Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report Anne Teravainen, Clémence Pabion, Christina Clark July 2016 About the National Literacy Trust We are a national charity dedicated to raising literacy levels in the UK. Our research and analysis make us the leading authority on literacy. We run projects in the poorest communities, campaign to make literacy a priority for politicians and parents, and support schools. Copyright © National Literacy Trust 2016. You may report on findings or statistics included in this report if you accredit them to the National Literacy Trust. Suggested reference for this report is : Teravainen A., Pabion C., Clark C. (2016). Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report. London: National Literacy Trust We will consider requests to use extracts or data from this publication provided that you: Acknowledge that the content is the work of the National Literacy Trust and provide appropriate references in any publications or accompanying publicity; State that any views expressed are yours and not necessarily those of the National Literacy Trust. © National Literacy Trust Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report 2016 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The evaluation of Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum (OGM) used both quantitative and qualitative elements. Three surveys were conducted at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the programme. The final evaluation compared results from the first and last survey in six schools that took part in both. In addition, attainment data provided by the schools were analysed. The evaluation also used case studies, consultant reports and half-termly progress trackers to create robust analyses of the impact of the programme. Overall the evaluation found that OGM has resulted in positive teacher outcomes, positive whole school outcomes and emerging positive student outcomes. The evaluation found that at the end of the programme teachers have: Improved attitudes and increased awareness More teachers agree that it is their responsibility to teach literacy, they have generally positive attitudes towards teaching literacy and fewer see a lack of time and a lack of understanding of the importance of literacy as barriers to teaching literacy in their school. Interviewees attributed the positive attitudinal change directly to their school’s participation in OGM and the extensive amount of work done in the school as a result. They have also noticed an improvement of awareness: more non-English teachers are aware that literacy is a part of their teaching job while some English teachers have become more aware of how literacy is perceived and understood by their non-English teaching colleagues. Improved knowledge and strategy use More teachers are familiar with evidence-based approaches and more have particular strategies or approaches to teaching literacy that they feel work well. The qualitative data show that teachers and literacy leaders give positive feedback about the continuous professional development (CPD) sessions and the strategies that they gained from the sessions. In addition, consultants noticed during their visits that teachers were using their newly acquired knowledge about literacy approaches in class. Increased confidence Teachers’ general confidence in teaching literacy has increased over the course of the programme as has their confidence in developing the literacy skills of specific groups of pupils, for example those receiving free school meals (FSM) and Able, Gifted and Talented (AG&T) pupils. Positive classroom practices across all subjects Teachers’ perception of developing their pupils’ literacy skills has improved over the course of the programme. The consultant reports from spring 2016 school visits unanimously evidence improvements in teachers’ classroom practices, marking and literacy efforts. © National Literacy Trust Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report 2016 2 Participants also describe the numerous strategies inspired by the OGM CPD and resources that they have started to use in class. The data shows that English teachers who took part in the programme have also benefited. The whole school positive outcomes were: Teachers feel better supported with literacy teaching in their school More teachers feel that they get helpful literacy CPD support and all the support they need from colleagues to help support children’s literacy skills. The qualitative data show that Inset days and co-coaching efforts, some of which are directly linked to participation in the OGM programme, have also provided support for teachers. Strong strategic vision for literacy The qualitative data show that schools’ literacy efforts are now more focused, targeted and much better coordinated among teachers. In some schools, a “literacy leading team” has taken charge of disseminating best practice throughout departments and providing skills training, as well as encouragement and support to their colleagues. The qualitative data also show evidence of effective literacy strategies being rolled out across the school and that the senior management’s involvement in the project resulted in the most positive experiences. Evidence of planning beyond the scope of the programme was also found. There is also evidence of a truly reflective process within schools to bring about effective change and a positive impact on students. Greater awareness of school provision for literacy More teachers say that literacy is included in their school improvement plan and in their department or faculty action plan as a top priority. More teachers are also aware of particular efforts towards literacy in their school, such as a literacy marking policy. The qualitative data also show that teachers have noticed the numerous efforts to promote literacy made by their school since joining OGM and can name various initiatives that they are implementing. Those efforts are particularly focused on reading and writing for pleasure, rather than speaking and listening. Pupils’ attainment, attitudes and behaviour also improved: Pupils read more frequently outside class Pupils’ attitudes towards reading have become more positive Pupils’ attitudes towards writing have improved Pupils also have more positive attitudes towards communication skills Attainment data were only available from less than half of the schools and are therefore not sufficient to draw conclusions. However, the available data show no difference in © National Literacy Trust Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report 2016 3 pupils’ attainment. Nevertheless, teachers and consultants have noticed progress in pupils’ attainment in all areas of literacy. The lack of progress was attributed to need for more time to evidence impact on attainment. © National Literacy Trust Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report 2016 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the pupils and staff at the following schools without whom this study would not have been possible: Bartholomew School, The Bicester School, Blessed George Napier Catholic School and Sixth Form, Carterton Community College, The Cooper School, Faringdon Community College, Fitzharrys School, Gosford Hill School, The Henry Box School, Icknield Community College, King Alfred's Academy, Larkmead School, The Marlborough School, North Oxfordshire Academy, St. Gregory the Great Catholic School, The Warriner School, Wood Green School. In addition, we would like to extend our sincere thanks to the consultants who lent themselves to evaluation visits, and who provided a wealth of data for the evaluation. Paul Clayton, Emma Cronshaw, Jane Davies, Jackie Easter, Suzanne Edwards, Alan Howe, Gillian Spence, Gillian Woodland. © National Literacy Trust Oxfordshire Gaining Momentum Impact Evaluation Report 2016 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 5 Table of contents .................................................................................................................. 6 Table of figures ..................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8 Programme description ..................................................................................................... 8 Evaluation methodology .................................................................................................... 8 Description of the quantitative samples .......................................................................... 9 Positive teacher outcomes .................................................................................................. 10 More positive attitudes to teaching literacy and increased awareness of importance of literacy ............................................................................................................................. 10 Case study examples ............................................................................................... 12 Improved knowledge and confidence in teaching literacy, and improved literacy practices ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Teachers have