DOCSLIB.ORG

21St Symposium of AER on VVER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safety Dresden, September 19 - 23,20Ll

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
21St Symposium of AER on VVER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safety Dresden, September 19 - 23,20Ll 21st Symposium of AER on VVER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safety Dresden, September 19 - 23,20ll Gonference organizer: Institute of Safety Researchwithin the Helmholtz- Zentrum Dresden- Rossendorf, Germany VUJE, Inc., Okruzna 5, SK 918 64 Trnova, Slovakia KFKI Atomic Energt Research Institute, Reactor Analysis Department, Budapest, Hungary Corporate organ izations : Budapest University of Technologt and Economics, Hungary KFKI Atomic Energt Research Institute, Hungary Pal<s NPP, Hungary GRS, Germany SXOOI JS a.s., Czech Republic Nuclear Research Institute frez, Czech Republic CEZ, a.s., Dukovany NPP, Czech Republic Slovak University of Technologt in Bratislava, Slovakia NRC "Kurchatov Institute", Russia SNIIP Atom Ltd. Moscow, Russia SSTC NRS Kiev, Ulvaine Kozloduy NPP, Bulgaria INRNE Sofia, Bulgaria Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel Oregon State University, USA Fortum Power ond Heat Ltd., Finland 21st Symposium of AER on rlZ'JFI- ---- WER Reactor Physics and Reactor sarety- Dresden, September 19 - 23,20ll 6 ^""o"'I ZENTRUM DRESDEN R0SSENDoRF I Papers and Presentations Introduction 0.1 Opening and Welcome, S. Kliem, IIZDR, Germany 0.2 Overview on the Institute of Safety Research within the Helmholtz- Zentrum Dresden- Rossendorf, S. Kliem, HZDR, Germany 0.3 Publication possibilities for AER scientific papers, I-P"p*ll Pr.*tl A. Aszodi, Budapest University of Technologt and Economics, Hungarj- Session I - Sssion chair: T. Simeonov 0.4 Safety assessment of the German NPPs after the Fukushima accident, l-Prp*ll Pr*"rtl A. Pautz, GRS, Germany Topic 2 Reoctor physies ryefirnen$ arrd code vultdatton 2.1 "Full-Core" - VVER-440 core periphery power distribution benchmark proposal, TP"p*ltP.esentl V. Kr!,sl, P. Mikold|, D. Sprinzl, J. Svarny, SXOnd JS a.s., Czech Republic 2.2 Calculations of fission rate distribution in the core of VVER-1000 mock-up on the LR-0 reactor using altemative methods and l- PafillF.effil comparison with results of measurements, S. Zaritskiy, A. Kovalishin, T. Tsvetkov, NRC "Kurchatov Institute", Russia 2.3 Qualification of the APOLLO2 lattice physics code of the NURISP platform for VVER hexagonal lattices, i P"pdE"s"dl A. Keresztfiri, G. Heg,ti, A. T6to, KFKI Atomic Energt Research Institute, Hungary Session 2 - Session chair: A. Kereszt{ri 2.4 The simplified P3 approach on a trigonal geometry in the nodal reactor code DYN3D, fPry"f[p'"'dl S. Duerigen, E. Fridman, I{ZDR, Germany 2.5 Solution of the "MIDICORE'WER-1000 core periphery power distribution Benchmark by KARATE and MCNP, P"fillne'*il E. Temesvdri, G.Hord6sy, G. Hegti, Cs.Mardczy, KFKI Atomic t Energt Research Institute, Hungary 2.6 Solutions for the task I and task 2 of the benchmark for core burnup calculations for a WER-1000 reactor, P"p*ltP.*"'tl T. Ldtsch, V. Khalimonchuk, A. Kuchin, I fW SUD Industrie Sewice GmbH, Germany 21st Symposium of AER on WER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safety Dresden, September l9 - 23,2011 2.7 of a new 3_D neutronics model in ApRos, ?";;::il"f#,XX#;" Tp"pn[p,*."t1 2.8 SP3 solution versus diffusion solution in nodal codes - which improvement can be expected, B. Merk and S. Duerigen Session 3 - Session Chair: I. Ovdiienko Tapic I Spectral ond corc calealations l.l Information about AER WG A on improvement, extension and validation of parametrized few-group libraries for VVER 440 and l-P"p* ll P'"'*tl VVER IOOO, P. MikoldJ, SKODA JS a.s., Czech Republic 1.2 FIELIOS: Application for criticality limits assessment, T. Simeonov, Studsvik Scandpower GmbH, Germarry tTrffllP'".*tl 1.3 A comparison of the FA's models with the detailed and simplified description of the design elements in calculations by MCU code, t-tr"-p"Il-P*'il] A.S. Bikeev, S.I/. Marin, E.A. Sukhino-Khomenko, NRC "Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, Russia 1.4 Development of multi-group spectral code TVS-M, A.P. Lazarenko, A.V. Pryanichnil<ov, NRC "Kurchatov Institute" I P"p*llT.ffiq Moscow, Russia Session'4 - $ession Chair: P. Mikolr[S 1.5 An analytical solution for the consideration of the effect of adjacent fuel elements; extension to hexagonal fuel elements, Pap".llP."r*tl B. Merk, U, Rohde, mDR, Germany t 1.6 The influence of the small radial FAs displacements on the power distribution in the WER-cores, [PapollE E.A. Sukhino-Khomenko, NRC "Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, Russia 'e'tl 1.7 On solution to the problem of reactor kinetics with delayed neutrons, J. Kyncl, Nuclear Research Institute Rez, Czech Republic TP"p*lfp**dl 1.8 Influence of spectral history on full core calculation results, Y. Bilodid, S. Mittag, HZDR, Germany |pufillF."*"tl Session 5 - Session Chair: A.P. Lazarenko 1.9 Effect of burnup history by moderator density on neutron-physical characteristics of WWER- I 000 core, lT"p* ll P..'*tl I. Ovdiienfui, A. Kuchin, V. Khalimonchuh M.Ieremenfto, SSZCNRS Kiev, Ulcraine 1.10 The development of the code package PERMAK-3D/SC-1, P.**tl P.A. Bolobov,D.A. Olekryuk, NRC "Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, t-P"p.Il Russia TopicT Engineeringfactorc 7.I Information about Group H meeting, L.K Shishfuiv, NRC "Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, Russia l-T"p*llffil 2lst Symposium of AER on WERReactorPhysics and Reactor Safety Dresden, September 19 -23,2011 7.2 Estimation procedure for engineering margin factors of VVER fuel cycles, t P"dll P'*"'tl T.G. Dementiev, D.A. Oleksuk, L.K. Shishknv, NRC "Kurcholov Institute " Moscow, Russia Session 6 - Session Cbair: R 7.ejac Topie 3 Corc design, manitor@ undfael managemcn, 3.1 AER Working Group C activities in 2011 (oral presentation, only), P"p.IlP'.t*tl I. Nemes,Paks NPP, Hungory I 3.2 In-core control system modernization experience on WWER-I000 units, canceled A. Bylmv, SNIIP Atom Ltd. Moscow, Russia 3.3 Status and prospects of the core surveillance system SCORPIO-VVER--fP"fill in Czech Republic and Slovakia, - P."*ttl J. Molnar, R. Vocka, Nuclear Research Institute frez, Czech Republic 3.4 Role of the team of scientific and technical commissioning support during Mochovce NPP Unit3&4 commissioning, I P"pe'llE J. Hermanshi, M. Prachdr, M. Sedldcek, VUJE Inc., Slovakia "'tl Seesion 7 - Session Chair: J. Molnar 3.5 AER Working Group B activities in20ll, t-F-rfillF..*"tl P. Darileh VUJE Inc., Slovakia 3.6 i5m-cycle option forNPP Paks operation, I. Nemes, Pal6 NPP, Hungary TPadll P*'""t] 3.7 Experience of TVSA fuel implementation at Kozloduy NPP, P."r*tl K. Kamenov, AL Ksmenov, D. Hristov, Kozlo&ty NPP, Bulgaria fP"p"'-ll 3.8 Implementation of 5-year fuel cycle strategy for control fuel assemblies at Dukovany NPP, tT"p*ll P'"'*tl J.Bajgl, CEZ, a.s., Dukrany NPP, Czech Republic Session 8 - Session Chair: I. Nemes Toplc i Core design, moniturtng andfuel menagement 3.9 New practice for the evaluation of rod efficiency measurement by rod drop at the NPP Paks, t-PapdlfP.esEl I. P6s, T. Parkn, Pal<s NPP, Hungary 3.10 VVER 440 fuel cycles optimization by the ATF{ENA code, J. Prehradny, SKODA JS a.s., Czech Republic lP"p4lp'.'dl 3.1I Some remarks to the pin-wise power distribution behavior in L3P core designs, I P*ry"ItP.'"*tl M. Fiala, CEZ, a.s., Dukovany NPP, Czech Republic 3.12 Investigation of gamma radiation share in full SPND signal P"e*ll P.*""t] A.Y.Kurchenkov, A.S. Kulakov, N.I. Alexeev, A.E. Kslinushkin, NRC l " Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, Russio 2lst Symposium of AER on WER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safery Dresden, September 19 - 23,2011 Topic 5 Spentfuel disposal, aetinide transmutalion 5.1 AER Working Group E activities in2A|l, V. Chrapciak, YUJE Inc., Slovakia fP"fill P*'*tl Session 9 - Session Chair: J. Bajgl 5.2 Criticality safety analysis of fresh and spent fuel storage and handling forNPP Mochovce using MCNP5, P..'El G. Farkns, J. Haiiik, J. Liiley, B. Vrban, M. Petriska, V. Slugert, P. I-P"p"Il Urban, Slovak University of Technologt in Bratislova, Slovakia 5.3 WER-440 with viable direction to sustainability, P. Darilek, C. Strmensky, R. Zajac, J. Majercik, VUJE Inc., Slovakia fP"perltP'.*"tl 5.4 Comparison of square and hexagonal fuel lattices for high conversion PWRs, t-P-p".ltP*ffil D. Kotlyar, E. Shwageraus, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israer--- 5.5 ALLEGRO - Introduction to GFR, P. Darilek, R. kjac, VUJE Inc., Slovakia I-P"p".lt P'"*"tl Topic 7 Engineeringfactors 7.3 Account for uncertainties of control measurements in estimations of design margin factors, I P"p* ll P'"*"tl Y.G. Dementiev, V.D. Sidorenla, L.K. Shishkav, NRC "Kurchatov 'Institute " Moscow, Rus sia 7.4 Specific features of accounting for probable power excursions at periphery FAs, which are caused by FA gaps behaviour in the course ot_ VVER-1000 operation, E.F. Michailov, L.K Shishkov, NRC- "Kurchatov Institute" Moscow, Russia Session 10 - Sssion Chair: U. Rohde Toplc I Spectral end cote cslculation 1.1 I Steps ahead in the few-group cross-section library generation at the pin level, f P"p* ll P*'*tl N. Petrov, J-J. Herrero, INKNE Sofia, Bulgaria l.l2 Advanced calculation schemes and cross-section libraryr egeneration in ,- hexagonal geometry with APOLLO2, t P"p* ll P."tAl G. Todorova, N. Petrov, N. Zheleva, N.P. Kolev, F. Damian, INRNE Sofia, Bulgaria Topic 4 Reaetor dynuntics and safety anatysis 4.1 AER Working Group D on WER safety analysis - report of the 2011 meeting, S. Kliem, HZDR, Germany l-P"p*ll P'*."t] 4.2 Preliminary results of the seventh three-dimensional AER dynamic benchmark problem calculation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tokamak Foundation in USSR/Russia 1950--1990
    IOP PUBLISHING and INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR FUSION Nucl. Fusion 50 (2010) 014003 (8pp) doi:10.1088/0029-5515/50/1/014003 Tokamak foundation in USSR/Russia 1950–1990 V.P. Smirnov Nuclear Fusion Institute, RRC ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow, Russia Received 8 June 2009, accepted for publication 26 November 2009 Published 30 December 2009 Online at stacks.iop.org/NF/50/014003 In the USSR, nuclear fusion research began in 1950 with the work of I.E. Tamm, A.D. Sakharov and colleagues. They formulated the principles of magnetic confinement of high temperature plasmas, that would allow the development of a thermonuclear reactor. Following this, experimental research on plasma initiation and heating in toroidal systems began in 1951 at the Kurchatov Institute. From the very first devices with vessels made of glass, porcelain or metal with insulating inserts, work progressed to the operation of the first tokamak, T-1, in 1958. More machines followed and the first international collaboration in nuclear fusion, on the T-3 tokamak, established the tokamak as a promising option for magnetic confinement. Experiments continued and specialized machines were developed to test separately improvements to the tokamak concept needed for the production of energy. At the same time, research into plasma physics and tokamak theory was being undertaken which provides the basis for modern theoretical work. Since then, the tokamak concept has been refined by a world-wide effort and today we look forward to the successful operation of ITER. (Some figures in this article are in colour only in the electronic version) At the opening ceremony of the United Nations First In the USSR, NF research began in 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Radiation and Nuclear Disasters in the Former USSR
    History of radiation and nuclear disasters in the former USSR M.V.Malko Institute of Power Engineering National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Akademicheskaya Str.15, Minsk, 220 000, Republic of Belarus E-mail: [email protected] Abstracts. The report describes the history of radiation and nuclear accidents in the former USSR. These accidents accompanied development of military and civilian use of nuclear energy. Some of them as testing of the first Soviet nuclear, Kyshtym radiation accident, radiation contamination of the Karachai lake and the Techa river, nuclear accidents at the Soviet submarine on August 10, 1985 in the Chazhma Bay (near Vladivostok) as well as nuclear accidents on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl NPP were of large scale causing significant radiological problems for many hundreds thousands of people. There were a number of important reasons of these and other accidents. The most important among them were time pressure by development of nuclear weapon, an absence of required financial and material means for adequate management of problems of nuclear and radiation safety, and inadequate understanding of harmful interaction of ionizing radiation on organism as well as a hypersecrecy by realization of projects of military and civilian use of nuclear energy in the former USSR. Introduction. The first nuclear reactor in the USSR reached the critical state on the 25 December 1946 [1] or 4 years later than reactor constructed by Enrico Fermi [2]. The first Soviet reactor was developed at the Laboratory N2 in Moscow (later I.V.Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy). This was a very important step in a realization of the Soviet military atomic program that began in September 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De
    Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research P. STOTT Association Euratom-CEA, Centre de Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France. This article gives a short overview of the origins of nuclear fusion and of its development as a potential source of terrestrial energy. 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, at the dawn of the twentieth century, physicists did not understand the source of the Sun‘s energy. Although classical physics had made major advances during the nineteenth century and many people thought that there was little of the physical sciences left to be discovered, they could not explain how the Sun could continue to radiate energy, apparently indefinitely. The law of energy conservation required that there must be an internal energy source equal to that radiated from the Sun‘s surface but the only substantial sources of energy known at that time were wood or coal. The mass of the Sun and the rate at which it radiated energy were known and it was easy to show that if the Sun had started off as a solid lump of coal it would have burnt out in a few thousand years. It was clear that this was much too shortœœthe Sun had to be older than the Earth and, although there was much controversy about the age of the Earth, it was clear that it had to be older than a few thousand years. The realization that the source of energy in the Sun and stars is due to nuclear fusion followed three main steps in the development of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Scientist: Frank Von Hippel's Adventures in Nuclear Arms Control
    JOURNAL FOR PEACE AND NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1698504 Citizen Scientist: Frank von Hippel’s Adventures in Nuclear Arms Control PART 2. Engaging with nuclear-weapons policy Frank von Hippel and Tomoko Kurokawa ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This section covers von Hippel’s first engagement with nuclear- Received 11 September 2019 weapons issues, starting with a review of a US Secretary of Defense’s Accepted 26 November 2019 fi claim that a Soviet nuclear rst strike on US nuclear weapons would kill KEYWORDS – ff only 15,000 25,000 people, through his e orts to revive the proposal Limited nuclear war; spent for a treaty to ban the production of more plutonium and highly- fuel reprocessing; nuclear- enriched uranium for nuclear weapons, and ending with the begin- weapons freeze movement; ning of a collaboration with a group of Gorbachev’s advisors to end the automobile energy Cold War. It also includes his and his colleagues’ engagement in the efficiency; fissile material successful effort to end the US government’s promotion of of a nuclear production cutoff weapons material, plutonium, as a nuclear fuel, and a failed effort to require the doubling of the average fuel efficiency of US automobiles. Limited Nuclear War Tomoko Kurakawa (TK): Before you left the National Research Council in 1975, did you do any work related to nuclear-weapon policy? Frank von Hippel (FvH): I did. It related to the new 10-warhead MX intercontinental ballistic missile1 that then Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger was promoting. Schlesinger presented his arguments to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee in March 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Methods for Calculation of Perturbations in Nuclear Reactors the Monte Carlo Estimation of the Effect of Uncertainties in T
    Abstracts Journal “Problems of Nuclear Science and Engineering. Series: Physics of Nuclear Reactors” issue No.4, 2014 UDC 519.6: 621.039.51 Some Methods for Calculation of Perturbations in Nuclear Reactors B.D. Abramov FSUE “SSC RF-IPPE”, 1, Bondarenko Sq., Obninsk, Kaluga Region, 249033 Some methods for calculation of local perturbations of neutrons fields and effects of reactivity accompany- ing them in nuclear reactors are developed. Theorems of existence and uniqueness of the solutions are estab- lished, schemes of numerical realization of offered methods are brought. Key Words: Neutron Transport Theory, Perturbations Theory, Reactivity Effects in Nuclear Reactors. UDC 621.039 The Monte Carlo Estimation of the Effect of Uncertainties in the Input Data for the Transport Equation Solving by the MCU Code D.S. Oleynik NRC “Kurchatov Institute”, 1, Kurchatov Sq., Moscow, 123182 Direct taking into account the initial data uncertainty is realized in the new version of tally module of the MCU code. This approach is recommended by international standard “A Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement” (ISO 13005). The new module allows calculating the effect of uncertainties in input quantities for neutron characteristics of core. These uncertainties are usually caused by technological tolerances. Devel- oped code is adapted to parallel computing that drastically decreases calculation time. Testing is performed by means of a simplified model of the Godiva bare-sphere critical experiment and infinite lattices of vari- ous fuel assemblies (VVER-440, VVER-1000 and VVER-1200). The results of calculation is com- pared with published MCNP5 ones (for Godiva experiment) and with RADAR engineering code ones.
    [Show full text]
  • State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom
    STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM. STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM. PERFORMANCE IN 2019 PERFORMANCE IN 2019 PERFORMANCE OF STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM IN 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Report Profile 4 CHAPTER 7. DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERN SEA ROUTE 122 7.1. Escorting Vessels and Handling Cargo Traffic along the Northern Sea Route 127 CHAPTER 1. OUR ACHIEVEMENTS 6 7.2. Construction of New Icebreakers 128 History of the Russian Nuclear Industry 8 7.3. New Products 128 ROSATOM Today 10 7.4. Digitization of Operations 128 Key Results in 2019 14 7.5. Activities of FSUE Hydrographic Enterprise 129 Key Events in 2019 15 7.6. Plans for 2020 and for the Medium Term 130 Address by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board 16 Address by the Director General 17 CHAPTER 8. EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES 132 Address by a Stakeholder Representative 18 8.1. Corporate Governance 135 Financial and Economic Results 20 8.2. Risk Management 141 8.3. Performance of Government Functions 155 CHAPTER 2. STRATEGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE 22 8.4. Financial and Investment Management 158 2.1. Business Strategy until 2030 24 8.5. ROSATOM Production System 164 2.2. Sustainable Development Management 28 8.6. Procurement Management 168 2.3. Value Creation and Business Model 34 8.7. Internal Control System 172 8.8. Prevention of Corruption and Other Offences 174 CHAPTER 3. CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT 40 3.1. Markets Served by ROSATOM 42 CHAPTER 9. DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN POTENTIAL 176 3.2. International Cooperation 55 AND INFRASTRUCTURE 3.3. International Business 63 9.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Research Centre Kurchatov Institute Dr.Sergey
    EGEE kick-off, April, 19th, 2004 The Russian Research Centre www.eu-egee.org Kurchatov Institute Partner Introduction Dr.Sergey Teryaev RRC KI EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST-2003-508833 Contents • RRC KI history, current activities • Russian HEP institutes, networks • RRC KI Network activity <event>, <date> - 2 History of the Kurchatov Institute • The Russian Research Centre Kurchatov Institute founded in 1943 has a rich history. All 55 years of the Institute life are marked with historically valuable events important not only for Russia but also for the whole present-day world. They have science, politics, particular human destinies got mixed up. • Laboratory No.2 of the USSR Academy of Sciences - 12.04.1943 100 persons • Russian Research Center Kurchatov Institute -01.01.2002 5300 persons: engineers - 1850 Workes - 1050 Research workers - 2400. RAS Members - 17 Doctors and Candidates of Sciences - 1015 ….. • …… –…. <event>, <date> - 3 Main Direction of the R&D Activity The Russian Research Centre Kurchatov Institute has available a high- capacity high-resource research and experimental basis which includes large and sophisticated installations (plasma thermonuclear installations, various-purpose nuclear reactors, various-type accelerators, test facilities and other unique research equipment) as well as designing basis, large pilot-scale production. This extensive basis permits a full cycle of studies from the birth of scientific idea to development of technology and fabrication of finished product to be accomplished. • Safe development of Nuclear Power (Nuclear Power and its Fuel Cycle) • Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion and Plasma Processes • Nuclear Physics • Solid State Physics and Superconductivity • Communications Network for science and ISP (RIPN, Relcom) <event>, <date> - 4 RussianRussian HEPHEP InstitutionsInstitutions Russian Research Center "Kurchatov Institute Moscow, Russia Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of Russian Acad.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years on from ZETA …
    Sixty years on from ZETA … Chris Warrick The Sun … What is powering it? Coal? Lifetime 3,000 years Gravitational Energy? Lifetime 30 million years – Herman Von Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin - mid 1800s The Sun … Suggested the Earth is at least 300 million years old – confirmed by geologists studying rock formations … The Sun … Albert Einstein (Theory of Special Relativity) and Becquerel / Curie’s work on radioactivity – suggested radioactive decay may be the answer … But the Sun comprises hydrogen … The Sun … Arthur Eddington proposed that fusion of hydrogen to make helium must be powering the Sun “If, indeed, the subatomic energy is being freely used to maintain their great furnaces, it seems to bring a little nearer to fulfilment our dream of controlling this latent power for the well-being of the human race – or for its suicide” Cambridge – 1930s Cockcroft Walton accelerator, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge. But huge energy losses and low collisionality Ernest Rutherford : “The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing . Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Oxford – 1940s Peter Thonemann – Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford. ‘Pinch’ experiment in glass, then copper tori. First real experiments in sustaining plasma and magnetically controlling them. Imperial College – 1940s George Thomson / Alan Ware – Imperial College London then Aldermaston. Also pinch experiments, but instabilities started to be observed – especially the rapidly growing kink instability. AERE Harwell Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE) Harwell – Hangar 7 picked up fusion research. Fusion is now classified. Kurchatov visit 1956 ZETA ZETA Zero Energy Thermonuclear Apparatus Pinch experiment – but with added toroidal field to help with instabilities and pulsed DC power supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert
    SE0100262 TRITA-A Report ISSN 1102-2051 VETENSKAP OCH ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE IONST KTH Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert Research and Training programme on CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS (Association EURATOM/NFR) FUSION PLASMA PHYSICS ALFV N LABORATORY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK TRITA-ALF-2001-04 ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert VETENSKAP OCH KONST Stockholm, June 2001 The Alfven Laboratory Division of Fusion Plasma Physics Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (Association EURATOM/NFR) Printed by Alfven Laboratory Fusion Plasma Physics Division Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION RESEARCH DURING HALF A CENTURY Bo Lehnert Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT A review is given on the historical development of research on plasma physics and controlled fusion. The potentialities are outlined for fusion of light atomic nuclei, with respect to the available energy resources and the environmental properties. Various approaches in the research on controlled fusion are further described, as well as the present state of investigation and future perspectives, being based on the use of a hot plasma in a fusion reactor. Special reference is given to the part of this work which has been conducted in Sweden, merely to identify its place within the general historical development. Considerable progress has been made in fusion research during the last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization Models of a Two-Component Nuclear Energy System with Thermal and Fast Reactors in a Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle*
    Nuclear Energy and Technology 5(1): 39–45 DOI 10.3897/nucet.5.33981 Research Article Optimization models of a two-component nuclear energy system with thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle* Andrey A. Andrianov1, Ilya S. Kuptsov1, Tatyana A. Osipova1, Olga N. Andrianova2, Tatyana V. Utyanskaya3 1 Obninsk Institute of Nuclear Power Engineering, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, 1 Studgorodok, Obninsk, Kaluga reg., 249040 Russia 2 JSC “SSC RF-IPPE n.a. A.I. Leypunsky”, 1, Bondarenko sq., Obninsk, Kaluga reg., 249033 Russia 3 JSC “Engineering Center of Nuclear Containers”, Bldg 1, Marshala Biryuzova st., Moscow, 123298 Russia Corresponding author: Andrey A. Andrianov ([email protected]) Academic editor: G. Tikhomirov ♦ Received 26 November 2018 ♦ Accepted 20 January 2019 ♦ Published 20 March 2019 Citation: Andrianov AA, Kuptsov IS, Osipova TA, Andrianova ON, Utyanskaya TV (2019) Optimization models of a two-component nuclear energy system with thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle. Nuclear Energy and Technology 5(1): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.5.33981 Abstract The article presents a description and some illustrative results of the application of two optimization models for a two-component nuclear energy system consisting of thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle. These mod- els correspond to two possible options of developing Russian nuclear energy system, which are discussed in the expert community: (1) thermal and fast reactors utilizing uranium and mixed oxide fuel, (2) thermal reactors utilizing uranium oxide fuel and fast reactors utilizing mixed nitride uranium-plutonium fuel. The optimization models elaborated using the IAEA MESSAGE energy planning tool make it possible not only to optimize the nuclear energy system structure according to the economic criterion, taking into account resource and infrastructural constraints, but also to be used as a basis for developing multi-objective, stochastic and robust optimization models of a two-component nuclear energy system.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Fuel Cycle and P&T
    NEA NUCLEAR INNOVATION 2050 R&D COOPERATIVE PROGRAMME PROPOSAL Advanced Fuel Cycle and P&T H Aït Abderrahim (SCK•CEN), Anzhelika Khaperskaya (Rosatom), Roger Garbil (DG RTD, EU), Shigeaki Okajima (JAEA), Kazufumi Tsujimoto (JAEA), Kenji Nishihara (JAEA), Jean-Paul Glatz (EC-JRC, Karlsruhe), Stéphane Bourg (CEA), T. Todd (INL), Alex Mueller (ACM Consult GmbH), Reviewing by S. Cornet + WPFC/EGFRC TITLE/SUBJECT: Advanced Fuel Cycle and P&T steps towards possible industrialisation from 2040 on 1. Justification of the selection (1/2 page) Today, nuclear power produces 11 percent of the world’s electricity. Nuclear power plants produce virtually no greenhouse gases or air pollutants during their operation. Emissions over their entire life cycle are very low. Nuclear energy’s potential is essential to achieving a deeply decarbonized energy future in many regions of the world as of today and for decades to come, the main value of nuclear energy lies in its potential contribution to decarbonizing the power sector. Nuclear energy’s future role, however, is highly uncertain for several reasons: chiefly, escalating costs and, the persistence of historical challenges such as spent fuel and radioactive waste management. In Europe, 2500 t of spent fuel are discharged annually from reactors containing Plutonium, and Minor Actinides, namely neptunium (Np), americium (Am) and curium (Cm), and long-lived fission products (LLFPs). The long-term management of waste at the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle remains one of the most critical issues affecting the acceptance of nuclear power and consequently the challenges associated with the global expansion of nuclear power.
    [Show full text]