Water for Energy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water for Energy Water for Energy Executive Summary World Energy Council Water for Energy Officers of the World Energy Council Water for Energy - Executive Summary World Energy Council Pierre Gadonneix Chair Copyright © 2010 World Energy Council Francisco Barnés de Castro Vice Chair, North America All rights reserved. All or part of this publication may be used or Norberto Franco de Medeiros reproduced as long as the following citation is included on each Vice Chair, Latin America/Caribbean copy or transmission: ‘Used by permission of the World Energy Council, London, www.worldenergy.org’ Richard Drouin Vice Chair, Montréal Congress 2010 Published 2010 by: C.P. Jain World Energy Council Chair, Studies Committee Regency House 1-4 Warwick Street London W1B 5LT United Kingdom Younghoon David Kim Vice Chair, Asia Pacific & South Asia ISBN: 978-0-946121-10-6 Jorge Ferioli Chair, Programme Committee Marie-José Nadeau Vice Chair, Communications & Outreach Committee Abubakar Sambo Vice Chair, Africa Johannes Teyssen Vice Chair, Europe Abbas Ali Naqi Vice Chair, Special Responsibility for Middle East & Gulf States Graham Ward, CBE Vice Chair, Finance Zhang Guobao Vice Chair, Asia Christoph Frei Secretary General World Energy Council Water for Energy 1 In recent decades, the combination of more users, with more uses of water has transformed the traditional water-energy ‘ladder’ that underpins all human, social and economic development into an ‘escalator’. Human civilization has always rested on access to complex vulnerability of the energy system—and water, and, more specifically, on its utilization. This vice versa. report aims to contribute to a better understanding of the critical linkages between water and energy— In addition, human-induced climate change is and the impact on both of climate change. It understood to be a key driver for change in energy identifies areas of opportunity where investment and water availability, allocation, production and and new regulations are needed, to ensure consumption. This carries significant implications sustainable global development. for managing water and energy security challenges. Climate change impacts will likely Growth, scarcity and stress exacerbate water stress in many countries, cities and communities, creating the prospect of greater Freshwater supplies are unevenly allocated across competition between different uses, as well as the globe and, at the same time, countries all over individual users of water. the world face water scarcity and water stress. Currently, the World Health Organization estimates With the threat of water scarcity and water stress, one-third of the Earth’s population lack the exacerbated by climate change, two challenges necessary quantities of water they need. have developed: Global population will continue to grow. The 1) Water for energy majority of growth will be in emerging and developing economies already experiencing water Water is needed throughout the energy sector. It is and energy security challenges. By 2050, the UN used in energy production and conversion, as well estimates that half the world’s population will live in as in other processes, such as the refining of nations that are short of water. Moving water to energy source products. The water requirements people and controlling supply will become even for producing different primary energy carriers vary; bigger issues in the years to come. there are significant differences between different types of electricity generation. However, freshwater Water is used in energy production and supply, is required for each step—energy extraction and and, in turn, energy is used for pumping, moving production, refining and processing, transportation and treating water. In recent decades, the and storage and electric power generation itself. combination of more users, with more uses of water has transformed the traditional water-energy 2) Energy for water ‘ladder’ that underpins all human, social and economic development into an ‘escalator’. As a Modern energy supplies have been harnessed to result, as the linkages between both energy and pump water from increasing deeper groundwater water systems have grown more complex and reserves and to divert whole rivers large distances. interdependent, water must be viewed as a With global population and global economic growth Water for Energy World Energy Council 2 Figure 1 Water for Energy, Energy for Water Source: Water, Energy and Climate Change, WBCSD, 2009 Water for Energy Extraction & Refining Hydropower Fuel Production Thermo electric (Ethanol, hydrogen) Cooling Wastewater Treatment Extraction & Transmission Energy Associated Drinking Water with Uses of Water Treatment Water for Energy set to continue, and a significant proportion of the 'water for energy' of the different regions, for the current human population lacking access to clean years 2020, 2035, and 2050. water supply and sewerage services, the ‘energy for water’ challenge has become a significant, By examining the growth of global population, global scale concern. changes in final energy consumption and water requirements needed to produce and generate the Current needs… necessary amounts of energy over the next decades, the report identifies: A situational analysis of the current ‘water for energy’ contexts sets out the water needs of Africa, i) the regions that suffer from water stress Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, and/or water scarcity, or will do so soon; and North America in the context of their energy and production, water withdrawal, and population. The ii) those regions where total internal ‘water footprint’ (the amount of water consumed to renewable water resources seem to be produce a unit of energy) of different methods of sufficient to meet requirements of water for fuel production shows how water consumption for energy, without competing with other basic operations making primary energy carriers water uses. available vary from fuel to fuel. Analyses explore the water needs of a range of energy processes, In light of these developments, the report highlights including crude oil, natural gas, coal, uranium, and the impact in terms of water savings of: biomass. Studies of the water requirements of the respective processes for generating electricity i) new technologies in processing primary show the water needs of different thermoelectric- energy, especially in thermal electricity generating technologies, and geothermal power- generation, and generating plants, as well as electricity from hydro, wind and solar. ii) increased use of renewable energy and improved energy efficiency. …and future projections Although oil presently accounts for as much as The data for current needs, along with the WEC's 34% of the global primary production, and scenario data from 2007 (updated 2009), provides decreasing to 22% by 2050, it accounts for only a basis for identifying the future requirements of 10% of water consumption in primary energy World Energy Council Water for Energy 3 Table 1 Development of population, energy consumption, and water for energy between 2005 and 2050 based on WEC Scenarios, 2007 (model updated in 2009); DOE/NETL, 2008; UNESCO-IHE, 2008; Gleick, 1994. World 2005 2020 2035 2050 Population (million) 6290.0 7842.3 8601.1 9439.0 Energy Consumption (EJ) 328.7 400.4 464.9 518.8 Energy Consumption (GJ/capita) 52.3 51.1 54.1 55.0 Water for energy (bill m³/year) 1815.6 1986.4 2087.8 2020.1 Water for energy (m³/capita) 288.6 253.3 242.7 214.0 production now, rising to 18% in 2050. This is which accounts for not even 10% of total primary mainly due to the increasing share of non- energy production. This relationship will change conventional oil in total oil production, from 1% now over time. In 40 years, the share of freshwater to 12% in 2050 and its higher water consumption. used to produce biomass will decrease to less than 80%, while at the same time the share of biomass While oil production over the next 40 years will rise in the total primary energy production will diminish rather slowly, natural gas production worldwide will to less than 5%. almost double, with the biggest increases in Asia, mainly in the Middle East, where it will almost triple Water consumption to generate electricity will more and North America, where it will double. Energy than double over the next 40 years. Whereas from coal production is presently below oil but will today, electricity generation per capita is on likely become higher over the next 30-40 years average 2.9 MWh/capita annually, ranging from (WEC Scenarios, 2007, model updated in 2009). 0.6 MWh/capita in Africa to 12.0 MWh/capita in Mining and refining coal, where refining includes North America, in 2050 the annual electricity washing and beneficiation, requires water at generation per capita will almost double to an various stages as well. Estimates show that average of 5.7 MWh/capita, ranging from approximately 0.164 m³ of water is needed per GJ. 2.0 MWh/capita in Africa to 17.3 MWh/capita in Overall the production of coal accounts for about North America. The highest increases will occur in 1% of total water consumption in energy Latin America, where electricity generation per production. capita will be four times higher than today, followed by Africa and Asia, where it will almost triple. In Uranium production presently accounts for Europe electricity generation per capita will approximately 6% of worldwide primary energy presumably double, whereas in North America it production and will rise to 9% over the next will increase by only 50%. Although worldwide 40 years, with the main producers being in Asia, electricity generation per capita will almost double, Europe and North America. Africa and South the amount of water consumed to generate America account for only 1% of the global uranium electricity is due to expected technology production. Mining, milling as well as the improvements and shifts, likely to stay at the same conversion and processing of uranium requires level or increase only slightly on a per capita basis less water per energy unit than anything else.
Recommended publications
  • Coping with Water Scarcity: What Role for Biotechnologies?
    ISSN 1729-0554 LAND AND WATER DISCUSSION 7 PAPER LAND AND WATER DISCUSSION PAPER 7 Coping with water scarcity: What role for biotechnologies? As one of its initiatives to mark World Water Day 2007, whose theme was "Coping with water scarcity", FAO organized a moderated e-mail conference entitled "Coping with water scarcity in developing countries: What role for agricultural biotechnologies?". Its main focus was on the use of biotechnologies to increase the efficiency of water use in agriculture, while a secondary focus was on two specific water-related applications of micro-organisms, in wastewater treatment and in inoculation of crops and forest trees with mycorrhizal fungi. This publication brings together the background paper and the summary report from the e-mail conference. Coping with water scarcity: What role for biotechnologies? ISBN 978-92-5-106150-3 ISSN 1729-0554 9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 6 1 5 0 3 TC/M/I0487E/1/11.08/2000 LAND AND WATER Coping with Water DISCUSSION PAPER Scarcity: What Role for 7 Biotechnologies? By John Ruane FAO Working Group on Biotechnology Rome, Italy Andrea Sonnino FAO Research and Extension Division Rome, Italy Pasquale Steduto FAO Land and Water Division Rome, Italy and Christine Deane Faculty of Law University of Technology, Sydney Australia FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2008 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities Overview
    U.S. Department of Energy The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities JUNE 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 DOE’s Motivation and Role .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 The DOE Approach ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Opportunities ............................................................................................................................................. 4 References ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Four Billion People Affected by Severe Water Scarcity
    Briefing paper Four billion people affected by severe water scarcity Number of people living in water scarce areas Research published in Science Advances on water scarcity by Prof. Hoekstra and Dr. Mesfin Mekonnen, researchers from University of Twente, reveals that as many as four billion people worldwide live under water scarcity for at least one month of the year. Their research shows that the earlier estimates did not capture the monthly variability of water scarcity and that the number of people affected by severe water scarcity are much higher. For example, the entire population of 37 countries and more than half of the population of 97 countries live under severe water scarcity during at least one month per year (Figure 1). This information is key in addressing Sustainable Development Goal 6.4 which aims to substantially reduce the number of people suffering from water scarcity. Blue water scarcity is a result of the cumulative impact of the blue water footprint of agriculture, domestic water supply and industry. In areas where blue water scarcity is greater than 1 – moderate, significant and severe water scarcity – environmental flow requirements are not met, which can lead to degradation of natural ecosystems, loss of valuable ecosystem services and negative impacts on subsistence uses, such as access to drinking and other household water and loss of local fisheries. Figure 1: Percentage of population experiencing severe water scarcity at least one month of a year. Source: Water Footprint Network Data from M.M. Mekonnen & A.Y. Hoekstra, University of Twente Trade risk and water scarcity As nations work toward securing food, water, energy and other essential inputs for people’s well being, livelihoods and the country’s economic development, most countries rely on imports as well as exports of goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment and Water Footprint of Hydrogen Production Methods: from Conventional to Emerging Technologies
    environments Article Life Cycle Assessment and Water Footprint of Hydrogen Production Methods: From Conventional to Emerging Technologies Andi Mehmeti 1,* ID , Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis 2 ID , George Arampatzis 3 ID , Stephen J. McPhail 4 and Sergio Ulgiati 5 1 Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, 80143 Naples, Italy 2 School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK; [email protected] 3 School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, 731 00 Chania, Greece; [email protected] 4 DTE-PCU-SPCT, ENEA C.R. Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 5 Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, 80134 Naples, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-327-556-3659 Received: 26 December 2017; Accepted: 2 February 2018; Published: 6 February 2018 Abstract: A common sustainability issue, arising in production systems, is the efficient use of resources for providing goods or services. With the increased interest in a hydrogen (H2) economy, the life-cycle environmental performance of H2 production has special significance for assisting in identifying opportunities to improve environmental performance and to guide challenging decisions and select between technology paths. Life cycle impact assessment methods are rapidly evolving to analyze multiple environmental impacts of the production of products or processes. This study marks the first step in developing process-based streamlined life cycle analysis (LCA) of several H2 production pathways combining life cycle impacts at the midpoint (17 problem-oriented) and endpoint (3 damage-oriented) levels using the state-of-the-art impact assessment method ReCiPe 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Resources
    3 Freshwater Resources Coordinating Lead Authors: Blanca E. Jiménez Cisneros (Mexico), Taikan Oki (Japan) Lead Authors: Nigel W. Arnell (UK), Gerardo Benito (Spain), J. Graham Cogley (Canada), Petra Döll (Germany), Tong Jiang (China), Shadrack S. Mwakalila (Tanzania) Contributing Authors: Thomas Fischer (Germany), Dieter Gerten (Germany), Regine Hock (Canada), Shinjiro Kanae (Japan), Xixi Lu (Singapore), Luis José Mata (Venezuela), Claudia Pahl-Wostl (Germany), Kenneth M. Strzepek (USA), Buda Su (China), B. van den Hurk (Netherlands) Review Editor: Zbigniew Kundzewicz (Poland) Volunteer Chapter Scientist: Asako Nishijima (Japan) This chapter should be cited as: Jiménez Cisneros , B.E., T. Oki, N.W. Arnell, G. Benito, J.G. Cogley, P. Döll, T. Jiang, and S.S. Mwakalila, 2014: Freshwater resources. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 229-269. 229 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 232 3.1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Environment and Conflict Prevention the Role of the United Nations
    FULL REPORT LINKING ENVIRONMENT AND CONFLICT PREVENTION THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CSS peace ETH Zurich © CSS and swisspeace 2008 Center for Security Studies (CSS) ETH Zurich Seilergraben 45-49 - SEI CH – 8092 Zürich Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 Fax: +41-44-632 19 41 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch swisspeace Sonnenbergstrasse 17 P.O. Box CH - 3000 Bern 7 Tel.: +41-31-330 12 12 Fax: +41-31-330 12 13 [email protected] www.swisspeace.ch A report by Simon A. Mason, Adrian Muller Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Albrecht Schnabel, Rina Alluri, Christian Schmid swisspeace, Bern Supervised by Andreas Wenger (CSS), Victor Mauer (CSS), and Laurent Goetschel (swisspeace) This is the full report, which can be accessed at <www.css.ethz.ch> and <www.swisspeace.ch> as well as in the “CSS Environment and Conflict Transformation” Series (www.isn.ethz.ch > “Publishing House” > “Publication Series”). An 18-page summary of this full report can be accessed at the same websites. Cover photo Paul Klee, Rosenwind 1922,39 Ölfarbe auf Grundierung auf Papier auf Karton 38,2 x 41,8 cm Zentrum Paul Klee, Bern, Schenkung Livia Klee Contents Foreword..................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures and Tables...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Theft in Rural Contexts Abstract
    Water theft in rural contexts Rob White Distinguished Professor of Criminology School of Social Sciences University of Tasmania AUSTRALIA Contact author – Rob White: [email protected]; +61 3 6226 2877 Abstract Water theft is a phenomenon that is set to grow in the light of climate change, chronic drought, freshwater scarcity, and conflicts over natural resources. Drawing upon recent developments pertaining to poor regulation and the stealing of water from the Murray- Darling river system in Australia, this paper explores the cultural and political economic dimensions of water theft in the context of rurality and criminality. Framed within the overarching perspective of green criminology, the article examines water theft through the lens of rural folk crime as well as failures of regulation and environmental law enforcement. It raises issues relating to the social construction of victims of water theft, human (such as Indigenous people) and non-human (such as ecosystems). This article argues that the geographical location of water theft is integral to the dynamics of the harms committed, and the response of both governments and residents to the crime. Key words: water theft; green criminology; rural folk crime; Murray-Darling river; environmental regulation © 2019 White. This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) Water theft in rural contexts – White Introduction In July 2017, an Australian Broadcasting Corporation Four Corners investigation revealed a series of improper conducts pertaining to the Murray-Darling Basin, the largest fresh-water system in Australia (ABC, 2017). Four Corners is a long-running investigative current affairs television program produced by the national public broadcaster (the ABC).
    [Show full text]
  • Narratives of Scarcity: Understanding the 'Global Resource Grab'
    Working Paper Working Narratives of scarcity: understanding the ‘global resource grab’ Ian Scoones, Rebecca Smalley, Ruth Hall, Dzodzi Tsikata February 2014 Working Paper 076 www.future-agricultures.org Abstract Global resource scarcity has become a central policy concern, with predictions of rising populations, natural resource depletion and hunger. Resulting narratives of scarcity drive behaviour and justify actions to harness resources considered ‘under-utilised’, leading to contestations over rights and entitlements and producing new scarcities. Yet scarcity is contingent, contextual and above all political. We present an analysis of three framings – absolute scarcity, relative scarcity and political scarcity – associated with the intellectual traditions of Malthus, Ricardo and Marx, respectively. A review of 134 global and Africa-specific policy and related sources produced over the past six years demonstrates how diverse framings of scarcity – what it is, its causes and what is to be done – are evident in competing narratives that animate debates about the future of food and farming in Africa and globally. We argue that current mainstream narratives emphasise absolute and relative scarcity, while ignoring political scarcity. We suggest a more political framing of scarcity requires paying attention to how resources are distributed between different needs and uses, and so different people and social classes. This requires, we argue, a policy emphasis for land and resource issues on rights and access, and distributional issues, centred on equity and justice. Working Paper 076 2 www.future-agricultures.org 1. Introduction agribusiness and civil society material concerning agriculture, natural resources, food availability and the global land rush? We considered material that addresses Understandings of what has been called the ‘global these issues at a global level, as well as material that resource grab’ – the large-scale acquisition of land and focuses on sub-Saharan Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Formal Definition of Water Scarcity in Natural-Human Systems W
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 49, 4506–4517, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20249, 2013 Toward a formal definition of water scarcity in natural-human systems W. K. Jaeger,1 A. J. Plantinga,2 H. Chang,3 K. Dello,4 G. Grant,5 D. Hulse,6 J. J. McDonnell,7 S. Lancaster,8 H. Moradkhani,9 A. T. Morzillo,10 P. Mote,4 A. Nolin,8 M. Santelmann,11 and J. Wu1 Received 27 February 2012; revised 8 April 2013; accepted 9 April 2013; published 8 July 2013. [1] Water scarcity may appear to be a simple concept, but it can be difficult to apply to complex natural-human systems. While aggregate scarcity indices are straightforward to compute, they do not adequately represent the spatial and temporal variations in water scarcity that arise from complex systems interactions. The uncertain effects of future climate change on water scarcity add to the need for clarity on the concept of water scarcity. Starting with a simple but robust definition—the marginal value of a unit of water we— highlight key aspects of water scarcity and illustrate its many biophysical and socioeconomic determinants. We make four central observations. First, water scarcity varies greatly across location, time, and a multitude of uses that are valued either directly or indirectly by society. Second, water scarcity is fundamentally a normative, anthropocentric concept and, thus, can and should be distinguished from the related, purely descriptive notion of water deficit. While such an anthropocentric perspective may seem limiting, it has the potential to encompass the vast range of interests that society has in water.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Scarcity, Conflict, and Security in a Climate Change World: Challenges and Opportunities for International Law and Policy
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 3-2009 Water Scarcity, Conflict, and Security in a Climate Change orld:W Challenges and Opportunities for International Law and Policy Gabriel Eckstein Texas A&M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Environmental Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Gabriel Eckstein, Water Scarcity, Conflict, and Security in a Climate Change orld:W Challenges and Opportunities for International Law and Policy, 27 Wis. Int'l L.J. 409 (2009). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/333 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WATER SCARCITY, CONFLICT, AND SECURITY IN A CLIMATE CHANGE WORLD: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLICY GABRIEL ECKSTE1N* I. Introduction ................................................................................ 4 10 II. Climate Change and Fresh Water Resources ............................. 414 A . D roughts and Floods ........................................................... 415 B. Agriculture and Food Security ............................................ 419 C . H um
    [Show full text]
  • Water Facts and Trends
    Facts and trends Water Version 2 Introduction Everyone understands that water is essential to life. But many are only just [ now beginning to grasp how essential it is to everything in life – food, energy, transportation, nature, leisure, identity, culture, social norms, education, gender equality and virtually all the products used on a daily basis. In particular, water, energy and climate change need to be tackled together, and these are linked to agriculture too. Therefore, this paper is [ only a piece of the puzzle and should not be viewed in isolation from other sustainability concerns. Since 2004, the WBCSD has consolidated its position as the leading business voice on water in major policy events. The project has produced a set of tools intended to help companies integrate water issues in their strategic planning. These tools include Water Scenarios to 2025 (2006) and the Global Water Tool (2007). From the start, WBCSD water publications have documented successful experiences in water management within and outside a company's fenceline. A prime example of this is Collaborative he WBCSD’s Water Project aims to Actions for Sustainable Water Management (2005). enhance awareness in the Tbusiness community of critical This working document provides an overview of some basic facts and societal challenges water issues while actively promoting related to water. It has been developed by the WBCSD secretariat and is intended to mutual understanding between business support the ongoing dialogue within the WBCSD membership and with other and non-business stakeholders. stakeholders in civil society and government. The emphasis in this document is on water Engaging leading companies availability and people’s use of water for agricultural, industrial and domestic purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Desertification in Iran
    hydrology Article Drought and Desertification in Iran Iraj Emadodin *, Thorsten Reinsch and Friedhelm Taube Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Group of Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-880-1516 Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Iran has different climatic and geographical zones (mountainous and desert areas), mostly arid and semi-arid, which are suffering from land degradation. Desertification as a land degradation process in Iran is created by natural and anthropogenic driving forces. Meteorological drought is a major natural driving force of desertification and occurs due to the extended periods of low precipitation. Scarcity of water, as well as the excessive use of water resources, mainly for agriculture, creates negative water balances and changes in plant cover, and accelerates desertification. Despite various political measures having been taken in the past, desertification is still a serious environmental problem in many regions in Iran. In this study, drought and aridity indices derived from long-term temperature and precipitation data were used in order to show long-term drought occurrence in different climatic zones in Iran. The results indicated the occurrence of severe and extremely severe meteorological droughts in recent decades in the areas studied. Moreover, the De Martonne Aridity Index (IDM) and precipitation variability index (PVI) showed an ongoing negative trend on the basis of long-term data and the conducted regression analysis. Rapid population growth, soil salinization, and poor water resource management are also considered as the main anthropogenic drivers.
    [Show full text]