DOCSLIB.ORG

58Th BELGRADE WINNER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
58Th BELGRADE WINNER 58th BELGRADE WINNER Elite Men and Women Boxing Tournament 22-28 April, 2021 Belgrade - Serbia BOXING FEDERATION OF SERBIA Serbia, Belgrade, Masarikova 5, XX floor: 10, 11 [email protected] www.sbf.rs +381114038073, +381692658381, +381641845552 HALL “PINKI” ZEMUN Gradski park 2, 11080, Belgrade, Serbia Application for Cup E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] INVITATION 58th BELGRADE WINNER EVENT PERIOD Date: Phase: April 22 (Thuersday) Arrivals of Team Delegations April 23 (Friday) General Medical Check and Weigh-In, Official Draw, Elimination April 24 (Saturday) Daily Medical Check and Weigh-In, Eighth-finals April 25 (Sunday) Daily Medical Check and Weigh-In, Quarterfinals April 26 (Monday) Daily Medical Check and Weigh-In Semifinals April 27 (Tuesday) Daily Medical Check and Weigh-In Final April 28 (Wednesday) Departures ELIGIBILITY OF BOXER AND AGE CLASSIFICATION Elite Boxers (Men and Women) between the ages of 19 Age Classification: and 40 will be eligible to compete (born 1 January 1981 - 31 December 2002) Men: 8 Weight Categories: 52kg, 57kg, 63kg, 69kg, 75kg, 81kg, 91kg, +91kg Weight Classification Women: 10 Weight Categories: 48kg, 51kg, 54kg, 57kg, 60kg, 64kg, 69kg, 75kg, 81kg, +81kg NUMBER OF ROUNDS Men: Three (3) rounds of three (3) minutes, one (1) minute rest between rounds. Women: Three (3) rounds of three (3) minutes, one (1) minute rest between rounds. SCORING SYSTEM AIBA Scoring System, the 10-points Must System, will be used. REFEREES AND JUDGES Referees and judges must be mandatory AIBA Certified (1-3 Star). COMPOSITION OF THE DELEGATIONS Each team can have the following number of officials in its delegation: • 1 - 3 boxers: 1 officials + 1 AIBA R/J • 4 - 6 boxers: 2 officials + 1 AIBA R/J • 7 - 10 boxers: 3 officials + 1 AIBA R/J • Each R/J must have his international AIBA Record Book as well as medical exams up to date. • All coaches must be the AIBA Certified Coaches and registered in the AIBA Database as LOC will check each Coach’s status at the time of registration. REQUIREMENTS All Boxers must bring to the General Weigh-In the following documents: • International AIBA Competition Record Book and medical exams up to date • Valid Passport Each Team Delegation must bring the following: • National flag 1x 1.50m • National anthem (on MP3 or CD) Boxer’s Uniform: • Each boxer must bring two sets of uniform • The colors of these two sets of uniform must be in accordance with AIBA • Technical and Competition Rules BOXING EQUIPMENT: • LOC will provide licensed headguards and boxing gloves to all Boxers for all Bouts. The gloves are compulsory official items which all Boxers must wear, as they will not be allowed to wear personal ones. Headguards will be used according to AIBA Rules. • Gloves: Men • 10 oz Gloves will be used from Light Flyweight (49kg) to Light Welterweight category (64 kg). • 12 oz Gloves will be used from Welterweight category (69 kg) to Super Heavyweight category (91+ kg). • Gloves: Women • 10 oz Gloves will be used TRANSPORTATION: • All participants will be welcomed at Belgrade Airport “Nikola Tesla” and the LOC will arrange transportation from Airport to hotels. • Your Association will be responsible for travel expenses of your Delegation to/from Belgrade, and back to respective countries ACCOMODATION FOR TEAM DELEGATION: Room Rates for Team Delegations are as follows: • For single occupancy (1 person per room) - 70 Euros per person, per day, including 3 meals. (+1 EUR tourist tax per day, Total 71 EUR per day) • For double/triple occupancy (2/3 persons per room) - 50 Euros per person, per day, including 3 meals. (+1 EUR tourist tax per day, Total 51 EUR per day) Extra Team Officials: • Extra persons – who are over the number of the official delegation and teams arriving earlier than the 06th of April or leaving later than 12th of April will have to cover all the expences, 61 € per person in a day for their accommodation and full board in double rooms and 81 € per person in a day for their accommodation and full board in single rooms. All Team Delegations must pay the full room charges for the entire tournament period in CASH (in EURO) upon arrival. MEDICAL CARE The organizer will provide medical care and first-aid during the entire event to all participants who suffer from a sports injury contracted during the event. MEDALS A Gold medal will be awarded to the winner in each weight category, a silver medal to the runner-up. Bronze medals will be awarded to both semi-finalists. VISA: Those countries, who need entry visa to Serbia should contact Serbian Embassy in their countries. Also we kindly ask you to send to Boxing Аssociation of Belgrade full list of delegation. Please inform us in what city will you apply for Serbian visa. We kindly ask you to send us requests for visa assistance not later than 01st April 2021. REGISTRATION FORM: • Preliminary entries must be sent until 12th of March, 2021, • Final entries with arrival and departure details must be sent until 12th of April, 2021. • All entries for this Tournament must be sent to the Serbian Boxing Federation and Belgrade Boxing Association by: • Tel +381113771561 Fax: +381113162105 • By e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] We look forward to meeting You in Serbia. Božidar Tadić Tournament Director, President Boxing Association of Belgrade. Ivana Milošević Gen. Secretary Serbian Boxing Federation +381 11 40 38 073 Nenad Borovčanin President Serbian Boxing Federation Jovan Panić Tournament Coordinator Mob/Viber: + 381 63 514 880 + 381 65 8144 536 [email protected] COVID-19 PROTOCOL FOR TEAM DELEGATIONS All official members of Team Delegations, whether they are competitors or staff, international or local are obligated to: • Present, on arrival, an individual COVID-19 medical certificates (PCR test made within 48 hours before arrival) with a negative result. • Appoint a COVID-19 contact person from the official Team Delegation list, who will be present during the Tournament and will be in charge of any COVID-19 related issues for their Team Delegation. • Wear a mask at all times during the Tournament, with exceptions of: • boxers in training when it is not possible to wear it • participants during their meals only when seated at their dining table • Observe social distancing at all times (1,5 m), except for boxers during their bouts and during warming up with their coach. • Avoid entering hotel rooms of other participants under any circumstances. • Avoid any contact with individuals who are not on the training camp as workers, other athletes... • Submit to contactless temperature screening by the LOC and/or local health authorities at any time during the Tournament • Submit to COVID-19 testing at any time during the Tournament on request of LOC COVID-19 Managers and/or local health authorities • Follow all instructions of LOC COVID-19 Event Managers, including following isolation, quarantine, observation procedures and provision of detailed contact tracing in case of need • Timely report all COVID-19 protocol violations during the Event to EUBC/LOC COVID-19 Managers Hall Pinki, Belgrade, www.pinki-zemun.co.rs Hotel Jugoslavija***, Belgrade, hoteljugoslavija.rs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DANCING in the the West, China and Russia in the Western Balkans
    DARKDANCING IN THE The West, China and Russia in the Western Balkans By Dr. Valbona Zeneli, Marshall Center professor | Photos by AFP/Getty Images n the new era of great power competition, Since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dissolu- China and Russia challenge Western and trans- tion of Yugoslavia, which brought bloody conflict to Atlantic security and prosperity, not least in the Europe in the1990s, the political West — the United I Western Balkans. The region has shaped the States and the European Union — and its clear foreign history of modern Europe and has been a gateway policy toward the Western Balkans have been crucial between East and West for centuries. In recent years, throughout the process of stabilization, reconstruc- external players have amplified engagement and tion, state consolidation and, finally, NATO and EU influence in the region. The authoritarian external integration. For Western Balkan countries, accession to presence in the Western Balkans could be classified Euro-Atlantic institutions has been viewed internally and as “grafting” — countries such as Russia and Turkey externally as the main mechanism for security, stabil- with a long history of engagement in the region — ity and democracy in a troubled region. Albania and and “grifting” — countries such as China and the Croatia joined NATO in 2009, Montenegro in 2017, Gulf states that bring to bear a more commercial and North Macedonia signed its accession document to and transactional approach. become the 30th NATO member in March 2020. PER CONCORDIAM ILLUSTRATION Democratization has been the key feature of “Europeanization,” while the “carrot” of membership was used to motivate the political elites in the accession countries to adopt and implement important democratic structural reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgrade - Budapest - Ljubljana - Zagreb Sample Prospect
    NOVI SAD BEOGRAD Železnička 23a Kraljice Natalije 78 PRODAJA: PRODAJA: 021/422-324, 021/422-325 (fax) 011/3616-046 [email protected] [email protected] KOMERCIJALA: KOMERCIJALA 021/661-07-07 011/3616-047 [email protected] [email protected] FINANSIJE: [email protected] LICENCA: OTP 293/2010 od 17.02.2010. www.grandtours.rs BELGRADE - BUDAPEST - LJUBLJANA - ZAGREB SAMPLE PROSPECT 1st day – BELGRADE The group is landing in Serbia after which they get on the bus and head to the downtown Belgrade. Sightseeing of the Belgrade: National Theatre, House of National Assembly, Patriarchy of Serbian Orthodox Church etc. Upon request of the group, Tour of The Saint Sava Temple could be organized. The tour of Kalemegdan fortress, one of the biggest fortress that sits on the confluence of Danube and Sava rivers. Upon request of the group, Avala Tower visit could be organized, which offers a view of mountainous Serbia on one side and plain Serbia on the other. Departure for the hotel. Dinner. Overnight stay. 2nd day - BELGRADE - NOVI SAD – BELGRADE Breakfast. After the breakfast the group would travel to Novi Sad, consider by many as one of the most beautiful cities in Serbia. Touring the downtown's main streets (Zmaj Jovina & Danube street), Danube park, Petrovaradin Fortress. The trip would continue towards Sremski Karlovci, a beautiful historic place close to the city of Novi Sad. Great lunch/dinner option in Sremski Karlovci right next to the Danube river. After the dinner, the group would head back to the hotel in Belgrade.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergence of Myrobalan (Prunus Cerasifera Ehrh.) Types on the Territory of Serbia
    UDC 575: 634.22 Original scientific paper DIVERGENCE OF MYROBALAN (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. ) TYPES ON THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA Dragan NIKOLI Ć and Vera RAKONJAC Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia Nikoli ć D. and V. Rakonjac (2007): Divergence of myrobalan (Prunus cerasifera ehrh.) types on the territory of Serbia.. – Genetika, Vol. 39, No. 3, 333 - 342. Variability of some more prominent pomological characteristics was examined in three regions of Serbia (central, western, southern). In all the regions, significant variability of all studied characteristics was established. However, no specifics were manifested between regions, therefore, identical types emerge in all the regions. This is indicated by similar intervals of variation as well as similar mean values of characteristics per region. The obtained results lead to the conclusion that the entire territory of Serbia should be observed as a unique myrobalan population with highly expressed polymorphism of characteristics. To preserve genetic variability of myrobalan, collection is recommended for those types that were arranged into various groups and subgroups according to the results of cluster analysis. Key word: myrobalan, natural population, pomological characteristics, phenotypic variability ______________________________ Corresponding author: Dragan Nikoli ć, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia, e-mail: [email protected] 334 GENETIKA, Vol. 39, No. 3, 333 -342, 2007. INTRODUCTION The myrobalan or cherry plum ( Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) is native to southeastern Europe or southwestern Asia. Its seedlings are used for the most part as a rootstock for plum (W EINBERGER , 1975; E RBIL and S OYLU , 2002), but lesser for apricot (D IMITROVA and M ARINOV , 2002) and almond and peach (D UVAL et al ., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • When Diplomats Fail: Aostrian and Rossian Reporting from Belgrade, 1914
    WHEN DIPLOMATS FAIL: AOSTRIAN AND ROSSIAN REPORTING FROM BELGRADE, 1914 Barbara Jelavich The mountain of books written on the origins of the First World War have produced no agreement on the basic causes of this European tragedy. Their division of opinion reflects the situation that existed in June and July 1914, when the principal statesmen involved judged the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Habsburg throne, and its consequences from radically different perspectives. Their basic misunderstanding of the interests and viewpoints 'of the opposing sides contributed strongly to the initiation of hostilities. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of diplomatic reporting, particularly in the century before 1914 when ambassadors were men of influence and when their dispatches were read by those who made the final decisions in foreign policy. European diplomats often held strong opinions and were sometimes influenced by passions and. prejudices, but nevertheless throughout the century their activities contributed to assuring that this period would, with obvious exceptions, be an era of peace in continental affairs. In major crises the crucial decisions are always made by a very limited number of people no matter what the political system. Usually a head of state -- whether king, emperor, dictator, or president, together with those whom he chooses to consult, or a strong political leader with his advisers-­ -decides on the course of action. Obviously, in times of international tension these men need accurate information not only from their military staffs on the state of their and their opponent's armed forces and the strategic position of the country, but also expert reporting from their representatives abroad on the exact issues at stake and the attitudes of the other governments, including their immediate concerns and their historical background.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro
    ATTACKS ON JUSTICE – SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Highlights Serbia and Montenegro (the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) entered the process of democratic transition, the creation of a system based on the rule of law, much later than other former socialist countries. On 4 February 2003 the new state union of Serbia and Montenegro was proclaimed. Under the Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, there is only one instance of Serbia and Montenegro having a common judiciary – the Court of Serbia and Montenegro. Otherwise, each state – the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro – has its own internal courts system. A set of important judicial reforms came into force on 1 March 2002 in the Republic of Serbia and in July 2002 amendments to these laws were made that violate the principle of separation of powers and the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. In Montenegro, several laws relating to the judiciary were passed or amended during 2003. On 19 March 2003, the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia dismissed 35 judges from office, including seven Supreme Court judges, amid accusations that the judiciary had failed to take tougher measures in dealing with remnants of the former regime as well as in prosecuting organized crime. The legal system in Serbia and Montenegro is still characterized by a number of contradictory and inconsistent regulations, resulting in legal insecurity. BACKGROUND On March 2002 officials of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro signed a procedural agreement for the restructuring of relations between both states in Belgrade, in the presence of the high representative of the EU,.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Market Outlook – 2018
    Residential Market Outlook Belgrade | Jan 2018 Regulated by RICS Regulated by RICS Residential Market Outlook | Jan 2018 | LeRoy Realty Consultants | 1 Serbia’s overall economy health has been reinforced further in 2017, which lifted up the GDP & Construction Industry Growth country’s credit rating from BB- to BB¹, with a 5% stable outlook in December 2017. The outlook 4.0% for this year shows growth accelerating 4% 2.8% 3% 2.8% 2.2% The GDP growth of 1.8% in 2017 was lower than projected, 2% 1.8%* but its structure points toward underlying changes that will 1% shape the economic expansion in the coming years. The 0.8% growth is primarily driven by the increased investment, 0% -0.7% private consumption, exports and FDI. On the other hand, 2014 2015 2016 2017 the growth of the construction industry outperforms that of -1% the local economy in the last 3 years, with positive future -1.8% -2% prospects. Construction industry growth GDP *estimate FDI inflow in 2017 stood at EUR 2.3 billion, which is up by Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 37.5% y-o-y thus exceeding the projection for 2017. The Central Bank has decided to cautiously loosen monetary Unemployment & Salaries policy, to support a boost in domestic economic activity, and 20% 6% decreased its key policy rate at a historic low of 3.5% on 18% Salary growth rate October 2017, which contributed to the decline in the EUR- 16% 4% indexed lending. 14% 3.7% 3.9% 12% 10% 1.4% 2% 8% Elevated levels of business and 6% 0% 4% -0.2% consumer sentiment Unemployment rate 2% 0% -2% Labor market conditions have continued to improve in 2017, 2014 2015 2016 2017 even faster than previously expected, with the Unemployment Salary growth unemployment rate falling to 12.9% in the third quarter of Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 2017, coupled with two consecutive years of wage growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bri in Europe and the Budapest-Belgrade Railway Link
    Briefing Paper, 10/2019 THE BRI IN EUROPE AND THE BUDAPEST-BELGRADE RAILWAY LINK Flora Rencz Junior Researcher, EIAS October 2019 Abstract Increasing Chinese influence in Europe has been a growing source of anxiety in Brussels in recent years. This paper seeks to better understand these exacerbated fears through the case of the Budapest-Belgrade railway link refurbishment. The project is part of the 17+1 Cooperation and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It had been announced in 2013 but was stalled on the Hungarian side until 2019 due to EU tender regulations. This paper provides an overview of the Budapest-Belgrade case’s timeline and details. It also analyses the challenges arising during the execution of the project, particularly focusing on political concerns from Brussels, feasibility issues, and the reception of the refurbishment by the Hungarian public. The paper also sheds light on how the project progressed differently on the Hungarian side as it did on the Serbian side as a non-EU member, due to the EU’s intervention. The railway link is a great case study to gain a better understanding of the BRI and the implications of China’s growing influence as a global actor for the EU and its neighbours. Briefing papers published by the European Institute for Asian Studies are summaries of facts which are related to a certain issue and often include a proposed course of action. This paper expresses the views of the author(s) and not of the European Institute for Asian Studies Introduction In November 2013, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, Serbian Prime Minister Ivica Dačić, and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán announced plans to modernise the railway link between Budapest and Belgrade.1 The project was retrospectively labelled part of China’s multilateral cooperation with the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, the so-called 17+1 Cooperation (since Greece joined in 2019),2 hence making it a Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) project.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Again: International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina1
    Never again: 1 International intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina July 2017 David Harland2 1 This study is one of a series commissioned as part of an ongoing UK Government Stabilisation Unit project relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project is exploring how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. This is a 'working paper' and the views contained within do not necessarily represent those of HMG. 2 Dr David Harland is Executive Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. He served as a witness for the Prosecution at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the cases of The Prosecutor versus Slobodan Milošević, The Prosecutor versus Radovan Karadžić, The Prosecutor versus Ratko Mladić, and others. Executive summary The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina was the most violent of the conflicts which accompanied the break- up of Yugoslavia, and this paper explores international engagement with that war, including the process that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Sarajevo and Srebrenica remain iconic symbols of international failure to prevent and end violent conflict, even in a small country in Europe. They are seen as monuments to the "humiliation" of Europe and the UN and the
    [Show full text]
  • China's Rise As a Geoeconomic Influencer: Four European
    ASIA PROGRAM CHINA’S RISE AS A GEOECONOMIC INFLUENCER: FOUR EUROPEAN CASE STUDIES BY PHILIPPE LE CORRE NON-RESIDENT SENIOR FELLOW IN THE EUROPE AND ASIA PROGRAMS, CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE NOVEMBER 2018 ASIA FOCUS #93 ASIA FOCUS #93 – ASIA PROGRAM / November 2018 ver the past decade, China has become central to the world economy. Building on its economic successes, it is becoming increasingly central in world politics. O China is also now more ambitious, aiming to establish itself as a regional as well as a global power. In his October 2017 report to the Chinese Communist Party’s 19th Congress, President Xi Jinping stated that by 2050, China will have “become a global leader in terms of composite national strength and international influence.”1 Despite a growing internal debate about the country’s international positioning in the context of taking a confrontational tone with the United States, Xi believes he has the power to realize these ambitions. In June 2018, he chaired an important foreign policy meeting in Beijing, which reaffirmed the notions of a foreign policy with Chinese characteristics,2 “diplomacy of socialism with Chinese characteristics,”3 and redefined the concept of a “global community of common destiny.”4 China’s rise has been driven by economic development, starting with the launch almost exactly forty years ago of Deng Xiaoping’s Open-Door policy, which made China the economicOn the world powerhouse stage, China it is hastoday―not become just a strong domestically, player in but such in mostinstitutions parts of as the the world. United Nations and the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia (Srbija), Montenegro (Crna Gora) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna I Hercegovina)
    Serbia (Srbija), Montenegro (Crna Gora) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna i Hercegovina) Recent history Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH) were all (along with Croatia and FYR Macedonia) formed as a result of the break-up of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. BIH declared its independence from Yugoslavia in 1992, following a referendum. This break-up sparked conflict among the three large ethnic groups within the federation. Bosniaks and Croats generally favoured independence, whereas Bosnian Serbs, supported by the Serbian government, wished for a union with Serbia. Further conflict later erupted between the Croat statelet of Herzog-Bosnia and the Bosniaks. The wars lasted until the intervention of NATO and the signing of the Dayton Accords in 1995, by which time an estimated 100,000 people had been killed, many in acts of ethnic cleansing. Under the Dayton Accords, BIH was administratively decentralised and divided into two entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. Central government is consociational, with three rotating Presidents and set numbers of seats in both Houses of the Parliamentary Assembly for Croats, Bosniaks and Serbs. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia,How Serbia does did maintaina General a federation Election with Montenegro. actually However, work? this gradually evolved into a looser relationship, and Montenegrins narrowly voted for independence from Serbia in May 2006. Montenegro The UK is a liberal democracy. This means that we democratically elect politicians, who is now recognised as a separate nation by both Serbia and the EU. represent our interests. It also involves that individual rights are protected. Much more problematic has been Serbia’s relationship with Kosovo, which has a majority (90%) ethnic Albanian population.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro
    Serbia and Montenegro Main objectives Serbia and Montenegro • Provide legal assistance and encourage Serbia and Montenegro (SCG) to adopt a law on refugees, and create a national asylum system, including fair and effi cient Refugee Status Determination (RSD) procedures; • Phase out assistance to post-Dayton refugees by ensuring their inclusion in bilateral and government- sponsored development programmes, with continued assistance only for the most vulnerable; and • Facilitate the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) to Kosovo where possible and continue to as- sist the most vulnerable in their situation of displace- ment. Kosovo • Contribute towards the creation of conditions which will prevent further displacement of minorities in Kosovo; facilitate the voluntary return of minority IDPs and refu- gees to their places of origin and help to promote their subsequent long-term reintegration; • Identify and facilitate the attainment of durable solu- to refugees and IDPs. Furthermore, refugees and IDPs tions for refugees from Croatia and Bosnia and Her- are now included in the World Bank’s Poverty Reduction zegovina (BiH). Strategy Paper processes. A large number of collective centres have been closed and the residents assisted in fi nding alternative housing. Working environment Recent developments Planning figures: Serbia and Montenegro Serbia and Montenegro Population Jan. 2004 Dec. 2004 The new State Union of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (refugees) 89,950 40,000 Montenegro (SCG) was established Croatia (refugees) 180,000 70,000 in February 2003. Upon accession IDPs 220,000 200,000 to the Council of Europe in April Mandate refugees and asylum-seekers 280 6,000 2003, SCG committed itself to the Other refugees 50 20 enactment of national legislation Returnee IDPs 2,000 2,000 compliant with international law Total 492,280 318,020 and standards, including refugee legislation, but, at the time of writing, Planning figures: Kosovo basic issues of institutional compe- Population Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management for Inland Navigation on the Danube
    WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR INLAND NAVIGATION ON THE DANUBE Title of Report: Status Report National Frame- work Serbia Work Package 3: Elaborating Ship Waste Management Concepts Activity 3.1: Defining a Common Frame Work Concept Output No: 3.9 Work Package Leader/ Organisation: Dr. Ernö Pal, KTI Activity Leader/ Organisation: Dr. Ernö Pal, KTI Author/Organisation: Maja Jovanovic Author/Organisation: Dusko Isakovic Author/Organisation: Ivan Mitrovic Preparation of Document: October 2009 Version: 01 – Draft version TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................4 (I) GENERAL INFORMATION.............................................................................................................5 (I‐1) INTRODUCTION TO COUNTRY ......................................................................................................5 (I‐2) LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHY........................................................................................................6 (I‐3) INTRODUCTION TO RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES ..........................................................................8 (I‐3‐1) Highest Governmental Authorities in charge of Inland Navigation, Water Management, and Environment Protection...........................................................................................................8 (I‐3‐2) Other Governmental Authorities responsible of Inland Navigation, Water Management, and Environment Protection...........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]