Economic Losses T 1939 to January on the Nikkei

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Losses T 1939 to January on the Nikkei litary Intelligence the beginning of "sensitive a area" lions of war-time h observation can ry can readily be n and maneuvers; :causeof the tre- ,sexposed to sab- rea covering less cludesabout 407o nufacturing tools. rtion of war-time fthe federal gov- communications. lequipment pass- ; of men and sup- easilydiscernible EconomicLoss on the personsto lbel,for instance, r presidentof the Exclusion from the West Coast imposed very substantial economic losses t 1939 to January on the Nikkei. The complete picture of those lossesis a mosaic I was one of the of thousands of personal histories of individual families. Owners and in its encourage- operators of farms and businesseseither sold their income-producing 'e of Germany in assets under distress-sale circumstances on very short notice or at- t05 tempted, with or without government help, to place their property in standardsestab- the custody of people remaining on the Coast. The effectiveness of ether, under the these measures varied greatly in protecting evacuees'economic inter- st Coast in 1943 ests. Homes had to be sold or left without the personal attention that live and conduct owners would devote to them. Businesseslost their good will, their that they had to reputation, their customers. Professionals had their careers disrupted. asonablerelation Not only did many sufier major losses during evacuation, but their ln was found ex- economic circumstances deteriorated further while they were in camp. The years of exclusion were frequently punctuated by financial trou- rsameconclusion bles: trying to look after property without being on the scene when c its proofagainst difficulties arose; lacking a source of income to meet tax, mortgage and ritedStates. How insurance payments. Goods were lost or stolen. Income and earning slybe considered capacity were reduced to almost nothing during the long detention in g of 1942 on the relocation centers, and after the war life had to be started anew on )s were places of meager resources.War disrupted the economic well-being of thousands of Americans, but the distinct situation of the Nikkei-unable to rely on family or, often, on close friends to tend their afiairs-involved demonstrably greater hardship, anxiety and loss than other Americans LL7 ll8 rERSoNAL JUSTTcEDENTED suffered. Forty years after the events, a detailed reckoning of Nikkei of 1942, wl carried, wh Iosses and suffering is difficult, as the postwar effort to calculate these or whether Iossesand to make partial recompense for them shows. unreasonab would have the medicir relocation t The who CALCULATING AND COMPENSATING FOR LOSS could not t And, tod In 1948 Congress passed the Japanese-AmericanEvacuation Claims taken place Actr which gave persons of Japanese ancestry the right to claim from to secure e' "damage the government to or loss of real or personal property," not homes, the "a a1 compensated by insurance, which occurred as reasonable and natural a decade To add fi consequence of the evacuation or exclusion."2 The Act was amended of the Gov over the years but remained the central vehicle by which the federal value as crr government attempted to compensate for the economic lossesdue to Thus the best e exclusion and evacuation. There were many kinds of injury the Evac- The passageofr uation Claims Act made no attempt to compensate: the stigma placed many Issei and on people who fell under the evacuation and relocation orders: the One study deprivation of liberty suffered during detention in the assembly and done shortly af relocation centers; the psychological impact of evacuation and relo- Return. It focus cation; the loss of earnings or profits; physical injury or death during evacuated adull detention; and losses from resettlement outside the camps. The leg- loss of $2,5007- islative history reflects that such claims were considered too specula- lion in claims p tive.3 the approximat Twenty-six thousand, five hundred sixty-eight claims totaling $148 estimates are c million were filed under the Act; the total amount distributed by the estimate persor government was approximately $37 million.a It is difficult to estimate were not prese the extent of property losses which were not fully compensated under culated. In add the Evacuation Claims Act, for the evidence is suggestiverather than comprehensive or complete. income lossesir to labor and mr First, by the time the claims were adludicated, most of the es- ized this study sential financial records from the time of the evacuation were no longer considering am available. When the Evacuation Claims Act was set in motion in 1g48, ough analytical the Department of Justice discovered that the Internal Revenue Serv- ice had already destroyed most of the 1g3g to lg42 income tax returns evacuation, ef svnsusss-1he most comprehensive set of federal financial records.5 A second Nor was the situation better among the evacuees themselves. The Effects of the I japanese American Citizens League emphasized this problem in tes- fornia," relies , tifuing in favor of amending the Evacuation Claims Act in lgb4: in analyzing thr It was the exception and not the rule when minute and detailed points out that records and documents were retained. In the stress and tension were five years ECONOMICLOSS I19 :ailed reckoning of Nikkei of 1942, when one could only take to camp what could be hand carried, rr effort to calculate these when one did not know how long he would be detained or whether he would ever be allowed hem shows. to return, it would be unreasonable to expect that emotion-charged men and women would have chosen to pack books and records instead ofthe food, the medicines, and the clothing which they took with them to war relocation centers. FOR LOSS The whole community was moved, and so books and records could not be left with neighbors or even with friends. And, today 12 years later, with all the great changes that have rrican Evacuation Claims taken place particularly on the west coast, it is almost impossible y the right to claim from to secure even remotely accurate appraisals and evaluations of the r personalproperty," not homes, the businesses, the farms and the properties of more than "a reasonableand natural a decade ago, a decade ofwar and upheaval. "2 To add further difficulties, The Act was amended under Federal and State codes, most of the Government records of 1942-which might have been of icle by which the federal value as cross-references-have been destroyed pursuant to law.6 e economiclosses due to Thus the best evidence of economic losses no longer existed by 1954. kinds of injury the Evac- The passage of another twenty-eight years, coupled with the deaths :nsate:the stigma placed of many Issei and witnesses, has only added to the difficulty. rd relocation orders; the One study of property and income losses due to evacuation was :ion in the assembly and done shortly after World War II, Broom and Riemer's Remaoal and of evacuation and relo- Return. It focused on Los Angeles and the authors estimated that each rl injury or death during evacuated adult had a median property loss of and an income ide the camps. The leg- $1,000 loss of would have resulted in approximately consideredtoo specula- $2,5007-which $77 mil- lion in claims payments under the Evacuation Claims Act, rather than the approximately $37 million actually paid. The Broom and Riemer :ight claims totaling $I48 estimates are conservative. Replacement nount distributed by the costs of 1941 were used to estimate personal property It is difficult to estimate losses. Estimates of real property losses were not presented fully compensatedunder separately and it is not clear how they were cal- culated. is suggestiverather than In addition, Broom and Riemer did not distinguish between income losses imputable to property and that part of income imputable dicated, most of the es- to labor and management components.s In 1954 the JACL character- ,zacuationwere no longer ized this study as authoritative to the Congressional subcommittee asset in motion in 1948. considering amendments to the Acts and it is certainly the most thor- , Internal Revenue Serv- ough analytical work that is even roughly contemporaneous with the 1942income tax returns evacuation. "The :deral financial records.5 A second suggestive study by Lon Hatamiya, Economic rcueesthemselves. The Effects of the Second World War Upon Japanese Americans in Cali zed this problem in tes- fornia," relies on Broom and Reimer's work but develops other data )laimsAct in 1954: in analyzing the income of the ethnic Japanese in California. Hatamiya ten minute and detailed points out that Broom was already dealing with recollections which n the stressand tension were ffve years old and that the study was limited to Los Angeles, but I2O PERSoNAL IUsTICE DENIED his analysis supports Broom on income ftgures and thus suggests the Decisions" to guide all future s general soundness of Broom's property loss ftgures. Hatamiya estimates for Japanese phonograph recc the 1940 median annual (alien g622.10 income ofJapanese and citizen) at it was rumored that anyone w Broom had estimated rr the mean as $67I-694. Hatamiya argues that was not allowed since the loss since median figures are "the often less than mean figures, there is no major was caused by general hy discrepancy between these numbers. Hatamiya does not attempt to of the state of war"'2r but a $ estimate property losses directly. car for sale at the time of el For years, writers and commentators have cited an estimate by allowed.22Thus the difficulty o the Federal Reserve Bank ofSan Francisco that evacuee property losses ants' losses, the evidentiary ran to $400 million.r2 The Commission has inquired of the Federal partment and a compromiseat Reserve, which can find no basis in its records for such an estimate, of many claims, would tend , and the Commission can identifo no known source for the number.
Recommended publications
  • California Cadet Corps Curriculum on Citizenship
    California Cadet Corps Curriculum on Citizenship “What We Stand For” C8B: Great Americans Updated 20 NOV 2020 Great Americans • B1. Native American Warriors • B2. Military Nurses • B3. Suffragettes • B4. Buffalo Soldiers • B5. 65th IN Regiment “Borinqueneers” • B6. Lafayette Flying Corps • B7. Doolittle Raiders • B8. Navajo Code Talkers • B9. Tuskegee Airmen • B10. African American Units in World War • B11. World War II Nisei Units NATIVE AMERICAN WARRIORS OBJECTIVES DESIRED OUTCOME (Followership) At the conclusion of this training, Cadets will be able to describe groups who have sacrificed for the benefit of the United States despite challenges and obstacles. Plan of Action: 1. Define the warrior tradition and how that motivates Native Americans to serve their country today. 2. Describe how Native American communities support their soldiers and veterans through culture and ceremonies. Essential Question: How have Native Americans contributed to the United States military, and how does their community support and influence their contribution? The Warrior Tradition What is the warrior tradition? Sitting Bull, of the Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux, said: “The warrior, for us, is one who sacrifices himself for the good of others. His task is to take care of the elderly, the defenseless, those who cannot provide for themselves, and above all, the children – the future of humanity.” Being a warrior is more than about fighting it is about service to the community and protection of your homeland. (WNED-TV & Florentine Films/Hott Productions, 2019) The Warrior Tradition Use this link to play The Warrior Tradition https://www.pbs.org/wned/warrior-tradition/watch/ Check on Learning 1. Name a symbol of Native American tradition that you still see used in Native American culture today.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackface Behind Barbed Wire
    Blackface Behind Barbed Wire Gender and Racial Triangulation in the Japanese American Internment Camps Emily Roxworthy THE CONFUSER: Come on, you can impersonate a Negro better than Al Jolson, just like you can impersonate a Jap better than Marlon Brando. [...] Half-Japanese and half-colored! Rare, extraordinary object! Like a Gauguin! — Velina Hasu Houston, Waiting for Tadashi ([2000] 2011:9) “Fifteen nights a year Cinderella steps into a pumpkin coach and becomes queen of Holiday Inn,” says Marjorie Reynolds as she applies burnt cork to her face [in the 1942 filmHoliday Inn]. The cinders transform her into royalty. — Michael Rogin, Blackface, White Noise (1996:183) During World War II, young Japanese American women performed in blackface behind barbed wire. The oppressive and insular conditions of incarceration and a political climate that was attacking the performers’ own racial status rendered these blackface performances somehow exceptional and even resistant. 2012 marked the 70th anniversary of the US government’s deci- sion to evacuate and intern nearly 120,000 Japanese Americans from the West Coast. The mass incarceration of Issei and Nisei in 1942 was justified by a US mindset that conflated every eth- nic Japanese face, regardless of citizenship status or national allegiance, with the “face of the TDR: The Drama Review 57:2 (T218) Summer 2013. ©2013 New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 123 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/DRAM_a_00264 by guest on 01 October 2021 enemy.”1 While this racist reading of the Japanese (American) face has been widely condemned in the intervening 70 years, the precarious semiotics of Japanese ethnicity are remarkably pres- ent for contemporary observers attempting to apprehend the relationship between a Japanese (American) face and blackface.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Pearl Harbor 29
    Part I Niseiand lssei Before PearlHarbor On Decemb er'7, 194L, Japan attacked and crippled the American fleet at Pearl Harbor. Ten weeks later, on February 19, 1942, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 under which the War De- partment excluded from the West Coast everyone of Japanese ances- try-both American citizens and their alien parents who, despite long residence in the United States, were barred by federal law from be- coming American citizens. Driven from their homes and farms and "relocation businesses, very few had any choice but to go to centers"- Spartan, barrack-like camps in the inhospitable deserts and mountains of the interior. * *There is a continuing controversy over the contention that the camps "concentration were camps" and that any other term is a euphemism. The "concentration government documents of the time frequently use the term camps," but after World War II, with full realization of the atrocities committed by the Nazis in the death camps of Europe, that phrase came to have a very different meaning. The American relocation centers were bleak and bare, and life in them had many hardships, but they were not extermination camps, nor did the American government embrace a policy of torture or liquidation of the "concentration To use the phrase camps summons up images ethnic Japanese. "relo- ,and ideas which are inaccurate and unfair. The Commission has used "relocation cation centers" and camps," the usual term used during the war, not to gloss over the hardships of the camps, but in an effort to {ind an historically fair and accurate phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii Internment Camp Survivors
    WORLD WAR II INTERNMENT CAMP SURVIVORS: THE STORIES AND LIFE EXPERIENCES OF JAPANESE AMERICAN WOMEN Precious Vida Yamaguchi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Radhika Gajjala, Ph.D., Advisor Sherlon Pack-Brown, Ph.D. Graduate Faculty Representative Lynda D. Dixon, Ph.D. Lousia Ha, Ph.D. Ellen Gorsevski, Ph.D. © 2010 Precious Vida Yamaguchi All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Radhika Gajjala, Advisor On February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066 required all people of Japanese ancestry in America (one-eighth of Japanese blood or more), living on the west coast to be relocated into internment camps. Over 120,000 people were forced to leave their homes, businesses, and all their belongings except for one suitcase and were placed in barbed-wire internment camps patrolled by armed police. This study looks at narratives, stories, and experiences of Japanese American women who experienced the World War II internment camps through an anti-colonial theoretical framework and ethnographic methods. The use of ethnographic methods and interviews with the generation of Japanese American women who experienced part of their lives in the United State World War II internment camps explores how it affected their lives during and after World War II. The researcher of this study hopes to learn how Japanese American women reflect upon and describe their lives before, during, and after the internment camps, document the narratives of the Japanese American women who were imprisoned in the internment camps, and research how their experiences have been told to their children and grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal City Family Internment Camp Brochure
    CRYSTAL CITY FAMILY INTERNMENT CAMP Enemy Alien Internment in Texas CRYSTAL CITY FAMILY during World War II INTERNMENT CAMP Enemy Alien Internment in Texas Acknowledgements during World War II The Texas Historical Commission (THC) would like to thank the City of Crystal City, the Crystal City Independent School District, former Japanese, German, and Italian American and Latin American internees and their families and friends, as well as a host of historians who have helped with the preparation of this project. For more information on how to support the THC’s military history program, visit thcfriends.org/donate. This project is assisted by a grant from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the THC and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 08/20 “Inevitably, war creates situations which Americans would not countenance in times of peace, such as the internment of men and women who were considered potentially dangerous to America’s national security.” —INS, Department of Justice, 1946 Report Shocked by the December 7, 1941, Empire came from United States Code, Title 50, Section 21, of Japan attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii that Restraint, Regulation, and Removal, which allowed propelled the United States into World War II, one for the arrest and detention of Enemy Aliens during government response to the war was the incarceration war. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Proclamation of thousands No. 2525 on December 7, 1941 and Proclamations No.
    [Show full text]
  • Background to Japanese American Relocation
    CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND TO JAPANESE AMERICAN RELOCATION Japanese Americans Prior to World War II The background to Japanese American relocation extends to the mid-19th century when individuals of Chinese descent first arrived in the Western U.S. to work as mine and railroad laborers (Appendix B). Discrimination against the Chinese arose soon after because of economic (i.e., unfair labor competition) and racial (i.e., claims of racial impurity and injury to western civilization) concerns. Because a significant portion of California’s population was Chinese (i.e., approximately 10% in 1870), California played a key role in this discrimination. In 1882, U.S. President Arthur signed into law the Chinese Exclusion Act that effectively ended Chinese immigration to the U.S. until 1943 when the U.S. was allied with China in World War II (Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, 1997). Individuals of Japanese descent began to emigrate in significant numbers to North America’s West Coast in the late 19th century (Appendix B). They came primarily because of the “push” of harsh economic conditions in Japan and the “pull” of employment opportunities in the U.S., partially created by the loss of the Chinese labor force (Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, 1997). Most of these first generation Japanese or Issei settled in California, Oregon, and Washington where they worked in the agriculture, timber, and fishing industries. In California alone, the number of Japanese immigrants increased from 1,147 in 1890 to 10,151 in 1900 (U.S. Census Office, 1895; 1901). The total Japanese American population in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusion Or Inclusion? the Japanese Struggle to Own Land in California
    EXCLUSION OR INCLUSION? THE JAPANESE STRUGGLE TO OWN LAND IN CALIFORNIA AUTHOR: Robbie See / William Mendenhall Middle School, Livermore, California GUIDING QUESTION: As Japanese immigrants struggled to own farmland in California, who was most influential in building an inclusive society: the state, the nation, or the people themselves? OVERVIEW CONNECTIONS TO C3 FRAMEWORK Using the legal decisions from Oyama et al., v. California and › D2.Civ.4.9-12. Explain how the U.S. Constitution Sei Fujii v. State, students will examine the relative influence establishes a system of government that has powers, of the U.S. Constitution, state law, and citizens’ actions as responsibilities, and limits that have changed over time Japanese immigrants struggled to secure equal status as and that are still contested. landowners in California. › D2.Civ.12.9-12. Analyze how people use and challenge local, state, national, and international laws to address a variety of public issues. OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this activity, students will be able to DOCUMENTS USED › Describe the impact of national immigration restrictions and California’s Alien Land Law (1913); PRIMARY SOURCES › Evaluate the importance of the Fourteenth Amendment An Act to Amend the Naturalization Laws and to punish as a guarantor of equal rights; and Crimes against the same, and for other Purposes, 1870 (excerpt) › Assess the role state governments, the federal Library of Congress government, and people play in ensuring rights. https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-con- gress/session-2/c41s2ch254.pdf Alien Land Laws in California (1913 & 1920) STANDARDS CONNECTIONS Immigration and Ethnic History Society, University of Texas at Austin, History Department CONNECTIONS TO COMMON CORE https://immigrationhistory.org/item/alien-land-laws-in-cali- › CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.9-10.1 Determine the central ideas fornia-1913-1920/ or information of a primary or secondary source; provide Amendment XIV, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The CSU Japanese American Digitization Project Is the First Statewide Collaborative Initiative Among CSU Archives
    The CSU Japanese American Ichiro Hayashi intake photo, Tule Digitization Lake. 1943. SJSU. Project What is CSUJAD? A web portal to connect researchers with the CSU’s rich archival collections. Palos Verdes Language School. CSUDH. During the last half-century the archives, libraries, oral history projects and history departments at several California State Universities (CSU) have collected archival materials, objects and media relating to the era when 120,000 law-abiding Americans of Japanese descent were forcibly uprooted from their homes and imprisoned in incarceration camps during World War II. The CSU Japanese American Digitization Project is the first statewide collaborative initiative among CSU archives. Participants The Archives at 15 different California State Universities are participants in the project. These include: Dominguez Hills, Fresno, Fullerton, Northridge, Sacramento, San Jose, Sonoma, San Francisco, San Diego, San Luis Dentists at the Gila River Obispo, Long Beach, San Bernardino, Channel Islands, Camp, ca. 1940s. CSUDH. East Bay, and Bakersfield. Other partners include the Claremont Colleges, UC Santa Barbara, California Digital Library and Densho. Funding CSU Dominguez Hills, home of the CSU System Archives, Dr. Donald Hata, Dr Rita Takahashi, Aiko Herzig-Yoshinaga, and Dr. Roger Daniels, at the CSUJAD Symposium, June 2014. received a National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Planning grant in 2014 to start the project. This led to a 2015 National Parks Service (NPS) grant to digitize 10,000 archival items. In 2016, the project received an NEH Implementation Grant to digitize another 5,000 objects. This project was funded, in part, by a grant by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining Religious Nones: Lessons from Chinese and Japanese American Young Adults
    Religions 2015, 6, 891–911; doi:10.3390/rel6030891 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Redefining Religious Nones: Lessons from Chinese and Japanese American Young Adults Russell Jeung1,*, Brett Esaki 2 and Alice Liu 3 1 Asian American Studies Department, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue EP103, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA 2 Department of Religious Studies, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3994, Atlanta, GA 30302-3994, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Educational Studies, Ohio State University, 127 Arps Hall, 1945 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-415-338-7586; Fax: +1-415-338-0500. Academic Editor: Peter I. Kaufman Received: 13 June 2015 / Accepted: 27 July 2015 / Published: 30 July 2015 Abstract: This analysis of Chinese and Japanese American young adults, based on the Pew Research Center 2012 Asian American Survey, examines the religious nones of these ethnic groups. Rather than focusing on their beliefs and belonging to religious denominations, it highlights their spiritual practices and ethical relations using an Asian-centric liyi (ritual and righteousness) discourse. Despite being religious nones, these groups have high rates of ancestor veneration and participation in ethnic religious festivals, as well as strong familial and reciprocal obligations. These findings indicate that, similar to other American Millennials, these groups may be better understood by how they do religion than in what they believe. Keywords: religious nones; spiritual but not religious; Chinese Americans; Japanese Americans; Asian Americans; millennials Religions 2015, 6 892 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Then They Came for Me Incarceration of Japanese Americans During WWII and the Demise of Civil Liberties ALPHAWOOD GALLERY, CHICAGO JUNE 29 to NOVEMBER 19, 2017
    Then They Came for Me Incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII and the Demise of Civil Liberties ALPHAWOOD GALLERY, CHICAGO JUNE 29 TO NOVEMBER 19, 2017 ALPHAWOOD FOUNDATION STATEMENT Alphawood Foundation is the proud sponsor of the exhibition Then They Came for Me: Incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII and the Demise of Civil Liberties. Why did we feel it was important to share this story with the Chicago community? Alphawood exists to help create a more equitable, just and humane society for all of us. A difficult but essential part of that mission is to shine a light on great injustice, great inhumanity and great failure to live up to the core principles underlying our society. Then They Came for Me presents the shameful story of the United States government’s imprisonment of 120,000 people, most of them American citizens, solely based on their ethnic background. Think about that. Then think about what is occurring in our country right now, and what might be just around the corner. George Santayana wrote “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” The Japanese American incarceration represents a moment when we collectively turned our backs on the great promise and responsibility of our Constitution. We denied equal protection under the law to our fellow Americans and legal residents because of their ancestry alone. We tell this story because we love our country. We care deeply about its past, present and future. We know that America is better than the racism and xenophobia that triggered the events depicted in this exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9211240 “Successful minorities”: A critical reexamination of the Cuban-American case Vidal de Haymes, Maria del Rosario, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1991 Copyright ©1991 by Vidal de Haymes, Maria del Rosario.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebration of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Heritage Month
    Celebration of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Heritage Month Annotated Book Bibliography Theme: History, Trends and Anti-Violence against AAPI Prepared by Drs. Xue-Ming Bao and Alan Delozier Seton Hall University Libraries May 2021 Adams, Maurianne. 2000. Readings for Diversity and Social Justice. New York; Routledge. This work covers the scope of oppressions in America. It contains a mix of short personal and theoretical essays and should be designed as an introduction to the topics at hand. Altschiller, Donald. 1999. Hate Crimes: A Reference Handbook. 1 online resource (xi, 204 pages). vols. Contemporary World Issues. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. This book offers a historical look at the targets of hate crimes in America, offers a chronology of some crimes committed against them, and includes a look at individuals who are combating violent extremist activities. Arar Han and John Hsu. 2004. Asian American X: An Intersection of Twenty-First Century Asian American Voices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. The essays highlight the vast cultural diversity within the category of Asian American, yet ultimately reveal how these young people are truly American in their ideals and dreams. Asian American X is more than a book on identity; it is required reading both for young Asian Americans who seek to understand themselves and their social group, and for all who are interested in keeping abreast of the changing American social terrain. Clara C. Park. 2007. Asian American Education: Acculturation, Literacy Development, and Learning. Research on the Education of Asian and Pacific Americans. Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing. This series explores and explains the lived experiences of Asian and Americans as they acculturate to American schools, develop literacy, and claim their place in U.S.
    [Show full text]