Kaikoura Earthquake Recovery Plan for Marlborough District July 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kaikoura Earthquake Recovery Plan for Marlborough District July 2017 Kaikoura Earthquake Recovery Plan for Marlborough District July 2017 (Version 1.3) Trim 16238981 Glossary of Terms CCTV ........................ Closed Circuit Television CDEM ....................... Civil Defence Emergency Management (Marlborough) DOC.......................... Department of Conservation DPMC ....................... Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet ECAN ........................ Environment Canterbury EQC .......................... Earthquake Commission GNS .......................... Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd IR .............................. Inland Revenue KDC .......................... Kaikoura District Council MBIE ......................... Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment MCDEM .................... Ministry of Civil Defence Emergency Management MDC ......................... Marlborough District Council MPI ........................... Ministry of Primary Industries MSD.......................... Ministry of Social Development NGO ......................... Non-Government Organisation NMH ......................... Nelson Marlborough Health NZDF ........................ New Zealand Defence Force NZTA ........................ New Zealand Transport Agency PHO .......................... Public Health Organisation RST .......................... Rural Support Trust TPK........................... Te Puni Kōkiri Context Summary of Event • A M7.8 earthquake occurred north-east of Culverden, New Zealand at 00:02 NZDT on 14 November 2016. • Strong to severe shaking was felt across the Marlborough region and lasted for over two minutes. Ward experienced the highest peak ground acceleration rates in the South Island, experiencing up to 0.9G during the shaking. • MCDEM issued a general tsunami threat message via the National Warning System (NWS) at 0050hrs NZDT on 14 November 2016 and this was cancelled at 1500hrs NZDT on 14 November 2016. A 4m wave was measured however due to low tides and coastal uplift the effects were minimal. • GNS Science have measured fault movements of up to 10m horizontally and 3m vertically. • Aftershocks continued for some time however most of these have been light or weak in felt intensity. Note however that GNS has calculated that over the next 12 months there is a 90% probability of a 6.0 – 6.9M aftershock, a 25% probability of a 7.0 – 7.8M aftershock and a 5% probability of a greater than 7.8M aftershock. • All Marlborough communities have been subjected to earthquake damage. The larger communities affected include Ward, Seddon, Blenheim, and to a lesser degree, Picton. The main impact was to buildings, farm assets including roading, horizontal infrastructure, river control works, the transportation network and the water supply in Ward. • A local state of emergency was not declared in Marlborough for this event and response transitioned into recovery when the Group Recovery Manager took control on Friday 18 November. Recovery Mandate A notice of a National Transition Period (including Marlborough) was put in place on 9 December by the MCDEM Minister and Dave Brash has been appointed as the National Recovery Manager. Dave is based in the MCDEM office in Wellington. The functions of the National Recovery Office are to: 1. Develop a high-level recovery strategy that articulates priorities and approach and becomes the guiding document for government agencies. 2. Provide secretariat support to the All of Government Policy Coordination Group. 3. Focus on relationships with the support of others in central government to support the regional and local recovery efforts. 4. Actively trouble-shoot, problem solve and support government agencies and local authorities to resolve disconnects. 5. Understand and communicate to central government the local and regional community aspirations, limitations and issues which arise. 6. Communicate to local government the priorities of central government. 7. Provide a centralised policy and legal function to support Ministers and agencies on any legislative and policy matters. 8. Support government by providing a single point of contact and coordinated messaging to the public across the recovery. Page 1 As outlined in the Guide to the National CDEM Plan 2015 the role of the appointed Marlborough Group Recovery Manager, Dean Heiford, is that: 1. Smaller-scale recoveries that require co-ordination at the CDEM Group level will be co- ordinated through the person responsible for recovery management for the CDEM Group (the CDEM Group Recovery Manager) and, where necessary, the establishment of a CDEM Group Recovery Office. 2. The Marlborough CDEM Group Recovery Manager: a) Liaises with the National Recovery Manager and, b) Undertakes planning and manages, directs, and co-ordinates activities for the recovery throughout its duration and, if necessary, establishes a CDEM Group Recovery Office to manage the recovery function; and c) Implements appropriate reporting and tracking mechanisms; and d) Works with the Group Controller and the relevant Public Information Manager to ensure a smooth transition between response and recovery; and e) Co-ordinates the recovery activity of the relevant lifeline utilities and agencies; and f) Determines and prioritises major areas of recovery; and g) Develops the group recovery action plan, to establish time-frames for the implementation of recovery activities; and h) Co-ordinates advice on regional assistance; and i) Provides regional-level co-ordination of public information related to recovery. Plans Purpose The purpose of this plan is to provide the framework that will enable the provision of coordinated effort and processes that need to be, or have been, put in place to manage the immediate, medium and long term regeneration of the social, built, economic and natural environments of Marlborough. The Plan also covers recovery actions within the geographical area of KDC from Waipapa to the northern District boundary at Wharanui which the Marlborough Recovery Manager has been given authority by KDC to coordinate on its behalf. This Plan is a living document and will be updated as required. Recovery Goals 1. Hardship is minimised and well-being enhanced for individuals and communities who have suffered losses or damage as a result of the earthquake. 2. Local, national and international confidence is maintained in the region as a place to live, work, visit, invest and do business. 3. Recovery efforts are credible, effective and are supported by robust and transparent processes and systems. 4. Recovery actions are affordable now and into the future for the Marlborough community. 5. The people and organisations of Marlborough and the National Recovery Manager maintain confidence in the local recovery process. 6. Recovery actions improve the resilience of communities and infrastructure to future events. Page 2 Support Agencies & Point of Contact National Recovery Manager (DPMC) – Dave Brash Ministry of Primary Industries – Chris Faulls Marlborough Primary Health – Beth Tester Nelson Marlborough Health – Pete Kara Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment – Joel Browne Ministry of Social Development – Robin Mortimer Marlborough Roads – Steve Murrin Red Cross – Donna Mote Salvation Army – Deane Goldsack Te Puni Kōkiri – Shane Graham Ministry of Vulnerable Children (Oranga Tamariki) – Gail Hamilton Marlborough Federated Farmers – Sharon Parkes Top of the South Rural Support Trust – Colin Gibbs Department of Conservation – Matt Flynn NZDF, Woodbourne – Andrew Hill Marlborough Chamber of Commerce – Stephen Gullery NZTA – Duncan Gibb/Frank Porter Marlborough Roads – Steve Murrin Chorus – Gary Beaumont NZ Wine Growers – Edwin Massey Destination Marlborough – Tracy Johnston MCDEM Regional Emergency Management Advisor – John Lovell Page 3 RECOVERY STRUCTURE National Recovery Manager • Planning • Reporting/ Canterbury Recovery Marlborough Tracking Marlborough • Prioritisation Manager Recovery Manager • District Council Recovery Baden Dean Heiford Action Plan • Public Information • PIM • Coordination/ • Council liaison • CDEM • Exit Strategy Hurunui Recovery Kaikoura Recovery • CEG Manager Manager • Assets & Services Jason Danny Smith Rural Carm Environmental / Built Social Economic Coordinator batural aark belson Bruce tagan beil Ienry Chris Caulls Alan Johnstone • Natural • Housing resources • Commercial/ • Federated • Individuals • Waste/ Industrial • Safety & Farmers • Businesses pollution • Public Buildings & Wellbeing • Rural Support • Infrastructure • Amenity Assets • Health Rural Rural Trust • Government Values • Rural Farm Land • Welfare Jo Buckner • Consultants • Biodiversity & • Lifelines Ecosystems MPI – Lead Coordinator Page 4 Governance A Recovery Group has been established and is chaired by the Group Recovery Manager or alternatively the Marlborough CDEM Group Manager. Members include representatives from support agencies from Public Health, Red Cross, Salvation Army, MPI and TPK plus the Council’s Communications Manager and the Group Welfare Manager. Council’s Community Development Advisor, Strategic Planning and Economic Development Manager, Environmental Science and Monitoring Manager and Marlborough CDEM’s Lifelines Coordinator will have standing invitations to attend to keep the Recovery Team abreast of ongoing developments and issues requiring management or oversight. This Group will meet regularly to ensure that all members are working in an informed, effective and coordinated way which plays to the strengths and skills of each member organisation. It will focus on actions required
Recommended publications
  • AIR Earthquake Model for New Zealand.Indd
    The 2010-2011 Canterbury The AIR Earthquake Earthquake Sequence caused more than NZD 30 billion in insured Model for New losses. This swarm of events, along with the more recent 2016 MW7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, changed the Zealand perception of the region’s seismicity and revealed new data on faults and vulnerabilities. Providing the most up-to-date and comprehensive view of earthquake risk, the AIR Earthquake Model for New Zealand enables stakeholders to prepare for and mitigate potential future impacts with confidence. (! THE AIR EARTHQUAKE MODEL FOR NEW ZEALAND (! (! !( (! !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( (! !( !(!( (!(! !( !( !( !( !( The AIR Earthquake Model for New !( !( (! !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( (!!( !(!( !( (! !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( (! Zealand provides an integrated view of !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( (! !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!((!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !((!!(!(!( (! (! !( !( !(!(!((!!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!((! !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( (!!( (!!( !(!( !( !( !(!( (! !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!((!!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( (! !( !(!( !( !(!( (!(!!(!(!((!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( (!!((! !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( loss from ground shaking, liquefaction, !( ( !( !(!(!(!((!!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!((! !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !((!!( !( !((! !( !(!( !(!(
    [Show full text]
  • The Nelson-Marlborough Region
    SCIENCE & RESEARCH SERIES NO.43 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY: THE NELSON-MARLBOROUGH REGION by Aidan J. Challis Published by Head Office, Department of Conservation, P O Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN 0113-3713 ISBN 0-478-01334-5 © 1991, Department of Conservation National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data Challis, Aidan J. (Aidan John), 1948- Archaeological research and management strategy : the Nelson-Marlborough Region / by Aidan J. Challis. Wellington, N.Z. : Head Office, Dept. of Conservation, c1991. 1 v. (Science & research series, 0113-3713 ; no. 43) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-478-01334-5 1. Historic sites--New Zealand--Nelson-Marlborough Region— Conservation and restoration. 2. Excavations (Archaeology)— New Zealand--Nelson-Marlborough Region. 3. Maori (New Zealand people)--New Zealand--Nelson-Marlborough Region--Antiquities. 4. Nelson-Marlborough Region (N.Z.)--Antiquities. I. New Zealand.Dept. of Conservation. II. Title. III. Series: Science & research series ; no. 43. 363.6909935 Keywords: archaeological zones, Golden Bay, Granite Coast, Mineral Belt, Motueka River, Moutere Hills, site management, site protection, site significance, Clarence, D'Urville, Hundalee, Inland Marlborough, Kaikoura, Nelson, North-West Nelson, Richmond, Sounds, Wairau, NZMS260/P25, NZMS260/P26, NZMS260/N27, NZMS260/N25, NZMS260/M25, NZMS260/N26, NZMS262/9, NZMS260/O28 CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE PROGRESS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2 3 SUMMARY SYNTHESIS OF PRE-EUROPEAN
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Hanmer Springs Kaikoura Marlborough Nelson Tasman West Coast
    2017 Christchurch Hanmer Springs Kaikoura Marlborough Nelson Tasman West Coast 1 Nelson Tasman Marlborough West Coast Kaikoura Hanmer Springs Christchurch 2Marlborough Sounds Mountains, forests and beaches, wildlife, art and wine meet to create magic at the Top of the South Island. We invite you to discover some of New Zealand’s most awe-inspiring scenery, encounter fascinating people, and enjoy exceptional food and wine. This is one of the world’s special places, where a short drive opens up a myriad of attractions. Nature reveals new landscapes at every turn, from golden sands and aquamarine waters, to deep green rainforests and dramatic coastlines. Start in the exciting city of Christchurch and take off for the experience of a lifetime. Ski, bungy jump, hike, bike, surf, swim, spa and golf. Watch whales, dolphins, seals and savour two of New Zealand’s premier wine growing regions. 3 6 Itineraries 10 Christchurch 14 Kaikoura 18 Hanmer Springs & Hurunui 22 Marlborough 26 Nelson Tasman 30 West Coast State Highway 1 North from Kaikoura - Blenheim is currently closed and is expected to re-open in January 2018. This edition covers the current alternative routes for Top of The South. The new routes allow you more time to discover each regions uniqueness that make up the Top of The South. *Correct at time of print Produced by Christchurch International Airport as part of the SOUTH project, Christchurch & Canterbury Tourism, Hurunui Tourism, Destination Kaikoura, Destination Marlborough, Nelson Tasman Tourism, Tourism West Coast 4 Karamea Westport
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Spring Creek
    Marlboroughtown Marshlands Rapaura Ravenscliff Spring Creek Tuamarina Waikakaho Wairau Bar Wairau Pa Marlboroughtown (1878- 1923) Spring Creek (1923-) Pre 1878 1873 4th June 1873 Marlborough Provincial Council meeting included: This morning petitions were presented by Mr Dodson in favour of a vote for. Marlboroughtown School; from 15 ratepayers, against the annexation of a portion of the County of Wairau to the Borough of Blenheim another vote of £100 for a Library and Public Room in Havelock was carried. Mr Dodson moved for a vote of £50 for the School in Marlboroughtown, but a vigorous discussion arose upon it regarding Educational finance, in which Mr Seymour announced that Government would not consent to the various items for school buildings, and upon the particular subject being put to the vote it was lost. 11th June 1873 The following petition, signed by fourteen persons, was presented .to the Provincial Council by Mr George Dodson; To his Honor the Superintendent and Provincial Council of Marlborough, in Council assembled We, the undersigned residents of Spring Creek and Marlboroughtown, do humbly beg that your Honorable Council will take into consideration this our humble petition. That we have for some years felt the necessity of establishing a school in our district, and having done so we now find a great difficulty in providing the necessary funds for its maintenance, and we do humbly pray that your Honorable Council will grant such assistance as will enable us to carry on the school successfully, as without your assistance the school must lapse, We have a Teacher engaged at a salary of Fifty (50) Pounds per annum, and since the commencement of the school the attendance has been steadily increasing showing at the present time a daily average of twenty (20) children.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Tourism on the Maori Community in Kaikoura
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive The Impact of Tourism on the Māori Community in Kaikoura Aroha Poharama Researcher for Ngati Kuri, Ngai Tahu Merepeka Henley Researcher in the Te Whare Tikaka Māori me ka Mahi Kairakahaua Ailsa Smith Lecturer, Division of Environmental Monitoring and Design, Kaupapa Mātauraka Māori Lincoln University. John R Fairweather Senior Research Officer in the Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University. [email protected] David G Simmons Reader in Tourism, Human Sciences Division, Lincoln University. [email protected] September 1998 ISSN 1174-670X Tourism Research and Education Centre (TREC) Report No. 7 Contents LIST OF TABLES iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v GLOSSARY vi SUMMARY viii CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND, RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND METHOD.............. 1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background Information .................................................................... 2 1.3 Research Objectives, Methods and Approach ................................... 4 1.4 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND TO THE MĀORI COMMUNITY OF KAIKOURA................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Introduction........................................................................................ 9 2.2 An
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Regional Land Transport Plan 2021-31
    Not sure Draft Connecting Te Tauihu Regional Land Transport Plan 2021-31 A2570814 1 FOREWORD – CHAIRS OF TE TAUIHU Land transport plays a critical role in connecting our community by providing access to employment, education, recreation and services, as well as enabling the movement of freight in support of business and industry. The Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) is a critical document for Te Tauihu o Te Waka-a-Māui (Te Tauihu) or the “Top of the South Island’ as it underpins all of the region’s road network and transportation planning, as well as the investment priorities over the next six years on both the state highway and local road networks. From a statutory perspective, the RLTP meets the requirements of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 and contributes to the overall aim of the Act. A core requirement of the RLTP is that it must be consistent with the strategic priorities and objectives of the Government’s Policy Statement on Land Transport and take into account the National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. The vision of this RLTP is to have a safe and connected region that is liveable, accessible and sustainable. Te Tauihu is growing and changing, resulting in increasing transport challenges across the region. A strong, coordinated and integrated approach to developing the 10 year transport vision for the region is required to accommodate the impacts of the anticipated levels of growth, whilst maintaining economic activity levels, safety and mode choice. Alongside this RLTP has been development of a Te Tauihu Intergenerational strategy which outlines a vision, tūpuna pono, to be good ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)
    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual-Report-2017-Stepping-Ahead.Pdf
    STEPPING AHEAD ANNUAL REPORT 2017: PART 1of 2 Napier Port is stepping ahead. We’re investing now to build a bright future for our customers, our staff, the economy and our community. CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 2 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT 4 YEAR’S HIGHLIGHTS 6 STEPPING UP 9 FUTURE-PROOFING OUR PORT 10 BUILDING OUR FUTURE 12 A STANDING OVATION 16 OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE 18 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 22 SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM 23 BETTER PEOPLE 24 BETTER ANSWERS 26 HEALTH & SAFETY 28 COMMUNITY 30 ENVIRONMENT 32 END OF AN ERA 34 ANNUAL REPORT 2017: PART 1 of 2 • 1 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT It has been a remarkable year for Napier Port. The efforts of staff and the strong leadership of the senior management team enabled Napier Port to respond swiftly to the disruption in the national supply chain caused by the Kaikoura earthquake. Our people and culture are our most important taonga and investing in them has created a stronger company. The health and safety of every person on and significant investment will be required port is the board’s top priority. Reflecting in order to ensure the port can handle this this, the Health and Safety Committee growth in our cargo base. transitioned to a whole-of-board function Napier Port operates in a global this year, emphasising that every director environment and we must sustain our is accountable when it comes to safety. relevance for both shippers and shipping All directors are now spending time in the lines. Having the right infrastructure in operational environment to strengthen place is critical to ensuring shipping lines our understanding of the risks and continue to take our high-value products safety challenges presented by a port to the world at competitive rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Ratings for Degrading Structural Systems
    194 Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 2, June 2017 PERFORMANCE OF EARLY MASONRY, COB AND CONCRETE BUILDINGS IN THE 14 NOVEMBER 2016 KAIKOURA EARTHQUAKE Dmytro Dizhur1, Marta Giaretton2 and Jason Ingham3 (Submitted February 2017; Reviewed March 2017; Accepted April 2017) ABSTRACT The performance of historic buildings during the 14 November 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand earthquake is reported, focusing on early stone and clay brick masonry buildings, vintage concrete structures, cob cottages, and the non-structural masonry chimneys and veneers of buildings located in the upper part of the South Island (Marlborough and North Canterbury regions). To better document structural response, the intensity of horizontal and vertical ground motion from the nearest recording station is graphically placed alongside the assessed level of damage. In response to numerous strong earthquakes that have previously occurred in the area a large number of highly vulnerable buildings or non-structural building components were previously either seismically retrofitted or demolished, thereby reducing the level of damage and loss of life during the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake. Seismically retrofitted stone and clay brick masonry buildings and cob cottages exhibited good performance, while some vintage concrete structures and partially strengthened cob cottages suffered moderate to extensive levels of damage. A large stock of URM chimneys in Picton, Seddon and Rotherham were previously removed while in other locations chimneys presented a variety of responses. Rural masonry veneer dwellings located in Seddon and Waiau experienced high damage levels, typically resulting in out-of-plane collapse of the masonry veneer. INTRODUCTION region, which were then rebuilt in timber thereby largely contributing to reduce the level of damage and loss of life in The Mw7.8 Kaikoura earthquake struck North Canterbury, the more powerful Mw8.2 Wairarapa (60 km east of New Zealand, at 12:02:56 am local time on 14 November Wellington) earthquake in 1855 [11].
    [Show full text]
  • Hanmer Springs Kaikoura Waipara Christchurch
    Puhi Puhi Scenic Reserve Walkway: PICTON Drive 12kms north of Kaikoura then turn left up the Puhi Puhi Valley, a gravel road. A flat loop track through a scenic reserve, lowland Podocarp forest, PuhiPuhi 30 minutes return. 1 Hanmer Forest Park ST. JAMES Molesworth Road and the Acheron, Mountain Bike Trails: via Jollies Pass. Tracks accommodate the novice The Rainbow Road, via Jacks Pass. rider with flat rides through the Seasonal road, 4WD only. Heritage Forest and offer more advanced riding north of Jollies Pass Road. For the more adventurous, there are backcountry roads and trails in the St James Conservation Area KAIKOURA and the infamous Jacks Jollies Loop. HANMER SPRINGS MT. LYFORD 1 7A 70 7 LEWIS PASS & SPRINGS Conway Flat JUNCTION WAIAU 7 ROTHERHAM CULVERDEN CHEVIOT 7 HURUNUI DOMETT GORE BAY 1 HAWARDEN WAIKARI GRETA VALLEY WEKA PASS MOTUNAU WAIPARA AMBERLEY LEITHFIELD 1 WAIKUKU 72 PEGASUS Distances and Drive Times* KEY: CHRISTCHURCH - WAIPARA Cafe or Restaurant 60 kilometres (55 mins) KAIAPOI Fuel WAIPARA - HANMER SPRINGS 78 kilometres (1hr, 05 mins) Toilets WAIPARA - KAIKOURA Swimming Spot Christchurch Airport (via SH1) 123 kilometres (1hr, 45 mins) Iconic Photo Stop HANMER SPRINGS - KAIKOURA Local Favourite 73 WEST COAST (via INLAND ROAD) CHRISTCHURCH 130 kilometres (1hr, 55 mins) Scenic Views KAIKOURA - PICTON Wildlife 157 kilometres (2hr, 35 mins) 1 QUEENSTOWN Museum or Gallery * Before you travel by road make sure you Port Hills Biking and Winery Walking Tracks: check the latest conditions (at least 2 hours Christchurch is renowned across the before travel) for SH1 Kaikoura – Picton. Visit country for its stunning mountain bike trails www.journeys.nzta.govt.nz/canterbury and walking tracks - in or call 0800 44 44 49.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlborough 2009
    Marlborough Landscape Study2009 Landscape Characterisation and Evaluation Final Report MARLBOROUGH LANDSCAPE STUDY LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISATION AND EVALUATIon • C07229A Prepared for Marlborough District Council (MDC) by Boffa Miskell Limited Final Report February 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the following people who contributed to this report: Boffa Miskell Limited: James Bentley, Sue McManaway, Sarah Hamilton, William Field, Corey Murray, Alistair Marshall, Allan Rackham Marlborough District Council: Pere Hawes and Tania Bray External Landscape Consultants: Di Lucas, Frank Boffa and Liz Kidson This Final Report incorporates feedback from the First, Second and Third Draft reports, submitted to Marlborough District Council in May, September and November 2009. This Final Report includes all stages of the project [Characterisation and Evaluation] TUDY S and includes comments/recommendations provided during the independent landscape consultants’ workshop in October 2009 and through an internal review undertaken by MDC during late 2009 and early 2010. ANDSCAPE L 2 MARLBOROUGH Front Cover: Early morning mist lingers emphatically around Kenepuru Sound, with the forested Putanui Point evident in the foreground. Small photo to left: Wine growing in the Wairau Valley. Small photo to right: The dry hills of the Redwood Pass. Inside Cover: The vivid-pink colouration of the salt-drying ponds at Lake Grassmere, as seen from the air. TUDY S ANDSCAPE L 3 MARLBOROUGH Marlborough Landscape Study2009 Landscape Characterisation and Evaluation Final Report
    [Show full text]
  • The Motu Kaikoura Trust 2018
    MOTU KAIKOURA SCENIC RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Neil Davies Motu Kaikoura Trust 2017 Neil Davies THE MOTU KAIKOURA TRUST 2018 www.motukaikoura.org.nz 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Motu Kaikoura – the Vision B. Landscape and Geology C. The Natural Heritage C.1 Flora C.1.1 Kanuka woodlands C.1.2 Broadleaf forest C.1.3 Kauri associated forest C.1.4 Pine areas C.1.5 Ferns and herbs C.1.6 Stream margins/wetland plants C.1.8 Policies for native flora management C.2 Fauna C.2.1 Forest Birds C.2.2 Seabirds C.2.3 Policies for the management of native birds C.2.4 Reptiles C.2.5 Policies for the management of native reptiles C.2.6 Native Mammals (terrestrial and marine) C.2.7 Policies for the management of native mammals C.2.8 Freshwater fauna C.2.9 Policies for the management native freshwater fauna. C.3.0 Invertebrates C.3.1 Policies for the management of invertebrates C.4 Pest Management and Biosecurity C.4.1 Pest Plants C.4.2 Policies for the management of pest plants C.4.3 Pest Animals. C.4.4 Rodents – attempted eradication 2008 C.4.5 Manual rat control operation C.4.5.1 Motu Kaikoura rat control network C.4.6 Policies for animal pest management and control C.4.7 Biosecurity C.4.8 Biosecurity policies for pest plants and animals D. Historical and Cultural Heritage D.1 Aotea, Motu Kaikoura – i nga wā o mua D.2 Ngāti Rehua occupation of Motu Kaikoura D.3 Early European history of Motu Kaikoura D.4 Kaikoura Island in the 20th Century D 4.1.Policies for Historical Heritage and archaeological protection E.
    [Show full text]