DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Test Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Test Program The Space Congress® Proceedings 1973 (10th) Technology Today and Tomorrow Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Space Test Program Neal T. Anderson Project Officer, HQ SAMSO/Spaee Test Program, Los Angeles, CA 90009 Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Anderson, Neal T., "Space Test Program" (1973). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 4. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1973-10th/session-6/4 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPACE TEST PROGRAM Neal T. Anderson, Capt, USAF Project Officer HQ SAMSO/Spaee Test Program Los Angeles, CA 90009 ABSTRACT The Department of Defense Space Test Program is a certain operational payloads. The only limitation unique organization dedicated to stimulating space- on this charter is that the payloads must not be related technology by providing launch and orbital authorized their own means of spaceflight. The support for research and development payloads. Program was never intended to be a launch agency This paper delineates program management techniques, for the large space programs. past accomplishments, and current activities. The benefit to the DOD is discussed. To achieve this objective a governing philosophy was established which required the Program to: INTRODUCTION • be comprehensive in scope In large measure the military power of the United • select and support the most States depends upon the possession of space systems beneficial payloads which are products of superior technology. To maintain a superior technological base and thereby • minimize individual mission fully exploit the potential of space, a broadly costs so as to maximize the based research, development, test, and evaluation number of missions function is required. • minimize the lead-time between As the military space program matured in the mid- payload identification and 1960s, high management levels in the Department of launch Defense recognized that the timely development of technology was being hindered by the lack of an on- The management procedures which evolved early in orbit research and test capability. Basic research the Program's history are in accordance with this of the space environment was being successfully philosophy. Higher management levels have main­ pursued by the Air Force's Office of Aerospace tained streamlined but effective control, while the Research (OAR). But the availability of space- Program Office is allowed to exercise decentralized flight support to developmental and pre-operational and efficient management techniques. The following payloads was largely non-existent. The stimulation sections of this paper will illustrate that the of all areas of technological development depended Program is achieving its objective by operating in upon an organized capability to select high quality the manner outlined above. payloads and insure prompt spa ceflight support. The embodiment of this capability had to be a low cost, rapidly responsive, flexible program. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT In May 1965, the Director of Defense Research and Space-related Research and Development activities, Engineering authorized the establishment of the while predominantly performed in the Air Force, are Space Experiments Support Program (SESP). Tri- widely distributed throughout the DOD. To stimu­ service in nature, the Air Force was designated the late this broad technological base, the opportunity executive agency. Within Air Force Systems Command to participate in the Space Test Program Is offered (AFSC), a Program Office was established at the to all DOD and government agencies. Under certain Space Systems Division (now the Space and Missile circumstances industry and foreign governments may Systems Organization), Los Angeles, California. also obtain the management and technical services Originally chartered to support Advanced Develop­ of the Program. ment (6.3) and Engineering Development (6.10 pay- loads, SESP's scope was increased in 1968 to in­ As stated in the Introduction, the Space Test clude the Basic Research (6.1) and Exploratory Program is a DOD program for which the Air Force Development (6.2) payloads previously supported by is the executive agency. To avoid any debilita­ OAR. In June 1971 the program was redesignated the ting effects of potential differences between the Space Test Program, participating organizations, representatives of all payload sponsoring agencies are involved in major The objective of the Space Test Program is the time­ program decisions. The Army, Navy, and Air Force ly spa ceflight of DOD research, development, and are, in essence, voting members at all meetings 6-1 which approve or prioritize payloads, allocate re­ prioritization Include: sources, or determine schedules. A joint Army, Navy and Air Force manual specifies Space Test • Urgency - immediate, near-term, Program management procedures. Final authority for or far-term usage payload and spaceflight plan approval rests in the Office of the Director of Defense Research and • Mission Orientation - operational, Engineering (ODDR&E). subsystem development, general research The most difficult task in the overall management of the program is the selection and priorit ization • Programmatic - essential, Important, of payloads. Absolutely crucial to effective ad­ secondary to sponsoring program's vancement of technology is the launch of high qual­ goals ity, directly beneficial payloads. The task is complicated by the fact that proposed payloads can This Master List is approved by ODDR&E prior to originate In any one of dozens of laboratories and transmittal to Hq SAMSO/DIE for detailing flight organizations. They can fall within any of four planning. categories ranging from basic research to engineer­ ing development. With 60-70 payloads in the program at any given time, the process of approving and prioritizing The payload submission and priorItization flow is payloads represents a major effort. It has been Illustrated in Figure 1* Each sponsoring agency efficiently and successfully conducted at the var­ (i.e., Army, Navy, Air Force, ARPA, NASA, etc.) is ious levels by assigning the task to knowledgeable responsible for insuring that the proposed payload individuals and small cooperative groups. Large actually requires spaceflight and that funding sup­ standing committees inundated with paperwork are port to build the payload is available. The spon­ not utilized. soring agency must then prioritize the payloads in accordance with its own Internal procedures and Upon receipt of the Master List of Accepted Pay- submit an Integrated list to Hq USAF, Deputy Chief loads, the Planning Function of the Space Test of Staff, Research and Development (DCS/R&D). Program prepares Spaceflight Plans delineating Within DCS/R&D, the Director of Space with the performance, schedules, and costs for a variety of assistance of the payload sponsors combines the missions. Once a Spaceflight Plan is approved, various lists to establish a Master List of Accept­ the detailed planning, procurement, and engineer­ ed Bayloads. Factors utilized in the overall ing activities which follow are solely the Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering_____ Proposed Master List of P Approved Master List, Proposed Flight Plans Approved Flight Plans Approved Master List Hq USAF/DCS R&D Proposed Director of Space Flight Plans Approved Flight Plans Payloads Laboratories Centers Organizations Figure 1 Payload Submission and Spaceflight Plan Approval Flow 6-2 responsibility of the Space Test Program Office. costs due to changes in payload requirements or Located at the Space and Missile Systems Organiza­ late delivery. The last feature assures that the tion (SAMSO) in Los Angeles, it is the overall DOD payload agencies adequately define their require­ management agency with complete authority to plan, ments. It also assures that they closely manage organize, and direct the progress of each launch. their activities. It does so by funding and procuring boosters, spacecraft, and payload integration. It also ob­ tains launch and orbital support as required. PAST ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Space Test Program is also the overall DOD On 29 June 1967, five months after contractual go- management agency for the assignment of payloads ahead, a Thor/Burner II lifted off from Vandenberg to secondary (excess) capability on launch vehicles AFS carrying an Army satellite and a Navy satellite. and spacecraft of other DOD programs. It is also Successful injection into a 2100 NM orbit by the the central agency for requesting secondary payload specially developed apogee insertion system marked space on NASA programs. In performing this func­ the completion of the first primary Space Test tion, the Program Office maintains current informa­ Program mission. Slightly over a month later, a tion on the secondary payload capabilities of all classified Air Force satellite was launched carry­ DOD and NASA programs. ing three additional payloads representing the first secondary Space Test Program mission. The Due to the large number and variety of the payloads Program 1 s complete launch history is presented in flown, the Program is not expected to manage pay- Table 1. load development. A vast increase in personnel, monetary resources, technical support, and manage­ In the late
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AERONET Annual Review
    AERONET Annual Review Colleagues, your AERONET sun and sky scanning network has continued to be a valued resource for basic aerosol research, satellite validation, global and regional aerosol model validation and synergism with field campaigns, in situ and RS observations. Following is my tome on our current state, issues we are facing and plans for the future. 1.0 Introduction and News 2.0 Calibration 3.0 Issues 4.0 Future Developments 5.0 Related Initiatives **Note** Wayne Newcomb, our good friend and primary person responsible for keeping instruments functional network wide and maintaining the swapout rotation through the system among many other things, has made progress in his battle with cancer. After two weeks on life support and multiple surgeries, he’s breathing on his own, talking and is annoyed that he wasn’t able to vote. We’re encouraged by his determination and strength. We need everyone’s help to fill the void left by his absence. We especially need everyone’s support to keep their equipment running in the field. Please see the proactive site manager section under ‘3.0 Issues’. 1.0 Introduction and News I’m very happy to announce the third AERONET workshop and conference to be held in mid August 2009 at or near Hangzhou, China. Although the details will be forthcoming in the months ahead, the plan is for a combined technical and training forum and aerosol science conference that will emphasize surface, airborne and satellite research with several themes. Our host and organizer will be Prof. Jiang Hong of Zhejiang Forestry University and facilitated by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Space) Barriers for 50 Years: the Past, Present, and Future of the Dod Space Test Program
    SSC17-X-02 Breaking (Space) Barriers for 50 Years: The Past, Present, and Future of the DoD Space Test Program Barbara Manganis Braun, Sam Myers Sims, James McLeroy The Aerospace Corporation 2155 Louisiana Blvd NE, Suite 5000, Albuquerque, NM 87110-5425; 505-846-8413 [email protected] Colonel Ben Brining USAF SMC/ADS 3548 Aberdeen Ave SE, Kirtland AFB NM 87117-5776; 505-846-8812 [email protected] ABSTRACT 2017 marks the 50th anniversary of the Department of Defense Space Test Program’s (STP) first launch. STP’s predecessor, the Space Experiments Support Program (SESP), launched its first mission in June of 1967; it used a Thor Burner II to launch an Army and a Navy satellite carrying geodesy and aurora experiments. The SESP was renamed to the Space Test Program in July 1971, and has flown over 568 experiments on over 251 missions to date. Today the STP is managed under the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) Advanced Systems and Development Directorate (SMC/AD), and continues to provide access to space for DoD-sponsored research and development missions. It relies heavily on small satellites, small launch vehicles, and innovative approaches to space access to perform its mission. INTRODUCTION Today STP continues to provide access to space for DoD-sponsored research and development missions, Since space first became a viable theater of operations relying heavily on small satellites, small launch for the Department of Defense (DoD), space technologies have developed at a rapid rate. Yet while vehicles, and innovative approaches to space access.
    [Show full text]
  • ESPA Ring Datasheet
    PAYLOAD ADAPTERS | ESPA ESPA THE EVOLVED SECONDARY PAYLOAD ADAPTER ESPA mounts to the standard NSSL (formerly EELV) interface bolt pattern (Atlas V, Falcon 9, Delta IV, OmegA, Vulcan, Courtesy of Lockheed Martin New Glenn) and is a drop-in component in the launch stack. Small payloads mount to ESPA ports featuring either a Ø15-inch bolt circle with 24 fasteners or a 4-point mount with pads at each corner of a 15-inch square; both of these interfaces have become small satellite standards. ESPA is qualified to carry 567 lbs (257 kg), and a Heavy interface Courtesy of NASA (with Ø5/16” fastener hardware) has been introduced with a capacity of 991 lbs (450 kg). All small satellite mass capabilities require the center of gravity (CG) to be within 20 inches (50.8 cm) of the ESPA port surface. Alternative configurations can be accommodated. ESPA GRANDE ESPA Grande is a more capable version of ESPA with Ø24-inch ports; the ring height is typically 42 inches. The Ø24-inch port has been qualified by test to Courtesy of ORBCOMM & Sierra Nevada Corp. carry small satellites up to 1543 lb (700 kg). ESPA ESPA IS ADAPTABLE TO UNIQUE MISSION REQUIREMENTS • The Air Force’s STP-1 mission delivered multiple small satellites on an Atlas V. • NASA’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS): ESPA was the spacecraft hub for the LCROSS shepherding satellite in 2009. • ORBCOMM Generation 2 (OG2) launched stacks of two and three ESPA Grandes on two different Falcon 9 missions and in total deployed 17 satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceflight, Inc. General Payload Users Guide
    Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Spaceflight, Inc. General Payload Users Guide 3415 S. 116th St, Suite 123 Tukwila, WA 98168 866.204.1707 spaceflightindustries.com i Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Document Revision History Rev Approval Changes ECN No. Sections / Approved Pages CM Date A 2011‐09‐16 Initial Release Updated electrical interfaces and launch B 2012‐03‐30 environments C 2012‐07‐18 Official release Updated electrical interfaces and launch D 2013‐03‐05 environments, reformatted, and added to sections Updated organization and formatting, E 2014‐04‐15 added content on SHERPA, Mini‐SHERPA and ISS launches, updated RPA CG F 2015‐05‐22 Overall update ii Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Document Overview ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Spaceflight Overview ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Hardware Overview ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Mission Management Overview .................................................................................................... 10 2 Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • ULA Rideshare Capabilities for Providing Low-Cost Access to Space
    United Launch Alliance Rideshare Capabilities for Providing Low-Cost Access to Space Keith Karuntzos United Launch Alliance PO Box 3788, MIS C4102 Centennial, CO 80155-3788 303-269-5499 [email protected] Abstract-United Launch Alliance (ULA) has a long history of REFERENCES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 providing launch services to high-value payloads for a variety BIOGRAPHY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 of customers, including the US Department of Defense, the National Reconnaissance Office, NASA, and commercial customers. These missions have deployed a wide variety of capabilities into Earth orbit and beyond, such as navigation, 1. VVHAT IS RIDESHARE? communication, R&D, observation, and science, all which have Since the dawn of the space age, spacecraft have often provided us with a tremendous amount of knowledge about Earth and our solar system. The majority of these spacecraft shared launch services with one another while being has been launched as primary payloads, and used the full delivered into space. This approach has normally been done capability of the launch vehicle; yet there is a lower-cost to support spacecraftmuch smaller than the primary payload alternative for achieving similar mission objectives: rideshare. it is launching with. By designing launch services in this manner, spacecraft operators were able to deliver more Rideshare is the approach of sharing available launch vehicle payloads to orbit for a fraction of the cost of a full-up launch performance and volume margins with two or more spacecraft service. that would otherwise go underutilized by the spacecraft community. This allows spacecraft customers the opportunity This method of launching multiple payloads into orbit on a to get their spacecraft to orbit and beyond in an inexpensive single launch vehicle is called rideshare.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • National Reconnaissance Office Review and Redaction Guide
    NRO Approved for Release 16 Dec 2010 —Tep-nm.T7ymqtmthitmemf- (u) National Reconnaissance Office Review and Redaction Guide For Automatic Declassification Of 25-Year-Old Information Version 1.0 2008 Edition Approved: Scott F. Large Director DECL ON: 25x1, 20590201 DRV FROM: NRO Classification Guide 6.0, 20 May 2005 NRO Approved for Release 16 Dec 2010 (U) Table of Contents (U) Preface (U) Background 1 (U) General Methodology 2 (U) File Series Exemptions 4 (U) Continued Exemption from Declassification 4 1. (U) Reveal Information that Involves the Application of Intelligence Sources and Methods (25X1) 6 1.1 (U) Document Administration 7 1.2 (U) About the National Reconnaissance Program (NRP) 10 1.2.1 (U) Fact of Satellite Reconnaissance 10 1.2.2 (U) National Reconnaissance Program Information 12 1.2.3 (U) Organizational Relationships 16 1.2.3.1. (U) SAF/SS 16 1.2.3.2. (U) SAF/SP (Program A) 18 1.2.3.3. (U) CIA (Program B) 18 1.2.3.4. (U) Navy (Program C) 19 1.2.3.5. (U) CIA/Air Force (Program D) 19 1.2.3.6. (U) Defense Recon Support Program (DRSP/DSRP) 19 1.3 (U) Satellite Imagery (IMINT) Systems 21 1.3.1 (U) Imagery System Information 21 1.3.2 (U) Non-Operational IMINT Systems 25 1.3.3 (U) Current and Future IMINT Operational Systems 32 1.3.4 (U) Meteorological Forecasting 33 1.3.5 (U) IMINT System Ground Operations 34 1.4 (U) Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Systems 36 1.4.1 (U) Signals Intelligence System Information 36 1.4.2 (U) Non-Operational SIGINT Systems 38 1.4.3 (U) Current and Future SIGINT Operational Systems 40 1.4.4 (U) SIGINT
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 2 May–June 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 European industrial leadership at stake ............................................................................ 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 2 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 2 9th EU-ESA Space Council .......................................................................................... 2 Europe’s Martian ambitions take shape ......................................................................... 2 ESA’s advancements on Planetary Defence Systems ........................................................... 2 ESA prepares for rescuing Humans on Moon .................................................................... 3 ESA’s private partnerships ......................................................................................... 3 ESA’s international cooperation with Japan .................................................................... 3 New EU Parliament, new EU European Space Policy? ......................................................... 3 France reflects on its competitiveness and defence posture in space ...................................... 3 Germany joins consortium to support a European reusable rocket.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Access to ESPA Standard Service
    SSC10-IX-1 Small Satellite Access to ESPA Standard Service Mr. Ted Marrujo DoD Space Test Program (STP), Mission Design 3548 Aberdeen Ave. SE, Kirtland AFB NM 87117; (505) 853-3338 Ted. [email protected] Lt Jake Mathis Space and Missile Systems Center, Launch and Range Systems Wing, Engineering 483 N. Aviation Blvd, Los Angeles AFB, CA; (310) 653-3392 [email protected] Mr. Caleb C. Weiss United Launch Alliance, Mission Integration 12257 S. Wadsworth Blvd, TSB-B7140, Littleton, CO 80125; (303) 977-0843 [email protected] ABSTRACT The DoD Space Test Program (STP), the Air Force Launch and Range Systems Wing (LRSW), and United Launch Alliance (ULA) are teaming up to provide a rideshare service to small satellites (<400lb) using an Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) Secondary Payload Adapter (ESPA). This rideshare service is an opportunity on EELV missions with margin to carry auxiliary payloads (APLs). This paper will define the ESPA, the standard rideshare service provided to APLs, and how APLs can access this service. We will discuss the roles and responsibilities the different government organizations, ULA, and the small satellite provider have in accessing and implementing ESPA Standard Service. In brief, ULA builds the EELV and performs the launch service, LRSW is responsible for developing and acquiring EELVs from ULA, and STP is responsible for identifying and manifesting APLs that meet ESPA Standard Service requirements. We will further define the processes and procedures required to implement ESPA Standard Service to include: how a particular EELV mission is selected to host ESPA Standard Service, the selection process for auxiliary satellites to utilize the capability, the requirements and timelines small satellites must meet to qualify, and the scope of services provided by ULA as part of Standard Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Radiation (SOLRAD) Satellite Summary Table As of 26 March 2004
    Solar Radiation (SOLRAD) Satellite Summary Table as of 26 March 2004 Satellite Name Launch Date Transmitter(s) Vanguard 3 18 September 1959 108.00 Mc/s 30 mW FM/PM IRIG 2, 3, 4 & 5 Explorer 7 13 October 1959 19.9915 Mc/s 660 mW FM/AM IRIG 2, 3, 4 & 5 Solrad Dummy 13 April 1960 Inert Test Article Sun Ray 1 22 June 1960 108.00 Mc/s 40 mW FM/AM IRIG Ch 4 & Ch 5 Sun Ray 2 30 November 1960 (Failure) 108.00 Mc/s 40 mW FM/AM IRIG Ch 4 & Ch 5 here Sun Ray 3 29 June 1961 (Partial failure) 108.00 Mc/s Sun Ray 4 24 January 1962 (Failure) 108.09 Mc/s 100 mW FM/AM Sun Ray 4B 26 April 1962 (Failure) 108.00 Mc/s 100 mW FM/AM 20 inch sp Sun Ray 5 Not Launched Sun Ray 6 15 June 1963 136.890 MHz 100 mW FM/AM SolRad 7A 11 January 1964 136.887 MHz 100 mW FM/AM IRIG Ch 3 to 8 SolRad 7B 9 March 1965 136.800 MHz 100 mW FM/AM IRIG Ch 3 to 8 SolRad 8 19 November 1965 137.41 MHz 1W Stored data playback Explorer 30 136.44 MHz 100mW 24 inch sphere Solar Explorer A 136.53 MHz 100mW SolRad 9 5 March 1968 136.41 MHz 500 mW Stored data playback Explorer 37 136.52 MHz 150 mW Primary RT FM/AM IRIG 3 to 8 Solar Explorer B 137.59 MHz 150 mW RT FM/AM IRIG 3 to 7, 12 PCM SolRad 10 8 July 1971 136.38 MHz 250 mW 5W on cmd TM2 - PCM/PM or Stored Data or Stellrad on cmd Explorer 44 137.71 MHz 250 mW TM1 - PAM/PCM/FM/PM RT analog (chs 4-8, COSPAR Ch 7) Solar Explorer-C and digital PCM (ch 12) SolRad 11A & 14 March 1976 137.44 MHz 5W (11A), 136.53 MHz 5W (11B) SolRad 11B 102.4 bps PCM/BiØ-L/PM convolutional encoded (R=½, k=7) Early X-ray missions Name Vanguard 3 Launch Date 1959 September 18.22 UTC SAO ID 1959 ? (Eta) COSPAR ID 1959-07A Catalog No.
    [Show full text]
  • External Payloads Proposer's Guide to the International Space Station
    SSP 51071 Baseline External Payloads Proposer’s Guide to the International Space Station International Space Station Program Baseline August 2017 National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas This Document Is Uncontrolled When Printed. Verify Current version before use. SSP 51071 Baseline REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release (Reference per SSCD 15774, EFF. 09-29-2017) 10-02-17 Public access authorization obtained via the Document Availability Authorization Control Number: “40352” This Document Is Uncontrolled When Printed. Verify Current Version Before Use. SSP 51071 Baseline TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR OPERATING ON ISS ........................................................ 2-1 2.1 HOW TO GET STARTED ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 ISS FEASIBILITY RESOURCE ACCOMMODATION ASSESSMENT PROCESS ................ 2-2 2.3 WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ............................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 ORGANIZATIONAL ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................ 2-7 2.5 ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES OF PAYLOAD PROVIDERS ................................................... 2-8 3.0 COMMON ACCOMMODATIONS, RESOURCES, AND ENVIRONMENTS
    [Show full text]