Lancaster City Council Standards Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lancaster City Council Standards Committee Additional Notes on Completing the Councillor Complaint Form Are you using the correct form? The points listed below will help you decide whether this is the correct for to use when making your complaint. You should speak to the Governance Services Office (01642 444092) if you are not clear whether your complaint will be considered. - Your complaint must be about conduct that occurred while the member(s) complained about were in office. Conduct of an individual before they were elected, co-opted or appointed to the authority, or after they have resigned or otherwise ceased to be a member, cannot be considered. - Your complaint must be about one or more named members of the following authorities: o Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council o Guisborough Town Council o Lockwood Parish Council o Loftus Town Council o Saltburn, Marske and New Marske Parish Council o Skelton and Brotton Parish Council - Your complaint must be that the member(s) has, or may have, breached the Code of Conduct. You can contact the Governance Services Office if you requires any further information on 01642 444092. Complaints about dissatisfaction with a decision or action of the authority of one of its committees, a service provided by the authority or the authority’s procedures do not fall within the jurisdiction of the Standards Committee which has overall responsibility for matters relating to the Code of Conduct. Complaints about the actions of people employed by the authority also do not fall within the jurisdiction of the Standards Committee. There is a separate Corporate Complaints process and form for making such complaints at: www.redcar- cleveland.gov.uk/main.nsf/Web+Full+List/EA933A45C0016DCB80256BA00049 DF2A?OpenDocument - Your complaint must be in writing. If a disability prevents you from making your complaint in writing you may contact the Governance Services Office (01642 444092) for assistance. - The Monitoring Officer will assess if the complaint is capable of amounting to a matter that should be referred to the Assessment Sub Committee. - It is important to note that not every complaint that falls within the jurisdiction of the Standards Committee will be referred for investigation or other action. The Assessment Sub Committee of the Standards Committee will decide what is the appropriate action to take. It will make this decision based on whether the Councillor’s actions include any of the following: o Bullying o Disclosing confidential information Updated July 2013 1 o Accepting inappropriate gifts and hospitality – or failing to declare gifts and hospitality o Disreputable conduct o Misuse of Council facilities or resources o Failure to declare a pecuniary or other interest If either the Monitoring Officer or the Assessment Sub Committee decide that your complaint should not be progressed or if the Assessment Sub Committee decides not to refer your complaint for investigation or other action, you will be given the reasons for this decision. What happens once you submit your complaint? The Monitoring Officer will review the complaint and must be satisfied that:- 1. The complaint is against one or more named Members or co-opted Members of the Council or a Town or Parish Council within the Borough of Redcar and Cleveland. 2. The Subject Member was in office at the time of the alleged conduct and the Code of Conduct was in force at the time. 3. The complaint, if proven, would be a breach of the Code of Conduct under which the Subject Member was operating at the time of the alleged misconduct. If the complaint fails one or more of the above requirements it cannot be investigated as a breach of the code and the complainant will be informed that no further action will be taken in respect of the complaint. The Monitoring Officer will acknowledge receipt of the accepted complaint within 5 working days of receiving it and, at the same time, write to the Subject Member (and in the case of a complaint about a Parish Councillor to the Clerk of the Parish Council as well) with details of the allegations (subject to any representations from the Complainant on confidentiality, which are accepted as valid by the Monitoring Officer). The Subject Member may, within 5 working days of receipt, make written representations to the Assessment Sub Committee which must be taken into account when deciding how the complaint will be dealt with. Representations received after this time but before the Assessment Sub Committee has decided how the complaint will be dealt with may be taken into account at the discretion of the Chair. The Monitoring Officer will produce a short factual summary for the Assessment Sub Committee which sets out: o Whether the complaint is within the authority’s jurisdiction. o The paragraphs of the Code of Conduct the complaint might relate to. o A summary of the key aspects of the complaint if it is lengthy or complex. o Any further information obtained which may assist the assessment sub- committee with its decision (for example, a copy of a declaration of acceptance of office form, minutes of meetings, a copy of a member’s entry Updated July 2013 2 in the register of interests, information from Companies House or the Land Registry, the Subject Member’s response). Officers may contact Complainants to seek clarification of the complaint if necessary. The Assessment Sub Committee meeting is a private meeting and should be held where possible within 30 working days from receipt of the complaint. The Assessment Sub Committee can make 3 assessment decisions: 1) Not to refer for investigation - No Action 2) Refer for Investigation - Investigation 3) Refer to the Monitoring Officer - Other Action “Refer for Investigation” can include a Fast Track route to a Hearings Panel in circumstances for example where the Subject Member immediately accepts in their written representation to the Assessment Sub Committee that there has been a breach of the Code and a detailed investigation is not considered necessary. The Council will inform the Complainant, the Subject Member (and the Clerk of the Parish Council, where the complaint relates to a Parish Councillor), of the Assessment Sub Committee decision within 5 working days. What is meant by ‘other action’? The Assessment Sub Committee may decide to refer your complaint for ‘other action’ instead of referring it for investigation. Other action is a deliberately broad term that may include options such as requiring the person you have complained about to apologise or undergo training or mediation. The Assessment Sub Committee will carefully consider the circumstances surrounding your complaint when deciding whether other action is appropriate. If the Assessment Sub Committee decides to refer your complaint for other action we will explain what this involves. How should I set out my complaint? It is very important that you set your complaint out fully and clearly, and provide all the information at the outset. You should also provide any documents or other material that you wish the Monitoring Officer or the Assessment Sub Committee to consider, where possible. Unless the authority advises you otherwise, you will not be able to attend the meeting of the Assessment Sub Committee. We recommend that you use our complaint form or provide a covering note summarising what you are complaining about, especially if your complaint includes a lot of supporting documentation. In the summary you should tell us exactly what each person you are complaining about said or did that has caused Updated July 2013 3 you to complain. If you are sending supporting documentation please cross- reference it against the summary of your complaint. You should be as detailed as possible and substantiate your complaint where you can. Although you are not required to prove your complaint at this stage of the proceedings, you do have to demonstrate that you have reasonable grounds for believing that the member(s) complained about has breached the Code of Conduct. Updated July 2013 4.
Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The development of education in the North Ridings of Yorkshire 1902 - 1939 Jennings, E. How to cite: Jennings, E. (1965) The development of education in the North Ridings of Yorkshire 1902 - 1939, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9965/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Abstract of M. Ed. thesis submitted by B. Jennings entitled "The Development of Education in the North Riding of Yorkshire 1902 - 1939" The aim of this work is to describe the growth of the educational system in a local authority area. The education acts, regulations of the Board and the educational theories of the period are detailed together with their effect on the national system. Local conditions of geograpliy and industry are also described in so far as they affected education in the North Riding of Yorkshire and resulted in the creation of an educational system characteristic of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • X3A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    X3A bus time schedule & line map X3A Brotton - Middlesbrough View In Website Mode The X3A bus line (Brotton - Middlesbrough) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Brotton: 8:46 AM - 3:50 PM (2) Dormanstown: 5:15 PM (3) Middlesbrough: 7:17 AM - 4:15 PM (4) North Skelton: 3:19 PM - 5:55 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest X3A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next X3A bus arriving. Direction: Brotton X3A bus Time Schedule 51 stops Brotton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 8:46 AM - 3:50 PM Bus Station Stand 4, Middlesbrough Newport Road, Middlesbrough Tuesday 8:46 AM - 3:50 PM International East Gate, Dormanstown Wednesday 8:46 AM - 3:50 PM Broadway West, Dormanstown Thursday 8:46 AM - 3:50 PM Friday 8:46 AM - 3:50 PM Ennis Square, Dormanstown Saturday 8:07 AM - 3:50 PM Abercrombie Road, Dormanstown Charlton Road, England Gordon Road, Dormanstown X3A bus Info Derwent Road, Redcar Direction: Brotton 8 Kirkleatham Lane, Redcar Stops: 51 Trip Duration: 85 min Coatham Roundabout, Coatham Line Summary: Bus Station Stand 4, Middlesbrough, International East Gate, Dormanstown, Broadway The Lobster, Coatham West, Dormanstown, Ennis Square, Dormanstown, Abercrombie Road, Dormanstown, Gordon Road, The Coatham Surgery, Coatham Dormanstown, Derwent Road, Redcar, Coatham Roundabout, Coatham, The Lobster, Coatham, The Coatham Road, Redcar Coatham Surgery, Coatham, Town Clock, Redcar, Town Clock, Redcar Moore Street, Redcar, The Plimsoll Line, Redcar, Park Avenue, Redcar, Aske
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Future Gypsy/Traveller Sites Initial Assessment Report March 2016
    Independent Examination of the Redcar and Cleveland Local Plan Potential Future Gypsy/Traveller Sites Initial Assessment Report March 2016 this is Redcar & Cleveland Potential Future Gypsy/Traveller Sites – Initial Assessment Report March 2016 A Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA), completed in 2016, determined a need for the local authority to provide a further 8 pitches by 2030. The formula used to calculate this need was applied for a further two years to ensure it covered the Local Plan period. This determined a need for the local authority to provide a further 9 pitches up to 2032. In preparation, the Council explored the feasibility of additional site provision on all council‐owned land within the borough. Initially highlighted through the Council’s GIS mapping system, 30 areas land were shortlisted which could potentially accommodate an additional site. In accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS), consideration of proximity to businesses, existing residential communities, services and facilities, alongside potential environment impact, loss of open space and evidence of traveller movements in the area were made and site visits were carried out to determine any other factors such as access. The findings of this assessment were compiled into this report and presented to Council Members in March 2016 where it was concluded that the most effective and sustainable option would be to extend the existing Haven Traveller site. An extension to the site would have good public transport links and access to services but would also contribute to the existing community. In addition, the evidence within the GTAA described the identified needs predominantly arising from household growth from within The Haven; this option would also allow these families to remain on the site.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 14Ra NOVEMBER 1958 6985
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 14ra NOVEMBER 1958 6985 NORTH RIDING COUNTY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that the North Riding of Yorkshire County Council in exercise of the powers conferred on them by section 29(3) of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, have determined to modify the particulars contained in the draft rights of way map and a statement prepared under section 27 of the above mentioned Act in relation to rights of way within the Parishes named in the second column of the Schedule hereto. Lists and maps showing the proposed modifications have been deposited at the places set out in the first column of the Schedule and may be inspected there free of'charge at all reasonable hours. Any representation or objection with respect to this determination must be made in writing to the Clerk of the County Council, County Hall, Northallerton, Yorkshire, before the 16th day of December 1958; the grounds of objection must be stated. ..•-•> Dated this 14th day of November 1958. Hubert Thornley, Clerk of the County Council. SCHEDULE Place of Deposit Parishes to which extract relates Rural District Council Offices, Eskholme, Aislaby, Barnby, Borrowby, Egton, Ellerby, Eskdaleside-cum- Whitby. Ugglebarnby, Fylingdales, Fylingdales Moor, Glaisdale, Goath- land, Hawsker-cum-Stainsacre, Hinderwell, Lythe, Mickleby, Newholm-cum-Dunsley, Newton Mulgrave, Roxby and Sneaton in the Whitby Rural District. Police House, High Street, Castleton Commondale, Danby and Westerdale in the Whitby Rural District. Urban District Council Offices, St. Hilda's Whitby Urban District. Terrace, Whitby. Municipal Buildings, Redcar Borough of Redcar. Council Offices, Grangetown-on-Tees Estpn Urban District.
    [Show full text]
  • X4A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    X4A bus time schedule & line map X4A Middlesbrough - Whitby View In Website Mode The X4A bus line (Middlesbrough - Whitby) has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Dormanstown: 9:43 PM - 10:43 PM (2) Easington: 9:40 PM - 10:40 PM (3) Middlesbrough: 5:34 PM - 8:43 PM (4) Saltburn: 7:40 PM - 10:40 PM (5) Whitby: 6:40 PM - 8:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest X4A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next X4A bus arriving.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue No. 23 April 1999
    ISSUE NO. 23 APRIL 1999 e~-~m A NEWSPAPER FOR NORTH SKELTON & LAYLAND \ \ Wartime Fireman Recognized I The photo (left) of an unknown \ Thank you all for the lovely Christmas cards, fireman, which appeared in the letters and donations you sent to me. Don and Christmas edition of 'The Key' I are very grateful. I have never had so many is of my late father, Edward phone calls and comments about the front page as I did Stanley Watts (right). He was a with regard to the Christmas edition. Thanks to 'Pip' L;;;.;.==;;';;;;;';'= fireman and 'dispatch rider' for Harrison, who painted the 'Robill, scene, all the feedback Skelton Fire Brigade during the war after returning from was complimentary. Another of 'Pip's lovely paintings is South Africa. He lived at 1 Carricks Yard, Skelton. 011 the front cover ofthis issue. Tony Watts, 9 William Street, North Skelton We flOW have two distribution points ill Skelton - the Co-Op (thank you Mrs Iackson) and Devany's newsagency (thank you to them also). 'The Key' remains at 30p per copy for Who Is This Mystery Lady? non-residents of North Skelton & Leyland. It is unfortunate that there are still people taking 2 or 3 copies Following the above story we have and only dropping 50p ill the Co-Op box 011 their counter. another mystery we would like you If you are Ilot prepared to pay 30p thell please do Ilot take the magazille. To the many ofyou who donate more than to help us solve. 30p thank you vel}'much. Devany's willalso have a box 011 the counterfor any donations you wish to give.
    [Show full text]
  • THE YORK POTASH HARBOUR FACILITIES ORDER 201X Consultation Report – Main Text
    THE YORK POTASH HARBOUR FACILITIES ORDER 201X Consultation Report – Main Text Regulation Number: Section 37(3)(c) Planning Act 2008 Document Ref: 6.1 Author: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners Date: December 2014 Status: Submission Harbour Facilities Development Consent Order Consultation Report Section 37(3)(c) Planning Act 2008 Doc. No: 6.1 York Potash Limited 19 December 2014 50303/HS/Con/Main Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL nlpplanning.com This document is formatted for double sided printing. © Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 2014. Trading as Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners. All Rights Reserved. Registered Office: 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL All plans within this document produced by NLP are based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A Executive Summary The Consultation Report provides an account of the consultation activities undertaken in respect of the proposals for new harbour facilities located at Bran Sands, Teesside. It accompanies an application for a Development Consent Order (‘DCO’), and is prepared on behalf of the applicant, York Potash Limited (‘YPL’). The harbour facilities are required by YPL to enable the export of polyhalite bulk fertiliser, which will be extracted from a proposed mine to be located south of Whitby. The Consultation Report describes engagement undertaken by YPL in respect of the wider project as well as specific consultation on the harbour facilities. The information presented explains how views expressed during the engagement and consultation has been considered by YPL in developing the final form of the DCO application.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Area Parish Forum
    Coastal Area Parish Forum Notes of the Meeting held at Hawsker and Stainsacre Village Hall Thursday, 24 October 2019 Present: Newby and Scalby PC Richard Thompson Skelton and Brotton PC Margaret Whitehead, Brendon Whitehead Fylingdales Les Atkinson, Dick Hoyle Cloughton PC Duncan Baker Ellerby PC Bill Taylor Loftus Town Council Mike Barnes, Mike Hodgson Scarborough Ramblers Assn Margaret Atkinson Members of the Public Ray Clifford (Fylingdales); N Fowler (Harbour Master, Staithes) Forestry England Alan Eves National Park Members Bob Marley, Colin Williamson, Clive Pearson, Subash Sharma National Park Staff Michael Graham (Director of Park Services, Convenor), Bernie McLinden (Senior Ranger Coast Area), Judith Seaton (PA to Chief Executive); Becca Simpson and Lucy Webster (apprentices) 1. Welcome – the Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. 2. Apologies - Andy Wilson, Briony Fox, Jim Bailey (NYMNPA); Jane Mortimer (Scarborough BC/Fylingdales PC) Hinderwell PC; John Cummins (Hawsker PC); Nigel Rylance (Forestry England); Simon Darrington (Staintondale/Ravenscar PC) 3. Notes of the Meeting Held on 11 April 2019 were agreed. 4. Matters Arising - Concern over pollution from Boulby mine, Chris France (Director of Planning) is in contact with Boulby over this. 5. Public Question Time Ray Clifford enquired as to why steps had been removed from the very steep footpath at Stoupe Beck. Bernie McLinden explained that the steps needed to be removed and had been replaced with a stone surface and handrail. The stone surface is being kept under review and flattened down periodically to make it easier to grip but the handrail should assist particularly going downhill. 6. The Apprentice – You're Hired Becca Simpson and Lucy Webster (Business Administration Apprentices) gave an illustrated talk on the role and work of the variety of apprentices at the National Park Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2020, North East and Yorkshire
    North East & Yorkshire Register 2020 HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 130 Content and criteria III York (UA) 132 Key statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 26 Tees Valley 32 Darlington (UA) 32 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 45 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 60 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 61 Harrogate 64 North York Moors (NP) 67 Richmondshire 74 Ryedale 77 Scarborough 89 Selby 91 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 95 South Yorkshire 98 Barnsley 98 Doncaster 100 Peak District (NP) 104 Rotherham 105 Sheffield 107 West Yorkshire 111 Bradford 111 Calderdale 115 Kirklees 120 Leeds 124 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cleveland Naturalists' Report on the Flora of the Coast
    A CLEVELAND NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB BULLETIN 1994 THE CLEVELAND COAST FLORA AND HISTORY 1INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1 1.1DETAILS OF THE SURVEY........................................................................ 2 2THE RIVER TEES AND THE SOUTH GARE.................................................... 3 3THE FLORA OF THE COAST............................................................................ 8 3.1SOUTH GARE ............................................................................................ 8 3.2COATHAM DUNES................................................................................... 13 3.3COATHAM AND REDCAR ....................................................................... 14 3.4REDCAR STRAY....................................................................................... 16 3.4.1THE FLORA OF THE STRAY ............................................................ 17 3.5MARSKE.................................................................................................... 18 3.5.1THE FLORA OF THE COAST BETWEEN MARSKE AND SALTBURN. 19 3.6CAT NAB................................................................................................... 21 3.6.1THE FLORA OF CAT NAB................................................................. 21 3.7SALTBURN................................................................................................ 22 3.8SALTBURN TO SKINNINGROVE............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Adopted May 2018
    Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan Adopted May 2018 this is Redcar & Cleveland Foreword 3 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 SUSTAINABILITY AND DESIGN 33 3 LOCAL SPATIAL STRATEGIES 57 4 REGENERATION 71 5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 85 6 HOUSING 113 7 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 181 8 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 201 9 TRANSPORT AND ACCESSIBILITY 211 Appendices 1 Implementation Plan and Monitoring Framework 226 2 Glossary 251 3 Proposed Site Allocations 269 4 Housing Delivery Schedule 285 5 Relevant Legislation, Policies and other Planning Documents 289 6 Policies to be Deleted 295 7 Key Diagram 299 Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan Redcar & Cleveland 2018 May 1 Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan Redcar & Cleveland 2018 May 2 Foreword Introduction to the Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan The Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan sets out the vision and overall development strategy for the Council’s area and how it will be achieved for the period until 2032. It is the most important planning document in the borough and is the result of a long process of preparation that has involved all parts of the Council. Redcar and Cleveland is a borough of many contrasts with a scenic coastline and attractive countryside bordering the North York Moors National Park, sitting alongside the industrial complexes of Wilton International and Teesport. The borough benefits from many natural assets, popular coastal resorts, the ancient market town of Guisborough and a strong industrial heritage. Yet Redcar and Cleveland has also faced significant challenges such as the decline in its traditional employment base and the cessation of steel making in Redcar, a reducing population and increasing urban disadvantage. The Local Plan provides the policy framework to meet these challenges and to deliver sustainable development across the borough.
    [Show full text]