DOCSLIB.ORG

High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH MONDAY, THE 28 JULY,2014 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 47 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 48 TO 50 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 51 TO 66 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 67 TO 90 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 28.07.2014 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 28.07.2014 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. CHAT.A.REF 4/2014 COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF RAKESH AGARWAL CM APPL. 11648/2014 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA Vs. SHRI TARUN GOYAL AND ANR 2. CHAT.A.REF 5/2014 COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF RAKESH AGGARWAL CM APPL. 11649/2014 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA Vs. S C BANSAL AND ANR AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 3. LPA 545/2012 SYNDICATE BANK SUDEER,ARVIND SHARMA REVIEW PET. 483/2013 Vs. NIDHI BUILDERS INDIA PVT CM APPL. 15186/2013 LTD AND ORS (Disposed-off Case) 4. LPA 64/2014 AWADESH KUMAR PRAJAPATI BHUPESH NARULA,ADITYA MADAN Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 5. LPA 137/2014 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF BALBIR SINGH CM APPL. 2544/2014 INDIA Vs. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD 6. LPA 253/2014 ROSHAN LAL MITHILESH KR SINGH,TARUN CM APPL. 5186/2014 Vs. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND VERMA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD 7. W.P.(C) 2220/2012 CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST PRASHANHT BHUSHAN,OM LITIGATION THROUGH ITS PARKASH,NEERAJ CHAUDHARI,PK GENERAL SECRETARY SHARMA,RV SINHA Vs. UOI AND ORS 8. W.P.(C) 4414/2012 NITU AND ORS LIYI MARLI NOSHI,FERIDA Vs. THE GOVT. OF SATARWALA,SUMEET PUSHKARNA NATIONALCATIPAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS 9. W.P.(C) 3667/2013 TAMILAND MERCANTILE BANK G. SIVABALAMURUGAN AND ANIS CM APPL. 6879/2013 SHARE HOLDERS WELFARE MOHAMMAD,S.PUSHKARNA ASSOCIATION Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 10. W.P.(C) 7213/2013 EDUCATION PROMOTION SOCIETY S. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,AMITESH CM APPL. 15519/2013 FOR INDIA AND ANR KUMAR,JATAN SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 11. W.P.(C) 3700/2014 TV TODAY NETWORK LIMITED TMT LAW PRACTICE,MANEESHA CM APPL. 7505/2014 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR DHIR,SAKET SINGH 28.07.2014 2 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) FOR DIRECTIONS ________________ 12. W.P.(C) 2415/2013 DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS ROXNA S SWAMY,JAYANT CM APPL. 4574/2013 Vs. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF TRIPATHI CM APPL. 993/2014 INDIA AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING ______________________________________________ 13. LPA 577/2012 DELHI INTEGRATED MULTI-MODAL RAJAT NAVET,PRASHANT BHUSHAN CM APPL. 17697/2012 TRANSIT SYSTEM LTD Vs. RAKESH AGGARWAL 14. LPA 578/2012 DELHI INTEGRATED MULTI-MODAL RAJAT NAVET,KRITI SINGH TRANSIT SYSTEM LTD GAHLOUT Vs. SACHIN SAPRA 28.07.2014 COURT NO.2 (DIVISION BENCH-2) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. W.P.(C) 2528/2013 COMMUNICATION WORLD RUCHIR BHATIA,LATIKA DUTTA Vs. COMMISSIONER, TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR 2. W.P.(C) 3119/2013 COMMUNICATION WORLD RUCHIR BHATIA,SD SALWAN CM APPL. 5916/2013 Vs. COMMISSIONER, TRADE AND TAXES AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 3. W.P.(C) 4307/2012 JAI SINGH AND ANR ARVIND BHATT,MINI PUSHKARNA CM APPL. 8924/2012 Vs. LAND ACQUISITION CM APPL. 11950/2013 COLLECTOR/ ADM AND ORS 4. W.P.(C) 1572/2013 VIJAY GUPTA VINAY VAISH Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-XIII AND ANR 5. W.P.(C) 2243/2013 HERO MOTOCORP LTD AND ANR VINAY VAISH,S SABHARWAL CM APPL. 4271/2013 Vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANR 6. W.P.(C) 6159/2013 BALASUBRAMANIAN RAMACHANDRAN DEEPAK CHOPRA,AMOL SINHA CM APPL. 13549/2013 Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 8 7. W.P.(C) 7948/2013 HCLTECHNOLOGIES LIMITED KAVITA JHA,SANJEEV SABHARWAL CM APPL. 16840/2013 Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. 8. CM APPL. 7227/2014 MARINO CABLES INDIA (PVT) LTD SHREAY KUMAR ATTRI In W.P.(C) 214/2014 Vs. COMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX (Disposed-off Case) 9. W.P.(C) 1062/2014 CEECO TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD JAYA GOEL,AMRIT PAL SINGH CM APPL. 2189/2014 Vs. CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS CM APPL. 2870/2014 DEPARTMENT AND ORS 10. W.P.(C) 2271/2014 BESCO LIMITED (FOUNDRY RANA S. BISWAS CM APPL. 4746/2014 DIVISION) CM APPL. 8020/2014 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 11. W.P.(C) 2278/2014 JINDAL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE SINGH AND ASSO. CM APPL. 4791/2014 LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 28.07.2014 3 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 12. W.P.(C) 2280/2014 AMTEK RAILCAR INDUSTRIES PVT SINGH AND ASSO. CM APPL. 4795/2014 LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 13. W.P.(C) 3162/2014 FINEST PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. AND TARUN GULATI CM APPL. 6608/2014 ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 14. W.P.(C) 3280/2014 M/S OTIK HOTELS AND RESORTS MANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA CM APPL. 6785/2014 PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 15. W.P.(C) 4538/2014 M/S STAX INC. PREM RANJAN KUMAR Vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, 28.07.2014 COURT NO. 3 (DIVISION BENCH – 3) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 1. FAO(OS) 43/2013 MODERN COOPERATIVE GROUP SUNIL DALAL,MOHIT K HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. SHARMA,KAPIL KHER Vs. BHARAT BIJLEE LIMITED 2. FAO(OS) 328/2013 ANU SINGH BHATIA PROSENJEET BANERJEE,PRINCY CM APPL. 11206/2013 Vs. PONTY SINGH PONNAN CM APPL. 11341/2013 3. FAO(OS) 44/2014 NORTHERN RAILWAY THR GENERAL JAGJIT SINGH MANAGER Vs. M/S PIONEER PUBLICITY CORPORATION PVT LTD 4. FAO(OS) 121/2014 NUSSLI SWITZERLAND LTD PRASHANT KUMAR,AMIT CM APPL. 4306/2014 Vs. ORGANIZING COMMITTEE SINGH,ARCHANA COMMONWEALTH GAMES, 2010 5. FAO(OS) 160/2014 HET RAM DECD THR LRS AND ORS SUSHANT KUMAR CM APPL. 5619/2014 Vs. INSTT OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR CM APPL. 5621/2014 AND ALLIED SCIENCES AND ORS 6. FAO(OS) 238/2014 GAURI SHANKAR (DECEASED) C.MOHAN RAO CM APPL. 8514/2014 THROUGH LRS. URMILA BAI AND ORS Vs. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. 7. FAO(OS) 247/2014 DEV AGRI FARMS PVT LTD SATYAJIT SARNA CM APPL. 8828/2014 Vs. MR SANJAY KAPUR AND ANR CM APPL. 8830/2014 8. FAO(OS) 268/2014 CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS B.V.NIREN CM APPL. 9640/2014 DEPARTMENT Vs. SMT. KANTA VASUDEV AND ORS 9. FAO(OS) 271/2014 SARJU KUMAR AJAY BAHL,JAGJIT SINGH Vs. BHARAMDUTT GUPTA AND ORS 10. FAO(OS) 293/2014 M/S JOY ALUKKAS TRADERS INDIA WILLS MATHEWS CM APPL. 10655/2014 PVT. LTD CM APPL. 10656/2014 Vs. PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL AND SONS (HUF) 28.07.2014 4 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 11. CRL.M.(BAIL) 772/2014 RAM NIWAS alias KALU R K ANAND (DHCLSC) In CRL.A. 939/2013 Vs. STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI 12. CRL.L.P. 335/2014 STATE SANJAY LAO CRL.M.A. 7809/2014 Vs. MOHD MURSHID AND ORS Other Case filed against same P.S.-FIR No. :(S.B.DAIRY-83/2008) BAIL APPLN. 1631/2010 filed by SACHCHU @ SACHIN (Disposed on : 04-MAY-11 ) P.S.-FIR No. :(S.B.DAIRY-83/2008) FOR ADMISSION _______________ 13. CRL.L.P. 315/2014 STATE SALEEM AHMED CRL.M.A. 7314/2014 Vs. RAVI KUMAR TYAGI AND ANR CRL.M.A. 7315/2014 Other Case filed against same P.S.-FIR No. :(ALIPUR-52/2008) BAIL APPLN. 906/2009 filed by PRADEEP KHATRI (Disposed on : 20-JAN-11 ) BAIL APPLN. / filed by RAVI KUMAR TYAGI (D. of Hearing : ) BAIL APPLN. 1160/2012 filed by PRADEEP KHATRI (Disposed on : 22-FEB-13 ) BAIL APPLN. 970/2012 filed by PRADEEP KHATRI (Disposed on : 09-JUL-12 ) CRL.A. 1564/2013 filed by PRADEEP KHATRI (D. of Hearing : 28-JUL-14 ) BAIL APPLN. 2632/2008 filed by PRADEEP KHATRI (Disposed on : 21-JAN-09 ) CRL.A. 1660/2013 filed by SMT CHELA DEVI (D. of Hearing : 27-JAN-14 ) P.S.-FIR No. :(ALIPUR-52/2008) 14. CRL.L.P. 342/2014 STATE SANJAY LAO CRL.M.A. 7961/2014 Vs. ANOOP SINGH P.S.-FIR No. :(OKHLA INDUSTRIAL AREA-160/2011) 15. CRL.L.P. 353/2014 STATE KUSUM DHALLA CRL.M.A. 8297/2014 Vs. MOHAN SINGH P.S.-FIR No. :(MANGOLPURI-176/2012) 16. CRL.L.P. 354/2014 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI LOVKESH SAWHNEY CRL.M.A. 8374/2014 Vs. ARVIND KUMAR JAISWAL AND ORS Other Case filed against same P.S.-FIR No. :(HARI NAGAR-57/2006) CRL.M.C. 3246/2010 filed by ARVIND @ THAKUR (Disposed on : 08-OCT-10 ) P.S.-FIR No. :(HARI NAGAR-57/2006) 17. CRL.A. 739/2014 ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. AVNINDER SINGH (DHCLSC) CRL.M.(BAIL) 1277/2014 Vs. STATE CRL.M.(BAIL) 1278/2014 CRL.M.(BAIL) 1279/2014 CRL.M.A. 9861/2014 CRL.M.A. 9862/2014 Other Case filed against same P.S.-FIR No. :(NEB SARAI-274/2009) BAIL APPLN. 1676/2012 filed by ANIL @ ANNU (Disposed on : 23-NOV-12 ) CRL.A. 307/2014 filed by ANIL @ ANNU (D. of Hearing : 05-MAY-14 ) P.S.-FIR No. :(NEB SARAI-274/2009) AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 18. CRL.A. 456/2012 RAMPHAL SINGH SHISHIR MATHUR,MOHIT CRL.M.A. 1427/2013 Vs. STATE AND ORS VERMA,SUMIT VERMA,MOHIT CRL.M.A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No.184 of 2014 Subramanian Swam
    1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.184 OF 2014 SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LAW & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 8 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 19 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 56 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 64 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 62 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 63 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 67 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 79 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 73 OF 2015 Page 1 2 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 82 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 77 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 91 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 98 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 106 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 96 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 110 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 121 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 120 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 117 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 118 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 116 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 119 OF 2015 TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS. 102-105 OF 2015 TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS. 94-101 OF 2015 Page 2 3 J U D G M E N T Dipak Misra, J. This batch of writ petitions preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India exposits cavil in its quintessential conceptuality and percipient discord between venerated and exalted right of freedom of speech and expression of an individual, exploring manifold and multilayered, limitless, unbounded and unfettered spectrums, and the controls, restrictions and constrictions, under the assumed power of “reasonableness” ingrained in the statutory provisions relating to criminal law to reviver and uphold one’s reputation.
    [Show full text]
  • '227 Statement by [ RAJYA SABHA ] Prime Minister 228 SHRI' VISHVJIT
    '227 Statement by [ RAJYA SABHA ] Prime Minister 228 STATEMENT BY PRIME MINISTER Recent deveplonments in Maldives SHRI' VISHVJIT P. SINGH THE PRIME MINISTER (SHRI RAJIV (Maharashtra): |Mr. Subramanian Swamy, GANDHI): Madam Deputy Chairman. where is Mr. Jethmalani today. ' SHRI JASWANT SINGH (Rajas-than): SHRI V. GOPALSAMY (Tamil Can we have copies? Nadu): On a point of order. Mem bers of Parliament should not wear THE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: It is not a very long statement. It does not matter. badges. It is against the rules. Some of the Members______Okay, he has re SHRI RAJIV GANDHI; We have some moved the Congress badge. problems with the copies because I though I should come to the House at the earliest occasion. If you want to wait for the copies, 1 am willing to delay the ^statement till the copies are ready and .given to you: I leave it to the House . (Interruptions)... We have only just completed the statement because the information has only just come in. I thought I would come straight to the House and let you have it... (Interruptions).. SHRI ALADI ARUNA alias V. ARUNACHALAM (Tamil Nadu); It is quite an unconvincing reply... (Interruptions) ... SHRI V. GOPALASAMY (Tamil Nadu): By now you could have given the copies. SHRI SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY: You are giving us spot news! SHRI RAJIV GANDHI: Madam Deputy Chairman, I rise to apprise the House about recent developments in the Maldives. In the morn, ing yesterday, we received reports that the capital of out friendly neighbour, the Maldives, was under attack from a group of mercenaries apparently recruited by disgruntled, expatriate Maldvian citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention of Femicide a Report by the Asmt Hindu Community April 2021
    PREVENTION OF FEMICIDE A REPORT BY THE ASMT HINDU COMMUNITY APRIL 2021 Introduction 1. The human rights situation for women and children in India1 is abysmal2. Despite tremendous public outcry3 against crimes against women and children such as rape, sexual violence, gender- based harassment, and female infanticide happen unabated in India. The State of the Republic of India has been either unwilling or unable to curtail these crimes. India is the most dangerous country for sexual violence against women, according to the Thomson Reuters Foundation 2018 survey.4 According to the National Crimes Records Bureau, the rape of minor girls increased by 82% in the year 2016 compared with the previous year.5 2. Sexual violence and brutal rape have been weaponized against minority women and children by extremist militant elements at the highest levels of governance. This weaponization of sexual violence targeting women and children is part of a more pervasive and systematic campaign targeting certain indigenous spiritual traditions, minority communities, and their leaders,6 especially those from linguistic and religious minority groups, and of dark-skinned people of indigenous spiritual traditions, and of ethnic native-Hindu tribes that have existed in India for millennia.7 One such indigenous spiritual tradition currently targeted for extermination by the Neo-Hindutva8 extremist militants is the Hindu Adi Shaiva Minority Tradition (“ASMT”) in India. The women, children, and young girls of the ASMT community were the most vulnerable target of the Neo-Hindutva extremism. 3. The ASMT explicitly rejects extremism of all types. The extremist militant elements are opposed9 to ASMT’s stance when it comes to the rights of women10, including otherwise marginalized Dalit women, and the rights of members of the LGBTQ+ and transgendered communities11.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 SCR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY V
    [2012] 11 S.C.R. 873 874 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 S.C.R. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY A A Ministers – A wrong judgment or an inaccurate or incorrect v. approach or poor management, by itself cannot be said to be A. RAJA a product of criminal conspiracy – In view of the materials on (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1688 of 2012 etc.) record, it cannot be said that Finance Minister had misused his position or conspired or colluded with the Telecom AUGUST 24, 2012 B B Minister so as to fix low entry fee by non-visiting spectrum [G.S. SINGHVI AND K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ.] charges fixed in the year 2001 – No materials were made available even for a prima facie conclusion that the Finance SCAM: Minister had deliberately allowed dilution of equity of the two companies – There is also no material made available to 2G Spectrum Scam – Complaint by the appellant before C C conclude that the Finance Minister abused his official position Special Judge CBI to set in motion provisions of Prevention or used any corrupt or illegal means for obtaining any of Corruption Act, against the then Telecom Minister – During pecuniary advantage for himself or for any other person – No examination u/s. 200 Cr.P.C.,the appellant made allegation case is made out against him. that the then Finance Minister and the Telecom Minister were jointly and severely responsible for the scam – Prayer for Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Ors. etc. v. Union D D making the Finance Minister an accused and for carrying out of India and Ors.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification
    (TO BE PUBLISHED IN GAZETTE EXTRA ORDINARY, PART 1 – SEC.1) Government of India Ministry of Culture (Special Cell) Notification New Delhi, the 24th September, 2016 F.No. 19-1/2015- Special Cell – To commemorate the Birth Centenary of Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya in a befitting manner, the Competent Authority has approved the constitution of a National Committee. The composition of the National Committee is as under:- NATIONAL COMMITTEE Chairman 1. Shri Narendra Modi, Hon’ble Prime Minister of India Members 2. Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Fr PM, Bharat Ratna 3. Shri H D Deve Gowda, Fr PM of India 4. Smt. Sumitra Mahajan, Speaker of Lok Sabha 5. Shri Rajnath Singh, Home Minister 6. Smt. Sushma Swaraj, External Affairs Minister 7. Shri Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister 8. Shri Manohar Parikkar, Defence Minister 9. Shri Venkaiah Naidu, Urban Development Minister 10. Shri Nitin Gadkari, Minister of Road Transport & Highways & Shipping 11. Shri Suresh Prabhu, Minister of Railways 12. Shri Ram Vilas Paswan, Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution 13. Shri Kalraj Mishra, Minister of MSME 14. Shri Jual Oram, Minister of Tribal Affairs 15. Shri Thaawar Chand Gehlot, Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment 16. Shri Prakash Javadekar, Minister of Human Resource Development 17. Ms Lata Mangeshkar, Bharat Ratna 18. Shri Mahesh Sharma, MoS (IC), Culture 19. Shri Anil Madhav Dave, Environment Minister - MoS (IC) 20. Shri L K Advani, Fr Dy. PM 21. Smt. Mridula Sinha, Governor of Goa 22. Prof. O P Kohli, Governor of Gujarat 23. Prof. Kaptan Singh Solanki, Governor of Haryana 24. Shri Acharya Devvrat, Governor of Himachal Pradesh 25.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Rights Communiqué Your Monthly Dose on Human Rights (Newsletter for Centre for Advanced Studies in Human Rights, Rgnul, Punjab) 2222
    THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMUNIQUÉ YOUR MONTHLY DOSE ON HUMAN RIGHTS (NEWSLETTER FOR CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN HUMAN RIGHTS, RGNUL, PUNJAB) 2222 Vol.I, Issue IV November, 2014 PATRON – IN – CHIEF: • Prof. (Dr.) Paramjit S. Jaswal Vice – Chancellor, RGNUL, Punjab PATRON: • Prof. (Dr.) G.I.S. Sandhu Registrar, RGNUL, Punjab EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR – IN - CHIEF: SEXUAL ABUSE AGAINST CHILDREN: • Dr. Shilpa Jain PROTECTION & PREVENTPREVENTIONIONIONION STUDENT EDITORS: It was 19 November 2010 when a global initiative to protect children from abuse and violence received the support of the United Nations on the anniversary of the Convention on the Rights of the • Ms. Shelly Mittal Child and it was adopted as a World Day for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Violence against • Mr. Dharav Shah Children. This reminds us that much needs to be done as prevention is crucial in preventing the child • Mr. Sourabh abuse and violence. Child abuse is a violation of the basic human rights of a child and is an outcome of a set of inter- CASIHR COMMITTEE : related familial, social, psychological and economic factors. The problem of child abuse and human rights violations is one of the most critical matters on the international human rights agenda. Child • Ms. Aishwarya Malik abuse is a state of emotional, physical, economic and sexual maltreatment meted out to a person • Ms. Riya Prem Raaj below the age of eighteen and is a globally prevalent phenomenon. However, in India, as in many • Ms. Isha Singh other countries, there has been an effort for understanding of the extent, magnitude and trends of the • Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 7 National Late Front 09.Qxd
    BHUBANESWAR SATURDAY, JULY 7, 2012 | 7 National PINKI CASE Oppn MPs to Bengal Govt Jindal planned meet CEC on told to file Pranab today affidavit another 26/11 New Delhi, July 6: Janata Party Chief Subramanian Swamy Kolkata, July 6: The Calcutta and BJD MP Bhartuhari Mahtab High Court Friday directed will meet Chief Election the West Bengal Government type strike Commissioner (CEC) V S to file an affidavit within two Sampath Saturday to complain weeks on the progress of in- New Delhi, July 6: Abu Jindal ‘‘Jindal was deputed against the Presidential poll vestigation to determine the gen- Hamza, one of the handlers of by the LeT to help Returning Officer’s order rejecting der of athlete Pinki Pramanik. 26/11 attackers, was planning the Opposition demand for A division bench of Chief a similar strike with an Indian the IM in assembling scrapping Pranab Mukherjee’s Justice J N Patel and Justice Mujahideen (IM) module that arms and ammuni- candidature for allegedly hold- S Chakraborty also directed he was setting up when he tion to carry out ing an Office of Profit. the prosecution to produce a was nabbed in Saudi Arabia. another 26/11-type Swamy and Mahtab will rep- case diary in the matter on the During Jindal’s 15-day ques- resent Opposition-backed can- next date of hearing. The tioning, he told investigators terror attack in didate PA Sangma on the issue Court's direction came in re- that the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) India,” an officer said before the CEC. Sangma and sponse to a PIL application to which he belonged had links his camp are not satisfied with in the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Vedanta and Buddhism Final Enlightenment in Early Buddhism Frank Hoffman, West Chester University
    Welcome to the Nineteenth International Congress of Vedanta being held on the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth campus. It is very exciting to think that the Vedanta Congress now is being held in the land of the “Boston Brahmins” Thoreau, Emerson and Whitman. It is very heartening to note that a large number of scholars are regular attendees of the Vedanta Congress, several are coming from India. We wel- come them all and are committed to help them in any way we can, to make their stay in Dartmouth pleasant and memorable. Our most appreciative thanks are due to Rajiv Malhotra and the Infinity Foun- dation and Pandit Ramsamooj of 3 R's Foundation for their generous financial support for holding the conference. We are particularly grateful to Anthony Garro, Provost, and William Hogan, Dean of College of Arts and Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth for his continuous support of the Center for Indic Studies. Our special thanks to Maureen Jennings, Center's Administrative Assistant and a number of faculty and students (especially Deepti Mehandru and Shwetha Bhat) who have worked hard in the planning and organization of this conference. Bal Ram Singh S.S. Rama Rao Pappu Nineteenth International Congress of Vedanta July 28-31, 2010 - Program NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF VEDANTA PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, JULY 28, 2010 All sessions to be held in Woodland Commons 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM Conference Registration Desk Open – Woodland Commons Lobby 8:00 AM - 8:30 AM Social/Coffee/Tea – Woodland Commons Lobby 8:45 AM Invocation & Vedic Chanting 9:00 AM Benediction 9:10 AM Welcome Address, Dean William Hogan, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth 9:20 AM Introduction, Conference Directors - Bal Ram Singh, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth S.
    [Show full text]
  • 69 Re Expulsion of [ 15 NOV. 1976 ] Shri Subramanian Swamy 70 from the House Them but Mr. Subramanian Swamy Has Brought De
    69 Re expulsion of [ 15 NOV. 1976 ] Shri Subramanian Swamy 70 from the House them but Mr. Subramanian Swamy has Swamy was what the world will hereafter brought delinquency to the proceedings of this remember is that this Parliament was bold House in the past and we should also not enough, when it came to the protection of the forget his very behaviour here on the day when privileges and rights of this House, it took he marked his attendance last and when the firm action and put down, for all times, such Obituary was being read out by yourself, how, machinations which would destroy the fabric the House knows it, he raised a point of order of the parliamentary institutions in our and ran away. Is this the way for which he eo"untry. wants protection? Sir, if we want protection we must also know how to obey and how to Sir, I support the Motion. listen to the rulings and submit to the dignity SHRI KALI MUKHERJEE (West Bengal): of this House. And the same thing applies to It is a shame that of all persons Mr. Krishan the proceedings which have been initiated Kant has taken the brief of Mr. Swamy's case thereafter. He had ample opportunity to come, and his gang. he had ample opportunity to justify, and if he felt at that time, when he entered the House MR. CHAIRMAN: The House stands last, that he needed protection, I am sure, he adjourned till 2.20 P.M. could have come to you and said, "Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2G Spectrum.Pdf
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 423 OF 2010 Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others …Petitioners versus Union of India and others …Respondents With WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10 OF 2011 Dr. Subramanian Swamy …Petitioner versus Union of India and others …Respondents J U D G M E N T G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. The important questions which arise for consideration in these petitions, one of which has been filed by Centre for Public Interest Litigation, a registered Society formed by Shri V.M. Tarkunde (former Judge of the Bombay High Court) for taking up causes of public interest and conducting public interest litigation in an organised manner, Lok Satta, a registered Society dedicated to 2 political governance, reforms and fight against corruption, Telecom Watchdog and Common Cause, both Non-Governmental Organisations registered as Societies for taking up issues of public importance and national interest, Sarva Shri J.M. Lingdoh, T.S. Krishnamurthi and N. Gopalasamy, all former Chief Election Commissioners, P. Shanker, former Central Vigilance Commissioner, Julio F. Ribero, former member of the Indian Police Service, who served as Director General of Police, Gujarat, Punjab and C.R.P.F. and Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, P.G. Thakurta, an eminent Senior Journalist and visiting faculty member of various institutions including IIMs, IIT, FTII, IIFT, Delhi University, Jawaharlal Nehru University and Jamia Milia Islamia University and Admiral R.H. Tahiliyani, former Chief of Naval Staff, former Governor and former Chairman of Transparency International India and the other has been filed by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Subramanian Swamy.Pmd
    Indian Journal of Economics & Business, Special Issue China & India (2006) : 1-... FINANCIAL SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS IN CHINA AND INDIA A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY Harvard University China and India are currently among the fastest growing economies in the globe. Continued growth at the current rates or higher, has enormous implications for the globalisation process underway and the consequent re-structuring of world economic order itself. However, economic history is strewn with examples of countries such as in Latin America and lately in East Asia that had grown promisingly at first but only to falter later and fall behind because of an economic crisis. Such countries have been therefore unable to regain their earlier momentum. On the other hand, the US and West European nations constitute another category of nations which grew in a sustained way to become and remain by modern standards developed countries. Focusing on the financial sector, this paper explores the question: into which category of nations will India and China fall? I. INTRODUCTION China and India are currently among the fastest growing economies in the globe. Together the two nations represent 38 percent of the global population. Continued growth of the worlds second and fourth largest economies respectively [measured by PPP based GNP] at the current rates or higher, has enormous implications for the globalisation process underway and the consequent re-structuring of world economic order itself. In 1997-98, several of the most dynamic and fast growing East Asian economies suffered severe financial crisis that devastated them. This event revealed that growing economies could not be sustained with a weak financial system.
    [Show full text]
  • Newspaper Clips Sept
    Page 1 of 8 Newspaper Clips Sept. 24, 2015 Page 2 of 8 Page 3 of 8 NIT Rourkela head suspends registrar http://www.thestatesman.com/news/odisha/nit-rourkela-head-suspends-registrar/92173.html In an unusual move the Director of National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, has suspended the Registrar of the prestigious institute for alleged insubordination and dereliction of duty. In an intra mail the Director, Sunil Sarangi has intimated the staff that the Registrar Santosdh Kumar Upadhyaya has been suspended. When contacted Sarangi said: “I had to take the ultimate step as there was no way out. He has been suspended for insubordination and dereliction of duty. His activities were unbecoming of his post due to which I had to take such a step”. The Director also informed that the suspension has been ordered as per the statute of the institute. “The 26(1) clause mentions that the Director has the power to suspend the Registrar and I have done it within the ambit of law”, said Sarangi. “The whole aim of the suspension was not to let any negative atmosphere prevail in the campus”, he said. The Registrar, however, said: “I am the secretary of the Board of Governors and I had to communicate certain decisions of the Board as well as certain circulars and orders to the Director in my capacity as secretary who acts on behalf of the Board.” The Director wanted the orders to be revoked and pressurised me to do so, said the Registrar. Following this the Director issued instructions that the orders of the Registrar did not have necessary sanctions as per the rule, added the Registrar.
    [Show full text]