DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding and Enhancing Sensitivity in Receivers for Wireless Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding and Enhancing Sensitivity in Receivers for Wireless Applications Technical Brief SWRA030 Understanding and Enhancing Sensitivity in Receivers for Wireless Applications Edited by Matt Loy Wireless Communication Business Unit Abstract This technical brief provides an overview of communication receiver sensitivity. One of the most important parameters in determining the overall performance of a communication system, receiver sensitivity translates directly into communication distance and reliability. A few receiver architectures can offer dependable communication at low cost, if proper design procedures and trade-offs are implemented. RF amplifiers, mixers, and filters are common circuit building blocks for every architecture. System performance is tied to each individual block comprising the receiver. Each circuit generates noise that degrades reception of the desired signal. Understanding noise sources and the methods of minimizing degradation allows optimal design trade-offs for a given cost. Circuit nonlinearity causes undesired signals to hinder the reception of desired signals. A low-noise system design typically does not produce the best linearity, and high linearity typically produces more noise. A thorough understanding of the receiver RF environment can help your design achieve the proper specifications for optimal noise and linearity. Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 4 Receiver Architectures .............................................................................................................................. 4 Homodyne (Zero IF) Receiver......................................................................................................... 4 Heterodyne Receiver...................................................................................................................... 6 Access Methods and Modulation Schemes ................................................................................................ 7 Access Methods............................................................................................................................. 7 Modulation Schemes.................................................................................................................... 10 Receiver Building Blocks......................................................................................................................... 16 Antenna....................................................................................................................................... 17 Duplexers .................................................................................................................................... 18 Low-Noise Amplifier (LNA) ........................................................................................................... 19 RF Filters..................................................................................................................................... 19 Mixers.......................................................................................................................................... 20 Local Oscillator ............................................................................................................................ 22 IF Filter ........................................................................................................................................ 23 IF Amplifier .................................................................................................................................. 23 Detectors ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Receiver Sensitivity................................................................................................................................. 24 Noise of Two-Port Networks ......................................................................................................... 25 Noise Temperature....................................................................................................................... 29 Digital Signal Processing Solutions May 1999 Noise Figure ................................................................................................................................ 32 Cascaded Noise Temperature ......................................................................................................37 Cascaded Noise Figure................................................................................................................ 40 Lossy Two-Port Noise Figure........................................................................................................ 42 Mixer Noise Figure....................................................................................................................... 44 Minimum Detectable Signal .......................................................................................................... 46 Signal-to-Noise Ratio ................................................................................................................... 48 Sensitivity .................................................................................................................................... 50 Phase Noise ................................................................................................................................ 50 Receiver Nonlinear Performance ............................................................................................................. 51 Gain Compression ....................................................................................................................... 51 Intermodulation Distortion............................................................................................................. 54 Dynamic Range ........................................................................................................................... 60 Blocking....................................................................................................................................... 62 Spur-Free Dynamic Range ........................................................................................................... 63 Undesired Spurious Responses.................................................................................................... 64 Self-Quieters................................................................................................................................ 67 Receiver Design Trade-Offs .................................................................................................................... 67 Summary................................................................................................................................................ 70 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 70 References ............................................................................................................................................. 74 Figures Figure 1. Homodyne (Zero-IF) Receiver............................................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Dual-Conversion Superheterodyne Receiver ......................................................................... 6 Figure 3. User Time Slots for TDMA Example ...................................................................................... 8 Figure 4. Frequency Channels for FDMA Example............................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Modulation Schemes .......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Constellation Diagram (I/Q Plot) .......................................................................................... 12 Figure 7. OQPSK State Diagram ....................................................................................................... 13 Figure 8. π/4-DQPSK State Diagram.................................................................................................. 14 Figure 9. 16QAM State Diagram........................................................................................................ 15 Figure 10. Receiver Components ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 11. Mixer Driven by LO Signal .................................................................................................. 21 Figure 12. I/Q Detector........................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 13. Complex Source Connected to Complex Conjugate Load Termination ................................. 25 Figure 14. Thermal Noise Visualized as Signal Generators .................................................................. 26 Figure 15. Filter Response Equated to Brick-Wall Filter Response........................................................ 27 Figure 16. Two-Port Network Connection for Available Gain Definition.................................................. 29 Figure 17. Available Thermal Noise (Noise Temperature)..................................................................... 30 Figure 18. Noise Output Power Versus Source Temperature (Noise Temperature) ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Basic Concepts in RF Design
    Chapter 2 Basic Concepts in RF Design 1 Sections to be covered • 2.1 General Considerations • 2.2 Effects of Nonlinearity • 2.3 Noise • 2.4 Sensitivity and Dynamic Range • 2.5 Passive Impedance Transformation 2 Chapter Outline Nonlinearity Noise Impedance Harmonic Distortion Transformation Compression Noise Spectrum Intermodulation Device Noise Series-Parallel Noise in Circuits Conversion Matching Networks 3 The Big Picture: Generic RF Transceiver Overall transceiver Signals are upconverted/downconverted at TX/RX, by an oscillator controlled by a Frequency Synthesizer. 4 General Considerations: Units in RF Design Voltage gain: rms value Power gain: These two quantities are equal (in dB) only if the input and output impedance are equal. Example： an amplifier having an input resistance of R0 (e.g., 50 Ω) and driving a load resistance of R0 : 5 where Vout and Vin are rms value. General Considerations: Units in RF Design “dBm” The absolute signal levels are often expressed in dBm (not in watts or volts); Used for power quantities, the unit dBm refers to “dB’s above 1mW”. To express the signal power, Psig, in dBm, we write 6 Example of Units in RF An amplifier senses a sinusoidal signal and delivers a power of 0 dBm to a load resistance of 50 Ω. Determine the peak-to-peak voltage swing across the load. Solution: a sinusoid signal having a peak-to-peak amplitude of Vpp an rms value of Vpp/(2√2), 0dBm is equivalent to 1mW, where RL= 50 Ω thus, 7 Example of Units in RF A GSM receiver senses a narrowband (modulated) signal having a level of -100 dBm.
    [Show full text]
  • Wideband Automatic Gain Control Design in 130 Nm CMOS Process for Wireless Receiver Applications
    Wideband Automatic Gain Control Design in 130 nm CMOS Process for Wireless Receiver Applications A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering By Joseph Benito Strzelecki, B.S. Wright State University, 2013 2015 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL _August 19, 2015_______ I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Joseph Benito Strzelecki ENTITLED Wideband Automatic Gain Control Design in 130 nm CMOS Process for Wireless Receiver Applications BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Engineering. ___________________________________ Saiyu Ren, Ph.D. Thesis Director ___________________________________ Brian D. Rigling, Ph.D. Department Chair Committee on Final Examination ________________________________ Saiyu Ren, Ph.D. ________________________________ Raymond E. Siferd, Ph.D. ________________________________ John M. Emmert, Ph.D. ________________________________ Arnab K. Shaw, Ph.D. ________________________________ Robert E. W. Fyffe, Ph.D. Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School Abstract Strzelecki, Joseph Benito, M.S.Egr, Department of Electrical Engineering, Wright State University, 2015. “Wideband Automatic Gain Control Design in 130 nm CMOS Process for Wireless Receiver Applications” An analog automatic gain control circuit (AGC) and mixer were implemented in 130 nm CMOS technology. The proposed AGC was intended for implementation into a wireless receiver chain. Design specifications required a 60 dB tuning range on the output of the AGC, a settling time within several microseconds, and minimum circuit complexity to reduce area usage and power consumption. Desired AGC functionality was achieved through the use of four nonlinear variable gain amplifiers (VGAs) and a single LC filter in the forward path of the circuit and a control loop containing an RMS power detector, a multistage comparator, and a charging capacitor.
    [Show full text]
  • NTGAN: Learning Blind Image Denoising Without Clean Reference
    RUI ZHAO, DANIEL P.K. LUN, KIN-MAN LAM: NTGAN 1 NTGAN: Learning Blind Image Denoising without Clean Reference Rui Zhao Department of Electronic and [email protected] Information Engineering, Daniel P.K. Lun The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, [email protected] Hong Kong, China Kin-Man Lam [email protected] Abstract Recent studies on learning-based image denoising have achieved promising perfor- mance on various noise reduction tasks. Most of these deep denoisers are trained ei- ther under the supervision of clean references, or unsupervised on synthetic noise. The assumption with the synthetic noise leads to poor generalization when facing real pho- tographs. To address this issue, we propose a novel deep unsupervised image-denoising method by regarding the noise reduction task as a special case of the noise transference task. Learning noise transference enables the network to acquire the denoising ability by only observing the corrupted samples. The results on real-world denoising benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on remov- ing realistic noises, making it a potential solution to practical noise reduction problems. 1 Introduction Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely studied over the past decade in various computer vision applications, including image classification [13], object detection [29], and image restoration [35]. In spite of high effectiveness, CNN models always require a large-scale dataset with reliable reference for training. However, in terms of low-level vision tasks, such as image denoising and image super-resolution, the reliable reference data is generally hard to access, which makes these tasks more challenging and difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Automatic Level Control
    Maxim > Design Support > Technical Documents > Application Notes > Audio Circuits > APP 3673 Keywords: MAX9756, ALC, Automatic Level Control, AGC, Automatic Gain Control, Maxim APPLICATION NOTE 3673 An Overview of Automatic Level Control Dec 22, 2005 Abstract: Automatic Level Control (ALC) is a technology that automatically controls output power to the speaker. ALC prevents loudspeaker overload and optimizes dynamic range. This application note presents ALC technology and demonstrates its use in the MAX9756/MAX9757/MAX9758 stereo speaker amplifiers. Maxim's Automatic Level Control (ALC) offers two key benefits (Figures 1 and 2). 1. It protects the loudspeaker by limiting the amplifier output power. 2. It boosts low-level signals without distorting the high-level signals. ALC is implemented in the MAX9756, MAX9757, and MAX9758 2.3W stereo speaker amplifiers and DirectDrive headphone amplifiers. Attend this brief webcast by Maxim on TechOnline Figures 1 and 2. The MAX9756's automatic level control (ALC) function protects the speakers without adding distortion. ALC vs. Output Limiting ALC differs from traditional output limiting. An output-limiter function limits the output swing at a predetermined level so that the transducer is protected from overvoltage peaks. Clipping (distortion) is added Page 1 of 5 at the output signal as a result (Figure 3). An ALC function, however, reduces the gain so that the transducer is protected. No distortion is added (Figure 4). Figure 3. The output limiter clips the output signal in overvoltage conditions and, thus, produces audible distortion. Figure 4. The MAX9756's ALC reduces the amplifier gain in overvoltage conditions so that no distortion is added to the output signal.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Quality Self-Supervised Deep Image Denoising
    High-Quality Self-Supervised Deep Image Denoising Samuli Laine Tero Karras Jaakko Lehtinen Timo Aila NVIDIA∗ NVIDIA NVIDIA, Aalto University NVIDIA Abstract We describe a novel method for training high-quality image denoising models based on unorganized collections of corrupted images. The training does not need access to clean reference images, or explicit pairs of corrupted images, and can thus be applied in situations where such data is unacceptably expensive or im- possible to acquire. We build on a recent technique that removes the need for reference data by employing networks with a “blind spot” in the receptive field, and significantly improve two key aspects: image quality and training efficiency. Our result quality is on par with state-of-the-art neural network denoisers in the case of i.i.d. additive Gaussian noise, and not far behind with Poisson and impulse noise. We also successfully handle cases where parameters of the noise model are variable and/or unknown in both training and evaluation data. 1 Introduction Denoising, the removal of noise from images, is a major application of deep learning. Several architectures have been proposed for general-purpose image restoration tasks, e.g., U-Nets [23], hierarchical residual networks [20], and residual dense networks [31]. Traditionally, the models are trained in a supervised fashion with corrupted images as inputs and clean images as targets, so that the network learns to remove the corruption. Lehtinen et al. [17] introduced NOISE2NOISE training, where pairs of corrupted images are used as training data. They observe that when certain statistical conditions are met, a network faced with the impossible task of mapping corrupted images to corrupted images learns, loosely speaking, to output the “average” image.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Wideband Reconfigurable Blocker Tolerant Receiver for Cognitive Radio Applications a Disser
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Wideband Reconfigurable Blocker Tolerant Receiver for Cognitive Radio Applications A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering by Qaiser Nehal 2018 c Copyright by Qaiser Nehal 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Wideband Reconfigurable Blocker Tolerant Receiver for Cognitive Radio Applications by Qaiser Nehal Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Asad A. Abidi, Chair Cognitive radios (CRs) use \white spaces" in spectrum for communication. This requires front-end circuits that are highly linear when the white space is adjacent to a strong blocker. For example, in the TV spectrum (54 MHz-862 MHz) broadcast transmissions are the block- ers. This work describes the design of a wideband blocker tolerant receiver. First EKV based MOSFET model is used to analyze RF transconductor distortion. Expressions for its IIP3 and P1dB are also given. Derivative superposition based linearization scheme for the RF transconductor is also explained. Second mixer switch nonlinearity is analyzed using EKV. Simple expressions for receiver IIP3 and P1dB are given that provide design insights for linearity optimization. Low phase noise LO design is also described to lower receiver noise figure in the presence of large blockers. Finally, transimpedance amplifier (TIA) large-signal operation is studied using EKV. It is shown that source follower inverter-based TIA transconductor results in higher receiver P1dB. A prototype receiver based on these ideas was designed in 16nm FinFET CMOS. Mea- sured results show that receiver can operate from 100 MHz to 6 GHz and can tolerate up to +12 dBm blockers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gan Essentials™
    APPLICATION NOTE AN-010 GaN Essentials™ AN-010: GaN for LDMOS Users NITRONEX CORPORATION 1 JUNE 2008 APPLICATION NOTE AN-010 GaN Essentials: GaN for LDMOS Users 1. Table of Contents 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................... 2 2. ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................................................... 3 IMPEDANCE PROFILES.......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. INPUT IMPEDANCE .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. OUTPUT IMPEDANCE ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. STABILITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. CAPACITANCE VS. VOLTAGE ................................................................................................................... 6 4.1. TYPICAL CAPACITANCE -VOLTAGE (CV) CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................ 6 4.2. OUTPUT CAPACITANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN GAN AND LDMOS .................................................. 7 5. BIAS CIRCUITS................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing the Automatic Gain Control Loop in a Mobile, Digital TV Broadcast Receiver by a Software Based Solution
    Replacing the automatic gain control loop in a mobile, digital TV broadcast receiver by a software based solution diploma thesis Patrick Boettcher Technische Fachhochschule Wildau Fachbereich Betriebswirtschaft/Wirtschaftsinformatik Date: 09.03.2008 Erstbetreuer: Prof. Dr. Christian Müller Zweitbetreuer: Prof. Dr. Bernd Eylert ii A part of this diploma thesis is not available until April 2010, because it is protected by a lock flag. The complete work can and will be made available by that time. The parts affected are – Chapter 4, – Chapter 5, – Appendix C and – Appendix D. If by that time you cannot find the complete work anywhere, please contact the author. iii Danksagung An dieser Stelle möchte ich all jenen danken, die durch ihre fachliche und persönliche Unterstützung zum Gelingen dieser Diplomarbeit beigetragen haben. Besonderer Dank gebührt meiner Lebenspartnerin Ariane und meinen Eltern, die mir dieses Studium durch ihre Unterstützung ermöglicht haben und mir fortwährend Vorbild und Ansporn waren. Weiterhin bedanke ich mich bei Professor Dr. Christian Müller und Professor Dr. Bernd Eylert für die Betreuung dieser Diplomarbeit. Großer Dank gilt ebenfalls meinen Kollegen bei DiBcom S.A., die mir die Möglichkeit gaben, diese Arbeit zu verfassen und mich technich sehr stark unterstützten. Vor allem möchte ich mich in diesem Zusammenhang bei Jean-Philippe Sibers bedanken, der mir immer mit einer Inspriration zur Seite stand. Gleiches gilt für das „Physical Layer Software Team“: Luc Banda, Frédéric Tarral und Vincent Recrosio. Acknowledgment I want to use this opportunity to thank everyone who supported me personally and professionally to create this diploma thesis. Special thanks appertain to my partner Ariane and my parents, who supported me during my studies and who continuously guided and motivated me.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Topic: NOISE
    ECE145A/ECE218A Performance Limitations of Amplifiers 1. Distortion in Nonlinear Systems The upper limit of useful operation is limited by distortion. All analog systems and components of systems (amplifiers and mixers for example) become nonlinear when driven at large signal levels. The nonlinearity distorts the desired signal. This distortion exhibits itself in several ways: 1. Gain compression or expansion (sometimes called AM – AM distortion) 2. Phase distortion (sometimes called AM – PM distortion) 3. Unwanted frequencies (spurious outputs or spurs) in the output spectrum. For a single input, this appears at harmonic frequencies, creating harmonic distortion or HD. With multiple input signals, in-band distortion is created, called intermodulation distortion or IMD. When these spurs interfere with the desired signal, the S/N ratio or SINAD (Signal to noise plus distortion ratio) is degraded. Gain Compression. The nonlinear transfer characteristic of the component shows up in the grossest sense when the gain is no longer constant with input power. That is, if Pout is no longer linearly related to Pin, then the device is clearly nonlinear and distortion can be expected. Pout Pin P1dB, the input power required to compress the gain by 1 dB, is often used as a simple to measure index of gain compression. An amplifier with 1 dB of gain compression will generate severe distortion. Distortion generation in amplifiers can be understood by modeling the amplifier’s transfer characteristic with a simple power series function: 3 VaVaVout=−13 in in Of course, in a real amplifier, there may be terms of all orders present, but this simple cubic nonlinearity is easy to visualize.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Deep Image Priors for Blind Image Denoising
    Learning Deep Image Priors for Blind Image Denoising Xianxu Hou 1 Hongming Luo 1 Jingxin Liu 1 Bolei Xu 1 Ke Sun 2 Yuanhao Gong 1 Bozhi Liu 1 Guoping Qiu 1,3 1 College of Information Engineering and Guangdong Key Lab for Intelligent Information Processing, Shenzhen University, China 2 School of Computer Science, The University of Nottingham Ningbo China 3 School of Computer Science, The University of Nottingham, UK Abstract ods comes from the effective image prior modeling over the input images [5, 14, 20]. State of the art model-based meth- Image denoising is the process of removing noise from ods such as BM3D [12] and WNNM [20] can be further noisy images, which is an image domain transferring task, extended to remove unknown noises. However, there are a i.e., from a single or several noise level domains to a photo- few drawbacks of these methods. First, these methods usu- realistic domain. In this paper, we propose an effective im- ally involve a complex and time-consuming optimization age denoising method by learning two image priors from process in the testing stage. Second, the image priors em- the perspective of domain alignment. We tackle the domain ployed in most of these approaches are hand-crafted, such alignment on two levels. 1) the feature-level prior is to learn as nonlocal self-similarity and gradients, which are mainly domain-invariant features for corrupted images with differ- based on the internal information of the input image without ent level noise; 2) the pixel-level prior is used to push the any external information.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Steps to Selecting the Right RF Power Amplifier
    modular rf 5 Steps to Selecting the Right RF Power Amplifier Jason Kovatch Sr. Development Engineer AR Modular RF, Bothell WA You need an RF power amplifier. You have measured the power of your signal and it is not enough. You may even have decided on a power level in Watts that you think will meet your needs. Are you ready to shop for an amplifier of that wattage? With so many variations in price, size, and efficiency for amplifiers that are all rated at the same number of Watts many RF amplifier purchasers are unhappy with their selection. Some of the unfortunate results of amplifier selection by Watts include: unacceptable distortion or interference, insufficient gain, premature amplifier failure, and wasted money. Following these 5 steps will help you avoid these mistakes. Step 1 - Know Your Signal Step 2 – Do the Math Step 3 - Window Shopping Step 4 - Compare Apples to Apples Step 5 – Shopping for Bells and Whistles Step 1 – Know Your Signal You need to know 2 things about your signal: what type of modulation is on the signal and the actual Peak power of your signal to be amplified. Knowing the modulation is the most important as it defines broad variations in amplifiers that will provide acceptable performance. Knowing the Peak power of your signal will allow you calculate your gain and/or power requirements, as shown in later steps. Signal Modulation and Power- CW, SSB, FM, and PM are Easy To avoid distortion, amplifiers need to be able to faithfully process your signal’s peak power.
    [Show full text]
  • Layered Neural Rendering for Retiming People in Video
    Layered Neural Rendering for Retiming People in Video ERIKA LU, University of Oxford, Google Research FORRESTER COLE, Google Research TALI DEKEL, Google Research WEIDI XIE, University of Oxford ANDREW ZISSERMAN, University of Oxford DAVID SALESIN, Google Research WILLIAM T. FREEMAN, Google Research MICHAEL RUBINSTEIN, Google Research Input Video Frame t Frame t1 (child I jumps) Frame t2 (child II jumps) Frame t3 (child III jumps) Our Retiming Result Our Output Layers Frame t1 (all stand) Frame t2 (all jump) Frame t3 (all in water) Fig. 1. Making all children jump into the pool together — in post-processing! In the original video (left, top) each child is jumping into the poolata different time. In our computationally retimed video (left, bottom), the jumps of children I and III are time-aligned with that of child II, such thattheyalljump together into the pool (notice that child II remains unchanged in the input and output frames). In this paper, we present a method to produce this and other people retiming effects in natural, ordinary videos. Our method is based on a novel deep neural network that learns a layered decomposition oftheinput video (right). Our model not only disentangles the motions of people in different layers, but can also capture the various scene elements thatare correlated with those people (e.g., water splashes as the children hit the water, shadows, reflections). When people are retimed, those related elements get automatically retimed with them, which allows us to create realistic and faithful re-renderings of the video for a variety of retiming effects. The full input and retimed sequences are available in the supplementary video.
    [Show full text]