DOCSLIB.ORG

UNFPA Country Programme Evaluation: Georgia Period Covered

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNFPA Country Programme Evaluation: Georgia Period Covered Volume 3 UNFPA Country Programme Evaluation: Georgia Period covered by evaluation: 2016-2018 September 2019 Evaluation Team Ms Nato Alhazishvili Georgia National Evaluation Team Leader and National Expert Gender Equality and Women Empowerment, and Population Dynamics Ms Mzia Tabatadze Georgia National Expert on Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights UNFPA Coutry Programme Evaluation (2016-2018): Georgia Acknowledgments The evaluation team would like to thank UNFPA for the opportunity to undertake the UNFPA 3rd country program evaluation. Our appreciation goes to all the Georgia country office staff for the generosity of their time for the interviews and providing documents for our desk reviews and answering several questions to validate our field findings. We would especially like to thank Ms. Lela Bakradze , Assistant Representative and Natalia Zakareishvili, the National Pgoramme Analyst. We appreciate the logistics support for the field visits provided by the staff. We would like to thank the Evaluation Reference Group for their valuable feedback and inputs to our preliminary findings and recommendations. We would like to thank national stakeholders from government institutions, the Parliament of Georgia, civil society and development partners. Finally, we also appreciate the technical guidance from and quality assurance provided by Alison King, Cluster Evaluation Team Leader, and support provided by Mariam Sikharulidze, Research Assistant, during this evaluation exercise. Evaluation Reference Group Marina Darakhvelidze Head of Heath Care Department, Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories of Georgia, Labour, Health and Social Affairs Ketevan Goginashvili Head of Health Policy Division, Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories of Georgia, Labour, Health and Social Affairs Mariam Jajanidze Adviser at Human Rights Secretariat of Government Administration of Georgia/ Secretariat of the Inter-Agency Commission Shorena Tsiklauri Head of Population Census and Demographic Statistics Department at Geostat Gigi Bregadze Democratic Governance Team Leader at UNDP Lela Sturua Head of the Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology and Health Promotion Department at NCDC&PH Nino Tsereteli Executive Director, NGO Tanadgoma Maia Tsereteli Head of Department, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, STI & TB , NCDC&PH Natalia Zahareishvili Programme Analyst and Evaluation Manager, Georgia Disclaimer: This is a product of the independent evaluation team and the content, analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), its Executive Committee or Member States. 2 UNFPA Coutry Programme Evaluation (2016-2018): Georgia Country Map 3 UNFPA Coutry Programme Evaluation (2016-2018): Georgia Table of contents Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................... 2 Key facts .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.1 Purpose and objectives of the country programme evaluation .................................................... 16 1.2 Scope of the country programme evaluation ............................................................................... 16 1.3 Evaluation methodology.............................................................................................................. 16 1.4 Evaluation process ....................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2: Country context Georgia...................................................................................................... 22 2.1. Development challenges and national strategies ........................................................................ 22 2.2 The role of external assistance .................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 3: UNFPA response Georgia ................................................................................................... 27 3.1. United Nations and UNFPA response ........................................................................................ 27 3.2 UNFPA programme response ..................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 4: Findings .......................................................................................................................... 35 4.1 Relevance .............................................................................................................................. 35 4.1.1. Consistency with priorities put forward in the UNFPA Strategic Plans and the United Nations Partnership for Sustainable Development Georgia .......................................................... 35 4.1.2 Consistency with government priorities and international commitments ............................ 37 4.1.3. Consistency with and responsiveness to the needs of supported institutions and vulnerable population groups .......................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Effectiveness Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights ......................................................... 39 4.2.1. UNFPA contribution to stronger evidence-based policy frameworks for delivering quality integrated SRH services for women and A&Y and with a focus on the SRH rights and needs of vulnerable populations. ................................................................................................................. 40 4.2.2 Delivery of quality integrated SRHR services/information for women and A&Y, with a focus on vulnerable populations, and 4.2.3. uptake of UNFPA-supported SRHR services .......... 43 4.3 Effectiveness Gender ............................................................................................................. 53 4.3.1 UNFPA contribution to stronger evidence-based policies to advance GE and RR, including GBV and harmful practices, and with a particular focus on the rights and needs of A&Y and the most vulnerable and marginalised women. ................................................................................... 54 4.3.2/4.3.3 Provision of quality GBV prevention and response services/information, particularly for A&Y and the most vulnerable and marginalised women, and uptake of UNFPA-supported services by targeted beneficiaries. ................................................................................................. 55 4.3.4. Sensitisation of targeted stakeholders and beneficiaries and prevention of GBSS and early/child marriages ..................................................................................................................... 56 4.3.5. Monitoring of recommendations and obligations on SRH and RR issued by national human rights treaty bodies ........................................................................................................................ 58 4.4 Effectiveness Population Dynamics ...................................................................................... 59 4 UNFPA Coutry Programme Evaluation (2016-2018): Georgia 4.4.1 Awareness and capacities for generating and analysing disaggregated population data, assessing demographic development linkages, and production of surveys and reports ................ 60 4.4.2 Political will and capacities for evidence-based policymaking, and availability and implementation of national policies and programmes that address PD and its interlinkages with SRHR ............................................................................................................................................ 61 4.5 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 62 4.5.1 National ownership and financial viability of UNFPA-supported activities and services ... 62 4.6 Efficiency .................................................................................................................................... 64 4.6.1. Adequate conversion of resources into activities and outputs ............................................. 65 4.6.2 Appropriate combination of tools and approaches for smooth programme delivery ........... 66 4.7 Coordination ................................................................................................................................ 68 4.7.1 Contribution to UNCT coordination mechanisms and joint programmes and initiatives. ... 68 4.8 Added Value ................................................................................................................................ 70 4.8.1 UNFPA added value ............................................................................................................. 70 CHAPTER 5: Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 71 5.1 Strategic level .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Sixty-Third Session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe
    Report of the sixty-third session of the WHO Regional Committee for Europe Çeşme Izmir, Turkey, 16–19 September 2013 Keywords REGIONAL HEALTH PLANNING HEALTH POLICY HEALTH PRIORITIES RESOLUTIONS AND DECISIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION EUROPE EUR/RC63/REC/1 Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Communication for a Culture of Peace in a Post-Conflict Context
    Hanna Sjödin, August, 2020 Participatory communication for a culture of peace in a post- conflict context A study of communication in the aftermath of the Abkhaz- Georgian armed conflict Communication for Development One-year master 15 Credits Spring 2020 Supervisor: Josepha Wessels Degree project, Communication for Development, Hanna Sjödin, August, 2020 Participatory communication for a culture of peace in a post-conflict context Abstract This study aims at researching how a sustainable culture of peace can be built through civic engagement in the Abkhaz-Georgian post conflict context. It does so by learning from locally based NGOs, working for a culture of peace in areas affected by the Abkhaz-Georgian armed conflict which occurred 1993 to 1994. The studied NGOs work for different components within a Culture of Peace such as; women’s rights, peace building, social and economic development, democratic participations and human rights. In order to answer the research question following sub questions are answered: What can we learn from the experiences of the studied organizations’ participatory communication for social change? How has the culture of communication in the Abkhaz-Georgian post conflict context been affecting the participatory communication for social change for the different organizations? The method to collect data to the research has been through a field study in Abkhazia and outside its border on the Georgian side, in the city Zugdidi which is the closest city to the Abkhazian border. Participatory observations and interviews with representatives from the different organizations working for a culture of peace were conducted during two and a half months. The theoretical framework used for the study consists of three theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Georgia in 2019
    Assessment of the Performance of the Parliament of Georgia in 2019 TBILISI, 2020 Head of Research: Lika Sajaia Lead researcher: Tamar Tatanashvili Researcher: Gigi Chikhladze George Topouria We would like to thank the interns of Transparency International of Georgia for participating in the research: Marita Gorgoladze, Guri Baliashvili, Giorgi Shukvani, Mariam Modebadze. The report was prepared with the financial assistance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Norway Contents Research Methodology __________________________________________________ 8 Chapter 1. Main Findings _________________________________________________ 9 Chapter 2. General Information about the Parliament ____________________ 12 Chapter 3. General Statistics ____________________________________________ 14 Chapter 4. Important events ______________________________________________ 16 4.1 Interparliamentary Assembly on Orthodoxy (chaired by Russian Duma Deputy Gavrilov) and a wave of protests _________________________________ 16 4.2 Failure of the proportional election system __________________________ 17 4.3 Election of Supreme Court judges ____________________________________ 19 4.4 Abolishing Nikanor Melia’s immunity and terminating his parliamentary mandate ________________________________________________________________ 20 4.5 Changes in the Composition of Parliamentary Subjects _______________ 20 4.6 Vote of Confidence in the Government _____________________________ 21 4.7 Report of the President ______________________________________________ 21 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Young Women¸S Voices About War, Peace and Power
    9a_LUOS `LQ XUNU`R G=C<5E=;3<¸AD=713A/0=CBE/@>3/13/<2>=E3@ Pushing the limits Young women’s voices about war, peace and power © pushing the limits – Young women’s voices about war, peace and power ReseaRch and inteRviews: KaRin tidestRöm editoRs: anna LithandeR and agneta södeRbeRg Jacobson RefeRence gRoup: chRistine bendeR, Åsa carlman, Liv ­FellandeR and eva Zillén design: Louise Bååth photogRaphy: maRia stéen [ M ] MOMENT the Kvinna till Kvinna foundation SlaKthuspLan 3 s- 121 62 Johanneshov sweden teLephone: +46-8-588 89 100 fax: +46-8-588 891 01 e-maiL: [email protected] www.iKtK.se ISBN 91- 974999 – 8 – 6 Printed by: swepogRafisKa Contents preface 8 madlena Kvaratskhelia 10 1. introduction 14 the right to one’s self 15 backlash and new opportunities 15 young women’s voices 15 najyeh hamad el-naim 1 2. Young women’s right to their bodies 20 self esteem 21 the denied right to sexuality 21 the institution of virginity 24 early marriages and young mothers 2 Fidaa adel Jabari 28 gender based violence 31 domestic violence after conflict 33 girls in the armed forces 34 abuse by the international community 35 laila Karoufeh 38 3. the right to freedom of movement 42 gender stereotypes control young women 44 Lack of communication 45 nana gelashvili 48 4. the right to meet and organise 52 the importance of meeting places 53 young women, democracy and peace 5 exchange promotes peace 58 whose knowledge counts? 58 nadja duhacek 0 conclusions 4 bibliography 66 notes 8 Preface Young women are at risk even during times of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality in Georgia: Barriers and Recommendations
    PARLIAMENT Promoting Rule of Law OF GEORGIA In Georgia (PROLoG) GENDER EQUALITY IN GEORGIA: BARRIERS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Volume 1 January 2018 This study is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under the USAID-funded initiative Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia (PROLoG) implemented by the East-West Management Institute, Inc. (EWMI), and by the assistance from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Government of Sweden, under the UN Joint Programme for Gender Equality. It was developed by PROLoG/UNDP international expert, Lori Mann, with the invaluable contributions and assistance of Tamar Tomashvili, PROLoG local expert and Nino Janashia, United Nations Development Programme local expert. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of its authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID, the United States Government, EWMI, UNDP, Government of Sweden or Parliament of Georgia. Contents Preface 5 Acknowledgments 6 I. Executive summary 7 II. List of recommendations 11 III. Introduction 21 IV. Glossary 23 V. Gender Equality Law 24 A. Enforcement mechanisms 25 B. Definitions 25 C. Discrimination 27 D. Positive action 28 E. Gender-disaggregated statistics 28 F. Gender equality in labour relations 29 G. Local self-government bodies 33 H. Gender impact assessment reports 34 I. Gender equality in education 35 J. Gender equality in artistic and intellectual creation and production 36 K. Gender equality in information resources and technology 36 L. Gender Equality and Healthcare 37 M. Gender equality in sport 38 N. Gender equality in actuarial factors 38 O.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Women in Georgia
    Violence against Women in Georgia Report submitted on the occasion of the 36th session of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women New York, August 2006 Research and drafting: GYLA Sophio Japaridze, [email protected] Khatuna Chitanava, [email protected] Irma Aladashvili, [email protected] OMCT Mariana Duarte, [email protected] 1 2 Foreword The submission of alternative reports is one of the main activities of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association (GYLA). The collaboration between both organisations in the preparation of this report is a combination of OMCT’s Violence against Women programme’s experience in submitting alternative information to the CEDAW and GYLA’s access to first-hand information on the situation of victims, also through its work with authorities and relevant institutions in Georgia. In particular, GYLA has been very active in putting forward legislative and protective measures aiming at improving the situation of victims of domestic violence and trafficking. Hence the information you will find in this report is very precise in that respect. This report aims to provide useful information to CEDAW experts relating to the List of issues and questions with regard to the consideration of the periodic report of Georgia (CEDAW/C/GEO/Q/3). The relevant items of the List of issues are referred to accordingly in each part of the report. Although the promises made by the Georgian Republic in the aftermath of the Beijing conference are now starting to be fulfilled at a fast pace, after many years of inaction, much still remains to be done in order to advance women’s rights and ensure gender equality in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • (GIN) Global Immunization News
    Global Immunization News (GIN) April 2014 In this issue News NEW! You can now click on the article you are interested in and World Immunization Week 2014: Know, check, protect access it directly! Hayatee Hasan, WHO HQ News World Immunization Week, which Vaccination Week in the Americas 2 takes place in the last week of April 2014 every year, is an opportunity to re- Western Pacific Region Celebrates 2 mind families and communities how Regional Immunization Week 2014 effective vaccines can be, and to en- Measles and Rubella Preparedness for 3 courage people to take action to en- the World Cup Georgia achieves first-year target of 3 sure that more children, and increas- rotavirus vaccination ingly people in other age groups, are immunized against deadly and debilitating diseases. Paraguay and the Americas against 4 Measles and Rubella The World Immunization Week campaign website in the six official languages is now live. Oral Cholera Vaccine stockpile cam- 5 An online, multilingual toolbox which allows campaign supporters to build their own post- paign amongst Internally Displaced ers, choosing from different visuals is also available. Help us spread the word by choosing People (IDPs) in South Sudan 5 What works? What drives routine a poster from our online, multilingual toolbox. Print, post in your office, school, or health- immunization performance in Africa? care centre, and share on social media to make this year’s campaign truly global. Summary of the WHO Strategic Group 6 of Experts (SAGE) April 2014 meeting A 30-second public service announcement (PSA) is now online and we encourage cam- 6 WHO Strategic Advisory Group of paign supporters to share it on social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 9 May 2018
    United Nations E/FFDF/2018/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 9 May 2018 Original: English Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up 23–26 April 2018 Report of the Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up I. Matter calling for action by the Economic and Social Council or brought to its attention 1. The Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up recommends that the Economic and Social Council transmit to the high- level political forum on sustainable development, convened under the auspices of the Council, the following intergovernmentally agreed conclusions and recommendations: Follow-up and review of the financing for development outcomes and the means of implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 1. We, ministers and high-level representatives, having met in New York at United Nations Headquarters from 23 to 26 April 2018 at the third Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up, express our resolve to continue to work towards the full and timely implementation of the Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, which builds on the 2002 Monterrey Consensus and the 2008 Doha Declaration on Financing for Development. We reiterate our goal to end poverty and hunger, and to achieve sustainable development in its three dimensions through promoting inclusive economic growth, protecting the environment and fostering social inclusion. We recall that the Addis Ababa Action Agenda provides a global framework for financing sustainable development and is an integral part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, contextualizing its means of implementation targets with concrete policies and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Ethnicity and the Nation-State: Anatolia and Its Neighboring Regions
    GENDER, ETHNICITY AND THE NATION-STATE: ANATOLIA AND ITS NEIGHBORING REGIONS Hrant Dink Memorial Workshop 2009 Proceedings Edited by Leyla Keough SABANCI UNIVERSITY, İSTANBUL 2011 GENDER, ETHNICITY AND THE NATION-STATE: ANATOLIA AND ITS NEIGHBORING REGIONS Hrant Dink Memorial Workshop 2009 Proceedings Edited by Leyla Keough SABANCI UNIVERSITY, İSTANBUL 2011 Hrant Dink Memorial Workshop 2009 Proceedings Hrant Dink Memorial Workshop 2009 Proceedings Contents Published in 2011 by Sabancı University © 2011 SabancıUniversity All rights reserved. The pdf version of these proceedings can be reproduced, shared, and printed online without permission as long as no changes are made to the original document and due credit is given. ISBN: 978-605-4348-17-6 Cover and page design by GrafikaSU, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The Hrant Dink Memorial Workshops were initiated in 2008 by a group of academics at Sabancı University. Focusing on a different theme each year, the Workshop Series in memory of Hrant Dink seek to encourage interdisciplinary academic dialogue across borders. For more information: Dedicated to Dicle Koğacıoğlu (1972-2009) http://myweb.sabanciuniv.edu/hrantdink-workshop/ who made significant contributions to the workshop email: [email protected] as well as to the lives of many participants Hrant Dink Memorial Workshop 2009 “Gender, Ethnicity, and the Nation-State: Anatolia and Its Neighboring Regions in the Twentieth Century,” which took place at Tütün Deposu (Tobacco Warehouse) in Tophane, Istanbul between May 21 and We miss her... 24, 2009, was organized by Sabancı University in collaboration with the International Hrant Dink Foundation and Anadolu Kültür, with the generous support of the Chrest Foundation, the Open Society Institute, Sabancı University, and Anadolu Kültür.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Threat Framing and Mobilization in Civil War
    This is a repository copy of Collective threat framing and mobilization in civil war. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/110137/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Shesterinina, A. (2016) Collective threat framing and mobilization in civil war. American Political Science Review, 110 (3). pp. 411-427. ISSN 0003-0554 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000277 This article has been published in a revised form in American Political Science Review [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000277]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © American Political Science Association 2016. Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Collective Threat Framing and Mobilization in Civil War* Anastasia Shesterinina† _________________________ Paper accepted for publication in the American Political Science Review Subsequent version published online 24 October 2016, in print Vol. 110, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of 30+ Years of Working with Conflict in the Georgian- Abkhaz-South Ossetian Contexts
    Analysis of 30+ years of working with conflict in the Georgian- Abkhaz-South Ossetian contexts Larissa Sotieva and Juliet Schofield February Independent Peace Associates 2021 Analysis of 30+ years of working with conflict in the Georgian-Abkhaz-South Ossetian contexts Authors Larissa Sotieva and Juliet Schofield Independent Peace Associates (Indie Peace) Published by Independent Peace Associates © Independent Peace Associates, 2021, all rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Independent Peace Associates Ltd is a company limited by guarantee, no. 12182214. Registered office 34b York Way, London N1 9AB, United Kingdom. This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union under the European Union Responsive Resource Fund implemented by the United Nations Development Programme. Its contents are the sole responsibility of Independent Peace Associates and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union nor the United Nations Development Programme. Contents Contents About Independent Peace Associates 5 About the authors 6 Introduction 7 Background and purpose 8 Methodology 8 Limitations and reflexivity 10 Conceptual framework for conflict transformation 12 The emergence of peacebuilding: motivations and early initiatives 15 Impact and results of peacebuilding and conflict transformation 23 Immediate, accumulated and delayed impacts 24 Personal and individual level transformation 26 Relational level transformation 28 Political and societal level 29 1. The influence of civil society
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Violations in Georgia Alternative Report to The
    HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN GEORGIA ALTERNATIVE REPORT TO THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE 90th session INITIALLY SUBMITTED TO THE UN COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE AT TIS 36th SESSION – MAY 2006 Public Health and Medicine Development Fund of Human Rights Georgia Information and Documentation Center Researched and written by : Nino Gvedashvili and Ucha Nanuashvili (HRIDC) Ana Dolidze and Sophie Japaridze (GYLA) Lia Saralidze, Ketevan Margalitadze and Mariam Maskhulia (PHMDF) Mariana Duarte, Cécile Trochu and Patrick Mutzenberg (OMCT) OMCT wish to thank Vanessa Kerampran, Victoria Lee and Vénus Maroun for their assistance in the research and edition of the report. Geneva – Tbilisi, 24th April 2006 1 Foreword: Writing alternative reports is one of the primary activities of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and a vital source of information for the United Nations Treaty Bodies including the Committee Against Torture (CAT). This activity is complementary to providing direct assistance to victims. These alternative reports are a valuable source for Independent Experts who analyse the implementation of the United Nations Human Rights Instruments. With these reports, it is possible to see the situation as objectively as possible and to take a critical look at government action to eradicate torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Under the aegis of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation, OMCT’s “State Compliance” Programme together with the “Rights of the Child” and “Violence against Women” Programmes present this report on human rights violations in Georgia at the occasion of the 36th session of the Committee Against Torture to be held in Geneva from 1st May to 19th May 2006 during which the third periodic Georgian Report will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]