A RESOLUTION Recognizing the 25Th Anniversary of the Independence of Azerbaijan. WHEREAS, on January 19-20, 1990, Soviet Special

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

A RESOLUTION Recognizing the 25Th Anniversary of the Independence of Azerbaijan. WHEREAS, on January 19-20, 1990, Soviet Special

UNOFFICIAL COPY AS OF 01/20/16 16 REG. SESS. 16 RS BR 1328 A RESOLUTION recognizing the 25th anniversary of the independence of Azerbaijan. WHEREAS, on January 19-20, 1990, Soviet special troops stormed Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan; and WHEREAS, this invasion was indiscriminate and brutal, killing 133 unarmed civilians and wounding 611 more; and WHEREAS, this uprising became known as Black January. Following the massacre, an investigation conducted by Human Rights Watch found evidence that Soviet troops acted without justification against the citizens of Azerbaijan, firing on ambulances, using armored vehicles and weapons meant for high-tech warfare, and using expanding bullets prohibited by the 1899 Hague Convention to kill women, children, and the elderly; and WHEREAS, in response to Black January, the people of Azerbaijan became dedicated to restoring their independence, which it accomplished in October 1991; and WHEREAS, it is rightful that this honorable body observe the struggle for independence and liberty of our brothers and sisters around the world. In this spirit, the members of this chamber honor the 25th anniversary of the independence of Azerbaijan, and also take time to dutifully reflect upon the profound sacrifices of all those who died during Black January in 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, Be it resolved by the Senate of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: Section 1. The members of the Senate hereby acknowledge the sacrifices of those who died during Black January in 1990. Section 2. The Senate recognizes the 25th anniversary of the independence of Azerbaijan. Section 3. The Clerk of the Senate is directed to transmit a copy of this Page 1 of 2 BR132800.100 - 1328 - 2602 Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY AS OF 01/20/16 16 REG. SESS. 16 RS BR 1328 Resolution to Senator Mike Wilson. Page 2 of 2 BR132800.100 - 1328 - 2602 Jacketed .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

3. Energy Reserves, Pipeline Routes and the Legal Regime in the Caspian Sea
3. Energy reserves, pipeline routes and the legal regime in the Caspian Sea John Roberts I. The energy reserves and production potential of the Caspian The issue of Caspian energy development has been dominated by four factors. The first is uncertain oil prices. These pose a challenge both to oilfield devel- opers and to the promoters of pipelines. The boom prices of 2000, coupled with supply shortages within the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), have made development of the resources of the Caspian area very attractive. By contrast, when oil prices hovered around the $10 per barrel level in late 1998 and early 1999, the price downturn threatened not only the viability of some of the more grandiose pipeline projects to carry Caspian oil to the outside world, but also the economics of basic oilfield exploration in the region. While there will be some fly-by-night operators who endeavour to secure swift returns in an era of high prices, the major energy developers, as well as the majority of smaller investors, will continue to predicate total production costs (including carriage to market) not exceeding $10–12 a barrel. The second is the geology and geography of the area. The importance of its geology was highlighted when two of the first four international consortia formed to look for oil in blocks off Azerbaijan where no wells had previously been drilled pulled out in the wake of poor results.1 The geography of the area involves the complex problem of export pipeline development and the chicken- and-egg question whether lack of pipelines is holding back oil and gas pro- duction or vice versa.
[Show full text]
Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
[Show full text]
Country Profile – Azerbaijan
Country profile – Azerbaijan Version 2008 Recommended citation: FAO. 2008. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Azerbaijan. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
[Show full text]
History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
[Show full text]
Armenia-Azerbaijan Wars: Looking for Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
Armenia‐Azerbaijan Wars: Looking for Nagorno‐Karabakh Conflict Resolution Air University Advanced Research Program Next Generation Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance Aigerim T. Akhmetova Squadron Officer School Class – 21C March 31, 2021 "Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency." Abstract The Nagorno‐Karabakh territorial dispute is one of the longest inter‐ethnic conflicts from the former Soviet Union, devastating Azerbaijan and Armenia since 1988. The geographic location complicates the situation from a geopolitical perspective by bringing several outside stakeholders to the discussion table. The efforts of one key organization to mitigate the conflict, the Minsk Group, have been questioned by both Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Minsk Group was established in 1992 to provide a peaceful resolution to this territorial dispute by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Competing regional and international interests further complicate this stalemate and finding a single resolution that fits all involved parties’ interests has been an arduous path. This paper explores the complexities of this conflict, discusses if Minsk Group should continue leading negotiation efforts, and proposes possible courses of actions for the international community to take with these countries. Background and Involved Parties The inter‐ethnic tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the Karabakh region can be traced back to the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union era (Migdalovitz 2001, 6). For a brief period in 1921, Nagorno‐Karabakh (NK) was part of Armenia before Stalin acknowledged their ties to Azerbaijan (ibid).
[Show full text]
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E221 HON
February 26, 2018 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E221 In recent years, the Urban League of Great- 131 fatalities, over 600 injuries, 841 arrests Through his excellent leadership, Mark has er Madison has been at the forefront of fight- where detainees were subject to torture, and been an invaluable resource to the Granite ing for equality in our community with its vision to this day an unknown number are still miss- State and improved the lives of thousands to make Greater Madison the ‘‘Best in the ing. These horrific acts did not have their de- who have relied on projects championed by Midwest’’ for everyone to live, learn, and work sired effect in the slightest on Azerbaijan who the Commission. by 2020. Last year, the organization launched won independence less than two years later. On behalf of my constituents in New Hamp- a campaign to place 1,500 low-income job The second occurred on this day, February shire’s Second Congressional District, I thank seekers into career pathway employment by 26, twenty-six years ago in the city of Khojaly Mark for his many years of dedicated service 2020, continuing its long legacy of advocating where several thousand ethnic Azerbaijani to the Granite State and the Northeast. His for economic justice and opportunity. people were trapped in a blockade by Arme- achievements will continue to benefit our state Through its efforts to pursue education, em- nian troops seeking to lay claim to the for years to come. I am honored to recognize ployment, and empowerment, the Urban Nagorno-Karabakh region.
[Show full text]
Key Considerations for Returns to Nagorno-Karabakh and the Adjacent Districts November 2020
Key Considerations for Returns to Nagorno-Karabakh and the Adjacent Districts November 2020 With the latest developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) region and seven adjacent districts, the issue of return of persons originating from these areas (IDPs and refugees1), who were displaced in the past and most recent conflicts, has emerged as a new core issue that is also specifically mentioned, along with UNHCR’s supervisory role in this regard, in the statement on cessation of hostilities issued by the parties on 9 November 2020 under the auspices of the Russian Federation.2 Regarding specifically the return of IDPs from Azerbaijan, according to different sources, the Azeri authorities developed in 2005 broad elements of an IDP return concept, together with international agencies, which emphasizes the principle of voluntary returns in dignity and safety.3 No such plan exists for the return of refugees and persons in a refugee-like situation in Armenia, as the displacement of the Armenian population from NK only took place recently. It is also to note that the recent developments in NK do not open the possibility for the return of ethnic Armenian refugees and former refugees, who were displaced in the early 1990s from Baku, Sumgait and other parts of Azerbaijan, nor for the return of ethnic Azeris who left Armenia proper and settled in Azerbaijan and were since naturalized. The purpose of this note is to spell out the basic parameters to be considered under international law for these returns with a view to inform UNHCR and the UN’s possible support and assistance role.
[Show full text]
Soviet Crackdown
CONFLICT IN THE SOVIET UNION Black January in Azerbaidzhan Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) The InterInter----RepublicRepublic Memorial Society CONFLICT IN THE SOVIET UNION Black January in Azerbaidzhan Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) The InterInter----RepublicRepublic Memorial Society Human Rights Watch New York $$$ Washington $$$ Los Angeles $$$ London Copyright (c) May 1991 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 1-56432-027-8 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 91-72672 Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) Human Rights Watch/Helsinki was established in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. It is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria. Jeri Laber is the executive director; Lois Whitman is the deputy director; Holly Cartner and Julie Mertus are counsel; Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Ivana Nizich and Christopher Panico are research associates; Christina Derry, Ivan Lupis, Alexander Petrov and Isabelle Tin-Aung are associates; ðeljka MarkiÉ and Vlatka MiheliÉ are consultants. Jonathan Fanton is the chair of the advisory committee and Alice Henkin is vice chair. International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights Helsinki Watch is an affiliate of the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, a human rights organization that links Helsinki Committees in the following countries of Europe and North America: Austria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, England, the Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, the Soviet Union, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United States, Yugoslavia.
[Show full text]
ICS-Georgia UNCLASS-508.Pdf
Integrated Country Strategy Georgia FOR PUBLIC RELEASE FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Table of Contents 1. Chief of Mission Priorities 2 2. Mission Strategic Framework 4 3. Mission Goals and Objectives 5 4. Management Objectives 12 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Approved: September 28, 2018 1 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 1. Chief of Mission Priorities The overarching goal of the U.S. Mission in Georgia is to anchor Georgia more firmly as the United States’ most reliable partner in a strategically critical region. A strong, democratic Georgia that is integrated into Western political and economic structures will stand staunchly by the United States in addressing global security challenges and will promote economic prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic. Recognizing that Georgia remains one of the largest, most reliable troop contributors to the NATO mission in Afghanistan and coalition operations elsewhere, we will continue to support Georgia on its path to NATO membership, in line with Allies’ 2008 Bucharest Summit declaration. We will also assist Georgia in strengthening its territorial defense capabilities and further develop its interoperability with U.S. and NATO forces. We will continue to build Georgia's capacity to address regional and transnational threats like violent extremism, trafficking in persons and narcotics, proliferation of nuclear materials, and biosecurity threats. We will firmly support Georgia's territorial integrity and sovereignty and push for full implementation of the 2008 ceasefire agreement by Russia. At the same time, we will support Georgia's peaceful, pragmatic engagement with Russia through the Geneva International Discussions, as well as Georgia's efforts to promote reconciliation and engagement with the occupied territories of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
[Show full text]
The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan
Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien No. 107 – March 2010 The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study By Andreas Heinrich Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen Klagenfurter Straße 3, 28359 Bremen, Germany phone +49 421 218-69601, fax +49 421 218-69607 http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Arbeitspapiere und Materialien – Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen No. 107: Andreas Heinrich The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study March 2010 ISSN: 1616-7384 About the author: Andreas Heinrich is a researcher at the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen. This working paper has been produced within the research project ‘The Energy Sector and the Political Stability of Regimes in the Caspian Area: A Comparison of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan’, which is being conducted by the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen from April 2009 until April 2011 with financial support from the Volkswagen Foundation. Language editing: Hilary Abuhove Style editing: Judith Janiszewski Layout: Matthias Neumann Cover based on a work of art by Nicholas Bodde Opinions expressed in publications of the Research Centre for East European Studies are solely those of the authors. This publication may not be reprinted or otherwise reproduced—entirely or in part—without prior consent of the Research Centre for East European Studies or without giving credit to author and source. © 2010 by Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Publikationsreferat Klagenfurter Str. 3 28359 Bremen – Germany phone: +49 421 218-69601 fax: +49 421 218-69607 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................5 1.
[Show full text]
General Assembly Security Council Seventy-Fourth Session Seventy-Fifth Year Agenda Item 31 Prevention of Armed Conflict
United Nations A/74/771–S/2020/242 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 March 2020 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-fourth session Seventy-fifth year Agenda item 31 Prevention of armed conflict Letter dated 27 March 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to enclose herewith the memorandum of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) in response to the distortion of facts by Azerbaijan about the events that took place in Kho jalu in February 1992. I kindly request that the present letter and its annex be circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 31, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Mher Margaryan Ambassador Permanent Representative 20-04690 (E) 010420 *2004690* A/74/771 S/2020/242 Annex to the letter dated 27 March 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Memorandum of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh In response to the repeated distortion of facts by Azerbaijan about the Khojalu events in February 1992, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh would like to communicate the following: The actions of the defense forces of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic (Republic of Artsakh) aimed at neutralizing the shelling and firing positions of the Azerbaijani armed forces located in Khojalu, as well as at liberating the Stepanakert airport, were in line with the norms and principles of international humanitarian law.
[Show full text]
Azerbaijan “On Status of Refugees and Forcibly Displaced (Persons Displaced Within the Country) Persons”
Unofficial translation LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN “ON STATUS OF REFUGEES AND FORCIBLY DISPLACED (PERSONS DISPLACED WITHIN THE COUNTRY) PERSONS” CHAPTER I GENERAL PRINCIPLES Article 1. Basic concepts used in this Law. The basic concepts used in this Law have the following meanings: The term “Refugee” shall apply to person who owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it. The term Forcibly Displaced Person (FDP) (person displaced within the country) shall apply to any person who has moved to another place being forced to leave his/her permanent residence within the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan in connection with military aggression, natural or technological disaster. The FDP status can be granted according to decision of appropriate executive authority to the citizen of the Republic of Azerbaijan, being forced to leave the place of the permanent residence in the other country and came to the Republic of Azerbaijan by the reasons, indicated in part 1 of this Article. Article 2. Conditions when status of refugee is not granted. The status of refugee is not granted to the following persons: • If the person committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity and mankind as defined in the international law; • If the person committed a serious non-political crime outside of the Republic of Azerbaijan prior to his/her arrival in the territory of Azerbaijan; • If the person is considered guilty in making the actions, which contradict to the purposes and principles of United Nation.
[Show full text]