DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards for Caniform Sanctuaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards for Caniform Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Caniform Sanctuaries Version: February, 2018 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Caniform Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................................................... 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS ............................................................................................................ 1 STANDARDS UPDATES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 CANIFORM STANDARDS ........................................................................................................................................ 4 CANIFORM HOUSING ............................................................................................................................ 5 H-1. Types of Space and Size ..................................................................................................................................... 5 H-2. Containment ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 H-3. Ground and Plantings ......................................................................................................................................... 9 H-4. Transfer Doors.................................................................................................................................................. 10 H-5. Shelter .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 H-6. Enclosure Furniture .......................................................................................................................................... 12 H-7. Sanitation ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting ................................................................................................. 15 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................... 16 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities ............................................................................................................................... 16 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing ........................................................................................................................... 17 PF-3. Life Support .................................................................................................................................................... 17 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling ........................................................................................................................ 17 PF-5. Security: Caniform Enclosures ........................................................................................................................ 18 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance ............................................................................... 18 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 20 PF-8. Insect and Rodent Control .............................................................................................................................. 20 PF-9. Record Keeping ............................................................................................................................................... 20 PF-10. Animal Transport .......................................................................................................................................... 21 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................... 22 N-1. Water ............................................................................................................................................................... 22 N-2. Diet ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques .................................................................................................... 24 N-4. Food Storage .................................................................................................................................................... 25 N-5. Food Handling .................................................................................................................................................. 26 VETERINARY CARE.............................................................................................................................. 26 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing ............................................................................................................ 26 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities ......................................................................................................... 27 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program ...................................................................................................................... 27 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities ...................................................................... 28 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Caniforms ............................................................................................................ 29 V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances ................................................................................................... 31 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Caniform Sanctuaries V-7. Breeding/Contraception ................................................................................................................................... 31 V-8. Zoonotic Disease Program................................................................................................................................ 32 WELL-BEING AND HANDLING OF CANIFORMS .......................................................................... 33 W-1. Physical Well-Being ......................................................................................................................................... 33 W-2. Social Housing ................................................................................................................................................. 33 W-3. Introduction of Unfamiliar Individuals ............................................................................................................ 35 W-4. Behavioral/Psychological Well-Being .............................................................................................................. 36 W-5. Caniform-Caregiver Relationships .................................................................................................................. 37 W-6. Handling and Restraint.................................................................................................................................... 38 STAFFING................................................................................................................................................ 39 GENERAL STAFFING ............................................................................................................................................. 39 S-1. General Staffing Considerations ....................................................................................................................... 39 S-2. Security and Emergency Coverage ................................................................................................................... 39 S-3. Volunteer and Internship Programs ................................................................................................................. 39 S-4. Manuals ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 S-5. Employee Training and Continuing Education .................................................................................................. 40 SAFETY POLICIES, PROTOCOLS AND TRAINING .................................................................................................... 41 S-6. General Staff Safety .......................................................................................................................................... 41 S-7. Communication System .................................................................................................................................... 41 S-8. Emergency Response Plans and Protocols ....................................................................................................... 42 S-9. Escaped Caniform Protocol............................................................................................................................... 42 S-10. Emergency Training .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomic Status of Badgers (Mammalia, Mustelidae) from Southwest Asia Based on Cranial Morphometrics, with the Redescription of Meles Canescens
    Zootaxa 3681 (1): 044–058 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.1.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:035D976E-D497-4708-B001-9F8DC03816EE The taxonomic status of badgers (Mammalia, Mustelidae) from Southwest Asia based on cranial morphometrics, with the redescription of Meles canescens ALEXEI V. ABRAMOV1 & ANDREY YU. PUZACHENKO2 1Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyi per. 22, 109017 Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Eurasian badgers (Meles spp.) are widespread in the Palaearctic Region, occurring from the British Islands in the west to the Japanese Islands in the east, including the Scandinavia, Southwest Asia and southern China. The morphometric vari- ation in 30 cranial characters of 692 skulls of Meles from across the Palaearctic was here analyzed. This craniometric anal- ysis revealed a significant difference between the European and Asian badger phylogenetic lineages, which can be further split in two pairs of taxa: meles – canescens and leucurus – anakuma. Overall, European badger populations are very sim- ilar morphologically, particularly with regards to the skull shape, but differ notably from those from Asia Minor, the Mid- dle East and Transcaucasia. Based on the current survey of badger specimens available in main world museums, we have recognized four distinctive, parapatric species: Meles meles, found in most of Europe; Meles leucurus from continental Asia; M.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeographic and Diversification Patterns of the White-Nosed Coati
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 131 (2019) 149–163 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeographic and diversification patterns of the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica): Evidence for south-to-north colonization of North America T ⁎ Sergio F. Nigenda-Moralesa, , Matthew E. Gompperb, David Valenzuela-Galvánc, Anna R. Layd, Karen M. Kapheime, Christine Hassf, Susan D. Booth-Binczikg, Gerald A. Binczikh, Ben T. Hirschi, Maureen McColginj, John L. Koprowskik, Katherine McFaddenl,1, Robert K. Waynea, ⁎ Klaus-Peter Koepflim,n, a Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA b School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA c Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62209, Mexico d Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA e Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA f Wild Mountain Echoes, Vail, AZ 85641, USA g New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY 12233, USA h Amsterdam, New York 12010, USA i Zoology and Ecology, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia j Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA k School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA l College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA m Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species: the Marine Otter by Gale, Cengage Learning, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 04.20.18 Word Count 436 Level 400L
    Endangered Species: The marine otter By Gale, Cengage Learning, adapted by Newsela staff on 04.20.18 Word Count 436 Level 400L Image 1. Marine otters are sometimes called "sea cats." Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Have you ever seen a sea otter? You might have spotted one in the ocean or at a zoo. Sea otters are one kind of otter. The marine otter is another kind. The marine otter lives in South America. It lives along the west coast. That is where the land touches the Pacific Ocean. This otter is sometimes called a sea cat. It is about the size of a cat. It has a long body. Its head is flat. The marine otter has tiny ears and long whiskers. It has short legs and webbed feet. This makes the otter a great swimmer. The otters feed on sea animals. They like crabs and oysters. They swim on their backs to eat. The otters put their catch on their chests. Then they grab a rock. They use it to crack open the hard shells. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. Habitat And Population It is hard to count marine otters. They like to live alone. So they are not usually seen in big groups. Scientists think there are not many left. They do not know the exact number. But they think there might be only 2,000 marine otters in the wild today. Sea otters live in water all the time. Marine otters are different. They live on land. They always live in rocky places close to water, though.
    [Show full text]
  • Placental Haemophagous Organs in the Procyonidae and Mustelidae
    PLACENTAL HAEMOPHAGOUS ORGANS IN THE PROCYONIDAE AND MUSTELIDAE R. F. S. CREED and J. D. BIGGERS Royal Veterinary College, London, N.W. 1, and the King Ranch Laboratory oj Reproductive Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, U.S.A. {Received 9th January 1964) Summary. A description is given of some of the gross anatomical characteristics of the placenta of representatives of five carnivore species of the families Procyonidae and Mustelidae. Emphasis is laid on the occurrence of well-defined haemophagocytic structures in these placen- tae, which have not, hitherto, been investigated. INTRODUCTION Recently, the name haemophagous organ was proposed for a particular structure found in the raccoon {Procyon lotor lotor L.) placenta (Biggers & Creed, 1962). This highly vascular sac-like structure, which hangs into the allantoic cavity, is of macroscopic dimensions and emerges from a central antimesometrial region of the placental annulus in this procyonid carnivore (Pi. 1, Fig. 1). It increases in size and complexity until about two-thirds to three-quarters of the gestation period has elapsed, after which it regresses. Morphologically it is quite distinct from the rest of the placenta which is labyrinthine, and histo¬ logical examination shows it to be made up of a series of branching and anasto¬ mosing lamellae which consist of a thin core of foetal mesenchyme, containing foetal capillaries, lined on either side by tall foetal columnar epithelial cells. Interlamellar spaces are filled with maternal blood which gains access from the maternal side at the base of the haemophagous organ, and bathes the foetal columnar epithelium. The cells of this epithelium bear every indication of being phagocytic and appear to be concerned essentially with the ingestion of maternal blood corpuscles (Biggers & Creed, 1962; Creed & Biggers, 1963a, b).
    [Show full text]
  • African Clawless Otter (Aonyx Capensis) – Near Threatened (IUCN Red List)
    African clawless otter (Aonyx capensis) – Near Threatened (IUCN Red List) The Cape clawless otter is large: head and body about 1 m long, tail 50 cm, and typically weighs 10 - 20 kg. Upper parts of the body are dark brown, and the chin, cheeks, throat, and chest off- white. Whiskers are very long, numerous, and white. They assist in detecting its main prey (crabs) which are captured with the dexterous clawless forefeet. In freshwater habitats, it feeds mostly on crabs, and lesser amounts of frogs, fish, and seasonally on dragonfly larvae. Otters dry and groom themselves by rolling in grass, or on sandbanks or rocks. At most rolling places latrines are established, which like the rolling places, are regularly used. While defecating a clawless otter often rotates on the spot, so the scats are dropped all around it, broken into short pieces, not tapered at both ends. When fresh scats are dark brown, changing to a cream colour as they dry out; typically, about 25 mm diameter, range 22 - 30 mm. Track is 60 – 90mm wide. Male’s larger than female’s African Otter Network – africanotternetwork.wordpress.com – African clawless Fresh scat – 20 - 32mm diameter, typically full of crab, maybe some fish. No seeds, hair. Otter scat – fresh (left); aged (below) Otter scat can be confused with marsh mongoose scat (right). Mongoose scat is smaller 15 – 22mm diameter and consists of crab, small mammal (hair), insect, bird feathers Marsh mongoose scat The African Otter Network is looking for information on current distribution: if seen please report to: [email protected] Where, when, how many, and any other observation information.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV International Otter Congress Presentations 8-13 April 2019
    XIV International Otter Congress Presentations 8-13 April 2019 Presentation Abstracts 1.1 Preliminary results of the first otter survey in Sichuan Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve, China Author(s): Limin Chen1 Ziyu Ma2 Fei Li2 Affiliation(s): 1 Sichuan Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve, China 2 Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden, Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, Hong Kong SAR, China Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra) were once widely distributed in China. But extensive hunting up to the late-20th century decimated their population. Since its establishment in 1978, Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve in northern Sichuan province, Central China put much emphasis on protection and restoration of its natural resources. Otter has not been confirmed in the Reserve for many years, but with a determined anti-poaching effort, the otter population appears to have bounced back, and Tangjiaheis one of the best places in China where Eurasian otters are reliably seen. In April 2018, the reserve set up an otter monitoring team to study the distribution and status of the local otter population. The team interviewed the local communities to collect local ecological knowledge about otters, and conducted 31 transect survey along streams and rivers covering a total of 96 km. The preliminary results of our one-year study found that otters are distributed in the reserve’s two major rivers: Beilu River and Tangjia River. Otter spraints were mostly found at elevation range between 1000m to 2000m. Simple spraint analysis demonstrated that fishes, especially the snow trout Schizothorax
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species Native to the USA and Canada for Which the MIL Has an Image (296) 31 July 2021
    Mammal species native to the USA and Canada for which the MIL has an image (296) 31 July 2021 ARTIODACTYLA (includes CETACEA) (38) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei - Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 7. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Bos bison - American Bison 2. Oreamnos americanus - Mountain Goat 3. Ovibos moschatus - Muskox 4. Ovis canadensis - Bighorn Sheep 5. Ovis dalli - Thinhorn Sheep CERVIDAE - deer 1. Alces alces - Moose 2. Cervus canadensis - Wapiti (Elk) 3. Odocoileus hemionus - Mule Deer 4. Odocoileus virginianus - White-tailed Deer 5. Rangifer tarandus -Caribou DELPHINIDAE - ocean dolphins 1. Delphinus delphis - Common Dolphin 2. Globicephala macrorhynchus - Short-finned Pilot Whale 3. Grampus griseus - Risso's Dolphin 4. Lagenorhynchus albirostris - White-beaked Dolphin 5. Lissodelphis borealis - Northern Right-whale Dolphin 6. Orcinus orca - Killer Whale 7. Peponocephala electra - Melon-headed Whale 8. Pseudorca crassidens - False Killer Whale 9. Sagmatias obliquidens - Pacific White-sided Dolphin 10. Stenella coeruleoalba - Striped Dolphin 11. Stenella frontalis – Atlantic Spotted Dolphin 12. Steno bredanensis - Rough-toothed Dolphin 13. Tursiops truncatus - Common Bottlenose Dolphin MONODONTIDAE - narwhals, belugas 1. Delphinapterus leucas - Beluga 2. Monodon monoceros - Narwhal PHOCOENIDAE - porpoises 1. Phocoena phocoena - Harbor Porpoise 2. Phocoenoides dalli - Dall’s Porpoise PHYSETERIDAE - sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus – Sperm Whale TAYASSUIDAE - peccaries Dicotyles tajacu - Collared Peccary CARNIVORA (48) CANIDAE - dogs 1. Canis latrans - Coyote 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemism and Diversity of Small Mammals Along Two Neighboring Bornean Mountains
    Endemism and diversity of small mammals along two neighboring Bornean mountains Miguel Camacho-Sanchez1,2,*, Melissa T.R. Hawkins3,4,5,*, Fred Tuh Yit Yu6, Jesus E. Maldonado3 and Jennifer A. Leonard1 1 Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics Group, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain 2 CiBIO—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal 3 Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA 5 Division of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA 6 Sabah Parks, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Mountains offer replicated units with large biotic and abiotic gradients in a reduced spatial scale. This transforms them into well-suited scenarios to evaluate biogeographic theories. Mountain biogeography is a hot topic of research and many theories have been proposed to describe the changes in biodiversity with elevation. Geometric constraints, which predict the highest diversity to occur in mid-elevations, have been a focal part of this discussion. Despite this, there is no general theory to explain these patterns, probably because of the interaction among different predictors with the local effects of historical factors. We characterize the diversity of small non-volant mammals across the elevational gradient on Mount (Mt.) Kinabalu (4,095 m) and Mt. Tambuyukon (2,579 m), two neighboring mountains in Borneo, Malaysia. We documented a decrease in species richness with elevation which deviates from expectations of the geometric constraints and suggests that spatial Submitted 14 February 2018 Accepted 9 September 2019 factors (e.g., larger diversity in larger areas) are important.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    THE GENERA AND SUBGENERA OF RACCOONS AND THEIR ALLIES. By N. HOLLISTER, Assistant Curator, Division of Mammals, United States National Museum. The family Procyonidae offers a remarkable instance of a group of mammal genera in which the differentiation in the structure of the teeth throughout the series is nearly uniform in degree from genus to genus, and strictly definite in direction from one extreme to the other. Tliis condition is particularly interesting because of the wide difference between the teeth of genera from the extremes of the line, and because the widely diverse cranial and external charac- ters show no special tendency toward serial grouping. EUminating the very aberrant Bassariscus, which clearly does not belong in this series of genera, the superspecific groups remaining within the Procyonidge, when based chiefly on dental characteristics, fall into as weU-ordered a sequence of steps, connecting the Old-World Ailurus with the American Potos, as it would seem possible to find among living animals. (Plate 39.) The one seemingly aberrant cranial feature in Ailurus,^ the presence of the aUsphenoid canal, can not in tliis case be considered a character of family or subfamily importance. The alisphenoid canal in other famiUes of carnivores is known to be absent or present in different genera, in individuals of the same species, or even on the right and left side of the same individual. Of the American groups, Euprocyon is the nearest approach to Ailurus, but if the genera within the family are to be kept of fairly uniform value and degree of differen- tiation, Euprocyon is surely not more than a subgenus of Procyon.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Hose's Civet Diplogale Hosei from Indonesia
    First record of Hose’s Civet Diplogale hosei from Indonesia, and records of other carnivores in the Schwaner Mountains, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Hiromitsu SAMEJIMA1 and Gono SEMIADI2 Abstract One of the least-recorded carnivores in Borneo, Hose’s Civet Diplogale hosei , was filmed twice in a logging concession, the Katingan–Seruyan Block of Sari Bumi Kusuma Corporation, in the Schwaner Mountains, upper Seruyan River catchment, Central Kalimantan. This, the first record of this species in Indonesia, is about 500 km southwest of its previously known distribution (northern Borneo: Sarawak, Sabah and Brunei). Filmed at 325The m a.s.l., IUCN these Red List records of Threatened are below Species the previously known altitudinal range (450–1,800Prionailurus m). This preliminary planiceps survey forPardofelis medium badia and large and Otter mammals, Civet Cynogalerunning 100bennettii camera-traps in 10 plots for one (Bandedyear, identified Civet Hemigalus in this concession derbyanus 17 carnivores, Arctictis including, binturong on Neofelis diardi, three Endangered Pardofe species- lis(Flat-headed marmorata Cat and Sun Bear Helarctos malayanus, Bay Cat . ) and six Vulnerable species , Binturong , Sunda Clouded Leopard , Marbled Cat Keywords Cynogale bennettii, as well, Pardofelis as Hose’s badia Civet), Prionailurus planiceps Catatan: PertamaBorneo, camera-trapping, mengenai Musang Gunung Diplogale hosei di Indonesia, serta, sustainable karnivora forest management lainnya di daerah Pegunungan Schwaner, Kalimantan Tengah Abstrak Diplogale hosei Salah satu jenis karnivora yang jarang dijumpai di Borneo, Musang Gunung, , telah terekam dua kali di daerah- konsesi hutan Blok Katingan–Seruyan- PT. Sari Bumi Kusuma, Pegunungan Schwaner, di sekitar hulu Sungai Seruya, Kalimantan Tengah. Ini merupakan catatan pertama spesies tersebut terdapat di Indonesia, sekitar 500 km dari batas sebaran yang diketa hui saat ini (Sarawak, Sabah, Brunei).
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Issue
    ISSN 1023-9030 IUCN Otter Spec. Group Bull. 21 (2)/2004 IUCN OTTER SPECIALIST GROUP BULLETIN Volume 21 (2) October 2004 IUCN Otter Spec. Group Bull. 21(2) 2004 CONTENT Note from the Editor................................................................................................. 60 IUCN/SCC OSG GROUP In Memoriam Claus Reuther .................................................................................... 61 ARTICLES Assessing the Distribution of Reintroduced Populations of River Otters in 63 Pennsylvania (USA) – Development of a Landscape Level Approach .……………... First Physical Evidence of the Nearctic River Otter (Lontra canadensis) collected in 70 New Mexico, USA, since 1953 …………………………… ……………………….. High Mortality of Nearctic River Otters on a Florida, USA, Interstate Highway 76 during an Extreme Drought REPORTS Intraspecific Agonism between Giant Otters ……………………………………… 89 Preliminary Study of the Tracks of Captive Otters (Lutra lutra) as a Tool for Field Research ……………………………………………………………........................ 93 Literature..………………..............................................................................…....... 100 Congress Announcements.................................................................................….... 101 - 2 - IUCN Otter Spec. Group Bull. 21(2) 2004 IUCN OTTER SPECIALIST GROUP BULLETIN The IUCN Otter Specialist Group Bulletin appears biannually. Articles, reports, symposium announcements and information on recent publications are welcome. All submissions should be typed double-spaced. The submission
    [Show full text]