El Género Paspalum L.(Paspaleae, Poaceae) En La

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

El Género Paspalum L.(Paspaleae, Poaceae) En La Acta Botánica Mexicana ISSN: 0187-7151 [email protected] Instituto de Ecología, A.C. México Ortiz-Díaz, Juan Javier; Arnelas, Itziar; Cerros-Tlatilpa, Rosa; Siqueiros-Delgado, María Elena; Tun-Garrido, Juan EL GÉNERO PASPALUM L. (PASPALEAE, POACEAE) EN LA PENÍNSULA DE YUCATÁN, MÉXICO Acta Botánica Mexicana, núm. 113, 2015, pp. 35-73 Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Pátzcuaro, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57442729003 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Acta Botanica Mexicana 113: 35-73 (2015) EL GÉNERO PASPALUM L. (PASPALEAE, POACEAE) EN LA PENÍNSULA DE YUCATÁN, MÉXICO JUAN JAVIER ORTIZ-DÍAZ1,5, ITZIAR ARNELAS2, ROSA CERROS-TLATILPA3, MARÍA ELENA SIQUEIROS-DELGAdo4 Y JUAN TUN-GARRIdo1 1Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Apdo. postal 4-116, Mérida, Yucatán, México. 2Herbario HUTPL, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Apartado postal 11-01-608, Ecuador. 3Universidad Autónoma de Morelos, Avenida Universidad 1001, Colonia Chamilpa, 62210 Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. 4Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Avenida Universidad 940, 20000 Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México. 5Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] RESUMEN En este estudio se llevó a cabo una sinopsis del género Paspalum L. en la Península de Yucatán, México. Se reconocen 23 especies en el área de estudio, se proporcionan claves de identificación, descripciones morfológicas, mapas de distribución, así como información acerca de su fenología, hábitat y distribución. Se reconocen dos especies endémicas de la Península de Yucatán, P. mayanum y P. sparsum, localizadas en áreas abiertas de la selva baja caducifolia. Palabras clave: Campeche, clave de identificación, endemismo, gramíneas, Quintana Roo, taxonomía, Yucatán. ABSTRACT In this study, a synopsis of Paspalum L. was performed in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Twenty-three taxa are recognized in the study area, identification keys are provided, as well as morphological descriptions, distribution maps, habitat, phenology and distribution data. Two endemic species are recognized for the Yucatan Peninsula, P. mayanum and P. sparsum, which are found in open areas of tropical deciduous forest. 35 Acta Botanica Mexicana 113: 35-73 (2015) Key words: Campeche, identification key, endemism, grasses, Quintana Roo, taxonomy, Yucatán. INTRODUCCIÓN El género Paspalum L. es miembro de la tribu Paspaleae de la familia Poa- ceae. De acuerdo con estudios filogenéticos recientes (Morrone et al., 2012), es uno de los más diversos dentro de la familia Poaceae, con alrededor de 350 especies (Zu- loaga y Morrone, 2005), confinadas a las regiones tropicales y templadas de ambos hemisferios, en especial del hemisferio oeste, siendo particularmente bien repre- sentado en los Cerrados de Brasil (Chase, 1929; Hitchcock, 1971). Paspalum com- prende especies de mayor importancia económica, ya que un gran número de ellas proveen un excelente pasto, como P. dilatatum y P. notatum. Paspalum vaginatum es un buen inmovilizador del suelo en costas arenosas en los trópicos y subtrópicos y P. distichum es usado para proteger suelos de la erosión, por citar algunos casos (Zuloaga y Morrone, 2005). Asimismo, se han registrado especies que ocasionan graves problemas, como por ejemplo la obstrucción de canales de drenaje debido a la presencia de P. repens (Chase, 1929). Morfológicamente las plantas de Paspalum se caracterizan por presentar espiguillas biflosculares plano convexas, siendo ésta probablemente la única sina- pomorfia del género (Rua et al., 2010). Además, las espiguillas generalmente care- cen de la primera gluma y la lema fértil presenta los márgenes enrollados (Chase, 1929; Hitchcock, 1971). Han sido numerosos los trabajos encaminados a esclarecer la clasificación infragenérica de Paspalum (Döll, 1877; Nash, 1912; Chase, 1929; Pilger, 1929; Zuloaga, 1974; Clayton y Renvoize, 1986; Cialdella et al., 1995; Den- ham et al., 2002; Morrone et al., 1995, 1996, 2000, 2004; Rodríguez, 1992, 1998; Zuloaga y Morrone, 2003, 2005; Zuloaga et al., 2004; Denham, 2005; Denham et al., 2010). Sin embargo, no existe un esquema natural de clasificación dentro del mismo (Rua et al., 2010), ya que dichas propuestas se basan en macrocaracteres morfológicos que se presentan en grupos de especies aparentemente poco relacio- nadas (Zuloaga y Morrone, 2005). En el presente trabajo, acorde con los trabajos de Zuloaga et al. (2004), Zuloaga y Morrone (2005), Denham (2005) y Denham et al. (2010), basados en los estudios previos de Nash (1912) y Chase (1929), se re- conocen cuatro subgéneros: subg. Anachyris Chase, subg. Ceresia (Pers.) Rechb., subg. Harpostachys (Trin.) S. Denham y subg. Paspalum, este último con un total de 40 grupos informales. 36 Ortiz-Díaz et al.: Paspalum (Poaceae) en la Península de Yucatán, México En México, Paspalum es el género más diverso de la subfamilia Panicoideae con 85-88 especies (Zuloaga y Morrone, 2003; Dávila et al., 2006; Sánchez-Ken, 2010). En la Península de Yucatán se registran 23 especies (Ortiz-Díaz y Flores Guido, 2008; Carnevali et al., 2010), y aunque esta cantidad ha variado de 14 a 21 en trabajos taxonómicos previos de Paspalum en la región (Swallen, 1934; Pohl y Da- vidse, 1994), sigue siendo el género más diverso de la familia Poaceae en la región. El gran número de especies presentes en la Península de Yucatán está en relación con la diversidad de comunidades vegetales y ambientes tropicales en las que se prospera, encontrándose en selvas, sabanas, manglares y dunas costeras, en sitios abiertos secos o inundados. En virtud de que Paspalum es el género más diversificado de la familia Poa- ceae en la Península de Yucatán y contiene especies ecológicamente importantes como P. plicatulum y P. coryphaeum, se hace necesario actualizar y ampliar la infor- mación taxonómica, ecológica y distribución geográfica en el territorio de estudio. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS El estudio se basó en la revisión de especímenes colectados en campo por el primer autor y en el acervo conservado en los herbarios CICY, F, ITIC, MEXU, MO, UADY, UCAM, US, WIS y XAL. Para la determinación de los ejemplares y para las descripciones se consultaron los trabajos de Chase (1929), Swallen (1934), Pohl y Davidse (1994), Allen y Hall (2003), Zuloaga et al. (2004), Zuloaga y Morrone (2005), Denham (2005) y Denham et al. (2010). Se proporcionan claves para la iden- tificación de los subgéneros y especies. En la sinonimia de las especies, solamente se han considerado aquellos nombres cuyos tipos proceden de México. La información para la distribución de los taxa se ha obtenido de Pohl y Davidse (1994), Dávila et al. (2006), Allen y Hall (2003), Sánchez-Ken (2010), Soreng et al. (2014), y World Chec- klist of Selected Plant Families (WCSP, 2014). Se elaboraron mapas de distribución geográfica y se proporciona información sobre la fenología, hábitat y distribución para todos los taxones de la Península de Yucatán. RESULTADOS El género Paspalum está representado en la Península de Yucatán por 23 es- pecies. El subgénero Anachyris lo está por P. malacophyllum; Harpostachys por P. 37 Acta Botanica Mexicana 113: 35-73 (2015) botterii, y el subgénero Paspalum por las 21 especies restantes correspondientes a 14 grupos informales (grupo Caespitosa: P. blodgettii, P. caespitosum; Conjugata: P. conjugatum; Corcovadensia: P. corcovadense; Dissecta: P. repens; Disticha: P. vaginatum; Fasciculata: P. fasciculatum; Fimbriata: P. fimbriatum; Livida: P. al- calinum; Notata: P. notatum var. notatum; Parviflora: P. clavuliferum; Paniculata: P. mayanum, P. paniculatum, P. sparsum; Plicatula: P. ligulare, P. plicatulum, P. wrightii; Quadrifaria: P. coryphaeum; Virgata: P. arundinaceum, P. millegrana, P. virgatum). En este estudio el subgénero Ceresia no se encuentra representado por ninguna especie. Paspalum L., Syst. Nat., ed. 10, 2: 855. 1759. TIPO (lectotipo designado por Chase, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 24: 137. 1911): Paspalum dimidiatum L., nom. illeg. superfl. = Paspalum dissectum (L.) L. = Ceresia Pers., Syn. Pl. 1: 85. 1805. TIPO: C. elegans Pers. = Reimaria Flüggé, Gram. Monogr., Paspalum: 213. 1810. TIPO: R. candida Flüggé. = Thrasya Kunth., Nov. Gen. Sp. 1: 120-121. 1815 (1816). TIPO: T. paspaloides Kunth. = Paspalanthium Desv., Opusc. Sci. Phys. Nat. 59. 1831. TIPO: P. stoloniferum (Bosc) Desv. = Anachyris Nees, Hooker's J. Bot., Kew Gard. Misc. 2: 103. 1850. TIPO: A. paspa- loides Nees. = Dimorphostachys E. Fourn., Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. 80: 441. 1875. TIPO: D. monostachya (Kunth) E. Fournet. = Tylothrasya Döll, Fl. Bras. 2: 295. 1877. TIPO: T. petrosa (Trin.) Döll. Hierbas anuales o perennes, cespitosas, estoloníferas o rizomatosas. Culmos generalmente erectos, otras veces decumbentes, rastreros o flotantes enraizados, a veces geniculados, simples o ramificados, glabros. Hojas con vainas abiertas, aurí- culas a veces presentes; lígula membranosa, glabra o ciliada con pelos unicelulares; lámina plana, raramente convoluta. Sinflorescencia formada por racimos insertos en un raquis filiforme o alado, 1 o varios, axilares y/o terminales, 1 a numerosos, a veces los racimos se desprenden como una unidad, glabros o pelosos en el punto de inserción. Espiguillas cortamente pedunculadas,
Recommended publications
  • Acta Botanica Brasilica - 35(1): 46-61
    Acta Botanica Brasilica - 35(1): 46-61. January-March 2021. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062020abb0236 Breaking the misconception of a dry and lifeless semiarid region: the diversity and distribution of aquatic flora in wetlands of the Brazilian Northeast Lígia Queiroz Matias1* , Felipe Martins Guedes2 , Hugo Pereira do Nascimento1 and Júlia Caram Sfair1 Received: May 19, 2020 Accepted: November 19, 2020 . ABSTRACT The semiarid region of northeastern Brazil possesses a set of wetlands characterized by hydrographic basins with deficient drainage networks, a few large and permanent lotic systems and several permanent and temporary lagoons. Aquatic plants are widely distributed in these wetlands and the present study aims to determine if those of Ceará state have similar species compositions and differences in species richness. We hypothesized that lentic ecosystems would have more species and different growth forms of aquatic angiosperms than lotic ecosystems. A total of 1619 records of aquatic angiosperms in 43 wetland areas were analysed. The most representative families were Cyperaceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Alismataceae, Malvaceae, Nymphaeaceae and Pontederiaceae. Most of the species are helophytes and bottom-rooted emergent hydrophytes. Permanent lentic ecosystems had the highest number of exclusive species (27.85 %), followed by temporary lentic ecosystems (20.54 %). Contrary to our hypothesis, the different aquatic ecosystems were found to possess distinct species compositions and different proportions of growth forms, and all wetland types contributed to the macrophyte richness of the study area, although they differ in species richness. Therefore, conservation plans for the native aquatic macrophyte biota should include all wetland ecosystems in the semiarid state of Ceará. Keywords: biodiversity, floristic richness, hydrophytes, macrophytes, seasonal aquatic ecosystems significantly during the rainy season according to the stage Introduction of flooding (Ferreira et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrophyte Structure in Lotic-Lentic Habitats from Brazilian Pantanal
    Oecologia Australis 16(4): 782-796, Dezembro 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2012.1604.05 MACROPHYTE STRUCTURE IN LOTIC-LENTIC HABITATS FROM BRAZILIAN PANTANAL Gisele Catian2*, Flávia Maria Leme2, Augusto Francener2, Fábia Silva de Carvalho2, Vitor Simão Galletti3, Arnildo Pott4, Vali Joana Pott4, Edna Scremin-Dias4 & Geraldo Alves Damasceno-Junior4 2Master, Program in Plant Biology, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Center for Biological Sciences and Health, Biology Department. Cidade Universitária, s/no – Caixa Postal: 549 – CEP: 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 3Master, Program in Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Center for Biological Sciences and Health, Biology Department. Cidade Universitária, s/no – Caixa Postal: 549 – CEP: 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 4Lecturer, Program in Plant Biology, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Center for Biological Sciences and Health, Biology Department. Cidade Universitária, s/no – Caixa Postal: 549 – CEP: 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]*, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], arnildo. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The goal of this study was to compare the vegetation structure of macrophytes in an anabranch-lake system. Sampling was carried out at flood in three types of aquatic vegetation, (wild-rice, floating meadow and Polygonum bank) in anabranch Bonfim (lotic) and in lake Mandioré (lentic) in plots along transects, to estimate the percent coverage and record life forms of species. We collected 59 species in 50 genera and 28 families.
    [Show full text]
  • 27April12acquatic Plants
    International Plant Protection Convention Protecting the world’s plant resources from pests 01 2012 ENG Aquatic plants their uses and risks Implementation Review and Support System Support and Review Implementation A review of the global status of aquatic plants Aquatic plants their uses and risks A review of the global status of aquatic plants Ryan M. Wersal, Ph.D. & John D. Madsen, Ph.D. i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of speciic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Ofice of Knowledge Exchange,
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses of Oklahoma
    osu p.llaotten Technical Bulletin No. 3 October, 1938 OKLABOJIA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL ExPERIMENT STATION Lippert S. Ellis, Acting Director GRASSES OF OKLAHOMA By B. I. FEATHERLY Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology Stillwater, Oklahoma Technical Bulletin No. 3 October, 1938 OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Lippert S. Ellis. Acting Director GRASSES OF OI(LAHO~lA By H. I. FEATHERLY Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology Stillwater, Oklahoma ERRATA Page 6, No. 6: For "Leptochlea" read "Leptochloa." Page 10, No. 3 (second line): For "E. colona" read "E. colonum." Page 11, in "Distribution" of Phalaris caroliniana (Walt.): For "Ste-.vens" read "Stevens." Page 23, No. 2b: J:o"'or "Elymus canadensis ar. brachystachys" read "Elymus canadensis var. brachystachys." Page 28: For "Cynodon Dactylon ... etc." read "Cynodon dactylon (I,.) Pers. (Capriola dactylon Kuntz.) Bermuda G1·ass." Page 41, No. 13: For "Aristida divaricata Humb. and Bonnl." read "Aristida divaricata Humb. and Bonpl." Page 65, No. 3: For "Triodia clongata" read "Triodia elongata." Page 67. No. 11 (thud linel: For "ekels" read "keels." Page 71, No. 9 and Fig 81: For "Eragrostis sessilispicata" read "EragTostis sessilispica." Page 84, first line at top of page: For Melica nitens (Nutt.)'' re~d '?tE:cH~·a nH:ens CSc-;:itn.) !-Iutt." Page 106, No. 12, third line of description: For "within white margins" read "with white margins." Page 117. No. 2: l',or "Erianthus ... etc." read "Erianthus alopecuroides (L.) Ell. (E. divaricatus (L.) Hitchc.) Silver Plume-grass." Fage 123, No. 8: For "(A. torreanus Steud.)" read "A. tor­ rey:Jnus Steuc1.)" PREFACE The grass family needs no introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve
    Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve Scientific and Common names obtained from Wunderlin 2013 Scientific Name Common Name Status EPPC FDA IRC FNAI Family: Azollaceae (mosquito fern) Azolla caroliniana mosquito fern native R Family: Blechnaceae (mid-sorus fern) Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern native Woodwardia virginica Virginia chain fern native R Family: Dennstaedtiaceae (cuplet fern) Pteridium aquilinum braken fern native Family: Nephrolepidaceae (sword fern) Nephrolepis cordifolia tuberous sword fern exotic II Nephrolepis exaltata wild Boston fern native Family: Ophioglossaceae (adder's-tongue) Ophioglossum palmatum hand fern native E I G4/S2 Family: Osmundaceae (royal fern) Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern native CE R Osmunda regalis royal fern native CE R Family: Polypodiaceae (polypody) Campyloneurum phyllitidis long strap fern native Phlebodium aureum golden polypody native Pleopeltis polypodioides resurrection fern native Family: Psilotaceae (whisk-fern) Psilotum nudum whisk-fern native Family: Pteridaceae (brake fern) Acrostichum danaeifolium giant leather fern native Pteris vittata China ladder break exotic II Family: Salviniaceae (floating fern) Salvinia minima water spangles exotic I Family: Schizaeaceae (curly-grass) Lygodium japonicum Japanese climbing fern exotic I Lygodium microphyllum small-leaf climbing fern exotic I Family: Thelypteridaceae (marsh fern) Thelypteris interrupta hottentot fern native Thelypteris kunthii widespread maiden fern native Thelypteris palustris var. pubescens marsh fern native R Family: Vittariaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Host Specificity of Ischnodemus Variegatus, an Herbivore of West
    BioControl DOI 10.1007/s10526-008-9188-3 Host specificity of Ischnodemus variegatus, an herbivore of West Indian marsh grass (Hymenachne amplexicaulis) Rodrigo Diaz Æ William A. Overholt Æ James P. Cuda Æ Paul D. Pratt Æ Alison Fox Received: 31 January 2008 / Accepted: 17 July 2008 Ó International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2008 Abstract West Indian marsh grass, Hymenachne to suboptimal hosts occurred in an area where amplexicaulis Rudge (Nees) (Poaceae), is an emer- H. amplexicaulis was growing in poor conditions gent wetland plant that is native to South and Central and there was a high density of I. variegatus. Thus, America as well as portions of the Caribbean, but is laboratory and field studies demonstrate that considered invasive in Florida USA. The neotropical I. variegatus had higher performance on H. amplexi- bug, Ischnodemus variegatus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: caulis compared to any other host, and that suboptimal Lygaeoidea: Blissidae) was observed feeding on hosts could be colonized temporarily. H. amplexicaulis in Florida in 2000. To assess whether this insect could be considered as a specialist Keywords Blissidae Á Hemiptera Á Herbivore biological control agent or potential threat to native performance Á Host quality Á Poaceae and cultivated grasses, the host specificity of I. variegatus was studied under laboratory and field conditions. Developmental host range was examined Introduction on 57 plant species across seven plant families. Complete development was obtained on H. amplexi- West Indian marsh grass, Hymenachne amplexicaulis caulis (23.4% survivorship), Paspalum repens (0.4%), Rudge (Nees) (Poaceae), is a perennial emergent Panicum anceps (2.2%) and Thalia geniculata weed in wetlands of Florida USA and northeastern (0.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296
    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate fungi in plants associated with aquatic environments doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0296 Table S1. Presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and/or dark septate fungi (DSF) in non-flowering plants and angiosperms, according to data from 62 papers. A: arbuscule; V: vesicle; H: intraradical hyphae; % COL: percentage of colonization. MYCORRHIZAL SPECIES AMF STRUCTURES % AMF COL AMF REFERENCES DSF DSF REFERENCES LYCOPODIOPHYTA1 Isoetales Isoetaceae Isoetes coromandelina L. A, V, H 43 38; 39 Isoetes echinospora Durieu A, V, H 1.9-14.5 50 + 50 Isoetes kirkii A. Braun not informed not informed 13 Isoetes lacustris L.* A, V, H 25-50 50; 61 + 50 Lycopodiales Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella inundata (L.) Holub A, V 0-18 22 + 22 MONILOPHYTA2 Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense L. A, V 2-28 15; 19; 52; 60 + 60 Osmundales Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea L. A, V 10 14 Salviniales Marsileaceae Marsilea quadrifolia L.* V, H not informed 19;38 Salviniaceae Azolla pinnata R. Br.* not informed not informed 19 Salvinia cucullata Roxb* not informed 21 4; 19 Salvinia natans Pursh V, H not informed 38 Polipodiales Dryopteridaceae Polystichum lepidocaulon (Hook.) J. Sm. A, V not informed 30 Davalliaceae Davallia mariesii T. Moore ex Baker A not informed 30 Onocleaceae Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. A not informed 30 Onoclea sensibilis L. A, V 10-70 14; 60 + 60 Pteridaceae Acrostichum aureum L. A, V, H 27-69 42; 55 Adiantum pedatum L. A not informed 30 Aleuritopteris argentea (S. G. Gmel) Fée A, V not informed 30 Pteris cretica L. A not informed 30 Pteris multifida Poir.
    [Show full text]
  • Paspalum Spp
    Botânica/Botany Características morfológicas e químicas de lâminas foliares de Paspalum spp. Keila Cortez de Lucena Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Rodovia Dourados‑Itahum, Km 12, CEP: 79804‑970, Dourados, MS, Brasil. E‑mail: [email protected] Gisele Catian Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do sul, Instituto de Biociências, Avenida Costa e Silva, s/n ‑ Cidade Universitária, CEP: 79070‑900, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. E‑mail: [email protected] Beatriz Lempp Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Departamento de Ciências Agrárias, Rodovia Dou‑ rados‑Itahum, Km 12, CEP: 79804‑970, Dourados, MS, Brasil. E‑mail: [email protected] Resumo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o potencial de utilização de lâminas foliares da gramí‑ nea tropical Paspalum spp. para o consumo animal por meio das características morfofisiológicas, da anatomia quantitativa e das características químicas. O experimento foi realizado no período de agosto 1 de 2009 a junho de 2010, no município de Dourados ‑ MS. Foram avaliadas oito espécies de Paspalum spp., sendo as sementes cedidas pela Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. O delineamento experimental utiliza‑ do foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. As médias das características foram agrupadas pelo teste Scott-Knott. Foram evidenciados genótipos com potencial para forrageamento. Paspalum mala- cophyllum destacou-se em relação às características morfofisiológicas, químicas e anatômicas. Para as características anatômicas com proporções de tecidos de maior qualidade, o genótipo Paspalum glau- cescens também se destacou, apresentando altas proporções de mesofilo e bainha parenquimática dos feixes. As avaliações anatômicas de lâminas foliares de Paspalum spp. indicaram importantes diferenças entre os genótipos quanto à proporção e à composição de tecidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Composition of the South-Central Florida Dry Prairie Landscape Steve L
    Floristic Composition of the South-Central Florida Dry Prairie Landscape Steve L. Orzell Avon Park Air Force Range, 29 South Blvd., Avon Park Air Force Range, FL 33825-5700 [email protected] Edwin L. Bridges Botanical and Ecological Consultant, 7752 Holly Tree Place NW, Bremerton, WA 98312-1063 [email protected] ABSTRACT Floristic composition of the Florida dry prairie landscape was compiled from 291 sites in nine south-central peninsular counties. Floristic lists were based upon field inventory and compilation from reliable sources to- taling 11,250 site and community type-specific observations and were analyzed by region (Kissimmee River, Desoto/Glades “Big Prairie,” and Myakka). The known vascular flora consists of 658 vascular plant taxa, rep- resenting 317 genera and 115 families. Families with the highest number of species are Poaceae (103), Asteraceae (78), Cyperaceae (76), Fabaceae (23), Scrophulariaceae (20), and Orchidaceae (18). The most diverse genera are Rhynchospora (29), Dichanthelium (17), Ludwigia (13), Xyris (12), and Andropogon (11). Of this flora 24 taxa are endemic to central or southern peninsular Florida, primarily within the pine savanna- flatwood/dry prairie landscape, and 41 taxa are of Floridian biotic affinity. Although most species are not re- gionally specific, a few (Carphephorus carnosus, Ctenium aromaticum, and Liatris spicata) appear to be ab- sent from the Myakka prairie region, while Marshallia tenuifolia appears to be absent from both the Desoto/ Glades and Myakka prairie regions. Within the dry prairie landscape Hypericum edisonianum is restricted to the Desoto/Glades region. A few other species somewhat differentiate between prairie regions; however, most occur in other habitats in the counties where they are absent or nearly absent from dry prairie.
    [Show full text]
  • Report T-587 Plants of Big Cypress National Preserve: a Preliminary Checklist of Vascular Plants
    Report T-587 Plants of Big Cypress National Preserve: A Preliminary Checklist of Vascular Plants Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, P.O. Box 279, Homestead, Florida 33030 PLANTS OF BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE A Preliminary Checklist of Vascular Plants Report T- 587 David W. Black and Sally Black U.S. National Park Service South Florida Research Center Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida 33030 April 1980 k\,U. URBAN & REG. DOCS. LIBRARY1 This document reprinted in its entirety. Appendix 111: Index of scientific names and Appendix IV: Index of common names has been added in this reprint. August 1983 Black, David W., and Sally Black. 1980. Plants of Big Cypress National Preserve: A Preliminary Checklist of Vascular Plants. South Florida Research Center Report T-587. 28 p. (second printing 55 p.). PLANTS OF BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE A Preliminary Checklist of Vascular Plants David W. Black and Sally Black This list represents the vascular plants known to occur within the boundaries of the Big Cypress National Preserve. It is based primarily on specimens in the herbarium of Everglades National Park, located at the South Florida Research Center. Species which have been seen by the authors within the preserve, but which are not currently represented by herbarium specimens from Big Cypress in the Everglades National Park herbarium, are marked by asterisks. A few species are included that are known from specimens in herbaria other than the one at the park. In such cases the locations of the specimen are indicated on the list. The list presents the following kinds of information: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida Coefficients of Conservatism Values and the Floristic Quality Index for the Vascular Plants of South Florida Steve Mortellaro1, Mike Barry 2, George Gann3, John Zahina4, Sally Channon5, Charles Hilsenbeck6, Douglas Scofield7, George Wilder8 and Gerould Wilhelm9 1U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 2U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Naples, FL (Formerly) 2Institute for Regional Conservation, 22601 S.W. 152 Ave., Miami, FL 33170 (Currently) 3Institute for Regional Conservation, 22601 S.W. 152 Ave., Miami, FL 33170 4 South Florida Water Management District, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 5Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management, 2300 North Jog Rd, 4th Floor, West Palm Beach, FL 33411 6 17516 Birchwood Drive, Boca Raton, FL 33487 7University of California, Los Angeles, 1509 Life Sciences, Box 951786, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1786 8Naples Botanical Garden, 4820 Bayshore Drive, Naples, FL 34112 9Conservation Design Forum, Inc., 375 W. First Street, Elmhurst, IL 60126 January 2009 South Florida Ecological Services Field Office Vero Beach, Florida Table of Contents ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]