DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Middle East Paleozoic Plate Tectonics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Middle East Paleozoic Plate Tectonics GeoArabia, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007 Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain Middle East Paleozoic Plate Tectonics Review of Middle East Paleozoic plate tectonics Dmitry A. Ruban, Moujahed I. Al-Husseini and Yumiko Iwasaki ABSTRACT The Paleozoic Middle East terranes, neighboring the present-day Arabian and Levant plates, are shown by most authors to consist of ten major tectonic units: (1 and 2) the Helmand and Farah terranes of Afghanistan, southwest Pakistan and southeast Turkmenistan; (3 to 6) the Alborz, Central Iran (Lut, Yazd and Tabas) and Sanandaj- Sirjan terranes of Iran, and Northwest Iran (possibly extending into eastern Turkey); (7 and 8) the Pontides and Taurides terranes of Turkey; and (9 and 10) the Greater and Lesser Caucasus terranes between the Caspian and Black seas (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and southwest Russia). Published plate-tectonic reconstructions indicate that all ten terranes may have broken off from either: (1) the Gondwana Supercontinent in the mid-Silurian as part of the Hun Superterrane; or (2) the Pangea Supercontinent during the mid-Permian - Triassic as part of the Cimmeria Superterrane. To the north of Gondwana and Pangea, three successively younger Tethyan oceans evolved: (1) Proto-Tethys (Cambrian - Devonian); (2) Paleo-Tethys (mid-Silurian - Mesozoic); and (3) Neo-Tethys (mid-Permian - Cenozoic). Two regional Paleozoic unconformities in the Arabian Plate are generally linked to major regional-scale structural events, and commonly correlated to the Caledonian and Hercynian orogenies. These orogenies took place many thousands of kilometers away from the Arabian Plate and are considered unlikely causes for these unconformities. Instead, the breakaway of the Hun and Cimmeria superterranes are considered as alternative near-field tectonic sources. The older unconformity (middle Paleozoic event), represented by a mid-Silurian to Middle Devonian hiatus in North Arabia (Iraq and Syria), reflects an episode of epeirogenic uplift, which might be related to the mid-Silurian rift of the Hun Superterrane. The younger mid-Carboniferous Arabia-wide angular unconformity involved compressional faulting and epeirogenic uplift, and might be related to the earliest phase of subduction by the Paleo-Tethyan crust beneath Cimmeria (Sanandaj-Sirjan and nearby regions) before it broke off. Based on our review and regional considerations, we assign the Helmand, Farah, Central Iran, Alborz, Sanandaj-Sirjan, Northwest Iran, Lesser Caucasus, Taurides and Pontides to Cimmeria, whereas the Greater Caucasus is considered Hunic. INTRODUCTION During the past decade, our general knowledge on the geochronological evolution, paleopositions, paleotectonic compositions and paleogeographic outlines of the Phanerozoic supercontinents has significantly improved (e.g. Dalziel, 1997; Stampfli et al., 2001, 2002; Lindsay, 2002; Cocks and Torsvik, 2002; Lawver et al., 2002; Stampfli and Borel, 2002; Veevers, 2003; Pesonen et al., 2003; von Raumer et al., 2002, 2003; Golonka, 2004; Scotese, 2004; Torsvik and Cocks, 2004). Yet today, many uncertainties persist in reconstructing the geological evolution of the regions adjoining the supercontinents, especially for the Paleozoic Era (Cocks and Torsvik, 2002; Torsvik and Cocks, 2004; Scotese, 2004). These regions are in themselves vast, and consist of numerous plate-tectonic units that are sometimes referred to as microplates, terranes, blocks, structural domains, and sometimes grouped into superterranes. The Middle East is a typical example of a border-region that consists of a complex mosaic of tectonic units (Figures 1 and 2). We identify the Middle East terranes, bordering the present-day Arabian and Levant plates, in Afghanistan, Iran, western Pakistan, Turkey, southeast Turkmenistan and the Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and southwest Russia) (Figures 1 and 2). Several of these terranes are strongly deformed and stacked within a wide tectonic belt between the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates. 35 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/12/3/35/4566842/ruban.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Ruban et al. PLATES AND TERRANES OF THE MIDDLE EAST 20 30 40 50 60 70 FORMER ROMANIA YUGOSLAVIA EURASIAN PLATE Tect ALBANIA BULGARIA onic c Black Sea ollage Aral KAZAKHSTAN 40 Sea Greater Caucasus GREECE Pontides Caspian Less Sea UZBEKISTAN er Caucasus TURKEY East Karakum- 40 Taurides Turkey TURKMENISTAN Turan Northwes Kopet-Dag CYPRUS Iran t Mediterranean Sea SYRIA Alborz LEBANON LIBYA Farah 30 JORDAN Sana IRAQ IRAN Central Iran AFGHANISTAN Karakoram ndaj-Sirja Zagros Levant Helmand KUWAIT n 30 EGYPT PAKISTAN INDIAN PLATE BAHRAIN ARABIAN Makran PLATE Arabian QATAR Gulf 20 Red UAE INDIA Sea SAUDI ARABIA Arabian Sea AFRICAN PLATE OMAN 20 SUDAN ERITREA N YEMEN 0 500 1,000 ETHIOPIA Indian Ocean Km 10 30 40 50 60 70 Figure 1: The Middle East region consists of the present-day Arabian and Levant plates and numerous terranes (individual boundaries are shown in blue). During the Paleozoic ten large terranes are variably interpreted to have been adjacentSOMALIA to the Arabian and Levant plates (then attached 10to Gondwana and later Pangea). The Paleozoic Middle East terranes (colored brown) include Helmand and Farah (Afghanistan, southwest Pakistan and southeast Turkmenistan); Iran’s Alborz, Northwest Iran, Sanandaj-Sirjan and Central Iran; Turkey’s Pontides and Taurides; and the Greater and Lesser CaucasusZAIRE between the Caspian and Black seas (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and southwest Russia). The Makran and East Turkey regions may have a Paleozoic core or could have formed as Mesozoic 00 UGANDA accretionaryLake terranes.KENYA Victoria 00 Although30 T ANZANIAtheir boundaries40 are generally traced along50 well-preserved or/and60 reactivated Paleozoic 70fault systems, in some cases the borders remain unclear. Correlation of the sedimentary core complexes, however, suggests that all of these terranes share a common ancestry during some time in the Paleozoic Era. The Middle East terranes were affected by the evolution of the Paleozoic Tethyan oceans, the Hun (Hunic or Intermediate) and Cimmeria (Cimmerian) superterranes, and the Gondwana and Pangea supercontinents (Figures 3 to 11; e.g. Sengör, 1990; Stampfli, 1996; von Raumer, 1998; Cocks and Torsvik, 2002; von Raumer et al., 2002, 2003; Stampfli and Borel, 2002; Stampfli et al., 2001, 2002; Torsvik and Cocks, 2004; Natal’in and Sengör, 2005; Xypolias et al., 2006). At least three major Paleozoic rift episodes occurred along the margins of Gondwana and Pangea (Figures 4 to 11). The first was in the Early Ordovician when Avalonia broke off from Gondwana. This episode was unlikely to have influenced the Middle East region, which was located about 6,000 km away (Figure 4). The second involved the mid-Silurian breakaway of the Hun Superterrane (Figures 6 and 7), the detailed reconstruction of 36 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/12/3/35/4566842/ruban.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Middle East Paleozoic Plate Tectonics SUPERCONTINENTS, PLATES AND TERRANES Laurentia Kara Laurentia A NW British Isles va Chukot ATLANTIC lonia OCEAN Armorica P Siberia eru Au n stro ica 60 N Alp - Med ine Baltica Sea Hellenic Moesia Tectonic West Siberian Manchurides collage Basin Apulia Pontides Ural Mountains Kazakh Tau G Causus Terranes Adria L rides Causus K E Tur arakum N 30 N W K North o I pe China ra -T n t-D uran Tarim Sanandaj- ag Sirjan Alborz Farah North Tibet (Qiangtang) PACIFIC OCEAN Central Karakoram South Tibet South Iran Helmand China Africa Makran Arabia India Arabian Annamia GONDWANA Sea Supercontinent LAURUSSIA Supercontinent Sibumasu HUN Superterrane Equ CIMMERIA ator INDIAN OCEAN Superterrane Other 60 E 90 E 120 E Figure 2: The majority of the plates and terranes discussed in this review are shown after Torsvik and Cocks (2004). Besides the NW British Isles and the Chukot Peninsula in Russia, the Laurentia Supercontinent included North America and Greenland (see Figures 4 and 5). Laurentia later collided with Baltica and Avalonia to form the Laurussia Supercontinent (Figure 7). Besides Arabia, Africa and India, the Gondwana Supercontinent included Antarctica, Australia and Madagascar (see Figure 4). Also shown are terranes that may have been part of the Hun and Cimmeria Superterranes. Note that Karakoram in north Pakistan is Cimmerian and different from the Hunic Karakum-Turan terrane. which is unresolved due to insufficient paleomagnetic and paleontological data. This episode is relevant to our review because parts of the superterrane may have involved the Middle East terranes. The third episode is the mid-Permian - Triassic breakaway of several Middle East Cimmerian terranes from Gondwana, by then a part of Pangea (Figures 10 and 11). In most Paleozoic reconstructions, the Middle East region is interpreted as part of the passive margin of Gondwana and Pangea until the mid-Permian - Triassic, when Cimmeria started to rift away, causing the opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean (e.g. Sharland et al., 2001; Stampfli et al., 2001). In addition, two regional unconformities are recognized. The first corresponds to a mid-Silurian to Middle Devonian hiatus – “middle Paleozoic hiatus” – that is sometimes correlated with the Caledonian Orogeny (e.g. Buday, 1980) (Figures 3, 5 to 7). The second unconformity represents a “mid-Carboniferous hiatus”, and is often correlated to the Hercynian Orogeny (e.g. Berberian and King, 1981) (Figures 3 and 9). These correlations do not provide a satisfactory plate-tectonic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IRN Population Movement Snapshot June 2021
    AFGHAN POPULATION MOVEMENT SNAPSHOT June 2021 Since the 1979 Soviet invasion and the subsequent waves of violence that have rocked Afghanistan, millions of Afghans have fled the country, seeking safety elsewhere. The Islamic Republic of Iran boasts 5,894 km of borders. Most of it, including the 921 km that are shared with Afghanistan, are porous and located in remote areas. While according to the Government of Iran (GIRI), some 1,400-2,500 Afghans arrive in Iran every day, recently GIRI has indicated increased daily movements with 4,000-5,000 arriving every day. These people aren’t necesserily all refugees, it is a mixed flow that includes people being pushed by the lack of economic opportunities as well as those who might be in need of international protection. The number fluctuates due to socio-economic challenges both in Iran and Afghanistan and also the COVID-19 situation. UNHCR Iran does not have access to border points and thus is unable to independently monitor arrivals or returns of Afghans. Afghans who currently reside in Iran have dierent statuses: some are refugees (Amayesh card holders), other are Afghans who posses a national passport, while other are undocumented. These populations move across borders in various ways. it is understood that many Afghans in Iran who have passports or are undocumented may have protection needs. 780,000 2.1 M 586,000 704 Amayesh Card Holders (Afghan refugees1) undocumented Afghans passport holders voluntarily repatriated in 2021 In 2001, the Government of Iran issues Amayesh Undocumented is an umbrella term used to There are 275,000 Afghans who hold family Covid-19 had a clear impact on the low VolRep cards to regularize the stay of Afghan refugees.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Rebound and Plate Spreading: Results from the First Countrywide GPS Observations in Iceland
    Geophys. J. Int. (2009) 177, 691–716 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04059.x Glacial rebound and plate spreading: results from the first countrywide GPS observations in Iceland ∗ T. Arnad´ ottir,´ 1 B. Lund,2 W. Jiang,1 H. Geirsson,3 H. Bjornsson,¨ 4 P. Einarsson4 and T. Sigurdsson5 1Nordic Volcanological Center, Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, IS-101 Reykjav´ık, Iceland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen¨ 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 3Physics Department, Icelandic Meteorological Office, Reykjav´ık, Iceland 4Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, IS-101 Reykjav´ık, Iceland 5National Land Survey of Iceland, Akranes, Iceland Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/177/2/691/2023257 by guest on 30 September 2021 Accepted 2008 December 10. Received 2008 December 5; in original form 2008 June 12 SUMMARY Iceland is one of the few places on Earth where a divergent plate boundary can be observed on land. Direct observations of crustal deformation for the whole country are available for the first time from nationwide Global Positioning System (GPS) campaigns in 1993 and 2004. The plate spreading across the island is imaged by the horizontal velocity field and high uplift rates (≥10 mm yr−1) are observed over a large part of central and southeastern Iceland. Several earthquakes, volcanic intrusions and eruptions occurred during the time spanned by the measurements, causing local disturbances of the deformation field. After correcting for the largest earthquakes during the observation period, we calculate the strain rate field and find that the main feature of the field is the extension across the rift zones, subparallel to the direction of plate motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland Is Cool: an Origin for the Iceland Volcanic Province in the Remelting of Subducted Iapetus Slabs at Normal Mantle Temperatures
    Iceland is cool: An origin for the Iceland volcanic province in the remelting of subducted Iapetus slabs at normal mantle temperatures G. R. Foulger§1 & Don L. Anderson¶ §Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Rd., Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K. ¶California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, MC 252-21, Pasadena, CA 91125, U. S. A. Abstract The time-progressive volcanic track, high temperatures, and lower-mantle seismic anomaly predicted by the plume hypothesis are not observed in the Iceland region. A model that fits the observations better attributes the enhanced magmatism there to the extraction of melt from a region of upper mantle that is at relatively normal temperature but more fertile than average. The source of this fertility is subducted Iapetus oceanic crust trapped in the Caledonian suture where it is crossed by the mid-Atlantic ridge. The extraction of enhanced volumes of melt at this locality on the spreading ridge has built a zone of unusually thick crust that traverses the whole north Atlantic. Trace amounts of partial melt throughout the upper mantle are a consequence of the more fusible petrology and can explain the seismic anomaly beneath Iceland and the north Atlantic without the need to appeal to very high temperatures. The Iceland region has persistently been characterised by complex jigsaw tectonics involving migrating spreading ridges, microplates, oblique spreading and local variations in the spreading direction. This may result from residual structural complexities in the region, inherited from the Caledonian suture, coupled with the influence of the very thick crust that must rift in order to accommodate spreading-ridge extension.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Open University Geological Society
    0 OUGS Proceedings 5 2019_OUGSJ 26/02/2019 11:45 Page i Proceedings of the Open University Geological Society Volume 5 2019 Including articles from the AGM 2018 Geoff Brown Memorial Lecture, the ‘Music of the Earth’ Symposium 2018 lectures (Worcester University), OUGS Members’ field trip reports, the Annual Report for 2018, and the 2018 Moyra Eldridge Photographic Competition Winning and Highly Commended photographs Edited and designed by: Dr David M. Jones 41 Blackburn Way, Godalming, Surrey GU7 1JY e-mail: [email protected] The Open University Geological Society (OUGS) and its Proceedings Editor accept no responsibility for breach of copyright. Copyright for the work remains with the authors, but copyright for the published articles is that of the OUGS. ISSN 2058-5209 © Copyright reserved Proceedings of the OUGS 5 2019; published 2019; printed by Hobbs the Printers Ltd, Totton, Hampshire 0 OUGS Proceedings 5 2019_OUGSJ 26/02/2019 11:46 Page 35 The complex tectonic evolution of the Malvern region: crustal accretion followed by multiple extensional and compressional reactivation Tim Pharaoh British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG ([email protected]) Abstract The Malvern Hills include some of the oldest rocks in southern Britain, dated by U-Pb zircon analysis to c. 680Ma. They reflect calc- alkaline arc magmatic activity along a margin of the Rodinia palaeocontinent, hints of which are provided by inherited zircon grains as old as 1600Ma. Metamorphic recrystallisation under upper greenschist/amphibolite facies conditions occurred from c. 650–600Ma. Subsequently, rifting of the magmatic arc (c.f. the modern western Pacific) at c. 565Ma led to the formation of a small oceanic mar- ginal basin, evidenced by basaltic pillow lavas and tuffs of the Warren House Formation, and Kempsey Formation equivalents beneath the Worcester Graben.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Tectonics Review from Valerie Nulisch Some Questions (C) 2017 by TEKS Resource System
    Plate Tectonics Review from Valerie Nulisch Some questions (c) 2017 by TEKS Resource System. Some questions (c) 2017 by Region 10 Educational Service Center. Some questions (c) 2017 by Progress Testing. Page 2 GO ON A student wanted to make a model of the Earth. The student decided to cut a giant Styrofoam ball in half and paint the layers on it to show their thickness. 1 Which model below best represents the layers of the Earth? A B C D Page 3 GO ON 2 A student is building a model of the layers of the Earth. Which material would best represent the crust? F Grouping of magnetic balls G Styrofoam packing pellets H Bag of shredded paper J Thin layer of graham crackers 3 Your teacher has asked you to make a model of the interior of the Earth. In your model, how do the thicknesses of the lithosphere and crust compare? A The lithosphere is thinner than the crust. B The lithosphere is exactly the same thickness as the crust. C The lithosphere is thicker than the crust. D The lithosphere is thicker than the oceanic crust, but thinner than the continental crust. 4 Sequence the layers of the Earth in order from the exterior surface to the interior center. F Lithosphere, mantle, inner core, outer core, crust, asthenosphere G Inner core, outer core, mantle, asthenosphere, lithosphere, crust H Crust, mantle, outer core, inner core, asthenosphere, lithosphere J Crust, lithosphere, asthenosphere, mantle, outer core, inner core Page 4 GO ON 5 The tectonic plate labeled A in the diagram is the A Eurasian Plate B Indo-Australian Plate C Pacific Plate D African Plate Page 5 GO ON 6 The tectonic plate labeled B in the diagram is the — F Eurasian Plate G Indo-Australian Plate H Pacific Plate J North American Plate Page 6 GO ON Directions: The map below shows Earth's tectonic plates; six of them are numbered.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkatach Hypothesis: a New Model for the Evolution of the Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian Oceanic Domains
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Balkatach hypothesis: A new model for the evolution of the Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian oceanic domains 1,2 2 GEOSPHERE, v. 13, no. 5 Andrew V. Zuza and An Yin 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA doi:10.1130/GES01463.1 18 figures; 2 tables; 1 supplemental file ABSTRACT suturing. (5) The closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean in the early Permian was accompanied by a widespread magmatic flare up, which may have been CORRESPONDENCE: avz5818@gmail .com; The Phanerozoic history of the Paleo-Asian, Tethyan, and Pacific oceanic related to the avalanche of the subducted oceanic slabs of the Paleo-Asian azuza@unr .edu domains is important for unraveling the tectonic evolution of the Eurasian Ocean across the 660 km phase boundary in the mantle. (6) The closure of the and Laurentian continents. The validity of existing models that account for Paleo-Tethys against the southern margin of Balkatach proceeded diachro- CITATION: Zuza, A.V., and Yin, A., 2017, Balkatach hypothesis: A new model for the evolution of the the development and closure of the Paleo-Asian and Tethyan Oceans criti- nously, from west to east, in the Triassic–Jurassic. Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian oceanic domains: cally depends on the assumed initial configuration and relative positions of Geosphere, v. 13, no. 5, p. 1664–1712, doi:10.1130 the Precambrian cratons that separate the two oceanic domains, including /GES01463.1. the North China, Tarim, Karakum, Turan, and southern Baltica cratons.
    [Show full text]
  • Elbrus 5642M (South) - Russia
    Elbrus 5642m (South) - Russia & Damavand 5671m - Iran EXPEDITION OVERVIEW Mount Elbrus and Mount Damavand Combo In just two weeks this combo expedition takes you to the volcanoes of Damavand in Iran, which is Asia’s highest, and Elbrus in Russia, which is Europe’s highest. On Elbrus we gradually gain height and increase our chance of success by taking time to acclimatise in the Syltran-Su valley on Mount Mukal, which offers views across the beautiful valleys to Elbrus. Once acclimatised, we climb these sweeping snow slopes to the col between Elbrus’ twin summits before continuing easily to the true summit of Europe’s highest mountain in an ascent of about 1000m. A brief celebration and then we fly direct to Tehran where Mount Damavand may be little known outside its home nation of Iran but it is Asia’s highest volcano and provides a delightful challenge for mountaineers. It is located northeast of Tehran, close to the Caspian Sea and dominates the Alborz mountain range. Damavand is, with its near-symmetrical lines, a beautiful and graceful peak that has lain dormant for 10,000 years. On reaching the crater rim you walk around it to the true summit and it is possible to walk into the crater. It is technically easy but demands a good level of fitness. PLEASE NOTE – YOU WILL NEED TO BOOK THIS TRIP AT LEAST 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE DEPARTURE DATE, TO ALLOW TIME TO GET YOUR AUTHORISATION CODE AND VISA FOR IRAN. The Volcanic Seven Summits Challenge – your dream met, a worldwide journey to the seven continents with a unique challenge that has only been completed by a handful of people.
    [Show full text]
  • (COVID- 19) in Iran
    The epidemiological trends of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Iran: February 19 to March 22, 2020 Dr. Farzan Madadizadeh Research Center of Prevention and Epidemiology of Non-Communicable Disease, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Reyhane Sedkar ( [email protected] ) Department of Biostatistics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Research Article Keywords: Respiratory illness, Coronavirus disease 2019, Primary health care, Epidemiology Posted Date: May 18th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-29367/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/17 Abstract Background The Coronavirus has crossed the geographical borders of various countries without any restrictions. This study was performed to identify the epidemiological trends of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Iran during February 19 to March 22, 2020. Methods This cross sectional study was carried out in 31 provinces by using the daily number of newly infected cases which was announced by the Iranian health authorities from February 19 to March 22, 2020, we explore the trend of outbreak of coronavirus disease in all provinces of Iran and determine some inuential factors such as population size, area, population density, distance from original epicenter, altitude, and human development index (HDI) for each province on its spread by Spearman correlation coecient. K-means cluster analysis (KMCA) also categorized the provinces into 10 separate groups based on CF and ACF of the infected cases at the end of the study period. (ACF). Results There were 21,638 infected, 7,913 recovered and 2,299 death cases with COVID-19 in Iran during the study period.
    [Show full text]
  • Gondwana Large Igneous Provinces (Lips): Distribution, Diversity and Significance
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 Gondwana Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs): distribution, diversity and significance SARAJIT SENSARMA1*, BRYAN C. STOREY2 & VIVEK P. MALVIYA3 1Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226007, India 2Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand 324E Mayur Residency Extension, Faridi Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226016, India *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Gondwana, comprising >64% of the present-day continental mass, is home to 33% of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) and is key to unravelling the lithosphere–atmosphere system and related tectonics that mediated global climate shifts and sediment production conducive for life on Earth. Increased recognition of bimodal LIPs in Gondwana with significant, sometimes subequal, proportions of synchronous silicic volcanic rocks, mostly rhyolites to high silica rhyolites (±associ- ated granitoids) to mafic volcanic rocks is a major frontier, not considered in mantle plume or plate process hypotheses. On a δ18O v. initial 87Sr/86Sr plot for silicic rocks in Gondwana LIPs there is a remarkable spread between continental crust and mantle values, signifying variable contributions of crust and mantle in their origins. Caldera-forming silicic LIP events were as large as their mafic counterparts, and erupted for a longer duration (>20 myr). Several Gondwana LIPs erupted near the active continental margins, in addition to within-continents; rifting, however, continued even after LIP emplacements in several cases or was aborted and did not open into ocean by coeval com- pression. Gondwana LIPs had devastating consequences in global climate shifts and are major global sediment sources influencing upper continental crust compositions.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union of Geological Sciences Minutes
    INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES MINUTES of the 48th EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING FEBRUARY 24 – MARCH 2, 2001 HYDERABAD, INDIA IUGS Secretariat Geological Survey of Norway N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Fax: +47-73 50 22 30 E-mail: [email protected] 1 48th EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES FEBRUARY 24 – MARCH 2, 2001 HYDERABAD, INDIA AGENDA 0. WELCOMING ADDRESSES 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. 47TH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, AUGUST 11 & 14, 2000 a. Approval of Minutes b. Actions arising from these Minutes 3. ANNUAL ADMINISTRATIVE AFFAIRS a. President’s Report b. Past President’s Report c. Vice Presidents’ Reports d. Secretary General’s Report e. Treasurer’s Report f. IUGS National Committees g. Permanent Secretariat 4. ANNUAL REPORTS OF IUGS BODIES AND FUTURE PLANS a. Committees (former Advisory Boards) for Research Development, Publications, and Finances b. Commissions c. Working Groups, including Working Group on Public Affairs d. Affiliated Organizations 5. REPORTS ON CO-OPERATIVE ENTERPRISES a.IUGS/UNESCO International Geological Correlation Programme (IGCP) b. IUGS/UNESCO Programme on Geol. Application on Remote Sensing (GARS) c. IUGS/UNESCO Deposit Modelling Programme (DMP) d. Proposed IUGS/UNESCO Programme on Landslides 2 6. INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGICAL CONGRESS (IGC) a. 31st IGC b. 32nd IGC c. 33rd IGC 7. INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCES UNIONS (ICSU) a. Relations with ICSU b. ICSU General Assembly c. ICSU Committees and IUGS Representatives d. Relations with other Unions of the ICSU Family e. ICSU Grants 8. IUGS POLICY AND STRATEGY MATTERS a. IUGS Statutes b. IUGS Nominating Committee c. IUGS Strategic Action Plan c.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic 3: Alabama in the Paleozoic
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA GY 112: Earth History Paleozoic 3: Alabama in the Paleozoic Instructor: Dr. Douglas W. Haywick Last Time The Paleozoic Part 2 1) Back to Newfoundland 2) Eastern Laurentian Orogenies (Appalachians) 3) Other Laurentian Orogenies (Antler, Ouachita) (web notes 25) Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Even though this coastline of Laurentia was a passive continental margin, a plate tectonic boundary was rapidly approaching… A B A B Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The resulting Taconic Orogeny first depressed the seafloor Laurentia (localized transgression) and A Island arc then pushed previously deposited passive continental B margin sediments up into thrust fault mountains. Baltica There was only minimal metamorphism and igneous A intrusions. B Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Laurentia Baltica Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Laurentia Baltica Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The next tectonic event (the Acadian Orogeny) was caused Laurentia by the approach of Baltica A B Baltica A B Baltica Baltica Late Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The Acadian Orogeny was more extensive and more intense (metamorphism and A lots of igneous intrusions) B A B Early Devonian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The Acadian Orogeny was more extensive and more intense (metamorphism and lots of igneous intrusions) Early Devonian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea. A B B A B Mississippian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea. A B B A B Pennsylvannian Suture zone Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea.
    [Show full text]