Tropical Birding 2013 Yucatán Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tropical Birding 2013 Yucatán Report The YUCATÁN, the LACANDÓN, and COZUMEL 18 Jan–1 Feb 2013 Leader: Michael Retter Photos by Michael Retter There were a couple alterations to the tour this year, and for the better, I think. Cozumel was included as part of the main tour rather than just an extension, and we took a boat ride up into the pristine Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve. As a result, we had good looks at all of the endemic species and most of the endemic subspecies on Cozumel, and enjoyed thrilling ride up the rushing crystal waters of the Río Tzendales. Along the way, we saw some great birds, such as Scaled Pigeon and King Vulture. While birding the Río Usumacinta marshes on the last day, we had the good fortune to be invited by a kindly farmer to drive around on the levees throughout thousands of acres of rice fields, which afforded us some stellar views of immense numbers of birds. We tallied hundreds of herons, egrets, and Fork-tailed Flycatchers, and clouds of thousands of Grassland Yellow-finches. But of course, the awe-inspiring Maya ruins are the main draw for many who come on this tour, and prolonged views of them are practically guaranteed! 18 Jan Arrival in Cancún 19 Jan A. B. Marín Botanical Gardens to Cozumel 20 Jan Cozumel and Chichén Itzá 21 Jan Río Lagartos (desert scrub and mangrove boat trip) 22 Jan Cobá to Felipe Carillo Puerto 23 Jan Felipe Carillo Puerto to Xpujil 24 Jan Calakmul 25 Jan Calakmul to Palenque via Río Usumacinta marshes 26 Jan Palenque 27 Jan Bonampak 28 Jan Yaxchilán 29 Jan Bonampak to Las Guacamayas 30 Jan Río Tzendales 31 Jan Palenque to Villahermosa via Río Usumacinta marshes 1 Feb Departure from Villahermosa . The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 1 - Summary The A.B. Marín Botanical Gardens is a perfect place to start this tour. It’s a short drive from the hotel and on the way to the Cozumel ferry. As is usually the case in January in Mexico, wintering warblers were in abundance. Some of the first birds we saw were Yellow-throated Warbler, Northern Parula, and Northern Waterthrush in the garden’s parking lot. As luck would have it, an army ant swarm was crossing the trail in the native forest portion of the property. Red-throated Ant-tanager, Yucatán Jay, Kentucky Warbler, Hooded Warbler, and Black Catbird (above) all put on a show. We took the ferry over to Cozumel in the afternoon, and had some nice birds in the parking lot of the hotel when we arrived: Carribean Elania, Green-breasted Mango, more Black Catbirds, and a handsome male Cozumel Emerald. We birded a nice tract of native forest next next morning, and easily picked up the remaining endemic species: Cozumel Vireo and Cozumel Wren. We also saw a number of endemic subspecies and Carribean species, such as “Cozumel” Gnatcatcher, “Cozumel” Peppershrike, Yucatán Vireo, White-crowned Pigeon, Caribbean Dove, Western Spindalis, and flowering a tree full of dozens of “Cozumel” Bananaquits. After crossing back over on the ferry and a delicious meal of Yucatecan barbecue, it was off to the incomparable Chichén Itzá and its famous El Castillo pyramid (left). Our visit was timed perfectly for the golden, evening light. The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 2 - The desert-like habitat along the northern coast of the peninsula offered us a suite of species not seen elsewhere on the trip. Near Río Lagartos we found Yucatán Wren, Yucatán Bobwhite, Orange Oriole, Zenaida Dove, Cinnamon Hummingbird, and Lesser Roadrunner. Prolonged views of Yucatán Jay and Mexican Sheartail (right) were especially memorable. We spent the afternoon out on the Ría Lagartos, among the mangroves, salt pans, and flocks of the intensely coral American Flamingos (below, with Lesser Yellow-headed Vulture). We also had nice views of a white morph reddish egret, some American Oystercatchers, and a Bare-throated Tiger-Heron. The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 3 - A visit to the Cobá ruins was in store the next morning, and we readily found our main target there: the endemic Rose-throated Tanager. Continuing south, we abruptly turned the van around to ogle a striking Turquoise-browed Motmot. Persistence paid off this evening, as we carefully checked dozens and dozens of parrots streaming by the outskirts of Felipe Carillo Puerto. We finally found a male that lacked green lesser primary coverts and had yellow lores qnd a dark ear patch, making it a Yucatán Parrot (above right) rather than the ubiquitous White-fronted. We started out very early the next morning in order to do some night birding, and were rewarded with a couple singing Yucatán Poorwills. Unfortunately, it started to rain shortly after dawn, which markedly depressed bird activity. We still managed excellent views of a few targets, though: Yucatán Flycatcher, Green-backed Sparrow and Campylopterus pampa, a new IOC split called Wedge-tailed Sabrewing. After lunch, we drove south and west to Xpujil for the night. The next morning we set out for Calakmul, one of my favorite birding locations in all of Middle America. Great birding and what is perhaps the Maya word’s most impressive ruins. What more could you ask for! The Ocellated Turkeys (left) preformed on cue, displaying in the Gran Plaza and even hopping up the vine-covered steps of the huge pyramid! We headed back to Xpujil for the late afternoon, where we visited the ruins of the same name, conveniently located across the road from our hotel. The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 4 - Another morning along the entrance road to Calakmul (within the massive biosphere reserve) was very productive, especially our time spent at another army ant swarm. As is typical in this part of the word, it was attended by a couple Gray-throated Chats (female at left). Also present were Roadside Hawk, White-browed Wren, Hooded Warbler, Magnolia Warbler, Red-throated Ant-tanager, Ruddy Woodcreeper, Groove-billed Ani, Melodious Blackbird, Tawny-winged Woodcreeper, and a surprising second view of Rose-throated Tanager. We headed west as it began to get warm (pausing along the way for a troop of coatis), and had lunch at a nice restaurant along the shores of the Laguna de Silvituc (below). While we waited for our food, we birded along the edge of the lake and found dozens of Snail Kites, Purple Gallinules, Mangrove Swallows, and Northern Jaçanas. The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 5 - Watching the flooded fields and ditches on our westward journey through the Usumacinta floodplain yielded many heron, egrets, ibises, and the like. Bat Falcon, Aplomado Falcon, White-tailed Hawk, and Limpkin were also nice finds, but a huge Jabiru (right)—extremely rare in Mexico—was by far the best find. We awoke the next morning in Chiapas, not far from the entrance to the famous Palenque ruins (below). Spectacular as always, they contain some particularly distinctive architecture not found elsewhere in the Maya world. The avian highlight of our visit was a fruiting fig full of honeycreepers, Collared Araçaris, Masked Tityras, Keel-billed Toucans, and Golden-hooded and Yellow-winged tanagers. It was also interesting to watch an Aztec Parakeet seemingly eating the wood pulp from the top of a termite nest. Bonampak, in the rich Lacandón Rainforest, was our birding location the following morning. We intersected a rather cooperative and diverse mid-story flock as it crossed over the road. Gray- headed Tanager, Black- throated Shrike-Tanager Plain Xenops, Plain Antvireo, Dot- winged Antwren, Tawny- . The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 6 - crowned Greenlet, Royal Flycatcher… I’m sure I’ve forgotten a few! Out on the landing strip, flowering vines draped in the trees yielded Black-crested Coquette, Purple-crowned Fairy, Black-cowled Oriole, and Green Honeycreeper. A male Blue Ground-Dove responded nicely to playback, and we found Barred Antshrike and Dusky Antbird in the thickets. We made sure we were still in the open area at hawk-eagle o’clock (10:30), and were treated to three White Hawks, a pair of Double-toothed Kites, and a Black Hawk-Eagle. When the raptor show was over, we headed a bit further into the complex to view the stunning Maya paintings (above) which Bonampak is famous for. But on the way, a small flock caught our attention. I honestly can’t remember what most of the birds were, though, because it was in this flock that the rarest bird of the trip was found: Mexico’s second record of White-winged Becard (a female). Unfortunately, both it and the flock disappeared very quickly, and no one managed a photograph. We boarded a motorized canoe and headed down the fog- enshrouded Río Usumacinta (left) at dawn the next day. Our destination was the remote ruins site of Yaxchilán. One of the nice things about this site is that most of the tourist groups don’t arrive until mid- morning (and those groups are few . The YUCATÁN and the LACANDÓN 25 July–9 August 2011 - 7 - and far between), so you have the place to yourself for most of the morning. A quick check of the landing strip produced a large mixed flock of Variable Seedeaters and Indigo and Painted buntings, a pair of Rufous-breasted Spinetails, both tody- flycatchers, and the very scare Yellow-tailed Oriole. In the ruins complex proper we found Scaly-breasted Hummingbird, Mealy Parrot, White-whiskered Puffbird, and Rufous-tailed Jacamar. Another vigil at hawk-eagle o’clock yielded only a King Vulture (right).
Recommended publications
  • Costa Rica 2020
    Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Photos: Talamanca Hummingbird, Sunbittern, Resplendent Quetzal, Congenial Group! Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Leaders: Frank Mantlik & Vernon Campos Report and photos by Frank Mantlik Highlights and top sightings of the trip as voted by participants Resplendent Quetzals, multi 20 species of hummingbirds Spectacled Owl 2 CR & 32 Regional Endemics Bare-shanked Screech Owl 4 species Owls seen in 70 Black-and-white Owl minutes Suzy the “owling” dog Russet-naped Wood-Rail Keel-billed Toucan Great Potoo Tayra!!! Long-tailed Silky-Flycatcher Black-faced Solitaire (& song) Rufous-browed Peppershrike Amazing flora, fauna, & trails American Pygmy Kingfisher Sunbittern Orange-billed Sparrow Wayne’s insect show-and-tell Volcano Hummingbird Spangle-cheeked Tanager Purple-crowned Fairy, bathing Rancho Naturalista Turquoise-browed Motmot Golden-hooded Tanager White-nosed Coati Vernon as guide and driver January 29 - Arrival San Jose All participants arrived a day early, staying at Hotel Bougainvillea. Those who arrived in daylight had time to explore the phenomenal gardens, despite a rain storm. Day 1 - January 30 Optional day-trip to Carara National Park Guides Vernon and Frank offered an optional day trip to Carara National Park before the tour officially began and all tour participants took advantage of this special opportunity. As such, we are including the sightings from this day trip in the overall tour report. We departed the Hotel at 05:40 for the drive to the National Park. En route we stopped along the road to view a beautiful Turquoise-browed Motmot.
    [Show full text]
  • Maya Knowledge and "Science Wars"
    Journal of Ethnobiology 20(2); 129-158 Winter 2000 MAYA KNOWLEDGE AND "SCIENCE WARS" E. N. ANDERSON Department ofAnthropology University ofCalifornia, Riverside Riverside, CA 92521~0418 ABSTRACT.-Knowledge is socially constructed, yet humans succeed in knowing a great deal about their environments. Recent debates over the nature of "science" involve extreme positions, from claims that allscience is arbitrary to claims that science is somehow a privileged body of truth. Something may be learned by considering the biological knowledge of a very different culture with a long record of high civilization. Yucatec Maya cthnobiology agrees with contemporary international biological science in many respects, almost all of them highly specific, pragmatic and observational. It differs in many other respects, most of them highly inferential and cosmological. One may tentatively conclude that common observation of everyday matters is more directly affected by interaction with the nonhuman environment than is abstract deductive reasoning. but that social factors operate at all levels. Key words: Yucatec Maya, ethnoornithology, science wars, philosophy ofscience, Yucatan Peninsula RESUMEN.-EI EI conocimiento es una construcci6n social, pero los humanos pueden aprender mucho ce sus alrededores. Discursos recientes sobre "ciencia" incluyen posiciones extremos; algunos proponen que "ciencia" es arbitrario, otros proponen que "ciencia" es verdad absoluto. Seria posible conocer mucho si investiguemos el conocimiento biol6gico de una cultura, muy difcrente, con una historia larga de alta civilizaci6n. EI conodrniento etnobiol6gico de los Yucatecos conformc, mas 0 menos, con la sciencia contemporanea internacional, especial mente en detallas dcrivadas de la experiencia pragmatica. Pero, el es deferente en otros respectos-Ios que derivan de cosmovisi6n 0 de inferencia logical.
    [Show full text]
  • Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan
    University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland Institut of Zoology Ecology of the Black Catbird, Melanoptila glabrirostris, at Shipstern Nature Reserve (Belize), and distribution in Yucatan. J.Laesser Annick Morgenthaler May 2003 Master thesis supervised by Prof. Claude Mermod and Dr. Louis-Félix Bersier CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Aim and description of the study 2. Geographic setting 2.1. Yucatan peninsula 2.2. Belize 2.3. Shipstern Nature Reserve 2.3.1. History and previous studies 2.3.2. Climate 2.3.3. Geology and soils 2.3.4. Vegetation 2.3.5. Fauna 3. The Black Catbird 3.1. Taxonomy 3.2. Description 3.3. Breeding 3.4. Ecology and biology 3.5. Distribution and threats 3.6. Current protection measures FIRST PART: BIOLOGY, HABITAT AND DENSITY AT SHIPSTERN 4. Materials and methods 4.1. Census 4.1.1. Territory mapping 4.1.2. Transect point-count 4.2. Sizing and ringing 4.3. Nest survey (from hide) 5. Results 5.1. Biology 5.1.1. Morphometry 5.1.2. Nesting 5.1.3. Diet 5.1.4. Competition and predation 5.2. Habitat use and population density 5.2.1. Population density 5.2.2. Habitat use 5.2.3. Banded individuals monitoring 5.2.4. Distribution through the Reserve 6. Discussion 6.1. Biology 6.2. Habitat use and population density SECOND PART: DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS THROUGHOUT THE RANGE 7. Materials and methods 7.1. Data collection 7.2. Visit to others sites 8. Results 8.1. Data compilation 8.2. Visited places 8.2.1. Corozalito (south of Shipstern lagoon) 8.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Belize and Tikal Tour 1
    Belize and Tikal Guides: Ernesto Carman, Eagle-Eye Tours February 4 - 13, 2019 Jared Clarke BIRD SPECIES Seen/ Common Name Scientific Name Heard TINAMIFORMES: Tinamidae 1 Great Tinamou Tinamus major H 2 Slaty-breasted Tinamou Crypturellus boucardi H 3 Little Tinamou Crypturellus soui H ANSERIFORMES: Anatidae 4 Black-bellied Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis 1 5 Fulvous Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna bicolor 1 6 Blue-winged Teal Spatula discors 1 7 Ring-necked Duck Aythya collaris 1 8 Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis 1 GALLIFORMES: Odontophoridae 9 Black-throated Bobwhite Colinus nigrogularis 1 GALLIFORMES: Cracidae 10 Plain Chachalaca Ortalis vetula 1 11 Crested Guan Penelope purpurascens 1 12 Great Curassow Crax rubra 1 GALLIFORMES: Phasianidae 13 Ocellated Turkey Meleagris ocellata 1 PODICIPEDIFORMES: Podicipedidae 14 Least Grebe Tachybaptus dominicus 1 15 Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps 1 CICONIIFORMES: Ciconiidae 16 Jabiru Jabiru mycteria 1 17 Wood Stork Mycteria americana 1 SULIFORMES: Fregatidae 18 Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens 1 SULIFORMES: Phalacrocoracidae 19 NeotroPic Cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus 1 SULIFORMES: Anhingidae 20 Anhinga Anhinga anhinga 1 PELECANIFORMES: Pelecanidae 21 American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos 1 22 Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis 1 PELECANIFORMES: Ardeidae 23 Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens 1 24 Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis 1 25 Bare-throated Tiger-Heron Tigrisoma mexicanum 1 Page 1 of 11 Belize and Tikal Guides: Ernesto Carman, Eagle-Eye Tours February 4 - 13,
    [Show full text]
  • Checklistccamp2016.Pdf
    2 3 Participant’s Name: Tour Company: Date#1: / / Tour locations Date #2: / / Tour locations Date #3: / / Tour locations Date #4: / / Tour locations Date #5: / / Tour locations Date #6: / / Tour locations Date #7: / / Tour locations Date #8: / / Tour locations Codes used in Column A Codes Sample Species a = Abundant Red-lored Parrot c = Common White-headed Wren u = Uncommon Gray-cheeked Nunlet r = Rare Sapayoa vr = Very rare Wing-banded Antbird m = Migrant Bay-breasted Warbler x = Accidental Dwarf Cuckoo (E) = Endemic Stripe-cheeked Woodpecker Species marked with an asterisk (*) can be found in the birding areas visited on the tour outside of the immediate Canopy Camp property such as Nusagandi, San Francisco Reserve, El Real and Darien National Park/Cerro Pirre. Of course, 4with incredible biodiversity and changing environments, there is always the possibility to see species not listed here. If you have a sighting not on this list, please let us know! No. Bird Species 1A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Tinamous Great Tinamou u 1 Tinamus major Little Tinamou c 2 Crypturellus soui Ducks Black-bellied Whistling-Duck 3 Dendrocygna autumnalis u Muscovy Duck 4 Cairina moschata r Blue-winged Teal 5 Anas discors m Curassows, Guans & Chachalacas Gray-headed Chachalaca 6 Ortalis cinereiceps c Crested Guan 7 Penelope purpurascens u Great Curassow 8 Crax rubra r New World Quails Tawny-faced Quail 9 Rhynchortyx cinctus r* Marbled Wood-Quail 10 Odontophorus gujanensis r* Black-eared Wood-Quail 11 Odontophorus melanotis u Grebes Least Grebe 12 Tachybaptus dominicus u www.canopytower.com 3 BirdChecklist No.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness and Utility of Acoustic Recordings for Surveying Tropical Birds Antonio Celis-Murillo University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research & Creative Activity Biological Sciences January 2012 Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds Antonio Celis-Murillo University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Jill L. Deppe Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Michael P. Ward University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Celis-Murillo, Antonio; Deppe, Jill L.; and Ward, Michael P., "Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds" (2012). Faculty Research & Creative Activity. 153. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research & Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Field Ornithology J. Field Ornithol. 83(2):166–179, 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2012.00366.x Effectiveness and utility of acoustic recordings for surveying tropical birds Antonio Celis-Murillo1,2,3,5 Jill L. Deppe4 and Michael P. Ward2,3 1School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61821, USA 2Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61821, USA 3Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61821, USA 4Eastern Illinois University, Department of Biological Sciences, Charleston, Illinois 61920, USA Received 21 September 2011; accepted 20 February 2012 ABSTRACT. Although acoustic recordings have recently gained popularity as an alternative to point counts for surveying birds, little is known about the relative performance of the two methods for detecting tropical bird species across multiple vegetation types.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Contents
    Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU CONTENTS CONTENTS PERU, THE NATURAL DESTINATION BIRDS Northern Region Lambayeque, Piura and Tumbes Amazonas and Cajamarca Cordillera Blanca Mountain Range Central Region Lima and surrounding areas Paracas Huánuco and Junín Southern Region Nazca and Abancay Cusco and Machu Picchu Puerto Maldonado and Madre de Dios Arequipa and the Colca Valley Puno and Lake Titicaca PRIMATES Small primates Tamarin Marmosets Night monkeys Dusky titi monkeys Common squirrel monkeys Medium-sized primates Capuchin monkeys Saki monkeys Large primates Howler monkeys Woolly monkeys Spider monkeys MARINE MAMMALS Main species BUTTERFLIES Areas of interest WILD FLOWERS The forests of Tumbes The dry forest The Andes The Hills The cloud forests The tropical jungle www.peru.org.pe [email protected] 1 Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU ORCHIDS Tumbes and Piura Amazonas and San Martín Huánuco and Tingo María Cordillera Blanca Chanchamayo Valley Machu Picchu Manu and Tambopata RECOMMENDATIONS LOCATION AND CLIMATE www.peru.org.pe [email protected] 2 Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU Peru, The Natural Destination Peru is, undoubtedly, one of the world’s top desti- For Peru, nature-tourism and eco-tourism repre- nations for nature-lovers. Blessed with the richest sent an opportunity to share its many surprises ocean in the world, largely unexplored Amazon for- and charm with the rest of the world. This guide ests and the highest tropical mountain range on provides descriptions of the main groups of species Pthe planet, the possibilities for the development of the country offers nature-lovers; trip recommen- bio-diversity in its territory are virtually unlim- dations; information on destinations; services and ited.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Panama Tour
    Eagle-Eye Tours Panama - Canal Zone and Burbayar Lodge Tour Leader: January 2013 Hector Gomez de Silva Common Name Latin Name Seen/ Heard TINAMOUS 1 Little Tinamou Crypturellus soui s 2 Great Tinamou Tinamus major h DUCKS, GEESE, AND WATERFOWL 3 Blue-winged Teal Anas discors s 4 Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis s GUANS, CHACHALACAS, AND CURASSOWS 5 Gray-headed Chachalaca Ortalis cinereiceps s GREBES 6 Least Grebe Tachybaptus dominicus s STORKS 7 Wood Stork Mycteria americana s FRIGATEBIRDS 8 Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens s CORMORANTS AND SHAGS 9 Neotropic Cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus s ANHINGAS 10 Anhinga Anhinga anhinga s PELICANS 11 Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis s HERONS, EGRETS, AND BITTERNS 12 Fasciated Tiger-Heron Tigrisoma fasciatum s 13 Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias s 14 Great Egret Ardea alba s 15 Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea s 16 Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis s 17 Green Heron Butorides virescens s 18 Striated Heron Butorides striata s NEW WORLD VULTURES 19 Black Vulture Coragyps atratus s 20 Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura s 21 King Vulture Sarcoramphus papa s OSPREY 22 Osprey Pandion haliaetus s HAWKS, EAGLES, AND KITES 23 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus s 24 Black Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus tyrannus s 25 Double-toothed Kite Harpagus bidentatus s 26 Savanna Hawk Buteogallus meridionalis s 27 White Hawk Pseudastur albicollis s 28 Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus s 29 Gray-lined Hawk Buteo nitidus s 30 Short-tailed Hawk Buteo brachyurus s RAILS, GALLINULES, AND COOTS 31 White-throated Crake Laterallus
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
    version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection.
    [Show full text]
  • AOS) Committee on Classification and Nomenclature: North and Middle America (NACC) 3 June 2020
    American Ornithological Society (AOS) Committee on Classification and Nomenclature: North and Middle America (NACC) 3 June 2020 Guidelines for English bird names The American Ornithological Society’s North American Classification Committee (NACC) has long held responsibility for arbitrating the official names of birds that occur within its area of geographic coverage. Scientific names used are in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999); the committee has no discretion to modify scientific names that adhere to ICZN rules. English names for species are developed and maintained in keeping with the following guidelines, which are used when forming English names for new or recently split species and when considering proposals to change established names for previously known species: A. Principles and Procedures 1. Stability of English names. The NACC recognizes that there are substantial benefits to nomenclatural stability and that long-established English names should only be changed after careful deliberation and for good cause. As detailed in AOU (1983), NACC policy is to “retain well established names for well-known and widely distributed species, even if the group name or a modifier is not precisely accurate, universally appropriate, or descriptively the best possible.” The NACC has long interpreted this policy as a caution against the ever-present temptation to ‘improve’ well-established English names and this remains an important principle. In practice, this means that proposals to the NACC advocating a change to a long-established English name must present a strongly compelling, well-researched, and balanced rationale. 2. Name change procedures. The NACC process of considering an English name change is the same as for other nomenclatural topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Caye Caulker Forest and Marine Reserve
    Caye Caulker Forest and Marine Reserve- Integrated Management Plan 2004-2009 *** Prepared For Belize Coastal Zone Management Institute/Authority and Belize Fisheries Department By Ellen M McRae, Consultant, CZMA/I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 LIST OF TABLES 8 LIST OF MAPS 9 LIST OF ACRONYMS 10 1. INTRODUCTION 12 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12 1.1.1 Habitat Suitability—Rationale for Area’s Selection 12 1.1.2 History of Caye Caulker’s Protected Areas 14 1.1.3 Current Status 15 1.1.4 Legislative Authority 15 1.1.5 Context 17 1.2 GENERAL INFORMATION 17 1.2.1 Purpose and Scope of Plan 17 1.2.2 Location 18 1.2.3 Access 19 1.2.4 Land Tenure and Seabed Use 19 1.2.5 Graphic Representation 20 1.2.5.1 Mapping 20 1.2.5.2 Aerial Photographic and Satellite Imagery 20 1.2.5.3 Other Remote Imagery 21 2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 21 2.1 GEOLOGY, SUBSTRATE AND BATHYMETRY 21 2.2 HYDROLOGY 22 2.3 TIDES AND CURRENTS 23 2.4 WATER QUALITY 23 2.4.1 Seawater 23 2.4.2 Groundwater and Surface Waters on the Caye 24 2.5 CLIMATE AND WEATHER 25 2.5.1 General Climate Regime 26 2.5.2 Rainfall 26 2.5.3 Extreme Weather Events 26 3 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 29 3.1 EMERGENT SYSTEMS 29 3.1.1 Littoral Forest 29 3.1.1.1 Flora 31 3.1.1.2 Fauna 33 3.1.1.3 Commercially Harvested Species 36 3.1.1.4 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 37 3.1.1.5 Threats to Systems 38 3.1.2 Mangroves 39 3.1.2.1 Flora 40 3.1.2.2 Fauna 40 3.1.2.3 Commercially Harvested Species 42 3.1.2.4 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 43 3.1.2.5 Threats to System 44 3.2 SUBMERGED SYSTEMS 45 3.2.1 Seagrass and Other Lagoon
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT For ARA MACAO Resort & Marina To be located in: Placencia, Stann Creek District Prepared by: Volume 1 January 2006 Table of Contents 1.0 Project Description & Layout Plan 1-1 1.01 Project Location and Description 1-1 1.02 The Physical Development Plans and the Description of the Facilities. 1-2 1.03 Plan Layout 1-5 1.04 Specifications for the Facilities and Forecast of Activities 1-7 1.05 Phases of Project Implementation 1-7 2.0 The Physical Environment 2-1 2.01 Topography 2-1 2.02 Climate 2-5 2.03 Geology 2-6 2.2 Project Facilities 2-10 3.0 Policy and Legal Administrative Framework 3-1 3.1 Policy 3-1 3.2 Legal Framework 3-2 3.3 Administrative Framework 3-4 3.4 The EIA Process 3-6 3.5 Permits and approvals required by the project 3-7 3.6 International And Regional Environmental Agreements 3-8 4.0 Flora and Fauna 4-1 4.1 Introduction 4-1 4.1.1 Mangrove Swamp 4-1 4.1.2 Freshwater Marsh and Swamps 4-1 4.1.3 Transitional Low Broadleaf Forest 4-1 4.2 Flora Survey 4-2 4.3 Avifaunal Survey 4-6 4.3.1 Results of bird census 4-6 4.4 Species of Key Conservation Concern 4-10 4.4.1 Reptiles 4-10 4.4.1.1 Crocodiles (Family Crocodylidae) 4-10 4.4.1.2 Spiny Tailed Iguana 4-11 4.4.1.3 Boa Constrictor 4-11 4.4.1.4 Mammals 4-11 4.5 Estimated Alteration of Vegetation 4-12 4.6 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 4-12 5.0 Water Resource 5-1 5.1 Occupancy Rate 5-1 5.2 Potable Water Demand 5-1 5.3 Water Source 5-3 5.3.1 Preferred Option 5-3 5.4 Water Supply Description 5-5 5.5 Ground and Surface Waters Analysis 5-5 5.5.1 Water Quality
    [Show full text]