DOCSLIB.ORG

Piedmont Ecoregion Aquatic Habitats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Piedmont Ecoregion Aquatic Habitats Piedmont Ecoregion Aquatic Habitats Description and Location The piedmont ecoregion extends south of Blue Ridge to the fall line near Columbia, South Carolina and from the Savannah River east to the Pee Dee River. Encompassing 24 counties and 10,788 square miles, the piedmont is the largest physiographic province in South Carolina. The piedmont is an area with gently rolling hills dissected by narrow stream and river valleys. Forests, farms and orchards Pee Dee-Piedmont EDU dominate most of the land. Elevations Santee-Piedmont EDU Savannah-Piedmont EDU range from 375 to 1,000 feet. The Piedmont Ecoregion cuts across the top of three major South Carolina drainages, the Savannah, the Santee and the Pee Dee, forming three ecobasins: the Savannah-Piedmont, Santee-Piedmont and Pee Dee-Piedmont. Savannah-Piedmont Ecobasin The Savannah River drainage originates in the mountains of North Carolina and Georgia. The Savannah River flows southeast along the border of South Carolina and Georgia through the piedmont for approximately 131 miles on its way to the Atlantic Ocean. Major tributaries to the Savannah River in the South Carolina portion of this ecobasin include the Tugaloo River, Seneca River, Chauga River, Rocky River, Little River and Stevens Creek. The ecobasin encompasses 36 watersheds and approximately 2,879 square miles. The vast majority of the land is privately owned with only 239 square miles protected by federal, state and private entities. Most of the protected land (192 square miles) occurs in Sumter National Forest. The ecobasin contains 3,328 miles of lotic habitat with 143 square miles of impoundments. Most of the impounded water occurs in four large reservoirs, Lake Keowee (17,010 acres), and the South Carolina portions of Lake Hartwell (35,187 acres), Lake Russell (15,207 acres) and Thurmond Reservoir (21,297 acres). Primary conservation targets within the ecobasin include the Stevens Creek watershed in Greenwood and McCormick Counties, the Turkey Creek watershed in Edgefield County and the mainstem Savannah River in Edgefield and Aiken Counties (Smith et al. 2000). The Stevens Creek and Turkey Creek watersheds are home to several mussels on South Carolina’s Priority Species List including the brook floater, yellow lampmussel, creeper and the federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter. At least 13 priority fish species are also found in this ecobasin, including the Christmas darter, redeye bass, Savannah darter and turquoise darter. The mainstem of the Savannah River in Edgefield and Aiken Counties is home to the robust redhorse and federally endangered shortnose sturgeon as well as several other priority fish species. Several priority mussel species (barrel floater, pod lance, Roanoke slabshell, yellow lampmussel, reyed pink fatmucket and Savannah lilliput) are also found in the mainstem Savannah River. Santee-Piedmont Ecobasin The upper Santee River drainage originates mostly in the south central piedmont of North Carolina, but receives some input from the mountains of South Carolina and North Carolina through the Saluda and Catawba River systems, respectively. The Broad River and Catawba- Wateree Rivers are the dominant rivers in this ecobasin. The Broad River flows nearly directly south from North Carolina to Columbia, South Carolina where it merges with the Saluda River at the fall line to form the Congaree River. As the Broad River flows south, it picks up inputs from the Pacolet River, Tyger River and Enoree River along the western portion of the drainage and Kings Creek, Turkey Creek, Sandy River and Cedar Creek from the eastern portion of the drainage. The Catawba River originates on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge in North Carolina and flows through the inner piedmont and Charlotte, North Carolina before entering South Carolina. The Catawba flows south through South Carolina until it is impounded to form Lake Wateree and thereafter is known as the Wateree River. The Wateree River continues to flow south through the southeastern plains until it merges with the Congaree River to from the Santee River. The Santee-Piedmont Ecobasin is the largest in the state, containing part or all of 84 watersheds and encompassing 7,604 square miles. The ecobasin contains approximately 7,161 miles of stream habitat and nearly 160 square miles of impoundments. Most of the impounded area (127 square miles) is the result of five large reservoirs, including Lake Greenwood (9,957 acres) and Lake Murray (48,417 acres) on the Saluda River, Monticello Reservoir (6,644 acres) on the Broad River, and Lake Wylie (5,067 acres) and Wateree Lake (11,386 acres) on the Catawba- Wateree River. Most land in the ecobasin is privately owned with only 298 square miles protected by state, federal and private entities. Most of the protected land (251 square miles) occurs in the Sumter National Forest. Other significant protected areas include the Croft State Natural Area (10.7 square miles), Kings Mountain State Park (9.6 square miles) and the Kings Mountain National Military Park (6.0 square miles). The Santee-Piedmont Ecobasin contains several areas of conservation priority (Smith et al. 2000). Conservation targets that contain rare, threatened and endemic species include: the Saluda River headwaters, which encompass the North Saluda River, South Saluda River and Oolenoy River watersheds located in the inner piedmont of Greenville and Pickens Counties; the Clouds Creek watershed in the Slate Belt ecoregion in Saluda County; the mainstem of the Broad River from the North Carolina line to Parr Shoals Reservoir in South Carolina; the Kings Creek watershed and the Clarks Fork system in the Bullocks Creek watershed located primarily in the Kings Mountain ecoregion in Cherokee and York Counties; the Sixmile Creek and Waxhaw Creek systems in the Twelvemile Creek watershed in Lancaster County; the Gills Creek system in the Camp Creek watershed in Lancaster County; and the Wateree Creek watershed in Richland County. The Saluda River headwaters contain populations of at least 13 priority fish species including redeye bass, turquoise darter and fantail darter. The Clouds Creek watershed contains populations of at least five priority fish species including the Saluda darter as well as at least one priority mussel species (Savannah lilliput). The mainstem of the Broad River contains at least 17 priority fish species including several catostomids (notchlip redhorse, V-lip redhorse, quillback and highfin carpsucker) and percids (seagreen darter, fantail darter and Piedmont darter). The Kings Creek watershed and Clarks Fork system contain at least nine priority fish species including the fantail darter, the seagreen darter and the piedmont darter. The Sixmile Creek and Waxhaw Creek systems contain several priority mussel species including the notched rainbow, Carolina creekshell and the federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter. The Gills Creek system also contains Carolina creekshell and Carolina heelsplitter. The Wateree Creek watershed contains several priority fish species including the Carolina darter, the Piedmont darter and the seagreen darter. Pee Dee-Piedmont Ecobasin The South Carolina piedmont portion of the Pee Dee drainage originates just across the state line in North Carolina. The Pee Dee–Piedmont Ecobasin is the second smallest ecobasin in the state, encompassing only 276 square miles. Tributaries to the Pee Dee River included in the ecobasin are Lynches River and Thompson Creek. There are approximately 468 miles of stream habitat within the ecobasin and only 337 acres of impounded water. The only two protected areas are Forty Acre Rock Heritage Preserve (1,584 acres) and the Hanging Rock Battleground property (251 acres). The majority of the ecobasin is a primary conservation target, including the Lynches River, Flat Creek and Little Lynches River systems in the upper Lynches River basin located in Lancaster and Chesterfield Counties as well as the Thompson Creek system in the upper Pee Dee basin in Chesterfield County. Several priority fish species occur in the upper Lynches River basin, including the “thinlip” chub, Sandhills chub, and “broadtail” madtom. In addition to those fish species several priority mussel species populate the basin including, the brook floater, creeper, notched rainbow and federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter. The Thompson Creek system contains several priority fish species (“thinlip”chub, Sandhills chub, fantail darter and Piedmont darter) as well as several species whose populations in South Carolina are entirely restricted to that system, including the satinfin shiner, redlip shiner and comely shiner. General Condition As of 1990, forests and farms dominated the land cover in the Piedmont Ecoregion. However, the vast majority of piedmont forests were cleared at some point during the last two centuries to develop crop and pasture lands. Most piedmont streams are now heavily silted due to the agricultural development of the piedmont’s modest slopes and highly erodible soils. Forested Agriculture Barren Developed Forest Wetland Scrub Water Protected Savannah 477.76 24.33 112.52 1,693.92 1.30 421.86 147.43 8.31% 16.59% 0.85% 3.91% 58.83% 0.05% 14.65% 5.12% Santee 1,060.22 39.25 543.93 5,133.38 6.00 641.15 191.19 3.91% 13.92% 0.52% 7.14% 67.41% 0.08% 8.42% 2.51% Pee Dee 69.77 2.12 2.40 184.05 1.64 15.05 0.77 1.1% 25.30% 0.77% 0.87% 66.73% 0.59% 5.46% 0.28% Total area 1,607.75 65.70 658.85 7,011.35 8.94 1,078.06 339.39 5.01% 14.93% 0.61% 6.12% 65.10% 0.08% 10.01% 3.15% Savannah-Piedmont Ecobasin Water quality in this ecobasin was designated as impaired at 65 of 138 sites (47 percent) sampled by SCDHEC (SCDHEC 2003). Recreational uses were not supported at 30 sites due to the presence of fecal coliform bacteria. Aquatic life uses were not supported at 28 sites due to copper contamination, paucity of aquatic fauna, low dissolved oxygen concentrations or abnormal pH values.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chaelundi National Park and Chaelundi State Conservation Area
    CHAELUNDI NATIONAL PARK AND CHAELUNDI STATE CONSERVATION AREA PLAN OF MANAGEMENT NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Part of the Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW May 2009 This plan of management was adopted by the Minister for Climate Change and the Environment on 29th May 2009. Acknowledgments The plan of management is based on a draft plan prepared by staff of the North Coast Region of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) with the assistance of staff from other sections and divisions in the Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC). Valuable information and comments provided by DECC specialists, the Regional Advisory Committee, and members of the public who participated in consultation workshops or contributed to the planning process in any way are gratefully acknowledged. The NPWS acknowledges that these parks are within the traditional country of the Gumbaynggirr Aboriginal people. Cover photographs by Aaron Harber, NPWS. Inquiries about these parks or this plan of management should be directed to the Ranger at the NPWS Dorrigo Plateau Area Office, Rainforest Centre, Dorrigo National Park, Dome Road, Dorrigo NSW 2453 or by telephone on (02) 6657 2309. © Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 2009. ISBN 978 1 74232 382 4 DECC 2009/512 FOREWORD Chaelundi National Park and Chaelundi State Conservation Area are located approximately 45 kilometres south west of Grafton and 10 kilometres west of Nymboida in northern NSW. Together the parks cover an area of approximately 20,796 hectares. Chaelundi National Park and State Conservation Area protect the old growth forest communities and other important habitat, and plants and animals of high conservation value, including endangered species and the regionally significant brush-tailed rock wallaby.
    [Show full text]
  • By Michael G. Zalants Water-Resources Investigations
    LOW-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF NATURAL STREAMS IN THE BLUE RIDGE, PIEDMONT, AND UPPER COASTAL PLAIN PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF SOUTH CAROLINA By Michael G. Zalants U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4188 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL Columbia, South Carolina 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUGAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports 720 Gracern Road Feoteral Center, Bldg. 810 Stephenson Center, Suite 129 Box| 25425 Columbia, South Carolina 29210 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ............................................... 2 Previous studies ................................................ 2 Description of the study area ................................... 3 Streamflow data compilation .......................................... 3 Continuous-record stations ...................................... 3 Partial-record stations ......................................... 6 Low-flow characteristics ............................................. 7 Continuous-record stations ...................................... 7 Partial-record stations ......................................... 8 Ungaged
    [Show full text]
  • Koala Conservation Status in New South Wales Biolink Koala Conservation Review
    koala conservation status in new south wales Biolink koala conservation review Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 6 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE NSW POPULATION .............................................................. 6 Current distribution ............................................................................................................... 6 Size of NSW koala population .............................................................................................. 8 4. INFORMING CHANGES TO POPULATION ESTIMATES ....................................... 12 Bionet Records and Published Reports ............................................................................... 15 Methods – Bionet records ............................................................................................... 15 Methods – available reports ............................................................................................ 15 Results ............................................................................................................................ 16 The 2019 Fires .................................................................................................................... 22 Methods .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bindarri National Park and State Conservation Area Fire Management Strategy
    North Coast Region Index Locality Risk Management Information Bushfire Suppression Sheas Nob SF Byrnes Scrub NR 488000m.E 89 490 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 498000m.E Bindarri National Park and State Chaelundi NP Sherwood NR Coffs Coast RP vv Mound Of Stones Bel MOLETON MOONEE BEACH la Sp Mo Conglomerate SF Wedding Bells SF ur Rd r Cemetery to Conservation Area 25k mapsheet 25k mapsheet v n Helipad Information s Nymboi-Binderay NP R 94371S 95374S Woolgoolga d Fire Management Strategy (Type 2) Kangaroo River SF (! Name Easting Northing Lat_DMS Long_DMSv N v N vvv ! ! ! Clouds Creek SF Potential Helipad 1 491005 6648654 30d 17m 37v S 152d 54m 23s E 2005 000m. Potential Helipad 2 490404 6652197 30d 15m 42 S 152d 54m 01s E ! ! ! ! 000m. 57 v ! ! 57 66 Bagawa SF Northern HMZ 66 Potential Helipad 3 495401 6652185 30d 15m 43 S 152d 57m 08s E Sheet 1 of 1 v ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Fire Hut FL1 L Lower Bucca SF Dry Creek HMZ v o FL2 This strategy should be used in conjunction with aerial photography and field reconnaissance w FL2 a Wild Cattle Creek SF n ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Langleys Rd HMZ n Moonee Beach NR a during incidents and the development of incident action plans. Coramba NR v R FL2 FL2 d ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Moonpar SF Nana Creek SF L These data are not guaranteed to be free from error or omission. The NSW National Parks and Wildlife and its employees a Mirum Creek HMZ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n FL2 v g Nymboi-Binderay SCA le disclaim liability for any act done on the information in the data and any consequences of such acts or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Need for New Reserves
    Koala Strategy Submissions, PO Box A290, Sydney South NSW 1232, [email protected] CC. [email protected] 2nd March 2017. NPA SUBMISSION: WHOLE OF GOVERNMENT KOALA STRATEGY; SAVING OUR SPECIES DRAFT STRATEGY AND REVIEW OF STATE ENVIRONMENT PLANNING POLICY 44—KOALA HABITAT PROTECTION Introduction The National Parks Association of NSW (NPA), established in 1957, is a community-based organisation with over 20,000 supporters from rural, remote and urban areas across the state. NPA promotes nature conservation and evidence- based natural resource management. We have a particular interest in the protection of the State’s biodiversity and supporting ecological processes, both within and outside of the formal conservation reserve system. NPA has a long history of engagement with both government and non-government organisations on issues of park management. NPA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the whole of government koala strategy (the strategy), the Saving Our Species iconic koala project (the SOS project) and the Explanation of intended effect: State Environment and Planning Policy 44 (Koala Habitat Protection) (SEPP 44). Please note, NPA made a submission on SEPP 44 in late 2016 prior to the deadline being extended which we have reattached at the end of this document (Appendix 1). NPA was also consulted on the SOS programme in August 2016, which we greatly appreciated. We provided OEH with feedback on the programme at that time, which also contained an exploration of issues facing koalas, which we have reattached in Appendix 2. NPA has had significant input to the development of the Stand Up For Nature (SUFN) submission to this consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Cyclists Mountain Bikes on the BNT
    Notes for Cyclists Mountain Bikes on the BNT Please note: This information is for those intending to take mountain bikes out on the Bicentennial National Trail and offers suggestions for cyclists to avoid those sections of the Trail unsuitable for bikes. The information provided here is of a general nature and should be read in conjunction with the Guidebooks, Guidebook updates and road maps. Cyclists should always check back on the website for the most recent information on Trail conditions. A friendly reminder that all Trail users are self reliant trekkers responsible for all your needs and the decisions you make. Just like the Trail, this information sheet is an ongoing work in progress - users of these notes, and the Trail, are invited to offer their own opinions and suggestions for updating this information. The best parts of the National Trail for walkers and trekkers with animals are the rugged sections through wilderness. The Trail has been designed to provide a balance between these rugged remote areas and easier more accessible parts along quiet roads and tracks through the countryside. For cyclists, unless you are especially masochistic, you will find it necessary to detour around the particularly difficult sections. Bypassing sections of the BNT unsuitable for bikes usually involves public roads, mostly quiet back roads, so landowner permission for access is not a problem. As the detours are generally close to the BNT, the spirit of the BNT concept is not lost. However, this has left some cyclists with the impression that the Bicentennial National Trail is much less challenging than it really is.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic South Carolina Floods of October 1–5, 2015
    Service Assessment The Historic South Carolina Floods of October 1–5, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover Photograph: Road Washout at Jackson Creek in Columbia, SC, 2015 Source: WIS TV Columbia, SC ii Service Assessment The Historic South Carolina Floods of October 1–5, 2015 July 2016 National Weather Service John D. Murphy Chief Operating Officer iii Preface The combination of a surface low-pressure system located along a stationary frontal boundary off the U.S. Southeast coast, a slow moving upper low to the west, and a persistent plume of tropical moisture associated with Hurricane Joaquin resulted in record rainfall over portions of South Carolina, October 1–5, 2015. Some areas experienced more than 20 inches of rainfall over the 5-day period. Many locations recorded rainfall rates of 2 inches per hour. This rainfall occurred over urban areas where runoff rates are high and on grounds already wet from recent rains. Widespread, heavy rainfall caused major flooding in areas from the central part of South Carolina to the coast. The historic rainfall resulted in moderate to major river flooding across South Carolina with at least 20 locations exceeding the established flood stages. Flooding from this event resulted in 19 fatalities. Nine of these fatalities occurred in Richland County, which includes the main urban center of Columbia. South Carolina State Officials said damage losses were $1.492 billion. Because of the significant impacts of the event, the National Weather Service formed a service assessment team to evaluate its performance before and during the record flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Topographic Map Catalogue 2008
    ° 152 153° Y 154° 28° Z AA BB QUEENSLAND 28° Coolangatta SPRING- CURRU- TWEED HEAD WARWICK BROOK MBIN SFingal Head AMG / MGA ZONE 55 AMG /MGA ZONE 56 MT LINDESAY MURWILLUMBAH 9641-4S 9341 Terranora TWEED HEADS KILLAR- WILSON M 9441 LAM- TYAL- S MOUNT OUNT PALEN 9541Tumbulgum Kingscliff 151° NEY PEAK LINDE- COUGAL INGTON GUM MURWILLUMBAH 9641 ° ° CLUNIE CREEK CUDGEN 149 150 KOREELAH N P SAY TYALGUMChillingham9541-2N Condong Bogangar Woodenbong 96 Legume BORDER RANGES 9541-3-N I 41-3N N P Old Hastings Point S EungellaTWEEDI ELBOW VALLEY KOREE TOOLOOM Grevillia MOOBALL NP V LAH I T WOOD MT. WARNING U N P ENBONG Uki Pottsville Beach G W 9341-3-S REVILLIA BRAYS N P 9341-2-S CREEK 9441 BURRINGB I POTTSVIL X -3-S AI R LE 9441-2-S Mount I Grevillia 9541-3S 9541-2 Mooball Goondiwindi Urbenville Lion S 9641-3S TOONUMBAR N P MEBBIN N P MOUNT I MARYLAND Kunghur JERUSALEM N P Wiangaree I N P WYLIE CREEK TOOLOOM NIGHTCAP Ocean Shores GRADULE BOOMI CAPEEN AFTERLE Mullumbimby BOGGABILLA YELARBO 9340-4-N 9340 E NIMBIN N P I 8740-N I N -1-N 9440-4-N HUONBROOK BRUNSWICK 8840-N 9440-1-N I 8940-N 9040-N 9540-4N Nimbin 9540-1NBYRON I Toonumbar I HEA Liston Tooloom GOONENGERRY NP DS I Rivertree Old Bonalbo RICHMOND KYOGLE Cawongla I 9640-4N Kyogle I Boomi I LISTON RANGE N P PADDYS FLATYABBRA BONALBO LISMORERosebank Federal ETTRIC I Byron Bay GO I N P K ONDIWINDI YETMAN 9340-4-S 9340-1-S LARNOOK The D BYRON BAY S R A TEXAS 9440-4-S UNOON BI YRI ON BA STANTHORP Paddys Flat 9440-1-S Cedar 9540 Channon I Y 8940 I E DRAKE -4S 9540-1S Suffolk Park 9040 BON Dryaaba
    [Show full text]
  • Coffs Coast Regional
    TO GLEN TO NYMBOIDA TO McPHERSONS TO GRAFTON INNES 28km ABCDE3km CROSSING 26km FTO GRAFTON 36km 41km G YURAYGIR HORTONS NAT PK CK NAT N WARRA 152º50'E Red Rock 152º10'E 153º10'E 151º50'E 152º00'E 153º00'E 152º20'E 152º30'E 152º40'E NAT PK (locality) RES o TOURIST DRIVE 19 rt Kookabookra h YARRAWARRA CHAELUNDI KA 30º00'S SHEAS NG ABORIGINAL 1 RED ROCK STATE FOREST 996 CHAELUNDI AR GUY FAWKES NOB SF 803 O CULTURAL CENTRE NATIONAL O HOLIDAY PARK Ben Lomond PARK RIVER k k e Towallum e e r e P Y r R Corindi Beach A C D IV C E Glenreagh SHERWOOD CORINDI BEACH R R W Fawkes BYRNES NAT RES H HOLIDAY PARK CLOUDS CREEK SCRUB Upper G LLANGOTHLIN I 10 O Corindi RD NAT RES H For detail see Map 8 N R LAKE The T Chaelundi Ck a E (locality) A MARENGO A Arrawarra Platypus are found in most RD l R W R Rest Area Junction l SF 318 a A Backwater K pools along the river 4WD beach access 12 LITTLE R w 1 O E KANGAROO Coast 1 u WEDDING LLANGOTHLIN O V B um I d BELLS Mullaway A s j NAT RES s R a K po RIVER CONGLOMERATE O h Woolgoolga Beach O Clouds Creek 12 O CHAELUNDI RD 4WD beach access K River an ST CONS Railway b NYMBOI - BINDERAY Railway Oban O SF 21 SF 349 For detail Woolgoolga AREA NATIONAL PARK GENTLE ANNIE see Map 3 s SF 111 d Little FOREST WAY n a Ma ELLIS SF 831 N uc l Riv re Misty Creek O B ca SOLITARY w er n T RD o g Lookout Vista Point F Cod Hole N o Woolgoolga ISLANDS Llangothlin MIST A Bucca Wards Mistake R A N Nana Glen Creek Picnic AKE Marengo Falls G y Hearnes Lake (locality) D m BAGAWA SF 30 13 Area NATIONAL I R Lower b WILD I S O V o Bucca Sandy Beach GARA D Ck i MT E For detail B d R CATTLE BUSHMANS R Sandy Beach A PARK HYLAND M a RD see Map 9 W CREEK Moleton SF NAT RES Y 11 Fiddamans Beach 318 N SF 488 LOWER M Billys Creek Platypus SF Emerald Beach 30º10'S A BUCCA le T 11 oy R Flat 536 Look at Me Now f 10 r DR e E S Headland b SF 29 E A N R A R 5 k G N Ck O MOONEE BEACH e O FO G R E F e 23 EST MOTHER OF DUCKS r Dundarrabin NATURE RESERVE P Norman Jolly R.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Habitat Plan for American Shad
    SOUTH CAROLINA HABITAT PLAN FOR AMERICAN SHAD South Carolina Department of Natural Resources April 2021 Approved May 5, 2021 Introduction: The purpose of this Habitat Plan is to briefly document existing conditions in rivers with American shad runs, identify potential threats, and propose action to mitigate such threats. American shad (Alosa sapidissima) are found in at least 19 rivers of South Carolina (Waccamaw, Great Pee Dee, Little Pee Dee, Lynches, Black, Sampit, Bull Creek, Santee, Cooper, Wateree, Congaree, Broad, Wando, Ashley, Ashepoo, Combahee, Edisto, Coosawhatchie, and Savannah Rivers). Many have historically supported a commercial fishery, a recreational fishery, or both. Currently, commercial fisheries exist in Winyah Bay, Waccamaw, Pee Dee, Black, Santee, Edisto, Combahee, and Savannah Rivers, while the Sampit, Ashepoo, Ashley, and Cooper rivers no longer support commercial fisheries. With the closure of the ocean-intercept fishery beginning in 2005, the Santee River and Winyah Bay complex comprise the largest commercial shad fisheries in South Carolina. Recreational fisheries still exist in the Cooper, Savannah, Edisto, and Combahee Rivers, as well as the Santee River Rediversion Canal. For the purposes of this plan, systems have been identified which, in some cases, include several rivers. Only river systems with active shad runs were included in this plan, these include the Pee Dee River run in the Winyah Bay System (primarily the Waccamaw and Great Pee Dee Rivers), the Santee-Cooper system (Santee and Cooper Rivers with the inclusion of Lakes Moultrie and Marion), and the ACE Basin (Edisto and Combahee Rivers) (Figure 1). A joint plan with Georgia was submitted and approved for the Savannah River.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Newberry County, South Carolina
    United States In cooperation with Department of United States Department Agriculture of Agriculture, Forest Soil Survey of Service; South Carolina Natural Department of Natural Newberry Resources Resources, Land, Water Conservation and Conservation Division; Service and South Carolina County, Agricultural Experiment Station South Carolina How To Use This Soil Survey The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and go to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Go to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. iii National Cooperative Soil Survey This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service; the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Land, Water and Conservation Division; and the South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Iv. Natural Resources Element
    PART IV. NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Geography 4-1 Geology 4-2 Climatic Conditions 4-3 Soils 4-4 Drainage Basins 4-6 Flood Plains 4-7 Water Resources 4-8 Forest 4-11 Plants and Wildlife; Rare, Threatened and Endangered 4-15 Rivers and River Related Resources 4-18 Wetlands 4-22 Summary, Observations, Conclusions 4-25 Goals and Strategies 4-27 PART IV. NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT This element of the Comprehensive Plan consists of an inventory and assessment of natural resources, and consideration of their role in the future development of Spartanburg County. Principal among the county’s natural resources are geography, geology, water, soils, floodways, drainage basins, forest, vegetation, wetlands, wildlife, and climatic conditions. A summary assessment of each follows. GEOGRAPHY Spartanburg County is located in the northwestern part of the state, in what has come to be known as the “Piedmont Crescent”. The county lies just southeast of the Blue Ridge Mountains in the piedmont plateau, which is characterized by subdued topographic features and moderate relief. The land surface is inclined to elevations exceeding 1,000 feet in the northwest section of the county to less than 600 feet in the southeast. Hills have a well rounded appearance with no conspicuously prominent ridges or peaks. Valley floors are generally about 100 feet deep with well developed water courses. There are few swamp like areas. The general slope of the county is southeastward, which is the general direction of the main drainageways. The land ranges from nearly level to steep, but most areas are gently sloping to moderately steep.
    [Show full text]