African Mammals (Tracks)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fitzhenry Yields 2016.Pdf
Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii DECLARATION By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za iii GENERAL ABSTRACT Fallow deer (Dama dama), although not native to South Africa, are abundant in the country and could contribute to domestic food security and economic stability. Nonetheless, this wild ungulate remains overlooked as a protein source and no information exists on their production potential and meat quality in South Africa. The aim of this study was thus to determine the carcass characteristics, meat- and offal-yields, and the physical- and chemical-meat quality attributes of wild fallow deer harvested in South Africa. Gender was considered as a main effect when determining carcass characteristics and yields, while both gender and muscle were considered as main effects in the determination of physical and chemical meat quality attributes. Live weights, warm carcass weights and cold carcass weights were higher (p < 0.05) in male fallow deer (47.4 kg, 29.6 kg, 29.2 kg, respectively) compared with females (41.9 kg, 25.2 kg, 24.7 kg, respectively), as well as in pregnant females (47.5 kg, 28.7 kg, 28.2 kg, respectively) compared with non- pregnant females (32.5 kg, 19.7 kg, 19.3 kg, respectively). -
Karoo Large Mammals Check List Note
Karoo Large Mammals Check List Note: Many of the mammals included on this list can only be seen in formal conservation areas such as the National Parks and Provincial Nature Reserves. Mammal Scientific Name Location Date South African hedgehog Erinaceus frontalis Vervet monkey Cercopithecus pygerythrus Chacma baboon Papio ursinus Aardwolf Proteles cristatus Brown hyena Parahyaena brunnea Cape wild cat (African wild cat) Felis lybica Black-footed cat (Small spotted cat) Felis nigripes Caracal Caracal caracal Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus Leopard Panthera pardus Lion Panthera leo Bat-eared fox Otocyon megalotis Cape fox Vulpes chama Blackbacked jackal Canis mesomelas Cape clawless otter Aonyx capensis Striped polecat Ictonyx striatus African striped weasel Poecilogale albinucha Honey badger Mellivora capensis Small-spotted genet Genetta genetta Large-spotted genet Genetta tigrina Water mongoose Atilax paludinosus Cape grey mongoose Galerella pulverulenta Yellow mongoose Cynctis penicillata Small grey mongoose Galerella pulverulenta Suricate (Meerkat) Suricata suricatta Rock dassie (hyrax) Procavia capensis www.karoo-southafrica.com Mammal Scientific Name Location Date Porcupine Hystrix africaeaustralis Ground squirrel Xerus inauris Springhare Pedetes capensis Scrub hare Lepus saxatilis Cape hare Lepus capensis Natal red rock rabbit Pronolagus crassicaudatis Smith’s red rock rabbit Pronolagus rupestris Riverine rabbit Bunolagus monticularis Antbear Orycteropus afer Bushpig Potamochoerus larvatus Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra Burchell’s -
GREVY's ZEBRA Equus Grevyi Swahili Name
Porini Camps Mammal Guide By Rustom Framjee Preface This mammal guide provides some interesting facts about the mammals that are seen by guests staying at Porini Camps. In addition, there are many species of birds and reptiles which are listed separately from this guide. Many visitors are surprised at the wealth of wildlife and how close you can get to the animals without disturbing them. Because the camps operate on a low tourist density basis (one tent per 700 acres) the wildlife is not ‘crowded’ by many vehicles and you can see them in a natural state - hunting, socialising, playing, giving birth and fighting to defend their territories. Some are more difficult to see than others, and some can only be seen when you go on a night drive. All Porini camps are unfenced and located in game rich areas and you will see much wildlife even in and around the camps. The Maasai guides who accompany you on all game drives and walks are very well trained and qualified professional guides. They are passionate and enthusiastic about their land and its wildlife and really want to show you as much as they can. They have a wealth of knowledge and you are encouraged to ask them more about what you see. They know many of the animals individually and can tell you stories about them. If you are particularly interested in something, let them know and they will try to help you see it. While some facts and figures are from some of the references listed, the bulk of information in this guide has come from the knowledge of guides and camp staff. -
Animals Tested for Rabies Virus — Washington State, 1988–2018
Animals Tested for Rabies Virus — Washington State, 1988–2018 Year Bat Cat Dog Ferret Raccoon Skunk Rodent Lagomorph Other Wild Other Domestic Total Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive 1988 69 4 165 110 15 16 3 12 2 5 3 400 4 1989 102 9 124 91 20 9 4 8 1 9 4 372 9 1990 63 4 104 82 5 7 5 5 1 14 4 290 4 1991 90 9 105 96 13 8 3 13 0 19 2 349 9 1992 73 6 132 90 16 14 2 12 0 14 6 1* 359 7 1993 68 1 122 95 8 4 8 16 2 10 13 346 1 1994 58 14 105 90 7 4 3 15 0 16 14 1^ 312 15 1995 263 15 140 114 12 8 1 23 3 15 18 597 15 1996 257 13 104 101 8 9 2 14 3 20 12 530 13 1997 780 51 155 118 7 17 4 15 2 18 11 1,127 51 1998 447 27 126 109 8 11 1 6 0 19 16 743 27 1999 334 25 103 71 3 11 3 8 1 14 13 561 25 2000 330 23 105 60 1 2 4 6 1 9 4 522 23 2001 263 22 111 93 2 3 1 8 0 4 5 490 22 2002 186 12 99 1 53 7 2 2 9 1 8 9 376 13 2003 229 23 137 72 0 11 1 4 1 9 10 474 23 2004 311 20 141 70 3 13 6 11 0 6 10 571 20 2005 245 15 132 66 3 12 2 5 1 10 4 480 15 2006 273 15 105 70 4 13 1 2 1 8 5 482 15 2007 315 22 132 97 1 16 3 5 0 9 3 581 22 2008 337 17 143 76 1 10 2 5 1 9 11 595 17 2009 311 14 133 90 1 12 5 4 1 7 9 573 14 2010 200 14 103 63 0 14 1 6 1 9 10 407 14 2011 204 11 87 51 1 9 1 2 0 8 5 368 11 2012 221 9 98 54 2 7 0 4 0 7 9 402 9 2013 284 12 80 65 0 13 0 3 0 5 9 459 12 2014 276 15 75 53 0 12 0 1 1 6 11 435 15 2015 305 9 95 1 49 0 8 2 8 0 11 7 485 10 2016 298 20 108 44 0 5 0 4 1 3 3 466 20 2017 376 22 81 48 0 8 1 4 0 2 5 525 22 2018 531 40 84 44 0 4 0 2 0 2 8 675 40 2019 255 9 65 23 0 2 0 2 0 3 7 357 9 Total 8,354 522 3,599 2 2,408 0 148 0 294 0 71 0 242 0 25 0 308 0 260 2 15,709 526 Notes Lagomorphs include: rabbit, hare, and pika. -
Which Predators Are Responsible for Faunal
Which predators are responsible for faunal accumulations at the Late Pleistocene layers of El Harhoura 2 Cave (Témara, Morocco)? Emilie Campmas, Patrick Michel, Sandrine Costamagno, Mohamed Abdeljalil El Hajraoui, Roland Nespoulet To cite this version: Emilie Campmas, Patrick Michel, Sandrine Costamagno, Mohamed Abdeljalil El Hajraoui, Roland Nespoulet. Which predators are responsible for faunal accumulations at the Late Pleistocene layers of El Harhoura 2 Cave (Témara, Morocco)?. Comptes Rendus Palevol, Elsevier Masson, 2017, 16 (3), pp.333-350. 10.1016/j.crpv.2016.08.007. hal-01891620 HAL Id: hal-01891620 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01891620 Submitted on 9 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. C. R. Palevol 16 (2017) 333–350 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Comptes Rendus Palevol www.sci encedirect.com General Paleontology, Systematics and Evolution (Vertebrate Palaeontology) Which predators are responsible for faunal accumulations at the Late Pleistocene layers of El Harhoura 2 Cave (Témara, Morocco)? Quels -
University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
UNDERSTANDING CARNIVORAN ECOMORPHOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME, WITH A CASE STUDY DURING THE CAT-GAP OF FLORIDA By SHARON ELIZABETH HOLTE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Sharon Elizabeth Holte To Dr. Larry, thank you ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my family for encouraging me to pursue my interests. They have always believed in me and never doubted that I would reach my goals. I am eternally grateful to my mentors, Dr. Jim Mead and the late Dr. Larry Agenbroad, who have shaped me as a paleontologist and have provided me to the strength and knowledge to continue to grow as a scientist. I would like to thank my colleagues from the Florida Museum of Natural History who provided insight and open discussion on my research. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Aldo Rincon for his help in researching procyonids. I am so grateful to Dr. Anne-Claire Fabre; without her understanding of R and knowledge of 3D morphometrics this project would have been an immense struggle. I would also to thank Rachel Short for the late-night work sessions and discussions. I am extremely grateful to my advisor Dr. David Steadman for his comments, feedback, and guidance through my time here at the University of Florida. I also thank my committee, Dr. Bruce MacFadden, Dr. Jon Bloch, Dr. Elizabeth Screaton, for their feedback and encouragement. I am grateful to the geosciences department at East Tennessee State University, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard for the loans of specimens. -
PDF File Containing Table of Lengths and Thicknesses of Turtle Shells And
Source Species Common name length (cm) thickness (cm) L t TURTLES AMNH 1 Sternotherus odoratus common musk turtle 2.30 0.089 AMNH 2 Clemmys muhlenbergi bug turtle 3.80 0.069 AMNH 3 Chersina angulata Angulate tortoise 3.90 0.050 AMNH 4 Testudo carbonera 6.97 0.130 AMNH 5 Sternotherus oderatus 6.99 0.160 AMNH 6 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 7 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 8 Homopus areolatus Common padloper 7.95 0.100 AMNH 9 Homopus signatus Speckled tortoise 7.98 0.231 AMNH 10 Kinosternon subrabum steinochneri Florida mud turtle 8.90 0.178 AMNH 11 Sternotherus oderatus Common musk turtle 8.98 0.290 AMNH 12 Chelydra serpentina Snapping turtle 8.98 0.076 AMNH 13 Sternotherus oderatus 9.00 0.168 AMNH 14 Hardella thurgi Crowned River Turtle 9.04 0.263 AMNH 15 Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle 9.09 0.231 AMNH 16 Kinosternon subrubrum The Eastern Mud Turtle 9.10 0.253 AMNH 17 Kinixys crosa hinged-back tortoise 9.34 0.160 AMNH 18 Peamobates oculifers 10.17 0.140 AMNH 19 Peammobates oculifera 10.27 0.140 AMNH 20 Kinixys spekii Speke's hinged tortoise 10.30 0.201 AMNH 21 Terrapene ornata ornate box turtle 10.30 0.406 AMNH 22 Terrapene ornata North American box turtle 10.76 0.257 AMNH 23 Geochelone radiata radiated tortoise (Madagascar) 10.80 0.155 AMNH 24 Malaclemys terrapin diamondback terrapin 11.40 0.295 AMNH 25 Malaclemys terrapin Diamondback terrapin 11.58 0.264 AMNH 26 Terrapene carolina eastern box turtle 11.80 0.259 AMNH 27 Chrysemys picta Painted turtle 12.21 0.267 AMNH 28 Chrysemys picta painted turtle 12.70 0.168 AMNH 29 -
Implications for the Conservation of Key Species in the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania
Genetic Patterns in Forest Antelope Populations: Implications for the Conservation of Key Species in the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania Submitted by Andrew Edward Bowkett, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences In September 2012 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. ABSTRACT The field of conservation genetics, in combination with non-invasive sampling, provides a powerful set of tools for investigating the conservation status and natural history of rare species that are otherwise difficult to study. A systematic literature review demonstrated that this is certainly the case for many forest- associated antelope species, which are poorly studied and yet constitute some of the most heavily hunted wildlife in Africa. The aim of the present study was to use non-invasive sampling to investigate genetic patterns in forest antelope populations in the high-biodiversity Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania, within the context of the conservation of these species and the wider ecosystem. Genetic information was derived from faecal samples collected across the Udzungwa landscape and assigned to five antelope species (N = 618, collected 2006-09). Faecal pellet length was measured for a subset of samples but statistical assignment to species by this method proved unreliable. -
Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes During a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa
diversity Article Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes during a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa Beanélri B. Janecke Animal, Wildlife & Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, 205 Nelson Mandela Road, Park West, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa; [email protected]; Tel.: +27-51-401-9030 Abstract: Catenas are undulating hillslopes on a granite geology characterised by different soil types that create an environmental gradient from crest to bottom. The main aim was to determine mammal species (>mongoose) present on one catenal slope and its waterholes and group them by feeding guild and body size. Species richness was highest at waterholes (21 species), followed by midslope (19) and sodic patch (16) on the catena. Small differences observed in species presence between zones and waterholes and between survey periods were not significant (p = 0.5267 and p = 0.9139). In total, 33 species were observed with camera traps: 18 herbivore species, 10 carnivores, two insectivores and three omnivores. Eight small mammal species, two dwarf antelopes, 11 medium, six large and six mega-sized mammals were observed. Some species might not have been recorded because of drought, seasonal movement or because they travelled outside the view of cameras. Mammal presence is determined by food availability and accessibility, space, competition, distance to water, habitat preferences, predators, body size, social behaviour, bound to territories, etc. The variety in body size and feeding guilds possibly indicates a functioning catenal ecosystem. This knowledge can be beneficial in monitoring and conservation of species in the park. Keywords: catena ecosystem; ephemeral mud wallows; habitat use; mammal variety; Skukuza area; Citation: Janecke, B.B. -
Common Duiker
Sylvicapra grimmia – Common Duiker Northern Cape provinces; Skinner & Chimimba 2005), and is substantially greyer in colour compared to the other subspecies, hence the alternate name, Grey Duiker in the Cape (Wilson 2013). Sylvicapra g. caffa is found further north of S. g. grimmia within the KwaZulu-Natal, North West, Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo provinces (Skinner & Chimimba 2005), extending into southern Mozambique and eastern Zimbabwe (Wilson 2013). The sandy-coloured S. g. steinhardti ranges throughout Namibia into Angola, Botswana and marginally into the Northern Cape Province to Port Nolloth (Wilson 2013). While distribution is continuous, there are many cases of intergradation but geographical boundaries between Arno Meintjies forms have not been delineated accurately (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2016). Hence only the species is assessed here. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern National Red List status (2004) Least Concern Assessment Rationale Reasons for change No change Listed as Least Concern as the species is widespread and Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern abundant within the assessment region, with a global total population size in the millions. Although bushmeat TOPS listing (NEMBA) None hunting may cause localised declines, the Common CITES listing None Duiker is resilient and should continue to exist in large numbers over its range. This species is also able to exist Endemic No in agricultural landscapes, providing that the natural peripheral vegetation cover remains intact. It is a key prey The Common Duiker is highly adaptable, elusive species and subpopulations should be sustained by and resilient; they vary from other duiker species improving habitat condition and installing permeable in their presence in savannah habitats rather than fences on land outside protected areas as part of holistic forests, and their more slender body shape management strategies to reduce potential livestock/ (Bowland 1997). -
20 April 09 FEIR Bravo 3 MM Printing
May 2009 84 10637 Sensitivities The ratings mentioned above in the site description are derived from the level of conservation of that specific vegetation type. This is useful for an overview perspective, but for detailed sensitivities the focus moves to red/orange data species. Due to the endangered status of the plants, their specific occurrence is kept confidential by the GDACE. For guidance, the department has issued the Conservation Plan (CPlan) data which provides an indication as to the locality of red/orange data fauna or flora. Figure 52 illustrates the areas identified by CPlan as being sensitive. These areas have been investigated in detail for sensitive flora. It was found that the areas highlighted in Figure 52 are mostly wetlands, the Bronkhorstspruit Dam and ridges. All of these areas could provide habitat to sensitive species. 7.1.9 Fauna Data Collection A literature review of the faunal species that could occur in the area was conducted. C-Plan data provided from the Mpumalanga provincial department was used to conduct a desktop study of the area. This data consists of terrestrial and aquatic components, ratings provide an indication as to the importance of the area with respect to biodiversity. Additionally, all fauna were noted during the site visit conducted on the 10th-14th March and 18th – 20th November 2008. Regional Description As a consequence of mining and farming in the area, it appears that only small animals are to be found at the site. Small mammals known to occur in the area include hedgehog, rabbits, polecat, meerkat and the ubiquitous rats and mice. -
Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola
Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.