DOCSLIB.ORG

Kilbeggan, Co. Westmeath Unique ID: 250426 Stage 1: Desktop Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kilbeggan, Co. Westmeath Unique ID: 250426 Stage 1: Desktop Review Location: Kilbeggan, Co. Westmeath Unique ID: 250426 (from PFRA database) Initial OPW Designation APSR AFRR IRR Co-ordinates Easting: 233250 Northing: 235500 River / Catchment / Sub-catchment Type of Flooding / Flood Risk Fluvial non-tidal Fluvial tidal Coastal (identify all that apply) Stage 1: Desktop Review 1.1 Flood History River Flow Path (include review of The River Brosna flows through Kilbeggan and meanders south westerly to Floodmaps.ie) the river’s confluence with the River Shannon at Shannon Harbour. Flood Event Records Two flood records are listed in floodmaps.ie. Specific information about the events is not available; however the Area Engineers report identifies 23 areas prone to flooding in and around Kilbeggan. PFRA database comments (in italics): 1.2 Relevant information on OPW comments flooding issues from Designated APSR on the basis of predictive analysis and historical extents. OPW and LA staff Agree with APSR but make point that lots of extractions Predictive and some history - No wedges LA comments New housing estate, but outside the extent. New mixed use development at PO.Coola bridge properties – most derelict WWTW right beside river and within extent.Just off R436 – Coola Bridge could cause a hydraulic block also. Not so much of risk. River is low. If water is abstracted – River Brosna water extraction at Kirpatrick. Lough Ennell pump water out, pipe to canal. WI project / Westmeath County Council 2011 Meeting / discussion summary comments: OPW comments • The Brosna Drainage scheme runs through Kilbeggan. There are embankments upstream of Kilbeggan that provide flood protection. There is a mill race upstream of the town at Coola Bridge which floods into the river in heavy rainfall events. • There is an industrial estate which may be below the level of the embankments in the village centre on the right bank. Dun Bia development downstream of the village may be at risk of flooding. • The mill race in the centre of the village is a tourist attraction. LA comments • Westmeath County Council felt there was a significant flood risk at Kilbeggan, particularly at Coola Bridge. • A WWTP may also be at risk. Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 25 26 Kilbeggan V0_A 1 1.4 PFRA Data 1.4.1 PFRA hazard PFRA mapping available in GIS layer: Yes No mapping PFRA mapping included on FRR map: Yes No 1.4.2 Summary of Type FRI score Principal Receptors (if available) UWWTP 2.5 Arch_Regional 53.2 Arch_National 0.25 Total 808.25 1.7 Stage 1 Aspect Clearly APSR Uncertain Evaluation Flood History (1.1) X OPW / LA Information (1.2) X PFRA Evaluation (1.4) X Overall Desktop Evaluation (if any above aspect is uncertain X then overall designation is uncertain) 1.8 Proposed level of Level A Site Visit assessment for Stage 2 site visits Level B Site Visit X 2 Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 25 26 Kilbeggan V0_A Stage 2: Site Inspection Level B Assessment Date and Time of Inspection Date:14/04/11 Time: 14:00 Names of inspection team Peter Smyth (including OPW/LA staff if present) James Murray 2.3 Local The OPW maintained embankments were discussed with one local. He knowledge - on-site indicated that the embankments had not been breached in the last seven comments years, beyond which he had no knowledge of them. He also indicated that the drainage ditches have never risen significantly and do not pose a flood risk. (OPW, LA and any info volunteered by local residents during visit) 2.4 Comments on The single span road bridge in the centre of Kilbeggan is a major constriction hydraulic to flow, this is exacerbated at the mill race upstream. However, the road level constrictions is high through the town any would act as a natural barrier to flood flows, thus (bridges, etc.) and protecting properties downstream of the bridge. conveyance routes The weir arrangement (at the head of the mill race) significantly controls levels upstream on the Brosna. Parallel drainage ditches are running at approximately 1.5 m lower than the main Brosna. OPW maintain earth embankments to avoid flooding of agricultural land upstream of weir. 2.6 Defence Assets Formal and Open Channel Watercourses Informal Flood Man-made river channel Flood relief channel Canal Defence Assets Mill leat Drainage channels / back drains (include effective and ineffective Bridges and Culvert crossings assets to inform Single Arch bridge Multi-Arch bridge asset survey and Single Span bridge Multi-Span bridge potential Box culvert(s) Pipe culvert(s) Arch Culvert(s) mitigation measures) Culverted Watercourses (culvert length is greater than just a crossing) Box culvert(s) Pipe culvert(s) Arch Culvert(s) Irregular Culvert(s) Walls and Embankments Embankment(s) Raised wall(s) Retaining wall(s) Control Structures – weirs, gates, dams Fixed crest weir Adjustable weir Dam / Barrage Sluice gates Lock gates Radial gates Storage On-line storage (natural) On-line storage (artificial) Off-line storage Outfalls Flapped outfall(s) into watercourse Unflapped outfall(s) into watercourse i.e. from smaller watercourses, drains etc. into river / estuary / sea Tidal flap(s) Tidal sluice(s) i.e. from main watercourse into estuary / sea Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 25 26 Kilbeggan V0_A 3 Other Pumping Station Erosion Protection Sand Dunes Additional notes (if required): 2.8 Initial Potential Mitigation Measures Non-structural Planning and Development control measures Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems Flood forecasting / warning Change in Operating Procedures for water level control: Public awareness campaign Individual property protection Land use management Structural Strategic development management for floodplain development: measures (integration of measures into strategic development proposals) Storage: On-line Off-line Flow diversion: Flood relief channel Flood relief culvert Increase conveyance: Bridge works Channel works Floodplain Flood defences: Walls Embankments Localised works: Defence raising In-fill gaps Trash screen Maintenance works: Culvert / channel clearance Asset maintenance Relocation of properties: Improve existing defences: (describe) Other (describe): Outcomes Recommended APSR not an APSR IRR Designation Summary Comments Kilbeggan has a long history of flooding. The PFRA mapping predicts an (if required) ongoing significant flood risk with this conclusion supported by both Local Authorities and the OPW. Kilbeggan was confirmed as an APSR following a desk based assessment, with no on-site verification required. Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 25 26 Kilbeggan V0_A 4 Photo1: Coola Bridge at Kilbeggan, Photo 2: Weir downstream of Coola upstream face. Bridge. Photo 3: Mill downstream of weir. Photo 4: Bridge downstream of weir, downstream face. 5 Flood Risk Review Report – UoM 25 26 Kilbeggan V0_A 230500 231000 231500 232000 232500 233000 233500 234000 234500 235000 235500 236000 236500 Kilbeggan 238000 ± 237500 237000 Legend APSR Boundary Rail Network 236500 for CARs only Roads Historic Flooding (National Roads Authority) @@! Incidents Airport Land Water bodies mapped OPW Embankments from RADARSAT-2 * Historic Flood Data Hydrometric Gauging 236000 H G ! Stations Architectural Heritage EPA River Network ^_ UNESCO Sites !R Rail Stations Special Protection Area Special Area for N ! Nursing Homes Conservation 235500 Residential Care N Proposed National ! for the Elderly Heritage Area !E Schools National Heritage Area ] Benefiting Lands ! Ports and Harbours Flood Extents (PFRA, 2010) 235000 !O OPW Buildings 10% AEP Flood Extent !!H Health Centres (1 in 10 chance in any given year) !G Garda Stations 1% AEP Flood Extent !H Hospitals (1 in 100 chance in any 234500 given year) !F Fire Stations 0.1% AEP Flood Extent # Civil Defence (1 in 1000 chance in any ! Head Quarters given year) o ! Airports * Data Source - Service Régional de Traitement d’Image et de Télédétection (SERTIT) (acquired on the 5th of December 2009). 234000 Client 233500 Project Shannon CFRAM Study The PFRA Flood Extents shown are indicative. They have been developed using Flood Risk Review Map Title simple and cost-effective methods that are suitable for the PFRA. They should not be Kilbeggan used for local decision-making or any other purpose without verification. Drawing Status FINAL Job No. 32102500 Figure No. Revision CAR 30 Scale 1:20,000 @ A3 Jun 28, 2011 233000 Checked Review Approved Drawn AD/SF JC KK/JM IB/PS Copyright reserved 0 0.5 1 2 Includes Ordnance Survey Ireland data reproduced under OSi Licence number EN0021011. Jacobs UK Ltd Km Unauthorised reproduction infringes Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland copyright, © Ordnance Survey Ireland, 2011. 95 Bothwell Street, Glasgow, G2 7HX.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Report on Areas of Scientific Interest in County Offaly
    An Foras CONSERVATION AND AMENITY Forbartha ADVISORY SERVICE Teoranta The National Institute for Physical Planning and Construction Research PRELIMINARY REPORT ON AREAS OF SCIENTIFIC INTEREST IN n C)TTNTY C)FFAT V L ig i6 n Lynne Farrell December, 1972 i n Teach hairttn Bothar Waterloo Ath Cllath 4 Telefan 6 4211 St. Martin's House Waterloo Road Dublin 4 J J 7 7 Li An Foras CONSERVATION AND AMENITY Forbartha ADVISORY SERVICE Teoranta The National Institute for Physical Planning and 7 Construction J Research PRELIMINARY REPORT ON AREAS OF SCIENTIFIC INTEREST IN COTTNTY (FFAT.Y 11 Lynne Farrell December, 1972 7 Li i s Teachhairtin J Bother Waterloo Ath Math 4 Teiefcn 64211 St. Martin's House Waterloo Road Dublin 4 w 7 LJ CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. Preface 1 B Vulnerability of Habitats 3. C General Introduction 6. D Explanation of Criteria Used in 9. Rating Areas and Deciding on Their Priority E Table Summarising the Sites 11. Visited J Detailed Reports on the Sites 16. Table Summarising the Priority of 119. the Sites and Recommendations for Their Protection J 7 U FOREWORD L1 7 jJ This report is based on data abstracted from the filesof the Conservation and Amenity Advisory Section, Planning Division, An Foras Forbartha; from J published and unpublished sources; and from several periods of fieldwork undertaken during August 1971 and September - November 1972.It is a J preliminary survey upon which, it is hoped, further research willbe based. The help of Miss Scannell of the National Herbarium, FatherMoore of U.C.D. Botany Department, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Policies for Ireland's Inland Waterways
    T HE H ERITAGE C OUNCIL Proposing Policies and Priorities for the National Heritage I NTEGRATING P OLICIES FOR I RELAND’ S I NLAND W ATERWAYS August 2005 © An Chomhairle Oidhreachta /The Heritage Council 2005 All rights reserved. Published by the Heritage Council Designed and Produced by B. Magee Design Photographs courtesy of Ruth Delany Heritage Boat Association Heritage Council Irish Image Collection ISSN 1393 – 6808 The Heritage Council of Ireland Series ISBN 1 901137 77 5 75 CONTENTS FOREWORD . 6 ABBREVIATIONS . 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 8 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS . 9 1 INTRODUCTION . 12 2 INLAND WATERWAYS HERITAGE – DEFINITION AND IMPORTANCE . 14 3 OVERALL AIM . 14 4 BACKGROUND . 15 5 MANAGEMENT OF THE WATERWAYS RESOURCE . 16 6 FUNDING . .18 7 THE CORRIDOR STUDY CONCEPT- DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND OPPORTUNITIES . 19 8 HERITAGE – CONSERVATION, ENHANCEMENT AND ENJOYMENT . 21 9 USER MANAGEMENT . 27 10 PROMOTION AND MARKETING . 29 11 EXPANSION OF THE WATERWAYS SYSTEM . 30 12 COMPLETION OF WORKS IN PROGRESS . 31 13 FURTHER WORKS . 34 14 LONG-TERM WORKS WITH NATURAL HERITAGE IMPLICATIONS . 39 15 DERELICT WATERWAYS AS IMPORTANT HERITAGE SITES . 41 BAINISTIOCHT AR OIDHREACHT UISCEBHEALAÍ INTÍRE ÉIREANN . 45 The inland waterways and their corridors should be managed in an integrated broad-based way, conserving their built and archaeological heritage features, and protecting their landscape and biodiversity. Recognising that the inland waterways are a unique part of our heritage, but which today “are fulfilling a new role not envisaged for them originally, we aim to enhance the enjoyment and appreciation of them as living heritage both for this generation and for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Shannon (Brosna) Catchment Assessment 2010-2015 (HA 25A)
    Lower Shannon (Brosna) Catchment Assessment 2010-2015 (HA 25A) Catchment Science & Management Unit Environmental Protection Agency September 2018 Version no. 3 Preface This document provides a summary of the characterisation outcomes for the water resources of the Lower Shannon (Brosna) Catchment, which have been compiled and assessed by the EPA, with the assistance of local authorities and RPS consultants. The information presented includes status and risk categories of all water bodies, details on protected areas, significant issues, significant pressures, load reduction assessments, recommendations on future investigative assessments, areas for actions and environmental objectives. The characterisation assessments are based on information available to the end of 2015. Additional, more detailed characterisation information is available to public bodies on the EPA WFD Application via the EDEN portal, and more widely on the catchments.ie website. The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the situation in the catchment and help inform further action and analysis of appropriate measures and management strategies. This document is supported by, and can be read in conjunction with, a series of other documents which provide explanations of the elements it contains: 1. An explanatory document setting out the full characterisation process, including water body, subcatchment and catchment characterisation. 2. A published paper on Source Load Apportionment Modelling, which can be accessed at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.22 3. A published paper on the role of pathways in transferring nutrients to streams and the relevance to water quality management strategies, which can be accessed at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.3318/bioe.2016.19.pdf 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of White-Clawed Crayfish Austropotamobius Pallipes in Irish Lakes in 2007
    Monitoring of white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes in 2007 Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 37 2 Monitoring of white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes in 2007 William O’Connor 1, Gerard Hayes1, Ciaran O'Keeffe 2 & Deirdre Lynn 2 1Ecofact Environmental Consultants Ltd., Tait Business Centre, Dominic Street, Limerick City. t. +353 61 419477 f. +353 61 414315 e. [email protected] w. www.ecofact.ie 2National Parks and Wildlife Service, 7 Ely Place, Dublin 2 Citation: O’Connor, W., Hayes G., O’Keeffe, C. & Lynn, D. (2009) Monitoring of white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes in 2007. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No 37. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin. Cover photo: Surveying for crayfish in Lough Glenade, Co. Sligo ( W. O’Connor). Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 – 6670 SUMMARY • This report outlines the findings of a study of the Annex II listed white-clawed crayfish in 26 selected Irish lakes. The white-clawed crayfish is Ireland’s only crayfish species and Ireland is thought to hold some of the best European stocks of this species, under least threat from external factors. Lake populations of white-clawed crayfish are rare in Britain and across Europe so this adds to Ireland’s unique position in harbouring populations in lime-rich lakes. The current study sought to add to the body of existing knowledge on crayfish stocks in Irish lakes and provide a baseline reference for future studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequency Analysis”
    OFFICE OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD STUDIES UPDATE PROGRAMME WORK-PACKAGE WP-2.2 “FREQUENCY ANALYSIS” Appendix 4 Department of Engineering Hydrology & The Environmental Change Institute National University of Ireland, Galway September 2009 Appendix 4A1 6011 RIVER FANE @ MOYLES MILL Annual Maximum Floods 1957 to 2004.(no missing years) A1 A (km 2)= 234.00 N= 48 Year AMF(m 3 /s) Moments PWM L-Moments 1957 12.34 Mean 15.856 M100 15.856 L1 15.856 L-Cv 0.113 1958 21.07 Median 15.390 M110 8.825 L2 1.795 L-Skew 0.089 1959 15.39 Std.Dev. 3.195 M120 6.210 L3 0.161 L-Kur 0.074 1960 14.20 CV 0.202 M130 4.819 L4 0.134 1961 15.70 HazenS. 0.812 1962 13.39 30 1963 18.84 6011 RIVER FANE @ MOYLES MILL 1964 19.49 EV1 25 1965 18.14 1966 18.84 20 1967 13.39 winter peak 1968 15.39 15 1969 13.56 1970 10.94 AMF(m3/s) 10 1971 13.39 1972 10.90 1973 13.31 5 2 5 10 25 50 100 500 1974 14.37 1975 11.29 0 EV1 y 1976 19.13 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1977 11.68 30 1978 26.36 LO2 1979 16.91 25 1980 17.14 1981 17.04 20 1982 17.04 1983 19.35 15 1984 11.98 AMF(m3/s) 1985 12.49 10 1986 14.20 FANE CATCHMENT 1987 15.16 5 1988 15.45 2 5 10 25 50 100 500 1989 12.74 0 1990 14.88 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 1991 19.03 Logistic reduced variate 1992 12.87 1.5 1993 14.88 LogNormal 1994 16.89 1.4 1995 19.99 1996 15.16 1.3 1997 15.73 1998 14.88 1.2 1999 17.49 1.1 2000 19.51 log10(AMF) 2001 19.35 1 2002 19.67 2003 11.98 0.9 2004 18.10 2 5 10 25 50 100 500 0.8 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Normal N(0,1) y COMMENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Shannon River Basin District
    For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. shannon river basin district EPA Export 26-07-2013:01:52:30 This is how the booklet is structured: Invitation to comment You are invited to give your views on the implementation of the Your views Background: We would like you to read this booklet and let us have your comments. EU Water Framework Directive in the Shannon International the WFD story so far 2 River Basin District. This booklet says what the Directive requires For each of the most important water-related issues, the booklet sets out: us to do and how we are working together to implement it. It • background information showing the extent of each issue and the way that it can cause water problems summarises the main issues identified to date and outlines Wastewater and • a summary of existing controls and an assessment of their adequacy Industrial Discharges 13 proposals for dealing with them. Similar booklets have been • the proposed actions, the parties responsible for taking those actions and the users who would be affected. produced for the seven other River Basin Districts in Ireland and We are interested in receiving your comments on whether we have identified the most important issues, whether we Northern Ireland. Landfills, Quarries, Mines have overlooked any significant issues and what you think about the proposed actions. and Contaminated Lands 16 The Water Framework Directive (WFD) was adopted in 2000; We will be consulting for six months on the water-related issues and suggested actions contained in this booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Fisheries Investigation S
    IRISH FISHERIES INVESTIGATION S SERIES A (Freshwater) No. 12 (1973) AN ROINN TALMHAIOCHTA AGUS IASCAIGH (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) FO-ROINN IASCAIGH (Fisheries Division) DUBLIN: PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE TO BE PURCHASED FROM THE GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE, G.P.O. ARCADE. DUBLIN. 7tp IRISH FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS SERIES A (FRESHWATER) No. 12 (1973) J. J. BRACKEN TIlE AGE AND GROWTH OF PIKE Esox lucius FROM FOUR IRISH TROUT RIVERS The age and growth of pike Esox lucius from four Irish trout rivers by J. J. BRACKEN Zoological Department, University College, Dublin. ABSTRACT Age and growth of pike Esox lucius L. taken by electrical fishing in four typical Irish trout rivers were determined, using isometric axis of scales. Age data showed that young pike dominated in catches in all four rivers. Very few pike older than four yc'ars were captured. Growth of pike in these rivers was compared with earlier results obtained for lake pike. River pike were much smaller than fish of similar age from the larger limestone' lakes. Tag and recapture data from the Camlin river" confirmed that mean growth results were very similar to back-calculated means per year class. Data showed little movement of pike within this system and that electrical fishing was reasonably efficient for clearance' of coarse fish in shallow trout waters. Stomach contents of pike taken in Robe and Camlin rivers were qualitatively analysed. Since 1952 the Inland Fisheries Trust's development programme has included the removal 01 pike and other coarse fishes from a number of Irish trout lakes and rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality - Existing Status & Management System
    Catchment Monitoring Water Quality - Existing Status & Management System Conclusions Lake water quality is in a satisfactory condition in the upper reaches of the River Shannon. Progressive increases in the levels of planktonic development are noted in lakes downstream of the oligotrophic Lough Allen to Lough Ree, and in Lough Key on the Boyle River, attesting to increasing nutrient inputs to the inflowing rivers. While many of these lakes are still classified as mesotrophic (Table 13) they are at the upper boundary limit of this category and if current trends are maintained these lakes will soon be classified as eutrophic. Lough Forbes already has planktonic algal developments consistent with such a category. Lough Ree has been classified as strongly eutrophic in recent years and the findings of the recent monitoring point to a continuation of the decline in the water quality of this lake. The unsatisfactory water quality of a number of rivers in the catchment, noted in 1993-94, still persists and the nutrient loads carried by these rivers support the excessive algal growths recorded in the lake. No improvement in the water quality of Lough Ree can be expected until the sources of the nutrients are significantly reduced or eliminated. Increased light penetration and reduced planktonic algal populations were recorded in Lough Derg in 1997 indicating a considerable improvement in the water quality of the lake, particularly in the middle and lower sections of the lake, compared to previous years (further improvements in these parameters were noted in July 1998). This welcome improvement in water quality in the lake may be attributed to two developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges of Offaly County: an Industrial Heritage Review
    BRIDGES OF OFFALY COUNTY: AN INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE REVIEW Fred Hamond for Offaly County Council November 2005 Cover Approach to Derrygarran Bridge over Figile River, Coolygagan Td. CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY 1. METHODOLOGY 1 1.1 Project brief 1 1.2 Definition of terms 1 1.3 Bridge identification and selection 1 1.4 Numbering 2 1.5 Paper survey 3 1.6 Field survey 3 1.7 Computer database 4 1.8 Sample representation 4 2. BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY 5 2.1 Bridge types 5 2.2 Span forms 7 2.3 Arch bridges 8 2.4 Beam bridges 11 2.5 Suspension bridges 18 2.6 Pipe bridges 19 3. BRIDGE BUILDERS 20 3.1 Grand Jury bridges 20 3.2 Canal bridges 22 3.3 Government bridges 26 3.4 Railway bridges 28 3.5 Private bridges 31 3.6 Offaly CC bridges 32 3.7 National Roads Authority bridges 33 3.8 Office of Public Works bridges 33 3.9 Bord na Mona bridges 35 3.10 Iarnród Éireann bridges 37 4. BRIDGES OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE 38 4.1 Evaluation criteria 38 4.2 Rating 39 4.3 Statutory protection 40 4.4 Recommendations for statutory protection 41 5. ISSUES 43 5.1 Bridge upgrading 43 5.2 Repairs and maintenance 46 5.3 Attachments to bridges 48 5.4 The reuse of defunct bridges 48 5.5 Bridge ecology 49 6. CONCLUSIONS 51 APPENDICES: 1. Bridge component numbering 52 2. Example of bridge recording form 53 3. Heritage evaluations 54 4. Bridge names 111 PART 2: SITE INVENTORY Indexes by: Name, type, townland, town, OFIAR number, component Townland, town, type, name, OFIAR number, component Town, type, name, OFIAR number, component National grid, type, name, OFIAR number, component Type, townland, town, name, OFIAR number, component Offaly CC bridge number, OFIAR number Site reports, listed by OFIAR number PREFACE This report, commissioned by Offaly County Council, presents the results of a survey of over 400 bridges of every type throughout the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakelands and Lots More
    EXPERIENCE THE LAKELANDSEXPERIENCE Lakelands & Inland Waterways Pocket Guide FREE COPY THINGS TO DO PLACES TO SEE FAMILY FUN EVENTS & MAPS AND LOTS MORE... EXPERIENCE THE LAKELANDSEXPERIENCE 1 2 GET IN TOUCH! S L O B M Y S Visit one of Fáilte Ireland’s official tourist offices, where ment Ireland / Govern Survey © Ordnance 8670 No. Permit Ireland Survey Ordnance 3 you will receive free and unbiased advice, information, maps and literature. You can also book accommodation, attractions, events, festivals, tickets and tours. ZONE 1 - Mullingar Discover Ireland Fermanagh Visitor Information Centre Centre Market Square, Mullingar, Wellington Road, Enniskillen, Co Westmeath 4 Co. Fermanagh, BT74 7EF T 044-9348650 T 028 6632 3110 E [email protected] E [email protected] #lovewestmeath @fermanaghlakes ZONE 4 ZONE 2 Limerick Tourist Office Cavan Tourist Office 20 O’Connell Street, Limerick City Johnston Central Library, T 061-317522 5 Farnham St E [email protected] Cavan Town #lovelimerick T 049-4331942 E [email protected] Nenagh Tourist Office Banba Square, Nenagh, Co. Tipperary. ZONE 3 T 067-31610 Athlone Tourist Office E [email protected] Athlone Castle, Athlone Town, #lovetipperary 6 Co. Westmeath T 090 6494630 For a complete list of all E [email protected] Community Tourist Offices #lovewestmeath and Visitor Information Points affiliated with Fáilte Ireland, please visit our website below. 7 Connect with us: 2 CONTENTS Contents Get in Touch Inside Cover Experience the Lakelands 2 Zone 1: Lough Erne
    [Show full text]
  • Westmeath County Council Kilbeggan Wastewater Treatment Plant
    Westmeath County Council Kilbeggan Wastewater Treatment Plant - Discharge Licence Application For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Appropriate Assessment October 2010 MGW0058CR0032 EPA Export 26-07-2013:23:31:39 For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. EPA Export 26-07-2013:23:31:39 Kilbeggan Wastewater Discharge Licence Application - Appropriate Assessment Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1 2 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 3 3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 5 3.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 5 4 STAGE 1 - SCREENING........................................................................................ 7 4.1 STEP 1 - MANAGEMENT OF THE SITE ................................................................................ 7 4.2 STEP 2 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ......................................... 7 4.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................... 7 4.4 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................ 12 5 STEP 3 - CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NATURA 2000 SITES ....................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Water Levels on the River Shannon
    Understanding water levels on the River Shannon Shannon Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Study Introduction In line with government policy, the Office of Public Works (OPW ) is in the proces s o f un der ta king t he Shannon Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment a nd Ma nagemen t (CF RAM ) S tudy to g ive us a clear and comprehensive picture of flood risk in the Shannon a rea and set out how the risk can be managed effectively and sustainably. Based on technical work and information from stakeh olde rs and lo cal comm unitie s, we will gener ate detailed flood maps (due by the end of 2013) showing wh er e curr en t and f utu re floo ding is likely to occur. By 2015, we will produce Flood Risk Management P lans ( FRM Ps ) wh ich will set out specif ic programmes of measures and how the OPW, local aut horities and oth er sta keholders, inc luding the ESB and Waterways Ireland, should work together to address flood risks in the catchment. In the meantime, a lot of work needs to be done to help us fully understand the risks of flooding and ensure that the flood maps and subsequent plans are properly informed, accurate and reliable. An important part of this early work is to research and understand the current operations of structures (e.g. weirs and sluices) along the River Shannon, who has responsibilities for water levels and how this impacts flood risk management. Map of Ireland showing location of Shannon Map of Shannon CFRAM Study area showing location CFRAM Study area of the Callow s are a between Athlone and Meelick W eir 2 Shannon Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Study What is the River Shannon Level Operation Review report? The River Shannon Level Operation Review report is the output from a desk-based technical assessment that was carried out during 2011 which aimed to: l Analyse existing data and available information on water levels and flows, and operating regulations for the control structures and dams at key locations along the River Shannon.
    [Show full text]