DOCSLIB.ORG

Qualitygrowthstrategy.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Qualitygrowthstrategy.Pdf ENVISION UTAH QUALITY GROWTH STRATEGY AND TECHNICAL REVIEW January 2000 E NVISION U TAH •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• A Partnership for Quality Growth Keeping Utah Beautiful, Prosperous, and Neighborly for Future Generations Envision Utah • P.O. Box 30901 Salt Lake City, UT 84130 801-973-3307 www.envisionutah.org Sponsored by Coalition for Utah’s Future ENVISION UTAH Keeping Utah Beautiful, Prosperous, and Neighborly for Future Generations INTRODUCTION The urbanized area of Northern Utah is about state and local spending priorities. experiencing tremendous growth. The Greater Preparing for this growth also presents some Wasatch Area (GWA), which stretches from unique opportunities. For example, if we were Nephi to Brigham City, and from Kamas to able to reduce the size of average residential Grantsville, consists of 88 cities and towns, 10 lot from 0.35 acre to 0.29 acre, the total land counties, and numerous special service districts. area consumed by the next million people The GWA is currently home to 1.7 million would drop from 325 square miles of new land residents, who constitute 80% of the state’s to 154 square miles, and the amount of population, making Utah the sixth most urban agricultural land consumed by this growth state in the nation. The area’s developable private could drop from 143 square miles to just 27 land, which may total as little as 1000 square square miles. Thus, intensifying land uses miles, is surrounded by mountains, lakes, deserts, through infill in urbanized areas will ease the and public lands that form a natural growth pressure to develop new lands. boundary, within which nearly 370 square miles of A cost benefit analysis shows that if we adhere land is currently developed. By 2020 the area will to Envision Utah’s recommended goals and grow to 2.7 million residents, and will reach 5 strategies, we will save $4.5 billion in future million by 2050, placing additional demands on infrastructure costs over the next 20 years. We the limited supply of undeveloped private land. will conserve more land, provide more housing While most residents view this growth as choices, lower emissions resulting in less positive, they recognize that it can also introduce pollution, reduce water consumption and make a number of problems and challenges. For our transportation system more efficient with less example, these dramatic increases in population congestion on the roads. and land consumption will have profound impacts The impacts of growth may combine to on the quality of life and costs of living in the threaten the economic vitality of the area, which area. Air quality will suffer, new water sources has benefitted greatly from recent growth. If we will need to be developed, crowding and are judicious with our finite resources, and work congestion will increase, housing costs will diligently to preserve quality of life through the increase as land becomes limited, crime will strategies enumerated here, we can maintain the increase, business and personal costs will qualities that make the Greater Wasatch Area increase, and government spending on economically vibrant, aesthetically pleasing, and infrastructure will force some difficult decisions affordable for its residents. ENVISION UTAH QUALITY GROWTH STRATEGY SUMMARY Goals and Strategies to Maintain Quality of Life Through extensive research and exhaustive involvement of the • fostering transit-oriented development (housing and com- public, local and state elected officials, the business, civic, and mercial developments that incorporate and encourage vari- religious communities, and other stakeholders, Envision Utah has ous forms of public transportation); gathered information about what Greater Wasatch Area residents • preserving open lands by encouraging developments that value and how they think growth should be accommodated. This include open areas and by incentivizing reuse of currently involved research concerning core values, and workshops with developed lands; stakeholders, including elected officials, planning commissioners, • restructuring water bills to encourage water conservation; and and city council members, addressing where and how to grow. • fostering mixed-use, mixed-income, walkable neighbor- Above all else, residents like the people who live here, and place a hoods to provide a greater array of housing choices. high value on this area’s good atmosphere for raising a family, and its scenic beauty and recreational opportunities. There are other goals, equally important, that do not lend Based on this information, Envision Utah has identified six primary themselves as easily to a list of discrete strategies. Enhancing goals that need to be addressed in the Greater Wasatch Area if we economic development and adjusting the means by which cities are to protect our environment and maintain our economic vitality generate revenues are among the challenges. Nearly all of the goals and quality of life as we accommodate anticipated growth: identified will help to enhance economic opportunities in the state, and they should be pursued for this reason in addition to those listed. • enhance air quality; The issue of taxation and revenue relates to municipalities’ reliance • increase mobility and transportation choices; on sales tax revenues as a major source of income. This spurs • preserve critical lands, including agricultural, sensitive, and counterproductive competition among communities for regional strategic open lands and address the interaction between retailers, often resulting in sprawl development. This issue is so these lands and developed areas; complex and involves so many stakeholders that, while briefly • conserve and maintain availability of water addressed here as our seventh strategy, it will require further careful resources; consideration and extensive longer-term stakeholder involvement. • provide housing opportunities for a range of family and income types; and Envision Utah’s Role • maximize efficiency in public and infrastructure invest- The primary role for implementation falls on local governments, ments to promote the other goals. state and local incentives, and the actions of developers and consumers in the free market. Envision Utah’s objective is to analyze These goals can be realized over time by the careful and deliberate and disseminate the costs and benefits associated with these pursuit of various strategies, identified and explained here. strategies, and to work with local and state governments, citizens, developers, conservationists, civic groups, and other concerned To support each of these goals Envision Utah has worked with the stakeholders to pursue the strategies outlined below. Envision Utah stakeholders and the public to develop specific strategies, including will seek progress over time by working with the entities that hold strategies that utilize market-based approaches such as state and responsibility for these Quality Growth Strategies and by developing local incentives, and seeks to effect change through education and an awards program to recognize communities that put various promotion, rather than regulatory means. These strategies include: components into place. The action items range from consumer choices to intergovernmental cooperation to local and state decision • promoting walkable development (encouraging new and making, depending on the issue. Most of the strategies are existing developments to include a mix of uses with a incremental steps that can take place over time, provided the right pedestrian-friendly design); regulatory and market environment. Envision Utah’s role will be to • promoting the development of a region-wide transit system encourage the creation of that environment, so existing and (which could utilize buses, bus ways, light rail, lower-cost forecasted market demands can be met, while also maintaining the self-powered rail technology, commuter rail, and small pri- quality of life residents have come to enjoy and expect. Envision Utah vate buses) to make transit more effective and convenient; will do this by providing information and resources to community • promoting the development of a network of bikeways and leaders to broaden the choices available to them and to facilitate trails for recreation and commuting; more informed decision making. 1 market, such as condominiums, apartments, mother-in-law Local Control, Regional Coordination apartments, and town homes to accommodate different life stages. The primary responsibility for land use decisions will remain with Our market research also suggests an increasing demand for single- local governments. These strategies cannot be implemented family homes in a variety of sizes located on smaller lots. In the overnight, nor will they be appropriate to every situation or transportation area, the private vehicle will almost certainly remain community. Envision Utah’s efforts will always acknowledge that the overwhelming means by which we travel. There are, however, every community is unique, with distinctive characteristics and significant segments of the population who cannot use a car (such needs. In some communities, the open space preservation strategies as the elderly, disabled, and children), who cannot afford a car, or may be needed, where in others, affordable housing efforts may be would prefer not to use one if other choices were available. more appropriate. We encourage the implementation of these Providing more choices will also help us address our air quality strategies incrementally
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELECTION PREVIEW 2006 1 Introduction/ Executive Summary 55783 Tabs 10/10/06 8:52 PM Page 1 Page PM 8:52 10/10/06 55783 Tabs 55783 Textx2 10/19/06 11:00 PM Page 3
    55783_Covers 10/10/06 9:22 PM Page 2 ElectionElection previewpreview What’sWhat’s Changed,Changed, 20062006WhatWhat Hasn’tHasn’t andand WhyWhy 55783_Covers 10/10/06 9:22 PM Page 3 55783_TextX 10/19/06 5:56 AM Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS contents of Table Director’s Message . 3 Executive Summary . 5 TableStates to Watch. of. 7 Voting Systems: Widespread Changes, Problems . 12 Voting System Usage by State . 15 contentsVoter ID: Activity in the States and on the Hill . 19 Voter Verification Requirements by State . 22 Voter Registration Databases: A New Election Stumbling Block?. 23 Status of Statewide Voter Registration Databases. 28 Absentee Voting, Pre-election Voting and Provisional Voting Rules in the States. 30 State by State. 33 Methodology/Endnotes . 63 ELECTION PREVIEW 2006 1 Introduction/ Executive Summary 55783_Tabs 10/10/06 8:52 PM Page 1 55783_TextX2 10/19/06 11:00 PM Page 3 his was the year that election reform was finally supposed The election process changed more in 2006 than in any year message from the director Tto come together. since the disputed 2000 Presidential election. Consequently, on the eve of a national election in which control of Congress This was the year that the various deadlines embodied in the is in play — and two years from an open seat election for Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) took effect: the White House — it is vitally important to understand What’s computerized statewide voter lists, new voting technology, Changed, What Hasn’t and Why. improved accessibility for voters with disabilities and a host Messageof other procedural and legal requirements mandated as part As always, we have enjoyed preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter02.Pdf
    Fall 2002 sion at the University. A committee has Now I am sounding like a politician get- From the Director been formed. Could the Institute become ting ready to run for re-election. But I am a center for policy work? Should it seek so proud of what we have done, and of the expansion? How about new programs? great work of our staff, that I just want to These are just some of the questions the crow a little. Please excuse me. And I am committee will explore. After thirty-seven not running again! years of excellence, “If it ain’t broke, don’t I still need to work. I’m looking for fix it,” must apply. But it is also timely to some consulting opportunities. I would look to the future. like to hang out here through some teach- I often contemplate the wonderful char- ing. I will aid the new director as coal sketch of our founder Robert H. requested. The Hinckley Institute of Hinckley by Alvin Gittins that warms my Politics and the University of Utah will office. The eyes focus on the future. The remain a big part of my life. face is filled with compassion yet reflects a But there are mountains to climb- no-non-sense attitude. Par-ti-ci-pa-tion - as motorcycles to rev-grandchildren to hug- Mr. Hinckley said it while emphasizing and “many a mile before I sleep.” every syllable - is what we are about. And participation is what my staff and I have sought to deliver. I will miss my second family.
    [Show full text]
  • 5315 Annualreport2007.Pdf
    ~~ ?/(J Dillon Swenson Kabree Briggs Abigail Roberts Cecelia Roden Ahearn Rianne Rylie Cerino Tara Dailey Cole Woodley Andrew Fellows Tao Henning Matthew Guess Emily Corral Valencia Audrey Coffey Payton Sauer Jeremy Rowe Markie Montes Brent Russell Olivia Swank Marisa Carreno Matthew Crockett Baby Black Kylynn Fitzgerald Gavin Bailey Caylor Bird Ian Pearson Michael "Travis" Ewell PJoah Wyman , Baby Newman ~ustin Morgan r;, CU4 ~~ cT ~~ 1Ic~ ~o/~ ?~~ My family and I recently had an opportunity to share a little bit of the burden of these families with very prepare and serve dinner to the families staying at sick children so that they can focus their time, attention the Ronald McDonald House here in Salt Lake City. and energy on helping their children get well. It's important It was a Sunday evening, and after the initial scurrying work, and it's work the Ronald McDonald House of the about to get organized and set the food out, we Intermountain Area does very well. had a chance to interact with some of the families. There was the woman from Montana with her two In 2007, our Ronald McDonald House provided a "home daughters, ages two and four. The two-year-old is away from home" for approximately 1,728 families, who receiving treatment for a congenital heart defect, came to us from Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, and the four-year-old was concerned that her sister and Utah. These families stayed with us for an average might not be drinking enough milk. There was the of seven days and, thanks to our board and hundreds of single mother from Nevada, whose premature baby volunteers, meals were waiting for them each evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    September 10-12, 2008 Gas prices Utah League of Cities and Towns Debt Inflation 101st Annual Convention Insurance Cost of food What’s Asphalt Up, Housing prices Sales tax revenue What’s Down Residential construction Making Life Better At our 100th Annual Convention last September, we unveiled our “Making Life Better Campaign.” One year later, many cities and towns around the state are using it to communicate the services and events that are provided for their residents. Around the hotel you’ll see a number of banners and signs that highlight what communities around the state are doing to make life better. Check our website, ulct.org, for more information about the campaign. THANKS TO OUR CONFERENCE SPONSORS Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Cate Equipment Company Comcast Energy Solutions Gold Cross Ambulance Intermountain Healthcare Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham, Inc. Maverick Questar Rio Tinto Rocky Mountain Power UAMPS Union Pacific Utah Local Governments Trust Zions Bank Zions Bank Public Finance Wal-Mart Waste Management of Utah General Table Information of CONTENTS Introduction . 2 All events and sessions will be held at the Sheraton City Centre with the exception President’s Message . 3 of Wednesday night’s event which will be held at The Gateway. Entertainment . 4 Please turn cell phones and audible pagers off during all meetings, workshops, general sessions, luncheons, etc. Speaker Highlights ................................................ 6 Business Session Agenda ......................................... 10 Parking: Parking at the Sheraton City Centre is free for all ULCT conference attendees and vendors. 2008 Essay Contest Winners . 11 Activities at a Glance ............................................. 12 Registration Desk Hours Sheraton City Centre Map ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System
    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates The Politics and Process of Utah’s Unique Convention and Primary System HIGHLIGHTS For most of its history, Utah has used a convention- g Utah is one of only seven states that still uses a primary system to nominate candidates for elected office. convention, and the only one that allows political parties to preclude a primary election for major In the spring of election years, citizens in small caucus offices if candidates receive enough delegate votes. g Utah adopted a direct primary in 1937, a system meetings held throughout the state elect delegates to which lasted 10 years. represent them at county and state conventions. County g In 1947, the Legislature re-established a caucus- convention system. If a candidate obtained 70% or conventions nominate candidates for races solely within more of the delegates’ votes in the convention, he or she was declared the nominee without a primary. the county boundaries, while the state convention is used g In the 1990s, the Legislature granted more power to the parties to manage their conventions. In 1996, to nominate candidates for statewide offices or those the 70% threshold to avoid a primary was lowered to 60% by the Democratic Party. The Republican that serve districts that span multiple counties. At these Party made the same change in 1999. conventions, delegates nominate candidates to compete g Utah’s historically high voter turnout rates have consistently declined in recent decades. In 1960, for their party’s nomination in the primary election, or, 78.3% of the voting age population voted in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah State University Commencement, 1960 – Main Campus
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Commencement Programs Students 6-3-1960 Utah State University Commencement, 1960 – Main Campus Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/commencement Recommended Citation Utah State University, "Utah State University Commencement, 1960 – Main Campus" (1960). Commencement Programs. 2. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/commencement/2 This Commencement Program - Main Campus is brought to you for free and open access by the Students at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Commencement Programs by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. /3. 2) 1'1 &o 6 17U7'-i4'-L<...--nut-,..::1 ..___ fro 9 r(L.,.-y.._ Annual Commencement Logan GEORGE NELSON FIELDHOUSE FRIDAY, J.UNE THIRD SATURDAY, JuNE FouRTH NINETEEN HUNDRED SIXTY THE ACADEMIC PROCESSION President and Board of Trustees 0 fficial Guests University Administrative Officers Faculties of the Various Colleges Candidates for Graduate Degrees Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees DRESS The wearing of academic costume by faculty arc of a circle near the bottom. The arm extends and student participants at the time of Commence­ through the slit, giving the appearance of short ment Exercises has become traditional among sleeves. The hood consists of material similar universities. The color and pageantry of these to the gown and lined with the official academic occasions are designed to indicate the degree of color of the institution conferring the degree. I£ academic achievement of those who actively par­ the institution has more than one color, the chev­ ticipate in such exercises. In order for the ron is used to display the second color.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah League of Cities & Towns Board of Directors Meeting
    UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES & TOWNS BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING LOCATION: VIA ZOOM MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2020 @ 12:00 PM (TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE) 1. Welcome and Introductions – Mayor Mike Caldwell, ULCT President 12:00 PM 2. Administrative Items – Mayor Mike Caldwell, ULCT President 12:03 PM ACTIONS: Reading of Determination Regarding Conducting ULCT Public Meetings w/o Anchor Location, Review & Approval of Minutes, Call for conflict of interest disclosure HANDOUTS: Determination Regarding Conducting ULCT Public Meetings w/o Anchor Location DRAFT October 19, 2020 Minutes Preferred Contact Info Survey (LINK) 3. Board of Directors Membership Update – Mayor Dawn Ramsey, ULCT 2nd VP 12:08 PM ACTION: Appoint Eureka Mayor J. Nicholson Castleton to ULCT Board of Directors 4. ULCT Website Unveiling – Susan Wood, Director of Communication 12:10 PM ACTION: For information HANDOUT: www.ulct.org (LINK) 5. Advocacy, Engagement, & Outreach Update – Victoria Ashby, Director of Government Relations & Katie Harley, Events and Strategic Partnership Coordinator 12:13 PM • 2021 Virtual Legislative Session, Local Officials Day, and January Board meeting ACTION: Consider change in date and time of January Board meeting HANDOUT: ULCT Legislative Priority Tiers *Strategic Goals: Advocacy Goal #1, Advocacy Goal #2 6. Love, Listen, Lead – Cameron Diehl, Executive Director, Spanish Fork Council Member Mike Mendenhall, & Y2 Analytics 12:20 PM ACTION: Discussion of survey results and next steps 7. Transition Team for Governor-Elect Spencer Cox –Cameron Diehl, Executive Director
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
    S. HRG. 114–178 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Fiscal Year 2016 114th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2578 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE—OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2016 (H.R. 2578) S. HRG. 114–178 COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2578 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF COM- MERCE AND JUSTICE, AND SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Department of Commerce—Office of the Secretary Department of Justice—Office of the Attorney General Drug Enforcement Administration Federal Bureau of Investigation National Aeronautics and Space Administration Nondepartmental Witnesses United States Marshals Service Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=senate&committee=appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 93–106 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman MITCH McCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah League of Cities & Towns Board of Directors Meeting
    UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES & TOWNS BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING LOCATION: VIA ZOOM MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2020 @ 12:00 PM (TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE) 1. Welcome and Introductions – Council Member Mike Mendenhall, ULCT President 12:00 PM 2. Review & Approval of Minutes – Council Member Mike Mendenhall, ULCT President 12:03 PM ACTION: Review & Approval of Minutes HANDOUT: June 15, 2020 Minutes 3. Conflict of Interest Disclosure – Council Member Mike Mendenhall, ULCT President 12:05 PM ACTION: Disclosure of any potential conflict of interest with agenda items HANDOUT: None 4. ULCT Staffing Update: General Counsel and Land Use Legal Consultant – Cameron Diehl, Executive Director 12:07 PM ACTION: For information and discussion HANDOUT: None 5. Love, Listen, Lead – Council Member Mike Mendenhall, ULCT President, Cameron Diehl, Executive Director, & Kyrene Gibb, Partner and Vice President of Research, Y2 Analytics 12:15 PM ACTION: For information & feedback HANDOUTS: Love, Listen, Lead Update & Y2 Analytics Questions to Ponder *Strategic Goals: Training Goal #2, Communication Goal #1 6. COVID-19: ULCT Update – Cameron Diehl, Executive Director 12:38 PM • Annual Convention 2020: “Respond, Recover, Reimagine” • CARES Act Allocation • Potential 4th Stimulus ACTION: For information and discussion HANDOUT: None *Strategic Goals: Training Goal #2, Finance/Administration Goal #2 7. Review and Approval of June & July Check Registers – Nick Jarvis, Chief Operating Officer 12:48 PM ACTION: Review and Approve June & July 2020 Check Registers HANDOUT: June & July 2020 Check Registers 8. FY 2020 Year-End Financial Report (July 2019 – June 2020) – Nick Jarvis, Chief Operating Officer 12:53 PM ACTION: Review & approval of FY 2020 Year-End Report HANDOUT: FY 2020 Q4 Unaudited Financial Report 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Participation
    PARTICIPATION A LOOK BACK AT 2007 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum “OUR YOUNG, BEST MINDS MUST BE ENCOURAGED TO ENTER POLITICS.” Robert H. Hinckley 2 In This Issue Dr. J.D. Williams Page 3 Hinckley News Page 4 Internship Programs Page 8 Outstanding Interns Page 16 Scholarships Page 18 PARTICIPATION Hinckley Forums Page 20 Alumni Spotlights Page 25 Hinckley Staff Page 26 Donors Page 28 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum Since 1965, the Hinckley Institute has held more than 2,000 Hinckley Forums (previously known as “Coffee & Politics”) featuring local, national, and international political leaders. Hinckley Forums provide University of Utah students and the surrounding community intimate access to and interaction with our nation’s leaders. Under the direction of Hinck- ley Institute assistant director Jayne Nelson, the Hinckley Institute hosts 65-75 forums each year in the newly renovated Hinckley Caucus Room. Partnerships with supporting Univer- sity of Utah colleges and departments, local radio and news stations, our generous donors, and the Sam Rich Program in International Politics ensure the continued success of the Hinckley Forums program. University of Utah students can now receive credit for attend- ing Hinckley Forums by enrolling in the Political Forum Series course (Political Science 3910). All Hinckley Forums are free and open to the public. For a detailed listing of 2007 Hinckley Forums, refer to pages 20 – 24. Past Hinckley Forum Guests Prince Turki Al-Faisal Archibald Cox Edward Kennedy Frank Moss Karl Rove Al Saud Russ Feingold William Lawrence Ralph Nader Larry Sabato Norman Bangerter Gerald Ford Michael Leavitt Richard Neustadt Brian Schweitzer Robert Bennett Jake Garn Richard Lugar Dallin H.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013
    Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013 Prepared by the Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership Baker, Nevada i ii Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan September 23, 2011 Plans prepared previously by several National Heritage Areas provided inspiration for the framework and format for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan. National Park Service staff and documents provided guidance. We gratefully acknowledge these contributions. This Management Plan was made possible through funding provided by the National Park Service, the State of Nevada, the State of Utah and the generosity of local citizens. 2011 Great Basin National Heritage Area Disclaimer Restriction of Liability The Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership (GBHAP) and the authors of this document have made every reasonable effort to insur e accuracy and objectivity in preparing this plan. However, based on limitations of time, funding and references available, the parties involved make no claims, promises or guarantees about the absolute accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this document and expressly disclaim liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this plan. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, is given with respect to the contents of this document or its references. Reference in this document to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the inf ormation and convenience of the public, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the GBHAP or the authors.
    [Show full text]