DOCSLIB.ORG

Ord River Floodplain, Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). This Ramsar Information Sheet has been converted to meet the 2009 – 2012 format, but the RIS content has not been updated in this conversion. The new format seeks some additional information which could not yet be included. This information will be added when future updates of this Ramsar Information Sheet are completed. Until then, notes on any changes in the ecological character of the Ramsar site may be obtained from the Ecological Character Description (if completed) and other relevant sources. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. Compiled by the Western Australian Department of DD MM YY Conservation & Land Management (DCLM) in 1990. Updated by Roger Jaensch, Wetlands International - Oceania, on behalf of DCLM in 1998, and by DCLM staff in 2000 and Designation date Site Reference Number 2003. All inquiries should be directed to Jim Lane, DCLM, 14 Queen Street, Busselton WA 6280, Australia, (Tel: +61-8-9752-1677; Fax: +61-8-9752-1432; email: [email protected]). 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: November 2003 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention. Alternative names, including in local language(s), should be given in parentheses after the precise name. Ord River Floodplain, Western Australia 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: Ord River Floodplain, Western Australia was designated on 7 June 1990 The previous RIS was dated 1998. This RIS is for (tick one box only): a) Designation of a new Ramsar site ; or b) Updated information on an existing Ramsar site 6. For RIS updates only, changes to the site since its designation or earlier update: a) Site boundary and area The Ramsar site boundary and site area are unchanged: or Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 If the site boundary has changed: i) the boundary has been delineated more accurately ; or ii) the boundary has been extended ; or iii) the boundary has been restricted** and/or If the site area has changed: i) the area has been measured more accurately ; or ii) the area has been extended ; or iii) the area has been reduced** ** Important note: If the boundary and/or area of the designated site is being restricted/reduced, the Contracting Party should have followed the procedures established by the Conference of the Parties in the Annex to COP9 Resolution IX.6 and provided a report in line with paragraph 28 of that Annex, prior to the submission of an updated RIS. b) Describe briefly any major changes to the ecological character of the Ramsar site, including in the application of the Criteria, since the previous RIS for the site: 7. Map of site: Refer to Annex III of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines, for detailed guidance on provision of suitable maps, including digital maps. a) A map of the site, with clearly delineated boundaries, is included as: i) a hard copy (required for inclusion of site in the Ramsar List): ; ii) an electronic format (e.g. a JPEG or ArcView image) ; iii) a GIS file providing geo-referenced site boundary vectors and attribute tables . b) Describe briefly the type of boundary delineation applied: e.g. the boundary is the same as an existing protected area (nature reserve, national park, etc.), or follows a catchment boundary, or follows a geopolitical boundary such as a local government jurisdiction, follows physical boundaries such as roads, follows the shoreline of a waterbody, etc. 8. Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude, in degrees and minutes): Provide the coordinates of the approximate centre of the site and/or the limits of the site. If the site is composed of more than one separate area, provide coordinates for each of these areas. Latitude: 14° 51’ S to 15° 46’ S; Longitude: 128° 12’ E to 128° 33’ E 9. General location: Include in which part of the country and which large administrative region(s) the site lies and the location of the nearest large town. Ord River Floodplain is in the Shire of Wyndham-East Kimberley (local authority) in the State of Western Australia (population ca. 1.95 million in 2003). It is 8 km east of the town of Wyndham (population ca. 1000 in 2003). The Ramsar Site as originally nominated in February 1990 comprised: former Nature Reserves 30866, l058, l059, 31636 (now amalgamated as Nature Reserve 42155) and 31967; areas that at the time were proposed for reservation and have since been added to Nature Reserve 31967; and some adjacent marine and estuarine waters and tidal land of Cambridge Gulf and the lower Ord River. The main wetland features of the Site therefore were (and are) the floodplain and associated wetlands of the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 3 lower Ord River and of Parry Creek as well as the intertidal wetlands associated with the East Arm of Cambridge Gulf and the “False Mouths of the Ord”. The Site was extended (see maps) in 2001 to include areas that were added to Nature Reserve 42155 following the original Site nomination. The extension comprises most of the land between the former eastern/southern boundary of the Site and the present eastern/southern boundary of Nature Reserve 42155. Two small areas of the Nature Reserve (totaling approximately 120 hectares on the eastern boundary) were not included in the Site extension because they were subject to a proposal for changes to the Reserve boundary, involving a combination of excisions and additions to the Reserve. A proposed road reserve, intended to accommodate Parry Creek Road (which is currently within the Nature Reserve), is also not included in the Site. The 2001 extension brought more of the wetlands associated with Goose Creek (e.g. part of Wild Goose Lagoon) and upper Parry Creek (waterholes and gorge wetlands) into the Ramsar Site. 10. Elevation: (in metres: average and/or maximum & minimum) Approximately at sea level. 11. Area: (in hectares) 141 453 ha 12. General overview of the site: Provide a short paragraph giving a summary description of the principal ecological characteristics and importance of the wetland. A large system of river, seasonal creek, tidal mudflat and floodplain wetlands that supports extensive stands of mangroves important for salt-water crocodiles, and a large number and diversity of waterbirds. 13. Ramsar Criteria: Tick the box under each Criterion applied to the designation of the Ramsar site. See Annex II of the Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for the Criteria and guidelines for their application (adopted by Resolution VII.11). All Criteria which apply should be ticked. 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 8 • 9 14. Justification for the application of each Criterion listed in 13 above: Provide justification for each Criterion in turn, clearly identifying to which Criterion the justification applies (see Annex II for guidance on acceptable forms of justification). Criterion 1: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it contains a representative, rare, or unique example of a natural or near-natural wetland type found within the appropriate biogeographic region. [Justification against former Criterion 1(a) under the Pre-1999 Criteria]: The Site is the best example in Western Australia of an extensive system of wetlands (e.g. grass- dominated wetland) associated with the floodplain and estuary of a major tropical river. Criterion 2: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered species or threatened ecological communities. [Justification against former Criterion 2(a) under the Pre-1999 Criteria]: The Site supports a viable population of the globally threatened Saltwater Crocodile Crocodylus porosus and the nationally vulnerable Freshwater Sawfish Microdon pristis. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 4 Criterion 3: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it supports populations of plant and/or animal species important for maintaining the biological diversity of a particular biogeographic region. [Justification against former Criterion 2(b) under the Pre-1999 Criteria]: The Site includes the most biologically diverse, contiguous floodplain and mangroves system in Western Australia. The Site’s mangrove system is the largest (in terms of plant size), most species diverse and structurally complex mangrove system in the Kimberley (to date, 14 of the 16 species of mangrove found in Western Australia have been recorded). Large numbers of waterbirds from most waterbird families, particularly ducks and waders (shorebirds), use the Site (between 13 – 20 000 individuals from up to 54 species have been recorded). In good rainfall years, Parry Lagoons and other seasonal wetlands constitute one of the major breeding areas for waterbirds in the Kimberley region. Criterion 5: A wetland should be considered internationally important if it regularly supports 20,000 or more waterbirds. [Justification against former Criterion 3(b) under the Pre-1999 Criteria]: More than 20 000 waterbirds were recorded using the seasonal wetlands on the Ord River Floodplain and Parry Lagoon in 1980 and 1986 (see item 18). Available information indicates that conditions are suitable for use by more than 20 000 waterbirds at least several times within a 25 year period; in the context of wetland availability in Western Australia this is considered sufficient evidence of regular use by 20 000 waterbirds. 15. Biogeography (required when Criteria 1 and/or 3 and /or certain applications of Criterion 2 are applied to the designation): Name the relevant biogeographic region that includes the Ramsar site, and identify the biogeographic regionalisation system that has been applied.
Recommended publications
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World

    A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
  • Australian Ramsar Site Guidelines

    Australian Ramsar Site Guidelines

    AUSTRALIAN RAMSAR SITE NOMINATION GUIDELINES Module 4 of the National Guidelines for Ramsar Wetlands— Implementing the Ramsar Convention in Australia WAT251.0912 Published by While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population the contents of this publication are factually correct, the and Communities Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy GPO Box 787 or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable CANBERRA ACT 2601 for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Endorsement Endorsed by the Standing Council on Environment and Citation Water, 2012. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 and Communities (2012). Australian Ramsar Site Nomination Guidelines. Module 4 of the National Guidelines for Ramsar Information contained in this publication may be copied or Wetlands—Implementing the Ramsar Convention in Australia. reproduced for study, research, information or educational Australian Government Department of Sustainability, purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. source. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: ISBN: 978-1-921733-66-6 Assistant Secretary The publication can be accessed at http://www.environment. Aquatic Systems Policy Branch gov.au/water/topics/wetlands/ramsar-convention/australian-
  • Waterlines-74 National Waterbird Assessment

    Waterlines-74 National Waterbird Assessment

    National waterbird assessment RT Kingsford, JL Porter and SA Halse Waterlines Report Series No. 74, March 2012 Waterlines This paper is part of a series of works commissioned by the National Water Commission on key water issues. This work has been undertaken by the Australian Wetlands and Rivers Centre of the University of New South Wales on behalf of the National Water Commission. © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Communications Director, National Water Commission, 95 Northbourne Avenue, Canberra ACT 2600 or email [email protected]. Online/print: ISBN: 978-1-921853-58-6 National waterbird assessment, March 2012 Authors: RT Kingsford, JL Porter and SA Halse Published by the National Water Commission 95 Northbourne Avenue Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6102 6000 Email: [email protected] Date of publication: March 2012 Cover design by: Angelink Front cover image courtesy of Prof RT Kingsford An appropriate citation for this report is: Kingsford RT, Porter JL and Halse SA 2011, National waterbird assessment, Waterlines report, National Water Commission, Canberra Disclaimer This paper is presented by the National Water Commission for the purpose of informing discussion and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Commission. Contents Foreword ix Acknowledgements x Executive summary xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 2 1.2. Project objectives 11 1.3. Report structure 11 2.
  • 2.9 Waterbirds: Identification, Rehabilitation and Management

    2.9 Waterbirds: Identification, Rehabilitation and Management

    Chapter 2.9 — Freshwater birds: identification, rehabilitation and management• 193 2.9 Waterbirds: identification, rehabilitation and management Phil Straw Avifauna Research & Services Australia Abstract All waterbirds and other bird species associated with wetlands, are described including how habitats are used at ephemeral and permanent wetlands in the south east of Australia. Wetland habitat has declined substantially since European settlement. Although no waterbird species have gone extinct as a result some are now listed as endangered. Reedbeds are taken as an example of how wetlands can be managed. Chapter 2.9 — Freshwater birds: identification, rehabilitation and management• 194 Introduction such as farm dams and ponds. In contrast, the Great-crested Grebe is usually associated with large Australia has a unique suite of waterbirds, lakes and deep reservoirs. many of which are endemic to this, the driest inhabited continent on earth, or to the Australasian The legs of grebes are set far back on the body region with Australia being the main stronghold making them very efficient swimmers. They forage for the species. Despite extensive losses of almost completely underwater pursuing fish and wetlands across the continent since European aquatic arthropods such as insects and crustaceans. settlement no extinctions of waterbirds have They are strong fliers but are poor at manoeuvering been recorded from the Australian mainland as in flight and generally prefer to dive underwater a consequence. However, there have been some to escape avian predators or when disturbed by dramatic declines in many populations and several humans. Flights between wetlands, some times species are now listed as threatened including over great distances, are carried out under the cover the Australasian Bittern, Botaurus poiciloptilus of darkness when it is safe from attack by most (nationally endangered).
  • A Partial Classification of Waterfowl (Anatidae) Based on Single-Copy Dna

    A Partial Classification of Waterfowl (Anatidae) Based on Single-Copy Dna

    A PARTIAL CLASSIFICATION OF WATERFOWL (ANATIDAE) BASED ON SINGLE-COPY DNA CORT S. MADSEN, KEVIN P. MCHUGH, AND SIWO R. DE KLOET Instituteof MolecularBiophysics, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 USA ABSTR^CT.--Single-copyDNA-DNA hybridizationwas used to establishphylogenetic re- lationshipsamong 13 speciesof waterfowl (Anatidae) chosenfrom 10 tribes. On the basisof UPGMA clusteringof ATtodistances, we suggestthat the tribes Anatini, Aythyini, Tadornini, Mergini, and Cairinini diverged more recently than the Anserini, Stictonettini,Oxyurini, Dendrocygnini,and Anseranatini.The FreckledDuck (Stictonettanaevosa, tribe Stictonettini) is only distantlyrelated to the other Anatidae.Presumably the lineage divergedvery early. The sheldgeese(tribe Tadornini) and the true geese(Anserini) are only remotely related. The Oxyurini, consideredto be in the subfamilyAnatinae, is remotely related to the other Anatidae. The Dendrocygnini form an isolatedtribe with no closerelationship to the swans and geese(subfamily Anserinae). We found that the screamers(Anhimidae) are distantly related to the Anatidae. A method to estimate missing cells in a data matrix of pairwise distancesis presented. ReceivedI May 1987,accepted 16 February1988. RECENTLY,nucleic acid sequenceanalysis has up about 10-40% of the total DNA (Eden et al. been usedto estimaterelationships of many or- 1978) but containsonly a small percentageof ganisms. The analysis can include direct se- the total sequencediversity. The remaining60- quencing of individual cloned genes
  • Ord River and Parry Lagoons Nature Reserves 2010 Draft Management Plan

    Ord River and Parry Lagoons Nature Reserves 2010 Draft Management Plan

    Ord River and Parry Lagoons Nature Reserves 2010 Draft Management Plan R N V E M E O N G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T ORD RIVER AND PARRY LAGOONS NATURE RESERVES Management Plan 2010 Department of Environment and Conservation Conservation Commission of Western Australia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This management plan was prepared by Department planning officer Sarah Greenwood with assistance from Paul McCluskey and Laurina Bullen. Assistance was provided by Daryl Moncrieff, Troy Sinclair, Scott Goodson, Allan Thomson and David Grosse. The planning team would like to thank the many other Departmental staff that contributed to and commented on sections of this plan. Special thanks to Jennifer Hale, ecologist and author of the Ecological Character Description for the Ord River Floodplain Ramsar site. Front cover images: Main image: Boardwalk at Marlgu Billabong. Photo by DEC. Other images: Frog; Telegraph Hill interpretive sign. Photos by DEC. ii INVITATION TO COMMENT This draft management plan gives you the opportunity to provide information, express your opinion, suggest alternatives and have your say on how Ord River and Parry Lagoons nature reserves and proposed additions will be managed over the next 10 years. What to consider In making your submission, it is important to understand that legislation and policy impose certain obligations on the Department of Environment and Conservation to manage lands and waters vested with the Conservation Commission of Western Australia and that there may be little room to manage some issues outside of these constraints and responsibilities.
  • The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways

    The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways

    The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways There are 208 major waterways in Western Australia with a combined length of more than 25000 km. Forty-eight have been identified as 'wild rivers' due to their near pristine condition. Waterways and their fringing vegetation have important ecological, economic and cultural values. They provide habitat for birds, frogs, reptiles, native fish and macroinvertebrates and form important wildlife corridors between patches of remnant bush. Estuaries, where river and ocean waters mix, connect the land to the sea and have their own unique array of aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna. Waterways, and water, have important spiritual and cultural significance for Aboriginal people. Many waterbodies such as rivers, soaks, springs, rock holes and billabongs have Aboriginal sites associated with them. Waterways became a focal point for explorers and settlers with many of the State’s towns located near them. Waterways supply us with food and drinking water, irrigation for agriculture and water for aquaculture and horticulture. They are valuable assets for tourism and An impacted south-west river section - salinisation and erosion on the upper Frankland River. Photo are prized recreational areas. S. Neville ECOTONES. Many are internationally recognised and protected for their ecological values, such as breeding grounds and migration stopovers for birds. WA has several Ramsar sites including lakes Gore and Warden on the south coast, the Ord River floodplain in the Kimberley and the Peel Harvey Estuarine system, which is the largest Ramsar site in the south west of WA. Some waterways are protected within national parks for their ecosystem values and beauty.
  • Eton Range Realignment Project ATTACHMENT 2 to EPBC Ref: 2015/7552 Preliminary Documentation Residual Impact Assessment and Offset Proposal - 37

    Eton Range Realignment Project ATTACHMENT 2 to EPBC Ref: 2015/7552 Preliminary Documentation Residual Impact Assessment and Offset Proposal - 37

    APPENDIX 3: KSAT RESULTS – PELLET COUNTS Table 5: KSAT results per habitat tree. Species Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Total Eucalyptus tereticornis 9 30 16 - 42 7 104 Eucalyptus crebra 91 16 29 2 0 25 163 Corymbia clarksoniana 11 0 0 1 4 5 21 Corymbia tessellaris 5 0 0 0 0 20 25 Corymbia dallachiana - 12 - - - - 12 Corymbia intermedia - 3 1 0 11 - 15 Corymbia erythrophloia - - 0 - 0 - 0 Eucalyptus platyphylla - - - 0 0 0 0 Lophostemon - - - 0 0 - 0 suaveolens Total 116 61 46 3 57 57 Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 22 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder APPENDIX 4: SITE PHOTOS The following images were taken from the centre of each BioCondition quadrat and represent a north east south west aspect, top left to bottom right. Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 23 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 3: BioCondition quadrat 1 (RE11.3.4/11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 24 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 4: BioCondition quadrat 2 (RE11.3.4/11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 25 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 5: BioCondition quadrat 3 (RE11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 26 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 6: BioCondition quadrat 4 (RE11.3.9) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 27 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 7: BioCondition quadrat 5 (RE11.3.25) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 28 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 8: BioCondition quadrat 6 (RE11.12.3/11.3.4/11.3.9) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 29 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Appendix E: Desktop Assessment for Potential
  • Referral to Epa

    Referral to Epa

    Carlton Plain – Stage 1 3,086 ha Agricultural Development REFERRAL TO EPA Project Description and Environmental Factors July 2017 Referral to the Western Australian Environmental Protection Authority under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. EPA Reference CMS17140 Prepared for Kimberley Agricultural Investment Pty Ltd by PO Box 149 KUNUNURRA WA 6743 [email protected] Mapping (unless otherwise stated): Rich River Irrigation Developments, 2017. Woodman Environmental Consulting, 2017. Kimberley Boab Consulting, 2017. Disclaimer and Limitation This report has been prepared for Kimberley Agricultural Investment Pty Ltd (KAI) in accordance with the Agreement between KAI and Kimberley Boab Consulting Pty Ltd. The content of this report is limited by the parameters provided by KAI, including scope and timeframes. Kimberley Boab Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any person who is not a party to the Agreement. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property arising from the report and the provision of the services in accordance with the Agreement belongs to KAI. DOCUMENT CONTROL Date Version Reviewed / endorsed by 3 July 2017 Draft Rev A KAI – J Engelke 4 July 2017 Rev A Submitted to EPA for initial review and comment 19 July 2017 Rev B Submitted to EPA 21 July 2017 Rev O Submitted to EPA with minor mapping amendments Carlton Plain Stage 1 – EPA Referral 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Figures 5 Tables 5 Plates 6 Appendices 6 Acronyms
  • Supporting Document

    Supporting Document

    Plate 8 - House Roof Hill: view to hill across proposed infrastructure area 5.4 Potential impacts, predicted outcome and mitigation The proposed Carlton Plain Stage 1 development is not expected to impact substantially on the landform that is House Roof Hill, or the nearby ‘Shed Roof Hill’. Drainage from House Roof Hill will be managed via hillside drains. Minimal clearing of foothill vegetation will be required, given the current state, as shown in Plate 8. Other values, such as terrestrial fauna, are discussed later in this document. Aboriginal heritage assessment and clearance has been provided by Traditional Owners with the support of MG Corporation (June 2017). No landform impacts on House Roof Hill are anticipated. The physical and ecological integrity of House Roof Hill will remain intact. Carlton Plain Stage 1 – EPA Referral 50 6.0 Key Environmental Factor 3 – Terrestrial Environmental Quality 6.1 EPA objective To maintain the quality of land and soils so that environmental values are protected. 6.2 Policy and guidance EPA considerations in relation to the environmental factor ‘Terrestrial Environmental Quality’ include • Application of the mitigation hierarchy to avoid or minimise impacts to terrestrial environmental quality, where possible; • The environmental values supported by soil quality which are potentially impacted, and their significance; • The contaminants of concern and potential pathways through which soil quality may be impacted, and the associated risks to values supported by good soil quality; • The significance
  • Feeding Adaptations in Whistling Ducks (Dendroc ¾Gna )

    Feeding Adaptations in Whistling Ducks (Dendroc ¾Gna )

    FEEDING ADAPTATIONS IN WHISTLING DUCKS (DENDROC ¾GNA ) MICHAEL KENT RYLANDER AND ERIC G. BOLEN WATErFOWl.have radiated into a variety of nichesby evolvingsuch diversefeeding structures as serratedbills for capturingfish (Mergus) and lamellatedbills for sifting food items (Anas and especiallySpatula). Goodmanand Fisher (1962) thus describedand analyzed the feeding apparatus in a number of representativeanatids, placing particular emphasison the bones and musculatureof the head. More recently Kear and Burton (1971) describedin detail the feeding adaptations of the New Zealand Blue Duck (Hymenolaimusmalacorhynchos) in an effort to understandthe functionof this species'bill flap. We recently reported structural adaptationsin the locomotorbehavior (Rylander and Bolen MS) and the foot structure (Bolen and Rylander 1974) in four speciesof whistling ducks: the Black-bellied Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis), the Fulvous Whistling Duck (D. bicolor), the Plumed Whistling Duck (D. eytoni), and the Wandering Whistling Duck (D. arcuata). The distinctiveadaptations for terrestrial and aquatic locomotionin these speciesand their phylogeneticimplica- tions prompted us to examine their feeding apparatusesfor evidenceof parallelevolution between the two speciesrepresenting sympatric popula- tions in North America (D. autumnalisand D. bicolor) and the two speciesthat are sympatricin Australia (D. eytoni and D. arcuata). MATERIALS AND METHODS Our data were obtained from at least two adult specimensof each of the four species. Measurements were made with dial calipers, or in some cases with an ocular micrometer incorporated in a binocular dissecting microscope. To measure the length of the semicircular canal, we carefully removed the roedial part of the periotic bone with a steel cutting burr on a rotary electric tool. Once the semi- circular canal was openedat each end, a human hair was inserted,cut with iridectomy scissorsto a length equal to the canal, then removed from the canal with forceps and measured.
  • Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley Trails Master Plan

    Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley Trails Master Plan

    Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley Trails Master Plan Revised Draft FINAL REPORT | 11 September 2017 Acknowledgements The Wyndham East Kimberley Trails Master Plan has been prepared by TRC Tourism Pty Ltd (www.trctourism.com) for the Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley. Authors: Chris Halstead, Janet Mackay. Disclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith but on the basis that TRC Tourism is not liable to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to in this document. SHIRE OF WYNDHAM EAST KIMBERLEY | TRAILS MASTER PLAN | 11 September, 2017 i Contents Executive Summary IV 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the Master Plan 1 1.2 What are Trails 1 1.3 Trends in Trails Use and Development 3 1.4 Benefits of Trails 3 1.5 State Strategic Trail Blueprint 4 1.6 Trail Classification 5 2 Planning Context 6 2.1 Land Use 6 2.2 Shire Land Use Planning 8 2.3 Economic Development 9 2.4 Tourism Planning 10 3 Demand for Trails 12 3.1 Local Residents 12 3.2 Visitors to the Shire 13 4 Current Situation 15 4.1 Current Trails and Trail Use 15 4.2 Strengths and Challenges 20 4.3 Opportunities 22 5 Vision for the Future 26 5.1 Trail Vision 26 5.2 Guiding Principles 27 6 Proposed Trail Development 29 6.1 Kununurra Lakeside Trails - Lily Creek Lagoon to Diversion Dam via Celebrity Tree Park 30 6.2 Celebrity Tree Park to the Pump House West 34 6.3 Lakeside