DOCSLIB.ORG

The Solun Assassins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Solun Assassins The Solun Assassins By Krste Bitoski (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) The Solun Assassins Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2017 by Krste Bitoski & Risto Stefov e-book edition ************ August 18, 2017 -- In honour of Macedonian Army Day -- I would like to dedicate the translated version of this book to my friends in the Macedonian military and to all Macedonian officers and soldiers who fought and are fighting to protect Macedonia and the Macedonian people. Risto 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ..........................................................................................5 PART ONE ..............................................................................10 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE APPEARANCE OF THE GEMIDZHII CIRCLE .......................10 EUROPEAN CAPITAL INVESTED IN MACEDONIA ...............10 ECONOMIC REVIEW OF VELES ................................................17 FORMING AND SHAPING THE GEMIDZHII CIRCLE .............20 IMAGES OF THE REVOLUTIONARIES .....................................31 Iordan Popiordanov-Ortse (1881-1903)...........................................31 Kosta Ivanov Kirkov (1882-1903)...................................................33 Dimitar Mechev (1870-1903) ..........................................................34 Ilia Trchkov (1884-1903).................................................................36 Vladimir Pingov (1883-1903)..........................................................36 Georgi Bogdanov (1879-1939) ........................................................37 Milan Arsov (1886-1908) ................................................................37 Pavel Potsev Shatev, (1882-1951) ...................................................38 Marko Boshnakov (1874-1903) .......................................................39 Tsvetko Traikov (around 1860-1903) ..............................................39 PART TWO .............................................................................44 THE GEMIDZHII AT WORK ....................................................44 GEMIDZHII - THE REVOLUTIONARY ORGANIZATION -.....44 SUPREME MACEDONIAN COMMITTEE ..................................44 UNSUCCESSFUL MISSION IN TSARI GRAD - DIGGING A TUNNEL IN SOLUN ......................................................................55 IN SEARCH OF MONEY AND DYNAMITE – DIGGING A NEW TUNNEL..........................................................................................64 COLLISION WITH THE MRO CENTRAL COMMITTEE ..........73 SOLUN RESOLUTION FOR UPRISING - RELATIONS WITH DELCHEV .......................................................................................81 FINAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE SOLUN ATTACKS – ATTEMPTS TO DELAY ................................................................91 THE SOLUN ASSASSINS ...........................................................102 IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCES OF THE GEMIDZII ACTIONS ........................................................................................................123 PART THREE........................................................................134 AFTER THE ATTACKS...........................................................134 MASSACRES................................................................................134 3 EVENTS IN BITOLA AND OTHER PARTS OF MACEDONIA ........................................................................................................145 ECHOES OF THE ASSASSINATIONS ABROAD.....................164 PROSECUTION AND IMPRISONMENT OF THE GEMIDZHII ........................................................................................................175 IORDAN POPIORDANOV’S TWO LETTERS...........................206 FATE OF THE GEMIDZHII SENTENCED TO DEATH ...........213 CONCLUSION..............................................................................219 4 PREFACE A number of events during the pre-Ilinden period, more or less, revealed to Europe and to the world that a revolutionary movement was brewing in Macedonia and foretold of the storm that was about to explode in this backward, politically disadvantaged and exploited Ottoman province. The Vinitsa and a number of other failures, the conflicts between the Macedonian armed bands and the Ottoman army, the terror perpetrated by the Ottoman authorities against the Macedonian population, all appeared as normal occurrences of a deep revolutionary situation causing many problems inside and outside of Macedonia. The Solun assassinations, carried out several months before the Ilinden Uprising, were very bloody and serious enough to get the attention of the European public and the diplomatic circles in Europe. The bombings were the work of the Gemidzhii (boatmen, sailors), a small group of people composed mainly of young men, hoping that, through a great struggle against the European establishment in Macedonia, they would force the European Great Powers to ensure Macedonia would be awarded its autonomy, which was promised to them under the 1878 Berlin agreement, and for which the Great Powers were morally responsible. The entire Macedonian population in almost all of Macedonia had accepted the idea of Macedonia being liberated by revolutionary means. At the head of the revolutionary movement stood the Macedonian intelligentsia which believed that Macedonia’s liberation could be achieved through long-term political and material preparations, i.e. through the conscious revolutionary action of the most disadvantaged and exploited people. However, there were some young people who were impatient and felt that individual revolutionary actions and self-sacrifice could replace the collective effort of the many people and thus save them from the consequences of a general and bloody uprising. The Gemidzhii circle in Solun was a child of the times when the Macedonian people were organizing a mass struggle against their centuries-old oppressor… at the time when they were fighting to attain their national and social freedom. Beyond that, the Gemidzhii 5 circle was also a product of a time when anarchism in Europe was “fashionable”, a way of asserting rights and correcting wrongs. Even though the Gemidzhii were influenced by European anarchist and nihilistic ideas, their attitudes and their revolutionary actions were different from those of the European anarchists. The Gemidzhii were extremely compassionate towards the innocent and subjugated population and always took care to minimize suffering caused by their actions. Their attacks were different, especially in their preparation. They never put their own lives ahead of others. They were never careless. They put a lot of effort into their preparations, lasting months and sometimes even years. More importantly they never hesitated to give up their own lives, after their work was done, to prove that they were not common terrorists but fighters fighting for the freedom of their homeland Macedonia. The Gemidzhii neither could nor wanted to penetrate the essence of anarchist ideology. They were not interested in it. They were preoccupied with the question of how to do the job “easier” and “faster” and how to minimize casualties in the liberation of Macedonia. This is why they took the road that they did and the means they applied, which, according to them, would have given them the desired results. The Gemidzhii were a small group of individuals consisting mostly of intellectuals supporting one another in their own little circle. They did not belong to any international organization, party or any part of the Macedonian Revolutionary Organization. Everything they did was voluntary and was done under the disciplinary norms they themselves had created. Iordan Popiordanov-Ortse was recognized as the leader of the Gemidzhii circle, thanks to his character and traits. The main cohesive force that firmly connected the Gemidzhii was their fanatical devotion to their work. They felt responsible for one another and together were responsible for Macedonia’s liberation. The Gemidzhii were a modest bunch, withdrawn, full of love for their people and full of hatred for the enemy. They were young with boundless courage. They did not think of life without freedom, they preferred death over slavery. Their sacrifices were made to convince 6 the people of Europe that a society able to give birth to such heroes was worthy of living a life of freedom. They were preparing for one terrible thing; something that would upset and disturb Europe. They were preparing for a terrible act; to end life. The Gemidzhii worked like shadows always seeking to be anonymous. No one outside of the ten of them knew exactly what they were preparing for and who was going to do what. Very little was known about their ideals, determination and attitude to life and freedom. They were prepared to sacrifice themselves for Macedonia and, except for their work, did not want to leave any trace of themselves in history. The Macedonian armed revolutionary bands, for example, always wanted to be photographed. They wanted to be seen in well- dressed revolutionary gear, well-armed, with big beards. They wanted to look “fearless”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yugoslav Macedonia
    Anticommunist, but Macedonian: Politics of Memory in Post-Yugoslav Macedonia (5,579 words) “The dead heroes of Macedonia, albeit as ghosts, will rise against all of you who will decide to give your support to this harmful plan. Through the destruction of the monuments of the antifascist war, you destroy the present and the future of our country .” 1 In the famous Lieux de mémoire , the French historian Pierre Nora outlines the main forms of a worldwide process identified by him as a ‘global upsurge of memory.’ These involve the critique of the official versions of history and the return to what was hidden away; the search for an obfuscated or ‘confiscated’ past; the cult of ‘roots’ and the development of genealogical investigations; the boom in fervent celebrations and commemorations; legal settlement of past ‘scores’ between different social groups; the growing number of all kinds of museums; the rising need for conservation of archives but also for their opening to the public; and the new attachment to ‘heritage’ ( patrimoine in French).2 It is easy to find many similar symptoms in the contemporary public space of the Republic of Macedonia. Since its independence in 1991, political and academic entrepreneurs have promoted, sometimes with opposite goals, new versions of national history. The cult of millenary roots and the genealogical and ‘ethnogenetical’ (para-)historiographic genres are becoming ever more popular and in some circles at least, the heritage of ancient Macedonia and its famous rulers – Philip and Alexander – is embraced as a token of national pride. 3 In 2003, an impressively long list of commemorations marked the centennial of the anti-Ottoman St.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Historical Events in Greek Occupied Macedonia Part 3
    Analysis of historical events in Greek occupied Macedonia Part 3 An interview with Risto Stefov Analysis of historical events in Greek occupied Macedonia An interview with Risto Stefov Part 3 Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2018 by Risto Stefov e-book edition *** April 12, 2018 *** 2 INTERVIEWER – In this interview I would like to ask you some questions about your family and verify some of the things your dad and uncle had said to me in their interviews. Was your grandfather Risto involved in the Illinden Uprising? I remember seeing a photo on someone’s wall. What can you tell me about his life in the village? RISTO – My grandfather Risto was not involved in the Ilinden Uprising because, from what my father had told me, he was not in Macedonia. He was on pechalba (migrant work) but I don’t know where and for how long. He purchased a rifle and wanted to return but the borders were shut and he could not come back in time. He did come back later and brought the rifle with him and gave it to his oldest son Lazo who then used it during the German-Italian- Bulgarian occupation when he was a partisan for a brief period of time before he died in 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Party System and European Integration Process
    Mladen Karadzoski* Macedonian Party System and European Integration Process Introduction Macedonia gained its independence in 1991, after the dissolution of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which part was from 1945. Since 1991 Macedonia started to establish and develop its political system, which immanent segment are also the political parties. Although widespread on 25 715 km2 with about 2 million inhabitants, the Republic of Macedonia is characterized by a great number of political parties. According to the Court of First Instance Skopje, where the register of political parties is held, in 2009 there were 99 registered political parties,1 which means that the political space in the country is overfl owing. This leads to the conclusion that the party system in the country is atomized. The purpose of this paper is to determine the level of support for the process of accession of the Republic of Macedonia in the European Union by political parties, but also to determine whether that support is only nominal, i.e. declarative, or is it realistic, concrete and active support real- ized through instruments and mechanisms available to the political par- ties in the country. Also, in this paper will be analyzed the attitudes of political parties in Macedonia, referring to the name dispute with Greece, fostering good neighborly relations with Bulgaria, Serbia and Albania, but also in respect of certain internal political issues. Macedonian Party System The transition from one party in a pluralistic party system meant greater opportunity for political organization and association of citizens * Mladen Karadzoski – Ph.D., Faculty of Law University St.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges to Democratic Representation in the Public Space of Societies in Transition: Case Study of the City of Skopje
    The struggle to belong Dealing with diversity in 21st century urban setting. Amsterdam, 7-9 July 2011 Challenges to Democratic Representation in the Public Space of Societies in Transition: case study of the city of Skopje Katerina Mojanchevska Programme Coordinator at Performing Arts Center Multimedia, DTC Mavrovka, Lamela C 1/1, Skopje, Macedonia, e-mail: [email protected] Paper presented at the International RC21 Conference 2011 Session: 5.2 PUBLIC SPACE: GOVERNING DIVERSITY. Abstract Today the reality in most European cities is that they have grown to become places where diverse realities mix, social interaction happen and cultural expressions materialize, generating conflicts related to multiculturalism. Management of cultural diversity at city level positions two dilemmas. The first related to the tension among the cultural expression of the state culture and the recognition of groups with political demands and cultural expression different from those of the majority and the second, the subversion of the equality principle when rights based on group identities are claimed (Tatjer, 2004: 248). How can the cities accommodate cultural difference? What kind of practices of the public domain and shared public space should be developed so that the participation and representation of different ethno-cultural groups and their cultural right are taking part in defining and redefining city`s boundaries, use and management? The paper looks at these questions from the point of view of the city of Skopje, the capital of Macedonia and its urban practices which profoundly cut and pasted fragments of its history, image and identity. 1 Introduction Access to publicly shared space and achievement of cultural diversity in shared public spaces pose a great challenge for multicultural post-socialist societies with experience of violent inter- ethnic conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhabited Places in Aegean Macedonia
    Inhabited Places in Aegean Macedonia By Todor Hristov Simovski (Edited by Risto Stefov) Inhabited Places in Aegean Macedonia Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2019 by Todor Hristov Simovski e-book edition ************** January 20, 2019 ************** 2 Contents PREFACE ......................................................................................4 IN PLACE OF AN INTRODUCTION..........................................5 I - REPERCUSSIONS DURING THE BALKAN WARS (1912- 1913) ..............................................................................................7 II - MIGRATORY MOVEMENTS IN AEGEAN (GREEK OCCUPIED) MACEDONIA DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR ............................................................................................10 III - MIGRATORY MOVEMENTS IN AEGEAN (GREEK OCCUPIED) MACEDONIA (1919-1940)..................................12 1. Migration of Macedonians to Bulgaria and the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes ..............................................................12 2. Resettlement of Macedonian Emigrants in Bulgaria ...................15 3. Emigration of Macedonians to Overseas Countries.....................18
    [Show full text]
  • "Shoot the Teacher!": Education and the Roots of the Macedonian Struggle
    "SHOOT THE TEACHER!" EDUCATION AND THE ROOTS OF THE MACEDONIAN STRUGGLE Julian Allan Brooks Bachelor of Arts, University of Victoria, 1992 Bachelor of Education, University of British Columbia, 200 1 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of History O Julian Allan Brooks 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Julian Allan Brooks Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: "Shoot the Teacher!" Education and the Roots of the Macedonian Struggle Examining Committee: Chair: Professor Mark Leier Professor of History Professor AndrC Gerolymatos Senior Supervisor Professor of History Professor Nadine Roth Supervisor Assistant Professor of History Professor John Iatrides External Examiner Professor of International Relations Southern Connecticut State University Date Approved: DECLARATION OF PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection, and, without changing the content, to translate the thesislproject or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Меѓународен Годишник International Yearbook
    МЕЃУНАРОДЕН INTERNATIONAL ГОДИШНИК YEARBOOK НА ФАКУЛТЕТОТ ЗА БЕЗБЕДНОСТ FACULTY OF SECURITY 2020/1 2020/1 Publisher: Faculty of security – Skopje D-r Sc. Andrej Sotlar, Dean of the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, For the Publisher: University of Maribor, Slovenia; D-r Sc. Nikola Dujovski, Dean D-r Sc. Vladimir Cvetkovic, Dean of the Faculty of Security, Beograd, Serbia; International editorial board: D-r Sc. Dane Subosic, University of D-r Sc. Nikola Dujovski, Dean of the Criminal Investigation and Police studies, Faculty of Security - Skopje, UKLO, Beograd, Serbia; North Macedonia; D-r Sc. Krunoslav Borovec, Dean of the D-r Sc. Vesna Stefanovska, Faculty of Higher Police School, Croatia; Security - Skopje, UKLO, North D-r Sc. Irma Deljkic, Faculty of Macedonia; Criminalistics, Criminology and Security D-r Sc. Natasha Peovska, Faculty of Studies, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia Security - Skopje, UKLO, North and Herzegovina Macedonia; D-r Sc. Vesna Nikolic Ristanovic, D-r Sc. Cvetko Andreevski, Dean of Faculty of Special Education and Faculty of tourism and hospitality, Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, UKLO, North Macedonia; Serbia D-r Sc. Aleksandra Gruevska- D-r Sc. Branislav Simonović, Faculty of Drakulevski, Law Faculty Iustinianus Law, University of Kragujevac, Serbia; Primus, UKIM, North Macedonia; D-r Sc. Darko Maver, Faculty of D-r Sc. Strashko Stojanovski, Law Criminal Justice and Security, University Faculty, Goce Delchev University, North of Maribor, Slovenia; Macedonia; D-r Sc. Gorazd Meško, Faculty of D-r Sc. Svetlana Veljanoska, Law Criminal Justice and Security, University Faculty, UKLO, North Macedonia; of Maribor, Slovenia; D-r Sc. Vesna Trajanovska, International Balkan University, North Macedonia; Editorial Board: D-r Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Greek Occupied Macedonia
    TheTruth about Greek Occupied Macedonia By Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) The Truth about Greek Occupied Macedonia Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2017 by Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov e-book edition January 7, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................6 CHAPTER ONE – Struggle for our own School and Church .......8 1. Macedonian texts written with Greek letters .................................9 2. Educators and renaissance men from Southern Macedonia.........15 3. Kukush – Flag bearer of the educational struggle........................21 4. The movement in Meglen Region................................................33 5. Cultural enlightenment movement in Western Macedonia..........38 6. Macedonian and Bulgarian interests collide ................................41 CHAPTER TWO - Armed National Resistance ..........................47 1. The Negush Uprising ...................................................................47 2. Temporary Macedonian government ...........................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Historiography in the Republic of Macedonia After
    ULF/161-182elis 23-11-04 16:12 ™ÂÏ›‰·161 VOLUME 4 (2003-4) HISTOREIN In 2001, when the Albanian extremist National Liberation Army (UCˇK) fought security troops of the Republic of Macedonia, a number of Mace- donian historians offered explanations for the Serving bloodshed. They denounced the claims of the Albanian rebels as well as the Albanian political the Nation: parties by referring to their alleged plans for a Greater Albania, although there is little evidence that this idea was popular among the Albanians Historiography of former Yugoslavia.1 Historians gave inter- views to newspapers and wrote editorials stating in the Republic that Albanian claims for more rights within the state were simply camouflaging their real goal of of Macedonia seceding from Macedonia. They pointed to a presumably long tradition of Albanian national- ism and extremism in the region, expressed, for (FYROM) example, by the annexation of western Macedo- nia by Albania during World War II. They also After Socialism* deplored the demographic Albanization of parts of Macedonia and described it as a deliberate strategy to push out ethnic Macedonians.2 By calling upon certain past events perceived as traumatic and mobilizing deep-rooted stereo- types and prejudices against the country’s largest minority, these historians sought to Ulf Brunnbauer manipulate public opinion and shape political responses to the security crisis. They linked the current security crisis to so-called historical tra- ditions and roots and saw Macedonian national identity jeopardized by Albanian extremists. Events were perceived and explained in such a way that they became part of a mythological narration of victimization.
    [Show full text]