DOCSLIB.ORG

Petrodollar Or Petroeuro? a New Source of Global Conflict Cóilín Nunan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petrodollar Or Petroeuro? a New Source of Global Conflict Cóilín Nunan FEASTA_Review_MAIN 10/18/04 11:55 AM Page 125 Petrodollar or Petroeuro? A new source of global conflict Cóilín Nunan The current political and economic rift between the US and the European Union has been called a clash of civilizations. Its major cause is a struggle over the gains to be had from producing the world’s leading currency Cóilín Nunan studied mathematics at the universities of Brussels, Cambridge and Oxford. He now lives in Scotland and works for the Soil Association, the UK organic farming charity. His work focuses on the use and abuse of antibiotics in intensive farming and he has co-authored several reports examining the many ways in which this can impact upon human health. He is a Trustee of Feasta and editor of its website. o observer of the lead-up to the war in Iraq international trade and to build up their currency and its aftermath could have failed to reserves. The US provides the world with these Nnotice that the level of cooperation dollars by buying goods and services produced by between Europe and America was extremely low. foreign countries, but since it does not have a France and Germany were very strong opponents corresponding need for foreign currency, it sells far of the US/UK invasion and even after the war was fewer goods and services in return, i.e. the US declared over, disagreements persisted over the always spends more than it earns, whereas the rest lifting of sanctions and how Iraq should be run. So of the world always earns more than it spends. was this just a one-off tiff or was it a symptom of This US trade deficit has now reached deeper flaws in the relationship? I believe that the extraordinary levels, with the US importing 50% war on Iraq illustrated for the first time that more goods and services than it exports. So long continental Europe, led by France and Germany, as the dollar remains the dominant international no longer wishes to follow the Americans currency the US can continue consuming more politically, although what has been termed a ‘clash than it produces and, for example, build up its of civilisations’1 is probably better viewed as a military strength while simultaneously affording ‘clash of economies’. tax cuts. While disagreements over the US trade barriers on Getting a share of this economic free lunch has steel imports or the European restrictions on been one of the motivations, and perhaps the imports of American genetically modified crops main motivation, behind setting up the euro2. have attracted widespread comment, the most Were the euro to become a reserve currency equal intense economic rivalry of all has received far less to, or perhaps even instead of, the dollar, countries media attention than it perhaps should: this is the would reduce their dollar holdings while building rivalry between the dollar and the euro for the up their euro savings. Another way of putting this position of world reserve currency, a privileged would be to say that Eurozone countries would be status that has been held by the dollar ever since able to reduce their subsidy to American the Bretton Woods agreement nearly 60 years ago. consumption and would find that other countries were now subsidising Eurozone consumption At present, approximately two thirds of world trade instead. is conducted in dollars and two thirds of central banks’ currency reserves are held in the American A move away from the dollar towards the euro currency which remains the sole currency used by could, on the other hand, have a disastrous effect international institutions such as the IMF. This on the US economy as the US would no longer be confers on the US a major economic advantage: able to spend beyond its means. Worse still, the the ability to run a trade deficit year after year. It US would have to become a net currency importer can do this because foreign countries need dollars as foreigners would probably seek to spend back to repay their debts to the IMF, to conduct in the US a large proportion of the estimated three FEASTA REVIEW Number 2 125 FEASTA_Review_MAIN 10/18/04 11:55 AM Page 126 Petrodollar or Petroeuro? A New Source of Global Conflict Cóilín Nunan trillion dollars which they currently own. In other fluctuations in the value of the dollar. The knock- words, the US would have to run a trade surplus, on effect of this is that, since many of these providing the rest of the world with more goods exports are essential raw materials which richer and services than it was receiving in return. A rapid countries need to import, their denomination in and wholesale move to the euro might even lead dollars reinforces the need for rich countries to to a dollar crash as everyone sought to get rid of keep their own currency reserves in dollars. some, or all, of their dollars at the same time. But While the denomination of oil sales is not a that is an outcome that no-one, not even France or subject which is frequently discussed in the media, Germany, is seeking because of the huge effect it its importance is certainly well understood by would have on the world economy. Europe would governments. For example, when in 1971 much prefer to see a gradual move to a euro-dollar President Nixon took the US off the gold standard, world, or even a euro-dominated one. OPEC did consider moving away from dollar oil pricing, as dollars no longer had the guaranteed >>> A move away from the dollar value they once did. The US response was to do various secret deals with Saudi Arabia in the 1970s towards the euro could have a to ensure that the world’s most important oil disastrous effect on the US exporter stuck with the dollar3. What the Saudis did, OPEC followed. More recently, in June 2003, economy the Prime Minister of Malaysia publicly encouraged his country’s oil and gas exporters to move from the dollar to the euro. The European It turns out that there is a small group of countries and American reactions were polar opposites: the which is playing the arbiter in this global contest. EU’s Energy Commissioner, Loyola de Palacio, These are the world’s oil exporters, in particular welcomed the suggestion, saying that ‘in the future OPEC and Russia. Ever since the days when the the euro is [going to be] taking a place in the US dominated world oil production, sales of oil international markets in general as the money of and natural gas on international markets have exchange’ and that this was ‘a matter of realism’4. been exclusively denominated in dollars. This was Her counterpart in the US, the director of the partly a natural state of affairs since, up until the Energy Information Administration, Guy Caruso, early 1950s, the US accounted for half or more of said that he couldn’t see ‘any particular merit’ in the world’s annual oil production. The tendency to the move and that over the long run ‘the dollar’s price in dollars was additionally reinforced by the always won out’5. Either way, Malaysia is only a Bretton Woods agreement which established the relatively minor oil exporter, so what it does can IMF and World Bank and adopted the dollar as only have a very limited effect. A switch by a major the currency for international loans. oil exporter would be of far greater significance. The vast majority of the world’s countries are oil The first country to actually make the switch was a importers and, since oil is such a crucial very important oil exporter indeed: Iraq, in commodity, the need to pay for it in dollars November 20006,7. Before the war in Iraq began, encourages these countries keep the majority of some observers, myself included, argued that this their foreign currency reserves in dollars not only might well be a major reason for the US desire to to be able to buy oil directly but also to protect the invade and the strong Franco-German opposition value of their own currencies from falling against to the invasion8,9. Corroborating evidence included the dollar. Because a sudden devaluation of a the apparent influence which loyalty (or lack country’s currency against the dollar would lead to thereof) to the dollar seemed to have on the US a jump in oil prices and a possible economic crisis, attitude towards other OPEC members. Iran had every country’s central bank needs dollar reserves been talking of selling its own oil for euros6,10 and so as to be able to buy its own currency on the was subsequently included in George Bush’s ‘axis foreign exchange markets when its value needs to of evil’. Venezuela, another important oil exporter, be supported. had started bartering some of its oil, thus avoiding The fact that oil sales and loans from the IMF are the use of the dollar, and was encouraging OPEC dollar-denominated also encourages poorer to do likewise11 - and the US was widely suspected countries to denominate their exports in dollars as in having played a part in the attempted coup this minimises the risk of losses through any against the Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez. 126 FEASTA REVIEW Number 2 FEASTA_Review_MAIN 10/18/04 11:55 AM Page 127 Semi-official confirmation that petro-currency switching to the euro as they recognise that their rivalry was at the heart of the split between France use of the dollar enables the US to build up its and Germany, on the one hand, and the US, on military strength.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Prices, Business Cycles, and Financial Crises the Argument for Cycle Attenuation
    Business and Financial Cycles Post-Bretton-Woods Problems Energy Prices, Business Cycles, and Financial Crises The Argument for Cycle Attenuation Mahmoud A. El-Gamal & Amy M. JaVe Rice University & Baker Institute for Public Policy October 2008 Mahmoud A. El-Gamal & Amy M. JaVe – London, October 27, 2008 Energy Prices, Business Cycles, and Financial Crises Business and Financial Cycles Financial Crises and Energy Prices Post-Bretton-Woods Problems The Role of Recycled Petrodollars Frequency and Causes of Crises Globalizations Past and Present Reckless Lending Era 1850s–1870s: Major currency and banking crises Gold Standard Era 1880–1913: Some currency and banking crises Between Wars 1919–1939: Numerous currency and banking crises Bretton Woods 1945–1971: Many currency crises but no banking crises Dollar Era 1973–present: Numerous currency & many banking crises Trade surpluses, Reckless Lending, and Recent Crises 1980–present: 1980s Scandinavia & Latin America: Reckless lending fueled bubbles that collapsed with oil prices, leading to currency and banking crises 1990s Japan, Asia: Supporting the Dollar and reckless lending fueled bubbles, which burst with tightened monetary policy, banking crisis 2000s Contagion + record U.S. debt pose substantial global-systemic risk Mahmoud A. El-Gamal & Amy M. JaVe – London, October 27, 2008 Energy Prices, Business Cycles, and Financial Crises Business and Financial Cycles Financial Crises and Energy Prices Post-Bretton-Woods Problems The Role of Recycled Petrodollars Coincidence of High Oil Prices with Financial Crises Crises Severest 1850s-70s (before gold standard), and 1970s– (after Bretton Woods) 120 100 80 60 Brent Oil Price in 2006 Dollars 40 20 0 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Mahmoud A.
    [Show full text]
  • GCC Oil Exporters and the Future of the Dollar Forthcoming in New Political Economy
    Title: GCC Oil Exporters and the Future of the Dollar Forthcoming in New Political Economy Author: Bessma Momani- Assistant Professor University of Waterloo and Senior Fellow, Centre for International Governance and Innovation Bio: Dr. Bessma Momani is Assistant Professor at the University of Waterloo and a Senior Fellow at the Centre for International Governance and Innovation. Dr. Momani has written on the US Middle East Free Trade Area, Euro-Med initiative, economic integration of the GCC, EU-GCC free trade agreement, economic liberalization in Egypt, and extensively on the International Monetary Fund. In addition to three monographs, her articles have appeared in World Economics, International Journal, Review of International Political Economy, Review of International Organizations, World Economy, Global Society, Middle East Review of International Affairs, New Political Economy, Canadian Journal of Political Science, and Asian Affairs. Abstract: Since the early 1970s, the oil-exporting states of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) led by Saudi Arabia, have played a key role in supporting the value of the US dollar by invoicing oil trade oil in dollars and by investing in US dollar reserves and securities. However, the United States‟ negative fiscal and current account positions have made many nervous about the sustainability of the US dollar as an international reserve currency. This article asks whether the GCC oil exporters will undermine the future of the dollar. Three factors are considered: the GCC‟s influence in changing the dollar-based invoicing of oil; emerging patterns in petrodollar recycling; and, the potential for diversification of GCC official reserves. The findings of this article suggest that despite some economic rationales in favour of loosening ties to the dollar, in the short term at least, the GCC will remain loyal to the dollar for political and security reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • View and Download the End of the Present Here
    THE END OF THE PRESENT T This publication draws together critical H reflection, speculative fiction, and collective E research to consider the ‘long crises’ of capitalism and the environment. It explores E the different forms of time in which N financial and environmental crises are D located, and how we as humans experience these massive events. O F Curator and artist Angela Chan and artist, writer and lecturer Emily Rosamond present T their own takes on time and crises, each H in response to the question ‘when does a E crisis begin and end?’ Emily Rosamond’s essay, Swarm Signals, connects astrophysics P to financial markets to question causality R and influence. Angela Chan’s short story, E Blurred Events, takes us to a near future in S which pandemic time blurs world politics. E N Jumping off from The End of the Present, T an online residency with Arts Catalyst, our quasi factual writing runs throughout this publication. Each narrative develops research undertaken by participants in public online co-research workshops where we collectively mapped events across recent and deep timescales. Our texts are a time(un)line of connections, which attempt to unravel cause and effect, and undo linear readings of history. Ruth Beale & Amy Feneck, The Alternative School of Economics 2 T H E E N D O F T H E P R E TIME(UN)LINE S E N The Alternative School T of Economics 3 T PINK ICE H E The Antarctic Treaty System, the post- colonial promise to ‘continue forever to E be used exclusively for peaceful purposes’ A N ends in 2048.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the 'Locomotive' Runs: the Impact of the – Oil Shock on Japan and the International Financi
    Financial History Review . (), pp. –. © The Author(s), . Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Association for Banking and Financial History. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:./S Before the ‘locomotive’ runs: the impact of the – oil shock on Japan and the international financial system KAZUHIKO YAGO Waseda University This article offers a Japanese perspective on the debate about the international financial system immedi- ately after the first oil shock of –. Using archival records from the OECD and Bank of Japan, I analyze the three key policy issues discussed at the meetings of Working Party (WP) of the OECD: petrodollar recycling, balance-of-payments adjustments, and the management of global growth. Documents show that the Japanese approach to capital controls, exchange rate management, state-led growth orientation and international banking strategies was rather strengthened by the impact of the oil shock. By the OECD viewed Japan, together with Germany and the United States, as one of the ‘locomotives’ that would trigger a revival of economic growth in the industrialized West. Keywords: petrodollars, recycling, balance-of-payment adjustment, OECD, Japan JEL codes: F,F,N,N,N I The oil shock of the s is considered one of the most momentous events in the transformation of the world economy, along with the Nixon shock (Maier ). The fourfold increase in the oil price (from $. to $. per barrel between October and January ) caused by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) shook the foundations of capitalist economies, which until then had enjoyed a plentiful supply of cheap oil under a fixed exchange rate regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins and Consequences of Oil Price Shocks
    Department of Economics and Finance – Chair of Money and Banking ORIGINS AND CONSEQUENCES OF OIL PRICE SHOCKS SUPERVISOR Prof. Paolo Paesani CANDIDATE Riccardo Ambrogi Matr. 184651 ACADEMIC YEAR 2015 / 2016 Index Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Chapter 1: The Macroeconomic Reactions to Oil Price Shocks ................................................ 5 1. Oil prices over time .................................................................................................................... 5 2. Oil Shocks Propagation Channels ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 Oil Price Shocks and Recession ............................................................................................. 9 2.1.1 Effects of an Oil Price Decrease on Output Growth .................................................... 12 2.2 Oil Price Shock and Inflation ............................................................................................... 13 2.3 Modelling the Macroeconomic Impact of Oil Price Shocks ............................................ 14 2.3.1 First Round Effects........................................................................................................ 15 2.3.2 Second Round Effects .................................................................................................... 16 3. Different Effects of Oil Price Shocks Over time ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\TJH...V
    ! " #$%& $& "''WvrDCr r (! )* +* & +* & # , * -./ 0 & 12,33 /23 Qr qyyh Xh sh rhq8yyhrsVT9yyh Dr vhyv vur! 8r N "The term 'petrodollar' is a macroeconomic term that is little understood and even less discussed in the major news media today. Exactly how a petrodollar exchange system has helped maintain the US dollar as the world's reserve currency is a general theme in my book and will be the focus of this special report. As William Clark suggests in his book Petrodollar Warfare, the current 'war on terror' has been exploited by the neocons in an effort to establish permanent US military bases in the Persian Gulf and also 'dissuade' other nations from switching their crude oil contracts into an emerging euro currency. In what is now being called the first oil currency war of the 21st century, the Iraqi War in 2003 was more about protecting US dollar imperialism and preventing a 'petroeuro exchange system' than the alleged threat of WMDs or terrorist links to Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network. As William Clark is careful to point out, Saddam Hussein had begun to price Iraqi oil contracts in euros starting in November 2000 and the US government was determined to put a stop to this crude/euro currency peg, which they successfully did in the summer of 2003. As Clark mentions:" Not surprisingly, the US corporate media has not run a single news story on the reconversion of Iraq’s oil exports from petroeuros to petrodollars….This hidden fact [has] helped illuminate one of the crucial, yet over-looked macroeconomic rationales for the 2003 Iraqi War.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERISITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE the Petrodollar Era And
    UNIVERISITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE The Petrodollar Era and Relations between the United States and the Middle East and North Africa, 1969-1980 DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History by David M. Wight Dissertation Committee: Professor Emily S. Rosenberg, chair Professor Mark LeVine Associate Professor Salim Yaqub 2014 © 2014 David M. Wight DEDICATION To Michelle ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi CURRICULUM VITAE vii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION x INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: The Road to the Oil Shock 14 CHAPTER 2: Structuring Petrodollar Flows 78 CHAPTER 3: Visions of Petrodollar Promise and Peril 127 CHAPTER 4: The Triangle to the Nile 189 CHAPTER 5: The Carter Administration and the Petrodollar-Arms Complex 231 CONCLUSION 277 BIBLIOGRAPHY 287 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1 Sectors of the MENA as Percentage of World GNI, 1970-1977 19 Figure 1.2 Selected Countries as Percentage of World GNI, 1970-1977 20 Figure 1.3 Current Account Balances of the Non-Communist World, 1970-1977 22 Figure 1.4 Value of US Exports to the MENA, 1946-1977 24 Figure 5.1 US Military Sales Agreements per Fiscal Year, 1970-1980 255 iv LIST OF TABLES Page Table 2.1 Net Change in Deployment of OPEC’s Capital Surplus, 1974-1976 120 Table 5.1 US Military Sales Agreements per Fiscal Year, 1970-1980 256 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a cliché that one accumulates countless debts while writing a monograph, but in researching and writing this dissertation I have come to learn the depth of the truth of this statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the PTB...The Effects of the Impending Iranian Oil Bourse... Posted by Prof
    The Oil Drum | Continuing on thhet tph:e/m/wew owf .tthhee omilidnrdusmet.(cso)m o/fc tlahses PicT/B2.0.0.t5h/e0 8e/ffceocnttsi nouf inthge- oInm-ptheenmdien-go fI-rmaniniadns eOtsil- Bofo.uhrtmsel... Continuing on the theme of the mindset(s) of the PTB...the effects of the Impending Iranian Oil Bourse... Posted by Prof. Goose on August 9, 2005 - 4:46am Well, first it was Dave C's piece on Iraq, then yesterday's link to Big Gav's piece about Iraq...and now we turn to Iran and petrocurrency. A n interesting piece by William Clark posted today at both Energy Bulletin and Flying Talkin' Donkey (NB: Fo4 has yet another neat news interface, and this is my favorite so far, actually. Go check it out.). Here's a quote from the Clark piece, which is very provocative and provides reasoning for the Iran/Iraq petroeuro/dollar connection: It is now obvious the invasion of Iraq had less to do with any threat from Saddam's long- gone WMD program and certainly less to do to do with fighting International terrorism than it has to do with gaining strategic control over Iraq's hydrocarbon reserves and in doing so maintain the U.S. dollar as the monopoly currency for the critical international oil market. Throughout 2004 information provided by former administration insiders revealed the Bush/Cheney administration entered into office with the intention of toppling Saddam Hussein. Contemporary warfare has traditionally involved underlying conflicts regarding economics and resources. Today these intertwined conflicts also involve international currencies, and thus increased complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petrodollars and the World Economy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lütkenhorst, Wilfried; Minte, Horst Article — Digitized Version The petrodollars and the world economy Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Lütkenhorst, Wilfried; Minte, Horst (1979) : The petrodollars and the world economy, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 84-89, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02930203 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/139600 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu RECYCLING The Petrodollars and the World Economy by Wilfried LStkenhorst, Horst Minte, Bochum * The quadrupling of the oil price by the OPEC in 1973 was a poignant event in the post-war develop- ment of the world economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Varying Relationship Between Oil Price and Exchange Rate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Munich RePEc Personal Archive MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Time-varying relationship between oil price and exchange rate C´esar Castro Rozo and Rebeca Jim´enez-Rodr´ıguez Universidad de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca 28 March 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/87879/ MPRA Paper No. 87879, posted 13 July 2018 12:51 UTC Time-varying relationship between oil price and exchange rate César Castro∗1 and Rebeca Jiménez-Rodríguez†2 1Department of Economics, University of Salamanca, Spain. 2Department of Economics, IME, University of Salamanca, Spain. March 28, 2018 Abstract This paper contributes to better understand the dynamic interaction between U.S. effective exchange rate (EER) and oil price by considering a Time-Varying Parameter VAR model with the use of monthly data from 1974 to 2017. Our findings show a depreciation after an oil price shock in the short-run for any period of time, although the pattern of long-run responses of U.S. EER is diverse across different period of time, with an appreciation being observed before the mid-2000s and a depreciation af- terwards. This diversity of response should lead policy makers to react differently in order to counteract such shocks. Furthermore, the reaction of oil price to an appreciation of U.S. EER is negative, with the response being similar in the short-run but different in the long-run for each period of time. Thus, the different responses may generate different adverse ef- fects on investment and the knowledge of such effects may help financial investors to diversify their investments in order to optimize the risk-return profile of their portfolios.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Two Pillars of US Global Hegemony: Middle Eastern Oil and the Petrodollar
    Two pillars of US global hegemony: Middle Eastern oil and the petrodollar [W]hoever controls the Middle East controls the global oil spigot and whoever controls the global oil spigot can control the global economy, at least for the near future. (Harvey 2005: 19) Throughout recent history, the oil-rich regions of the Middle East have played a key role in determining US foreign policy, This is simply because the Middle Eastern oil regions currently account for 65 per cent of the world’s proven oil reserves, and 30 per cent of its day-to-day production, and therefore the Middle East has been the geographic centre of gravity of the world oil industry (Renner 2003). They are therefore a truly vital strategic US interest. Since the new and bountiful discoveries of cheaper oil in the Persian Gulf just after the Second World War, oil from the Middle East has gradually come to displace US oil. Without direct and secure access to this resource, the world economy would fall into a very serious crisis, and the position of the leading power, the US, would be dealt a mortal blow. In order to continue growing, the US-dominated world capitalist economy needs plenty of cheap and readily available oil. The Middle East supplied 22 per cent of US oil imports, 36 per cent of OECD Europe’s, 40 per cent of China’s, 60 per cent of India’s, and 80 per cent of Japan’s and South Korea’s in 2006 (Energy Information AdministrationAnnual Energy Review 2006). But this dimension cannot be reduced solely to matters of economic prosperity, even though it represents a part.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycling OPEC Oil Revenues and Resurrecting the Dollar, and the U.S. International Payments Position in American Foreign Policy, 1970–1975
    Recycling OPEC Oil Revenues and Resurrecting the Dollar, and the U.S. International Payments Position in American Foreign Policy, 1970–1975 Simone Selva hroughout the 1960s, U.S. Tgovernments, first and foremost the John Kennedy administration, worked to restore a deteriorating U.S. international balance of payments through a set of measures based on combined Petrodollars were the vital critical financial link that connected the intervention in both the OPEC oil-producing countries, American banks, and the LDCs. current and the capital account positions. 1 On one side, Washington intervened on the current account position both to reduce liabilities and to improve assets by means of cutting overseas military expenses and increasing U.S. military and civilian exports, respectively. On the other side, throughout the decade U.S. governments passed a number of laws aimed at discouraging U.S. banks from propping up capital exports. The failure of such measures to forestall capital flight, combined with a staggering rise in the scale of overseas investments of U.S. corporations through either direct or portfolio investments during the 1960s, as well as the rise of U.S. public expenditures in connection with the Vietnam War, set conditions for a weakening dollar in the foreign exchange markets that fundamentally contributed to undermine the dollar’s convertibility into gold. Making matters worse, the combined appearance of oil price hikes from around 1967 to the Teheran conference of 1971, when the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) increased taxes on foreign oil corporations that produced oil compounds on their soils, expanded the share of dollar-denominated Simone Selva is an assistant professor of economic history at the University of Naples L’Orientale and a visiting scholar at University College London, Institute of Advanced Study.
    [Show full text]