Balicka-Witakowska Constantinople.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Balicka-Witakowska Constantinople.Pdf The Urban Mind Cultural and Environmental Dynamics Edited by Paul J.J. Sinclair, Gullög Nordquist, Frands Herschend and Christian Isendahl African and Comparative Archaeology Department of Archaeology and Ancient History Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2010 Cover: NMH THC 9113 Artist: Cornelius Loos Panorama over the southern side of Istanbul facing north east. Produced in 1710. Pen and brush drawing with black ink, grey wash, water colour on paper. The illustration is composed of nine separate sheets joined together and glued on woven material. Original retouching glued along the whole length of the illustration. Dimensions (h x b) 28,7 x 316 cm Photograph © Erik Cornelius / Nationalmuseum English revised by Laura Wrang. References and technical coordination by Elisabet Green. Layout: Göran Wallby, Publishing and Graphic Services, Uppsala university. ISSN 1651-1255 ISBN 978-91-506-2175-4 Studies in Global Archaeology 15 Series editor: Paul J.J. Sinclair. Editors: Paul J.J. Sinclair, Gullög Nordquist, Frands Herschend and Christian Isendahl. Published and distributed by African and Comparative Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Box 626, S-751 26 Uppsala. Printed in Sweden by Edita Västra Aros AB, Västerås 2010 – a climate neutral company. 341 009 Trycksak 13. Constantinople in the Transition from Late Antiquity to the Middle Ages Ewa Balicka-Witakowska Contact details Dr Ewa Balicka-Witakowska Department of Linguistics and Philology Byzantine Studies Uppsala University Box 635 751 26 Uppsala, Sweden <\\\¬<< ABSTRACT This chapter gives an overview of the transformations which took place in Constantinople from the time of its foundation in the early 4th century as a Late Antique metropolis and $#$#Áth century when it was changed to a medieval town, perhaps less splendid in some respects but well adapted to new geopolitical and economic circumstances and still the centre of imperial power. In order to present this complicated process, attention has been given to different aspects of the city’s development: organization; use and design of the urban space, both public and private; the elaborate infrastructure, primarily in regard to sustenance and water supply and their sensitivity to climatic changes; the connections to the hinterland; the growing need of improved defence; and last but not least the social and spiritual life of the inhabitants. The picture emerging from such an approach shows that alongside political and economic transformations the crucial factor responsible for a shift in the general pattern of Constantinople’s urban life was the advancement of Christianity. The new religion not only gradually dislodged old beliefs and customs but also changed people’s mentality, $\ # # $ ! < ` symptomatic that Constantinople, which was founded with the idea of making it the New Rome, appears at the threshold of the Middle Ages as the New Jerusalem. Introduction1 The city of Constantinople, with its continuous history stretching forward to the present time, is without doubt one of the most successful urban achievements in 1 The following works have been consulted during the writing of this chapter but are not directly referred to: Ahrweiler 1966; Bauer 2001; Charanis 1972; Cameron 1974; Dagron ·ÂÁ§·Â¹»·Â¹Â·Âº[·Âº§[}·Âº·[¥·Â¹¨[} & Wixom 1997; Guillard 1967, 1969; Haldon 1990; Hatlie 2007; Jacoby 1961; Janin 1953, 1964; Kaplan 1992; Kazdhan & Constable 1982; Kazhdan et al 1991; Koder 1995; =·Â¨[=·ÂºÂ·Â¹··Âº[=¥Y\·Â¨·[=¥ 329 Plate 1. Panorama of Constantinople: view from Galata towards the old city. Courtesy of Maja Kominko. world history. For nearly two millennia it has not only survived but also held a $}<2 To better understand how Constanti- nople could effectively function and successfully evolve for such a long time, we may start by examining the period that witnessed the transition from a Late Antique Roman city to the Byzantine medieval urban agglomeration of the eighth century. Founded around 3243 as the capital of the East Roman Empire, Constantino- #$ dramatic falls. As a result of such changes in prosperity, the city underwent pro- found transformations not only in terms of territorial extent, size of population, economic power and administrative machinery, but also in terms of a fundamen- tal metamorphosis of people’s mentality. Therefore, it would be interesting to determine what particular characteristics distinguished Late Antique Constan- tinople of from its medieval successor. What lay behind these differences; why and when did the changes occur, in what form, and what results they generated? Documentation of the transformation process on the basis of written records # widely diverging views about the nature of this process and the consequences it engendered. Historians consulting the literary material deal on the one hand with laconic reports deprived of any personal observations, such as the univer- sal Chronicon Paschale 4 covering the period up to 672, and on the other hand with accounts full of rhetorical exaggerations and erudite clichés, as in the De +, the description of Justinian’s building activities written by his historian, Procopius.5 Moreover, for the period of the late seventh and eighth centuries the material is notoriously poor. In addition, very little data provided by the texts can be used for statistical purposes. An exception may be the Notitia urbis Constan- tinopolitanae, an anonymous regional catalogue compiled in Latin between 425 and 430, which describes fourteen regions of the city and points out the most #<6 A similar work, partly based on the 1995; Maraval 1985; Mathews 1971; Miranda 1976; Müller-Wiener 1977; Patlagean 1977; Stathakopoulos 2004; Teall 1959; Volbach 1973; von Milligen 1899. 2 Almost 13 million inhabitants. 3 Inaugurated on 11 May, 330. 4 Chronicon Paschale. 5 Procopius, + 6 Notitia. Notitia$$# of Constantinople and the architectural design of the city. 330 Notitia, was known as the Patria of Constantinople or Scriptores originum Constan- tinopolitanarum, compiled about 995.7 The so-called Book of Eparch 8 forms a valuable source of information about the administration of the city and the responsibilities of capital’s prefect, while ]\Farmer’s Law.9 An interesting panorama of medieval attitudes to Constantinople’s pagan past is found in the anonymous eighth-century work, Parastaseis syntomoi chronikai, or “Brief Historical Notes”, which deals with the monuments of the city and may be treated as a kind of catalogue of its antiquities.10 Some realistic pictures of life in Constantinople can be found in the lives of the saints connected to the city, the most important of which is the collection of miracles of Saint Artemios, an Egyptian martyr enshrined in, among other places, Constantinople.11 Written in the second half of the seventh century, but based on older material, the work provides a detailed account of the everyday life of the city in the sixth and seventh centuries. Also very useful in this respect is the Life of Andrew the Fool, most probably written in the 9th or 10th century.12 Generally speaking, the archaeological evidence concerning Constantinople, and in particular the documentation of the fourth through eighth centuries, is not in abundance either. The little that was left of the antique city has been absorbed into the modern fabric of Istanbul. Although many excavations have ##$ manner to determine a satisfactory chronology of the city’s development. The superimposition of the modern capital has greatly hampered a more advanced investigation of important sites within the ancient part of the city.13 New Rome The Constantinian city: organization of the public space One of the undisputable factors in the successful history of Constantinople is its particularly favourable location: a triangular peninsula protected by the waters joining the Mediterranean and Black Seas and separating the continents of Eu- rope and Asia. It provided excellent natural facilities for defence against military attacks and for the transportation of goods and people. Although the history of the site previously known as Byzantion went back to the seventh century BC, it did not develop into an important city until it was promoted to the position of New Rome.14 As a result of this decision, the old city was extended, rebuilt and populated with new inhabitants who migrated there from areas throughout the empire, at- 7 Scriptores originum Constantinopolitanarum. 8 Book of the Eparch. 9 Farmer’s Law. 10 Parastaseis syntomoi chronikai. 11 The Miracles of St. Artemios. 12 Leontios of Neapolis, Life of St. Symeon the Fool. 13 Mango 1993, 132f. ·» ##$'·Âª ¦··+ who transformed it into a typical Roman city, just as he did with several other places. 331 Fig. 1. Map of Constantinople. Drawing by Alicja Grenberger. tracted by the free distribution of bread, the prospects of employment, and the proximity to the imperial court. Their numbers increased from about 2000 to 350000, as noted at the end of the reign of Emperor Constantine in 337.15 The area of the Constantinian city was enlarged to about seven hundred hec- #\$- tres long.16 Two harbours, the Neorion and the Posphorion, with a joint shoreline of about 1500 metres, as well as the sea walls along the Bosporus inlet known as #=$'|+#< The plan of the city was not unique but followed the standard applied in most towns during the time period. The streets were laid in a regular pattern with two broad main avenues, the emboloi, bordered by colonnades and meeting at right angles. The streets were punctuated with public places, commemorative arches, tetrapylons, squares and communal buildings, all connected to each other by a complex system of annexes and colonnaded passages which also sheltered the shops. 15 Notitia states 4388 houses; it is estimated that at this time 50 people were living in one house. For further discussion on this issue and on the population of Constantinople in general, see Dagron 1974, 518–54, esp. 525ff. 16 In comparison to the old town, the urban territory of the Constantinian city was almost quadrupled.
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • (Valens) Aqueduct in Istanbul
    International Journal of the Physical Sciences Vol. 5(11), pp. 1660-1670, 18 September, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS ISSN 1992 - 1950 ©2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Out-of-plane seismic analysis of Bozdogan (Valens) aqueduct in Istanbul M. Arif Gurel*, Kasim Yenigun and R. Kadir Pekgokgoz Faculty of Engineering, Harran University, Civil Engineering Department, Osmanbey Campus, 63190, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Accepted 17 September, 2010 The Bozdogan (Valens) aqueduct in Istanbul is one of the most prominent water supply structures inherited from the Byzantine period. The paper investigates the out-of-plane seismic resistance of the aqueduct. The structural system of the aqueduct is composed of a series of piers connected to each other with arches at two tier levels. Taking advantage of the structural periodicity, only one pier of the highest part of the aqueduct is considered for the analysis instead of the whole structure. This pier is modelled as a cantilever prismatic element subjected to gravity load and increasing lateral load representing out-of-plane seismic loading. It is assumed that the pier is made of a no-tension material, with a linear stress-strain relationship in compression, and has infinite compression strength. To accomplish the solution, an efficient numerical model and solution procedure developed by La Mendola and Papia for investigating the stability of masonry piers under their own weight and an eccentric top load, is utilised and adapted to the problem at hand. The analysis showed that, although, the aqueduct can withstand out-of-plane earthquake ground motions of medium size and usually encountered periods, it is vulnerable to the ones containing long-period pulses.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: the World’S Earliest Cities & Temples September 14 - 23, 2013 Global Heritage Fund Turkey: the World’S Earliest Cities & Temples September 14 - 23, 2013
    Global Heritage Fund Turkey: The World’s Earliest Cities & Temples September 14 - 23, 2013 Global Heritage Fund Turkey: The World’s Earliest Cities & Temples September 14 - 23, 2013 To overstate the depth of Turkey’s culture or the richness of its history is nearly impossible. At the crossroads of two continents, home to some of the world’s earliest and most influential cities and civilizations, Turkey contains multi- tudes. The graciousness of its people is legendary—indeed it’s often said that to call a Turk gracious is redundant—and perhaps that’s no surprise in a place where cultural exchange has been taking place for millennia. From early Neolithic ruins to vibrant Istanbul, the karsts and cave-towns of Cappadocia to metropolitan Ankara, Turkey is rich in treasure for the inquisi- tive traveler. During our explorations of these and other highlights of the coun- FEATURING: try, we will enjoy special access to architectural and archaeological sites in the Dan Thompson, Ph.D. company of Global Heritage Fund staff. Director, Global Projects and Global Heritage Network Dr. Dan Thompson joined Global Heritage Fund full time in January 2008, having previously conducted fieldwork at GHF-supported projects in the Mirador Basin, Guatemala, and at Ani and Çatalhöyük, both in Turkey. As Director of Global Projects and Global Heri- tage Network (GHN), he oversees all aspects of GHF projects at the home office, manages Global Heritage Network, acts as senior editor of print and web publica- tions, and provides support to fundraising efforts. Dan has BA degrees in Anthropology/Geography and Journalism, an MA in Near Eastern Studies from UC Berkeley, and a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobles of Skeppsbron in Stockholmõs Old Town 1650-1850
    2 Contents The purpose and disposition of the program ..........................................5 Previous Scholarship and issues considered in the present research program.....................................................................................7 I. The Skeppsbro nobles as trade capitalists:.......................................8 II. The Skeppsbro nobles as intermediaries for new products: .........10 Investigations within the research program..........................................12 The Skeppsbro nobles as a social group:...........................................12 I. Investigations of the Skeppsbro nobility as trade capitalists:........13 II. Investigations of the Skeppsbro nobility in the introduction of new wares:.....................................................................................14 Reporting and publication of program results ......................................15 References.............................................................................................17 3 4 The purpose and disposition of the program The purpose of the program The “Skeppsbro Nobility” in Stockholm’s Old Town 1650–1850 is to investigate how merchants introduced a modern economic and social behavior in the Swedish economy and what this dy- namic element meant for Sweden’s economic and social development in the long term. Modern economic behavior is understood in relation to two sets of problems that will be a focal point for research within this program. In the first place an entrepreneurial, profit-maximizing behavior
    [Show full text]
  • Χρονολόγηση Γεωγραφικός Εντοπισμός Great Palace In
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Westbrook Nigel (21/12/2007) Για παραπομπή : Westbrook Nigel , "Great Palace in Constantinople", 2007, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=12205> Great Palace in Constantinople Περίληψη : The Great Palace of the byzantine emperors was the first imperial palace in Constantinople. It was founded as such, supposedly by Constantine the Great, in his newly founded capital. It remained the primary imperial palace in Constantinople up to and beyond the reign of emperor Constantine VII (913-959), in whose Book of Ceremonies its halls are named. Χρονολόγηση 4th-10th c. Γεωγραφικός εντοπισμός Constantinople, Istanbul 1. Introduction The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors in Constantinople was the ceremonial heart of the Byzantine Empire for a millennium, and occupied a site that is now recognized as a World Heritage precinct [Fig. 1].1 The Great Palace has a high cultural and historical significance, exerting a significant influence on both Western European and Levantine palatine architecture, and forming a link between Imperial Roman and medieval palaces. It is, nonetheless, only partially understood. Its remains are largely buried under later structures, notably the Sultan Ahmet Mosque, and can only be interpreted through texts and old representations. 2. The Upper Palace, including the Daphne Palace The oldest portion of the Great Palace, the Palace of Daphne, built by Constantine the Great and his successors in the 4th and 5th centuries, was a complex that is thought to have occupied the site upon which the Sultan Ahmet, or Blue, Mosque now stands. Its immediate context comprised: the Hippodrome and adjacent palaces; the Baths of Zeuxippos; the Imperial forum or Augustaion, where Justinian I erected his equestrian statue on a monumental column in the 6th century; the churches of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. The Development of Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrarchs to the Herakleian Dynasty General Introduction The emperor, as head of state, was the most important and powerful individual in the land; his official portraits and to a lesser extent those of the empress were depicted throughout the realm. His image occurred most frequently on small items issued by government officials such as coins, market weights, seals, imperial standards, medallions displayed beside new consuls, and even on the inkwells of public officials. As a sign of their loyalty, his portrait sometimes appeared on the patches sown on his supporters’ garments, embossed on their shields and armour or even embellishing their jewelry. Among more expensive forms of art, the emperor’s portrait appeared in illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and wall paintings such as murals and donor portraits. Several types of statues bore his likeness, including those worshiped as part of the imperial cult, examples erected by public 1 officials, and individual or family groupings placed in buildings, gardens and even harbours at the emperor’s personal expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011)
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 27 | 2014 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) Angelos Chaniotis Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2266 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2266 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2014 Number of pages: 321-378 ISBN: 978-2-87562-055-2 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) », Kernos [Online], 27 | 2014, Online since 01 October 2016, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/2266 This text was automatically generated on 15 September 2020. Kernos Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) 1 Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2011 (EBGR 2011) Angelos Chaniotis 1 The 24th issue of the Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion presents epigraphic publications of 2011 and additions to earlier issues (publications of 2006–2010). Publications that could not be considered here, for reasons of space, will be presented in EBGR 2012. They include two of the most important books of 2011: N. PAPAZARKADAS’ Sacred and Public Land in Ancient Athens, Oxford 2011 and H.S. VERSNEL’s Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology, Leiden 2011. 2 A series of new important corpora is included in this issue. Two new IG volumes present the inscriptions of Eastern Lokris (119) and the first part of the inscriptions of Kos (21); the latter corpus is of great significance for the study of Greek religion, as it contains a large number of cult regulations; among the new texts, we single out the ‘sacred law of the tribe of the Elpanoridai’ in Halasarna.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcadius 8; (Column
    index INDEX 319 Arcadius 8; (column of) 184 Balat 213–14 Archaeological Museum 93ff Baldwin, Count of Flanders 15 Argonauts, myth of 259, 263, 276 Balıklı Kilisesi 197–98 Major references, in cases where many are listed, are given in bold. Numbers in italics Armenian, Armenians 25, 189, 192, Balkapanı Han 132 are picture references. 193, 241–42, 258, 278; (Cemetery) Baltalimanı 258 268; (Patriarchate) 192 Balyan family of architects 34, 161, 193; Arnavutköy 255 (burial place of) 268 A Alexander, emperor 67 Arsenal (see Tersane) Balyan, Karabet 34, 247 Abdülaziz, sultan 23, 72, 215, 251; Alexander the Great 7; (sculptures of) 96 Ashkenazi Synagogue 228 Balyan, Kirkor 34, 234 (burial place of) 117 Alexander Sarcophagus 94, 95 Astronomer, office of 42 Balyan, Nikoğos 34, 246, 247, 249, Abdülhamit I, sultan 23, 118; (burial Alexius I, emperor 13, 282 At Meydanı (see Hippodrome) 252, 255, 274, 275 place of) 43 Alexius II, emperor 14 Atatürk 24, 42, 146, 237, 248; Balyan, Sarkis 34, 83, 247, 258, 272, Abdülhamit II, sultan 23, 251, 252, Alexius III, emperor 14 (Cultural Centre) 242; (Museum) 243; 267 278; (burial place of) 117 Alexius IV, emperor 15 (statue of) 103 Bank, Ottoman 227 Abdülmecit I, sultan 71, 93, 161, 164, Alexius V, emperor 15 Atik Ali Pasha 171; (mosque of) 119 Barbarossa, pirate and admiral 152, 247; (burial place of) 162 Ali Pasha of Çorlu, külliye of 119–20 Atik Mustafa Paşa Camii 216 250, 250; (burial place of) 250; Abdülmecit II, last caliph 24 Ali Sufi, calligrapher 157, 158 Atik Sinan, architect 130, 155, 212; (ensign
    [Show full text]
  • The Hagia Sophia in Its Urban Context: an Interpretation of the Transformations of an Architectural Monument with Its Changing Physical and Cultural Environment
    THE HAGIA SOPHIA IN ITS URBAN CONTEXT: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF AN ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT WITH ITS CHANGING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Architecture by Nazlı TARAZ August 2014 İZMİR We approve the thesis of Nazlı TARAZ Examining Committee Members: ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology _____________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ___________________________ Dr. Çiğdem ALAS 25 August 2014 ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Supervisor, Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ____ ___________________________ ______________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şeniz ÇIKIŞ Prof. Dr. R. Tuğrul SENGER Head of the Department of Architecture Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Assist.Prof.Dr.Zeynep AKTÜRE for her guidance, patience and sharing her knowledge during the entire study. This thesis could not be completed without her valuable and unique support. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my committee members Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM, Dr. Çiğdem ALAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdem ERTEN and Assist. Prof. Dr. Zoltan SOMHEGYI for their invaluable comments and recommendations. I owe thanks to my sisters Yelin DEMİR, Merve KILIÇ, Nil Nadire GELİŞKAN and Banu Işıl IŞIK for not leaving me alone and encouraging me all the time. And I also thank to Seçkin YILDIRIMDEMİR who has unabled to sleep for days to help and motivate me in the hardest times of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Bulgaria Is Famous for Its 600 Healing Mineral Water Springs
    Bulgaria Discover Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism Bulgaria, 1052 Sofia, 8 Slavyanska Str., Tel. +359 2 94071, fax: +359 2 987 2190 е-mail: [email protected] Bulgaria www.mee.government.bg www.bulgariatravel.org This document is created within the framework of the project “Elaboration and distribution of advertising and informational materials for promotion of Bulgaria as a tourism destination”, Agreement BG161PO001/3.3-01-4, realized with the financial support of Operational Programme “Regional development” 2007 – 2013, co-financed by the European Union through the European Fund for Regional Development. All responsibility for the contents of this document is borne by the beneficiary – the Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism and in no circumstances it should be regarded that this document reflects the official position of the European Union and the Governing Authority. USEFULL INFORMATION Bulgaria State government system: Parliamentary Republic Capital city: Sofia (population 1.2 million) Official language: Bulgarian, script – Cyrillic Religion: Orthodox (85%), Muslim (8%), other (7%) Time zone: GMT (London) + 2, Eastern Europe time (Germany) + 1 Climate: Humid continental, in the southern parts – transitive Mediterranean. Average temperatures for January are from -2 to 2 Сo in the lowland and -10 Сo in the mountains, in July 19-25 degrees Сo in the lowland and about 10 degrees Сo in the higher parts of the mountains. BULGARIARainfall - 450-600 mm in the lowland, up to 1300 mm in the mountains. Currency: Bulgarian lev
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of St Anna's Cult in Byzantium
    ASPECTS OF ST ANNA’S CULT IN BYZANTIUM by EIRINI PANOU A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 Acknowledgments It is said that a PhD is a lonely work. However, this thesis, like any other one, would not have become reality without the contribution of a number of individuals and institutions. First of all of my academical mother, Leslie Brubaker, whose constant support, guidance and encouragement accompanied me through all the years of research. Of the National Scholarship Foundation of Greece ( I.K.Y.) with its financial help for the greatest part of my postgraduate studies. Of my father George, my mother Angeliki and my bother Nick for their psychological and financial support, and of my friends in Greece (Lily Athanatou, Maria Sourlatzi, Kanela Oikonomaki, Maria Lemoni) for being by my side in all my years of absence. Special thanks should also be addressed to Mary Cunningham for her comments on an early draft of this thesis and for providing me with unpublished material of her work. I would like also to express my gratitude to Marka Tomic Djuric who allowed me to use unpublished photographic material from her doctoral thesis. Special thanks should also be addressed to Kanela Oikonomaki whose expertise in Medieval Greek smoothened the translation of a number of texts, my brother Nick Panou for polishing my English, and to my colleagues (Polyvios Konis, Frouke Schrijver and Vera Andriopoulou) and my friends in Birmingham (especially Jane Myhre Trejo and Ola Pawlik) for the wonderful time we have had all these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a View of Constantinople, with Its European
    IN THE UPPER CIRCLE, IS NOW OPEN, A VIEW OF R O U E N. AND, mi ©imcJLiB, A VIEW OF ATHENS. DESCRIPTION ' OF A VIEW OF • r\ CONSTANTINOPLE WITH ITS EUROPEAN AND ASIATIC SUBURBS, AND A GREAT EXTENT OF SURROUNDING COUNTRY. 1TOW msmmXTKM® AT THE PANORAMA ROYAL, LEICESTER SQUARE. IPAIOTSID m OTJ FMtfPlOTTGm, ROBERT BURFORD, ASSISTED BY H. C. SELOUS, FROM DRAWINGS TAKEN ON THE SPOT, By WILLIAM .1. SMITH, Esq., of Her Britannic Majesty’s Embassy at Constantinople. ilontron : PRINTED BY T. BRETTELL, RUPERT STREET, HAYMARKET. 3846. CONSTANTINOPLE. Constantinople is universally acknowledged to be the finest city in the whole world. Viewed from the Seraskier’s Tower, from whence the present Panorama is taken, the admirable position it occupies is fully apparent, and the whole of its curious internal economy is at once visible in its fullest extent and magnificence. Mosques, minarets, palaces, and kiosks, in countless variety, being spread out like a map beneath, whilst around, in every direction, stretches an immense extent of scenery of the most varied and picturesque description; on the one side the Bosphorus with the shores of Europe, on the other the sea of Mar¬ mora with the coast of Asia. Earth, sky, and water, combine to inspire wonder and admiration ; the scene is splendid and unique. Enthroned on her seven hills, Stamboul, indeed, deserves the proud title bestowed upon it of “ the Queen of Cities.” The Seraskier’s Tower is a lofty building crowning the third and highest hill of the ridge, and is consequently the most commanding situation in the city, or its immediate environs.
    [Show full text]