Gazelle Exploitation at Urkan E-Rubb Iia, Jordan Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gazelle Exploitation at Urkan E-Rubb Iia, Jordan Valley Hunting Specialisation and the Broad Spectrum Revolution in the Early Epipalaeolithic: Gazelle Exploitation at Urkan e-Rubb IIa, Jordan Valley by Emma Suzanne Humphrey A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by Emma Suzanne Humphrey 2012 Hunting Specialisation and the Broad Spectrum Revolution in the Early Epipalaeolithic: Gazelle Exploitation at Urkan e-Rub IIa, Jordan Valley Emma Suzanne Humphrey Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto 2012 Abstract This present research explores the impact of Flannery’s (1969) Broad Spectrum Revolution model within the context of the Levantine Epipalaeolithic, specifically the early (Kebaran) Epipalaeolithic. This model attempts to explain changes in subsistence behaviour associated with the end of the Pleistocene leading up to the development of agriculture. The Jordan valley represents an ideal model for Flannery’s marginal habitat because of the range of different flora and fauna required more intensive resource exploitation strategies. The discussion here focuses on the zooarchaeological and taphonomic analysis of two faunal assemblages (representing two sub-horizons) from Urkan e-Rubb IIa, a Kebaran site located in the lower Jordan Valley, and excavated by E. Hovers (Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University Jerusalem), in 1986 and 1988. This site shows evidence of specialised gazelle hunting and processing. Initial interpretations of the site argued for a multi-purpose residential base camp, supported by lithic tool and shell bead manufacturing. ii Recent discussions of Epipalaeolithic diet breadth have concentrated on the end of the Pleistocene (Munro 2001, 2003, 2004, 2009; Stiner 2001; Stiner & Munro 2002; Stiner et al. 1999, 2000; Stutz et al. 2009) and have been directed towards explaining changing subsistence patterns towards the end of the Epipalaeolithic (i.e. the Natufian), where an increased use of wild cereals and small game has been well documented. The view that it is not until the Natufian that broad spectrum resource strategies were used is questioned here. Major questions that are addressed with this research include: What do the faunal assemblages from Urkan e-Rubb IIa tell us about Kebaran subisistence behaviour? Do broad spectrum models help to shed light on subsistence adaptations at the end of the Last Glacial Maximum? What can recent analyses of Jordan Valley faunal assemblages contribute to the discussion? These are addressed through a detailed zooarchaeological and taphonomic analysis of the Urkan e-Rubb IIa fauana, followed by synchronic and diachronic analyses of Levantine Epipalaeolithic assemblages, through a combination of taxonomy-based diversity indices and prey-ranking indices. iii Acknowledgments To begin, I would like to thank my core committee, Dr. Michael Chazan, Dr. T. Maxwell Friesen, and Dr. Genevieve Dewar, for their continued support and advice, without which this research would not have been possible. I would also like to thank Dr. E.B.Banning and Dr. Ariane Burke for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. Your support and encouragement are greatly appreciated. A special thank you to Dr. Erella Hovers, Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University Jerusalem, for allowing me to access and base my dissertation on the material from her excavations. I appreciate your trust in me. Thank you to Dr. Liora Kolska Horwitz, for your guidance and suggestions on how to approach the faunal material from Urkan e-Rubb IIa, and for sharing your incredible experience and knowledge on the subject. Thank you also to Dr. Rivka Rabinovich, both in your capacity as the curator of the Zoology Laboratory, Department of Systematics, Evolution, and Ecology, Hebrew University Jerusalem, where the fauna from Urkan e-Rubb IIa is stored, as well as for being a helpful colleague and friend. You welcomed me both into the lab ‘family’ and into your home, helping this lonely Canadian feel less alone in a foreign land (even if you always did make me dress up for Purim!). Thank you to Dr. Haskel Greenfield and Tina Greenfield, for very helpful comments while we sat at our respective work tables in the zoology lab in Israel, as well as for advice and suggestions for approaching my data. I would like to give very grateful appreciation to Andrea and Charles Bronfman for their generous financial support (through the Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies). Without your support in 2006, 2007 and 2009, this research would not have been possible. Thank you also to The University of Toronto Fellowship for their partial funding of my graduate studies. I would also like to thank the Kenyan Institute and its staff, the Jerusalem branch of the Council for British Research in the Levant. You were my home-away-from-home for months at a time. Despite the eccentricities of the place, the staff and other visitors often helped me stay sane. iv A very large ‘thank you’ to Peter Bikoulis for help with my maps. I only wish we could have made all of your mapping ideas work! As well, thank you to Danielle MacDonald for help with digging up mapping coordinates for some of the pesky sites mentioned in the text, and Dr. Jennifer Campbell for help with constructing many of my images. I want to thank my friends who have supported me over the years, while I have been working on this project. We have whined, moaned, supported and cheered each other along, and I couldn’t have done this without you. I dedicate this to my father, and in loving memory, to my mother. Dad, you have encouraged my interest in archaeology since I was in the 6th grade, and you’ve always been ready to talk about new archaeological and palaeoanthropological discoveries. Mum, you always believed in me, no matter what I chose to do with my life. I love you both so much. v Table of Contents Abstract ………………………………..………………………………………………………….ii Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………………….iv Table of Contents …………………………………………..………………………………….…vi List of Tables ………………………..…………………………………………………………...ix List of Figures ……………………………..…………………………………………………....xiii List of Appendices ………………………………..…………………………………………...xviii Chapter 1 Introduction …………………………………..………………………………………..1 1.1 Current Paradigm in Epipalaeolithic Faunal Research ……………………………………….1 1.1.1 The Broad Spectrum Revolution Model …...……….…………………….………1 1.1.2 Recent Discussion of the BSR Model ………...…………………………...….......6 1.2 Broad Spectrum Diets and the Kebaran …………………………………………………..9 1.3 Dissertation Structure ……………………………………………………………………13 Chapter 2 Environment and Cultural Context of Levantine Epipalaeolithic ……………....…....15 2.1 Terrain and Palaeoenvironment …………………………………………………………15 2.1.1 Palaeoclimate……...……………………………………………………………..18 2.1.1.1 Pollen …………………………………………………………………...23 2.1.1.2 Speleothem Deposits ……………………………………………………25 2.1.1.3 Lake Lisan ………………………………………………………………28 2.2 Epipalaeolithic Culture History …………………………………………………………31 2.2.1 Early Epipalaeolithic (23,000 to 17,500 cal. years BP) ………...……………….31 2.2.1.1 Masraqan ………………………………………………………………..33 2.2.1.2 Qalkhan …………………………………………………………………33 2.2.1.3 Nebekian ………………………………………………………………..34 2.2.1.4 Kebaran …………………………………………………………………34 2.2.1.5 Nizzanian ……………………………………………………………….36 2.2.2 Middle Epipalaeolithic (17,500 to 14,600 cal. years BP) ……………..…….…..37 2.2.2.1 Geometric Kebaran ……………………………………………………..37 2.2.2.1 Mushabian ……………………………………………………....………39 2.2.3 Later Epipalaeolithic (14,600 to 11,600 cal. years BP) …………………………41 2.2.3.1 Ramonian ……………………………………………………………….41 2.2.3.2 Natufian …………………………………………………………………42 2.2.3.3 Harifian …………………………………………………………………43 Chapter 3 Upper Jordan Valley ………………………………………………………………….45 3.1 Jordan Valley Geology and Environment …………………………………...…………..45 3.2 Urkan e-Rubb IIa ……………………………………………………………………….48 3.2.1 Site Stratigraphy …………………………………………….…………..............50 3.2.2 Excavation Description ………...…………………………………………….....50 3.2.3 Artefacts and Dating …………………………………………...………………..53 3.3 Northern Jordan Valley Kebaran Sites ……………………………………...…………..63 3.3.1 Ohalo II ………...………………………………………………………………..63 3.3.2 Ein Gev I………...…………………………………………………………….…67 3.4 Wadi Fazael ………………………………...…………………………………………...69 3.5 Summary …………………………………...……………………………………………71 vi Chapter 4 Zooarchaeological and Taphonomic Methodology …….. ……………………………74 4.1 Taxonomic Identification and Bone Recording ………………………….……………...74 4.2 Quantification …………………………………………………………………………...77 4.3 Bone Density …………………………………………………………………………….80 4.4 Diagenetic Processes and Bone Preservation …………………………………………...82 4.4.1 Fragmentation …………………………………………………………………...82 4.4.2 NISP : MNE Ratios ……………………………………………………………...83 4.4.3 Bone-Based versus Tooth-Based MNI Ratios …………………………………..84 4.4.4 Tarsal and Carpal Survivorship …………………………………………………84 4.4.5 Proximal/Distal Humerus and Tibia ………………………………….…………85 4.5 Carnivore Modification ………………………………………………………………….86 4.6 Shaft Circumference and Shaft Length ………………………………………………….86 4.7 Natural Attrition …………………………………………………………………………87 4.7.1 Fluvial Transport ………………………………………………………………...87 4.7.2 Weathering and Root Damage ……………………………………………..........88 4.8 NISP : MNE Ratios and Marrow Weight ……………………………………………….89 4.9 Fracture Patterns: Angle, Outline, and Texture …………………………………………90 4.10 Cut Marks ………………………………………………………………………………..91 4.11 Burning ………………………………………………………………………………….93 4.12 Species Demographics Area A ………………………………………………………….94 4.12.1 Age Profiles: Epiphyseal Fusion and Tooth
Recommended publications
  • Yeroshevich Et Al.Design
    Design and Performance of Microlith Implemented Projectiles During the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: Experimental and Archaeological Evidence The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Yaroshevich Alla, Daniel Kaufman , Dnitri Nuzhnyy, Ofer Bar- Yosef, and Mina Weinstein-Evron. 2010. Design and performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the middle and the late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: Experimental and archaeological evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(2): 368-388. Published Version doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.050 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4270545 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP 1 Design and Performance of Microlith Implemented Projectiles During the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: Experimental and Archaeological Evidence Alla Yaroshevich 1,2, Daniel Kaufman3, Dmitri Nuzhnyy4, Ofer Bar-Yosef5, Mina Weinstein-Evron3 1 University of Haifa, Department of Archaeology, Israel 2 Israel Antiquities Authority 3 Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Israel 4 Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Science, Kiev, Ukraine 5 Harvard University, Department of Anthropology, Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology, USA Abstract The study comprises an experimentally based investigation of interaction between temporal change in the morphology of microlithic tools and transformations in projectile technology during the Late Pleistocene in the Levant.
    [Show full text]
  • New Version of the Theory of Unique and Recent Origin of Modern Man
    13 International Journal of Modern Anthropology Int. J. Mod. Anthrop. (2014) 7: 13 - 42 ailable online at: www.ata.org.tn DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijma.v1i7.1 Original Synthesis Article Recent out of Yemen: new version of the theory of unique and recent origin of modern man Hassen Chaabani Hassen Chaabani was born the 07 / 09 / 1947 in Tunis (Tunisia). He is Full Professor and research unit Director at Monastir University. He is the Founder and the President of the Tunisian Association of Anthropology. He is the Founder and the Editor of the International Journal of Modern Anthropology. Specialist in Human Genetics, Biological Anthropology and some cultural and religious subjects, he wrote dozens of academic articles and two books. In 2014, he was awarded the honorary title of Professor Emeritus. University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy, 5000 Monastir, Tunisia. Abstract - It is generally accepted that the human evolutionary history was started in sub-Saharan Africa by the emergence of first individuals belonging to our genus Homo. But details of this evolution, particularly those of its last stage relating to the modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) emergence, represent until now a controversial topic. Confusion and imprecision associated with certain concepts and definitions have accentuated this controversy and therefore helped to curb the progress of the research in this topic. In this paper I present these problems before presenting a new detailed version of the theory of unique and recent origin of modern man. This version designated “Recent out of Yemen” thesis represents a refined grand synthesis in which my advanced hypotheses are brought together with new additional details.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcing Epi-Palaeolithic to Chalcolithic
    Marginal Perspectives: Sourcing Epi-Palaeolithic to Chalcolithic Obsidian from the Öküzini Cave (SW Turkey) Tristan Carter, François-Xavier Le Bourdonnec, Metin Kartal, Gérard Poupeau, Thomas Calligaro, Philippe Moretto To cite this version: Tristan Carter, François-Xavier Le Bourdonnec, Metin Kartal, Gérard Poupeau, Thomas Calligaro, et al.. Marginal Perspectives: Sourcing Epi-Palaeolithic to Chalcolithic Obsidian from the Öküzini Cave (SW Turkey). Paléorient, CNRS, 2011, 37 (2), pp.123 - 149. 10.3406/paleo.2011.5427. hal-01743167 HAL Id: hal-01743167 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01743167 Submitted on 21 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PART À MARGINAL PERSPECTIVES: SOURCING TIRÉS - EPI-PALAEOLITHIC TO CHALCOLITHIC OBSIDIAN FROM THE ÖKÜZINI CAV E ÉDITIONS (SW TURKEY) CNRS • T. CARTER, F.-X. LE BOURDONNEC, M. KARTAL, G. POUPEAU, T. CALLIGARO PART À and P. MORETTO TIRÉS - Abstract: Fifty-six pieces of obsidian from the Öküzini Cave in SW Anatolia were elementally characterised using particle induced X-ray emission [PIXE], the artefacts coming from strata that span the early Epi-Palaeolithic to Late Chalcolithic. The obsidian comes from two sources in southern Cappadocia, East Göllü Dağ and Nenezi Dağ (380 km distant), representing the earliest evidence for these sources’ use at distance.
    [Show full text]
  • References 393
    references 393 REFERENCES Abed, A.M. the Mountain Gazelle Gazella gazella gazella. Israel 1985a Paleoclimates of the Upper Pleistocene in the Journal of Zoology 23: 39-44. Jordan Rift. Studies in the History and Archaeol- Bahn, P. ogy of Jordan II, pp. 81-93. Amman: Department 1978 The ‘unacceptable face’ of the West European of Antiquities of Jordan. Upper Palaeolithic. Antiquity 52/206: 183–192. Abed, A.M. Bamforth, D.B. 1985b Geology of the Damya Formation. Dirasat 12/2: 1988 Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests: 99-108. the Institute results in context. Journal of Archaeo- Adams, J.L. logical Science 15: 11-23. 1988 Use-wear analyses on manos and hide-processing Bamforth, D.B., G.R. Burns and C. Woodman stones. Journal of Field Archaeology 15/3: 307-315. 1990 Ambiguous traces and blind test results: new data. Akoshima, K. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 413-430. 1983 Microflaking quantification. In G. de Sieveking and Bar-El, T. and E. Tchernov M.H. Newcomer (eds), The Human Uses of Flint 2001 Lagomorph remains at Prehistoric sites in Israel and Chert, pp. 71-79. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- and Southern Sinai. Paléorient 26: 93-109. versity Press. Bar-Gal, G.K., P. Ducos and L.K. Horwitz Al-Eisawi, D.M. 2003 The application of ancient DNA analysis to iden- 1985 Vegetation in Jordan. In A. Hadidi (ed.), Studies in tify neolithic caprinae: a case study from the site of the History and Archaeology of Jordan II, pp. 45-57. Amman: Department of Antiquities of Jordan. Hatoula, Israel. International Journal of Osteoar- Alley, R.B., D.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Fields and Pastures New Papers Presented in Honor of Andrew M.T
    Chazan (eds) Chazan & Lillios Fresh Fields and Pastures New PAPERS PRESENTED IN HONOR OF ANDREW M.T. MOORE Fresh Fields and and Fields Fresh Fresh Fields and Pastures New New Pastures This volume honors the career and contributions of Andrew M.T. Moore. Moore’s groundbreaking work at Abu Hureyra, Syria and excavations at Neolithic sites in Croatia have made him a pioneer in integrated interdisciplinary research in archaeology, expressing a deeply held conviction that developments in human culture can only be understood when embedded in an ecological approach. of of in Honor Presented Papers In this book, colleagues and former students of Moore, working in the Near East and A ndrew M. ndrew Croatia, present current research, illustrating the continuing impact of Moore’s work on the early farming and herding peoples of the eastern Mediterranean. T . Moore edited by Sidestone ISidestoneSBN 978-90-8890-348-9 Press Katina T. Lillios & Michael Chazan ISBN: 978-90-8890-348-9 9 789088 903489 This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: Fresh Fields and Pastures New Sidestone Press Fresh Fields and Pastures New PAPERS PRESENTED IN HONOR OF ANDREW M.T. MOORE edited by Katina T. Lillios & Michael Chazan © 2016 individual authors Published by Sidestone Press, Leiden www.sidestone.com ISBN 978-90-8890-348-9 Lay-out & cover design: Sidestone Press Photographs cover: Also available as: e-book (PDF): ISBN 978-90-8890-349-6 Contents Preface 7 Michael Chazan & Katina T.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Turnover in the Azraq Basin, Eastern Jordan 28,000 to 9,000 Cal BP, Signalling Climate Change and Human Impact
    *Manuscript Click here to view linked References For submission to Quaternary Research Pages 1 Faunal turnover in the Azraq Basin, eastern Jordan 28,000 to 9,000 cal BP, signalling climate change and human impact Louise Martina, b, c, Yvonne H. Edwardsa, Joe Roea, Andrew Garrarda aInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, Gordon Square London WC1H 0PY: bcorresponding author: [email protected] Page 2 Abstract Recent zooarchaeological analyses of game exploitation in the Epipalaeolithic of the Southern Levant identify a decline in large game in the Natufian, with corresponding increase in small prey, interpreted as hunting pressure driven by population expansion. To date, studies focus on the Mediterranean zone. This paper adopts similar approaches to examine Epipalaeolithic to Neolithic faunal data from 16 sites in the steppic Jordanian Azraq Basin. Results here reveal very different trends. Large game, mainly equids, fluctuate throughout the Epipalaeolithic, due to climatic conditions and available water/vegetation. Cattle thrive in the Azraq oasis, showing no decline in the Late Epipalaeolithic. Gazelle exploitation is predominant and sustainable throughout the Epipalaeolithic, even at Kharaneh IV and Wadi Jilat 6 ‘megasites’. However, PPNB assemblages from the limestone steppe show intensive game exploitation resulting from longer-stay settlement. The focused gazelle-hunting camp at Dhuweila in the Basalt desert also shows pressure from indiscriminate culling impacting herd demography, interpreted as providing meat for onwards exchange. Human impacts on steppe fauna appear both local and in many cases short-term, unlike the large-game suppression reported from west of the Rift Valley. Resource pressures and game over-kill, whether population-driven or otherwise, are not currently apparent east of the Jordan River.
    [Show full text]
  • Natufian Culture in the Levant, Threshold to the Origins Of
    Evolutionary Anthropology 159 ARTICLES The Natufian Culture in the Levant, Threshold to the Origins of Agriculture OFER BAR-YOSEF The aim of this paper is to provide the reader with an updated description of the sites, together with this reconstruc- archeological evidence for the origins of agriculture in the Near East. Specifically, I tion of natural resources, allow us to will address the question of why the emergence of farming communities in the Near answer the questions of when and East was an inevitable outcome of a series of social and economic circumstances where the Neolithic Revolution oc- that caused the Natufian culture to be considered the threshold for this major curred. However, we are still far from evolutionary change.1–4 The importance of such an understanding has global providing a definitive answer to the implications. Currently, updated archeological information points to two other question of why it occurred. centers of early cultivation, central Mexico and the middle Yangtze River in China, Within the large region of the Near that led to the emergence of complex civilizations.4 However, the best-recorded East, recent archeological work has sequence from foraging to farming is found in the Near East. Its presence warns demonstrated the importance of the against the approach of viewing all three evolutionary sequences as identical in area known as the Mediterranean Le- terms of primary conditions, economic and social motivations and activities, and the vant. Today it is one of the most re- resulting cultural, social, and ideological changes. searched parts of the Near East.1–4,9–18 It is therefore possible that the picture I will draw is somewhat biased due to As with other crucial thresholds in marked a major organizational depar- the limited number of excavations else- cultural evolution, the impact of the ture from the old ways of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Aswa6-04-Bar-Oz-And
    ARCHAEOZOOLOGY OF THE NEAR EAST VI Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the archaeozoology of southwestern Asia and adjacent areas edited by H. Buitenhuis, A.M. Choyke, L. Martin, L. Bartosiewicz and M. Mashkour ARC-Publicaties 123 Groningen, The Netherlands, 2005 Cover illustration by Chris Mosseri-Marlio This publication is sponsored by: ARC-bv and Vledderhuizen Beheer bv Copyright: ARC-bv Parts of this publication can be used by third parties if source is clearly stated Information and sales: ARC-bv, Koningsweg 48, Postbus 41018, 9701CA Groningen, The Nether- lands, Tel: +31 (0)50 3687100, fax: +31 (0)50 3687 199, email: [email protected], internet: www.arcbv.nl ISBN 90-77170-02-2 Prof.Dr. Eitan Tchernov This volume is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Dr. Eitan Tchernov, in fond memory of his enthusiasm and support to many in the field of archaeozoology. Preface The ASWA VI meeting was held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, from 30th August-1st September 2002, timetabled to follow on the heels of the ICAZ meeting in Durham, UK. Over 55 participants attended the meeting, travelling from 13 countries, bringing the latest re- search results from our field. As usual, it was a pleasure to see so many doctoral students presenting their research – a sign for a very healthy future for zooarchaeology in south west Asia. It is still un- fortunate, however, that colleagues from some Middle Eastern countries were unable to attend due to financial and political constraints. Presentations were organized into the following six themes, which highlight the scope of the ASWA membership: Animals in Palaeolithic and Epipalaeolithic Levant; Neolithic Patterns of Animal Use; Animals in Neolithic Anatolia; Animals in the Chalcolithic and Bronze Ages; Iron Age, Nabatean and Roman Patterns of Animal Use; Animals in Ancient Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Archaeology and the Origins of Seafaring in the Eastern Mediterranean
    An offprint from ISLAND ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE ORIGINS OF SEAFARING IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN Proceedings of the Wenner Gren Workshop held at Reggio Calabria on October 19-21, 2012 In memory of John D. Evans Eurasian Prehistory Guest Editors: Albert J. Ammerman and Thomas Davis PART ONE (Eurasian Prehistory 10/2013) Introduction 1. Introduction Albert J. Ammerman 2. Chronological framework Thomas W. Davis Placing island archaeology and early voyaging in context 3. The origins of mammals on the Mediterranean islands as an indicator of early voyaging Jean-Denis Vigne 4. Cosmic impact, the Younger Dryas, Abu Hureyra, and the inception of agriculture in Western Asia Andrew M. T. Moore and Douglas J. Kennett 5. The homelands of the Cyprus colonizers: selected comments Ofer Bar-Yosef 6. Marine resources in the Early Neolithic of the Levant: their relevance to early seafaring Daniella E. Bar-Yosef Mayer 7. Early seafaring and the archaeology of submerged landscapes Geoff N. Bailey Case studies A. Cyprus 8. Tracing the steps in the fieldwork at the sites of Aspros and Nissi Beach on Cyprus Albert J. Ammerman 9. Akrotiri-Aetokremnos (Cyprus) 20 years later: an assessment of its significance Alan H. Simmons 10. The transportation of mammals to Cyprus sheds light on early voyaging and boats in the Mediterranean Sea Jean-Denis Vigne, Antoine Zazzo, Isabella Carrère, François Briois and Jean Guilaine 11. On the chipped stone assemblages at Klimonas and Shillourokambos and their links with the mainland François Briois and Jean Guilaine PART TWO (Eurasian Prehistory 11/2014) 12. Temporal placement and context of Cyro-PPNA activity on Cyprus Sturt W.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Cultures*
    UNIT 3 PALAEOLITHIC AND MESOLITHIC CULTURES* Structure 3.1 Objectives 3.2 Introduction 3.3 Palaeolithic Cultures 3.3.1 Perspectives on Gender Division of Labour in Palaeolithic Society 3.3.2 Lower Palaeolithic Cultures 3.3.3 Middle Palaeolithic Cultures 3.3.4 Upper Palaeolithic Cultures 3.3.5 Artistic Expressions 3.4 Mesolithic Cultures 3.4.1 Environmental Changes 3.4.2 Microlith Tools 3.4.3 Subsistence Pattern and Social Complexity 3.4.4 Mesolithic Cultures in Europe 3.4.5 Mesolithic Cultures in Scandinavia and Britain 3.4.6 Mesolithic Cultures in Southwest Asia 3.5 Summary 3.6 Key Words 3.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 3.8 Suggested Readings 3.9 Instructional Video Recommendations 3.1 OBJECTIVES This Unit looks at the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic cultures in the world context. After going through this Unit, you would be able to: z Explain the meaning of the term Palaeolithic and Mesolithic; z Identify the tool technology associated with these cultures; z Provide illustrations from the sites associated with these cultures; z Outline the cultural features of these cultures; and z Describe the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic cultures as a process of evolution. 3.2 INTRODUCTION The beginning of the story of humans is connected with cultural evolution. As Ian Hodder (2016), the British archaeologist opines, human association with tool making and other material culture contributes to evolutionary changes, both biological and cognitive. In a similar vein, William Andrefsky Jr. (2009) has stated that the lithic technologies and how they are designed, produced, recycled and discarded, tell us about the adaptive strategies of the foragers.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East : a Guide Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    STONE TOOLS IN THE PALEOLITHIC AND NEOLITHIC NEAR EAST : A GUIDE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John J. Shea | 422 pages | 28 Feb 2013 | CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9781107006980 | English | Cambridge, United Kingdom Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East : A Guide PDF Book Stones with evidence of grinding have been found. I Endscrapers and burins are two classic Upper Paleolithic found it interesting that the Tayacian is treated as a real in- retouched flake tool categories, as Shea notes, and there are dustry when it has been recently pointed out that the ma- several other types that can be analytically useful. The forms are varied and flaking is generally irregular which produces sinuous cutting edges. It is too bad that he does not also rec- categories; he is simply reporting them as used by various ommend this for the microlith class, which could use quite researchers. In concluding that typologies are descriptive in nature and this is one this chapter, Shea observes that many of the Neolithic stone of their main functions—a standardized way to compare tool types fit more easily into functional categories com- forms within and across assemblages. The geological age of Perigordian culture corresponds to the phase of the retreat of Wurm- I glaciation. Mousterian —40 ka Aterian —20 ka Micoquien —70 ka Sangoan —10 ka. And, it and subsistence increasing dependence on fewer plant and would be great to see a brief paragraph that stresses fact animal species aspects of Neolithic lifeways. Here Shea notes that typologies appear to begin to Dufour pieces is not marginal retouch.
    [Show full text]
  • 1167 New Dates from Submerged Late
    NEW DATES FROM SUBMERGED LATE PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTS IN THE SOUTHERN SEA OF GALILEE, ISRAEL D Nadel1 • S Belitzky2 • E Boaretto3 • I Carmi • J Heinemeier4 • E Werker5 • S Marco6 ABSTRACT. Unusual low water levels in the Sea of Galilee (Dead Sea Fault, Israel) have caused the recent exposure of sub- merged Late Pleistocene prehistoric sites and lacustrine sediments along the southern shores of the lake. The Ohalo II site is a large fisher–hunter–gatherers camp with in-situ brush hut floors, hearths, and a human grave. The site is radiometrically dated by 25 charcoal dates to 19,430 BP (average, uncalibrated). The archaeological remains include quantities of excellently pre- served organic remains. These would not have been preserved without a rapid rise of lake level immediately after the occupa- tion, covering the remains with silts and sand. Recently a concentration of eight tree trunks were found about 1.5 km south of Ohalo II, of which five trunks were identified as Salix species and dated as a single accumulation at about 16,100 BP. The trunks, too, had to be submerged quickly together to ensure excellent preservation. The camp and the trunks were found at –212/ –213 m, almost 4 m below modern high water levels. We suggest that the finds represent two separate episodes of deposition during low lake levels, almost 3,000 radiocarbon years apart, each followed by an abrupt water rise. It is possible that climatic changes caused the observed fluctuations, though earthquakes (blocking or lowering the Jordan outlet, for example) cannot be ruled out. INTRODUCTION The study of global climatic changes during and immediately after the last glaciation is based on investigations from a wide range of sources.
    [Show full text]