DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Erosion Planning & Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coastal Erosion Planning & Response Coastal Erosion Planning & Response Act A REPORT TO THE 86TH LEGISLATURE Texas General Land Office George P. Bush, Commissioner Cover Imagery, clockwise from top: Breakwaters at Virginia Point; lifeguard stand on Galveston Island beach; newly constructed dune ridge along County Road 257, Brazoria County; newly forming foredunes at McFaddin Beach; Marsh Mania Event 2017 at Dickinson Bayou (Imagery courtesy of Galveston Bay Foundation); freshly planted marsh mounds at Galveston Island State Park. needed and the CEPRA Program is establishing new opportunities to coordinate and leverage funding sources to implement larger, more impacting projects. The GLO’s Coastal Resources (CR) Division recently released the Texas Coastal Resiliency Master Plan (Master Plan). The GLO is amending the CEPRA rules to allow Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA) funds to be used in coordination with CEPRA funds to construct Tier 1 projects outlined in the Master Plan. CEPRA is also teaming up with CR’ Resource Management team to leverage a historic amount of civil and criminal penalty funds from the Deepwater Horizon spill with Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA), National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), and Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States Act (RESTORE) funding sources. George P. Bush, Commissioner, Texas General Land Office However, these funds will not always be available and A MESSAGE FROM THE COMMISIONER are not enough to sufficiently protect the Texas coast. Despite these efforts and new funding opportunities, Honorable Members of the 86th Texas Legislature, I am Texas continues to lack millions of dollars needed to pleased to submit the FY18-19 Biennial Report on the meet project needs of our coastal communities. It is Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act (CEPRA) imperative to establish a permanent source for CEPRA Program. This report covers current CEPRA Cycle 10 Program funding. The 86th legislature has the projects and projects that have been completed since opportunity to enact the Hotel Occupancy Tax Bill which the preceding legislative session. The projects would allow 2% of coastal counties state occupancy tax showcased in this report underscore the important work revenue to be contributed directly to the CEPRA the CEPRA Program does in maintaining Texas’ barrier Program account. It is critical that we take this island and bay systems. These features are critical opportunity to secure these funds to sustain the components for ensuring a strong and resilient Texas increasingly important positive impacts the CEPRA coastal ecosystem and economy. Whether it is a natural Program has on Texas’ coast as CEPRA remains a true hazard or economic fluctuation that alters how a coastal steward of Texas’ precious coastal resources. system operates, CEPRA projects help local communities and industry be more resilient to and I am constantly amazed at what was accomplished this recover from continuous coastal change. These last biennium, and I feel certain you will be, too. I look projects act as the first line of defense from hurricanes, forward to our continued partnership in protecting the tropical storms, and high tides, while enhancing security and economy of the Texas coast. The CEPRA recreational, fishing, and hunting opportunities. CEPRA Legislative report may be downloaded at projects also ensure protection of billions of dollars in http://www.glo.texas.gov/coast/coastal- coastal infrastructure and the energy, chemical, and management/forms/files/cepra-report-2019.pdf. tourism industries. For additional information or to request hard copies of The 85th Legislature appropriated $14,271,940 million this report, please contact Kevin Frenzel at to the Texas General Land Office (GLO) to administer 512-463-2482. the CEPRA Program for Cycle 10 projects. CEPRA funds were leveraged against $133 million in matching funds from federal and local sources. To further CEPRA’s positive impacts, additional funds are critically Coastal Erosion Planning & Response Act ii 2018-2019 Report Weeks Marine Dredge Vessel at Galveston Seawall TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 AREAS OF CRITICAL EROSION ............................................................................................................................... 2 ENACTING THE CEPRA PROGRAM ......................................................................................................................... 3 FINANCIAL STATUS OF THE CEPRA ACCOUNT ...................................................................................................... 5 FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS ..................................................................................................................... 6 FINANCIAL PROGRAM SHORTFALLS ...................................................................................................................... 6 GOMESA FUNDS ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 IMPLEMENTING TIER 1 PROJECTS OF THE TEXAS COASTAL RESILIENCY MASTER PLAN .................................... 7 RESTORATION PARTNERSHIPS MAKING A BIG CHANGE ....................................................................................... 8 THE NEED FOR THE CEPRA PROGRAM .................................................................................................................. 8 ECONOMIC AND NATURAL RESOURCE BENEFITS OF THE CEPRA PROGRAM .................................................... 10 CEPRA PROJECTS EVALUATED IN THE ECONOMIC STUDIES REPORT ............................................................... 13 CEPRA CYCLE 10 PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 20 CYCLE 10 PROJECT NAMES AND TYPES .............................................................................................................. 21 BUDM PROJECTS ................................................................................................................................................. 22 BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECTS ...................................................................................................................... 24 SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECTS .................................................................................................................. 26 STRUCTURE RELOCATION PROJECT ................................................................................................................... 30 HARVEY REPAIR PROJECTS ................................................................................................................................ 31 STUDIES ............................................................................................................................................................... 35 WORKS CITED ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 Marsh Mania 2017 at Dickinson Bayou; photo courtesy of Galveston Bay Foundation LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Texas Gulf Shoreline Change ..................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. CEPRA Project 1530 McFaddin Beach and Dune Restoration ........................................... 3 Figure 3. CEPRA Project 1601 West Galveston Island Marsh Restoration ....................................... 3 Figure 4. CEPRA Project Number 1572 Dickinson Marsh Restoration ............................................. 4 Figure 5. CEPRA Project 1657 Structure Relocation 214 Jettyview Road Surfside, Texas ......... 4 Figure 6. CEPRA Project 1604 Indianola Beach BMMP Beach Nourishment ................................... 4 Figure 7. Texas Coastal Master Plan Regions and Projects ................................................................. 7 Figure 8. Galveston Island Shoreline Change Rates .............................................................................. 8 Figure 9. Extracted Lidar Post-Harvey ........................................................................................................ 9 Figure 10. Least Tern Nest Locations McFaddin Pilot Project ............................................................ 9 Figure 11. Economic Study Report Project Locations.......................................................................... 13 Figure 12. CR 257 Dune Restoration ....................................................................................................... 14 Figure 13. McFaddin Shoreline ................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 14. Galveston Seawall Beach ......................................................................................................... 15 Figure 15. Dickinson Bayou Marsh Cells A & B ..................................................................................... 15 Figure 16. SPI Beach ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 17. Breakwater Marsh Cells ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • National Coastal Condition Assessment 2010
    You may use the information and images contained in this document for non-commercial, personal, or educational purposes only, provided that you (1) do not modify such information and (2) include proper citation. If material is used for other purposes, you must obtain written permission from the author(s) to use the copyrighted material prior to its use. Reviewed: 7/27/2021 Jenny Wrast Environmental Institute of Houston FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Lakes Field Lab, Data Report Research Design Field Lab, Data Rivers Design Field Lab, Data Report Research Design Field Streams Research Design Field Lab, Data Report Research Design Coastal Report Research Design Field Lab, Data Report Research Wetlands Research Research Research Design Field Lab, Data Report 11 sites in: • Sabine Lake • Galveston Bay • Trinity Bay • West Bay • East Bay • Christmas Bay 26 sites in: • East Matagorda Bay • Tres Palacios Bay • Lavaca Bay • Matagorda Bay • Carancahua Bay • Espiritu Santu Bay • San Antonio Bay • Ayres Bay • Mesquite Bay • Copano Bay • Aransas Bay 16 sites in: • Corpus Christi Bay • Nueces Bay • Upper Laguna Madre • Baffin Bay • East Bay • Alazan Bay •Lower Laguna Madre Finding Boat Launches Tracking Forms Locating the “X” Site Pathogen Indicator Enterococcus Habitat Assessment Water Field Measurements Light Attenuation Basic Water Chemistry Chlorophyll Nutrients Sediment Chemistry and Composition •Grain Size • TOC • Metals Sediment boat and equipment cleaned • PCBs after every site. • Organics Benthic Macroinvertebrates Sediment Toxicity Minimum of 3-Liters of sediment required at each site. Croaker Spot Catfish Whole Fish Sand Trout Contaminants Pinfish •Metals •PCBs •Organics Upper Laguna Madre Hurricanes Hermine & Igor Wind & Rain Upper Laguna Madre Copano Bay San Antonio Bay—August Trinity Bay—July Copano Bay—September Jenny Kristen UHCL-EIH Lynne TCEQ Misty Art Crowe Robin Cypher Anne Rogers Other UHCL-EIH Michele Blair Staff Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Trends of Land Use and Land Cover on Atlantic and Gulf Coast Barrier Islands
    Patterns and Trends of Land Use and Land Cover on Atlantic and Gulf Coast Barrier Islands GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1156 Patterns and Trends of Land Use and Land Cover on Atlantic and Gulf Coast Barrier Islands By Harry F. Lins, Jr. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESS I ON AL PAPER 1156 UNITED STATES GOVERNME-NT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lins, Harry F. Patterns and trends of land use and land cover on Atlantic and Gulf Coast barrier islands. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1156) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1156 1. Coastal zone management-United States. 2. Land use-United States. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 1156. HT392.L55 333.78'4 80-607144 ____________________________ For sale by Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Preface _______________________________ VII References ________________________ ___ 12 Abstract ___________________________________________ 1 Appendices ____________ 13 Introduction ________________________________________ 1 I Tables (9-27) summarize area values of land use and land Methodology ________________________________ 2 cover on Atlantic and Gulf coast barrier islands, Data description and regional analysis ___________________ 2 1945-55 and 1972-75, with changes. Statistical significance ________________________________ 10 II Land use and land cover maps (figs. 2-125) of Atlantic Conclusions _____________________ 11 and Gulf coast barrier islands, 1972-75. TABLES Page Page TABLE 1. Land use and land cover classification system for Area values of Level I land use and land cover on Atlantic and use with remotely sensed data _________________ Gulf Coast barrier islands in 1945-55 and 1972-75, with changes: 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach and Bay Access Guide
    Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    RICE UNIVERSITY Response of the Texas Coast to Global Change: Geologic Versus Historic Timescales By Davin Johannes Wallace A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Doctor of Philosophy APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: John B. Anderson, W. MauriceTiwing Professor in Oceanography Brandon DuganTASsTstant Professor of Earth Science Cin-Ty A. LeefAssociate Professor of Earth Science Carrie A. Masiello, Assistant Professor of Earth Science 'A Philip Bedient, Herman and George R. Brown Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering HOUSTON, TEXAS MAY 2010 UMI Number: 3421388 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3421388 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT Response of the Texas Coast to Global Change: Geologic Versus Historic Timescales by Davin Johannes Wallace The response of coastal systems to global change is currently not well understood. To understand current patterns and predict future trends, we establish a geologic record of coastal change along the Gulf of Mexico coast. A study examining the natural versus anthropogenic mechanisms of erosion reveals several sand sources and sinks along the upper Texas coast.
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    WALLER MONTGOMERY Prairie S 6 2 1 t DISTRICT 8 H 3 MONTGOMERY 4 View w 6 y Tomball y Waller DISTRICT East Fork San w H Jacinto River t StLp 494 Dayton LEE Spring 8 S S China tH Pine Island w Liberty Ames y Nome 7 DISTRICT y S Devers 1 7 w t 3 H H 2 59 w S 1 y y 10 w t LIBERTY H H 9 2 Smithville t 5 4 w 1 S y Hempstead 9 Eastex y w Fwy 3 H 6 Hwy Atascocita DISTRICT S S S t H wy 159 DISTRICT t tH 9 Industry S 5 Lake Houston H 2 w 1 y 110th Congress of the United States w t y S Hw y w 7 tH y w Humble H y 1 w 15 t H 18 1 y 159 9 t on 4 4 S m u 6 JEFFERSON 0 a 3 e 1 y 71 Bellville B 6 w StHwy N y o w tH DISTRICT rt h H S we S t s t S Cedar Creek Reservoir t F Jersey L w p 10 y Village 8 Old River- 6 ( Crosby N Winfree y Aldine La Grange o w Fayetteville r H t t h S y B Hw e nt 4 StHwy 36 o r l eaum 2 WALLER t B e ) 1 v Sheldon i y Lake Charlotte Hw Lost R t Barrett S Lake y t C i e n 5 DISTRICT HARRIS d Mont a ri 9 r B Belvieu T y San Jacinto yu w 7 StHwy 73 H River t Beaumont S Hwy Cloverleaf 1 Winnie Pattison Hilshire 6 Highlands Lake Katy Village y Spring Cove Cotton Lake Anahuac w H StHwy 65 S Channelview t t Valley H S w San Hwy Jacinto Stowell BASTROP y Brookshire 7 1 Felipe Katy Blvd City Hedwig Village Hunters Old Alligator Sealy Fwy Creek River Bayou Anahuac Village Baytown CALDWELL Houston Piney Beach Bunker Hill e Scott Bay Point d Galena i 6 City Village Village West University s 4 Cinco y Park DISTRICT 1 a Dr Bessies Cr ) Place y AUSTIN Ranch y W w w H FAYETTE k 29 t P S Ma Columbus FM n adena Fwy CHAMBERS in o as S P Weimar FM
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Full Final Report Document Printed: 11/1/2018 Document Date: January 21, 2005 2
    1 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST Joni S. Charles, PhD Contracted through the River Systems Institute Texas State University – San Marcos For the National Wildlife Federation February 2005 Commercial Fishing Full Final Report Document Printed: 11/1/2018 Document Date: January 21, 2005 2 Introduction This report focuses on estimating the economic activity specifically associated with commercial fishing in Sabine Lake/Sabine-Neches Estuary, Galveston Bay/Trinity-San Jacinto Estuary, Matagorda Bay/Lavaca-Colorado Estuary, San Antonio Bay/Guadalupe Estuary, Aransas Bay/Mission-Aransas Estuary, Corpus Christi Bay/Nueces Estuary, Baffin Bay/Upper Laguna Madre Estuary, and South Bay/Lower Laguna Madre Estuary. Each bay/estuary area will define a separate geographic region of study comprised of one or more counties. Commercial fishing, therefore, refers to bay (inshore) fishing only. The results show the ex-vessel value of finfish, shellfish and shrimp landings in each of these regions, and the impact this spending had on the economy in terms of earnings, employment and sales output. Estimates of the direct impacts associated with ex-vessel values were produced using IMPLAN, an input-output of the Texas economy developed by the Minnesota IMPLAN Group. The input data was obtained from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) (Culbertson 2004). Commercial fishing impacts are provided in terms of direct expenditure, sales output, income, and employment. These estimates are reported by category of expenditure. A description of IMPLAN is included in Appendix C. Indirect and Induced (Secondary) impacts are generated from the direct impacts calculated by IMPLAN. Indirect impacts represent purchases made by industries from their suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Hurricane History
    Texas Hurricane History David Roth National Weather Service Camp Springs, MD Table of Contents Preface 3 Climatology of Texas Tropical Cyclones 4 List of Texas Hurricanes 8 Tropical Cyclone Records in Texas 11 Hurricanes of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries 12 Hurricanes of the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries 13 Hurricanes of the Late Nineteenth Century 16 The First Indianola Hurricane - 1875 19 Last Indianola Hurricane (1886)- The Storm That Doomed Texas’ Major Port 22 The Great Galveston Hurricane (1900) 27 Hurricanes of the Early Twentieth Century 29 Corpus Christi’s Devastating Hurricane (1919) 35 San Antonio’s Great Flood – 1921 37 Hurricanes of the Late Twentieth Century 45 Hurricanes of the Early Twenty-First Century 65 Acknowledgments 71 Bibliography 72 Preface Every year, about one hundred tropical disturbances roam the open Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico. About fifteen of these become tropical depressions, areas of low pressure with closed wind patterns. Of the fifteen, ten become tropical storms, and six become hurricanes. Every five years, one of the hurricanes will become reach category five status, normally in the western Atlantic or western Caribbean. About every fifty years, one of these extremely intense hurricanes will strike the United States, with disastrous consequences. Texas has seen its share of hurricane activity over the many years it has been inhabited. Nearly five hundred years ago, unlucky Spanish explorers learned firsthand what storms along the coast of the Lone Star State were capable of. Despite these setbacks, Spaniards set down roots across Mexico and Texas and started colonies. Galleons filled with gold and other treasures sank to the bottom of the Gulf, off such locations as Padre and Galveston Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Gulf Shoreline Report Cover2011 Paine
    Texas Gulf Shoreline Change Rates through 2007 Jeffrey G. Paine, Sojan Mathew, and Tiffany Caudle Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director A Report of the Coastal Coordination Jackson School of Geosciences Council Pursuant to National Oceanic The University of Texas at Austin and Atmospheric Administration Austin, Texas 78713-8924 Award No. NA09NOS4190165 Final Report Prepared for General Land Office under contract no. 10-041-000-3737. TEXAS GULF SHORELINE CHANGE RATES THROUGH 2007 by Jeffrey G. Paine, Sojan Mathew, and Tiffany Caudle Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin University Station, Box X Austin, Texas 78713 Corresponding author [email protected] (512) 471-1260 TBPG License No. 3776 A Report of the Coastal Coordination Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA09NOS4190165 Final Report Prepared for the General Land Office under Contract No. 10-041-000-3737. July 2011 CONTENTS Abstract . iv Introduction . 1 Relative Sea Level . 3 Tropical Cyclones . 6 Methods . .8 Sources of Shorelines . 11 Positional Verification . 13 Texas Gulf Shoreline Change through 2007 . 22 Upper Texas Coast (Sabine Pass to San Luis Pass) . 24 Brazos and Colorado Headland (San Luis Pass to Pass Cavallo) . 27 Central Texas Coast (Pass Cavallo to Packery Channel) . 29 Lower Coast (Padre Island) . 31 Conclusions . 34 Acknowledgments . 35 References . 35 FIGURES 1 . Map of the Texas coastal zone . 2 2 . Sea-level trend at Galveston Pleasure Pier, 1908 to 2011 . .6 3. Beach profile and ground GPS survey sites along the Texas Gulf shoreline .
    [Show full text]
  • E,Stuarinc Areas,Tex'asguifcpasl' Liter At'
    I I ,'SedimentationinFluv,ial~Oeltaic \}1. E~tlands ',:'~nd~ E,stuarinc Areas,Tex'asGuIfCpasl' Liter at' . e [ynthesis I Cover illustration depicts the decline of marshes in the Neches River alluvial valley between 1956 and 1978. Loss of emergent vegetation is apparently due to several interactive factors including a reduction of fluvial sediments delivered to the marsh, as well as faulting and subsidence, channelization, and spoil disposal. (From White and others, 1987). SEDIMENTATION IN FLUVIAL-DELTAIC WETLANDS AND ESTUARINE AREAS, TEXAS GULF COAST Uterature Synthesis by William A. White and Thomas R. Calnan Prepared for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Resource Protection Division in accordance with Interagency Contracts (88-89) 0820 and 1423 Bureau of Economic Geology W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713 1990 CONTENTS Introduction . Background and Scope of Study . Texas Bay-Estuary-lagoon Systems................................................................................................. 2 Origin of Texas Estuaries........................................................................................................ 4 General Setting.............................................................................. 6 Climate 10 Salinity 20 Bathymetry..................................... 22 Tides 22 Relative Sea-level Rise.......................................................................................................... 23 Eustatic Sea-level Rise....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(1) Appendix A
    Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(1) Appendix A - Site-specific Uses and Criteria for Classified Segments The following tables identify the water uses and supporting numerical criteria for each of the state's classified segments. The tables are ordered by basin with the segment number and segment name given for each classified segment. Marine segments are those that are specifically titled as "tidal" in the segment name, plus all bays, estuaries and the Gulf of Mexico. The following descriptions denote how each numerical criterion is used subject to the provisions in §307.7 of this title (relating to Site-Specific Uses and Criteria), §307.8 of this title (relating to Application of Standards), and §307.9 of this title (relating to Determination of Standards Attainment). Segments that include reaches that are dominated by springflow are footnoted in this appendix and have critical low-flows calculated according to §307.8(a)(2) of this title. These critical low-flows apply at or downstream of the spring(s) providing the flows. Critical low-flows upstream of these springs may be considerably smaller. Critical low-flows used in conjunction with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality regulatory actions (such as discharge permits) may be adjusted based on the relative location of a discharge to a gauging station. -1 -2 The criteria for Cl (chloride), SO4 (sulfate), and TDS (total dissolved solids) are listed in this appendix as maximum annual averages for the segment. Dissolved oxygen criteria are listed as minimum 24-hour means at any site within the segment. Absolute minima and seasonal criteria are listed in §307.7 of this title unless otherwise specified in this appendix.
    [Show full text]