DOCSLIB.ORG

GMSA Overview 2016 V2.Cdr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

South Africa Overview Enter CONTENTS 2 GM SOUTH AFRICA: HISTORICAL TIMELINE 4 GM FACILITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA 5 VEHICLES ASSEMBLED 6 DEALER NETWORK COVERAGE: Market Size 7 OUR BRANDS 8 GM SOUTH AFRICA CURRENT PORTFOLIO 9 SALES 10 GM SUB-SAHARAN DISTRIBUTION NETWORK & BRANDS 11 COMPONENT EXPORTS 12 AWARDS 14 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 15 EMPLOYEE VOLUNTEERISM 16 GMSA CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION 17 GM SOUTH AFRICA FOUNDATION 1 General Motors South Africa Overview Next GM SOUTH AFRICA: HISTORICAL TIMELINE 1913 General Motors begins distributing vehicles in South Africa 1920s 1926 Commenced production operations in South Africa (Darling Street) Chevrolet, Oakland, GMC, Buick, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Vauxhall 1928 Assembly commences at Kempston Road plant 1930s Brands added: Cadillac, Bedford trucks and Opel 1950s Frigidaire Stoves and refrigerators begin production 1965 Engines assembly plant opened 1972 Isuzu pickup introduced – during 1970s the Chev Commercial branding is replaced by Isuzu 1986 GM divests from South Africa – Delta Motor Corporation is formed Subsidiary company (Precision Exhaust) wins 1st of 7 1991 GM Supplier of the Year awards for catalytic converters 2 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next GM SOUTH AFRICA: Historical Timeline continued 1995 Delta becomes highest volume exporter of pickups to Africa 1996 Struandale Assembly Plant production begins 1997 GM purchases a 49% interest in Delta Motor Corporation 2003 Chevrolet brand returns to South Africa 2004 GM purchases remaining 51% - company name reverts to GM South Africa We have built 2006 HUMMER H3 production commences – both domestic and export markets 2.76 2008 New Vehicle Conversion and Distribution Centre opens 2010 New Parts Distribution Centre opens million 2013 GM Africa region established (incorporating production vehicles since operations in Kenya, Egypt and South Africa) 2015 The 250 000th Chevrolet Utility rolled off the production line at the Struandale plant in Port Elizabeth. - GMSA contributed 2.76 million vehicles built to the 1926 global total of 500 million vehicles 3 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next GM FACILITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA OWNED • Struandale Site LEASED • Kempston Road site Vehicle Sales, Service and • Parts Distribution Centre Marketing Offices • Vehicle Sales, Service and Marketing offices - Johannesburg WN TO UITENHAGE O GRAHAMS Parts T Distribution Vehicle Centre Conversion & Distribution COEGA RIVER Centre ZWARTSKOP RIVER Strunadale TO CAPE TOWN Plant Kempston Road 5km 10km 15km 20km 25km Plant PE HARBOUR ALGOA BAY PORT ELIZABETH 4 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next VEHICLES ASSEMBLED Chevrolet Utility (sub-one ton pick-up) Chevrolet Spark Isuzu pick-up (one-ton pick-up) Isuzu trucks (as part of a 70/30 joint venture with Isuzu Motors of Japan) 5 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next DEALER NETWORK COVERAGE: Market Size LEGEND Chevrolet/Opel/Isuzu - 134 Botswana/ Swaziland Gauteng Limpopo Namibia North West Province Mpumalanga Free State KwaZulu-Natal Northern Cape Eastern Cape Western Cape 6 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next OUR BRANDS All our brands are equally important and each plays a specific role in our overall portfolio Chevrolet Our global brand that forms the cornerstone of the GM passenger car portfolio and will evolve in line with the global strategy under the Find New Roads campaign. Opel Opel has a strong heritage in South Africa with its products been sold in this market since the 1930s. The brand represents excitement innovation, design and drive. Isuzu Our commercially focused brand, manufactured locally, engineered locally with untapped potential for both domestic & export growth. 7 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next GM SOUTH AFRICA CURRENT PORTFOLIO OPEL Corsa Hatch Astra Hatch Astra OPC Astra Sedan Opel ADAM Opel Mokka CHEVROLET Spark Lite Spark Aveo Sedan Sonic RS Sonic Sedan Sonic Hatch Cruze Sedan Cruze Hatch Captiva Trailblazer Chevrolet Commercial Orlando Utility Pickup ISUZU Isuzu Trucks Isuzu KB Series Isuzu N, F , C & E Series 8 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next SALES GM Volume GM Share 2015 61 624 9.5% • In 2015 Isuzu pick-up sales volumes increased by 5% • In 2015 Utility sales volumes increased by 3% • 18.9% of the overall LCV market in 2015 • Our top selling products in 2015 included the Chev Utility, Isuzu KB and Chev Spark • In 2015 Opel sales volumes increased by 74% vs 2014 9 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next GM SUB-SAHARAN DISTRIBUTION NETWORK & BRANDS LEGEND Chevrolet / Isuzu Opel Tunisia No GM Distribution Morocco Algeria Western Sahara Libya Egypt Cape Verde Mauritania Mali Senegal Niger Gambia Chad Sudan Eritrea Guinea-Bissau Burkina Faso Djibouti Guinea Sierra Leone Nigeria Ethiopia Liberia oon C.A.R. Benin Ivory Coast amer Ghana C Togo Equatorial Guinea Somalia ongo Kenya C Uganda Gabon Dem. Rep. Congo Rwanda For the first time in the history Burundi of GM South Africa we are assembling Tanzania Isuzu pick-ups in both left and right Angola Malawi hand drive. We have established a strong base in South Africa from which Zambia to expand and grow our sales volumes Zimbabwe Mozambique in the medium to long term in key Namibia Botswana Madagascar Sub-Saharan Africa markets. Reunion Island Mauritius Coverage in place for all significant Swaziland volume markets in SSA. South Africa Lesotho 10 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next COMPONENT EXPORTS Through GM South Africa’s supplier base the company exports catalytic convertors, stainless steel exhaust components. (Catalytic convertors account for 95% of component exports business) Key markets include United States, Mexico, South America, Europe, South Korea and China. GM South Africa facilitates the export of nearly 3 million catalytic converters per year which accounts for 27% of total catalytic converter export revenue. 11 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next AWARDS In the 2015 IPSOS Quality Awards GM South Africa won 10 awards: - Best Volume Passenger brand: Opel & Chevrolet with Silver - Best local manufacturing plant: Chevrolet with Silver - Best overall LCV brand: Chevrolet with Silver and Isuzu with Bronze - Best 1 ton double cab: Isuzu with Bronze - Best 1 ton single cab: Isuzu with Silver - Best small hatch: Corsa with Silver and Sonic with Bronze - Best Small Sedan: Sonic with Gold and Aveo with Silver - Best Top Sedan: Cruze with Silver - Best ¾ ton: Chev Utility with Gold - Best Diesel Single Cab: Isuzu In Car Magazine’s Top 12 Best Buys for 2015, Chevrolet Spark won the Best Budget Car category for the second consecutive year. Opel won the category of Company to watch out for. The Chevrolet Trailblazer was named Best Value SUV. Orchid Award: The new Chevrolet Cruze advertisement won an Orchid Award, awarded by the Star, the newspaper with the biggest circulation in South Africa. Govan Mbeki Award: Fairview Links was awarded the Best Social Housing project in the country. This brings the GM Foundation’s total awards tally since 1995 to 24 for its housing and education initiatives. AWARDS Continued 12 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next AWARDS Continued Exporter of the Year Awards: GM South Africa won the Environmental category for the Eastern Cape. This is in recognition of the company’s efforts to cut down on waste and pollutants and to recycle material from its daily operations. Women on Wheels Awards: Opel ADAM won for the best hatchback, while Opel Mokka won the MPV’s category. Best of the Best Award: The new Opel Corsa won the Best of the Best Award in the Best Budget Buy segment by South Africa’s biggest newspaper, The Star. Health and Wellness Awards: GMSA emerged victorious at the 7th annual Nelson Mandela Bay Business Health and Wellness Awards. GMSA won in the category Corporate Social Investment and Community Support for the Machiu Primary School Arts project, as well as the overall Wellness Champion for an employee’s involvement with the Friends of Paterson Trust. Opel ADAM and Opel Corsa have been shortlisted as Car of the Year finalists. 13 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - 2015 GMSA’s corporate social responsibility has a strong focus on improving the status of education and youth development in the country. 60 000 One World Futbols to development soccer. 7200 learners benefit from soccer development. 20 000 Lapdesks since 2011 2 000 Career handbooks in 2015 14 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next EMPLOYEE VOLUNTEERISM Winter Woolly Campaign GMSA boosted the Winter Woolly Week project with a cash donation of R150 000. Employees also collected money at traffic intersections and donated food, clothing and blankets. 67 Minutes for Madiba 180 employees packed a total of 20 088 meals for Madiba Day Employees get involved with adopted schools 15 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next GMSA CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION For every vehicle sold in South Africa, GMSA, its network of 134 dealers and GMSA Financial Services contribute to the GM Childlife Foundation. Since its inception in 2010 the Foundation invested more than R15 million in 61 projects, touching the lives of more than 223 000 underprivileged children across South Africa. Dealers have the freedom to select projects relevant to the specific needs of their local communities. Project include feeding schemes, school transport, building and renovations, and other practical assistance to schools, day care centres and after care centres. More than R15 million spent since 2010 61 child-focused projects across South Africa Impacted more than 223 000 children 16 General Motors South Africa Overview Previous Contents Next GM SOUTH AFRICA FOUNDATION The GM South Africa Foundation is the primary driver of the company’s community development activities and has a proven track record in partnering with Government and other development and education organisations to facilitate effective delivery on two of South Africa’s most critical challenges – public schooling and State-subsidised housing.
Recommended publications
  • Hummer Versus Prius “Dust to Dust” Report Misleads the Media and Public with Bad Science

    Hummer Versus Prius “Dust to Dust” Report Misleads the Media and Public with Bad Science

    Hummer versus Prius “Dust to Dust” Report Misleads the Media and Public with Bad Science Dr. Peter H. Gleick Pacific Institute May 2007 Abstract The CNW Marketing Research, Inc.’s 2007 “Dust to Dust: The Energy Cost of New Vehicles From Concept to Disposal” caught the interest of the media and the public with its claim that a Hummer H3 SUV has a lower life-cycle energy cost than a Toyota Prius hybrid. Closer inspection suggests that the report’s conclusions rely on faulty methods of analysis, untenable assumptions, selective use and presentation of data, and a complete lack of peer review. Even the most cursory look reveals serious biases and flaws: the average Hummer H1 is assumed to travel 379,000 miles and last for 35 years, while the average Prius is assumed to last only 109,000 miles over less than 12 years. These selective and unsupported assumptions distort the final results. A quick re-analysis with peer-reviewed data leads to completely opposite conclusions: the life-cycle energy requirements of hybrids and smaller cars are far lower than Hummers and other large SUVs. CNW should either release its full report, including methods, assumptions, and data, or the public should ignore its conclusions. Unfortunately, “Dust to Dust” has already distorted the public debate. Introduction In March 2007, an automotive marketing company CNW Marketing Research, Inc. (CNW) announced the release of a private study on the comparative life-cycle energy costs of a wide range of automobiles.1 The public version of the report2 included a remarkable conclusion: counting all lifetime energy inputs, the massive Hummer H1, H2, and H3 sport utility vehicles (and many other large SUVs) use less energy per mile driven than the highly touted Toyota Prius hybrid (and many other smaller vehicles).
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : in Re : Chapter 11 Case No

    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : in Re : Chapter 11 Case No

    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., : 09-50026 (REG) f/k/a General Motors Corp., et al. : : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : ---------------------------------------------------------------x DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR DEBTORS’ AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212) 310-8000 Attorneys for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession Dated: New York, New York December 8, 2010 THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN. ACCEPTANCES OR REJECTIONS MAY NOT BE SOLICITED UNTIL A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BUT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO DATE. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 A. Definitions and Exhibits............................................................................ 1 1. Definitions...................................................................................... 1 2. Exhibits .......................................................................................... 1 B. Notice to Creditors..................................................................................... 1 1. Scope of Plan ................................................................................. 1
  • Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles

    Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles

    National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center BULLETIN A Program of the National Institute of Justice December 2002 Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles atrol vehicles are among the most results to State and local law enforcement critical purchases that a law enforce- agencies, NIJ helps these agencies select vehi- P ment agency makes. For both large cles that maximize their budgets and ensures and small agencies, patrol vehicle purchases that evaluated vehicles provide reliable and frequently represent the second largest ex- safe performance under the increased penditure, after personnel, in their annual demands of police service. operating budgets. Selecting a vehicle that The 2003 model year patrol vehicles were balances both budgetary and performance evaluated from September 21 through 23, requirements has become an increasingly 2002. For the purposes of the MSP evalua- challenging task for police fleet administra- tion, police-package vehicles are those that tors. Many agencies are painfully aware of are designed and manufactured for use in the consequences that result from being the full spectrum of law enforcement patrol “penny wise and pound foolish,” where service, including pursuits. A special-service vehicles with inadequate performance, such vehicle is a vehicle that may be used by law as regular production passenger vehicles not enforcement agencies for specialized use specifically designed for police service, are (e.g., off-road, inclement weather, K–9, or selected because they cost less than police- commercial vehicle enforcement), but is not package vehicles. Although some agencies designed or manufactured to be used in high have had limited success with nontraditional speed or pursuit situations.
  • The Motor Vehicle Assembly and Component Sector Anthony Black

    The Motor Vehicle Assembly and Component Sector Anthony Black

    An Industrial Strategy for the Motor Vehicle Assembly and Component Sector Anthony Black ARCHIV 113599 jy Project IDRO - Li1. AN INDUSTRIAL S TRA TEGY FOR THE MOTOR VEHICLE ASSEMBLY AND COMPONENTSECTORS Anthony Black Industrial Strategy Project Development Policy Research Unit School of Economics University of Cape Town 1994 I UCT] rNEsJ / UCT Press(Pty) Ltd Universityof Cape Town PrivateBag Rondebosch 7700 SouthAfrica All rights are reserved.No part of this publicationmay be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmittedin any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, icording or otherwise, without priorpermission of thepublisher. Cover illustration: Taken from Gavin Young's sculpture, "Hoerrikwagga", standing near JamesonHall on the University of Cape Towncampus. Typesetting: Hayley Viljoen Coverdesign: KarrenVisser Printed and bound by CredaPress Copyright: IndustrialStrategy Project First published: 1994 ISBN: 0-7992-1575-9 EDITORIAL COMMENT This report is one ofa seriesproduced by the Industrial StrategyProject. The ISP has its origins in the Economic Trends Research Group, a collective of economists and other social scientists convenedby the Congress of South African Trade Unions in 1986. COSATU, under attack for its support for sanctions, initially asked these researchers to examinethe impact ofenforced isolation on the South African economy. It soon became clear that sanctions were a small aspect of the problems besetting the South African economy, and the work of the Economic Trends Research Group expanded into a full-blown analysis of South Africa's economiccrisis. The poor performance of South Africa's manufacturing sector loomed large in the litany of problems bedeviling the South African economy. The 1980s had been, in economic terms, something of a lost decade.
  • 2010 HUMMER H3/H3T Owner Manual M

    2010 HUMMER H3/H3T Owner Manual M

    2010 HUMMER H3/H3T Owner Manual M In Brief . 1-1 Storage . 4-1 Driving and Operating . 9-1 Instrument Panel . 1-2 Storage Compartments . 4-1 Driving Information . 9-2 Initial Drive Information . 1-3 Additional Storage Features . 4-2 Starting and Operating . 9-33 Vehicle Features . 1-13 Roof Rack System . 4-4 Engine Exhaust . 9-40 Performance and Automatic Transmission . 9-41 Maintenance . 1-16 Instruments and Controls . 5-1 Manual Transmission . 9-44 Controls . 5-2 Drive Systems . 9-46 Keys, Doors and Windows . 2-1 Warning Lights, Gauges, and Brakes . 9-50 Keys and Locks . 2-2 Indicators . 5-6 Ride Control Systems . 9-52 Doors . 2-7 Information Displays . 5-18 Cruise Control . 9-57 Vehicle Security. 2-9 Vehicle Messages . 5-21 Object Detection Systems . 9-60 Exterior Mirrors . 2-13 Universal Remote System . 5-26 Fuel . 9-64 Interior Mirrors . 2-14 Lighting . 6-1 Towing. 9-70 Windows . 2-15 Conversions and Add-Ons . 9-81 Roof . 2-17 Exterior Lighting . 6-1 Interior Lighting . 6-7 Vehicle Care . 10-1 Seats and Restraints . 3-1 Lighting Features . 6-8 General Information . 10-2 Head Restraints . 3-2 Infotainment System . 7-1 Vehicle Checks . 10-4 Front Seats . 3-3 Headlamp Aiming . 10-33 Rear Seats . 3-7 Introduction . 7-1 Radio . 7-5 Bulb Replacement . 10-35 Safety Belts . 3-10 Electrical System . 10-38 Airbag System . 3-27 Audio Players . 7-10 Phone . 7-15 Wheels and Tires . 10-44 Child Restraints . 3-42 Jump Starting . 10-86 Climate Controls .
  • The Ohio Motor Vehicle Industry

    The Ohio Motor Vehicle Industry

    Research Office A State Affiliate of the U.S. Census Bureau The Ohio Motor Vehicle Report February 2019 Intentionally blank THE OHIO MOTOR VEHICLE INDUSTRY FEBRUARY 2019 B1002: Don Larrick, Principal Analyst Office of Research, Ohio Development Services Agency PO Box 1001, Columbus, Oh. 43216-1001 Production Support: Steven Kelley, Editor; Jim Kell, Contributor Robert Schmidley, GIS Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1 Description of Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry 4 The Motor Vehicle Industry’s Impact on Ohio’s Economy 5 Ohio’s Strategic Position in Motor Vehicle Assembly 7 Notable Motor Vehicle Industry Manufacturers in Ohio 10 Recent Expansion and Attraction Announcements 16 The Concentration of the Industry in Ohio: Gross Domestic Product and Value-Added 18 Company Summaries of Light Vehicle Production in Ohio 20 Parts Suppliers 24 The Composition of Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry – Employment at the Plants 28 Industry Wages 30 The Distribution of Industry Establishments Across Ohio 32 The Distribution of Industry Employment Across Ohio 34 Foreign Investment in Ohio 35 Trends 40 Employment 42 i Gross Domestic Product 44 Value-Added by Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry 46 Light Vehicle Production in Ohio and the U.S. 48 Capital Expenditures for Ohio’s Motor Vehicle Industry 50 Establishments 52 Output, Employment and Productivity 54 U.S. Industry Analysis and Outlook 56 Market Share Trends 58 Trade Balances 62 Industry Operations and Recent Trends 65 Technologies for Production Processes and Vehicles 69 The Transportation Research Center 75 The Near- and Longer-Term Outlooks 78 About the Bodies-and-Trailers Group 82 Assembler Profiles 84 Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV 86 Ford Motor Co.
  • Vehicle Brands and Manufacturers • 12/2014

    Vehicle Brands and Manufacturers • 12/2014

    Vehicle Brands and Manufacturers • 12/2014 Vehicle Brand Manufactured by Website Customer Service Acura Honda www.acura.com 800-382-2238 Canada www.acura.ca 888-922-8729 Alfa Romeo Dodge www.4c.alfaromeo.com 800-253-2872 Canada www.4c.alfaromeo.com/en_ca E: 800-465-2001 F: 800-387-9983 Audi Volkswagen www.audiusa.com 800-822-2834 Canada www.audi.ca 800-822-2834 BMW BMW www.bmwusa.com 800-831-1117 Canada www.bmw.ca 800-567-2691 Buick General Motors www.buick.com 800-521-7300 Cadillac General Motors www.cadillac.com 800-458-8006 Canada www.cadillac.com 800-263-3777 Chevrolet/GEO General Motors www.chevrolet.com 800-222-1020 Canada www.chevrolet.com 800-263-3777 Chrysler Chrysler www.chrysler.com 800-247-9753 Canada www.chrysler.ca E: 800-465-2001 F: 800-387-9983 Daewoo Daewoo www.daewoous.com 877-362-1234 Dodge Chrysler www.dodge.com 800-423-6343 Canada www.chrysler.ca E: 800-465-2001 F: 800-387-9983 Eagle Chrysler www.chrysler.com 800-247-9753 Canada www.chrysler.ca E: 800-465-2001 F: 800-387-9983 Ferrari Ferrari www.ferrariusa.com 201-816-2600 or www.ferrariworld.com Fiat Chrysler www.fiatusa.com/en 888-242-6342 Canada www.fiatcanada.com E: 800-465-2001 F: 800-387-9983 Ford Ford www.ford.com 800-392-3673 Canada www.ford.ca 800-565-3673 Geo General Motors (see Chevrolet) GMC General Motors www.gmc.com 800-462-8782 Canada www.gmc.com 800-263-3777 Honda Honda www.honda.com 800-999-1009 Canada www.honda.ca 888-946-6329 Hummer General Motors www.hummer.com 800-732-5493 Canada www.hummer.com 800-263-3777 Hyundai Hyundai www.hyundaiusa.com 800-633-5151
  • Vehicle Make, Vehicle Model

    Vehicle Make, Vehicle Model

    V8, V9 VEHICLE MAKE, VEHICLE MODEL Format: VEHICLE MAKE – 2 numeric VEHICLE MODEL – 3 numeric Element Values: MAKE: Blanks 01-03, 06-10, 12-14, 18-25, 29-65, 69-77, 80-89, 90-94, 98-99 MODEL: Blanks 001-999 Remarks: SEE REMARKS UNDER VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER – V12 2009 181 ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF MAKES FARS MAKE MAKE/ NCIC FARS MAKE MAKE/ NCIC MAKE MODEL CODE* MAKE MODEL CODE* CODE TABLE CODE TABLE PAGE # PAGE # 54 Acura 187 (ACUR) 71 Ducati 253 (DUCA) 31 Alfa Romeo 187 (ALFA) 10 Eagle 205 (EGIL) 03 AM General 188 (AMGN) 91 Eagle Coach 267 01 American Motors 189 (AMER) 29-398 Excaliber 250 (EXCL) 69-031 Aston Martin 250 (ASTO) 69-035 Ferrari 251 (FERR) 32 Audi 190 (AUDI) 36 Fiat 205 (FIAT) 33 Austin/Austin 191 (AUST) 12 Ford 206 (FORD) Healey 82 Freightliner 259 (FRHT) 29-001 Avanti 250 (AVTI) 83 FWD 260 (FWD) 98-802 Auto-Union-DKW 269 (AUTU) 69-398 Gazelle 252 (GZL) 69-042 Bentley 251 (BENT) 92 Gillig 268 69-052 Bertone 251 (BERO) 23 GMC 210 (GMC) 90 Bluebird 267 (BLUI) 25 Grumman 212 (GRUM) 34 BMW 191 (BMW) 72 Harley- 253 (HD) 69-032 Bricklin 250 (BRIC) Davidson 80 Brockway 257 (BROC) 69-036 Hillman 251 (HILL) 70 BSA 253 (BSA) 98-806 Hino 270 (HINO) 18 Buick 193 (BUIC) 37 Honda 213 (HOND) 19 Cadillac 194 (CADI) 29-398 Hudson 250 (HUDS) 98-903 Carpenter 270 55 Hyundai 215 (HYUN) 29-002 Checker 250 (CHEC) 08 Imperial 216 (CHRY) 20 Chevrolet 195 (CHEV) 58 Infiniti 216 (INFI) 06 Chrysler 199 (CHRY) 84 International 261 (INTL) 69-033 Citroen 250 (CITR) Harvester 98-904 Collins Bus 270 38 Isuzu 217 (ISU ) 64 Daewoo 201 (DAEW) 88 Iveco/Magirus
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X in Re: for PUBLICATION

    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X in Re: for PUBLICATION

    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x In re: FOR PUBLICATION MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f/k/a Chapter 11 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 09-50026 (MG) (Jointly Administered) Debtors. -----------------------------------------------------------------------x MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY AVOIDANCE ACTION TRUST, by and through the Wilmington Trust Company, solely in its capacity as Trust Administrator and Trustee, Adversary Proceeding Plaintiff, Case No. 09-00504 (MG) against JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------------x MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING FIXTURE CLASSIFICATION AND VALUATION A P P E A R A N C E S: WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claim Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 51 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 By: Harold S. Novikoff, Esq. Marc Wolinsky, Esq. Amy R. Wolf, Esq. Emil A. Kleinhaus, Esq. Carrie M. Reilly, Esq. C. Lee Wilson, Esq. -and- KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, New York 10178 By: John M. Callagy, Esq. Nicholas J. Panarella, Esq. BINDER & SCHWARTZ LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 28 W. 44th Street, Suite 700 New York, New York 10036-4039 By: Eric B. Fisher, Esq. Neil S. Binder, Esq. Lindsay A. Bush, Esq. Lauren K. Handelsman, Esq. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................
  • D-231-44.Pdf

    D-231-44.Pdf

    State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D-231-44 Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156 of the California Vehicle Code Whipple Industries, Inc. Whipple Supercharger Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Section 39515 and Section 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G-14-012; IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the installation of the Whipple Supercharger, manufactured and marketed by Whipple Industries, Inc., 3292 N. Weber, Fresno California 93722, has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of the applicable vehicle pollution control systems and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for the following General Motors vehicles listed in Exhibit A The Whipple Supercharger consists of the following main components: A 2.3L or a 2.9L displacement twin screw supercharger, intake manifold, bypass valve, high flow injectors, intercooler, reflashed ECM, air inlet tubing, and an electronic fuel pump booster. Boost is limited to 11 pounds per square inch. The stock crankshaft pulley, throttlebody, thermostat, air filter housing (except 1999 to 2003 model year trucks), and mass air flow sensor are retained. Modifications may be made to the stock air intake system that is before the stock air filter box. All supplied fuel hoses are either Avon's CADbar 9000 series or a stock factory replacement, and fuel and vapor line connectors supplied with the kit are OEM equivalent parts. Breather hoses may be replaced with an SAE30R9 rated hose.
  • 2024 GMC HUMMER EV SUV Offers New Tactical Tech

    2024 GMC HUMMER EV SUV Offers New Tactical Tech

    News 2024 GMC HUMMER EV SUV Offers New Tactical Tech OSHAWA, Ont. (Monday, April 5, 2021) – GMC’s electric supertruck lineup expands with the addition of the 2024 HUMMER EV SUV — and it is loaded with smart, purposeful technology. “GMC’s HUMMER EV SUV offers an exceptional balance of on-road performance and off-road capability, enhanced by a unique structure that allows for our signature open-air experience,” said Al Oppenheiser, HUMMER EV chief engineer. “New features debuting on the SUV reinforce its role as a tactical tool in almost any situation.” New available Power Station generator2 that enables customers to utilize up to 3 kW of power from the vehicle, turning the HUMMER EV SUV into a power source on the trail or a backup generator. HUMMER EV’s interdependent body/battery structure enables the Infinity Roof on the EV pickup as well as the SUV, and expected best-in-class off-road proportions help make the new SUV even more maneuverable — while making the most of the HUMMER EV’s signature features such as available CrabWalk3, available Extract Mode3 and more. Additional highlights: • Interdependent body/battery structure that supports a unique, double-stacked battery pack • An available three-motor Ultium Drive system that delivers up to 830 horsepower and up to 11,500 lb-ft of torque — enough power for super-fast 0-60-mph (0-97 km/h) sprints in approximately 3.5 seconds with available Watts-to-Freedom4 (based on GM estimates) • New available Power Station generator2 that enables 19.2kW AC charging, generator functionality (120v/25A/3kW)
  • An Evaluation of Changes in Capital Investment by Automotive Companies in Preparation for the Automotive Production and Development Programme (Apdp)

    An Evaluation of Changes in Capital Investment by Automotive Companies in Preparation for the Automotive Production and Development Programme (Apdp)

    AN EVALUATION OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL INVESTMENT BY AUTOMOTIVE COMPANIES IN PREPARATION FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (APDP) B.S. BACELA 2012 AN EVALUATION OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL INVESTMENT BY AUTOMOTIVE COMPANIES IN PREPARATION FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (APDP) BY BANDILE SAKHEKILE BACELA Treatise submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister in Business Administration at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Business School December 2012 Promoter: DR S SIMAYI ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION .............................................................................................................. V ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. VII CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH STUDY ............................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT ............................................................................................. 2 1.3 IMPORTANCE OF STUDY .......................................................................................... 3 1.4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK .....................................................................................