Watershed Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watershed Management WatershedDOWNSTREAM ManagementPage 1 Number 22 Beyond the Definition Wa·ter·shed: 1: DIVIDE. 2: A region or area bounded peripherally by a divide and draining ultimately to a particular watercourse or body of water. Man·age: 1: to handle or direct with a degree of skill. 2: to make and keep compliant. 3: to treat with care. 4: to exercise executive, administrative, and supervisory direction. Looking at Webster’s Online Dictionary one can derive a literal definition of “Watershed Management,” but what does it mean in the context of DCR’s Office of Watershed Management? A more graphic explanation of a watershed can start to help: a geographic area of land in which all surface and ground water flows downhill to a common point, such as a river, stream, pond, lake, wetland, or estuary. In other parts of the world, the terms “catchment” or “basin” are also used to describe the lands and waters that drain into a specific body of water. DCR’s Office of This illustration shows an entire watershed system, including Watershed Management rain fall and subsurface activity. It helps demonstrate how land has a legislatively use can have an effect, and be affected by, water quality in a mandated mission to watershed. Illustration: Jim Taylor, DCR staff “protect, preserve and enhance the environment of the Commonwealth and to assure the availability of pure water for future generations.” That translates into DCR managing the drinking source water supplies that the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) treats and distributes to more than 2.5 million people in 51 communities. Photo by; Thom Kyker-Snowman DCR/DWSP Staff WATERSHED - SEE PAGE 4 In This Issue: NUMBER 22 The lead story in this issue pro- Watershed Management 1 Fall 2009 vides an overview of how water How DCR protects a water supply collects in nature and DCR’s efforts The Zebra Mussel 2 to protect its quality for drinking. A threat to Massachusetts waters Other topics covered in this issue Disposal of Unused Pharmaceuticals 3 are the first detection of the Zebra How to keep them out of drinking water Mussel in the state and the rising Reservoir Watch 3 Department of Conservation and awareness for the proper disposal Water supply facts from the summer Recreation of unwanted medicines. The latter Watershed Word Find 7 Division of Water Supply two articles have suggestions on A Kids Corner activity Protection ways everyone can help protect Support Land and Water Conservation 8 www.mass.gov/dcr/ drinking water quality. The new “Tree Plate” watersupply.htm DOWNSTREAM Page 2 Fall 2009 ebra ussels ound in assachusetts recently been on the lake and could Z M F M transport zebra mussels. After a month of Help Stop the Spread of This Notorious Invasive public outreach to increase awareness on zebra mussels and actions people can take to prevent their spread, DFG extended the Laurel Lake boat ramp closure through the end of the 2009 boating season. The closure will provide the state sufficient time to fully implement the range of actions called for in a new Interim Zebra Mussel Action Plan. Keeping zebra mussels out of a water body is crucial because there is no proven method of eradication. Boaters’ diligence to clean, drain, and dry equipment is critical to keeping this invasive species from colonizing other Massachusetts waters. A core component of the Interim Zebra Mussel Action Plan requires self- If you see this sign, PLEASE read it- certification by every user that their boat then heed it! Once the mussels invade a body of water, has not been on Laurel Lake or other out- DCR Archives there is no known way to eradicate them. of-state water bodies known to contain Zebra mussels were first found in the U.S. zebra mussels, or if it has, that the boat This past summer, zebra mussels were near the Great Lakes in 1988 and have has been properly decontaminated. found in Laurel Lake in Lee, the first time since spread to water bodies in about half of all states, including New York, Surveys are underway to gauge the full Dreissena polymorpha had ever been extent of the zebra mussel’s impact in seen in Massachusetts waters. They are Vermont, and Connecticut. Massachusetts lakes currently most at risk Berkshire County. DCR and DFG, in considered among the most significant cooperation with state and local invasive species in the United States, are in Berkshire County’s Hoosic and Housatonic watersheds. stakeholders, are also evaluating the causing major ecological and Interim Zebra Mussel Action Plan to infrastructure damage that costs billions Upon their discovery in Laurel Lake, DCR assess how the current measures are of taxpayer dollars per year to control. implemented the protocols laid out in the working, determine whether The zebra mussel is a freshwater bivalve Rapid Response Plan for Zebra Mussels modifications to the plan are needed, and mollusk that looks like a small clam with developed in 2005 by the agency’s Office update the text and provisions of the plan a yellowish or brownish shell shaped like of Water Resources. DCR notified the to reflect any new and pertinent the letter “D.” Typically an inch or less in Department of Fish and Game’s (DFG) information related to zebra mussels, size, they have been found in numbers as Office of Fishing and Boating Access, including ecology, best management high as 750,000 individuals per square which has authority over state boat practices, laws, regulations, management meter. These mussels out-compete native ramps. DFG closed Laurel Lake’s public measures, and educational materials. mussel species and juvenile fish for access boat ramp on July 8 in order to microscopic plankton, endangering native reduce the risk from boats that had ZEBRA MUSSELS - SEE PAGE 6 species with extinction and upsetting the entire food chain. They attach by the Although small in size, the rate at thousands to virtually everything in a which the Zebra bridge. water body—including docks, boats, Mussel multiplies is Side-scan navigation markers, and even other a major threat to any aquatic organisms. Microscopic juvenile waterbody in which zebra mussels can enter and grow in boat it can flourish. cooling systems, water intakes, monitoring equipment, or other underwater machinery, completely clogging these structures. Their razor- sharp shells wash up on shore, creating a safety hazard for beachgoers as well as producing a foul odor as they decompose. Quabbin Visitors Center DOWNSTREAM Page 3 Number 22 3 Proper Disposal of Unused Pharmaceuticals Reduce water pollution and promote a healthy envi- ronment by properly disposing of unneeded or ex- pired medications reach streams, rivers, and lakes do rescription and over-the-counter P affect wildlife, as medications are a source of pollution fish and wildfowl when they are flushed down the toilet or face continuous drain. Wastewater facilities and septic exposure to the systems are not currently designed to drugs. Medications process pharmaceutical products. thrown Compounds passing through haphazardly in the these systems can impact surface waters, trash can groundwater, and drinking water supplies. also be eaten by Pharmaceuticals can also be released into wildlife that waterways via stormwater run-off from frequent landfills. fields applied with manure or biosolids. Modern technology can detect more Guidelines for Proper Disposal substances, at lower levels, than ever These guidelines are taken from the White Mix the prescription drugs with an before. Fortunately, tests done in the House Office of National Drug Control undesirable substance, like used spring of 2008 detected no compounds in Policy, the Department of Health and coffee grounds or kitty litter, and put Boston’s source drinking water that Human Services, and the Environmental them in impermeable, non-descript comes from the Wachusett and Quabbin Protection Agency: containers, such as empty cans or Reservoirs. According to the American sealable bags, further ensuring that Water Works Association, research has Take unused, unneeded, or expired the drugs are not diverted or not demonstrated an impact on human prescription drugs out of their accidentally ingested by children or health from pharmaceuticals at the very original containers. pets. low levels reported nationally in some Remove ALL personal identification Throw these containers in the trash. drinking water supplies. Studies have or prescription labels from the shown, however, that medicines that container before placing in the trash. PHARMACEUTICALS - SEE PAGE 6 Reservoir Watch - Cleaning the Face of Wachusett Dam MWRA contractors have been busy unsightly, the efflorescence was containment and the water all summer cleaning the face of contaminated with PCBs from the collected and treated. The next Wachusett Dam. The dam face had caulking used on the dam steps are to repoint some areas of an accumulation of efflorescence promenade (see Downstream #21). the face and perform soils resulting from the weeping of Contractors removed the remediation. The fence will come calcium salts in mortar over the last efflorescence with high pressure down soon so DCR maintenance 100 years. In addition to being water. The work was done under crews can groom the grounds. - John Gregoire, MWRA Reservoir Operations Program Manager Reservoir Levels and 6-month Precipitation 2009 System-wide 6-Month Water Usage (March 2009 to August 2009) (Million Gallons Per Day) Reservoir Quabbin Wachusett 250 224.38 Minimum* 529.29’ 388.67’ 204.59 206.48 203.67 Percent Full 98.6% 87.2% 200 184.69 188.16 Date 6/16/09 3/1/09 Wachusett Dam, Before After Maximum* 530.44’ 392.72’ 150 Percent Full 100.9% 95.3% Date 4/7- 4/11/09 7/26/09 100 Precipitation 32.61” 24.91” 50 Seasonal Avg. 25.19” 23.21” *Reservoir Depth in Feet Above Mean Sea Level 0 Data: Matt Walsh, MWRA Project Engineer Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug DOWNSTREAM Page 4 Fall 2009 The DCR Watershed System This map shows the central portion of of the state containing the DCR watershed system.
Recommended publications
  • PM the Massachusetts Historical Commission
    Inventory No: SBR.912 Historic Name: Weston Aqueduct Section 1 Bridge Common Name: MDC Access Road Bridge over Sudbury Reservoir Address: Weston Aqueduct City/Town: Southborough Village/Neighborhood: Fayville Local No: 7-6 Year Constructed: Architect(s): Gill, T. H. and Company Architectural Style(s): Arch Filled Spandrel; Arch Barrel Dressed Voussoir Use(s): Other Engineering; Other Transportation; Utilities Other Significance: Engineering; Transportation SBR.F: Sudbury Dam Historic District Area(s): sbr.i: Water Supply System of Metropolitan Boston Nat'l Register District (1/18/1990); Nat'l Register TRA Designation(s): (1/18/1990) Building Materials(s): The Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) has converted this paper record to digital format as part of ongoing projects to scan records of the Inventory of Historic Assets of the Commonwealth and National Register of Historic Places nominations for Massachusetts. Efforts are ongoing and not all inventory or National Register records related to this resource may be available in digital format at this time. The MACRIS database and scanned files are highly dynamic; new information is added daily and both database records and related scanned files may be updated as new information is incorporated into MHC files. Users should note that there may be a considerable lag time between the receipt of new or updated records by MHC and the appearance of related information in MACRIS. Users should also note that not all source materials for the MACRIS database are made available as scanned images. Users may consult the records, files and maps available in MHC's public research area at its offices at the State Archives Building, 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, open M-F, 9-5.
    [Show full text]
  • WSCAC Status of MWRA Water System Dams
    Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Presentation to WSCAC Status of MWRA Water System Dams John J. Gregoire, Program Manager, Reservoir Operations May 16, 2017 Dams by location and type Dam Name and Location Year Completed Construction/Type Storage (MG) Quabbin Reservoir Winsor Dam, Belchertown 1939 Earthen Embankment 412,000 Goodnough Dike, Ware 1938 Earthen Embankment Quabbin Spillway 1938 Masonry - Gravity Ware River Lonergan Intake Dam, Barre 1931 Masonry - Arch Run of River Wachusett Reservoir Wachusett Reservoir Dam, Clinton 1905 Masonry - Gravity 65,000 North Dike, Clinton 1905 Earthen Embankment South Dike, Clinton 1905 Earthen Embankment Wachusett Aqueduct Open Channel Lower Dam, Southborough 1880s Masonry – Gravity & 8 Earthen Embankment Wachusett Aqueduct Hultman Intake Dam, Marlborough 1940s Earthen Embankment 8 Sudbury Reservoir Sudbury Dam, Southborough 1898 Earthen Embankment 7,200 Foss Reservoir Foss Reservoir Dam, Framingham 1890s Earthen Embankment 1500 Norumbega Reservoir Dams 1, 2, 3, 4 and East Dike, Weston 1940s Earthen Embankment 163 Schenck’s Pond Schenck’s Pond Dam, Weston 1940s Earthen Embankment 43 Weston Reservoir Weston Reservoir Dam, Weston 1903 Earthen Embankment 360 Spot Pond Dams 1, 4 and 5, Stoneham 1899 Earthen Embankment 2,500 Fells Reservoir Dams 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8, Stoneham 1898 Earthen Embankment 63 Chestnut Hill Reservoir Chestnut Hill Dam, Boston 1870 Earthen Embankment 413 2 Dams locations geographically 3 Oroville Dam and Spillway Crisis 4 Oroville Dam, CA •1 TG volume (>2X Quabbin Reservoir)
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Report Supplemental Water Supply
    Town of Ashland Supplemental Water EIR Environmental Impact Report Supplemental Water Supply Town of Ashland September 30, 2015 1 Town of Ashland Supplemental Water EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Brief Project Description .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 Construction Summary .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 List of Permits, licenses, certificates, variances, or approval and the current status on each: .......... 5 1.3 Summary of Alternatives to Project .................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Summary of potential environmental impacts of the project. ........................................................... 6 1.5 List of mitigation measures for the project. ...................................................................................... 6 1.5.1 Erosion control ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.5.2 Temporary Drainage .................................................................................................................. 7 1.5.3 Traffic Mitigation......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
    MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY Fiscal Year 2019 Final CURRENT EXPENSE BUDGET The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Left to right seated: Henry F. Vitale, Paul E. Flanagan, John J. Carroll, Vice-Chairman, Brian Peña Left to right standing: John J. Walsh, Matthew A. Beaton, Chairman, Joseph C. Foti, Jennifer L. Wolowicz, Andrew M. Pappastergion, Secretary, Austin F. Blackmon, Kevin L. Cotter, Fredrick A. Laskey, MWRA Executive Director. Prepared under the direction of Frederick A. Laskey, Executive Director David W. Coppes, Chief Operating Officer Thomas J. Durkin, Director, Finance together with the participation of MWRA staff. Louis M. Taverna, Chairman September 2018 MWRA Advisory Board 100 First Avenue Boston, MA 02129 Dear Chairman Taverna: This letter transmits to the Advisory Board MWRA’s Current Expense Budget (CEB) for Fiscal Year 2019. The CEB was approved by the MWRS’s Board of Directors on June 20, 2018. The FY19 Final Budget recommends a combined assessment increase of 3.07%, which is lower than the 3.8% increase projected for FY19 last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
    Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Wachusett Dam - 100 Years Old
    DOWNSTREAM Page Number 12 Wachusett Dam - 100 Years Old Wachusett Dam then and now. Completed in 1905 at left looking east and today, looking west, holding back 65 billion gallons of water. DCR, New Name, But Our Mission Remains The one hundredth anniversary of the laying of the last stone in the construction of the Unchanged Wachusett Dam will take place on June 24, 2005. The undertaking of a massive public works The Department of Conservation and project can take years and the building of this Recreation (DCR) was created in July 2003 dam, with only the power of man and horse, was when the legislature merged the no exception. The Metropolitan Water Board Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) was formed in 1895 and given broad powers to and the Department of Environmental find the solution for what had become an urgent Management (DEM). Chapter 26 of the problem. The urbanized hub of central New Acts of 2003, s. 290 transferred the England’s commerce had nearly exhausted the responsibilities of the former MDC Division existing water supplies of Spot Pond, the of Watershed Management entirely to the Cochituate Reservoir, and the multi-reservoir Office of Watershed Management within the Sudbury System. This challenge needed quick Division of Water Supply Protection. The resolution; the problem was resolved in a names have changed, but the mission of the relatively timely fashion with world-class Office of Watershed Management remains notoriety. The facts, figures and images in the constant: to provide pure water through following pages tell the story of the ten year responsible land management.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Dislocations in Eastern Massachusetts
    Structural Dislocations in Eastern Massachusetts GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1410 Structural Dislocations in Eastern Massachusetts By ROBERT O. CASTLE, H. ROBERTA DIXON, EDWARD S. GREW, ANDREW GRISCOM, and ISIDORE ZIETZ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1410 A description of the major faults and mylonite zones that form the eastern Massachusetts dislocation belt UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Structural dislocations in eastern Massachusetts. (Geological Survey Bulletin 1410) Bibliography: p. Supt.ofDocs.no.: 119.3:1410 1. Faults (Geology) Massachusetts. 2. Mylonite Massachusetts. I. Castle, Robert O. II. Series: United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1410. QE75.B9 no. 1410 [QE606.5.U6] 557.3'08s [551.8'7] 76-608000 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02852-2 CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 2 Aeromagnetic data...................................................................................................... 5 Major fault systems....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Design and Construction of the Wachusett Dam: Contractor’S Perspective
    Project ID: GFS-2002 The Design and Construction of the Wachusett Dam: Contractor’s Perspective and Contemporary Considerations A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Bachelor of Science By: Emma Fields Rebecca Johnson Julia Saldanha Advised By: Paul Marrone Gillermo Salazar March 25, 2020 Abstract The Wachusett Dam is located in Clinton, Massachusetts, and was constructed beginning in 1895. This project reviews the original construction of the dam as documented in archival photographs and reports. It also develops the construction schedule for the work directly managed by the contractor who took responsibility after October 1, 1901. It then analyzes the productivity of modern plant and equipment supporting construction operations and compares the results with the ones observed more than 100 years ago. The design of the dam’s structure is also reviewed. II Acknowledgments We would like to thank everyone who assisted our team throughout the course of completing our MQP (Major Qualifying Project). We would like to thank our advisors Professor Paul Marrone and Professor Guillermo Salazar for taking their time to guide us week after week with understanding and knowledge. We would also like to thank Professor Mingjiang Tao for his direction and guidance on the capstone design portion of our project. We would like to thank the West Boylston Historic Society for inviting us to present some of the details of our project for its members. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), the Massachusetts Water Resource Authority (MWRA).
    [Show full text]
  • Dcr Properties Listed on the National Register of Historic Places
    DCR PROPERTIES LISTED ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES DIVISION OF STATE PARKS AND RECREATION Northeast Region Southeast Region Ashland State Park Borderland State Park Ashland Dam and Spillway Borderland Historic District Cochituate State Park Cape Cod Rail Trail Lake Cochituate and Dam Brewster Old King's Highway Historic District Old King's Highway Historic District Great Brook Farm State Park George Robbins House Dighton Rock State Park Zebulon Spaulding House Dighton Rock Hopkinton State Park Fort Phoenix State Reservation Hopkinton Reservoir, Dam and Spillway Fort Phoenix Lawrence Heritage State Park Nickerson State Park Bay State Mill Agent's House Brewster Old King's Highway Historic District Bay State Mills Housing Pilgrim Memorial State Park Lowell Heritage State Park Cole’s Hill (NHL) City Hall District National Monument to the Forefathers Locks and Canals National Historic Landmark Plymouth Rock District Lowell National Historic Park Waquoit Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Downtown Lowell Local Historic District Waquoit Historic District Walden Pond State Reservation McCune Site Walden Pond COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS · EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS Department of Conservation and Recreation Deval L. Patrick Ian A. Bowles, Secretary, Executive 251 Causeway Street, Suite 600 Governor Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Boston MA 02114-2119 617-626-1250 617-626-1351 Fax Timothy P. Murray Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Commissioner www.mass.gov/dcr Lt. Governor Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation , Sheet Water Supply System Thematic Nomination 9 7 Section Number ___ Page J ___
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 10244018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Water Supply System of Metropolitan Boston, Themptir Mult.ipTp___________ other names/site number_______Properti es Submi ssi on_________________________________ 2. Location street & number Multiple N/ft I not for publication city, town See District Data Sheet iv ft I vicinity state MA code county code 027, 017, Norfolk. (J2T 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private G3 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing fXI public-local f"Xi district buildings I I public-State I [site __ ____ sites I I public-Federal r~Xl structure Qfi A structures I I object . objects .Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register >ee Continuation Sheet 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this H nomination l_j request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterworks System Improvements Integrated Water Supply Improvement Program
    Waterworks System Improvements Integrated Water Supply Improvement Program MWRA’s Integrated Water Supply Improvement Program is a 10-year, $1.7 billion initiative consisting of a series of projects to protect reservoir watersheds, build new water treatment and transmission facilities, and upgrade distribution storage and MWRA and community pipelines. The program improves each aspect of the water system from the watersheds to the consumer to ensure that high quality water reliably reaches to MWRA customers’ taps. The program began in 1995 and the principle components have been completed by 2005. The main program components are as follows: Watershed Protection The watershed areas around Quabbin and Wachusett Reservoirs are pristine areas with 85% of the land covered in forest or wetlands and about 75% protected from development by direct ownership or development restrictions. MWRA works in partnership with the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) to manage and protect the watersheds. MWRA also finances all the operating and capital expenses for the watershed activities of DCR, including CIP funding for a completed sewer project and on-going land acquisition activities. MetroWest Water Supply Tunnel The 17-mile-long 14-foot diameter tunnel connects the new John J. Carroll Water Treatment Plant at Walnut Hill in Marlborough to the greater Boston area. It is now the main transmission line moving water into the metropolitan Boston area. Once inspection, repairs and interconnections are complete, the old Hultman Aqueduct will be used in parallel as the back-up transmission link. Construction began on the tunnel in 1986 and the completed tunnel placed in service in October 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Water Supply Commission
    Public Document No» 147 ^ASS. ©I|^ (Unmmnnmtultli nf MtxmutiinstttB DOCS. :OLL. ! ANNUAL REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION FOR THE Year Ending November 30, 1938 Publication of this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance Im-l-MO. D-1S23. REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION To the Honorable the Senate and House of Representatives of the Common- zuealth of Massachusetts in General Court Assembled. The Metropolitan District Water Supply Commission, established under the provisions of Chapter 375 of the Acts of 1926, respectfully presents for the year ending November 30, 1938 its THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT I. Organization and Administration Eugene C. Hultman continued as Chairman of the Commission and Thomas D. Lavelle and Edward J. Kelley as Associate Commissioners. R. Nelson Molt continued as Secretary. During the past year the Administrative functions of the Commission have been greatly increased by new construction work authorized by Chapter 460 as amended by Chapter 501 of the Acts of 1938. This new construction was made possible because of the saving by the Com- mission estimated from $12,000,000.00 to $14,0000,000.00 from the appropriation of $65,000,000.00 authorized in 1926 and 1927 by the Legislature and these Acts were passed after consideration of the special report which, prepared under Chapter 48, Resolves of 1936, by a joint board consisting of this Commis- sion and the Department of Public Health relative to improvements in distribu- tion and to adequate prevention of pollution of sources of water supply of the Metropolitan water district and printed as House document No.
    [Show full text]