Unit 10 Bhagat Singh : the Martyr and His Ideology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Ghadar Movement: Why Socialists Should Learn About It
Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 13 (2) Fall 2018 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Article THE GHADAR MOVEMENT: WHY SOCIALISTS SHOULD LEARN ABOUT IT RADHA D’SOUZA University of Westminster KASIM ALI TIRMIZEY York University Exile did not suit me, I took it for my homeland When the noose of my net tightened, I called it my nest. Mirza Asadullah Khan “Ghalib” [b. December 1797, Agra, India, d. February 1869, Delhi, India]1 I In May 2016 Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau formally apologized on behalf of the Government of Canada for the 1914 Komagata Maru incident, a singular event in the anti-colonial struggle against the British Empire launched by the newly formed Ghadar Party in North America. The apology came even as the anti-migrant vitriol in the wider society amplified. In late 2013 and again in early 2014, a memorial for the Ghadar martyrs in Harbour Green Park in Vancouver was vandalised twice within months. Notwithstanding the antagonism against immigrants in the public domain, Trudeau’s apology had settled Canada’s accounts with history and able to “move on.” The Trudeau government appointed Harjit Sajjan, a retired Lieutenant Colonel and war veteran in the Canadian Army as the defence minister, the first South Asian to hold the position. In 2011, Harjit Singh was interestingly made the commanding officer of one of the Canadian Army regiments that was historically involved in preventing passengers aboard the Komagata Maru from disembarking. Harjit Sajjan was deployed in Afghanistan where he used his familiarity with language, culture and traditions of the region in favour of imperialist agendas in the region, the very Afghanistan where the Ghadarites from his home state were instrumental in establishing the first government-in-exile of free India a hundred years ago. -
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (Also Known As the Amritsar Massacre) Was a Notorious Episode in the History of British Colonialism in India
DEBATE PACK CDP 2019-0085 (2019) | 8 April 2019 Compiled by: Jallianwala Bagh Tim Robinson Subject specialist: massacre Jon Lunn Contents Westminster Hall 1. Background 2 2. Press Articles 4 Tuesday 9 April 2019 3. Parliamentary material 6 3.1 PQs 6 2.30pm to 4.00pm 3.2 Debates 7 3.1 Early Day Motions 9 Debate initiated by Bob Blackman MP 3.2 Foreign Affairs Committee 10 4. Further reading 11 The proceedings of this debate can be viewed on Parliamentlive.tv The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP 2019-0085, 8 April 2019 1. Background The 13 April 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre (also known as the Amritsar massacre) was a notorious episode in the history of British colonialism in India. Britannica provides this overview: British troops fired on a large crowd of unarmed Indians in an open space known as the Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar in the Punjab region (now in Punjab state) of India, killing several hundred people and wounding many hundreds more. It marked a turning point in India’s modern history, in that it left a permanent scar on Indo-British relations and was the prelude to Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi’s full commitment to the cause of Indian nationalism and independence from Britain. -
Encyclopedia of Law & Society
Encyclopedia of Law & Society: American and Global Perspectives Civil Disobedience Contributors: Shubhankar Dam Editors: David S. Clark Book Title: Encyclopedia of Law & Society: American and Global Perspectives Chapter Title: "Civil Disobedience" Pub. Date: 2007 Access Date: December 08, 2014 Publishing Company: Sage Publications, Inc. City: Thousand Oaks Print ISBN: 9780761923879 Online ISBN: 9781412952637 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412952637.n95 Print pages: 196-199 ©2007 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from SAGE knowledge. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book. SAGE ©2007 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. SAGE knowledge http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412952637.n95 Scholars often credit Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862) with the origin of the term civil disobedience in his essay of the same name, which he wrote after spending a night in jail in 1846 for refusing to pay the Massachusetts poll tax. As a concept in political theory, civil disobedience has defied definitional precision. Writers frequently use conscientious evasion, conscientious refusal, nonviolent resistance, pacifism, and passive resistance to convey ideas similar to civil disobedience. David Daube (1909– 1999) argued that civil disobedience is “an offense against human authority, committed openly in a higher cause, or a cause thought to be higher” (1972: 1). John Rawls (1921– 2002) endeavored to constitutionally theorize civil disobedience by defining it as “a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government” (2000: 363). -
03 1. Why Did Gandhiji Organise Satyagraha in 1917 in Kheda District of Gujarat?
CLASS:-10TH, HISTORY, MCQ QUESTIONS ,CHAPTER:-03 NATIONALISM IN INDIA 1. Why did Gandhiji organise Satyagraha in 1917 in Kheda district of Gujarat? (a) To support the plantation workers (b) To protest against high revenue demand (c) To support the mill workers to fulfil their demand (d) To demand loans for the farmers Answer: b 2. Why was Satyagraha organised in Champaran in 1916? (a) To oppose the British laws (b) To oppose the plantation system (c) To oppose high land revenue (d) To protest against the oppression of the mill workers Answer:-b 2. Why was the Simon Commission sent to India? (a) To look into the Indian constitutional matter and suggest reform (b) To choose members of Indian Council (c) To settle disputes between the government and the Congress leaders (d) To set up a government organisation Answer: a 4. Why was Alluri Sitarama Raju well known? (a) He led the militant movement of tribal peasants in Andhra Pradesh. (b) He led a peasant movement in Avadh. (c) He led a satyagraha movement in Bardoli. (d) He set up an organisation for the uplifment of the dalits. Answer: a 5. Why did General Dyer open fire on peaceful crowd in Jallianwalla Bagh? Mark the most important factor. (a) To punish the Indians (b) To take revenge for breaking martial laws (c) To create a feeling of terror and awe in the mind of Indians (d) To disperse the crowd Answer: c 6. What kind of movement was launched by the tribal peasants of Gudem Hills in Andhra Pradesh? (a) Satyagraha Movement (b) Militant Guerrilla Movement (c) Non-Violent Movement (d) None of the above Answer: b 7. -
1 the Pakistan Movement: a Prologue
1 The Pakistan Movement: A Prologue While the administrative and legal uniformity of British India appeared to be an impressive achievement, the increasing commu nal, religious, cultural and political diversities together with new educational and politico-economic prospects were producing a curious situation. In the post-1857 decades South Asian Mus lims suffered from alienation and a deep sense of loss as the British held them mainly responsible for the outbreak of the revolt. The lack ofmanoeuvrability, with no realleadership and an almost complete absence of channels and opportunities avail able to the wider community, left them in astate of chaos. 1 The early traditions of revivalism and resistance would need many more decades and intellects to regenerate a dynamic sense of self-preservation. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Syed Ameer Ali tried to reconcile the Muslims to the new realities by stressing 'adjustment' to rather than 'rejection' of western ideas and institutions.2 But it was not until a generation after them and 'the founding fathers' of the Indian National Congress (INC) that a new leaf was turned which enabled the All-India Muslim League (AIML) to emerge in Dacca in 1906.3 The pre-First World War years saw increased political act ivism in the subcontinent when both the Congress and the Muslim League started a new phase in their political career. Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah joined the League at a time when the reforms of 1909 had already been promulgated and the partition of Bengal had been annulled by the British - who also transferred the capital from Calcutta to Delhi.4 In the wake ofthe Balkan wars, pan-Islamism had already caused a stir among the South Asian Muslims who regarded the Ottoman caliphate as the last symbolic vestige of waning Muslim glory. -
GHOSH, DURBA. Gentlemanly Terrorists. Political Violence and The
548 Book Reviews GHOSH,DURBA. Gentlemanly Terrorists. Political Violence and the Colonial State in India, 1919–1947. [Critical Perspectives on Empire.] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017. xv, 275 pp. Ill. £69.99. (Paper: £23.99; E-book $24.00). Durba Ghoshʼs book Gentlemanly Terrorists complements other recent histories that make a concerted attempt to highlight the place of militant political actors in the Indian freedom movement and to de-centre Gandhian/non-violent politics as the be all and end all of the anti-colonial struggle.1 As the title implies, with its reference to a gentlemanly (bhadralok) class of offenders, Ghosh deals with the history of Bengali militancy especially around 1920 to the late 1930s. But unlike other recent histories, the author does not focus on the revolutionaries them- selves (or their international connections and sojourns), but rather on the administrative machine designed to tackle the threat they represented. Specifically, she traces the expansion of a system of repressive laws that suspended civil rights for those suspected of sedition, and the associated growth of a specialized system of detention facilities. Four particular deten- tion camps, and especially the camp at Deoli, are closely examined in the second half of the study. Through this empirical account, the author makes a paradigmatic case about the “state of exception” that lurks at the core of the modern state – and that casts a long shadow over postcolonial India with its myriad repressive and pre-emptive laws that bear a close resemblance to the colonial-era ordinances and regulations she explores here (pp. 252–256). -
L[Ndlian National Congress 1936· 31
l[ndlian National Congress 1936· 31 I BEING THE RESOLUTIONS PASSED BY THE CONGRESS, THE ALL INDIA CONGRESS COMMITTEE AND THE WORKING COMMITTEE DURING THE PERIOD BETWEE..~ APRIL, 1936 TO JANUARY, 1938 Pl!bli~hed by J. B. Kripalani, General Secretary, All India Congress Committee, Su·.uaj Bhau·an, Allahabad CONTENTS PAGES All India Congress Committee· Meetings .. 1-2.0 \\'orking Committee Meetings •. u-84 Annual Sessions 85-98 Index .. 99-105 / (ALL INDIA CONGRESS COMMITIEE MEETING Bomba)', August 22 tma 23, 1936 \ _I SuMMARY OF Pllocnorncs FIRST DAY'S PROCEEDINGS The following two condolence resolutions were moved from the Chair and passed, all standing. 1. DR. M. A. ANSAIU This Committee records its sense of irreparable loss to ' the national cause by the sudden and premature death of Dr. M. A. Ansari, a dear and nlued comrade, and tenders to the bereaved family its sincere sympathy and condolence. 2. SHRI ABBAS TYABJI The Committee records its heartfelt sorrow over the pssing away of Shri Abbu Tyabji, the Grand Old Man of Gujrat, l:hose services and brave sacrifices endeared him to the nation, and tenders its sincere condolence to Mrs. Tyabji and other members of the family. N. W.F.P. The following resolutions were also moved from the Chair and passed: 1. KH.o\N ABDt:L GHAFF All KHAN "The Committee expresses its indignation at the orden of the Government concerned prohibitin"g Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khln from entering into or remaining in the N. ~7 • F. P. and the Punjab and notes "''ith regret the continuation cf their policy of surrression of civil liberty of individuals eng2ged in national acti\'ities. -
History 2021
History (2-minute series) January 2021 - April 2021 Visit our website www.sleepyclasses.com or our YouTube channel for entire GS Course FREE of cost Also Available: Prelims Crash Course || Prelims Test Series T.me/SleepyClasses Table of Contents 1. Nagpur Session (1920) of the Indian National Congress ...................................1 2. 5 Important Things about Lord Curzon 1 3. The Red Fort ............................................2 4. Kalighat paintings ..................................5 5. Kangra School of Painting ....................6 6. The Rajasthani Schools of Painting ...7 7. Rogan School of Art ...............................9 8. Lala Lajpat Rai ........................................10 9. Shaheed Bhagat Singh ..........................12 10.Pathrughat Peasant Uprising ..............15 11.Gyanvapi Mosque ..................................16 12.Dr. B.R. AMBEDKAR ..............................17 13.Rabindranath Tagore ............................20 Note: The YouTube links for all the topics are embedded in the name of the Topic itself www.sleepyclasses.com Call 6280133177 T.me/SleepyClasses 1. Nagpur Session (1920) of the Indian National Congress December 1920 At the Nagpur session of the Indian National Congress • The programme of non-cooperation was endorsed. • An important change was made in the Congress creed: now, instead of having the attainment of self- government through constitutional means as its goal, the Congress decided to have the attainment of Swaraj through peaceful and legitimate means, thus committing itself to an extraconstitutional mass struggle. • Some important organizational changes were made: ✓ a Congress Working Committee (CWC) of 15 members was set up to lead the Congress from now onwards; ✓ Provincial Congress Committees on linguistic basis were organized; ✓ Ward Committees was organized; and entry fee was reduced to four annas. • Gandhiji declared that if the non-cooperation programme was implemented completely, swaraj would be ushered in within a year. -
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre drishtiias.com/printpdf/jallianwala-bagh-massacre (This editorial is based on the article 'Deep Regret is Simply Not Good Enough' which appeared in 'The Hindu' on 12th April, 2019. The article talks about Jallianwala Bagh Massacre which will soon be completing 100 years of its occurrence.) Jallianwala Bagh’s importance lies not in the numbers killed but in what preceded it and in what followed. The Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919, better known as the Rowlatt Act, came into force a month before the massacre in Jallianwala Bagh. It shocked most Indians who had expected to be rewarded, not punished, for willingly fighting alongside the British in the First World War. A long due formal British apology came on the occasion of the centenary of the horrific Jallianwala Bagh massacre, but the question however remains - Is It Enough? Run up to the event During World War I (1914–18) the British government of India enacted a series of repressive emergency powers that were intended to combat subversive activities. By the war’s end, expectations were high among the Indian populace that those measures would be eased and that India would be given more political autonomy. The Montagu-Chelmsford Report, presented to the British Parliament in 1918, did in fact recommend limited local self-government. Instead, however, the government of India passed what became known as the Rowlatt Acts in early 1919, which essentially extended the repressive wartime measures. The acts were met by widespread anger and discontent among Indians, notably in the Punjab region. Gandhi in early April called for a one-day general strike throughout the country. -
Major Civilizations of the World Include S Indhu S Araswati, Vedic, Egyptian, Babylonian, Chinese, Roman and Greek Civilizations
1 Chapter - 1 M ajor Civilizations of the Wor l d 1.0 Aim 1.1 Preface 1.2 Origin of Man and Development . 1.2.1 Questions for Exercise 1.3. Sindhu Saraswati Civilization 1.3.1 Saraswati River 1.3.2 Indus Architecture 1. Town Planning 2. Great Bath and Great Grannary 3. Great Reservoir and Stadium 4. Great Dockyard. 1.3.3 Other Arts of Indus. Saraswati Civilization 1.3.4 Indus Script 1.3.5 Science 1.3.6 Economic Life. 1.3.7 Social Life 1.3.8 Religious life 1.3.9 Political Life 1.3.10 Cremation of the Dead 1.3.11 Questions for Exercise 1.4. Vedic Civilization 1. 4 .1 Language and Literary Richness 1.4.2 Political System 1.4.3 Social Life 1.4.4 Economic Life 1.4.5 Religious Life 1.4.6 Knowledge and Science 1.4.7 Questions for Exercise. 1.5. Ancient Civilization of Egypt 1.5.1 Political System 1.5.2 Social Condition 1.5.3 Economic Condition 1.5.4 Religious Life 1.5.5 Art 1.5.6 Knowledge and Science 1.5.7 Questions for Exercise 1.6 Ancient Babylonian Civilization 1.6.1 Political System - (1) Administration (2) Law (3) Judicial System 1.6.2 Social condition 1.6.3 Religious Life 1.6.4 Economic Condition 1.6.5 Art 1.6.6 Knowledge and Science 1.6.7 Questions for Exercise 1.7. Chinese Civilization 1.7.1 Royal Dynasties of China 1.7.2 Administrative System 1.7.3 Social Life. -
Closing Ranks - All India 2018 (R1, R2 Final) for General Category
Closing ranks - All India 2018 (R1, R2 Final) For General Category Page 2 to 7 - Course Wise Closing ranks Page 8 to 126 - Course wise College wise closing ranks AIQ All India Quota AMU Aligarh Muslim University's Institutional Quota (only for AMU students) BHU Banaras Hindu University's Institutional Quota (only for BHU students) DU Delhi University's Institutional Quota (only for DU students) JM Jain Minority (1 institute) - SKBS - Vadodara MM Muslim Minority (2 institutes) - Yenepoya, Mangalore & Hamard, Delhi MNG Deemed universities NRI NRI Quota under Deemed Universities Any mista k es write to [email protected] Updated or corrected version if any will be available at https://goo.gl/ZLHpGc For any queries follow on quora @ https://www.quora.com/profile/Ashok-Paskalraj Follow on rxpg @ashoksang http://www.rxpgonline.com/threads442949.html Closing ranks - All India 2018 For General Category Course wise closing Ranks 2018 - Closing Ranks Wise for (All India Quota / Delhi Univ. / Deemed etc.) General Category Only Please see Page 1 for classification of AIQ, MGM etc. (All Ranks are NEET PG Ranks - released on Feb 15th 2018) - Zero => No seat Final No : of Allotted Quota (GN) Course Equivalent R1 Clos. Closing Seats Final AIQ M.D. Radio Diagnosis 1583 1833 191 AIQ M.D. D.V.L 2555 2555 113 AIQ M.D. (FAMILY MEDICINE) 3181 3181 1 AIQ M.D. General Medicine 3824 3960 657 AIQ D.M.R.D 3895 4116 43 AIQ M.D. Paediatrics 4107 4205 343 AIQ M.D. GERIATRICS 3254 4693 2 AIQ M.S. Orthopaedics 4439 4703 292 AIQ M.D. -
1. Letter to Indira Nehru 2. Notes
1. LETTER TO INDIRA NEHRU [After October 15, 1939]1 CHI. INDU, You must have now lost the habit of writing Hindi. But I must write, mustn’t I, in the rashtrabhasha ? Have you gone there for studies or for falling ill? How did you contract pleurisy? I have suffered the pangs of pleurisy. May God restore you soon to health. Blessings from BAPU From a photostat of the Hindi: C. W. 9805. Courtesy: Nehru Memorial Museum and Library 2. NOTES A POSER A Britisher has written to Deenabandhu Andrews a letter on the war expounding his own views. He is an ardent pacifist. Deenabandhu has shared the letter with me. In it occur the following paragraphs: For India too I think that this is a very critical time. The danger I see is that Britain may promise full Dominion Status or something of the kind, and as a result India will raise an army and become one more military-minded nation. Her witness for the way of non-violence and soul-force would then be largely discounted. How can Gandhiji as a believer in non-violence ask for clarification of war aims with a view to getting India’s support for Britain in this way of war? The only thing that he can do and that we should all be doing is to build up an army of men and women who are committed to the way of love and forgiveness and to receive but never to return violence. We have to work this out to see how it will alter our daily life as well as all our thinking and acting towards other communities and nations.