DOCSLIB.ORG

Dr. Wissowa on the Argei

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Dr. Wissowa on the Argei W. Warde Fowler The Classical Review / Volume 16 / Issue 02 / March 1902, pp 115 - 119 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00205519, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00205519 How to cite this article: W. Warde Fowler (1902). Dr. Wissowa on the Argei. The Classical Review, 16, pp 115-119 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00205519 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 128.122.253.228 on 12 Apr 2015 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. 115 the deflecting force of cognate words which berg's recension j it is certainly in dis- hegan with pot- succeeded finally in detach- agreement with the usage of Celsus as ing potus from the now isolated bibo, and already pointed out. The second is Valerius made it possible on the one hand for the Maximus 2. 4. 5 ' calefactamque aquam prodigious bibitus to spring up, and on the pueris bibendam dedit qua potata' e.q.s. other for Priscian to declare that the par- Here there is very good MS. authority for ticiple of poto was potus. pota. Valerius uses potauit in its proper To sum up : potum, potus, polurus, is for sense at 3, 6. 6. In Pliny N.H. 20. 136 classical Latin the proper supine and par- ' ad crapulae grauedines decocuntur folia ticiples of bibo (and of poto if used in the poturis' (potaluris E, d) either variant is simple sense of drinking) ; potatum, potatus, correct as Latin. potaturus of poto in its own frequentative I have set forth the facts relating to the sense. Thus ' mecum i potatum' Plaut. classical usage of these two indispensable Pseud. 1327; ' tamquam leuia quaedam uina verbs because they are widely ignored. I do nihil ualent in aqua, sic Stoicorum ista not claim that they are altogether unknown. magis gustata quam potata delectant' Cic. For example, after I had discovered for Tusc. 5 § 14 (pota would have been im- myself the true supine of bibo I found in possible); 'potaturus est apud me' Ter. M. Brenouf 's Les ffellenistnes dans la Syntaxe Phorm. 837. Latine p. 268 and n. (2) ' Le supine n'6tait Of the two exceptions to the classical pas usite pour certains verbes; ainsi bibitum usage that I have noticed in the texts of qui ne fut employe que tres tard...Il etait the writers of classical times one is Celsus remplace par potum ou potatum. Col. 12. < 4. 19 ad fin. where potata was condemned for 51. 3 dabitur potatum imbecillis bubusl a gloss by Targa and is omitted in Darem- Virg. Buc. 7. 11,' quoted above. of poto (=potum do) ibr which see Rb'nseh Ilala «. J. P. POSTGATE Vulgata, p. 376. 1 I hare not been able to find this place. DE. WISSOWA ON THE ARGEI. (IN PAULA'S RealrEncychpadie, ED. 2, VOL. I. PP. 689 foil.) THIS important article, if (as seems to be May 15 (according to Dionysius).1 Of the case in Germany) its conclusions be the first of these rites we know nothing accepted, goes far to solve an old and pro- certainly, though in Varro L.L. 5. 45-54 we voking difficulty in Roman religious antiqui- have fragments of what seems to be an ties. The section on this subject in my itinerary for the use of a procession going ' Roman Festivals' was written, and indeed round the sacella. Of the second we have rewritten, before *,he article reached me; tolerably explicit accounts; we know that and had I fully grasped the importance of the Pontifices (and according to Dionysius Dr. Wissowa's treatment of the subject I the o-rpanyyot) were present at the ceremony, should doubtless have written it a third also the Flaminica Dialis in mourning, and time. This, however, I failed to do until that the Vestals themselves cast the simul- after my book was in print. Now, after acra into the river. The connexion between most carefully considering Dr. Wissowa's the two rites is not absolutely certain, but arguments and conclusions, I feel compelled has generally been assumed as a fact since to make a few observations on them. Jordan wrote his chapter on the Argei in his It will be remembered that there are two Romische Topographie (II. 237 foil.). Nor rites at Rome connected with the name is it certain that the number of sacella and Argei; (1) in all probability a procession the number of simulacra was the same; this round 24 (or perhaps 27) sacella or sacraria cannot be proved from the text of Varro (cp. Argeorum, on March 16 and 17; (2) the L.L. 5. 45 and 7.44). Dr. Wissowa concludes casting of 27 (or possibly 24, or according that the number in each case was 27, to Dionysius 30) simulacra hominum made 1 The references will be found in fall in Wissowa's of rushes into the Tiber from the pons sub- article, and the most important in my Roman Festivals, licius on May 14 (according to Ovid) or p. Ill foil." I 2 116 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. following Mommsen's somewhat cautious revival of this etymology is this : Mommsen, note in Staatsrecht III. 125; this is the when writing the third volume of his conclusion which best suits his own views,1 Staatsrecht, applied to Willamowitz-Mol- and we may provisionally accept it, remem- lendorf for an opinion about the word, bering, however, that it is not a certainty. and part of the latter scholar's reply Thus it would seem that we have no very is quoted on p. 123 of that volume. One secure foundation for conjectures as to the sentence only seems to contain anything real meaning of either of the rites. But like a definite pronouncement; it runs since the appearance, first of Jordan's thus ' Ein Name fur das Hellenenvolk ist chapter, and secondly of that of Dr. Mann- das Wort nie gewesen,hochstens in Anschluss hardt in his Antike Wald- und Feldkulte, an Homer von Dichtern, zum Beispiel von some new light seemed to be thrown on the Ennius im Medea-prolog, so verwendet wor- mystery. We began to believe (1) that den.' Next H. Diels, in his valuable book on the sacella were the centres of some ancient the Sibylline oracles (p. 44, note) amplified ' Cultusordnung' of the districts which be- this sentence while endeavouring to show came the four Servian regions: (2) that the that the name Apyeioi came to Rome through casting of the simulacra into the Tiber was the Sibylline "oracles : this is the amplifica- a rite of very primitive character, possibly tion : ' Willamowitz (bei Mommsen I.e.) a rain-spell, which may be compared with hat richtig vorgehoben dass der Name (i.e. many strikingly similar ceremonies now Argei) griechischen TJrsprungs ist ('Apyeloi), familiar to anthropologists. Dr. Wissowa's und bei den Griechen nur in der von explanation is altogether different, and as Homer abhangigen Poesie synekdochisch fiir startling as it is interesting. It may be "EXkr]V€<s eintreten kann. Geht man von briefly stated thus. Both rites are of late diesem Fundament aus, so ist, mein' ich, der date, probably of the third century B.C., and Schluss zwingend, dass nur auf dem Wege of Greek origin: they are not survivals of griechischen Orakelpoesie, die ja mit epis- primitive custom or worship, as the ' com- chen Materiale wirtsnhaftet, die Argei in parative anthropologists' 2 would persuade dea Romischen Cult, und von da in die us. Probably (he writes) at some date Sprache iibergegangen sein kann.' Dr. between the first and second Punic war, a Wissowa now goes yet a step further, quoting Sibylline oracle directed that, in order to Diels as having proved the equation Argei = assuage a famine or pestilence, twenty-seven 'Apyetoi, and approves his conclusion that Greeks (the traditional enemies of Rome, there must have been an oracle in the third as he calls them) should be sacrificed by century ordering the sacrifice of twenty- being cast into the Tiber. If I understand seven Argei = Greek captives. In spite of him rightly, he believes that these victims these developments, a cautious inquirer will were first detained for a while at certain be apt to think that we are after all much points in the four Servian regions, so as to as we were about the etymology of the spread their healing influence throughout the name. I am quite unable to see that either city (this would be the origin of the March Willamowitz, Diels, or Wissowa have rite) : and that two months later they were proved anything either as to the history or taken in procession to the pons sublicius, the etymology of the word Argei. No and there sacrificed by drowning. He parallel instance of its use has been dis- conjectures that the actual sacrifice only covered, in the Sibylline oracles or else- occurred on the first occasion, and that where ; and the equation with 'Apyeioi is substitutes, in the form of the simulacra, as hypothetical as ever. The etymology took their place regularly in subsequent may be a little more likely than others, years. (see however H. Nettleship, Contributions to Latin Lexicography, s.v.), but an uncertain The evidence brought together for this etymology is of no practical use without a revolutionary theory is somewhat compli- history of the word — and that history is cated : but the leading points in it seem to in this case not forthcoming.
Recommended publications
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
  • Liberalia Tu Accusas ! Restituting the Ancient Date of Caesar’S Funus*

    Liberalia Tu Accusas ! Restituting the Ancient Date of Caesar’S Funus*

    LIBERALIA TU ACCUSAS ! RESTITUTING THE ANCIENT DATE OF CAESAR’S FUNUS* Francesco CAROTTA**, Arne EICKENBERG*** Résumé. – Du récit unanime des anciens historiographes il ressort que le funus de Jules César eut lieu le 17 mars 44 av. J.-C. Or la communauté académique moderne prétend presque aussi unanimement que cette date est erronée, sans s’accorder cependant sur une alternative. Dans la littérature scientifique on donne des dates entre le 18 et le 23, et plus précisément le 20 mars, en s’appuyant sur la chronologie avancée par Drumann et Groebe. L’analyse des sources historiques et des évènements qui suivirent l’assassinat de César jusqu’à ses funérailles, prouve que les auteurs anciens ne s’étaient pas trompés, et que Groebe avait reconnu la méprise de Drumann mais avait évité de l’amender. La correction de cette erreur invétérée va permettre de mieux examiner le contexte politique et religieux des funérailles de César. Abstract. – 17 March 44 BCE results from the reports by the ancient historiographers as to the date of Julius Caesar’s funus. However, today’s academic community has consistetly claimed that they were all mistaken, however, an alternative has not been agreed on. Dates between 18 and 23 March have been suggested in scientific literature—mostly 20 March, which is the date based on the chronology supplied by Drumann and Groebe. The analysis of the historical sources and of the events following Caesar’s murder until his funeral proves that the ancient writers were right, and that Groebe had recognized Drumann’s false dating, but avoided to adjust it.
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C

    Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
  • On the Months (De Mensibus) (Lewiston, 2013)

    On the Months (De Mensibus) (Lewiston, 2013)

    John Lydus On the Months (De mensibus) Translated with introduction and annotations by Mischa Hooker 2nd edition (2017) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .......................................................................................... iv Introduction .............................................................................................. v On the Months: Book 1 ............................................................................... 1 On the Months: Book 2 ............................................................................ 17 On the Months: Book 3 ............................................................................ 33 On the Months: Book 4 January ......................................................................................... 55 February ....................................................................................... 76 March ............................................................................................. 85 April ............................................................................................ 109 May ............................................................................................. 123 June ............................................................................................ 134 July ............................................................................................. 140 August ........................................................................................ 147 September ................................................................................
  • The Shops and Shopkeepers of Ancient Rome

    The Shops and Shopkeepers of Ancient Rome

    CHARM 2015 Proceedings Marketing an Urban Identity: The Shops and Shopkeepers of Ancient Rome 135 Rhodora G. Vennarucci Lecturer of Classics, Department of World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of Arkansas, U.S.A. Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of fixed-point retailing in the city of ancient Rome between the 2nd c BCE and the 2nd/3rd c CE. Changes in the socio-economic environment during the 2nd c BCE caused the structure of Rome’s urban retail system to shift from one chiefly reliant on temporary markets and fairs to one typified by permanent shops. As shops came to dominate the architectural experience of Rome’s streetscapes, shopkeepers took advantage of the increased visibility by focusing their marketing strategies on their shop designs. Through this process, the shopkeeper and his shop actively contributed to urban placemaking and the distribution of an urban identity at Rome. Design/methodology/approach – This paper employs an interdisciplinary approach in its analysis, combining textual, archaeological, and art historical materials with comparative history and modern marketing theory. Research limitation/implications – Retailing in ancient Rome remains a neglected area of study on account of the traditional view among economic historians that the retail trades of pre-industrial societies were primitive and unsophisticated. This paper challenges traditional models of marketing history by establishing the shop as both the dominant method of urban distribution and the chief means for advertising at Rome. Keywords – Ancient Rome, Ostia, Shop Design, Advertising, Retail Change, Urban Identity Paper Type – Research Paper Introduction The permanent Roman shop was a locus for both commercial and social exchanges, and the shopkeeper acted as the mediator of these exchanges.
  • Calendar of Roman Events

    Calendar of Roman Events

    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
  • A Roman Cult in the Italian Countryside? the Compitalia and the Shrines of the Lares Compitales

    A Roman Cult in the Italian Countryside? the Compitalia and the Shrines of the Lares Compitales

    0821-07_Babesch_83_08 23-09-2008 16:06 Pagina 111 BABESCH 83 (2008), 111-132. doi: 10.2143/BAB.83.0.2033102. A Roman cult in the Italian countryside? The Compitalia and the shrines of the Lares Compitales T.D. Stek Abstract The Roman religious festival of the Compitalia (‘cross-roads festival’) was celebrated in both city and coun- tryside. It is generally assumed that it originated as a rural cult which was later incorporated in the city, where it became the principal festival of the vici or urban quarters. In this paper it will be argued that the spread of the Compitalia might have been in the opposite direction; in this view the Compitalia, a Roman urban festi- val with administrative aspects, was spread outside Rome alongside Roman influence. It is not known where the Compitalia were celebrated in the countryside. It will be suggested that ancient ‘Italic’ sanctuaries have been re-used for celebrating the Roman rite of the Compitalia, apparently by now functioning within a Roman administrative and religious system.* the separation between city cult and family or farm cult should not be exaggerated (Beard/North/Price 1998, 50) INTRODUCTION. THE COMPITALIA: A PARADOXICAL both to what we would define the ‘private’ and PICTURE to the ‘public’ domain. Another paradoxical aspect regards the location At the end of a letter to Atticus (2.3), Cicero of the Compitalia. The festival is often associated writes, probably from his country house, after with the urban plebs, and therefore placed in an having referred to the political situation in Rome urban setting.
  • Roman Domestic Religion : a Study of the Roman Lararia

    Roman Domestic Religion : a Study of the Roman Lararia

    ROMAN DOMESTIC RELIGION : A STUDY OF THE ROMAN LARARIA by David Gerald Orr Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements fo r the degree of Master of Arts 1969 .':J • APPROVAL SHEET Title of Thesis: Roman Domestic Religion: A Study of the Roman Lararia Name of Candidate: David Gerald Orr Master of Arts, 1969 Thesis and Abstract Approved: UJ~ ~ J~· Wilhelmina F. {Ashemski Professor History Department Date Approved: '-»( 7 ~ 'ii, Ii (, J ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: Roman Domestic Religion: A Study of the Roman Lararia David Gerald Orr, Master of Arts, 1969 Thesis directed by: Wilhelmina F. Jashemski, Professor This study summarizes the existing information on the Roman domestic cult and illustrates it by a study of the arch­ eological evidence. The household shrines (lararia) of Pompeii are discussed in detail. Lararia from other parts of the Roman world are also studied. The domestic worship of the Lares, Vesta, and the Penates, is discussed and their evolution is described. The Lares, protective spirits of the household, were originally rural deities. However, the word Lares was used in many dif­ ferent connotations apart from domestic religion. Vesta was closely associated with the family hearth and was an ancient agrarian deity. The Penates, whose origins are largely un­ known, were probably the guardian spirits of the household storeroom. All of the above elements of Roman domestic worship are present in the lararia of Pompeii. The Genius was the living force of a man and was an important element in domestic religion.
  • The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome

    The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome

    THE ARGEI: SEX, WAR, AND CRUCIFIXION IN ROME AND THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Kristan Foust Ewin, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Christopher J. Fuhrmann, Major Professor Ken Johnson, Committee Member Walt Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Ewin, Kristan Foust. The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome and the Ancient Near East. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 119 pp., 2 tables, 18 illustrations, bibliography, 150 titles. The purpose of the Roman Argei ceremony, during which the Vestal Virgins harvested made and paraded rush puppets only to throw them into the Tiber, is widely debated. Modern historians supply three main reasons for the purpose of the Argei: an agrarian act, a scapegoat, and finally as an offering averting deceased spirits or Lares. I suggest that the ceremony also related to war and the spectacle of displaying war casualties. I compare the ancient Near East and Rome and connect the element of war and husbandry and claim that the Argei paralleled the sacred marriage. In addition to an agricultural and purification rite, these rituals may have served as sympathetic magic for pre- and inter-war periods. As of yet, no author has proposed the Argei as a ceremony related to war. By looking at the Argei holistically I open the door for a new direction of inquiry on the Argei ceremony, fertility cults in the Near East and in Rome, and on the execution of war criminals.
  • Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities

    Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities

    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2017 Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities Joy H. Kim Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Joy H., "Female Patronage of Public Space in Roman Cities". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2017. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/653 FEMALE PATRONAGE OF PUBLIC SPACE IN ROMAN CITIES By Joy Kim Senior Honors Thesis for Classical Studies and Urban Studies Advisors: Dr. Gary Reger, Dr. Garth Myers Spring 2017 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 DEFINING PATRONS AND BENEFACTORS ...................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 8 TYPES OF ROMAN PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE ................................................................................ 11 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................ 13 CHAPTER ONE: EXEMPLARY IMPERIAL WOMEN .....................................................
  • General Index

    General Index

    GENERAL INDEX Absyrtus 34 7 Allecto 106, 109 Achates 180 Allius (in Catullus) 107-8 Achelous 288, 292, 301 Alpheus 284 Achilles 128, 249, 288-89 + n. 53, Althea 291 289, 317' 322, 394-96 Amata 106-7, 109 Acmon 322 Amor(es) 242, 405 Acoetes 265-66, 292 see also Cupid Acontius 137-38 Amphimedon 241 Acrisius 289 anachronisms 280, 316, 320, 377, Actaeon 262-64, 379-80, 433 422 Actium, battle of 204 Romanizing 306, 315, 325 Adonis 286, 377 analepsis see flashback adynaton/ a 342, 365-66, 374 Ancaeus 377 Aeacus 284 Anchises 179, 223 Aeneas 128, 206, 312, 326, 437 ancile 224-25, 230 apotheosis of 199-200, 311-12, Andromeda 240-42, 244, 289 321-27, 329 Anna (sister of Dido) 180-81 in Fasti 179-80, 182, 203, 212, Anna Perenna 172, 183, 198, 214, 230 213 n. 43, 397 in Met. 309-12, 322-24, 326-27 identified with Anna, sister of Dido Virgil's 128, 179-80, 207, 240-42, 180 244-45, 249, 263, 289, 396 Antimachus 50 Aesacus 307, 318-19, 326 Antinous 242 Aeschylus 130, 259, 267 Antony, Marc (Marcus Antonius) 8, see also tragedy, Greek 197 n. 2, 206 Aesculapius 173-74 Aphrodite 173, 212 Aetas Ovidiana 413, 422 see also Venus see also Ovid, medieval reception of; Apollo 11-12, 47, 67, 84, 163, Ovid, works of, s.v. transmission 177-78, 184, 186, 230, 376, 437 Aethion 241 Callimachean 28, 175 aetiology 174-75, 178, 193-95, oracle of, at Delos 263 208-9, 213, 248, 252, 257, 274, oracle of, at Delphi 240, 250, 253, 276-77, 318-19, 324, 326, 398 263 see also 'aition' in Met.
  • Introduction. Dionysus in Rome: Accommodation and Resistance

    Introduction. Dionysus in Rome: Accommodation and Resistance

    Fiachra Mac Góráin Introduction. Dionysus in Rome: accommodation and resistance Abstract: This introductory chapter provides a wide-angle history of the presence of Dionysus/Bacchus/Liber on Italian soil from the archaic to the early Christian periods, covering archaeological and literary sources. In parallel, it surveys the main scholarly trends on the Italian versions of Dionysus, and emplots the con- tributions to this volume in a history of scholarship. The main focus of the chap- ter, which is programmatic for the volume, is the interface of Greek and Roman cultures, and whether it is possible to identify and define (an) Italian version(s) of Dionysus. It posits two aspects to the Romans’ reception of Bacchus, which may be termed ‘accommodation’ and ‘resistance’. The interplay between these two levels of response will inform an analytic narrative that assesses the relation- ship between the Greek Dionysus and the Roman Liber, embracing interpretatio and religious polymorphism, and addressing some of the most important Diony- sian manifestations in Roman culture: the founding of the temple of Ceres, Liber and Libera; the Bacchanalia; the Liberalia; Roman leaders’ uses of Dionysus; the poets’ references to Bacchus; and a brief glance at the Bacchic-Christian inter- face. As ‘our oldest living symbol’,1 Dionysus/Bacchus has evolved over many different forms. Until relatively recently, scholars believed that he was an import from the East, and a late addition to the Greek pantheon. Rohde, Nilsson, Wilamowitz and Otto all subscribed to different versions of the Nietzschean myth that an ecstatic Dionysus cult was assimilated from Thrace and tamed by the influence of Apollo.2 This view was based on the god’s slight role in the Homeric poems, coupled with For discussion of Dionysus in Rome and bibliographical advice, I wish to thank Clifford Ando, Andreas Bendlin, Tom Carpenter, Michael Crawford, Elena Giusti, Dan Hogg, Duncan MacRae, John North, Donncha O’Rourke, Richard Seaford, and Peter Wiseman.