DOCSLIB.ORG

Use of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Subsequent Bone Loss In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Subsequent Bone Loss In www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of subsequent bone loss in a nationwide population‑based cohort study Sunyoung Kang1,6, Minkyung Han2,6, Chun Il Park3, Inkyung Jung4, Eun Hwa Kim2, Young Jun Boo1, Jee In Kang1,5* & Se Joo Kim1,5* This study examined whether the use of SRIs is associated with an increased risk of bone loss using a nested case–control design with a nationwide population–based cohort in Korea. Using the Korean National Health Screening Cohort, subjects newly diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia (n = 55,799) were matched with controls (n = 278,995) at a ratio of 1:5. We stratifed the participants by their time‑dependent use of SRIs and sex and controlled for various confounders, including lifestyle habits, laboratory data, and comorbidities. Conditional logistic regression showed that both recent and former users of SRIs had an increased risk of subsequent bone loss compared with non‑users: men [recent users: odds ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% confdential interval (CI) 1.20, 1.53; former‑users: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01, 1.20]; women (recent users: OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28–1.48; former‑users: OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02, 1.21). The use of SRIs was associated with an increased risk of bone loss in both men and women. In particular, the association was stronger in recent users. These fndings provide population‑ level evidence for the risk of bone loss associated with SRI exposure and highlight the importance of monitoring the bone health of SRI users. Te use of antidepressants, especially serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), has become increasingly common in recent decades all around the world1–5. Reports of low bone mineral density (BMD)6–8 and bone fractures9–19 in people taking antidepressants have raised the concern that SRIs could have adverse efects on bone. A meta- analysis of 16 studies reported that users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are 1.61 times more likely to develop bone fractures than non-users (Relative risk 1.61 95% CI 1.49, 1.74)15. In addition, some studies found that the use of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) can be associated with an increased risk of bone fractures16,17. Although those fracture-risk fndings suggest a possible link between use of SRIs and bone health, any real connection between them remains unclear20, and the risk of bone fractures among people taking antidepressants could be related to other factors, such as falls and depressive status. Findings about the adverse efects of SRI use on BMD are limited and mixed. Although several studies reported that a history of taking SSRIs predicted decreased BMD in both men and women 6–8,18, some studies found no signifcant association between them21,22. A meta‐analysis of 4 studies examining the association between antidepressants and BMD in women showed that antidepressant was not associated with lower or higher BMD23. A cohort study (173 men and 323 women) reported that taking antidepressants was associated with low BMD in women (Coefcient -0.141, 95% CI -0.263, -0.020) but not in men (Coefcient 0.073, 95% CI -0.086, 0.232)22. Moreover, current users of antidepressants were reported to show a signifcantly higher risk of osteoporotic fractures than former users 17. Tese inconsistent results across studies might be attributable to small sample sizes, diferent study designs, sample characteristics such as sex diferences, diferent duration of antidepressant use, and sampling bias. More research into the independent efect of SRIs on bone health in a 1Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3Department of Psychiatry, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. 4Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. 6These authors contributed equally: Sunyoung Kang and Minkyung Han. *email: [email protected]; [email protected] Scientifc Reports | (2021) 11:13461 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92821-9 1 Vol.:(0123456789) www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. Flow chart of the study process. large unbiased clinical sample controlled for various confounders is needed to improve the safety of SRI treat- ment and the healthcare quality. In this study, we used a nationwide population-based Korean cohort to examine whether the use of SRIs is associated with subsequent bone loss. We used a nested case–control design with a 1:5 matching ratio of cases to controls and stratifed the participants according to their time-dependent use of SRIs and their sex. In addition, we controlled for various potential confounders such as laboratory test results and lifestyle factors that could afect bone health. Results We identifed 388,979 individuals who had received a medical check-up between Jan 2004 and Dec 2006. We excluded participants with a previous diagnosis related to bone loss (n = 51,151) or exposure to SRIs during the wash out period (n = 35,508). Using a 1:5 matching ratio of cases to controls, controls without any diag- nosis related to bone loss (n = 278,995) were randomly selected for each case in the group with low bone mass [n = 55,799; 43,313 Women (77.6%); mean (SD) age, 58.0 (9.4) years]. A detailed fow chart is provided in Fig. 1. Te baseline characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table 1. Te rate of participants who never used SRIs was lower in subjects with a new diagnosis of low bone density than in those without such a diagnosis. At the same time, subjects in the case group were more likely to be classifed as former or recent users of SRIs than those in the control group. In both sexes, subjects in the case group were more likely than the controls to take glucocorticoids, GnRH agonists, anticonvulsants, thiazolidinediones, antipsychotics, benzodiazepine, and TCA. Men and women who were newly diagnosed with low bone density had a higher prevalence than controls of using androgen deprivation therapy and aromatase inhibitors, respectively. Subjects with low bone density were more likely to take DMPA and estrogen or a combination of estrogen and progesterone, but those outcomes occurred only in women. Te low bone density group was also more likely than the controls to report high CCI, low systolic and diastolic blood pressures, low fasting blood glucose level, and low total cholesterol level; and perform little exercise. Te case group presented with lower hemoglobin levels and higher AST than the controls, but this outcome occurred only in men. Participants with osteoporosis had lower urine protein and ALT levels, and those results were driven by women. Scientifc Reports | (2021) 11:13461 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92821-9 2 Vol:.(1234567890) www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Total Men Women Low bone density Normal Low bone density Normal Low bone density Normal Characteristic (n = 55,799)a (n = 278,995)a P-value (n = 12,486) (n = 62,430) P-value (n = 43,313) (n = 216,565) P-value Age, mean ± SD 58.0 ± 9.4 58.0 ± 9.4 61.0 ± 9.6 61.0 ± 9.6 57.1 ± 9.1 57.1 ± 9.1 Serotonin reuptake inhibitors < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 use Never used, no. (%) 51,186 (91.7) 263,413 (94.4) 11,296 (90.5) 58,777 (94.2) 39,890 (92.1) 204,636 (94.5) Former user, no. (%) 3151 (5.7) 11,358 (4.1) 755 (6.0) 2574 (4.1) 2396 (5.5) 8784 (4.1) Recent user, no. (%) 1462 (2.6) 4224 (1.5) 435 (3.5) 1079 (1.7) 1027 (2.4) 3145 (1.4) Medicationd Glucocorticoids, no. (%) 46,024 (82.5) 203,843 (73.1) < 0.001 10,610 (85.0) 47,318 (75.8) < 0.001 35,414 (81.8) 156,525 (72.3) < 0.001 Aromatase inhibitors, no. (%)b 225 (0.4) 199 (0.1) < 0.001 225 (0.5) 199 (0.1) < 0.001 Androgen deprivation therapy, 126 (0.2) 278 (0.1) < 0.001 126 (1.0) 278 (0.5) < 0.001 no. (%)b GnRH agonists, no. (%) 201 (0.4) 402 (0.1) < 0.001 134 (1.1) 266 (0.4) < 0.001 67 (0.2) 136 (0.1) < 0.001 Anticonvulsants, no. (%) 3819 (6.8) 13,355 (4.8) < 0.001 1129 (9.0) 3540 (5.7) < 0.001 2690 (6.2) 9815 (4.5) < 0.001 Tiazolidinediones, no. (%) 1072 (1.9) 4625 (1.7) < 0.001 386 (3.1) 1638 (2.6) 0.004 686 (1.6) 2987 (1.4) 0.001 DMPA, no. (%)c 794 (1.4) 2739 (1.0) < 0.001 1 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.167 793 (1.8) 2739 (1.3) < 0.001 Antipsychotics, no. (%) 2184 (3.9) 8231 (3.0) < 0.001 671 (5.4) 2089 (3.4) < 0.001 1513 (3.5) 6142 (2.8) < 0.001 Benzodiazepine, no. (%) 43,877 (78.6) 186,829 (67.0) < 0.001 9888 (79.2) 41,627 (66.7) < 0.001 33,989 (78.5) 145,202 (67.1) < 0.001 TCA c, no. (%) 10,855 (19.5) 35,226 (12.6) < 0.001 2658 (21.3) 8128 (13.0) < 0.001 8197 (18.9) 27,098 (12.5) < 0.001 Estrogen or estrogen + proges- 6175 (11.1) 18,678 (6.7) < 0.001 5 (0.0) 27 (0.0) 1 6170 (14.3) 18,651 (8.6) < 0.001 terone combination, no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Efficacy and Safety of Elcatonin in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: a Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Osteoporosis International (2019) 30:1723–1732 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-04997-6 REVIEW Efficacy and safety of elcatonin in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials W.-C. Chen1,2 & E.-Y. Lin3 & Y.-N. Kang1,4 Received: 20 November 2018 /Accepted: 21 April 2019 /Published online: 1 May 2019 # International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019 Abstract Summary The present systematic review aimed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) change and complication rates of elcatonin on treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. The result confirmed efficacy of elcatonin and safety in combination thera- pies of elcatonin (C-E). Introduction Postmenopausal osteoporosis is an important issue in global aging trends. One treatment of osteoporosis is elcatonin, a kind of calcitonin. However, it has been challenged for long time because of safety. Many trials investigated on this topic, but they were designed differently. Those designs can be categorized in monotherapy of elcatonin (M-E) and C-E. Unfortunately, no synthesized evidence dealt this topic. Methods This study systematically identified target trials from six important databases and only included randomized controlled trial for synthesis. Two investigators assessed quality of eligible trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and they indepen- dently extracted data. Network meta-analysis performed Peto odds ratio (POR, used for dealing with zero cell) or weighted mean difference (WMD, for continuous data) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and consistency H. Results Sixteen trials recruiting 2754 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were included in our study. Elcatonin therapies and non-elcatonin medications had comparable fracture rates and bone mineral density change.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Advances in Therapeutic Peptides Targeting G Protein-Coupled
    Advances in therapeutic peptides targeting G protein-coupled receptors Anthony P. Davenport1Ϯ Conor C.G. Scully2Ϯ, Chris de Graaf2, Alastair J. H. Brown2 and Janet J. Maguire1 1Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 2Sosei Heptares, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6DG, UK. Ϯ Contributed equally Correspondence to Anthony P. Davenport email: [email protected] Abstract Dysregulation of peptide-activated pathways causes a range of diseases, fostering the discovery and clinical development of peptide drugs. Many endogenous peptides activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) — nearly fifty GPCR peptide drugs have been approved to date, most of them for metabolic disease or oncology, and more than 10 potentially first- in-class peptide therapeutics are in the pipeline. The majority of existing peptide therapeutics are agonists, which reflects the currently dominant strategy of modifying the endogenous peptide sequence of ligands for peptide-binding GPCRs. Increasingly, novel strategies are being employed to develop both agonists and antagonists, and both to introduce chemical novelty and improve drug-like properties. Pharmacodynamic improvements are evolving to bias ligands to activate specific downstream signalling pathways in order to optimise efficacy and reduce side effects. In pharmacokinetics, modifications that increase plasma-half life have been revolutionary. Here, we discuss the current status of peptide drugs targeting GPCRs, with a focus on evolving strategies to improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Introduction G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate a wide range of signalling processes and are targeted by one third of drugs in clinical use1. Although most GPCR-targeting therapeutics are small molecules2, the endogenous ligands for many GPCRs are peptides (comprising 50 or fewer amino acids), which suggests that this class of molecule could be therapeutically useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2008) (Rev
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2008) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2008) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM GADOCOLETICUM 280776-87-6 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACAMPROSATE
    [Show full text]
  • Elcatonin (Rinn) Sensitivity Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis, Have Pression of the Airway Or Vulnerable Neurological Structures
    Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/Calcitonins 1093 ports of swelling of neck and throat tissue, with resultant com- Elcatonin (rINN) sensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, have pression of the airway or vulnerable neurological structures. [Aminosuberic Acid 1,7]-eel Calcitonin; [Asu1,7]-E-CT; Carbocal- occurred. Complications were often life-threatening, and had required res- piratory support and/or tracheotomy in some cases. The use of citonin; Elcatonina; Elcatonine; Elcatoninum. 1-Butyric acid-7-(L- Calcitonin has inhibited lactation in animals. alternative treatments or enrollment in approved clinical studies 2-aminobutyric acid)-26-L-aspartic acid-27-L-valine-29-L-alanine- Nausea and vomiting may be reduced by giving doses 1 calcitonin (salmon). was recommended when treating cervical spine problems. at bedtime or by giving an antiemetic beforehand. 1. FDA. FDA Public Health Notification: Life-threatening compli- Элькатонин cations associated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic Calcitonin (pork) may contain trace amounts of thyroid C148H244N42O47 = 3363.8. protein in cervical spine fusion. Available at: http:// CAS — 60731-46-6. hormones, but clinical effects are unlikely in most pa- www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/070108-rhbmp.html (accessed 17/07/08) ATC — H05BA04. tients. ATC Vet — QH05BA04. Preparations Antibody formation. Long-term treatment with heterologous Description. Elcatonin is a synthetic analogue of eel calcitonin. calcitonins may lead to the formation of neutralising antibodies. Proprietary Preparations (details are given in Part 3) Pharmacopoeias. In Jpn. This appears to be common in patients given calcitonin (pork) or, Belg.: InductOs; Cz.: InductOs; Osigraft; Denm.: InductOs; Osigraft; Fin.: to a lesser extent, calcitonin (salmon). Calcitonin (human) is less InductOs; Gr.: InductOs; Osigraft; Irl.: InductOs; Ital.: Osigraft; Neth.: Os- 1 igraft; Norw.: InductOs; Port.: Osigraft; Spain: InductOs; Osigraft; Swed.: Incompatibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Raloxifene Or Calcitonin
    Appendices Table of Contents Appendix A. Search Strategy ................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B. Risk of Bias Assessment Decision Aid .............................................................. B-1 Appendix C. Included References Risk of Bias Assessment ................................................. C-1 Appendix D. Evidence Tables .................................................................................................. D-1 Table D1. Characteristics of observational studies with low or medium risk of bias ............ D-1 Table D2. Characteristics of RCTs and CCTs with low or medium risk of bias .................... D-6 Table D3. Key Questions 1 & 2 Evidence Overview ........................................................... D-15 Table D4. Key Questions 3 & 4 Evidence Overview ........................................................... D-28 Table D5. Key Questions 5 & 6 Evidence Overview ........................................................... D-45 Table D6. Key Questions 7 & 8 Evidence Overview ........................................................... D-50 Table D7. Characteristics of eligible studies with high risk of bias ..................................... D-52 Strength of Evidence Tables ..................................................................................................... 57 Alendronate ....................................................................................................................... D-57 Table D8.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty As Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
    ISSN 1889-836X Volume 2 Number 2 July 2010 Revista de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral EDITORIALS Bone Pathology of Gaucher's Disease 5 López-Herce Cid JA The paradox of vitamin D deficiency in sunny regions, in young people, or in osteoporotic 7 patients treated with vitamin D, could be explained by common genetic variation. Have we found the Rosetta Stone to this apparent contradiction? Quesada Gómez JM ORIGINAL ARTICLES Factors related to vitamin D deficiency in medical students in Gran Canaria 11 Groba Marco MV, Mirallave Pescador A, González Rodríguez E, García Santana S, González Padilla E, Saavedra Santana P et al Effect of zoledronic acid on the markers for bone remodelling in Paget’s disease 21 Díaz Curiel M, Serrano Morales R, De la Piedra Gordo C, Moro Álvarez MJ, Andrade Poveda M Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as a treatment for osteoporotic fractures 27 Pérez-Núñez MI, Riancho Moral JA REVIEWS Importance of the type of formulation of the preparations of calcium and vitamin D in the prevention 35 and treatment of osteoporosis García Quetglas E, Urdaneta Abate M, Sádaba Díaz de Rada B, Landecho Acha M, Lucena Ramírez F, Azanza Perea JR Cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis 47 Reyes García R, Rozas Moreno P, Muñoz Torres M Determining the principal metabolites of vitamin D in the blood through on-line solid phase 55 extraction with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in tandem Mata-Granados JM, Ferreiro-Verab C, Luque de Castro MD, Quesada Gómez JM SPECIAL DOCUMENTS Current perspectives on the role of
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Study of Teriparatide on Ovariectomy-Induced Hyperalgesia in Rats
    Title Pharmacological study of teriparatide on ovariectomy-induced hyperalgesia in rats Author(s) 田中, 智哉 Citation 北海道大学. 博士(歯学) 甲第13876号 Issue Date 2020-03-25 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k13876 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/78480 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Tomoya_Tanaka.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP 博 士 論 文 Pharmacological study of teriparatide on ovariectomy-induced hyperalgesia in rats （卵巣摘除ラットモデルを用いた骨粗鬆性痛覚過 敏に対するテリパラチドの薬理作用の解明） 令和 2 年 3 月申請 北海道大学 大学院歯学研究科口腔医学専攻 田 中 智 哉 目次 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 Materials and methods ................................................................................................ 4 Experimental animals ....................................................................................................................4 Experimental design ......................................................................................................................4 Pain-related behavioral test ...........................................................................................................5 Plantar test ................................................................................................................................. 5 von Frey test ..............................................................................................................................6 Skeletal analyses ...........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement Ii to the Japanese Pharmacopoeia Seventeenth Edition
    SUPPLEMENT II TO THE JAPANESE PHARMACOPOEIA SEVENTEENTH EDITION O‹cial from June 28, 2019 English Version THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH, LABOUR AND WELFARE Notice: This English Version of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia is published for the convenience of users unfamiliar with the Japanese language. When and if any discrepancy arises between the Japanese original and its English translation, the former is authentic. Printed in Japan The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 49 Pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 41 of Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (Act No. 145, 1960), this notification stated that a part of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia was revised as follows*. NEMOTO Takumi The Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare June 28, 2019 A part of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (Ministerial Notification No. 64, 2016) was revised as follows*. (The text referred to by the term ``as follows'' are omitted here. All of the revised Japanese Pharmacopoeia in accordance with this notification (hereinafter referred to as ``new Pharmacopoeia'' in Supplement 2) are made available for public exhibition at the Pharmaceutical Evaluation Division, Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmen- tal Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, at each Regional Bureau of Health and Welfare, and at each Prefectural Office in Japan). Supplementary Provisions (Effective Date) Article 1 This Notification is applied from June 28, 2019. (Transitional measures) Article 2 In the case of drugs which are listed in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (hereinafter referred to as ``previous Pharmacopoeia'') [limited to those listed in new Pharmacopoeia] and drugs which have been approved as of June 28, 2019 as prescribed under Paragraph 1, Article 14 of Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices [including drugs the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare specifies (the Ministry of Health and Welfare Ministerial Notification No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals Appendix
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • Orphan Drug Designation List
    Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals List as of 06‐01‐2016 Governs July 1, 2016 ‐ September 30, 2016 Row Contact Generic Name Trade Name Designation Date Designation Num Company/Sponsor 1 (-)-(3aR,4S,7aR)-4-Hydroxy-4- m-tolylethynyl-octahydro- Novartis indole-1-carboxylic acid Pharmaceuticals methyl ester n/a 10/12/2011 Treatment of Fragile X syndrome Corp. 2 (1-methyl-2-nitro-1H- imidazole-5-yl)methyl N,N'- bis(2-broethyl) diamidophosphate n/a 6/5/2013 Treatment of pancreatic cancer EMD Serono 3 (1-methyl-2-nitro-1H- imidazole-5-yl)methyl N,N'- bis(2-bromoethyl) Threshold diamidophosphate n/a 3/9/2012 Treatment of soft tissue sarcoma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 4 (1OR)-7-amino-12-fluoro- 2,10,16-trimethyl-15 oxo- 10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4- Treatment of anaplastic (metheno)pyrazolo[4,3- lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive h][2,5,11]benzoxadiazacyclote or ROS1-positive non-small cell tradecine-3-carbonitrile n/a 6/23/2015 lung cancer Pfizer, Inc. 5 (1R,3R,4R,5S)-3-O-[2-O- Treatment of vaso-occlusive benzoyl-3-O-(sodium(2S)-3- crisis in patients with sickle cell cyclohexyl-propanoate- n/a 2/17/2009 disease. Pfizer, Inc. 6 (1S)-1-(9-deazahypoxanthin-9- yl)-1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D- Treatment of T-cell non- Mundipharma ribitol-hydrochloride n/a 1/29/2004 Hodgkin's lymphoma Research Limited 7 (1S)-1-(9-deazahypoxanthin-9- yl)-1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D- Treatment of acute Mundipharma ribitol-hydrochloride n/a 8/13/2004 lymphoblastic leukemia Research Limited Page 1 of 364 Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals List as of 06‐01‐2016 Governs July 1, 2016 ‐ September 30, 2016 Row Contact Generic Name Trade Name Designation Date Designation Num Company/Sponsor 8 Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related leukemias to include (1S)-1-(9-deazahypoxanthin-9- prolymphocytic leukemia, adult T- yl)-1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D- cell leukemia, and hairy cell Mundipharma ribitol-hydrochloride n/a 8/10/2004 leukemia Research Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Product List
    PRODUCT LIST Active Pharma Ingredients API Acid Reflux Disorders Product Pharmacopoeia CAS No. Technical Document A Acotiamide Hydrochloride - 773092-05-0 - Almagate EP 66827-12-1 - Aluminum Hydroxide BP, USP 21645-51-2 - C Cimetidine - 51481-61-9 - D Dexlansoprazole - 138530-94-6 - Dexlansoprazole - 313640-86-7 DMF Sesquihydrate Dexrabeprazole Sodium - 171440-18-9 ODMF, Tech Pack E Ecabet Sodium - 86408-72-2 DMF Esomeprazole - 119141-88-7 - Esomeprazole Magneisum - 217087-10-0 - Dihydrate Esomeprazole Magnesium - 161973-10-0 - Esomeprazole Magnesium USP 217087-09-7 CEP, DMF Trihydrate Esomeprazole Potassium IHS 161796-84-5 DMF Esomeprazole Sodium - 161796-78-7 - Esomeprazole Zinc/ 793668-08-3, - - Base/Strontium 119141-88-7 F Famotidine - 76824-35-6 - E Glycopyrrolate - 596-51-0 - H Hydrotelcite BP 12304-65-3 - I Ilaprazole IHS, IP 172152-36-2 DMF Ilaprazole Sodium - 172152-50-0 ODMF, Tech Pack Itopride - 122898-67-3 - Itopride Hydrochloride IHS 122892-31-3 - Patent Disclaimer: Products protected by valid patents are not offered for sale in countries, where the sale of such products constitutes a patent infringement. The buyers should make their independent evaluation of the patent scenario for their respective markets and will be responsible for all patent related liabilities. 2021-01-11 © ExSyn Corp | All rights reserved. | www.exsyncorp.com 1 API Acid Reflux Disorders Product Pharmacopoeia CAS No. Technical Document L Lafutidine - 118288-08-7 - Lansoprazole - 103577-45-3 - Lansoprazole Sodium - 226904-00-3 - M Magaldrate USP 74978-16-8
    [Show full text]