Benchmark 3: Evaluation of Alternatives with Respect to Existing Conditions August 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benchmark 3: Evaluation of Alternatives with Respect to Existing Conditions August 2015 Salton Sea Funding and Feasibility Action Plan Benchmark 3: Evaluation of Alternatives With Respect to Existing Conditions August 2015 Prepared by: Prepared for: This document is prepared as a living document for public review and comment. Comments may be provided to: Salton Sea Authority 82995 Hwy 111, Suite 200 Indio, CA 92201 Email: [email protected] Comments will be reviewed and incorporated as appropriate. If substantive comments are received, a revised document may be produced and distributed. Preferred citation: Salton Sea Authority (2015). Salton Sea Funding and Feasibility Action Plan Benchmark 3 Report: Evaluation of Alternatives With Respect to Existing Conditions, August Report. Revision Record Revisions to this document will be reviewed and approved through the same level of authority as the original document. All changes to the Benchmark 3 Report must be authorized by the Principal in Charge. Date Version Changes January Working Posted on Salton Sea Authority website. 2015 Draft Included changes from draft review by Salton Sea TCT. June 2015 First Updated hydrology section and inflow Complete projections including Figures 48-52, along with Document editorial revisions. August Revision 1 Added this Revision Record. Corrected title of 2015 California Department of Fish and Wildlife and other minor editorial revisions. Updated discussion of historical flows from 2003-present. Tetra Tech, Inc. i August 2015 Executive Summary This report presents a review of Salton Sea restoration alternatives and their components and determine how well they would perform under current and future inflows. Alternatives are considered with respect to existing hydrologic conditions at the Sea, as of 2014, and projected future hydrology. It is intended to inform those who are engaged in planning the restoration and management of the Sea. Data Review and Compilation The majority of the historical water quality data for the New and Alamo Rivers came from the Bureau of Reclamation and the State Water Resources Control Board’s CEDEN website. Peer-reviewed research pertaining to hydrology and water quality in the Salton Sea was included in the data review. Water quality data from the past decade, with a focus on salinity, nutrients, selenium, temperature, dissolved oxygen, transparency, total suspended solids and coliforms, was presented in detail in the Benchmark 2 document and some key findings are summarized in Section 2 of this document. Elevation continues to drop as inflows decrease, causing salinity to rise. Excess nutrients, selenium and oxygen depletion continue to be a problem in the Sea. Full Sea Restoration Investigations and Alternatives Full Sea restoration alternatives from previous investigations are summarized in Section 3.0. Full Sea restoration alternatives include the Authority’s Preferred Restoration Plan (2006), the California Department of Water Resources Alternatives (2007), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) Alternatives (2007) and others. In 2003, “the state legislature directed the State of California to ‘undertake the restoration of the Salton Sea ecosystem and the permanent protection of the wildlife dependent on that ecosystem’” (Salton Sea Update). According to the Department of Water Resources their objective is focused on “several key elements: protecting fish; and wildlife, maintaining ecosystem benefits, minimizing air quality impacts, and improving water quality” (Salton Sea Update). Through the departments of Fish and Wildlife (previously Fish and Game) and Water Resources, the state endeavored to bring together all contributing stakeholders involved in the project. After considering a set of eight alternatives, a Preferred Alternative was outlined in detail in 2007. Eight alternatives were evaluated in the Draft PEIR. The Preferred Alternative takes aspects from many of the alternatives evaluated. The Preferred Tetra Tech, Inc. i August 2015 Salton Sea Funding and Feasibility Action Plan _Executive Summary Evaluation of Alternatives With Respect to Existing Conditions Alternative includes Saline Habitat Complex in the northern and southern seabed, a Marine Sea that extends around the northern shoreline from San Felipe Creek to Bombay Beach in a “horseshoe” shape, Air Quality Management facilities to reduce particulate emissions from the exposed playa, brine sink for discharge of salts, Sedimentation/Distribution facilities, and Early Start Habitat to provide habitat prior to construction of the habitat components. The Preferred Alternative also could be configured to accommodate future geothermal development. In 2006, the Salton Sea Authority (The Authority) formulated a plan to provide a restored Sea along the current shoreline along with the development of habitat areas that could stimulate the development and improve the economic conditions for the Tribe and Imperial and Riverside counties. Their plan involves five essential components: in-Sea barrier and circulation channels, water treatment facilities, habitat enhancement features, Colorado River water storage, and park; open space; and wildlife areas. The Bureau of Reclamation, in September 2007, responded to the Water Supply Reliability and Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law (P.L.) 108- 361) by performing a feasibility study to determine a preferred alternative action for restoring the Salton Sea. The primary objective was to identify methods to restore the Sea’s ecosystem and provide permanent protection of the wildlife sustained on that ecosystem. Two secondary objectives of Reclamation’s study were to promote human activities supported by the Sea, and to manage air quality. To accomplish their objectives Reclamation presented six different alternatives: 1. Mid-Sea Dam with North Marine Lake 2. Mid-Sea Barrier with South Marine Lake 3. Concentric Lakes 4. North-Sea Dam with Marine Lake 5. Habitat Without Marine Lake 6. No Project Evaluating the alternatives involved considering a series of risks: selenium risks to fish-eating birds, selenium risks to invertebrate-eating birds, hydrodynamic/stratification risks, eutrophication risks, fishery sustainability risks, and future inflow risks. Due to a “lack of data” and irresolvable issues of “hydrologic and biologic uncertainties” none of the alternatives presented in the 2007 Executive Summary Report were recommended. Other earlier investigations are included in this report, including Pacific Institute’s Proposal (2001), US Filter Corporation Proposal (2002). Previously proposed ideas are revisited, including multiple dike proposals, central August 2015 ii Salton Sea Authority Salton Sea Funding and Feasibility Action Plan Evaluation of Alternatives With Respect to Existing Conditions Executive Summary_ causeway option, pipelines and canals, and a list of ideas from the Authority’s early screening process. Other Restoration Concepts Other restoration concepts, including partial solutions are discussed in Section 4.0. A number of concepts were developed in response to the Salton Sea Reclamation Act and subsequently included in the Authority’s “Final Preferred Project Report” Published in July 2004. These include early planning concepts such as on-land solar ponds, enhanced evaporation systems (EES), desalination, and in-Sea solar evaporation ponds. Options designed to be implemented alongside desalination to achieve restoration goals include wildlife disease control, created wetlands, recreation and public information, continuing work on eutrophication assessment and control measures, shoreline cleanup and fishery management. Common components for restoration include determining replacement water sources such as flood flows, the Central Arizona Salinity Interceptor (CASI), the plan for desalting the Colorado River Aqueduct proposed by the City of Brawley, CA, and groundwater sources. Species Conservation Habitat (SCH) Currently, the largest active restoration effort at the Salton Sea is the State’s Species Conservation Habitat (SCH) Project. The SCH is a piscivorous bird habitat restoration project with multiple alternatives. The goals of the project are to develop a range of aquatic habitats that will support fish and wildlife species dependent on the Salton Sea; and to develop and refine information needed to successfully manage the SCH Project habitat through an adaptive management process. Six alternatives plus a “No Action” alternative are discussed in Section 5.0. Components of the various alternatives are discussed. Evaluation of Alternatives under Projected Inflows Hydrology data including inflow projections by water districts in the region were compiled and existing Salton Sea hydrological models were updated with existing conditions. Inflow projections and the supporting hydrologic data are discussed in Section 6.0. The latest inflow projections are based on the most current information regarding the Quantification Settlement Agreement, river flows, other project water requirements in the region, agricultural discharge, evaporation and climate change. Water use was estimated for each alternative and for currently planned or ongoing restoration projects. Projections include the potential for new sources and sinks of Salton Sea water including the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) Pipeline, a potential brackish line from Tucson, Arizona being considered by Reclamation, a potential brackish line for the construction of a water Tetra Tech, Inc. iii August 2015 Salton Sea Funding and Feasibility Action Plan _Executive Summary Evaluation of Alternatives With Respect to Existing
Recommended publications
  • Consequences of Drying Lake Systems Around the World
    Consequences of Drying Lake Systems around the World Prepared for: State of Utah Great Salt Lake Advisory Council Prepared by: AECOM February 15, 2019 Consequences of Drying Lake Systems around the World Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 13 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................. 13 III. APPROACH ............................................................................. 16 IV. CASE STUDIES OF DRYING LAKE SYSTEMS ...................... 17 1. LAKE URMIA ..................................................................................................... 17 a) Overview of Lake Characteristics .................................................................... 18 b) Economic Consequences ............................................................................... 19 c) Social Consequences ..................................................................................... 20 d) Environmental Consequences ........................................................................ 21 e) Relevance to Great Salt Lake ......................................................................... 21 2. ARAL SEA ........................................................................................................ 22 a) Overview of Lake Characteristics .................................................................... 22 b) Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Lled Basins of the Red
    Deep-Sea Research I 46 (1999) 1779}1792 Hydrographic changes during 20 years in the brine-"lled basins of the Red Sea Pierre Anschutz! *,GeH rard Blanc!, Fabienne Chatin", Magali Geiller", Marie-Claire Pierret" !De& partement de Ge& ologie et Oce&anographie (D.G.O.), Universite& Bordeaux 1, CNRS UMR 5805, 33405 Talence Cedex, France "Centre de Ge& ochimie de la Surface, Institut de Ge&ologie, Universite& Louis Pasteur, CNRS UMR 7517, 67084, Strasbourg, France Received 16 June 1998; accepted 8 February 1999 Abstract Many of the deep basins "lled by hot brines in the Red Sea have not been investigated since their discovery in the early 1970s. Twenty years later, in September 1992, six of these deeps were revisited. The temperature and salinity of the Suakin, Port Sudan, Chain B, and Nereus deeps ranged from 23.25 to 44.603C and from 144 to 270&. These values were approximately the same in 1972, indicating that the budget of heat and salt was quite balanced. We measured strong gradients of properties in the transition zone between brines and overlying seawater. The contribution of salinity to the density gradient was more than one order of magnitude higher than the opposite contribution of temperature across the seawater}brine interface. Therefore the interface was extemely stable, and the transfer of properties across it was considered to be controlled mostly by molecular di!usion. We calculate that the di!usional transport of salt from the brines to seawater cannot a!ect signi"cantly the salinity of the brines over a 20 year period, which agrees with the observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Storage
    277 6 Ocean storage Coordinating Lead Authors Ken Caldeira (United States), Makoto Akai (Japan) Lead Authors Peter Brewer (United States), Baixin Chen (China), Peter Haugan (Norway), Toru Iwama (Japan), Paul Johnston (United Kingdom), Haroon Kheshgi (United States), Qingquan Li (China), Takashi Ohsumi (Japan), Hans Pörtner (Germany), Chris Sabine (United States), Yoshihisa Shirayama (Japan), Jolyon Thomson (United Kingdom) Contributing Authors Jim Barry (United States), Lara Hansen (United States) Review Editors Brad De Young (Canada), Fortunat Joos (Switzerland) 278 IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 279 6.7 Environmental impacts, risks, and risk management 298 6.1 Introduction and background 279 6.7.1 Introduction to biological impacts and risk 298 6.1.1 Intentional storage of CO2 in the ocean 279 6.7.2 Physiological effects of CO2 301 6.1.2 Relevant background in physical and chemical 6.7.3 From physiological mechanisms to ecosystems 305 oceanography 281 6.7.4 Biological consequences for water column release scenarios 306 6.2 Approaches to release CO2 into the ocean 282 6.7.5 Biological consequences associated with CO2 6.2.1 Approaches to releasing CO2 that has been captured, lakes 307 compressed, and transported into the ocean 282 6.7.6 Contaminants in CO2 streams 307 6.2.2 CO2 storage by dissolution of carbonate minerals 290 6.7.7 Risk management 307 6.2.3 Other ocean storage approaches 291 6.7.8 Social aspects; public and stakeholder perception 307 6.3 Capacity and fractions retained
    [Show full text]
  • Okeanos Explorer Rov Dive Summary
    OKEANOS EXPLORER ROV DIVE SUMMARY Site Name GB907 Expedition Kelley Elliott/ Coordinator/ Brian Bingham ROV Lead Stephanie Farrington (Biology) Science Team Leads Jamie Austin (Geology) General Area Gulf of Mexico Descriptor Cruise Season Leg Dive Number ROV Dive Name EX1402 3 DIVE02 ROV: Deep Discoverer Equipment Deployed Camera Platform: Seirios CTD Depth Altitude Scanning Sonar USBL Position Heading ROV Measurements Pitch Roll HD Camera 1 HD Camera 2 Low Res Cam 1 Low Res Cam 2 Low Res Cam 3 Low Res Cam 4 Low Res Cam 2 Equipment N/A Malfunctions Dive Summary: EX1402L3_DIVE02 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ In Water at: 2014-04-13T13:45:38.439000 27°, 05.899' N ; 092°, 37.310' W Out Water at: 2014-04-13T19:12:34.841000 27°, 05.096' N ; 092°, 36.588' W ROV Dive Summary Off Bottom at: 2014-04-13T18:24:04.035000 (From processed ROV 27°, 05.455' N ; 092°, 36.956' W data) On Bottom at: 2014-04-13T14:31:16.507000 27°, 05.519' N ; 092°, 37.099' W Dive duration: 5:26:56 Bottom Time: 3:52:47 Max. depth: 1266.7 m Special Notes Primary Jamie Austin, EX, UT Austin, [email protected] Stephanie Farrington, EX, HBOI/FAU, [email protected] Andrea Quattrini, Temple, Temple, [email protected] Scientists Involved Bernie Ball, Duke, Duke, [email protected] (please provide name / Brian Kinlan, NOAA NMFS, [email protected] location / affiliation / email) Carolyn Ruppel, Woods Hole, USGS, [email protected] Erik Cordes, Temple, Temple, [email protected] Larry Mayer, UNH, UNH CCOM, [email protected] Michael Vecchione,
    [Show full text]
  • A Phytoremediation Pilot Project at the LCP Chemicals
    Case Study LCP Chemicals Site Phytoremediation Pilot Project Shea Jones Remedial Project Manager EPA Region 4 Outline of Presentation z Background Information z Groundwater Quality z Groundwater Seeps z Project Goal z Implementation of Project z Community and Agency Concerns z Current Status z Next Steps z Lessons Learned Background Information z 550-acre site z Former oil refinery, paint manufacturing co., power plant, and chlor-alkali facility operated from 1919- 1994 z Significant PRP-led removal actions in 1999 ($60 million) z Soil and sediment contaminated with lead, mercury, and PCBs z Fish advisories z Currently in RI/FS phase Groundwater Quality z Multiple rounds of horizontal and vertical well data z Hg levels as high as 330 ppb and Pb as high as 120 ppb z Hg found below a sandstone layer z Caustic Brine Pool below old cell buildings z Removal Action Groundwater Seeps z During conditions of high water table, seepage of groundwater occurs along portions of the shoreline that separates the upland soils from the tidal marsh z Dark brown color z Some COCs present at elevated levels (74 ppb Hg and 60 ppb Pb) Project Goal z To locally suppress the groundwater table (0.9 ft) and therefore, prevent the seeps from recontaminating the marsh z Secondary Goals – Create a root zone that will degrade organic contaminants through microbial degradation – Stabilize metals and take them up (lower mobility and availability) z Insert first scanned picture showing seep location z Insert scanned pics showing conceptual site model Plant Selection z List of potentially applicable plants was examined z List narrowed based on tolerance to site conditions (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Algae Flora of Graduation Towers in the Town of Ciechocinek
    Ecological Questions 14/2011: 25 – 29 DOI: 10.2478/v10090-011-0007-6 Algae flora of graduation towers in the town of Ciechocinek Marta Luścińska, Malwina Gadziemska Department of Plant Ecology and Nature Protection Nicolaus Copernicus University, Gagarina 9, 87–100 Toruń e-mail: [email protected] Summary. The research was focused on algae occurring on wooden constructions of three graduation towers, which are the main ele- ments of historical salt production technology, located in the health-resort of Ciechocinek in the region of Kujawy. The research also included algae occurring in reservoirs with brine condensed on graduation towers, as well as algae from puddles and the soil under the graduation towers. 52 algae taxa were recorded in the collected material. Representatives of the following phyla were distinguished: 5 taxa of Cyanoprokaryota, 46 taxa of Heterokontophyta (including 44 taxa of diatoms) and 7 taxa of Chlorophyta. Samples from the sites with brine of the lowest salt concentration (4%) turned out to be the most abundant in species. Key words: halophylic algae, diatoms Chlorophyta, Dunalulla, brine, saline soils. 1. Introduction ers no. 1 and 3 (Fig. 1). She reported the occurrence of 44 algae species, mainly diatoms. All the aforementioned studies focused on algae in- The occurrence of algae in the environment with extreme habiting puddles and small water bodies with different de- salinity, such as gradually thickened brine flowing down grees of salinity, located within salt marshes. Whereas the the graduation towers in Ciechocinek, evoked interest present paper aims at investigating the algae flora occur- among researchers already since the end of the 19th cen- ring on construction elements of the graduation towers, as tury.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CAMBRIDGE V R SWITSUR and R G WEST Sub
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 17, No. 1, 1975, P. 35-51] UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE NATURAL RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS XIII V R SWITSUR and R G WEST Sub-department of Quaternary Research, 5 Salisbury Villas, Station Road, Cambridge, England The dates presented here were calculated from measurements made at the University Radiocarbon Dating Research Laboratory mostly dur- ing 1973-74. The radioactivity of the samples was counted in gas pro- portional detectors, either silica lined (de Vries et al, 1959) or of pure copper, filled to 2 atmospheres pressure with pure carbon dioxide. The detectors were fixed in, and completely surrounded by, a plastic scintil- lator anticoincidence shield mounted inside a massive lead shield to protect against environmental radiation (Switsur, Hall and West, 1970). Modern sample gas was obtained from the combustion of AD 1845 to 1855 rings of an oak tree grown near Cambridge and felled in 1950. Background samples were prepared from Welsh anthracite. The con- temporary sample was frequently compared with the activity of the NBS oxalic acid international standard. Age calculations were based on the 14C half-life of 5568 years and the uncertainty stated as one stand- ard deviation calculated from the statistical analyses of sample and standards counting rates. Oxidation of the samples was performed in high pressure oxygen in a `bomb' combustion unit (Switsur et al, 1970; Switsur, 1972; Switsur and West, 1973) followed by purification of the carbon dioxide produced. The technique was modified slightly for samples such as limnic mud deposits or gyttja which often contain excessive electronegative impuri- ties and require more extensive purification than wood or charcoal samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in theWest Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colorado Region September 2007 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colorado Region Boulder City, Nevada September 2007 Salton Sea location map. iii Abbreviations and Acronyms ALL Annualized Loss of Life APF Annualized Probability of Failure AQM air quality mitigation BMPs best management practices CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CVWD Coachella Valley Water District DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement DO dissolved oxygen DWR California Department of Water Resources EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERS Ecosystem Restoration Studies H2S hydrogen sulfide IID Imperial Irrigation District IMPLAN IMpact Analysis for PLANning IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LOL loss of life m meters μg/L micrograms per liter maf/yr million acre-feet per year mg/L milligrams per liter msl mean sea level NaCl halite NED national economic development NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NH3 ammonia NWR National Wildlife Refuge OMER&R operation, maintenance, energy, replacement, and risk v Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report Abbreviations and Acronyms (continued) P Phosphorus P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Roceedings Volume 1
    'ROCEEDINGS Second United Nations Symposium on the Development and Use of G eot her ma I Resou rces San Francisco, California, USA 20-29 May 7 975 VOLUME~~ 1 NOTICE Iponartd by the Umtd Sula Gorrmmmt. Nenther the United Suta nor the UNld Suta Energy Rcrlrch and Lkrrlopmnt Adminirimtion. nor my of their cmpbyeu. nor any of them mntmctors. rubeonfncton, or their employ-, rmkn any wmnty, express or implied. or anum' my legd hbilrty or rerponn%ilily for the accuracy. complctencn or urfulner of any mfornntion. appmtu. product or Parr direlord. or represents that its uy would not infriw pdmtdy oruned right,. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DbCUMENT IS UNLIMITEQ DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Facts: Also Occur Here
    Note to Teachers Chemistry in the Gulf of Mexico is a teacher’s instructional guide to accompany the poster of the same title. In this guide, you will find information that relates principles from a basic chemistry class to actual processes occurring in the ocean. This guide will focus on four of these processes. The information and activities are intended for use at the 11-12 grade levels. Additional topics and resources are included at the end of the guide. The Minerals Management Service (MMS) has funded numerous scientific studies to understand better the oceanographic processes in the Gulf of Mexico. This Teacher’s Companion contains information that was gathered during these studies. The MMS is the Federal agency that regulates oil and gas activities on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf. To learn more about the MMS, please visit our website at www.mms.gov. Author: Mary C. Boatman Graphics: Allan Linker Editors: Michael Dorner Deborah Miller Acknowledgments: We wish to thank Ranell Troxler, a sixth grade teacher in St. Charles Parish, for her review of this document. Where to get the Poster and Teacher’s Companion Copies of the poster and Teacher’s Companion may be obtained from the Public Information Office (MS 5034) at the following address: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Public Information Office (MS 5034) 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394 Telephone Number: (504) 736-2519 or 1-800-200-GULF 1 Table of Contents Page Number About This Lesson 3 Where It Fits into the Curriculum 3 Objectives for Students 4 Materials for Students 4 What is Chemical Oceanography? 5 Chemical Oceanography in the Gulf of Mexico 5 Temperature and Salinity Plots 6 Thermocline 6 Suspended Sediments 6 Nutrients 6 Phytoplankton 7 Detrital Rain 7 Hypoxia 7 Currents, Eddies, and Upwelling - The Eddy Graveyard 8 Naturally Occurring Oil Seeps 8 Barite Chimneys 8 Gas Hydrates and Chemosynthetic Communities 9 Naturally Occurring Brine Pools 9 Vocabulary 10 Suggested Topics for Term Papers 11 Activities 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in theWest Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colorado Region September 2007 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colorado Region Boulder City, Nevada September 2007 Salton Sea location map. iii Abbreviations and Acronyms ALL Annualized Loss of Life APF Annualized Probability of Failure AQM air quality mitigation BMPs best management practices CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CVWD Coachella Valley Water District DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement DO dissolved oxygen DWR California Department of Water Resources EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERS Ecosystem Restoration Studies H2S hydrogen sulfide IID Imperial Irrigation District IMPLAN IMpact Analysis for PLANning IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LOL loss of life m meters µg/L micrograms per liter maf/yr million acre-feet per year mg/L milligrams per liter msl mean sea level NaCl halite NED national economic development NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NH3 ammonia NWR National Wildlife Refuge OMER&R operation, maintenance, energy, replacement, and risk v Restoration of the Salton Sea Summary Report Abbreviations and Acronyms (continued) P Phosphorus P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • EB018 Maldon District Historic Environment Characterisation Project
    HISTORICEB018 ENVIRONMENT Maldon District Historic Environment Characterisation Project 2008 abc i EB018 Front Cover: Aerial view of the Causeway onto Northey Island ii EB018 Contents FIGURES........................................................................................................................................................... VII ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................................................X MALDON DISTRICT HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT CHARACTERISATION PROJECT..................... 11 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................... 12 2 THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT OF MALDON DISTRICT .......................................................... 14 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 14 3 CHARACTERISATION OF THE RESOURCE.................................................................................... 33 3.1 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT CHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTIONS.............................................................. 35 3.1.1 HECA 1 Blackwater
    [Show full text]