaiSE Enhancing social enterprises competitiveness through improved business support policies This publication only reflects the author’s views. The programme authorities are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein Contents Summary 1. Definition and Criteria in the regional context 2. Characteristics and development of social enterprises 3. Needs assessment and main challenges for scaling social enterprises 4. Ecosystem of business support tools and instruments 5. Gap analysis and policy recommendations Annex 1 Interview Grid Annex 2 Summary of the Interviews Bibliography Sitography – enterprises involved in the mapping 1 SUMMARY This research project was carried out within the framework of the European RaiSE Interreg Europe project, whose objective is to improve regional policy instruments for the competitiveness and sustainability of social enterprises. The development agencies involved in the project - from Emilia-Romagna, Catalonia, Ireland, Scotland, Hungary (Budapest) and Orebro (Sweden) - mapped the economy and social entrepreneurship ecosystems in their respective regional contexts, bringing out a highly varied and interesting scenario. ERVET internal working group, in charge of mapping and analysing the needs of the Emilia-Romagna social cooperatives and enterprises, involved the regional project stakeholders (Emilia-Romagna Region, Legacoop, Confcooperative, AGCI, Forum del Terzo Settore, Aster, ANCI). These contributed to identifying the survey sample whilest AICCON (Italian Association for the Promotion of the Culture of Cooperation and Non Profit) supported the work from the scientific point of view. Chapter 1 of the research report outlines the framework for social enterprises starting from the definition given by the European Commission and describes the social economy context in Emilia-Romagna.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Orkney Island Cheddar' As a Protected Geographical Indication
    Application to Register the name ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the EU Protected Food Name Scheme A Consultation Paper Rural and Environment Directorate Food and Drink Industry Division T: 0300-244 9148 F: 0131-244 9990 E: [email protected] ___ March 2011 Dear Consultee APPLICATION TO REGISTER THE NAME ‘ORKNEY ISLAND CHEDDAR’ AS A PROTECTED GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION (PGI) UNDER THE EU PROTECTED FOOD NAME SCHEME I am writing to you concerning an application the Scottish Government has received to register ‘Orkney Island Cheddar’ as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) under the above scheme. You or your members may have an interest, or have previously declared an interest, in this application. Details of the scheme can be found at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Business-Industry/Food-Industry/national- strategy/rep/PFNs If the application is successful and the name is protected then only Orkney Island Cheddar conforming to the registered specification would be permitted to use the name. However, before a decision on whether to forward the application to the European Commission for the next stage of the process can be made, in compliance with Article 5.5 of Council Regulation (EC) 510/2006, we are required to consult interested parties within the UK to give them an opportunity to comment or object to the application. I am therefore attaching the specifications which set out the conditions which would need to be met should the application be approved. If you wish to comment or object to the application please let me have your response by 5pm on 28 June 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars
    Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR) October 2015 Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars Charles S. Mayer Reza M. Bakhshandeh Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Key Words MNE’s, SME’s, Hungary, FMCG Retailing, Cooperatives, Rivalry Abstract In this paper we explore the impact of the ivasion of large global retailers into the Hungarian FMCG space. As well as giving the historical evolution of the market, we also show a recipe on how the local SME’s can cope with the foreign competition. “If you can’t beat them, at least emulate them well.” 1. Introduction Our research started with a casual observation. There seemed to be too many FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) stores in Hungary, compared to the population size, and the purchasing power. What was the reason for this proliferation, and what outcomes could be expected from it? Would the winners necessarily be the MNE’s, and the losers the local SME’S? These were the questions that focused our research for this paper. With the opening of the CEE to the West, large multinational retailers moved quickly into the region. This was particularly true for the extended food retailing sector (FMCG’s). Hungary, being very central, and having had good economic relations with the West in the past, was one of the more attractive markets to enter. We will follow the entry of one such multinational, Delhaize (Match), in detail. At the same time, we will note how two independent local chains, CBA and COOP were able to respond to the threat of the invasion of the multinationals.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Real Estate Report Switzerland 2020 Logisticslogistics Real Real Estate Estate Report Report Switzerlandswitzerland 2020
    High investment interest in a dynamic but less liquid market environment LOGISTICS LOGISTICS REAL ESTATE REPORT SWITZERLAND 2020 LOGISTICSLOGISTICS REAL REAL ESTATE ESTATE REPORT REPORT SWITZERLANDSWITZERLAND 2020 OFFER ASKING HIGHLIGHTS SIZES RENTS 3,000 sq m CHF 160 / sq m p.a. 2020 90% QUANTILE 90% QUANTILE 1,350 sq m CHF 125 / sq m p.a. 70% QUANTILE 70% QUANTILE STOCK (GLA*) 25 M sq m 800 sq m CHF 100 / sq m p.a. MEDIAN MEDIAN 500 sq m CHF 85 / sq m p.a. 30% QUANTILE 30% QUANTILE 350 sq m CHF 60 / sq m p.a. 10% QUANTILE 10% QUANTILE SUPPLY (GLA*) 465,000 sq m SUPPLY RATE 1.9% PRIME YIELD (NET) 4.1% CONSTRUCTION INVESTMENTS IN YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION WAREHOUSES AND DEPOTS 2017 CHF 801 M OF SUPPLY (MEDIAN) 1993 Source: FPRE, FSO, CBRE, 2019 / 2020 *GLA = Gross leasable area © CBRE Switzerland 2020 1 LOGISTICS REAL ESTATE REPORT SWITZERLAND 2020 High investment interest in a dynamic but less liquid market environment MANAGEMENT High construction investments in French- The Swiss logistics real estate market, which is proving very resilient in the speaking Switzerland (p. 9 - 10) current coronavirus crisis, is characterized The continuing high volume of new by strong fundamentals and increasing construction is evidence of good demand diversification. The results of the present for space of appropriate quality and size. SUMMARY study, which is rounded off with an interview Investments in warehouses and depots have by Alexandre Monney, fund manager at risen over the last decade, particularly in Procimmo, can be summarized as follows: French-speaking Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Mapping of Existing Fuel Producing Industrial Complexes in Europe
    Project title: Project no.: 212831 Development of advanced biorefinery Instrument: Coordination and Support Action schemes to be integrated into existing Project start date: 1 June 2008 industrial fuel producing complexes Project end date: 31 May 2010 Project website: www.bioref-integ.eu Deliverable 1total Identification and mapping of existing fuel producing industrial complexes in Europe Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: ECN Due delivery date from Annex I: November 2008 Actual delivery date: January 2009 Version: Final Fons Maes BVBA Dissemination level PU Public X RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1 of 100 Contents List of tables 3 List of figures 4 Summary 7 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Work package 1 9 1.1.1 Task 1: Identification and mapping existing (fuel producing) complexes 9 1.1.2 Task 2: Definition of reference cases 10 1.1.3 The questionnaire 10 1.1.4 The structure of the report 10 2. Results of the sector-specific existing industrial (fuel producing) complexes in partner-related countries 11 2.1 Bioethanol sector 11 2.2 Biodiesel sector 13 2.3 Pulp & paper sector 16 2.4 Conventional oil refinery sector 17 2.5 Power production sector 17 2.5.1 Biomass-based power generation in partner-related countries 19 2.6 Food industry sector 21 2.7 Agrosector 22 3. Selection and definition of reference case industrial (fuel producing) complexes 25 3.1 Bioethanol sector 25
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Ecosystems East Anglia a Landscape Enterprise Networks Opportunity Analysis
    1 Healthy Ecosystems East Anglia A Landscape Enterprise Networks opportunity analysis Making Landscapes work for Business and Society Message LENs: Making landscapes 1 work for business and society This document sets out a new way in which businesses can work together to influence the assets in their local landscape that matter to their bottom line. It’s called the Landscape Enterprise Networks or ‘LENs’ Approach, and has been developed in partnership by BITC, Nestlé and 3Keel. Underpinning the LENs approach is a systematic understanding of businesses’ landscape dependencies. This is based on identifying: LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS ASSETS The outcomes that beneficiaries The features and depend on from the landscape in characteristics LANDSCAPE order to be able to operate their in a landscape that underpin BENEFICIARIES businesses. These are a subset the delivery of those functions. Organisations that are of ecosystem services, in that These are like natural capital, dependent on the they are limited to functions in only no value is assigned to landscape. This is the which beneficiaries have them beyond the price ‘market’. sufficient commercial interest to beneficiaries are willing to pay make financial investments in to secure the landscape order to secure them. functions that the Natural Asset underpins. Funded by: It provides a mechanism It moves on from It pulls together coalitions It provides a mechanism Benefits 1 for businesses to start 2 theoretical natural capital 3 of common interest, 4 for ‘next generation’ intervening to landscape- valuations, to identify pooling resources to share diversification in the rural of LENs derived risk in their real-world value propositions the cost of land management economy - especially ‘backyards’; and transactions; interventions; relevant post-Brexit.
    [Show full text]
  • Led by Organisations Including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, WM Perry
    Abattoir, Red Meat Slaughter And Primary Processing – Led by organisations including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, W M Perry Ltd, C H Rowley Ltd, Peter Coates (Alrewas) Ltd, JA Jewett (Meat) Ltd, BW & JD Glaves & Sons Ltd, Euro Quality Lambs Ltd, A Wright & Son, Fowler Bros Ltd, C Brumpton Ltd Accountancy – Led by organisations including Baker Tilly, BDO, Costain, Dains, Deloitte, Government Finance Profession , Ernst & Young, Flemmings, Grant Thornton, Hall and Woodhouse, Harvey & Son, Hazlewoods LLP, Health Education East of England, Kingston Smith, KPMG, Lentells Chartered Accountants, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, NHS Employers, PwC, Solid State Solutions and Warrington and Halton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust with the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT), Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). Accountancy (Phase 4) – Led by organisations including Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Selby Jones Ltd, Shapcotts, Skills for Health Academy (North West), Bibby Ship Management, Jackson Stephen LLP, HFMA, Civil Service, Spofforths LLP, Norse Commercial Services Ltd, Norbert Dentressangle, Charles Wells Limited, TaxAssist Accountants, Mazars, Armstrong Watson, MHA Bloomer Heaven. Actuarial – Led by organisations including Aon Hewitt, Barnett Waddingham, Grant Thornton, KPMG, Mercer, Munich Re, PwC and RSA with the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Adult Care – Led by organisations including Barchester Healthcare, Caretech Community Services, Creative Support, Hand in Hands, Hendra Health Care (Ludlow), Hertfordshire County Council, Housing and Care 21, Oxfordshire County Council, Progressive Care, Surrey County Council, West England Centre for Inclusive Living, Woodford Homecare.
    [Show full text]