The Vicia Americana Complex (Leguminosae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Genus Bruchus Was Restricted by Schilsky (6
THE HAIRY-VETCH BRUCHID, BRUCHUS BRACHIALIS FAHRAEUS, IN THE UNITED STATES ' By J. C. BRIDWELL, formerly Specialist in Bruchidae and Their Parasites, Division of Stored Product Insects^ Bureau of Entomology, and L. J. BOTTIMER, Assistant Entomologist^ Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Agriculture INTRODUCTION The genus Bruchus was restricted by Schilsky (6) ^ to include only the immediate allies of Bruchus pisorum (L.), the pea weevil, of which he tabulated 24 species knowQ to him. To these may be added others doubtfully distinct, imperfectly known, or more recently described, which increase the nominal species of the genus to a total of about 46. All these species are native to the Palearctic region. Two of them are already well known in the United States as major pests of the plants affected. B. pisorum was the first of the genus and one of the first species of the family to be recognized. It was described in 1752, and was recorded as having destroyed in the 1740's the flourishing colonial American industry of producing dry peas for ships' stores. B. ruß- manus Boheman, the broadbean weevil, has now practically destroyed the broadbean industry of Caüfornia. A third species, B, hrachialis Fahraeus, has in recent years gained a foothold in this country, for in 1931 the junior author found it heavily infesting the seeds of vetches growing in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and North Carolina, and in 1932 it was found in Virginia. In view of these facts it seems wise to present a brief summary of the knowledge at present available of the habits of the members of this genus and to point out the increased danger of their estabhshment in the United States as a result of changed commercial conditions. -
KROK TESTS 2005-2016 PLANT CELL 1. After Application of Chlorine-Zinc-Iodine to the Thick Colourless Cell Membranes of Collenchy
1 KROK TESTS 2005-2016 PLANT CELL 1. After application of chlorine-zinc-iodine to the thick colourless cell membranes of collenchyme they became violet. That means the membranes are: A. Cellulose B. Lignificated C. Cutinized D. Mineralized E. Suberinized (2015) 2. A vegetational microspecimen was treated with Sudan III solution. As a result of it cell membranes turned pink that means they contain: A. Suberin B. Cellulose C. Lignin D. Pectin E. Hemicellulose (2007, 2009, 2011) 3. After a plant microslide had been processed with phloroglucinol together with concentrated hydrochloric acid, the cell membranes turned crimson red. This indicates presence of: A. Lignin B. Pectin C. Cellulose D. Hemicellulose E. Suberin (2009) 4. In the course of plant cells treatment with phloroglucinol with concentrated sulfuric acid their cell walls became crimson-red, which means: A. Lignification B. Suberization C. Mucification D. Cutinization E. Mineralization (2014) 5. During examination of a plant cell under the electron microscope some structures in form of a stack of flattened membrane cisterns and vesicles were found. What organelles are these? A. Golgi apparatus B. Endoplasmic reticulum C. Plastids D. Mitochondrions E. Microbodies (2010, 2011) 6. The section of a sunflower seed has been treated with Sudan III solution that caused pink-and-orange staining. This is the evidence of presence of: A. Fatty oil B. Protein C. Starch D. Inulin E. Cellulose (2010) 7. Microscopic study of soybean seeds stained with Sudan III revealed droplets of various sizes. They are: A. Lipids B. Proteins C. Starch D. Inulin E. Glycogen (2012, 2015) 8. Histochemical test for fixed oils with sudan III results in the following stain colour: A. -
Atlas of the Flora of New England: Fabaceae
Angelo, R. and D.E. Boufford. 2013. Atlas of the flora of New England: Fabaceae. Phytoneuron 2013-2: 1–15 + map pages 1– 21. Published 9 January 2013. ISSN 2153 733X ATLAS OF THE FLORA OF NEW ENGLAND: FABACEAE RAY ANGELO1 and DAVID E. BOUFFORD2 Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2020 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Dot maps are provided to depict the distribution at the county level of the taxa of Magnoliophyta: Fabaceae growing outside of cultivation in the six New England states of the northeastern United States. The maps treat 172 taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, and hybrids, but not forms) based primarily on specimens in the major herbaria of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, with most data derived from the holdings of the New England Botanical Club Herbarium (NEBC). Brief synonymy (to account for names used in standard manuals and floras for the area and on herbarium specimens), habitat, chromosome information, and common names are also provided. KEY WORDS: flora, New England, atlas, distribution, Fabaceae This article is the eleventh in a series (Angelo & Boufford 1996, 1998, 2000, 2007, 2010, 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c) that presents the distributions of the vascular flora of New England in the form of dot distribution maps at the county level (Figure 1). Seven more articles are planned. The atlas is posted on the internet at http://neatlas.org, where it will be updated as new information becomes available. This project encompasses all vascular plants (lycophytes, pteridophytes and spermatophytes) at the rank of species, subspecies, and variety growing independent of cultivation in the six New England states. -
Maine Coefficient of Conservatism
Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity -
5-Dr. Divya Mohanty
T REPRO N DU LA C The International Journal of Plant Reproductive Biology 8(2) July 2016, pp.158-165 P T I F V O E Y B T I DOI 10.14787/ijprb.2016 8.2.158-165 O E I L O C G O S I S E T S H Floral biology and reproductive attributes of six cultivated accessions of pigeonpea T Divya Mohanty1, Atika Chandra2 and Rajesh Tandon1,* 1Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi- 110 007, India 2Department of Botany, Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110021, India *e-mail : [email protected] Received: 20.09.2015; Revised: 14.12.2015; Accepted and published on line: 01.07.2016 ABSTRACT Leguminous crops offer numerous challenges in their improvement of yield. The narrow genetic base of present day legume cultivars is considered to be the major hurdle. Wide hybridization involving various cultivars and the relatives of target crop is considered a suitable strategy provided that there is scope for outcrossing, either naturally (dichogamy/herkogamy) or by manually overcoming the crossability barriers. Thus, the basic details of floral biology of crop plants in their respective agroclimatic zones are essential. Here, we provide a baseline data on the floral biology and some reproductive attributes of the six widely cultivated varieties of Cajanus cajan (pigeonpea). The study shows that the cultivars are predominantly protandrous, viability of the fresh pollen ranges between 60-90%, the potential brood size is realized by the time anthesis is achieved, variable rates of seed abortion (~ 8-26%) occur in the cultivars and pollen:ovule ratio suggests facultative xenogamous type of breeding system. -
Cow Vetch Vicia Cracca
Cow vetch Vicia cracca Description Species is a large concern in prairie and other natural habitat restoration or land reclamation projects. Habit Herbaceous, climbing or trailing, perennial, up to 3 ft long forb, 1-3 ft taproot. Leaves Pinnately-divided into 5-11 pairs of linear leaflets, leaf tips with tendrils. Stems Weak; range from 2-3 ft high; clamber over other vegetation; smothering; spreading hairs. Flowers Blue in color, 5-parted, 1/2 in long, calyx base not swollen, inflorescence a crowded, long-stalked Source: MISIN. 2021. Midwest Invasive Species Information Network. Michigan State University - Applied Spatial Ecology and Technical Services Laboratory. Available online at https://www.misin.msu.edu/facts/detail.php?id=163. cluster (raceme) with 20-50 stalked flowers. Fruits and Seeds Seeds are contained in numerous inch long pods, brownish lance-shaped and flat. Habitat Native to Eurasia. Found in fields, roadsides, meadows. Reproduction By seed. Similar American vetch (Vicia americana). Monitoring and Rapid Response Pulling small infestations before seeds develop; spray with selective herbicide such as clopyralid. Credits The information provided in this factsheet was gathered from the USDA PLANTS Database. Individual species images that appear with a number in a black box are courtesy of the Bugwood.org network (http://www.invasive.org).Individual photo author credits may not be included due to the small display size of the images and subsequent difficulty of reading the provided text. All other images appear courtesy of Google (http://images.google.com). Source: MISIN. 2021. Midwest Invasive Species Information Network. Michigan State University - Applied Spatial Ecology and Technical Services Laboratory. -
The Role of Crop-Pollinator Relationships in Breeding for Pollinator-Friendly Legumes: from a Breeding Perspective
Euphytica (2009) 170:35–52 DOI 10.1007/s10681-009-9953-0 The role of crop-pollinator relationships in breeding for pollinator-friendly legumes: from a breeding perspective Reid G. Palmer Æ Paola T. Perez Æ Evelyn Ortiz-Perez Æ Fouad Maalouf Æ Marı´a Jose´ Suso Received: 4 December 2008 / Accepted: 27 April 2009 / Published online: 21 May 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Breeders are encouraged to develop breed- to enhance pollinator conservation as well as crop yield ing approaches that strive to integrate food production and yield stability. We analyze how understanding into the healthy functioning of agro-ecosystems. In the crop-pollinator relationships (CPR) can contribute to case of legumes, this approach should preserve bee the production of high-yielding and pollinator-friendly fauna by providing suitable floral resources within the varieties by examining: (1) The status of knowledge on crops themselves. In parallel, legume breeding for mating systems and floral traits; (2) The contribution of sustainable agriculture is linked to the development of CPR understanding to plant breeding for both hybrid- environmental services. Foraging places and nesting seed production and open-pollinated population sites for solitary and social bees are some of the improvement. ecological services provided for legumes. Crops with floral attractiveness and rewards for insects can be used Keywords Bee pollinator Á Floral traits Á Heterosis Á Hybrid and population improvement Á Soybean Á Faba bean The authors R. G. Palmer and M. J. Suso contributed equally to this work. & R. G. Palmer ( ) Introduction USDA-ARS-CICGR, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Biologists recently compiled a world check list of bees. -
Research & Technology Transfer
Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Research & Technology Transfer ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Vetch Infestations in Alaska Prepared by: Andrew Nolen Agronomist Alaska Plant Materials Center Division of Agriculture Department of Natural Resources State of Alaska Date September 30, 2002 Prepared for: Alaska Department of Transportation Statewide Research Office 3132 Channel Drive Juneau, AK 99801-7898 FHWA-AK-RD-02-11 Form approved OMB No. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestion for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-1833), Washington, DC 20503 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (LEAVE BLANK) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED FHWA-AK-RD-02-11 September 30, 2002 Final, 8/2001 – 9/2002 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Vetch Infestations in Alaska 6. AUTHOR(S) Nolen, Andrew 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Alaska Plant Materials Center Division of Agriculture Department of Natural Resources AKSAS PROJECT# 74716 State of Alaska 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER State of Alaska, Alaska Dept. of Transportation and Public Facilities Research and Technology Transfer FHWA-AK-RD-02-11 2301 Peger Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709-5399 11. -
Les Plantes Hã´Te Des Bruches (Coleoptera Bruchidael : Donnã©Enouvelles Et Corrections
- 277 - Bull. mens. Soc. iinn. Lyon, 2005,74 (7-8) : 277-291 Les plantes hôte des bruches (Coleoptera Bruchidael : donnéenouvelles et corrections. Bernard Delobel* et Alex Delobel- * INWNSA, Laboratoire BF 2 1,20 avenue A. Einstein, F-69621 Villeurbanne cedex ** 47 avenue Paul Langevin, F-92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses Résume- Les auteurs complhtent et corrigent des résultatantérieur (DELOBEL & DELOBEL,2003) sur les relations trophiques entre les bruches de la faune françaiset leurs plan- tes hbtes larvaires. Les nouvelles donnéeconcernent la France, l'Italie et la Grke. Quarante- quatre plantes hr3tes nouvelles ont étidentifiks, et ceci constitue pour plusieurs espècede bru- ches les toutes premihres donnéebiologiques. Le régimalimentaire de 86 % des bruches de ces trois pays est ddsorrnais connu avec une plus ou moins grande prkision. L'hypothès prké deminent emise, selon laquelle chaque espke de broche est infhdé une esee, un genre ou tout au plus à une tribu, et une seule, se trouve confirmde dans la grande majoritÃdes cas. The host plants of seed-beetles (Coleoptera Bruchidae): new data and errata Summary. - The authors complete and modify results published in 2003 on trophic rela- tionships between seed-beetles of the French fauna and their larval host plants. New data are given for France, Italy and Greece. Forty-four new host plants were identified, which constitutes for several beetle species the very tïrsbiological data available. The diet of 86 5% of the se&- batles in the three countries is now more or less precisely known. The previously expressed hypothesis, according to which any given beetle species will feed on a single plant species, genus or tribe, is confimaed in most cases. -
WEED WACKERS! K-6 Educators Guide to Invasive Plants of Alaska
WEED WACKERS! K-6 Educators Guide to Invasive Plants of Alaska By Katie L. Villano and Christine P. Villano WEED WACKERS! K-6 Educators Guide to Invasive Plants of Alaska By Katie L. Villano and Christine P. Villano October 2008 Fairbanks, Alaska With Generous Support from: Salcha-Delta Soil and Water Conservation District 2 WEED WACKERS! K-6 Educators Guide to Invasive Plants of Alaska Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 4 Preface .................................................................................................................... 5 Why Use WEED WACKERS? .............................................................................. 7 How to Use WEED WACKERS ............................................................................ 9 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 13 Lessons by Grade Level ...................................................................................... 15 Lesson Activities .................................................................................................. 17 Unit 1: Invasive Plants in Alaska ...................................................................... 19 Introduction to Plants ........................................................................................................... 21 Invasion in Alaska!? ............................................................................................................ -
A Review for the Pollinators of Papilionaceous Flowers
Turkish Journal of Biodiversity Turk J Biod, March 2021, 4(1): 36-52 https://doi.org/10.38059/biodiversity.814617 Journal homepage: http://turkbiod.artvin.edu.tr/ e-ISSN:2667-4386 http://dergipark.org.tr/biodiversity REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access A review for the pollinators of Papilionaceous flowers Kelebek şeklinde çiçek açan çiçeklerin tozlayıcıları için bir inceleme Deniz AYGÖREN ULUER Ahi Evran University, Çiçekdağı Vocational College, Department of Plant and Animal Production, 40700, Çiçekdağı, Kırşehir, Turkey Article Info ©2021 Ali Nihat Gökyiğit Botanical ABSTRACT Garden Application and Research The evolution of keel flowers within Fabaceae, Polygalaceae and some other clades of angiosperms is Center of Artvin Coruh University. attributed to skilled and strong bees. However, whether this is true or not, is still an open question. Therefore, the literature is surveyed for the Hymenopteran pollinators of keel flowers, for 119 sources Corresponding author and for 112 species, six genera and two tribes for five characters which are the size of the flowers, e-mail: [email protected] Hymenopteran flower visitors/pollinators, size of the Hymenopteran pollinators, pollen and nectar ORCID: 0000-0002-2095-3816 robbers/thieves and size of the Hymenopteran thieves/robbers. The results suggest that Fabales keel Article history flowers are mainly pollinated by long-tongued bees, from Apidae and Megachilidae families; and the Received: October 22, 2020 most common pollinators of the keel flowers are small Megachile and Osmia; medium-sized Apis, Received in revised form: March 29, 2021 Anthophora and Eucera; and large Xylocopa, Bombus and Centris. While the literature suggests that Accepted: March 30, 2021 keel flowers are pollinated by skilled and strong bees, the results of the current review have shown Available online: March 31, 2021 that this is not the whole case in terms of flower size and bee size. -
Vicia Cracca)
Tufted Bird Vetch (Vicia cracca) Identification Overview Flowers: Flowers are pea-like and Tufted bird vetch is a perennial are arranged on one side of the herb in the pea family. A native stem. The 10 to 30 flowers are from Europe and Asia, tufted bird densely packed. vetch was introduced in North America purposely for forage and Stems: Multiple, branching, climbing cover crops. or trailing up to 2 meter long. Vine- Tufted bird vetch has escaped like stems are weak but have small from cultivation and is found tendrils that allow for climbing. throughout Canada, Alaska and the northern US states. Leaves: The leave consists of 12 – Tufted bird vetch is very palatable 24 leaflets. Leavlets are linear to to livestock. lanceolate and end in a pointed tip. It is found in gardens, waste Seed: The 4-8 seeds grow in a Flowers grow in a one-sided spike. places, old fields and along roads. pod. Seeds are viable for five to Photo: M. Rasy, University of Alaska, bugwood.org. Tufted bird vetch reproduces by seven years and large seed banks abundant seed production and are common. vegetative spread by underground stems. Infestations in Yukon are found in most communities including Whitehorse, Dawson, Watson Lake and Haines Junction. Tendrils allow the plant to attach to other plants or objects. Photo: M. Rasy, University of Alaska, bugwood.org. Ecological Impact Tufted bird vetch crowds out Tufted bird vetch alters soil conditions due to nitrogen fixation. This plant native vegetation and can is very successful at climbing and covering fences, trees and other aggressively take over areas by vegetation.