DOCSLIB.ORG

Disposal of Low Activity Radioactive Waste

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Disposal of Low Activity Radioactive Waste Disposal of Low Activity Radioactive Waste Proceedings of an International Symposium, Córdoba, Spain, 13–17 December 2004 Organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency hosted by the Government of Spain through the Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos, S.A. and the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear in co-sponsorship with the Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs and in cooperation with the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency DISPOSAL OF LOW ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE © IAEA, 2005 Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy, Wagramer Strasse 5, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. Printed by the IAEA in Austria June 2005 STI/PUB/1224 PROCEEDINGS SERIES DISPOSAL OF LOW ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCEEDINGS OF AN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISPOSAL OF LOW ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE ORGANIZED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY AND HOSTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF SPAIN THROUGH THE EMPRESA NACIONAL DE RESIDUOS RADIACTIVOS, S.A. AND THE CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NUCLEAR IN CO-SPONSORSHIP WITH THE AGENCE NATIONALE POUR LA GESTION DES DÉCHETS RADIOACTIFS AND IN COOPERATION WITH THE OECD NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY, AND HELD IN CÓRDOBA, SPAIN, 13–17 DECEMBER 2004 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 2005 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and will be considered on a case by case basis. Enquiries should be addressed by email to the Publishing Section, IAEA, at [email protected] or by post to: Sales and Promotion Unit, Publishing Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P. O. B o x 1 0 0 A-1400 Vienna Austria fax: +43 1 2600 29302 tel.: +43 1 2600 22417 http://www.iaea.org/books IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data International Symposium on Disposal of Low Activity Radioactive Waste (2004 : Córdoba, Spain) Disposal of low activity radioactive waste : proceedings of an International Symposium on Disposal of Low Activity Radioactive Waste / organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency and hosted by the Government of Spain through the Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos, S.A. … [et al.], and held in Córdoba, 13–17 December 2004. — Vienna : The Agency, 2005. p. ; 24 cm + 1 CD-ROM — (Proceedings series, ISSN 0074–1884) STI/PUB/1224 ISBN 92–0–102905–5 Includes bibliographical references. 1. Radioactive waste disposal — Congresses. 2. Hazardous wastes — Management — Congresses. I. International Atomic Energy Agency. II. Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos (Spain) III. Series: Proceedings series (International Atomic Energy Agency). IAEAL 05–00403 FOREWORD The largest part, by mass and volume, of the radioactive waste created in the operation and decommissioning of nuclear power plants, in the production of nuclear fuel, in the use of radionuclides in medicine, industry and research and as a by-product of various industrial processes, is of low activity. Management solutions exist for some, but not all, of the waste types that can be described as low activity. A new urgency exists in many countries to develop or extend existing arrangements for low activity waste management and disposal because of the ongoing or imminent decommissioning phase of their commercial nuclear power plants. In other countries, the problems associated with the management of the low activity radioactive waste from non-nuclear industries, for example, waste including naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), is becoming more recognized. The subject of low activity radioactive waste management raises several issues of both a philosophical and a technical nature, such as the question of when a waste is to be considered radioactive from a regulatory perspective, the issue of guiding suitable management strategies for waste that is both long lived and present in large volumes and of finding suitable disposal routes for new types of low activity waste. The IAEA organized this international symposium to provide an opportunity for the exchange of information on the subject among its Member States and to look for common approaches to the problems so identified. The symposium explored the subject through five topical sessions: policies and strategies for low activity radioactive waste management and disposal; very low activity waste; low activity radioactive waste from decommissioning; long lived low activity radioactive waste and unique low activity waste. This publication, which constitutes the record of the symposium, includes the opening and closing speeches, the invited papers, the summaries of the discussions during the sessions and during the panel sessions and an executive summary of the symposium. A CD-ROM containing the unedited contributed papers to the symposium can be found at the back of this book. The IAEA gratefully acknowledges the support and generous hospitality of the Government of Spain through its Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos, S.A. (ENRESA) and its Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN). It also acknowledges the support of the French Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs (ANDRA) and of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. EDITORIAL NOTE The Proceedings have been edited by the editorial staff of the IAEA to the extent considered necessary for the reader’s assistance. The views expressed remain, however, the responsibility of the named authors or participants. In addition, the views are not necessarily those of the governments of the nominating Member States or of the nominating organizations. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. The authors are responsible for having obtained the necessary permission for the IAEA to reproduce, translate or use material from sources already protected by copyrights. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. i OPENING SESSION Opening Addresses Y.A. Sokolov . 3 M.-T. Estevan Bolea . 7 Keynote Addresses J.M. Grávalos. 11 J.C. Lentijo . 15 F. Jacq . 19 L. Echávarri . 23 POLICIES AND STRATEGIES FOR LOW ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL (SESSION 1) The management of low activity radioactive waste IAEA guidance and perspectives D. Louvat, J.H. Rowat, J.-M. Potier . 31 Policies and strategy for low activity radioactive waste management in Spain J.M. Redondo García . 43 Management and disposal strategies for low activity waste in the United States of America M.V. Federline . 53 The management of low level waste in France F. Jacq . 71 Policy on management and disposal of low level waste in Japan Y. Kawakami . 87 Management of low activity radioactive waste from Russian nuclear power plants and radiochemical plants P.P. Poluektov, L.P. Sukhanov, Y.V. Glagolenko et al. 95 The Joint Convention and improved management of low activity radioactive waste G.C. Jack . 109 Radioactive waste management in Portugal R. Trindade, I. Paiva, L. Portugal . 119 Panel Statement P. Bredell . 127 Statement J.P. Boyazis . 128 Statement J. Tomás Zerquera. 129 Statement V. Štefula. 130 Discussion: How can existing radioactive waste management strategies better address the needs of countries with limited resources?. 132 VERY LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE (VLLW) (SESSION 2) Very low level waste — the need for a new category of radioactive waste? L. Baekelandt . 141 Disposal of very low level waste and safety assessment M. Dutzer, F. Chastagner, N. Ricquart, F. Duret . 153 Review of low level radioactive waste management in the United Kingdom T. Selby . 165 Management of very low activity radioactive waste in Spain P. Zuloaga . 175 Very low level radioactive waste: Perspective of the European Commission A. Janssens, U. Blohm-Hieber, B. Andrés Ordax . 185 Panel Statement R.L. Jackson. 205 Statement I. Othman . 207 Statement K.-L. Sjöblom . 208 Statement R.L. Zelmer . 210 Discussion: Clearance and VLLW disposal: Competing or complementary approaches? . 211 LOW ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE FROM DECOMMISSIONING (SESSION 3) Overview of decommissioning waste T. Eng, C. Pescatore . 223 Building confidence in decommissioning in France: A national system for managing the associated radioactive waste J. Avérous, E. Chapalain . 235 The management of low level radioactive waste arising from the operation and decommissioning of the nuclear fuel production facilities at NECSA — a South African experience P. Bredell . 245 Present status and plans for disposal of decommissioning
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integration of Resource Recovery Into Current Waste Management Through
    INTEGRATION OF RESOURCE RECOVERY INTO CURRENT WASTE MANAGEMENT THROUGH (ENHANCED) LANDFILL MINING Juan Carlos Hernández Parrodi 1,2,*, Hugo Lucas 3, Marco Gigantino 4, Giovanna Sauve 5, John Laurence Esguerra 6,7, Paul Einhäupl 5,7, Daniel Vollprecht 2, Roland Pomberger 2, Bernd Friedrich 3, Karel Van Acker 5, Joakim Krook 6, Niclas Svensson 6 and Steven Van Passel 7 1 Renewi Belgium SA/NV, NEW-MINE project, 3920 Lommel, Belgium 2 Montanuniversität Leoben, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, 8700 Leoben, Austria 3 RWTH Aachen University, Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling, 52056 Aachen, Germany 4 ETH Zürich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland 5 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Materials Engineering, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 6 Linköping University, Environmental Technology and Management, 58183 Linköping, Sweden 7 Universiteit Antwerpen, Department of Engineering Management, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium Article Info: ABSTRACT Received: Europe has somewhere between 150,000 and 500,000 landfill sites, with an estimat- 1 November 2019 Accepted: ed 90% of them being “non-sanitary” landfills, predating the EU Landfill Directive of 15 November 2019 1999/31/EC. These older landfills tend to be filled with municipal solid waste and Available online: often lack any environmental protection technology. “Doing nothing”, state-of-the- 23 December 2019 art aftercare or remediating them depends largely on technical, societal and eco- Keywords: nomic conditions which vary between countries. Beside “doing nothing” and land- Landfill mining strategies fill aftercare, there are different scenarios in landfill mining, from re-landfilling the Enhanced landfill mining waste into “sanitary landfills” to seizing the opportunity for a combined resource-re- Resource recovery covery and remediation strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance of Compost and Digestate – Experiences from Germany
    Quality assurance of compost and digestate – Experiences from Germany Quality assurance of compost and digestate Experiences from Germany 1 Quality assurance of compost and digestate – Experiences from Germany Imprint Publisher: German Environment Agency Section III 2.4 Waste Technology, Waste Technology Transfer Section I 1.2 International Sustainability Strategies, Policy and Knowledge Transfer Wörlitzer Platz 1 D-06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Authors: Marie Dollhofer (BiPRO GmbH), Elisabeth Zettl (BiPRO GmbH) In cooperation with: Wolfgang Lausterer (Awiplan-PPD GmbH), Ulrich Hommel (Awiplan-PPD GmbH), Tim Hermann (UBA), Katharina Lenz (UBA) On behalf of the German Environment Agency Design: Atelier Hauer + Dörfler GmbH, Berlin Publications as a pdf: www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen Photo credits: BiPRO GmbH, PLANCO-TEC, Shutterstock, Tim Hermann As at July 2017 ISSN 2363-832X This document is a result of the project “Exchange of expe- riences for establishing a system and an organisation for the quality assurance of compost in Bulgaria”. This project was financed by the German Federal Environment Ministry’s Advisory Assistance Programme (AAP) for environmental protection in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia and other countries neigh- bouring the European Union. It was supervised by the Ger- man Environment Agency. The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Waste in Europe — Turning Challenges Into Opportunities
    EEA Report No 04/2020 Bio-waste in Europe — turning challenges into opportunities ISSN 1977-8449 EEA Report No 04/2020 Bio-waste in Europe — turning challenges into opportunities Cover design: EEA Cover photo: © Brendan Killeen Layout: Rosendahls a/s Legal notice The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the European Commission or other institutions of the European Union. Neither the European Environment Agency nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. Brexit notice The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union did not affect the production of this report. Data reported by the United Kingdom are included in all analyses and assessments contained herein, unless otherwise indicated. Copyright notice © European Environment Agency, 2020 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 ISBN 978-92-9480-223-1 ISSN 1977-8449 doi:10.2800/630938 European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 1050 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel.: +45 33 36 71 00 Internet: eea.europa.eu Enquiries: eea.europa.eu/enquiries Contents Contents Authors and acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 4 Key messages .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litter Legislation: a Toolkit for Policymakers
    Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya. Acknowledgments This report was developed by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It was researched, drafted, and produced by Carl Bruch, Kathryn Mengerink, Elana Harrison, Davonne Flanagan, Isabel Carey, Thomas Casey, Meggan Davis, Elizabeth Hessami, Joyce Lombardi, Norka Michel- en, Colin Parts, Lucas Rhodes, Nikita West, and Sofia Yazykova. Within UNEP, Heidi Savelli, Arnold Kreilhuber, and Petter Malvik oversaw the development of the report. The authors express their appreciation to the peer reviewers, including Catherine Ayres, Patricia Beneke, Angela Howe, Ileana Lopez, Lara Ognibene, David Vander Zwaag, and Judith Wehrli. Cover photo: Plastics floating in the ocean The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Environment Programme. © 2016. United Nations Environment Programme. Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Key Policy Framework Instruments
    1 2 3 The key policy framework instruments are: Thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, COM(2005) 666 final -sets as long-term goal for the EU to become a recycling society that seeks to avoid waste and uses waste as a resource: -It set 7 actions how to reach these objectives, for example, step up enforcement, modernise waste legislation, develop recycling standards and improve prevention. -The Strategy played an important role in guiding policy development and has contributed to significant improvement in waste management. The Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (COM(2011) 571) •outlines how to transform Europe's economy into a sustainable one by 2050, how to increase resource productivity and decouple economic growth from resource use and its environmental impact. It illustrates how policies interrelate and build on each other. •It sets various actions (2012-2014) to be taken by the Commission to treat waste as a resource, including the review of the waste targets 7th Environmental Action Programme, 2013 – 2020 - Puts focus to turning waste into a resource including by phasing out landfilling. Action Plan towards Circular economy •Waste management plays a central role in the transition to a circular economy. The plan requires the Commission to take measures: •Revise waste targets (proposal adopted in December 2015); step up enforcement; communication on waste to energy (adopted in January 2017); disseminate good practices on 4 separate collection (specific study available on DG Environment website). 4 5 EU waste legislation objectives are defined in Article of the Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC: • Waste prevention – has been and continues to be the first and most important objective of the EU waste management policy.
    [Show full text]
  • PPT Presentation As
    3rd Baltic Biowaste Conference, 23/24 Nov. 2011, Vilnius "Landfill Directive, ABPR, End-of-Waste, Recycling targets, resources strategy - Follow ups of EU Legislation for national organic waste management strategies and policies" Florian Amlinger, Compost – Consulting & Development, Austria European Legislation and Policy on Biowaste Landfill Directive, ABPR, End-of- EU Landfill Directive; (EC) Nr. 1999/31 Waste, Recycling targets, resources EU Waste Framework Directive; (EC) Nr. 2008/98 Recycling Targets– Biowaste strategy - Follow ups of EU Legislation Waste Hierearchy & Life Cycle Thinking (!) Perspectives Perspectives Perspectives Perspectives - - - for national organic waste management - End of Waste for Compost & Digestate EU EU EU EU Communication on the Management of Bio-Waste in the EU strategies and policies COM(2011) 571 final EU Climate Change Programme Fertiliser Regulation (EC) Nr. 2003/2003 Animal By-Products Regulation (EC) Nr. 1069/2009 REACH – EU Chemicals Regulation (EC) Nr. 1907/2006 IPPC / Industrial Emission Directive; 2(EC) Nr. 2010/75 Renewable Energy Directive (EC) Nr. 28/2009 Florian Amlinger, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe COM(2011) 571 final Compost – Consulting & Development EU Soil Protection Strategy COM(2006) 231 final Austria Biowaste Management, Biowaste Management, Biowaste Management, Biowaste Management, Compost - Consulting & Development ECN Compost - Consulting & Development ECN Florian Amlinger, MSc. Florian Amlinger, MSc. Sheet 2 EU-Landfill Directive 1999/31/EC The Waste Framework Directive Reduction of biodegradable waste from landfill Recycling Targets … 50% Recycling until 2020 at least for . Paper, Metals, Plastic and Glass from households or similar sources in % of biodegradable waste 1995 Perspectives Perspectives Perspectives Perspectives Accounting method - - - 25% 2006/10 50% 2009/13 65% 2016/20 - Draft COM Decision of "Establishing rules and calculation methods for verifying compliance with Recycling targets set in EU EU EU EU Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management
    10 Waste Management Coordinating Lead Authors: Jean Bogner (USA) Lead Authors: Mohammed Abdelrafie Ahmed (Sudan), Cristobal Diaz (Cuba), Andre Faaij (The Netherlands), Qingxian Gao (China), Seiji Hashimoto (Japan), Katarina Mareckova (Slovakia), Riitta Pipatti (Finland), Tianzhu Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Luis Diaz (USA), Peter Kjeldsen (Denmark), Suvi Monni (Finland) Review Editors: Robert Gregory (UK), R.T.M. Sutamihardja (Indonesia) This chapter should be cited as: Bogner, J., M. Abdelrafie Ahmed, C. Diaz, A. Faaij, Q. Gao, S. Hashimoto, K. Mareckova, R. Pipatti, T. Zhang, Waste Management, In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Waste Management Chapter 10 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................. 587 10.5 Policies and measures: waste management and climate ....................................................... 607 10.1 Introduction .................................................... 588 10.5.1 Reducing landfill CH4 emissions .......................607 10.2 Status of the waste management sector ..... 591 10.5.2 Incineration and other thermal processes for waste-to-energy ...............................................608 10.2.1 Waste generation ............................................591 10.5.3 Waste minimization, re-use and
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Assessing the Perception and Reality of Arguments 1
    1 ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION AND REALITY OF ARGUMENTS 2 AGAINST THERMAL WASTE TREATMENT PLANTS IN TERMS OF 3 PROPERTY PRICES 4 5 K.J.O. Phillips, P.J. Longhurst, S.T. Wagland* 6 7 Centre for Energy and Resource Technology, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield 8 University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK 9 ______ 10 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 (0) 1234 750111 extn 2404; Fax: +44 (0) 1234 11 751671 12 E – mail address: [email protected] 1 1 Abstract 2 The thermal processing of waste materials, although considered to be an essential part 3 of waste management, is often sharply contested in the UK. Arguments such as 4 health, depletion of resources, cost, noise, odours, traffic movement and house prices 5 are often cited as reasons against the development of such facilities. This study aims 6 to review the arguments and identify any effect on property prices due to the public 7 perception of the plant. A selection of existing energy from waste (EfW) facilities in 8 the UK, operational for at least 7 years, was selected and property sales data, within 5 9 km of the sites, was acquired and analysed in detail. The locations of the properties 10 were calculated in relation to the plant using GIS software (ArcGIS) and the distances 11 split into 5 zones ranging from 0-5 km from the site. The local property sale prices, 12 normalised against the local house price index, were compared in two time periods, 13 before and after the facility became operational, across each of the 5 zones.
    [Show full text]
  • New Bespoke Radioactive Substances Activity Permit (Burial of Radioactive Waste) Guidance Notes
    - How to apply for an environmental permit Part RSR-B5 – New bespoke radioactive substances activity permit (burial of radioactive waste) Guidance notes Please read these guidance notes carefully before We refer to this as the General Requirements for Authorisation you fill in the form. (GRA) for convenience. We have added some specific references to this in the guidance below. Complete part RSR-B5 if you are applying for a new bespoke permit for a radioactive substances activity involving the We strongly advise you to read that guidance and the burial of radioactive waste. You will also need to complete guidance to this form, and then to discuss your proposals with RSR-B3 if you wish to dispose of radioactive waste in another us before you make an application. way. Contents Where you see the term 'document reference number' on the 1 Other applications form: give the document references here and send the 2 About the activities documents with the application form when you've completed 3 Operating techniques it. If you are making a joint submission to us and HSE, specify 4 Disposal of radioactive waste which part (for example, chapter and/or section number) of 5 Monitoring the submission is relevant to each question. 6 Radiological assessment The Environment Agency have published guidance on the 7 Non-radiological assessment disposal of radioactive waste in near surface facilities at 8 Radioactive waste acceptance criteria http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GEHO02 09BPJL-e-e.pdf. Terminology. ‘Directive waste’ means waste as defined in the Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) and includes the classes of inert, non-hazardous and hazardous waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Policies and Policy Instruments in Europe
    IIIEE Reports 2008:2 Waste management policies and policy instruments in Europe An overview Naoko Tojo International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, Sweden Alexander Neubauer and Ingo Bräuer Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Germany Report written as part of project HOLIWAST: Holistic Assessment of Waste Management Technologies © You may use the contents of the IIIEE publications for informational purposes only. You may not copy, lend, hire, transmit or redistribute these materials for commercial purposes or for compensation of any kind without written permission from IIIEE. When using this material you must include the following copyright notice for the authors to the respective parts of the report:: Copyright © Naoko Tojo, IIIEE, Lund University and Alexander Neubauer and Ingo Bräuer. Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Germany . All rights reserved in any copy that you make in a clearly visible position. You may not modify the materials without the permission of the author. Published in 2006 by IIIEE, Lund University, P.O. Box 196, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden, Tel: +46 46 222 02 00, Fax: +46 46 222 02 10, e-mail: [email protected]. ISSN 1650-1675 Research European Commission PRIORITY [policy-oriented research priority SSP/8.1] SPECIFIC TARGETED RESEARCH OR INNOVATION PROJECT HOLIWAST Holistic assessment of waste management technologies. Contract number: 006509 Deliverable n° 1-1 Title: Waste Management Policy and Policy Instruments
    [Show full text]
  • Lo Monstruoso En Los Vídeos Musicales De Floria Sigismondi Y Chris Cunningham En Los Años Noventa (1993-1999)
    Lo monstruoso en los vídeos musicales de Floria Sigismondi y Chris Cunningham en los años noventa (1993-1999) Pau Pascual Galbis UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE VALENCIA FACULTAD DE BELLAS ARTES DEPARTAMENTO DE ESCULTURA LO MONSTRUOSO EN LOS VÍDEOS MUSICALES DE FLORIA SIGISMONDI Y CHRIS CUNNINGHAM EN LOS AÑOS NOVENTA (1993-1999) Tesis Doctoral presentada por: Pau Pascual Galbis Dirigida por: Dr. Miguel Molina Alarcón Valencia, julio del 2011 Esta editorial es miembro de la UNE, lo que garantiza la difusión y comercialización de sus publicaciones a nivel nacional e internacional. © Pau Pascual Galbis, 2011 Primera edición, 2011 © de la presente edición: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València www.editorial.upv.es ISBN: 978-84-695-0692-9 Ref. editorial: 5511 Queda prohibida la reproducción, distribución, comercialización, transformación, y en general, cualquier otra forma de explotación, por cualquier procedimiento, de todo o parte de los contenidos de esta obra sin autorización expresa y por escrito de sus autores. A Hana y Aniol Agradecimientos: A mi familia, Elisa, Pep y David; a la estimable ayuda efectuada por mi Director de la tesis, Miguel Molina Alarcón en los momentos más difíciles; a Pilar Pedraza por esclarecerme el camino y dirigirme el trabajo de investigación, al igual que también menciono el apoyo de mi tutor Vicente Ortiz Sausor en la tesina. Además quisiera agradecer a título personal su contribución en esta disertación: a Patrick Burke, Nigel Balfour, Bernabé Gómez, Pedro Ortuño, Joan Josep Mussarra, Marta Pérez-Yarza, Atsuko Arai, Felip González y Laura Frahm. Por último nombrar también a los que colaboraron en el vídeo, como Joan Urrios, Marta Migula, La Fábrica Naranja y EEDL.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Am Your Faggot Anti-Pope”: an Exploration of Marilyn Manson As a Transgressive Artist
    European journal of American studies 12-2 | 2017 Summer 2017, including Special Issue: Popularizing Politics: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election “I Am Your Faggot Anti-Pope”: An Exploration of Marilyn Manson as a Transgressive Artist Coco d’Hont Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejas/12098 DOI: 10.4000/ejas.12098 ISSN: 1991-9336 Publisher European Association for American Studies Electronic reference Coco d’Hont, « “I Am Your Faggot Anti-Pope”: An Exploration of Marilyn Manson as a Transgressive Artist », European journal of American studies [Online], 12-2 | 2017, document 14, Online since 01 August 2017, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ejas/12098 ; DOI : 10.4000/ ejas.12098 This text was automatically generated on 19 April 2019. Creative Commons License “I Am Your Faggot Anti-Pope”: An Exploration of Marilyn Manson as a Transgres... 1 “I Am Your Faggot Anti-Pope”: An Exploration of Marilyn Manson as a Transgressive Artist Coco d’Hont 1 “As a performer,” Marilyn Manson announced in his autobiography, “I wanted to be the loudest, most persistent alarm clock I could be, because there didn’t seem to be any other way to snap society out of its Christianity- and media-induced coma” (Long Hard Road 80).i With this mission statement, expressed in 1998, the performer summarized a career characterized by harsh-sounding music, disturbing visuals, and increasingly controversial live performances. At first sight, the red thread running through the albums he released during the 1990s is a harsh attack on American ideologies. On his debut album Portrait of an American Family (1994), for example, Manson criticizes ideological constructs such as the nuclear family, arguing that the concept is often used to justify violent pro-life activism.ii Proclaiming that “I got my lunchbox and I’m armed real well” and that “next motherfucker’s gonna get my metal,” he presents himself as a personification of teenage angst determined to destroy his bullies, be they unfriendly classmates or the American government.
    [Show full text]