Port Facility & Directory
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Latest Annual Report
Annual Report 2017 3461 Carmen Ave. Rancho Viejo, TX 78575 (956) 621-5571 ON THE COVER Freight truck passing through State Highway 550 (I-169), Port Spur Table of Contents Message from Chairman ..................................................................1 Message from Executive Director ......................................................2 Why the RGV ...................................................................................3 Overview ...........................................................................................5 Projects State Highway 550/Interstate 169 .....................................................7 Toll Processing Services ....................................................................9 South Padre Island Second Access ................................................. 11 State Highway 32 .............................................................................13 Highlights Financials .........................................................................................15 Community Outreach .................................................................... 17 Message From The Chairman Since our creation in 2004, objectives that focus on strategic the Cameron County Regional corridor development, which help Mobility Authority (CCRMA) achieve quality transportation has made signifcant progress to within our county and region. fnd new and innovative tools to The CCRMA will continue reduce the problems of congestion to be recognized as a leader in and connectivity while facilitating Texas -
Texas U.S. Ports of Entry
Texas U.S. Ports of Entry www.BusinessInTexas.com TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY Overview U.S. Ports of Entry Ports of Entry are officially designated areas at U.S. For current or further information on U.S. and Texas land borders, seaports, and airports which are ports, check the CBP website at approved by U.S. Customs and Border Protection www.cbp.gov/border-security/ports-entry or contact (CBP). There are 328 official ports of entry in the the CBP at: U.S. and 13 preclearance offices in Canada and the Caribbean. 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20229 Port personnel are the face at the border for most Inquiries (877) 227-5511 cargo and visitors entering the United States. At International Callers (202)325-8000 Ports, CBP officers or Port employees accept entries of merchandise, clear passengers, collect duties, Texas Ports of Entry enforce the import and export laws and regulations of the U.S. federal government, and conduct Texas currently has 29 official U.S. ports of entry, immigration policy and programs. Ports also perform more than any other state, according to the CBP agriculture inspections to protect the nation from website. The map below provides details. potential carriers of animal and plant pests or diseases that could cause serious damage to the Information on the Texas ports of entry follows, in nation's crops, livestock, pets, and the environment. alphabetical order, in the next section. U.S. Ports of Entry In Texas 1 TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY Texas Ports of Entry P ort of Entry: Addison Airport Port Information Port Code: 5584 Port Type: User Fee Airport Location Address: 4300 Westgrove Addison, TX 75001 General Phone: (469) 737-6913 General Fax: (469) 737-5246 Operational Hours: 8:30 AM-5:00 PM (Central) Weekdays (Monday-Friday) Brokers: View List Directions to Port Office DFW Airport: Take hwy 114 to Addison Airport Press Office Field Office Name: Houston Location Houston, TX Address: 2323 S. -
2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION
2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary .......................................................................................................................... -
2014 Departmental Map
TRAVEL INFORMATION Dial 1-800-452-9292 for travel assistance from a professional Texas travel counselor, including routing in Texas, emergency road condition information, and other travel services; or to register a comment or Departmental Map 2014complaint about department operations.° 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W To Boise City OKLAHOMA To Boise City To Guymon To Guymon To Liberal To Beaver 2586QR NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS Texhoma 296 287 2248 1454 To Clayton OP m 1262 /(83 Booker QR QR l QR 15 2741 1290QR 1261 43 QR To Shattuck 815 O981P 896 2677 QR 1267 Darrouzett 15 1655 2450 35 B377 1192 OP OP Texline QR /(54 2349 QR 23 Follett 43 QR QR Ray QR 3356 3133 296 QR 143 43 Pilot 289 QR QR 78 Leonard OP 119 BA PERRYTON 1455 sr mlE 65 5 43 OP 3214 377 QR 455 /(77 Roberts Point 21 /( DALLAM 20765 QR OP 2172 2741 OP 1190 455 2862 69 807 143 QR QR QR Lake OP B289 QR OP 1290 2535 BA /(87 1879 STRATFORD QR QR 455 65C E 78 QR 192 455 2164 OP Weston a Anna 43 15 BA 305 OP Sanger QR s 455 43 136 65 1204QR 51 455 t OP 385 1262 65 1261 ef 377 OP F 981 QR QR 2450 o 455 OP ml 2232 3004 QR B35 ml r OP 296 QR 3045 QR 2153 Celina k OP 2387 15 QR 2711 sr QR /(75 121 278 r 2862 /(54 2014 15 OP QR 43 QR WISE X 2478 T 65 QR LIPSCOMB e QR r QR 43 Gruver i 981 376 iv 3524 n Blue Ridge 1562 NORTH CENTRAL QR i OP QR 1573 760 OP R t 3110 3213 287 QR OP 1385 y QR QR m @84 70 LIPSCOMB 188 2164 QR 545 B78 l SHERMAN ? 43 BA 730 QR 428 R Melissa OP 65 2018 ( OP y Aubrey 428 / i 2899 SPEARMAN 81 3163 t OP 543 v D QR 1454 -
Hazardous Material Profile
prepared for North Carolina Statewide North Carolina Department of Transportation Multimodal Freight Plan prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Pipeline and Hazardous Material with Profile IEM February 1, 2017 report North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Pipeline and Hazardous Material Profile prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 730 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500 Atlanta, GA 30318 with IEM date February 1, 2017 North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Overview, Data and Methodology .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Organization of the Report ......................................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 Fuels .................................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.1 Fuel Model ................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2 Fuel Volumes by Mode in 2015 and Projections to 2045 .......................................................... 2-8 2.3 Pipelines ................................................................................................................................. -
Bonds Are a Backup Plan for Texas Port's Ship Channel
Bonds are a Backup Plan for Texas Port's Ship Channel By Richard Williamson Published August 31 2018, 11:28am EDT DALLAS – The Port of Brownsville, Texas, may use revenue bonds to finance dredging operations to accommodate larger vessels but is keeping the option in reserve for now, officials said. “Revenue bonds are on the table only as a means of last resort,” said Steve Tyndal, senior director of marketing and business development at the port. The Port of Brownsville wants to deepen its ship channel to 52 feet from the current 42 feet to accommodate larger vessels. Like other ports around the nation, Brownsville -- managed by the Brownsville Navigation District -- wants to deepen its 17-mile ship channel to 52 feet from its current 42 feet to handle the larger ships coming through the expanded Panama Canal and deeper-draft tankers carrying U.S. energy exports. But like the other ports, Brownsville must wait for federal funding and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before the $200 million project can begin. “The cost is challenging, especially for an emerging port like Brownsville,” said BND board secretary Sergio Tito Lopez. The larger Port of Corpus Christi, 150 miles up the Gulf Coast, is issuing its own bonds to finance the dredging in anticipation of eventual federal funding. In March, the commission that governs the nation’s fourth-largest port by tonnage voted to issue up to $400 million of bonds to dredge the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. The port has been seeking the promised federal funds for 28 years. -
Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook
TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies -
Texas Ports and Courts Update
Texas Ports and Courts Update March 2021 1. COVID-19 Ports Update We have collected and summarized these items to In response to decreasing COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations, the help keep you apprised of the latest news and Governor of Texas recently rescinded statewide public occupancy developments from the ports and courts on the restrictions and mask mandates. Businesses are free to enforce their Texas coast. own restrictions, and many have kept their previous requirements in place. Texas port/terminal facilities nearly uniformly continue to require the same preventative measures (e.g., masks, temperature checks, physical distancing, etc.) despite the Governor’s recent announcement. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Coast Guard, and many vessel agents continue to board vessels and conduct activities in person. Vessels still need to advise CBP and Coast Guard boarding teams of any In this Update: crew illnesses prior to embarkation. Vessels are also required to notify the Coast Guard Captain of the Port of any crewmember showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19. 1. COVID-19 Ports Update Rapid COVID-19 testing is generally available, and test administrations can be scheduled and completed in relatively short timeframes. 2. Recent Port Activity & Shore leave remains allowed. Crew changes/repatriation requests are Development Projects permitted on a case-by-case basis. Off-signing crewmembers are generally required to proceed directly to 3. News from the Courts the airport for their flights, and overnight hotel stays are typically not permitted. CBP is generally requiring the following items in relation to a crewmember’s repatriation requests: (1) passport bio page; (2) C1/D visa; (3) I-95 landing permit; and (4) e-tickets with direct flights departing the U.S. -
MAY 8, 2014 Mr. Charles L. Dunlap Chief Executive Officer
MAY 8, 2014 Mr. Charles L. Dunlap Chief Executive Officer TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP 1670 Broadway, Room 3100 Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: CPF No. 3-2013-5025 Dear Mr. Dunlap: Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It makes a finding of violation and specifies actions that need to be taken by TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP, to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. When the terms of the compliance order have been completed, as determined by the Director, Central Region, this enforcement action will be closed. Service of the Final Order by certified mail is deemed effective upon the date of mailing, or as otherwise provided under 49 C.F.R. § 190.5. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Jeffrey D. Wiese Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety Enclosure cc: Ms. Linda Daugherty, Director, Central Region, OPS CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 __________________________________________ ) In the Matter of ) ) TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP, ) CPF No. 3-2013-5025 ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________) FINAL ORDER On October 1-5, 2012, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of the facilities and records of TransMontaigne Operating Company, LP (TransMontaigne or Respondent), in Missouri and Arkansas. The inspection covered the company’s Razorback Pipeline facilities in Missouri and Arkansas (Razorback Pipeline) and an examination of TransMontaigne records at the company’s offices in Rogers, Arkansas. -
HOFMOKEL, Frederick W Aug,1942
FORM N Nl•l$9 ORIGINATOR SUBJE:CT C.14026 DIO 8ND 1. H0J:i'M0KE~, Frederick Wilhelm vk 2. DATE OF I.ETTER ORIGINATOR'S FII..E NUMEIER 0. N, I, Fll..E NUMEIERS iil aCL 2/14/42 A8•5(l6-dlp) 3 @ 1. O. N. I. ROUTING SLIP - - - FINISHED FILE COPY• - - DO NOT DETACH '' ;a IN REPLY ADDRESS NOT TIIR ~ SlONER OF TIIIS LETTER, nuT ) OOMMANDANT, EIOH'l'll NA'VAL a0. C DIS'l'RXOT, NEW' l!~EDERAL BUILD"' 1il ING 1 NEW . ORLEANS, LA, 0. REFFJR TO No, HEADQUARTERS EIGHTH NAVAL A8-5 NEW FEDERAL BUILDING (16-dlp) 0 (D 0 [ :31 (D 0. :r: MEMOHANDUM 0 a: s· (Q (/J ~ 5' (D z District Intelligence Of fie er, 8ND. ~ 0 ::, Director of Naval Intelligence. ~ )> cl Subject: HOFMOKfEL, Frederick Wilhelm. I Reference: (a) Various 8ND Cards, same subject. Enclosure: (A) Copy of original report on sub~ject made by MID Officer, F'ort Brown, Texas. 1<) Enclosure (A), 1.n the preparation of which the Officer in Charge, Brownsville Branch, airnistE"Jd., is forwarded for inforri1ation, and contains all avallable material on subject .:ln the Brownsville Office and the MID Office at Fort Brown. 2. 'I'he P.D.I. advises that they have subject under sur- veillance. ;;a (D "Oa CONFJP,~\)lJIJ\t 0.. C ~ ONI MAIL FWOM 0.. =1' 0 3 l:K FEB 16 AM 11 : ?2 S' (D C Subject: Suspected Activities of F'reder:Lck W. Ho.fmokel. ::, O·-- i=1i (D 0.. -0 ~ [ l. Pursuant to the verbal request of Major John W. -
Lone Star State Ports Setting Records, Enhancing Diverse Cargo Infrastructure
Lone Star State ports setting records, enhancing diverse cargo infrastructure by Paul Scott Abbott 5 hours ago | Published in Issue 704 Page 1: Port Houston Page 2: Port of Port Arthur Page 3: Port of Beaumont Page 4: Port of Galveston Page 5: Port Freeport Page 6: Calhoun Port Authority Page 7: Port of Corpus Christi Page 8: Port of Brownsville With record cargo volumes seemingly becoming commonplace, ports throughout Texas are assertively forging ahead with a multitude of infrastructure enhancements to handle even more activity in the future. Recent developments include not only expansions of on-terminal capabilities but also, in a number of cases, the advancement of deeper, wider ship channels. Beginning with Port Houston, the longtime No. 1 U.S. foreign tonnage port, then heading east to the Sabine-Neches Waterway facilities of Port Arthur and Beaumont before taking a southwestward jaunt along the Texas Gulf Coast to just north of the Mexico border, here’s the latest going on at key ports of the Lone Star State: Port Houston Marking a fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth in containerized cargo volume, Port Houston handled a record 2,987,291 twenty-foot-equivalent units in 2019 while adding three new container services and two general cargo liner services. Loaded container exports, buoyed by shipments of polyethylene resins, led the way with a 17 percent year-over-year increase. Overall tonnage moving through Port Houston public facilities also reached an all-time high last year, rising 5 percent over the preceding 12-month period, to 37.8 million tons. -
The Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources
The Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources Interim Report to the 77th Legislature The Economic Impact of Port Regionalization and Expansion November 2000 Senate Interim Committee on Natural Resources Report to the 77th Legislature The Economic Impact of Port Regionalization and Expansion TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................. 5 INTERIM CHARGE .............................................. 5 BACKGROUND ................................................. 7 History of Texas Ports and Their Role in Commerce .................. 7 Brief Overview of Ports in the Lone Star State ...................... 9 History of Ocean Shipping in Texas ............................. 12 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .............................. 16 Role of the Federal Government ............................... 19 Comparison of Other Ports Nationwide .......................... 22 Senate Bill 1665: Port of Houston’s Acquisition of the Port of Galveston .. 23 ECONOMIC IMPACT ............................................ 24 Economic Impact of Texas Ports ............................... 25 Economic Impact of Ports Along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ... 26 Economic Impact of U.S. Ports ................................ 26 Economic Importance of Waterways ............................ 27 GROWTH AND REGIONALIZATION TRENDS .......................... 27 Megaships and Megaports: An Emerging Trend in Shipping ........... 28 Transitioning to Megaships .............................