DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Draft Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S030-2018-0004-EA September 2018 Spring Mountain Raceway Resource Management Plan Amendment and Two Modified Competitive Land Sales N-95802 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Pahrump Field Office Phone: (702) 515-5000 Fax: (702) 515-5010 Table of Contents Chapter 1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Proposed Project Information ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Conformance Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Plans or Other Environmental Analyses......................................................... 4 1.5 Scoping, Public Involvement, and Issues ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5.1 Internal scoping........................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5.2 External scoping ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.5.3 Consultation with Cooperating Agencies/Organizations ............................................................................................ 9 1.5.4 Issues........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Description of the No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Description of the Proposed Action Alternative .............................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis .................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects ................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Air Quality - PM10 ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Affected Environment and Geographic Scope .......................................................................................................... 16 3.1.2 Environmental Effects of the No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 17 3.1.3 Environmental Effects of the Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 17 3.2 Endangered Species: Desert Tortoise ............................................................................................................................. 18 3.2.1 Affected Environment and Geographic Scope .......................................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Environmental Effects of the No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 20 3.2.3 Environmental Effects of the Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 20 3.3 Socioeconomic and Demographic Conditions ................................................................................................................. 21 3.3.1 Affected Environment and Geographic Scope .......................................................................................................... 21 3.3.2 Environmental Effects of the No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 21 3.3.3 Environmental Effects of the Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 21 3.4 Travel Management ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.4.1 Affected Environment and Geographic Scope .......................................................................................................... 23 3.4.2 Environmental Effects of the No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 24 3.4.3 Environmental Effects of the Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 24 3.5 Water Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.5.1. Affected Environment and Geographic Scope ......................................................................................................... 24 3.5.2 Environmental Effects of the No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 25 3.5.3 Environmental Effects of the Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 25 Chapter 4 References ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 EA Number: DOI-BLM-NV-S030-2018-0004-EA BLM Case File Number: N-95802 Chapter 1 1.1 Introduction and Background This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared to analyze and disclose the environmental effects of: (1) amending the Las Vegas Resource Management Plan (RMP) to identify two parcels of public land for disposal; and (2) two Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) modified competitive land sales of a total of approximately 620 acres to Spring Mountain Raceway, LLC (herein identified as the Proponent), in the Town of Pahrump, Nye County, Nevada. The proposal was filed with the Pahrump Field Office on July 17, 2017. The proposed lands are shown in Figure 1 and legally described in Section 1.1. The Las Vegas RMP allows for the transfer of land within the disposal areas for various uses. FLPMA requires that land offered for sale must be identified in the land use plan. The Las Vegas RMP does not specifically identify these parcels for disposal therefore an amendment of the RMP is required. The requested public land is located in the Town of Pahrump in Nye County, Nevada. The Town of Pahrump and Nye County were hard hit by the Recession and economic recovery has been slow. Once disposed, the land will be annexed by the Town of Pahrump. The Nye County Board of Commissioners and the Governor’s Office of Economic Development have offered support for this project expansion, which supports community expansion, and economic development and diversification objectives. Neither of these objectives can be achieved prudently or feasibly achieved on land other than the adjacent public land. Disposal of this land would outweigh other public objectives and values served by maintaining such tract in Federal ownership, and which readily can be met on the surrounding public land. The requested land meets the disposal criteria because it will serve important public objectives. The project Proponent, Spring Mountain Raceway, LLC is an adjacent landowner. The adjacent private land continues to be developed for industrial, commercial, and residential use by the project Proponent in support of the facility’s expansion. In 2012, the Proponent, Spring Mountain Raceway acquired the remaining adjacent disposal land from BLM at Fair Market Value in a modified competitive sale; this land is currently under construction by the Proponent in furtherance of a number of mixed use developments. Public land managed by BLM borders the existing facility to the north and east, and developed a patchwork of developed and vacant private lots border to the south and west. None of the private lots are of adequate size to accommodate the proposed track expansion. The requested sale meets the criteria for modified competitive bidding because there are existing equitable interests that must be considered. This EA and RMP Amendment will assist the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan Endangered and Species Nevada
    RECOVERYPLAN FOR THE ENDANGEREDAND THREATENED SPECIES OF&H MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared by Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF ASH MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared By Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~FP2 3 ‘:XN Date This plan covers the following federally listed species in Ash Meadows, Nevada and California: Devil’s Hole pupfish, Warm Springs pupfish, Ash Meadows Arnargosa pupfish, Ash Meadows speckled dace, Ash Meadows naucorid, Ash Meadows blazing star, Ash Meadows ivesia, Ainargosa niterwort, Spring-loving centaury, Ash Meadows sunray, Ash Meadows inilk-vetch, and Ash Meadows guxnplant. THIS IS THE COMPLETED ASH MEADOWS SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES (AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS) WHO PLAYED THE KEY ROLE IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS, AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES, AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 123 pp. Additional copies may be obtained from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301-492-6403 1-800-582-3421 : ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This plan results from the efforts of many who spent considerable time and energy to prevent the destruction of Ash Meadows and the extinction of its diverse endemic biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Pahrump-Tecopa.Pdf
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Pahrump, Nevada and Tecopa, California Public Scoping Meetings April 5-6, 2006 Amargosa Valley Desert National Wildlife Refuge 9 2 Y W Nellis Air Force Base H E T A Indian Springs T S U Moapa River Indian Reservation S HW Y 95 Nellis Air Force Base Desert National Wildlife Refuge 3 7 3 Y 56 Dry Lake STA Death Valley W TE 1 HWY H Y 16 W 9 S E T H A T TE T A A E T S ST H S T U W A S Y T H 4 Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge E W 0 Y H 9 W 3 Y 1 6 Funeral Mountains Wilderness STATE HWY 190 157 WY E H TAT STATE HWY 190 S 6 1 Argus Range Wilderness Y 04 W 6 Toiyabe National Forest Y H HW E E T AT A ST T U S S H W Y 9 5 Pahrump B 72 U N. Las Vegas 3 S 167 Y 1 STATE HWY 147 STATE HWY HW 0 E 6 T Y TA S W Surprise Canyon Wilderness H E Las Vegas Resting Spring Range Wilderness T STATE HWY 159 A T Death Valley National Park S S Winchester T A T S E TA T H E W H STATE HWY 593 W 3 Paradise Y E. Las Vegas S 5 Y T 1 1 1 5 A 9 4 7 T Y 6 E Y W 8 H HW 4 S W Y 0 STATE HWY 152 U 6 H 1 8 60 N Y 7 E 1 T W e A Y H T v Blue Diamond W S Argus Range Wilderness C E H T a A Henderson E 46 a d T HWY 1 T TE S STA A l a U T i f S US HWY 93 S Nopah Range Wilderness o H Y 466 W US HW r Arden Y n I 515 93 ia Shoshone Boulder City Mount Wilson Wilderness Sloan Manly Peak Wilderness Ibex Wilderness South Nopah Range Wilderness Pahrump Valley Wilderness I 15 Tecopa 5 9 S T Y AT E Goodsprings W S U L H T I A S N TE E S HW H R U Y W a D 165 a Y ST 9 AT 3 n E H d WY 16 a 1 Jean o z v Trona i e r N North Mesquite Mountains Wilderness A
    [Show full text]
  • Naomi S. Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
    The California Deserts: Plant Life at the Extremes Naomi S. Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Red Pass, Death Valley NP Eastern Kern County, California Western Mojave Desert 29 million acres (45,000 sq mi), or 28% of California's landmass. GIS layer source: Omernick ecoregions level 3 Great Basin Mojave Sonoran A Conspiracy of Extremes Bruce Pavlick- 2008 The California Deserts - Topography: 14,246 to -279 ft. - Geology: Limestone, granite, sand dunes - Temperature: below freezing to 134°F (1913) - Changing history over the past 12,000 years - Transition to modern desert complete by 8,500 to 5,000 years ago Krascheninnikovia lanata (winterfat) “Water, water, water....There is no shortage of water in the desert but exactly the right amount, a perfect ratio of water to rock, water to sand, insuring that wide free open, generous spacing among plants and animals, homes and towns and cities, which makes the arid West so different from any other part of the nation. There is no lack of water here unless you try to establish a city where no city should be.” ― Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness Dutch Cleanser Mine, Red Rock Canyon SP Desert Flora - 2377 taxa native to desert (37% of the CA flora) - 785 taxa that do not occur elsewhere in CA (33%) - 232 naturalized taxa (9%) when compared CA (17%) Sources Desert Jepson Manual (2002) Jepson e-flora (2017) Pavlick (2008) Hesperocallis undulata (desert lily) Topographic diversity= species diversity Great Basin 1363 Taxa Mojave 1409 Taxa Sonoran 709 Taxa Remarkable Flora Dr. Frank Vasek’s students circling King Clone on April 1, 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of the Lower Carson Slough Population of Amargosa Niterwort Near Death Valley Junction, California 2010 – 2011
    Monitoring of the Lower Carson Slough Population of Amargosa Niterwort near Death Valley Junction, California 2010 – 2011 Bureau of Land Management California State Office Sacramento, California January 17, 2012 Contents Preface ......................................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Objective of this Monitoring Study ............................................................................................................... 1 Sampling Objective ................................................................................................................................... 7 2010 Monitoring and Changes to the Initial Study Design ........................................................................... 7 2011 Monitoring and Further Changes to the Study Design ...................................................................... 15 Data Analysis and Results ........................................................................................................................... 17 Weather and Groundwater Information ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WOOD ANATOMY of CHENOPODIACEAE (AMARANTHACEAE S
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 33 (2), 2012: 205–232 WOOD ANATOMY OF CHENOPODIACEAE (AMARANTHACEAE s. l.) Heike Heklau1, Peter Gasson2, Fritz Schweingruber3 and Pieter Baas4 SUMMARY The wood anatomy of the Chenopodiaceae is distinctive and fairly uni- form. The secondary xylem is characterised by relatively narrow vessels (<100 µm) with mostly minute pits (<4 µm), and extremely narrow ves- sels (<10 µm intergrading with vascular tracheids in addition to “normal” vessels), short vessel elements (<270 µm), successive cambia, included phloem, thick-walled or very thick-walled fibres, which are short (<470 µm), and abundant calcium oxalate crystals. Rays are mainly observed in the tribes Atripliceae, Beteae, Camphorosmeae, Chenopodieae, Hab- litzieae and Salsoleae, while many Chenopodiaceae are rayless. The Chenopodiaceae differ from the more tropical and subtropical Amaran- thaceae s.str. especially in their shorter libriform fibres and narrower vessels. Contrary to the accepted view that the subfamily Polycnemoideae lacks anomalous thickening, we found irregular successive cambia and included phloem. They are limited to long-lived roots and stem borne roots of perennials (Nitrophila mohavensis) and to a hemicryptophyte (Polycnemum fontanesii). The Chenopodiaceae often grow in extreme habitats, and this is reflected by their wood anatomy. Among the annual species, halophytes have narrower vessels than xeric species of steppes and prairies, and than species of nitrophile ruderal sites. Key words: Chenopodiaceae, Amaranthaceae s.l., included phloem, suc- cessive cambia, anomalous secondary thickening, vessel diameter, vessel element length, ecological adaptations, xerophytes, halophytes. INTRODUCTION The Chenopodiaceae in the order Caryophyllales include annual or perennial herbs, sub- shrubs, shrubs, small trees (Haloxylon ammodendron, Suaeda monoica) and climbers (Hablitzia, Holmbergia).
    [Show full text]
  • Amargosa River Expert Bioblitz April 7-9 , 2017 Final Report
    Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz April 7-9th, 2017 Final Report Photo credit: Janine Knapp Please cite this document as: Parker, S.S., B.S. Cohen, N. Fraga, B. Brown, J. Cole, W. Chatfield-Taylor, K. Guadalupe, G.B. Pauly, D. Cooper, and M. Ordeñana. 2017. Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz. Unpublished Report. The Nature Conservancy. Los Angeles, California. 50 pp. ii Report Contributors: Sophie S. Parker The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Brian S. Cohen The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Naomi Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden [email protected] Brian Brown Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Jeffrey Cole Pasadena City College [email protected] Will Chatfield-Taylor [email protected] Kevin Guadalupe Nevada Department of Wildlife [email protected] Gregory B. Pauly Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Daniel Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. [email protected] Miguel Ordeñana Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] iii Acknowledgements We thank our agency partners at the Bureau of Land Management, particularly C. Otahal, who co-organized the Amargosa River BioBlitz. We also thank the Amargosa Conservancy for supporting the collection efforts, and private land owners B. Brown of China Ranch and S. Sorrells of Shoshone Village for hosting volunteers on their property. iv Table of Contents I. Introduction and Context: Amargosa Watershed Conservation .............................................. 1 II. What is an Expert BioBlitz? ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of the Literature Reports for the Screening of Vascular Plants, Algae, Fungi and Non- Arthropod Invertebrates for the Presence of Ecdysteroids
    COMPILATION OF THE LITERATURE REPORTS FOR THE SCREENING OF VASCULAR PLANTS, ALGAE, FUNGI AND NON- ARTHROPOD INVERTEBRATES FOR THE PRESENCE OF ECDYSTEROIDS Compiled by Laurie Dinan and René Lafont Biophytis, Sorbonne Université, Campus P&M Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France. Version 6: 24/10/2019 Important notice: This database has been designed as a tool to help the scientific community in research on ecdysteroids. The authors wish it to be an evolving system and would encourage other researchers to submit new data, additional publications, proposals for modifications or comments to the authors for inclusion. All new material will be referenced to its contributor. Reproduction of the material in this database in its entirety is not permitted. Reproduction of parts of the database is only permitted under the following conditions: • reproduction is for personal use, for teaching and research, but not for distribution to others • reproduction is not for commercial use • the origin of the material is indicated in the reproduction • we should be notified in advance to allow us to document that the reproduction is being made Where data are reproduced in published texts, they should be acknowledged by the reference: Lafont R., Harmatha J., Marion-Poll F., Dinan L., Wilson I.D.: The Ecdysone Handbook, 3rd edition, on-line, http://ecdybase.org Illustrations may not under any circumstances be used in published texts, commercial or otherwise, without previous written permission of the author(s). Please notify Laurie Dinan ([email protected]) of any errors or additional literature sources. © 2007: Laurence Dinan and René Lafont CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan Endangered and Species Nevada
    RECOVERYPLAN FOR THE ENDANGEREDAND THREATENED SPECIES OF&H MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared by Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF ASH MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared By Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~FP2 3 ‘:XN Date This plan covers the following federally listed species in Ash Meadows, Nevada and California: Devil’s Hole pupfish, Warm Springs pupfish, Ash Meadows Arnargosa pupfish, Ash Meadows speckled dace, Ash Meadows naucorid, Ash Meadows blazing star, Ash Meadows ivesia, Ainargosa niterwort, Spring-loving centaury, Ash Meadows sunray, Ash Meadows inilk-vetch, and Ash Meadows guxnplant. THIS IS THE COMPLETED ASH MEADOWS SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES (AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS) WHO PLAYED THE KEY ROLE IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS, AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES, AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 123 pp. Additional copies may be obtained from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301-492-6403 1-800-582-3421 : ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This plan results from the efforts of many who spent considerable time and energy to prevent the destruction of Ash Meadows and the extinction of its diverse endemic biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Pahrump Valley Winery 9
    PAHRUMP VALLEY WINERY/NEVADA WINE CELLARS REVISED VERSION (4) 9 – 1- 16 COVER Pahrump Valley Winery Offering Award-winning winery business an hour from Las Vegas! COVER PAGE If you’re surprised to learn: that just 50 minutes from Las Vegas is a winery with more than 430 national awards; that there is an opportunity to open a “tasting room” location on or near the famed Las Vegas Strip, and that you have potential access to more than 43 million new customers - hold onto your corkscrews, this offer will have you singing Viva Las Vegas! Gladstein Group (logo) For more information or to schedule a showing contact: Sam Gladstein: 702-992-7657; [email protected] Price available on request. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Located a 50-minute scenic drive from the famed Las Vegas Strip in Pahrump, Nevada, the Pahrump Valley Winery is owned and operated, since 2003, by Bill and Gretchen Loken. The owners have invested more than $1.7 million on renovation, expansion and fixed assets since 2005. Pahrump Valley Winery generates the vast majority of its revenue through the sale of bottled wine directly to consumers via its tasting room, and through food and beverage sales via its Symphony’s Restaurant. The Pahrump Valley Winery wine portfolio includes three brands produced from grapes grown on-property along with grapes purchased from Nevada and California growers. The wines have received more than 430 national awards. Pahrump Valley Winery and its Symphony’s Restaurant have a loyal following among Las Vegas and Southern Nevada residents in addition to national and international visitors who frequent the Las Vegas Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/794370; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 1 Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing 2 Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l. 3 4 Diego F. Morales-Briones1*, Gudrun Kadereit2, Delphine T. Tefarikis2, Michael J. Moore3, 5 Stephen A. Smith4, Samuel F. Brockington5, Alfonso Timoneda5, Won C. Yim6, John C. 6 Cushman6, Ya Yang1* 7 8 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 9 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 10 2 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099, Mainz, 11 Germany 12 3 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, 13 OH 44074-1097, USA 14 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University 15 Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA 16 5 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 17 3EA, United Kingdom 18 6 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89577, 19 USA 20 21 * Correspondence to be sent to: Diego F. Morales-Briones and Ya Yang. Department of Plant and 22 Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA, 23 Telephone: +1 612-625-6292 (YY) Email: [email protected]; [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/794370; this version posted March 13, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM a Action a Presentation Presentation & Action II Department: Natural Resources Office Category: June 5,2007 Contact: Dr
    NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM a Action a Presentation Presentation & Action II Department: Natural Resources Office Category: June 5,2007 Contact: Dr. James Marble Phone: 482-7238 Continued from meeting of: Return to: Natural Resources Office I Location: Tonopah Phone: 482-7238 -- Action requested: (Include what, with whom, when, where, why, how much ($) and terms) Approval of a service contract for BYU to conduct integrated geophysical investigations of shallow groundwater conditions near Ash Meadows, Nevada. Funding for this work is provided by a federal earmark grant through the National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy. Funds are approved and currently available. Complete description of requested action: (Include, if applicable, background, impact, long-term commitment, existing county policy, hture goals, obtained by competitive bid, accountability measures) Nye County has received federal funding approved to conduct a Groundwater Evaluation in hydrographic basins in southern Nye County. The proposed work will focus on two Nye County objectives: 1) determine the best method(s) for surface geophysical estimation of depth to shallow groundwater near the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Rehge (AMNWR), and 2) investigate the geologic framework of the shallow subsurface across the Gravity Fault near the AMNWR. Work Element 1 of the approved work plan includes water resources characterization and monitoring of groundwater in the Pahrump Valley and Amargosa Desert, respectively. The geophysical survey work by BYU will further quantify the water resources in Amargosa Desert and the potential impacts of existing and future water withdrawals with respect to Devils Hole, existing water users in the basin, and future water development activities.
    [Show full text]