DOCSLIB.ORG

SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study MP 2.04 to MP 3.57 March 2018 Olympic Region Multimodal Planning P. O. Box 47440 Olympia, WA 98504-7440 Phone: 360-357-2600 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA(4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Under 23 U.S. Code § 409, safety data, reports, surveys, schedules, lists compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential crash sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings are not subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OLYMPIC REGION SR 160 LONG LAKE ROAD SE PLANNING STUDY Study Limits: SR 160 / Phillips Road SE to Mayvolt Road SE / Lake Valley Road SE Milepost 2.04 to Milepost 3.57 Approved by: Concurrence: Concurrence: Concurrence: SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... ES - 1 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... Page 1-1 1.1 What is the purpose of the Study ................................................................. Page 1-2 1.2 What are the Study Limits ............................................................................ Page 1-3 1.3 How was the Study Funded ......................................................................... Page 1-5 1.4 Why study this Highway Segment ................................................................ Page 1-5 Chapter 2: Route Characteristics ................................................................................ Page 2-1 2.1 What is the character and land use in the study area ................................. Page 2-2 2.2 Who are the users along the Corridor ......................................................... Page 2-3 2.3 What are the Safety Concerns ..................................................................... Page 2-4 2.4 What are the Environmental Resources ...................................................... Page 2-4 2.5 What are the Different Modes of Travel ....................................................... Page 2-6 Chapter 3: Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation ...................................................... Page 3-1 3.1 What are the Alternatives ........................................................................... Page 3-2 3.2 What Safety Analysis was conducted ......................................................... Page 3-2 3.3 What Traffic Operations Analysis was conducted ........................................ Page 3-5 3.4 What is the Estimated Cost of each Alternative ......................................... Page 3-10 3.5 How were the Alternatives Evaluated ........................................................ Page 3-11 Chapter 4: Community Engagement .......................................................................... Page 4-1 4.1 How the Stakeholder Committee Participated in the Study ........................... Page 4-2 4.2 What We Heard from the Community .......................................................... Page 4-4 Chapter 5: Final Recommendations and Next Steps ................................................. Page 5-1 5.1 What is the Final Recommendation ............................................................. Page 5-2 5.2 What additional work has been done ........................................................... Page 5-2 5.3 What are the Next Steps .............................................................................. Page 5-4 Table of Contents SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study March 2018 Appendices Appendix A – Safety and Traffic Analysis Appendix B – Stakeholder Committee Meetings Appendix C – Community Engagement Comments Appendix D – Recommended Alternative Profiles and Scoping Work List of Figures Figure 1 – Safety Priority Programming and Public Process ........................................ Page 1-2 Figure 2 – SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Study Area ....................................................... Page 1-4 Figure 3 – Study Timeline ............................................................................................. Page 1-5 Figure 4 – Kitsap County Land Use map (June 2016) .................................................... Page 2-3 Figure 5 – Environmental Resources ............................................................................. Page 2-5 Figure 6 – SR 160 & Long Lake Rd Intersection Related Crashes (2011-2015) ............. Page 3-4 Figure 7 – SR 160 & Long Lake Road Conceptual Roundabout ..................................... Page 5-3 List of Tables Table 1 – Summary of Long Lake Road Intersection Crash Data (2011-2015). .............. Page 3-3 Table 2 – Safety Analysis Results. ................................................................................. Page 3-5 Table 3 – 2016 Existing Intersection Conditions. ............................................................ Page 3-6 Table 4 – 2016 Existing Mainline Conditions .................................................................. Page 3-7 Table 5 – Historic Growth Rates .................................................................................... Page 3-7 Table 6 – Traffic Analysis 2016 and 2036 AM and PM Intersection LOS ........................ Page 3-9 Table 7 – Traffic Analysis 2036 AM and PM Peak Mainline LOS ................................. Page 3-10 Table 8 – Alternatives Cost Estimates .......................................................................... Page 3-11 Table 9 – Evaluation Criteria Point System .................................................................. Page 3-11 Table 10 – Alternatives and Criteria Information ........................................................... Page 3-12 Table 11 – Alternatives Scoring Results ....................................................................... Page 3-13 Table of Contents SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study March 2018 ________________________________________ Executive Summary Page ES - 1 SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study March 2018 Executive Summary Why did we study the SR 160 Long Lake Road SE intersection? The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) identified the intersection of State Route (SR) 160 (Sedgwick Road SE) and Long Lake Road Southeast as a safety concern through the WSDOT Target Zero Highway Safety Plan due to the crash type, the frequency and the Study Need number of serious injury crashes. In 2010 and again in 2016 this intersection was on the Intersection Analysis Location (IAL) list. In the fall of 2016, WSDOT began the SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Study with the study limits being SR 160 from Phillips Road to Mayvolt Road/Lake Valley Road (shown in the Study Area Map). The goal of the study was to identify solutions to reduce or eliminate serious injury crashes occurring at the intersection. The WSDOT study team and the stakeholder committee developed a needs statement to guide the study. The needs statement reads, “SR 160 and Long Lake Road SE is an at-grade two- way stop intersection that is experiencing a number of severe injury crashes. The need of the study is to develop potential solutions to improve the safety at the intersection in a way that will balance local and regional needs while also managing highway performance”. Study Area Map Page ES - 2 SR 160 Long Lake Road SE Planning Study March 2018 How was the study conducted? WSDOT staff working with a stakeholder committee and local community members developed and evaluated five potential alternatives in this study process. The stakeholder committee included representatives from Kitsap County, Kitsap Transit, the US Navy, the Suquamish Tribe and WSDOT Headquarters and Olympic Region. WSDOT held two stakeholder Process committee meetings to develop and evaluate potential alternatives. The committee also aided with establishing four criteria (improves safety, improves operations, cost and multimodal), for evaluating each alternative. As part of the study, two public meetings occurred, which provided an opportunity to gather input and share information with local community members. Chapter 4, Appendix B and Appendix C contain more information about the community engagement efforts. What alternatives were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Behavior-Based Framework for Assessing Barrier Effects to Wildlife from Vehicle Traffic Volume 1 Sandra L
    CONCEPTS & THEORY A behavior-based framework for assessing barrier effects to wildlife from vehicle traffic volume 1 Sandra L. Jacobson,1,† Leslie L. Bliss-Ketchum,2 Catherine E. de Rivera,2 and Winston P. Smith3,4 1 1USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, California 95618 USA 1 2Department of Environmental Science & Management, School of the Environment, 1 Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 USA 1 3USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, La Grande, Oregon 97850 USA 1 Citation: Jacobson, S. L., L. L. Bliss-Ketchum, C. E. de Rivera, and W. P. Smith. 2016. A behavior-based framework for assessing barrier effects to wildlife from vehicle traffic volume. Ecosphere 7(4):e01345. 10.1002/ecs2.1345 Abstract. Roads, while central to the function of human society, create barriers to animal movement through collisions and habitat fragmentation. Barriers to animal movement affect the evolution and tra- jectory of populations. Investigators have attempted to use traffic volume, the number of vehicles passing a point on a road segment, to predict effects to wildlife populations approximately linearly and along taxonomic lines; however, taxonomic groupings cannot provide sound predictions because closely related species often respond differently. We assess the role of wildlife behavioral responses to traffic volume as a tool to predict barrier effects from vehicle-caused mortality and avoidance, to provide an early warning system that recognizes traffic volume as a trigger for mitigation, and to better interpret roadkill data. We propose four categories of behavioral response based on the perceived danger to traffic: Nonresponders, Pausers, Speeders, and Avoiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Wildlife Roadkill Mitigation
    Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 3 (2015) 42-51 doi: 10.17265/2328-2142/2015.01.005 D DAVID PUBLISHING Effective Wildlife Roadkill Mitigation Dion Lester Pitt&Sherry, Hobart 7000, Australia Abstract: The effects of wildlife roadkill on native animal populations can be significant and the cost to people of wildlife collisions, through road crash injuries and vehicle damage, can be also significant. An understanding of roadkill causes and patterns is necessary for successful management intervention. How animals perceive, use and cross roads can vary significantly from road to road and also between different sections of the same road. This study sought to better understand the features of roadkill and successful mitigation options for a 93 km section of road in Tasmania’s northwest. A program of baseline monitoring, analysis and trial sites informed the development of a risk based strategy for mitigating roadkill. The trial mitigation sites experienced a 50% reduction in roadkill compared with the levels prior to implementation of the trials. A number of simple, low maintenance and cost effective mitigation measures were established and offer road managers elsewhere additional options for reducing roadkill on their roads. Key words: Roadkill, mitigation, wildlife, environmental management, roads, adaptive management. 1. Introduction animals [4]. In a study in 2000 of National Transport Agency data, Attewell and Glase [5] found that, from This article describes an adaptive management 1990-1997, there were 94 fatalities and 1,392 approach taken to mitigate wildlife roadkill on the hospitalisations from crashes involving animals within proposed Tarkine Forest Drive project in northwest Australia. While Rowden et al.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 68 Scenic Highway Plan
    2019 ITE Western District Annual Meeting: SR 68 Scenic Highway Plan SR 68 Scenic Highway Plan Jim Damkowitch, GHD, Grant Leonard, City of Monterey, Rich Deal, Transportation Agency for Monterey County The SR 68 Scenic Highway Plan is a precedent setting corridor plan that integrates multimodal transportation planning with wildlife connectivity planning and a robust public outreach strategy. When implemented, the plan will result in the first Roundabout Corridor on a state highway in California, provide wildlife crossing structures and an enhanced sense of character for the community while reducing delay and GHG emissions. The SR 68 corridor serves several very important functions. The only direct route between Salinas and Monterey, it is a critical transportation lifeline for many residents and businesses along and on either end of the route. It is one of the few east-west connections in the region providing access to US 101, the Monterey Regional Airport, the Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, and the Fort Ord National Monument. It is one of the first designated scenic corridors in California, with iconic value to Monterey County, its residents, and visitors. However, traffic during peak commute periods, special events, or when corridor capacity is reduced by a collision, construction activity, or weather events has become severely congested and less reliable. This has degraded the quality of life for those who rely on the corridor for job access, commerce, airport access and recreational access. As an example, the MST, the principal transit provider for the area, severely reduced transit service on SR 68 due to its inability to adhere to schedule performance.
    [Show full text]
  • GETTING up to SPEED: a Conservationist's Guide to Wildlife
    DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. Defenders launched the Habitat and Highways Campaign in 2000 to reduce the impacts of GETTING UP TO SPEED: surface transportation on our nation’s wildlife and natural resources. Author: Patricia A. White A Conservationist’s Guide Director, Habitat and Highways Campaign Research: Jesse Feinberg To Wildlife and Highways Technical Review: Alex Levy Editing: Krista Schlyer Design: 202design ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Defenders of Wildlife is grateful to the Surdna Foundation for their generous support of our Habitat and Highways Campaign and this publication. We also thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Ann Adler Kerri Gray Yates Opperman Steve Albert Chris Haney Terry Pelster Paul J. Baicich Jennifer Leigh Hopwood Jim Pissot Bill Branch Sandy Jacobson Robert Puentes Arnold Burnham Noah Kahn John Rowen Josh Burnim Julia Kintsch Bill Ruediger Carolyn Campbell Keith Knapp Inga Sedlovsky Barbara Charry Dianne Kresich Shari Shaftlein Gabriella Chavarria Michael Leahy Chris Slesar Patricia Cramer Alex Levy Richard Solomon Kim Davitt Laura Loomis Allison Srinivas Monique DiGiorgio Bonnie Harper Lore Graham Stroh Bridget Donaldson Laurie MacDonald Stephen Tonjes Bob Dreher Noah Matson Rodney Vaughn Gary Evink Kevin McCarty Marie Venner Emily Ferry Jim McElfish Paul Wagner Elizabeth Fleming Gary McVoy Jen Watkins Richard Forman Louisa Moore Mark Watson Kathy Fuller Jim Motavalli Jessica Wilkinson Chester Fung Carroll Muffett Kathleen Wolf Sean Furniss Siobhan Nordhaugen Paul Garrett Leni Oman © 2007 Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, N.W. | Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadkill Carcass Composting
    ROADKILL CARCASS COMPOSTING Guidance Manual November 2007 Starting a Road Kill Compost Facility Before any composting project can begin, MDT must obtain a license from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Solid Waste Program. Roadkill Compost Operations are considered to be a Small Composter Waste Management Facility. Currently, there is no fee required to compost road kill. DEQ will maintain a database of our composting facilities to track their progress and to answer questions from MDT and the general public. The licensing process requires a 30 day public comment period after the Environmental Assessment (EA) is completed. The license application and the list of neighbors should be complete to expedite the process. Licensing questions can be directed to the Hazardous Waste Section of MDT’s Environmental Services Bureau (Cora Helm, 406-444-7659, Pat Driscoll 406-444-7223). License application forms are available online from the DEQ website at: http://www.deq.mt.gov/SolidWaste/newapplications/compost.pdf. Supervisors and staff considering undertaking this process should visit another MDT facility that is composting road kill to see if it is right for their area of operations and to gain tips on proper facility operations. Coordination with DEQ is essential for the success of these projects. DEQ also has the authority and responsibility to inspect all waste management facilities in Montana, so expect visits (inspections) from the Solid Waste Program of DEQ. DEQ can also be called upon for license application assistance or help with operational problems. This Guidance Document may be referenced in the license application as the general plan of operations required by the DEQ, but does not have to be submitted to the DEQ as part of the license application since they already have the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Summary
    COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY SURVEY INTRO An Online Survey that consisted of survey questions and an interactive map was available for a 60 day period between June 30, 2020 and July 30, 2020. 550 participants shared their insights on general corridor needs as well as on location or category specific concerns. The survey was posted on the City website. Links to the survey were distributed via postcards mailed to residents and businesses along the corridor, printed flyers were placed at key locations along the corridor. In addition to printing notices for the survey, E-newsletters (The Stack and Leaflet), HOAs newsletters and various City Social Media Outlets 2 HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA CHAPTERONLINE SURVEY 1 · INVENTORY SUMMARY Online Pinnable Map with Comments SURVEY SUMMARY The majority of survey comments come from residents along the corridor and/or users that travel it regularly. Participants primarily experience the corridor by driving or walking. The first priority for overall improvement for the corridor is safer and more comfortable sidewalks. The next priorities for the corridor are reducing auto congestion and speeds. The highest ranking for the top 3 combined priorities are better landscaping, improving the pedestrian experience and traffic calming measures. For the write in comments, some emerging trends were in the following areas: • High Speeds in Multiple Locations • Participants shared there is often roadkill • High speeds for vehicle traveling downhill • High Speeds makes U-Turns and Left hand turns challenging at spots.(Spencer,
    [Show full text]
  • Roadkill Hotspots on California Highways 2016 Report
    2016 UC Davis Road Ecology Center Fraser Shilling, Ph.D., Co-Director Wildlife-Vehicle Conflict Hotspots along California Highways (2009-2015): Carcasses Using data from the California Roadkill Observation System (http://wildlifecrossing.net/California), the Road Ecology Center has mapped stretches of highway that are likely to be hotspots for wildlife-vehicle conflicts (WVC). This Report This report provides an overview of wildlife-vehicle conflict (WVC) hotspots on California highways, based on carcass observations in the California Roadkill Observation System (http://wildlifecrossing.net/California). Analytical details are available from the report author upon request. A subsequent report will focus on WVC hotspots from the point of view of crash and other incident data collected by state safety agencies. Photo acknowledgements Mule deer, black bear, river otter – Fraser Shilling Broad-footed mole – Kathryn Harrold Data collection acknowledgements This report and the analyses contained within would not have been possible without the concerted and coordinated efforts of hundreds of volunteer roadkill observers over the last 7 years. Through their endeavors, they have collected >50,000 observations of >410 species, representing one of the largest and most comprehensive wildlife monitoring programs in California. Their accuracy rates for species identification are >93% and have measurably high locational accuracy (<+100 meters). Special thanks to Dr. David Waetjen who developed the California Roadkill Observation System with me in his spare time, putting in hundreds of hours of programming and his own roadkill observations. The Author Fraser Shilling is the Co-Director of the UC Davis Road Ecology Center (http://roadecology.ucdavis.edu). He actively investigates the impacts of transportation systems on natural systems and human communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Environment Study Addendum
    Natural Environment Study Addendum State Route 1 HOV Lanes Tier I Corridor Analysis of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternatives (05 SCR-1-PM 7.24-16.13) and Tier II Build Project Analysis 41st Avenue to Soquel Avenue/Drive Auxiliary Lanes and Chanticleer Avenue Pedestrian-Bicycle Overcrossing (05 SCR-1-PM 13.5-14.9) EA 0C7300 April 2018 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to Caltrans, Attn: Matt Fowler, California Department of Transportation – District 5, 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401; 805-542-4603 Voice, or use the California Relay Service 1 (800) 735-2929 (TTY), 1 (800) 735-2929 (Voice), or 711. This page intentionally left blank. State Route 1 HOV Lanes Project Natural Environmental Study Addendum CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT STUDY ADDENDUM METHODS .......................................... 1 2 RESOURCES AND IMPACTS EVALUATION............................................................................... 1 2.1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SPECIES ....................................................................................... 1 2.2 SPECIAL STATUS ANIMAL SPECIES .................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 California
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Roadkill Patterns in a Fragmented Landscape of the Western Amazon
    Received: 29 May 2019 | Revised: 24 April 2020 | Accepted: 27 April 2020 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6394 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Wildlife roadkill patterns in a fragmented landscape of the Western Amazon Jonathan Filius1 | Yntze van der Hoek2,3 | Pablo Jarrín-V4 | Pim van Hooft1 1Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Abstract Wageningen, The Netherlands One of the most evident and direct effects of roads on wildlife is the death of animals 2 Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, by vehicle collision. Understanding the spatial patterns behind roadkill helps to plan Tena, Ecuador 3The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of roads on animal populations. However, Musanze, Rwanda although roadkill patterns have been extensively studied in temperate zones, the po- 4 Grupo de Población y Ambiente, tential impacts of roads on wildlife in the Neotropics have received less attention Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena, Ecuador and are particularly poorly understood in the Western Amazon. Here, we present the results of a study on roadkill in the Amazon region of Ecuador; a region that is Correspondence Jonathan Filius, Wildlife Ecology and affected by a rapidly increasing development of road infrastructure. Over the course Conservation Group, Wageningen University of 50 days, in the wet season between September and November 2017, we searched & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] for road-killed vertebrates on 15.9 km of roads near the city of Tena, Napo prov- ince, for a total of 1,590 surveyed kilometers. We recorded 593 dead specimens, predominantly reptiles (237 specimens, 40%) and amphibians (190, 32%), with birds (102, 17%) and mammals (64, 11%) being less common.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of the Road
    Rules of the Road The 2017 State of Wyoming DRIVER LICENSE MANUAL - 1 - Table of contents RULES OF THE ROAD ..........................................36 Speed ................................................................ 36 CUSTOMER SERVICE GUIDE ................................ 3 Legal speed limits (All unless otherwise posted) .......................................................36 Driver licensing .................................................. 3 Adjust speed for road conditions...........................................................................36 REQUIREMENTS TO DRIVE ..........................................................................................3 Adjust speed for traffic conditions .........................................................................36 THOSE WHO DO NOT NEED A WYOMING DRIVER LICENSE.....................................3 Adjust speed for light conditions...........................................................................37 WHO CANNOT GET A WYOMING DRIVER LICENSE...................................................3 Right of way ...........................................................................................................37 YOUR WYOMING LICENSE..........................................................................................4 Roundabouts..........................................................................................................40 Driver license classes ................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Wildlife Ohio Department of Natural Resources SPRING 2016
    Division of Wildlife Ohio Department of Natural Resources SPRING 2016 FURBEARER ROADKILL SURVEY In 1979, the ODNR Division of Wildlife (division) began conducting roadkill surveys in March, April, July, and August for furbearers and small game mammals. These surveys allowed the division to monitor relative changes in population sizes. From 1979-2002, species recorded on the survey routes included raccoons (Procyon lotor ), muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus ), foxes (gray [ Urocyon cinereoargenteus ] and red foxes [Vulpes vulpes ] combined), opossums (Didelphis virginiana ), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis ), mink ( Mustela vison ), woodchucks (Marmota monax ), eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus ), and tree squirrels (gray [ Sciurus carolinensis ] and fox squirrels [Sciurus niger ] combined). In 2003, surveys were limited to spring (March and April) and observations limited to raccoons, opossums, skunks, and woodchucks. Roadkill surveys provide the most reliable indices to population change for relatively abundant species. Further, larger bodied species (e.g., raccoons) are more likely to persist on the road and be more visible than smaller bodied ones (e.g., gray squirrels). Spring roadkill surveys provided adequate information regarding population trends for these species, without additional summer (July and August) surveys. METHODS Forty-nine 40-mile survey routes were distributed throughout Ohio. Routes were driven three times during March and again in April (6 replicates per route), with at least seven days between surveys. Routes were driven in the morning at speeds of less than or equal to 40 miles per hour. The number of road-killed raccoons, opossums, skunks, and woodchucks were tabulated by species. Roadkill surveys are an efficient way to index population size of medium-to-large-bodied mammals that are frequently found on roads.
    [Show full text]
  • ROAD KILL an American Western Myth, in Reverse
    ROAD KILL An American Western Myth, in reverse By Karen JP Howes Synopsis: A dark comedy that starts with a fat woman in a watermelon print dress who lies dead in the restroom of a roadside restaurant in the middle-of-nowhere. Oddly, she isn’t the only one dead, and the folks who try to jimmy open the restroom door are indirectly connected to each other and the woman’s death. The play moves in reverse, from 8 pm to 3 pm, untangling the relationships between the characters and shedding light on the reason for the fat woman’s death. Karen JP Howes [email protected] 678-467-7552 Agent: Marta Praeger Robert Freedman Dramatic Agency 1501 Broadway, suite 2310 New York, NY 10036 212-840-5760 c. all rights reserved. February 2016 2 CHARACTERS (doubling 4m, 3f) EDDIE LOGAN An attractive man in his 30s; a loner LANA Early 30s with cat eye glasses. Smart and quirky. EMMALINE An innocent 16 year old, totally and completely in love RUSSELL A strong and well built man in his late 20s LAURA MEYERS 30s with an air of sweet southern charm; five months pregnant. BILLY EVANS Of a distinguished nature that commands respect; 40s HUGH JOHNSON 30s and grounded. He projects an aura of serenity and security SONNY Rugged, physical, high self-esteem. Late 30s to late 40s BEAUREGARDE A muscular and good looking man of Native American lineage; 30’s MARIA LLORENTE 30s. Latino; teaches Tango JAMI LANDERS Male reporter and photographer. Late 20s to 30s KATHY Waitress/scientist about 30 DIANE Forties or more Doubling: Emmaline, Kathy Laura, Maria, Diane Lana Hugh, Jami Russell, Beau Billy, Sonny Eddie Place: A roadside diner off a country highway in Wyoming Time: The Present in reverse Music: The tone can be set with something like Handsome Family’s “Weightless Again.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkdjbk_G6pw&list=RDmkdjbk_G6pw On the structure of the play The play is comprised of 6 movements that take place at a lone coffee shop off a country highway 50 miles from the nearest town.
    [Show full text]