DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham E-Theses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham E-Theses In whose name I write: John Henry Newman;s reading of the Alexandrian fathers King, Benjamin John How to cite: King, Benjamin John (2007) In whose name I write: John Henry Newman;s reading of the Alexandrian fathers, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2454/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 "In whose name I write": John Henry Newman's reading of the Alexandrian Fathers. Benjamin John King Ph.D. in the Department ofTheology The University ofDurham 2007 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author or the university to which it was submitted. No quotation from it, or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author or university, and any information derived from it should be acknowledged. - 3 MAY 2007 "In whose name I write": John Henry Newman's reading of the Alexandrian Fathers Benjamin King The history of doctrine has been shaped by its historiographers. Prominent among nineteenth-century historiographers is John Henry Newman (1801-1890), a patristic scholar whose interest among historians today normally lies in his writings on doctrinal development or in his own story of conversion. It is the purpose of this thesis to show that historians of theology, particularly of the patristic era, should also be interested in Newman's engagement with Origen, Athanasius and Cyril of Alexandria. In tum, this should interest all those who know the Apologia, for as an Anglican and as a Catholic Newman held different views of these Fathers. This thesis provides an examination of the changes that occur in Newman's reading of, and writing on, the Alexandrians Fathers across the years. Overall, three things will be seen. First, comparing his first book, The Arians of the Fourth Century (1833), with his later works, reveals a flattening out ofNewman's account of history occurring just when he was propounding that doctrine is dynamic. Secondly, analysis of his sermons ofthe 1830s and 1840s shows an Alexandrian christology ("Monophysite" in Cyril's sense, as Newman explains it) in tension with his claims at the time, that he was leaving the Anglican Church because it held an analogous position to the Monophysites of the fifth century. Thirdly, contrasting his translations of Athanasius in the Library of the Fathers (1842-4) with his "free translation" (1881), reveals the effect thirty-five years of reading Catholic scholastic theology had on Newman. Contents. Acknowledgements 3 Abbreviations 4 Introduction· 6 1 Newman and doctrinal truth: An examination across the years 13 2 A Play of Mirrors: Newman and his sources in The Arians of the Fourth Century 62 3 Preaching the Word: The Alexandrian shape ofNewman's christology 118 4 The Homoousion before and after Nicaea: The Eclipse of Origen and the Rise of Athanas ius 163 5 The Athanasius "with whom I end": Arianism and Origen revisited 198 Conclusion: A Latin Athanasius for a Scholastic Newman 235 Bibliography 242 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any format, including electronic and the internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged accordingly. 2 Acknowledgements. My thanks must go first to my supervisor, Fr. Andrew Louth, whose warm words and wonderful writings have inspired so much of this thesis. Also, to my examiners, Professor Nicholas Lash and the Rev'd Canon Professor David Brown: it was an honour to receive their insights and encouragement on a cold day in Durham. On the other side of the Atlantic, however, the Rev' d Professor Sarah Coakley deserves the greatest thanks. She gave me the idea of looking at Newman's work on the Fathers and helped me draft a thesis proposal. Since then her continued interest in my findings has inspired new directions in my research. It is a privilege to know that it will soon be the case that two Norris-Hulse Professors have been so involved in this thesis. My remaining debts are divided between America and Britain. In America, I must thank Professor Fred Lawrence and the Rev'd Dr. Charles Hefting for all their wisdom and guidance. Without Fred, in particular, I might have ended up studying something rather different. I must thank the Rev'd Professor Brian Daley for his generosity in taking time to answer my many questions and to give his constant encouragement. Professor Frank Turner also gave me warm encouragement. Dr. David Cunningham helped me structure the early stages ofthis research and I talked through many of my ideas with Dr. Todd Billings. The Rev'd Don Larsen and Dr. Joseph Chapman have also been a great help. And thanks to my other supervisor, Mrs. Polly Warren, for all her guidance. In Britain, my constant academic companions, Dr. Matthew Treheme and the Rev'd Edmund Newey, deserve enormous thanks. Good fortune brought us together, but good conversation has sealed our friendship. Philip McCosker has also been wonderful for theological conversation and, kindly, has even moved to New Haven to make this easier. I could not have produced this thesis without two other immigrants to the US. Fr. John Behr inspired me with his lectures and has generously read through a portion of this text. Dr. Dominic Doyle also read through a chapter and here, as well as in conversation, has helped improve my ideas. Finally, thanks to Mum and Colin who took me to the viva, and to Dad who promises to read the thesis. 3 Abbreviations. Newman's works cited (the uniform edition is not always used) Apo Apologia Pro Vita Sua ed. Martin Svaglic (Oxford: OUP, 1967). Arians The Arians of the Fourth Century Birmingham Oratory Millennium Edition, ed. Rowan Williams (Notre Dame: University ofNotre Dame Press, 2001). 1 Ath i, ii Select Treatises of Athanasius Against the Arians 4 h edition (London: Longmans, 1903) 2 vols. BI The Theological Papers ofJohn Henry Newman on Biblical Inspiration and Infallibility ed. J. Derek Holmes (Oxford: OUP, 1979). Cal Callista: A Sketch of the Third Centwy (London: Bums and Oats, 1962). CF The Church of the Fathers Birmingham Oratory Millennium ·Edition, ed. Francis McGrath (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002). Cons On Consulting the Faithful in Matters ofDoctrine ed. John Coulson (London: Collins Flame Classics, 1986). DA Discussions and Arguments on Various Subjects Birmingham Oratory Millennium Edition, ed. Gerard Tracey and James Tolhurst (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004). Dev An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine 2nd edition (London: James Toovey, 1846). Dev (1878) An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (London: Longmans, 1909). Diffi, ii Certain Difficulties Felt by Anglicans (London: Longmans, 1901) 2 vols. EH i, ii Essays Critical and Historical (London: Longmans, 1907) 2 vols. Fleury i The Ecclesiastical History ofM L 'Abbe Fleury vol. i translated with notes and "Essay on the Miracles Recorded in Ecclesiastical History" by Newman (Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1842). GA An Essay in Aid of a Grammar ofAssent (London: Longmans, 1903). HS i, ii, iii Historical Sketches (London: Longmans, 1908) 3 vols. Jfc Lectures on the Doctrine ofJustification 3rd ed. (Oxford: Rivingtons, 1874). LD Letters and Diaries ofJohn Henry Newman. Man "The Monophysite Heresy" OM, B.2.5. Mix Discourses addressed to Mixed Congregations (London: Longmans, 1906). OM Birmingham Oratory Manuscript. Ox Frs ii The Catechetical Lectures ofS. Cyril vol. ii of A Library of the Fathers (Oxford: Rivingtons, 1839). Ox Frs iii The Treatises ofS. Cyprian vol. iii of A Library ofthe Fathers (Oxford: Rivingtons, 1839). 4 Ox Frs viii, xix Select Treatises ofS. Athanas ius in Controversy with the Arians vols. viii and xix of A Library of the Fathers (Oxford: Rivingtons, 1842, 1844). Prepos Lectures on the Present Position of Catholics in England (London: Rivingtons, 1908). PS Parochial and Plain Sermons (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1997) 8 vols. Original vol. and sermon number are given below, then page. SD Sermons bearing on the Subjects of the Day (London: Longmans, 1898). SN Sermon Notes ofJohn Henry Newman ed. The Fathers of the Birmingham Oratory (London: Longmans, 1913). TT Tracts Theological and Ecclesiastical1 st edition (Basil Montague Pickering, 1874). us Fifteen Sermons preached before the University of Oxford ed. D.M. MacKinnon and J.D. Holmes (London: SPCK, 1970). VMi, ii The Via Media 3rd edition (London: Longmans, 1877) 2 vols. Other works cited ANF Ante-Nicene Fathers. Apostolici Cave, William, Apostolici, or, The history of the lives, acts, death, and martyrdoms of those who were contemporary with or immediately succeeding the Apostles (London: A. C. for Richard Chiswell, 1677). de Prinicipiis Origen, On First Principles trans. G.W. Butterworth (Gloucester MA: Peter Smith, 1973). de reb i, ii Mosheim, Johann, Historical Commentaries on the State of Christianity during the first three hundred and twenty-five years from the Christian Era E.T.
Recommended publications
  • John Henry Newman and the Significance of Theistic Proof

    John Henry Newman and the Significance of Theistic Proof

    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 1983 John Henry Newman and the Significance of Theistic Proof Mary Susan Glasson University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Glasson, Mary Susan, "John Henry Newman and the Significance of Theistic Proof" (1983). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1530. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1530 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. - JOHNHENRY NEWMAN ANDTHE SIGNIFICANCE OF THEISTICPROOF BY MARYSUSAN GLASSON A THESISSUBMITTED IN PARTIALFULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTSFOR THE DEGREEOF MASTEROF ARTS IN PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITYOF RHODEISLAND 1983 ABSTRACT The central problem of this paper is to decide the significance of formal argument for God's existence, in light of John Henry Newman's distinction between notional and real assent. If God in fact exists, then only real assent to the proposition asserting his existence is adequate. Notional assent is inadequate because it is assent to a notion or abstraction, and not to a present reality. But on Newman's view it is notional assent which normally follows on a formal inference, therefore the significance of traditional formal arguments is thrown into question. Newman has claimed that our attitude toward a proposition may be one of three; we may doubt it, infer it, or assent to it, and to assent to it is to hold it unconditionally.
  • “Making Church of England Poetical” Ephraim and the Oxford Movement

    “Making Church of England Poetical” Ephraim and the Oxford Movement

    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 2.1, 111–129 © 1999 [2010] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press “MAKING CHURCH OF ENGLAND POETICAL” EPHRAIM AND THE OXFORD MOVEMENT GEOFFREY ROWELL BISHOP OF BASINGSTOKE BISHOPSWOOD END, KINGSWOOD RISE ENGLAND [1] In 1966 Donald Allchin gave a paper at an Oxford symposium entitled “The theological vision of the Oxford Movement,” in which he explored the important unpublished series of lectures by Pusey dating from 1836, entitled “On Types & Prophecies.” A footnote to the published volume of the conference papers acknowledges with gratitude Robert Murray’s comment about the Semitic quality of Pusey’s thought, suggesting that it was reminiscent of the Syrian Fathers, even more than the Greek. Allchin notes there that Father R. M. Benson, a close disciple of Pusey and the founder of the The Society of St. John the Evangelist (“the Cowley Fathers”), the first religious community for men in the Church of England, was also a theologian who “was first of all a Hebraist, and then a patristic scholar.” This same footnote contains the words: “The possibility of a direct influence of St. Ephrem the Syrian on Pusey would be worth investigating.”1 This might be regarded as the starting-point for the present paper. 1 A. M. Allchin, “The theological vision of the Oxford Movement,” in J. Coulson and A.M. Allchin (eds.), The Rediscovery of Newman: An Oxford Symposium, (London, 1967) 50–75, p. 69, note 1. 111 112 Geoffrey Rowell [2] The title, “Making the Church of England poetical,” is an allusion
  • Oxford Movement

    Oxford Movement

    Oxford Movement This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on theLearn talk more The Oxford Movement was a movement of High Church members of the Church of England which eventually developed into Anglo-Catholicism. The movement, whose original devotees were mostly associated with the University of Oxford, argued for the reinstatement of some older Christian traditions of faith and their inclusion into Anglican liturgy and theology. They thought of Anglicanism as one of three branches of the "one holy, catholic, and apostolic" Christian church. By the 1840s many participants decided that the Anglican Church lacked grace, and converted to Roman Catholicism. Edward John Henry Bouverie Newman Pusey The movement's philosophy was known as Tractarianism after its series of publications, the Tracts for the Times, published from 1833 to 1841. Tractarians were also disparagingly referred to as "Newmanites" (before 1845) and "Puseyites" (after 1845) after two prominent Tractarians, John Henry Newman and Edward Bouverie Pusey. Other well-known Tractarians included John Keble, Charles Marriott, Richard Froude, Robert Wilberforce, Isaac Williams and William Palmer. Origins and early period In the early nineteenth century, different groups were present in the Church of England. Many, particularly in high office, saw themselves as latitudinarian (liberal) in an attempt to broaden the Church's appeal. Conversely, many clergy in the parishes were Evangelicals, as a result of the revival led by John Wesley. Alongside this, the universities became the breeding ground for a movement to restore liturgical and devotional customs which borrowed heavily from traditions before the English Reformation as well as contemporary Roman Catholic traditions.[1] The immediate impetus for the Tractarian movement was a perceived attack by the reforming Whig administration on the structure and revenues of the Church of Ireland (the established church in Ireland), with the Irish Church Temporalities Bill (1833).
  • Saint John Henry Newman, Development of Doctrine, and Sensus Fidelium: His Enduring Legacy in Roman Catholic Theological Discourse

    Saint John Henry Newman, Development of Doctrine, and Sensus Fidelium: His Enduring Legacy in Roman Catholic Theological Discourse

    Journal of Moral Theology, Vol. 10, No. 2 (2021): 60–89 Saint John Henry Newman, Development of Doctrine, and Sensus Fidelium: His Enduring Legacy in Roman Catholic Theological Discourse Kenneth Parker The whole Church, laity and hierarchy together, bears responsi- bility for and mediates in history the revelation which is contained in the holy Scriptures and in the living apostolic Tradition … [A]ll believers [play a vital role] in the articulation and development of the faith …. “Sensus fidei in the life of the Church,” 3.1, 67 International Theological Commission of the Catholic Church Rome, July 2014 N 2014, THE INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL Commission pub- lished “Sensus fidei in the life of the Church,” which highlighted two critically important theological concepts: development and I sensus fidelium. Drawing inspiration directly from the works of John Henry Newman, this document not only affirmed the insights found in his Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (1845), which church authorities embraced during the first decade of New- man’s life as a Catholic, but also his provocative Rambler article, “On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine” (1859), which resulted in episcopal accusations of heresy and Newman’s delation to Rome. The tension between Newman’s theory of development and his appeal for the hierarchy to consider the experience of the “faithful” ultimately centers on the “seat” of authority, and whose voices matter. As a his- torical theologian, I recognize in the 175 year reception of Newman’s theory of development, the controversial character of this historio- graphical assumption—or “metanarrative”—which privileges the hi- erarchy’s authority to teach, but paradoxically acknowledges the ca- pacity of the “faithful” to receive—and at times reject—propositions presented to them as authoritative truth claims.1 1 Maurice Blondel, in his History and Dogma (1904), emphasized that historians always act on metaphysical assumptions when applying facts to the historical St.
  • Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University

    Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation.
  • University College Dublin, Dublin- Ireland Facts

    University College Dublin, Dublin- Ireland Facts

    University College Dublin, Dublin- Ireland Facts • Language of instruction: English • Number of students currently enrolled: 33,000 • Semester 1: Early September – Late December • Semester 2: Mid-January - Late May • Important information: http://www.ucd.ie/international/exchange- programmes/incoming-exchanges/erasmus-exchange-information/ About the University Founded in 1854 by Cardinal John Henry Newman, University College Dublin (UCD) is Ireland’s largest and most richly diversified university. Today UCD is a vibrant, modern university of over 33,000 students situated on a spacious and leafy campus some 5km to the south of Dublin city centre. Located on the east coast of Ireland, Dublin began as a Viking settlement founded over one thousand years ago. In the 21st century, with a population of over one million people, Dublin is the thriving capital of the Republic of Ireland and is the centre of the political, diplomatic, administrative and commercial life of the country. Famous for its literary tradition, Ireland's capital has been home to writers from Jonathan Swift to William Butler Yeats and James Joyce. Dublin allows you to explore both the historical and the modern, from castles and churches to cafés and clubs. Website: http://www.ucd.ie/ What to expect Application process If you are allocated for an exchange at the University College Dublin, you will be officially nominated by the Go Abroad Office and will then be provided with your detailed application instructions. You can ONLY apply if officially nominated. Type of Application: You will receive an email with application instructions. The application form is online. Notes of Guidance for Exchange students University College Dublin Academics Course/ credit load One full year of study should equate to 60 ECTS.
  • The Legacy of Sovereign

    The Legacy of Sovereign

    LegacySovereignJoy.48134.int.qxd 9/21/07 10:01 AM Page 1 T HE L EGACY OF S OVEREIGN J OY LegacySovereignJoy.48134.int.qxd 9/21/07 10:01 AM Page 2 OTHER BOOKS BY THE AUTHOR The Justification of God: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 9:1–23 2nd Edition (Baker Book House, 1993, orig. 1983) The Supremacy of God in Preaching (Baker Book House, 1990) The Pleasures of God: Meditations on God’s Delight in Being God (Multnomah Press, 1991) Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism (edited with Wayne Grudem, Crossway Books, 1991) What’s the Difference? Manhood and Womanhood Defined According to the Bible (Crossway Books, 1991) Let the Nations Be Glad: The Supremacy of God in Missions (Baker Book House, 1993) The Purifying Power of Living by Faith in Future Grace (Multnomah Press, 1995) Desiring God: Meditations of a Christian Hedonist (Multnomah Press, revised 1996) A Hunger for God: Desiring God through Fasting and Prayer (Crossway Books, 1997) A Godward Life: Savoring the Supremacy of God in All of Life (Multnomah Press, 1997) God’s Passion for His Glory: Living the Vision of Jonathan Edwards (Crossway Books, 1998) The Innkeeper (Crossway Books, 1998) A Godward Life, Book Two: Savoring the Supremacy of God in All of Life (Multnomah Press, 1999) LegacySovereignJoy.48134.int.qxd 9/21/07 10:01 AM Page 3 s a r e n a n o t w s s i l e e n h t t BOOK ONE LegTHEacy of Sovereign Joy God’s Triumphant Grace in the Lives of Augustine, Luther, and Calvin J OHN P IPER CROSSWAY BOOKS A PUBLISHING MINISTRY OF GOOD NEWS PUBLISHERS WHEAT O N , ILLINO IS LegacySovereignJoy.48134.int.qxd 9/21/07 10:01 AM Page 4 The Legacy of Sovereign Joy Copyright © 2000 by John Piper Published by Crossway Books a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers 1300 Crescent Street Wheaton, Illinois 60187 All rights reserved.
  • Saint Anselm, Blessed John Henry Newman, and the Idea of a Benedictine University

    Saint Anselm, Blessed John Henry Newman, and the Idea of a Benedictine University

    Saint Anselm, Blessed John Henry Newman, and the Idea of a Benedictine University Fr. Daniel Patrick Moloney, Ph.D. John Henry Newman's "Benedictine Essays" develop a strong thesis that Benedictine spirituality is necessarily at odds with the methods of the modern university. Benedictine spiritual life encourages the monk to mortify his intellect, not to satisfy it or to stir it up. It is best suited to grammar school, to the study of literature and history and Scripture, while rejecting the value of studying worldly topics that don't prepare a person for union with God in the next life. Newman's account makes the project of a Benedictine university like St. Anselm's College seem deeply problematic, even oxymoronic. St. Anselm of Canterbury, a transitional figure on Newman's account, shows some ways of reconciling a speculative intellectual life with Benedictine spirituality, but Newman's challenge to the project still remains. It’s a great honor to be here. When I was invited to give this lecture, that is to give the Saint Anselm Lecture at Saint Anselm College on the Feast of Saint Anselm, I thought I noticed a theme. I’m an expert on Saint Anselm, having written my dissertation on your patron saint and having been studying him since I was a senior in college more than twenty years ago. So I figured that the topic of my talk was going to be Saint Anselm. But then I read the fine print of the invitation, and realized that because this year is the anniversary of the College, that I was being asked to talk not just about Saint Anselm and his continued significance, but about something I didn’t know anything about, namely “distinctively Benedictine Catholic higher education.” I’m sure that’s a topic of some reflection here, at a Benedictine College, but it’s not something I’ve ever thought about.
  • An Eirenicon

    An Eirenicon

    THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND A PORTION OF CHRIST’S ONE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH, AND A MEANS OF RESTORING VISIBLE UNITY. AN EIRENICON, In a Letter TO THE AUTHOR OF “THE CHRISTIAN YEAR.” BY E. B. PUSEY, D.D., REGIUS PROFESSOR OF HEBREW, AND CANON OF CHRIST CHURCH, OXFORD. NEW YORK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 1866 Project Canterbury AD 2003 An Eirenicon, by Edward Bouverie Pusey (1866) MY DEAREST FRIEND, You think that, Dr. Manning’s last letter having been addressed to myself, it is desirable that I should in some way reply to it. It would cost me much, not to undertake any task which you might wish me to essay. You know how long it has been my wish to part with all controversy, and to consecrate the evening of my life to the unfolding of some of the deep truths of God’s Holy Word, as God might enable me, by aid of those whom He has taught in times past. This employment, and practical duties which God has brought to me, were my ideal of the employments of the closing years of a laborious life. The inroad made upon the Gospel by unbelievers, or half-believers, compelled me in part to modify this my hope. Still, since there is a common foe, pressing alike upon all who believe in Jesus, I the more hoped, at least, to be freed from any necessity of controversy with any who hold the Catholic faith. The recent personal appeal of Dr. Manning to myself seems, as you and other friends think, to call for an exception to this too; yet, since “the night cometh when no man can work,” I trust that I shall not be thought to shrink from duty, if, hereafter, I should maintain a silence, in order to give myself to that which seems to me more especially my calling.
  • (2019), No. 7 1 Some Marginalia in Burnet's

    (2019), No. 7 1 Some Marginalia in Burnet's

    Some Marginalia in Burnet’s History of My Own Time Gilbert Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury (1643–1715) had no known connection with New College during his lifetime, and very little contact with the University of Oxford. He was a graduate of the University of Aberdeen, and as a young man he had served briefly as Professor of Divinity in the University of Glasgow, but he is not remembered primarily as an academic or as a scholar. Yet, long after his death, New College Library acquired a copy of one of Burnet’s books of very considerable interest to those historians of the British Isles who specialize in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. To explain why this is so, it is necessary first to describe Burnet, and the part he played in the affairs of the period through which he lived. I Burnet began to compile the final version of his History of My Own Time, the book in question, in about 1703, during the reign of Queen Anne. It was an exercise in contemporary history, rather than an autobiography, and it covered, in a narrative format, the years from the Restoration of 1660 to, eventually, the conclusion of the War of the Spanish Succession at the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. An introductory chapter covered the reign of Charles I, the civil wars in Scotland and England, and the Interregnum. It was well known to contemporaries that Burnet was engaged in writing what was called his ‘Secret History’, and its publication was awaited with keen anticipation, because Burnet was a celebrated figure both in ecclesiastical affairs and in secular politics.
  • The Oxford Architectural and Historical Society and the Oxford Movement

    The Oxford Architectural and Historical Society and the Oxford Movement

    The Oxford Architectural and Historical Society and the Oxford Movement By S. L. OLLARD (Read before the Society, 31 May, 1939) y the Oxford Movement I understand the religious revival which began B with John Keble's sermon on National Apostasy preached in St. Mary's on 14 July, 1833. The strictly Oxford stage of that Movement, its first chapter, ended in 1845 with the degradation of W. G. Ward in February and the secession to Rome of Mr. Newman and his friends at Littlemore in the following October. I am not very much concerned in this paper with the story after that date, though I have pursued it in the printed reports and other sources up to 1852. The Oxford Movement was at base a moral movement. The effect of 18th century speculation and of the French Revolution had been to force men's minds back to first principles. Reform had begun. In England it had shaken the foundations of the existing parliamentary system, and the Church itself seemed in danger of being reformed away. Some of its supposed safeguards, e.g., the penal laws against Nonconformists and Roman Catholics, had been removed, yet abuses, pluralism and non-residence for instance, remained ob­ vious weaknesses. Meanwhile, most of its official defenders were not armed with particularly spiritual weapons. The men of the Oxford Movement were con­ vinced of a great truth, namely that the English Church was a living part of the one Holy Catholic Church: that it was no state-created body, but part of the Society founded by the Lord Himself with supernatural powers and super­ natural claims.
  • Belief in a Secular Age: Charles Taylor, John Henry Newman, and the New Evangelization David C

    Belief in a Secular Age: Charles Taylor, John Henry Newman, and the New Evangelization David C

    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Jesuit School of Theology Dissertations Student Scholarship 4-2018 Belief in a Secular Age: Charles Taylor, John Henry Newman, and the New Evangelization David C. Paternostro Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/jst_dissertations Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Paternostro, David C., "Belief in a Secular Age: Charles Taylor, John Henry Newman, and the New Evangelization" (2018). Jesuit School of Theology Dissertations. 29. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/jst_dissertations/29 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jesuit School of Theology Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Belief in a Secular Age: Charles Taylor, John Henry Newman, and the New Evangelization A thesis by David C. Paternostro, S.J. Presented to the Faculty of the Jesuit School of Theology of Santa Clara University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Licentiate in Sacred Theology Berkeley, California April 2018 Committee Signatures: __________________________ Thomas Cattoi, Ph.D. (Director) 24 April 2018 ________________________________ Jerome Baggett, Ph.D. (Second Reader) 24 April 2018 Acknowledgements---------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii Abstract----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iii