<<

and

Main objectives

Serbia and Montenegro • Provide legal assistance and encourage (SCG) to adopt a law on , and create a national asylum system, including fair and effi cient Status Determination (RSD) procedures; • Phase out assistance to post-Dayton refugees by ensuring their inclusion in bilateral and government- sponsored development programmes, with continued assistance only for the most vulnerable; and • Facilitate the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) to where possible and continue to as- sist the most vulnerable in their situation of displace- ment. Kosovo • Contribute towards the creation of conditions which will prevent further displacement of minorities in Kosovo; facilitate the of minority IDPs and refu- gees to their places of origin and help to promote their subsequent long-term reintegration; • Identify and facilitate the attainment of durable solu- to refugees and IDPs. Furthermore, refugees and IDPs tions for refugees from and and Her- are now included in the Bank’s Poverty Reduction zegovina (BiH). Strategy Paper processes. A large number of collective centres have been closed and the residents assisted in fi nding alternative housing. Working environment Recent developments Planning figures: Serbia and Montenegro

Serbia and Montenegro Population Jan. 2004 Dec. 2004 The new State Union of Serbia and Bosnia and (refugees) 89,950 40,000 Montenegro (SCG) was established Croatia (refugees) 180,000 70,000 in 2003. Upon accession IDPs 220,000 200,000 to the Council of in Mandate refugees and asylum-seekers 280 6,000 2003, SCG committed itself to the Other refugees 50 20 enactment of national legislation Returnee IDPs 2,000 2,000 compliant with international law Total 492,280 318,020 and standards, including refugee legislation, but, at the time of writing, Planning figures: Kosovo basic issues of institutional compe- Population Jan. 2004 Dec. 2004 tence had yet to be resolved. The /Croatia (refugees) 450 400 National Strategy for resolving the FYR (refugees) 1,000 500 problems of refugees and IDPs is IDPs 2,000 1,000 an important operational document Minority residents-at-risk 85,000 80,000 in Serbia, while the Government of Minority returnees (31 Dec. 2003) 2,800 - Montenegro is presently drafting Minority returnees (31 Dec. 2004) - 5,000 its own strategy for ensuring the Total 91,250 86,900 integration into national develop- Total requirements: USD 27,372,845 ment programmes of issues related

230 UNHCR Global Appeal 2004 Kosovo and promote solutions for the holders of tenancy rights. While UNMIK retains many powers, particularly regarding Resettlement will target the most vulnerable segments the protection of minority communities, the Provisional of the refugee population. UNHCR will maintain activities Institution of Self-Governance (PISG) been granted on behalf of IDPs from Kosovo with an increased focus substantial legislative and authority, the full impact on durable solutions, and will supervise and co-ordinate of which will be felt in 2004. The lack of a fi nal political the process of return of IDPs where feasible. UNHCR will status will continue to strain relations between majority continue to advocate the rights of IDPs in the place of and minority communities, and further delay minority displacement and to provide material, legal and social return. The recent establishment of the PISG structures assistance, with particular focus on the specifi c needs of and their commitment to the benchmark process (a set of Roma IDPs. eight standards, three of which have direct relevance to minority communities: , Returns and Kosovo Property) is expected to improve inter-ethnic relations and UNHCR will monitor the conditions of minorities in Kosovo integration prospects. Unfortunately, forced minority returns in close co-operation with other human rights and hu- from outside the region are likely to continue, despite manitarian agencies. UNHCR will also continue to provide security concerns for many minority communities. accurate and timely information to IDPs and refugees, and facilitate visits to places of origin in preparation for return. Constraints The main focus will be to help resolve the obstacles pre- venting return and pursue durable solutions. In addition Serbia and Montenegro to voluntary , solutions may be found through The new does not designate a central organ local settlement, in co-operation with UNMIK and PISG. to take charge of refugee issues. This in itself constitutes a impediment to the process of building the Assistance institution of asylum. There are also ambiguities in the division of competencies at the federal and republican Serbia and Montenegro levels, and between the two . Voluntary return The most vulnerable refugees will receive basic WFP food to Croatia is still affected by a number of constraints items for the fi rst three months. With the exception of (e.g. property repossession procedures, reconstruction, sanitary materials for women, there will be no distribution tenancy rights and lack of economic opportunities). of non-food items. Small grants will be provided at a limi- ted scale where refugees or IDPs demonstrate an urgent Kosovo need. Older, sick and disabled refugees and IDPs will be The return of minorities to Kosovo is largely contingent housed in specialised institutions. Community services on the political relations between the Union of Serbia and activities will target the most vulnerable children, women, Montenegro authorities and the PISG, which must now and older refugees and IDPs. The Ministries of Social make demonstrable progress in the benchmark process. Affairs/Social Welfare will be supported to care for the Security remains problematic in Kosovo. most vulnerable among the refugee and IDP population. UNHCR will advocate increased donor support for areas hosting large populations of refugees and IDPs. UNHCR Strategy will also promote the productive capacity of refugees and IDPs, with a special focus on the empowerment of Protection and solutions women. UNHCR will provide household items and building materials to help refugees move out of collective centres, Serbia and Montenegro and provide transport for the most vulnerable refugees UNHCR will continue to identify durable solutions and returning to BiH and Croatia.

build the capacity of local institutions and national NGOs. Serbia and Montenegro UNHCR will assist the Government to develop asylum institu- Kosovo tions and to establish a reception centre. UNHCR will UNHCR’s activities will focus on the provision of protection also nurture partnerships on asylum issues, in particular and targeted assistance (including income generation with the European institutions, through the Regional projects) to minority returnees and to extremely vulnerable Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development minority communities throughout Kosovo, with a view to and Stabilisation (CARDS) Programme, and the promotion supporting the sustainable reintegration of returnees and of the Acquis Communautaires (the established EU preventing further displacement. UNHCR will continue approaches to asylum issues). For refugees from former to advocate greater minority access to essential public , UNHCR will monitor, in countries of origin, the services. Legal advice and assistance will be provided to progress of repossession and reconstruction activities minority returnees. Particular emphasis will be placed on

UNHCR Global Appeal 2004 231 Serbia and Montenegro

Many refugees work hard at becoming self-suffi cient. Here, a Bosnian refugee woman, who lives in a refugee centre in , is training to be a chef. UNHCR / V. Petkovic

inter-ethnic dialogue and tolerance building to help create refugees are protected against refoulement, are granted conditions conducive to the return of minorities. UNHCR access to a fair and effi cient RSD process and can will also continue to assist refugees and IDPs from the achieve social and economic integration in SCG. region by identifying durable solutions, primarily voluntary repatriation and local integration. Kosovo UNHCR will focus on facilitating voluntary returns to Desired impact ensure that they take place in a safe and dignifi ed manner. UNHCR will promote inter-ethnic dialogue be- Serbia and Montenegro tween minority refugees, IDPs and returnees and receiving UNHCR will hand over more responsibilities to the Govern- or neighbouring communities. Additional efforts will be ment and local institutions, ensuring that refugees and made to support active PISG participation in inter-ethnic IDPs (particularly Roma) are included in development pro- dialogue. UNHCR will continue to support the UNMIK grammes and the needy in social welfare programmes. Offi ce for Returns and Communities in the establishment UNHCR aims to build the institution of asylum, so that of effective inter-agency co-ordination mechanisms.

232 UNHCR Global Appeal 2004 Organisation and implementation Partners: Serbia and Montenegro Management structure Government agencies Federal Ministry of Human and Minority Rights Serbia and Montenegro (Serbia and Montenegro) At the beginning of 2004, UNHCR will have 90 posts (13 Ministry of Health (Montenegro) international and 77 national), apportioned between the Ministry of Interior (Montenegro) branch offi ce, two fi eld offi ces ( and Novi- Ministry of Interior (Serbia) Sad) and a sub-offi ce in Montenegro. The fi eld offi ce in Ministry of Social Affairs (Serbia) NoviSad will be closed in December 2004, resulting in the Ministry of Social Welfare (Montenegro) discontinuation of 13 posts at the national level. Commissioner for Displaced Persons (Montenegro) Commissioner for Refugees (Serbia) Kosovo Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation UNHCR Kosovo will be headed by a Chief of Mission and (Serbia and Montenegro) will comprise 82 staff (18 international and 64 national) and will retain its presence in , Mitrovica, Pec and NGOs Gjiliane regions. American Refugee Committee (Montenegro) AMITY (Serbia) Co-ordination Community Development Centre (Montenegro) Danish Refugee Council (Serbia/Montenegro) Serbia and Montenegro Hi Neighbour (Serbia) UNHCR’s main government counterparts are the Serbian Humanitarian Centre for Integration and Tolerance (Serbia) Commissioner for Refugees and the Montenegrin Com- International Orthodox Christian Charities (Serbia) missioner for Displaced, the Ministries of the Interior of INTERSOS (Serbia and Montenegro) the two Republics and the Federal Ministry for Human and Italian Consortium of Solidarity (Serbia) Minority Rights. The Ministry of Social Affairs MICROFINS (Serbia) the needs of the most vulnerable refugees and IDPs. On Norwegian Refugee Council (Serbia) IDP issues, UNHCR works closely with ICRC, UNMIK and Serbian Democratic Forum (Serbia) the Co-ordination Centre for Kosovo and . Others Kosovo Red Cross of Montenegro (Montenegro) UNMIK will continue to be UNHCR’s main counterpart, Red Cross of Serbia (Serbia) in particular the Offi ce of Returns and Communities, as UNV well as the PISG and the . UNHCR regularly meets with other United agencies and international Partners: Kosovo organisations (EC, OSCE, KFOR), NGOs implementing NGOs return projects and donors’ representatives. American Refugee Committee Council for the Defence of Human Rights and Freedom Budget (USD) Danish Refugee Council GOAL Activities and services Annual Programme International Catholic Migration Commission Protection, monitoring and co-ordination 8,096,346 Kosovo Womens’ Initiative Community services 3,532,076 Malteser Hilfsdienst Domestic needs 1,663,114 – Scotland Education 120,000 Society

Food 75,044 Serbia and Montenegro Norwegian Church Aid Health 515,000 Norwegian Refugee Council Income generation 406,500 Legal assistance 3,435,875 Others Operational support (to agencies) 2,089,135 OSCE Sanitation 20,000 UNMIK Shelter / other infrastructure 3,965,392 UNV Transport / logistics 1,479,164 Total Operations 25,397,646 Programme support 1,975,199 Total 27,372,845

UNHCR Global Appeal 2004 233