MOVEMENT of CAMP Idps 18 OCTOBER – 15 NOVEMBER 2020 DEPARTURE of Idps from CAMP SETTINGS1

DTM EMERGENCY TRACKING MOVEMENT OF CAMP IDPs 18 OCTOBER – 15 NOVEMBER 2020 DEPARTURE OF IDPs FROM CAMP SETTINGS1 10% of all camp IDPs departed a formal camp3 Departures (18 Oct - 15 Nov) 82% of Baghdad camp IDPs departed a formal camp4 4,965 Households 100% of Kerbala camp IDPs departed a formal camp 23,988 Individuals2 12% of Anbar camp IDPs departed a formal camp 26% of Diyala camp IDPs departed a formal camp 22% of Ninewa camp IDPs departed a formal camp 26% of Salah al-Din camp IDPs departed a formal camp DTM has continued to track movement of IDPs from camps to non-camp settings. A total of 4,965 households (23,988 individuals) have been tracked between 18 October and 15 November 2020 following the recent closures of some camps. While the most of departures have taken place in Ninewa Governorate, departures have also been recorded from camp settings in Baghdad, Kerbala, Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk and Salah al-Din Governorates. According to the latest CCCM Situation Report (Nov 16), 11 camps and informal sites have been closed since mid-October, with two camps reclassified as informal sites (HTC in Anbar, and Zayona in Baghdad). NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS PER CAMP OF DEPARTURE 1594 1509 658 329 151 179 69 102 54 85 21 100 36 5 28 45 AAF HTC Al-Ahel Jad'ah 1 Jad'ah 5 Jad'ah Yahyawa Khazer M1 Al Wand 2 Al Wand 1 Al-Kawthar Eshaqi (site) Muskar Saad Muskar As Salamyiah 2 Al Shams (site) Al-Nabi Younis Hamam Al Alil 2 Hamam Alil Al Abu Ghraib Mada'in Al- Falluja Baquba Khanaqin Mosul Al-Hamdaniya Daquq Balad Hindiya Baghdad Kerbala Anbar Diyala Ninewa Kirkuk SAD RETURNEES AND IDPS BY GOVERNORATES OF DEPARTURE AND ARRIVAL GOVERNORATE OF DEPARTURE GOVERNORATE OF ARRIVAL 1 Unless specified otherwise, camp settings include both formal camps and big informal sites. 2 In most cases, data on the number of individuals departing camps and arriving to new locations was collected. Where this could not be collected, the number was estimated based on an average household size of 6. 3 Calculations based on the Iraq CCCM Camp Master List and Population Flow, October 2020. 4 Al Shams Complex and Eshaqi Complex are informal sites and therefore these households are not included in the overall number of in-camp IDPs in Baghdad and Salah al-Din respectively. ARRIVAL OF IDPs FROM CAMPS TO NON-CAMP SETTINGS In the same reporting period, 1,528 households (7,960 individuals) were recorded as Arrivals 1,528 Households arriving in non-camp settings in the Governorates of Anbar, Baghdad, Kerbala, Ninewa, 7,960 Individuals Diyala, Salah al-Din and Erbil. Khanaqin district in Diyala and Telafar, Mosul and Ba’aj in Ninewa received the highest number of camps IDPs. Of the households who departed 66% as returnees camps, 34% have not returned to their location of origin, while 1,024 households 34% as out-of- (66%) have left the camps and returned to their respective areas of origin. DTM teams camp IDPs reported that some of the IDPs coming from camps in Ninewa who could not return to their area of origin resorted to living in tents and mud houses. NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS PER DISTRICT OF ARRIVAL AFTER CAMP DEPARTURE 278 254 198 147 112 82 91 56 57 49 51 40 32 6 1 10 10 5 3 14 2 7 1 2 14 1 5 Kifri Erbil Heet Balad Ra'ua Sinjar Hatra Tilkaif Mosul Falluja Telafar Baquba Ramadi Al-Ba'aj Mada'in Kerbala Al-Ka'im Thawra2 Al Khalis Al Al-Rutba Khanaqin Makhmur Al-Shirqat Muqdadiya Abu Ghraib Al-Muqdadiya Al-Hamdaniya Anbar Baghdad Kerbala Ninewa Diyala Salah al-Din Erbil © 2020 International Organization for Migration (IOM) The information in this report is the result of data collected by IOM field teams and complements information provided by governmental and other entities in Iraq. IOM Iraq endeavors to keep this information as up to date and accurate as possible, but makes no claim—expressed or implied—on the completeness, accuracy and suitability of the information provided through this report. Names and IOM Iraq thanks the U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Population, boundaries on DTM information products do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Refugees and Migration (PRM) for its continued support..

Load more