2020S 2010S -2000S 1990S 1980S 1970S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020S 2010S -2000S 1990S 1980S 1970S 2004: The Man Who Walked between the 2020s Towers, by Mordicai Gerstein 1980s (J 791.3 G) 2020: The Undefeated, by Kwame Alexander 1989: Song and Dance Man, by Karen 2003: My Friend Rabbit, by Eric Rohmann (JP (J 811.6 A) Ackerman (Illustrator Stephen ROH) 2002: The Three Pigs, by David Wiesner Gammell) (JP ACK) 2010s -2000s (JP WIE) 1988: Owl Moon, by Jane Yolen (Illustrator 2019: Hello Lighthouse, by Sophie Blackall 2001: So You Want to Be President?, by John Schoenherr) (JP YOL) (JP BLA) Judith St. George (Illustrator David 1987: Hey, Al, by Arthur Yorinks (Illustrator 2018: Wolf in the Snow, by Matthew Cordell Small) (J 973.099 S, J CDB 973.099 S) Richard Egielski) (JP YOR) (JP COR) 2000: Joseph Had a Little Overcoat, by 1986: The Polar Express, by Chris Van 2017: Radiant Child: The Story of Young Artist Simms Taback (JP TAB) Allsburg (JP VAN, J CDB VAN, Holiday) Jean-Michel Basquiat, by Javaka 1985: Saint George and the Dragon, by Steptoe (JB BAS) Margert Hodges (Illustrator Trina 2016: Finding Winnie: The True Story of the 1990s Hyman) (J 398.2 H) World’s Most Famous Bear, by Lindsay 1999: Snowflake Bentley, by Jacqueline 1984: The Glorious Flight: Across the Mattick (JP MAT) Martin (Illustrator Mary Azarian) Channel with Louis Bleriot, by Alice 2015: The Adventures of Beekle: The (JB BEN) and Martin Provensen (J 629.13 P) Unimaginary Friend, by Dan Santat 1998: Rapunzel, by Paul O. Zelinsky 1983: Shadow, by Marcia Brown (J 811 B) (JP SAN) 1982: Jumanji, by Chris Van Allsburg 2014: Locomotive, by Brian Floca (J 385 F) (J 398.2 Z) 2013: This Is Not My Hat, by Jon Klassen 1997: Golem, by David Wisniewski (JP VAN) (JP KLA) (J 398.2 W) 1981: Fables, by Arnold Lobel (JI LOB) 2012: A Ball for Daisy, by Chris Raschka 1996: Officer Buckle and Gloria, by Peggy 1980: Ox-Cart Man, by Donald Hall (Illustrator Barbara Cooney) (JP HAL) (JP RAS) Rathmann (JP RAT) 2011: A Sick Day for Amos McGee, by Philip 1995: Smoky Night, by Eve Bunting C. Stead (illustrator Erin E. Stead) (JP STE) (Illustrator David Diaz) (JI BUN) 2010: The Lion & the Mouse, by Jerry Pinkney 1994: Grandfather’s Journey, by Allen Say 1970s (J 398.2 P) (JP SAY) 1979: The Girl Who Loved Wild Horses, by 2009: The House in the Night, by Susan Marie 1993: Mirette on the High Wire, by Emily Paul Goble (JP GOB) Swanson (Illustrator Beth Krommes) (JP Arnold McCully (JP MCC) 1978: Noah’s Ark, by Peter Spier (J 220 S) 1938-2020 SWA) 1992: Tuesday, by David Wiesner (JP WIE) 1977: Ashanti to Zulu: African Traditions, by 2008: The Invention of Hugo Cabret, by Brian 1991: Black and White, by David Margaret Musgrove (Illustrator Leo Selznick (J SEL, J CD BOOK SEL) Macaulay (JI MAC) and Diane Dillon) (J 916 M) 2007: Flotsam, by David Wiesner (JP WIE) 1990: Lon Po Po: A Red-Riding Hood Story 1976: Why Mosquitos Buzz in People’s Ears: 2006: The Hello, Goodbye Window, by from China, by Ed Young (J 398.2 Y) A West African Tale, by Verna Norton Juster (Illustrator Chris Raschka) Aardema (Illustrator Leo and Diane (JP JUS) Dillon) (J 398.2 A) 2005: Kitten’s First Full Moon, by Kevin Henkes (JP HEN, J CDB HEN) 1975: Arrow to the Sun, by Gerald 1962: Once a Mouse, by Marcia Brown About the Caldecott Award McDermott (J 398.2 M, JP MCD) (JP BRO) 1940s 1974: Duffy and the Devil, by Harve 1961: Baboushka and the Three Kings, by 1949: The Big Snow, by Berta and Elmer The Caldecott Medal was named in Zemach (Illustrator Margot Zemach) Ruth Robbins (Illustrator Nicolas Hader (JP HAD) honor of nineteenth-century English (JI ZEM) Sidjakov) (JI ROB) 1948: White Snow, Bright Snow, by Alvin 1973: The Funny Little Woman, by Arlene 1960: Nine Days to Christmas, by Marie Tresselt (Illustrator Roger Duvoisin) illustrator Randolph Caldecott. It is Mosel (Illustrator Blair Lent) (JP MOS) Hall Ets (JP ETS, JI ETS) (Holiday) awarded annually by the Association for (JP TRE) 1972: One Fine Day, by Nonny 1947: The Little Island, by Margaret Wise Library Service to Children, a division of Hogrogian (JP HOG) 1950s Brown (Illustrator Leonard Weisgard) the American Library Association, to the 1971: A Story, A Story, by Gail E. Haley (JP BRO) 1959: Chanticleer and the Fox, by artist of the most distinguished American (JP HAL) 1946: The Rooster Crows, by Maud and Geoffrey Chaucer (Illustrator Barbara 1970: Sylvester and the Magic Pebble, picture book for children. Cooney) (JP CHA) Miska Petersham (J 811 P) by William Steig (JP STE) 1945: Prayer for a Child, by Rachel Field 1958: Time of Wonder, by Robert (Illustrator Elizabeth Jones) McCloskey (JP MCC) (JBY FIE, J 217 F) 1960s 1957: A Tree Is Nice, by Janice May Udry 1944: Many Moons, by James Thurber 1969: The Fool of the World and the Flying (Illustrator Marc Simont) (JP UDR) (Illustrator Louis Slobodkin) (JI THU) Ship, by Arthur Ransome (Illustrator Uri 1956: Frog Went A-Courtin’, by John 1943: The Little House, by Virginia Lee Shulevitz) (J 398.2 R) Langstaff (Illustrator Feodor Burton (JP BUR) 1968: Drummer Hoff, by Barbara Emberley Rojankovsky) (JP LAN) 1942: Make Way for Ducklings, by Robert (Illustrator Ed Emberley) (JP EMB) 1955: Cinderella, or, The Little Glass McCloskey (JP MCC) 1967: Sam, Bangs & Moonshine, by Slipper, by Marcia Brown (J 398 B) 1941: They Were Strong and Good, by Evaline Ness (JP NES) 1954: Madeline’s Rescue, by Ludwig Hancock County Public Library Robert Lawson (J 920 L) 1966: Always Room for One More, by Bemelmans (JP BEM) 1940: Abraham Lincoln, by Ingri D’Aulaire Sorche Nic Leodhas (Illustrator Nonny 1953: The Biggest Bear, by Lynd Ward 900 W. McKenzie Rd., and Edgar Parin (JB LIN) Hogrogian) (JP NIC) (JP WAR) Greenfield, IN 46140-1082 1965: May I Bring a Friend?, by Beatrice 1952: Finders Keepers, by William Lipkind Children’s desk: (317) 462-5141, ext. 238 De Regniers (Illustrator Beni Montresor) (Illustrator Nicolas Mordvinoff) (JP WIL) 1930s 5731 W. U.S. 52, New Palestine, IN 46163 (JP DER) 1951: The Egg Tree, by Katherine Milhous 1939: Mei Li, by Thomas Handforth (No Children’s desk: (317) 861-6618, ext. 313 1964: Where the Wild Things Are, by (JI MIL) (Holiday) longer available in print.) Maurice Sendak. (JP SEN, J CD BOOK 1950: Song of the Swallows, by Leo Politi 1938: Animals of the Bible, by Helen Dean hcplibrary.org SEN, J CB SEN, J DVD WHE) (JP POL) Fish (illustrator Dorothy P. Lathrop) 1963: The Snowy Day, by Ezra Jack Keats (J 220.859 A) (JP KEA) Updated 2-10-2020 .
Recommended publications
  • Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2020 3
    SIPRI Fact Sheet March 2021 TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL KEY FACTS w The volume of international ARMS TRANSFERS, 2020 transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent pieter d. wezeman, alexandra kuimova and higher than in 2006–10. siemon t. wezeman w The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the The volume of international transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was United States, Russia, France, 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent higher than in 2006–10 Germany and China. Together, they accounted for 76 per cent of (see figure 1).1 The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the United all exports of major arms in States, Russia, France, Germany and China (see table 1). The five largest 2016–20. arms importers were Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Australia and China w In 2016–20 US arms exports (see table 2). Between 2011–15 and 2016–20 there were increases in arms accounted for 37 per cent of the transfers to the Middle East (25 per cent) and to Europe (12 per cent), while global total and were 15 per cent there were decreases in the transfers to Africa (–13 per cent), the Americas higher than in 2011–15. (–43 per cent), and Asia and Oceania (–8.3 per cent). w Russian arms exports From 15 March 2021 SIPRI’s open-access Arms Transfers Database decreased by 22 per cent includes updated data on transfers of major arms for 1950–2020, which between 2011–15 and 2016–20.
    [Show full text]
  • [20Pt]Algorithms for Constrained Optimization: [ 5Pt]
    SOL Optimization 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s Summary 2020s Algorithms for Constrained Optimization: The Benefits of General-purpose Software Michael Saunders MS&E and ICME, Stanford University California, USA 3rd AI+IoT Business Conference Shenzhen, China, April 25, 2019 Optimization Software 3rd AI+IoT Business Conference, Shenzhen, April 25, 2019 1/39 SOL Optimization 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s Summary 2020s SOL Systems Optimization Laboratory George Dantzig, Stanford University, 1974 Inventor of the Simplex Method Father of linear programming Large-scale optimization: Algorithms, software, applications Optimization Software 3rd AI+IoT Business Conference, Shenzhen, April 25, 2019 2/39 SOL Optimization 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s Summary 2020s SOL history 1974 Dantzig and Cottle start SOL 1974{78 John Tomlin, LP/MIP expert 1974{2005 Alan Manne, nonlinear economic models 1975{76 MS, MINOS first version 1979{87 Philip Gill, Walter Murray, MS, Margaret Wright (Gang of 4!) 1989{ Gerd Infanger, stochastic optimization 1979{ Walter Murray, MS, many students 2002{ Yinyu Ye, optimization algorithms, especially interior methods This week! UC Berkeley opened George B. Dantzig Auditorium Optimization Software 3rd AI+IoT Business Conference, Shenzhen, April 25, 2019 3/39 SOL Optimization 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s Summary 2020s Optimization problems Minimize an objective function subject to constraints: 0 x 1 min '(x) st ` ≤ @ Ax A ≤ u c(x) x variables 0 1 A matrix c1(x) B . C c(x) nonlinear functions @ . A c (x) `; u bounds m Optimization
    [Show full text]
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003
    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation 2030 Disruption and Its Implications for the Aviation Sector Thriving on Disruption Series
    Aviation 2030 Disruption and its implications for the aviation sector Thriving on disruption series Major disruption is promised by a range of powerful new technologies and public pressure. Players that turn these trends to their advantage have the opportunity to reshape the industry. In this piece, we evaluate the potential for alternative energy sources, maintenance robotics, and the return of supersonic. We do this through the lens of 5 key player types. Christopher Brown Jono Anderson KPMG in Ireland KPMG in the US Global Strategy Group Kieran O’Brien Charlie Simpson KPMG International KPMG in Ireland KPMG in the UK Introduction Aviation has long been glamorous, but for some players in the value chain, it has also often proved to be unprofitable. Despite current headwinds, aviation Elsewhere in KPMG’s Mobility 2030 has arguably experienced a golden series,3 we have looked at changes age: a phase of relatively profitable affecting ground transport, and in growth, driven especially by ‘Getting Mobility off the ground’4 commercial passengers in developing we considered air-based disruption markets. The International Air in short-distance travel. In KPMG’s Transport Association (IATA) forecasts annual Aviation Industry Leaders that global passenger numbers will Report,5 we look at the ‘traditional’ almost double by 2037, reaching aviation industry’s topical issues. 8.2 billion annually.1 To match that demand, the aviation industry is In this paper, we focus on select continuing to raise output to historic issues for traditional aviation, with highs. In July 2018, Airbus announced that longer-term 2030 lens. In that over 37,000 new aircraft – valued particular, we consider the disruption at $5.8 trillion – are required over 20 potential related to developments in: years.2 With regular retirement of • Alternative energy sources older fleet, that equates to a doubling of the world’s passenger fleet to • Maintenance robotics more than 48,000 aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It
    September 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE JAMES DOBBINS, GABRIELLE TARINI, ALI WYNE The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It n the aftermath of World War II, the United States accepted the mantle of global leadership and worked to build a new global order based on the principles of nonaggression and open, nondiscriminatory trade. An early pillar of this new Iorder was the Marshall Plan for European reconstruction, which British histo- rian Norman Davies has called “an act of the most enlightened self-interest in his- tory.”1 America’s leaders didn’t regard this as charity. They recognized that a more peaceful and more prosperous world would be in America’s self-interest. American willingness to shoulder the burdens of world leadership survived a costly stalemate in the Korean War and a still more costly defeat in Vietnam. It even survived the end of the Cold War, the original impetus for America’s global activ- ism. But as a new century progressed, this support weakened, America’s influence slowly diminished, and eventually even the desire to exert global leadership waned. Over the past two decades, the United States experienced a dramatic drop-off in international achievement. A generation of Americans have come of age in an era in which foreign policy setbacks have been more frequent than advances. C O R P O R A T I O N Awareness of America’s declining influence became immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and by Obama commonplace among observers during the Barack Obama with Ebola, has also been widely noted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pivot in Southeast Asia Balancing Interests and Values
    WORKING PAPER The Pivot in Southeast Asia Balancing Interests and Values Joshua Kurlantzick January 2015 This publication has been made possible by a grant from the Open Society Foun- dations. The project on the pivot and human rights in Southeast Asia is also sup- ported by the United States Institute of Peace. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, busi- ness executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major in- ternational issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy is- sues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Finance Report 2015
    AVIATION FINANCE REPORT 2015 U.S. economy. With that tightening of The rising dollar and declining aircraft residual values the labor market, more competition for workers should translate to rising are proving to be a drag on the industry’s recovery wages, which would further stimulate the U.S. economy.” www.ainonline.com by Curt Epstein Despite the brightening economic picture in the U.S., for many the With the economic downturn now bellwethers such as the stock mar- wounds from the downturn inspire seven years in the rear-view mirror, the ket indexes reached record levels in caution in the decision-making pro- U.S. economy has continued its slow but late May, when the Dow Jones Indus- cesses. In this economic expansion, steady recovery this year, reaching, in trial Average hit 18,312 and the S&P notes Wayne Starling, senior vice pres- the eyes of most of the world, an envi- 500 peaked at 2,131. Likewise, unem- ident and national sales manager for able streak of 22 consecutive quarters of ployment has dropped from a high of PNC Aviation Finance, “companies expansion. But the strengthening of the 10 percent in October 2009 to nearly and individuals have retained more U.S. dollar has placed a chill on the inter- half that now. “We continue to reduce cash, deferred capital expenditures and national business jet market, which is still the slack in the labor market that has deferred investment in plant, property dealing with the effects of declining air- persisted since the great recession,” and equipment” to a greater extent than craft residual values.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain in the 2020S
    REPORT FUTURE PROOF BRITAIN IN THE 2020S Mathew Lawrence December 2016 © IPPR 2016 Institute for Public Policy Research INTRODUCTION Brexit is the firing gun on a decade of disruption. As the UK negotiates its new place in the world, an accelerating wave of economic, social and technological change will reshape the country, in often quite radical ways. In this report, we set out five powerful trends that will drive change in the 2020s. 1. A demographic tipping point: As the population grows, the UK is set to age sharply and become increasingly diverse. Globally, the long expansion of the working-age CONTENTS population is set to slow sharply. 2. An economic world transformed: The economic world order will become more Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 fragile as globalisation evolves, trade patterns shift, and economic power gravitates toward Asia. At the same time, developed economies are likely to struggle to escape Executive summary: The UK in 2030 ..................................................................... 4 conditions of secular stagnation. The institutions governing the global economy are A world transformed: Five major disruptive forces reshaping Britain .................. 6 likely to come under intense pressure as the American hegemony that underpinned the postwar international order fades and the Global South rises in economic and Britain at the periphery? ..................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020S Will Be a Crunch Decade That Will Determine the UK's
    Torsten Swati Stephen Charlie Henry Gregory Daniel Anna May 18th, Bell Dhingra Machin McCurdy Overman Thwaites Tomlinson Valero 2021 The 2020s will be a crunch decade that will determine the UK’s trajectory into the mid-21st century 0 comments | 5 shares Estimated reading time: 7 minutes As vaccines roll out and restrictions are lifted, public debate is turning to the economic recovery from COVID-19 and the deepest annual downturn for 300 years that came in its wake. But viewing the years ahead simply as the post-pandemic period is far too limited a frame, say the authors of the Economy 2020 Inquiry. Instead, the 2020s look set to be the decisive decade during which the UK will need to renew its approach to achieving economic success. The economic shock caused by COVID-19 and the associated containment measures resulted in the largest annual contraction in GDP in three centuries. Unprecedented scal support sustained household incomes and attenuated the rise in unemployment and business insolvencies. And a successful vaccination rollout means a recovery is now underway and forecast to continue, even if the uneven global rollout of vaccinations and related risk of mutations pose risks. Choices countries make do matter for their relative economic strengths As with any major recession, the pandemic will drive change for years to come. But it will do so in unique ways. All downturns have lasting impacts from the direct effects on people (e.g. unemployment) and rms (e.g. debt). This crisis will be no exception. The associated rise in unemployment will last for several years, while the highly unequal impact of the crisis will have a lasting legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opioid Epidemic: a Geography in Two Phases David A
    A report summary from the Economic Research Service April 2021 The Opioid Epidemic: A Geography in Two Phases David A. McGranahan and Timothy S. Parker What Is the Issue? Since the late 1990s, an opioid epidemic has afflicted the U.S. population, particularly people in prime working ages of 25-54. Driven by the opioid epidemic, the age-adjusted overall mortality rate from drug overdoses rose from 6.1 per 100,000 people in 1999 to 21.7 per 100,000 in 2017, before dropping to 20.7 per 100,000 in 2018. The drug overdose mortality rate among the prime working age population was 36.5 deaths per 100,000 people in 2018. Among major causes of death in this population, this rate was exceeded only by cancer (40.5 deaths per 100,000) in 2018. What caused this epidemic, and who has been most affected? One view is that economic misfor- tune has driven many working-age people to self-destructive behavior—marked by increasing drug and alcohol abuse and suicide. However, another line of research shows that local economic downturns have been a small factor in the geography of the drug overdose epidemic. A second view faults the widespread introduction of new opioid prescription painkillers, succeeded in recent years by the spread of heroin and powerful synthetics such as fentanyl. This view, which has received less research attention, is the focus of this study. What Did the Study Find? The study found evidence that the introduction and supply of new opioid drugs, whether through prescription painkillers in the 2000s or illicit opioids such as fentanyl in the 2010s, were major drivers of the opioid epidemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends 2025: a Transformed World
    This page left intentionally blank. Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800; Fax: (202) 512-2104; Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-081834-9 To view electronic version: www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html November 2008 NIC 2008-003 We prepared Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World to stimulate strategic thinking about the future by identifying key trends, the factors that drive them, where they seem to be headed, and how they might interact. It uses scenarios to illustrate some of the many ways in which the drivers examined in the study (e.g., globalization, demography, the rise of new powers, the decay of international institutions, climate change, and the geopolitics of energy) may interact to generate challenges and opportunities for future decisionmakers. The study as a whole is more a description of the factors likely to shape events than a prediction of what will actually happen. By examining a small number of variables that we judge probably will have a disproportionate influence on future events and possibilities, the study seeks to help readers to recognize signposts indicating where events are headed and to identify opportunities for policy intervention to change or lock in the trajectories of specific developments. Among the messages we hope to convey are: “If you like where events seem to be headed, you may want to take timely action to preserve their positive trajectory. If you do not like where they appear to be going, you will have to develop and implement policies to change their trajectory.” For example, the report’s examination of the transition out of dependence on fossil fuels illustrates how different trajectories will entail different consequences for specific countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Transcript
    A Deeper-Look: How military and development actors share the battlespace February 2020 Patrick Fine and Lieutenant General David Barno, USA, Retired Page 1 of 19 [Music] Patrick Fine: As we enter the 2020s, we see a world of growing great power competition where the effects of climate change are becoming more and more apparent and where non-state actors threaten sovereign states and national governments. We've seen more migration than ever before in history over the last few years, something we've explored in depth in previous podcasts, and we're seeing how these same factors fuel conflict and threaten longstanding international arrangements. Voiceover: A Deeper Look. Exploring what works and what doesn't in development, and the changes we can make together to turn ideas into action. Patrick Fine: Welcome, listeners. I'm Patrick Fine, CEO of FHI 360 and host of A Deeper Look. This season, we're taking a deeper look at the trends, ideas and forces that will shape the future of development. Today, I'm joined by Lieutenant General David Barno to explore how evolving security challenges will shape the way we think about and address human development needs. General, welcome to the podcast. Gen. David Barno: It's great to be here, Patrick. Patrick Fine: General, even as the world has grown more prosperous, we're seeing complex human development challenges, particularly in places affected by conflict. In our last episode, we had Masood Ahmed from the Center for Global Development, and he observed that a rising tide has lifted many boats, but there are places where the tide does not reach and those are characterized by fragility, instability, and conflict.
    [Show full text]