DOCSLIB.ORG

Waste Management Policies and Policy Instruments in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waste Management Policies and Policy Instruments in Europe IIIEE Reports 2008:2 Waste management policies and policy instruments in Europe An overview Naoko Tojo International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, Sweden Alexander Neubauer and Ingo Bräuer Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Germany Report written as part of project HOLIWAST: Holistic Assessment of Waste Management Technologies © You may use the contents of the IIIEE publications for informational purposes only. You may not copy, lend, hire, transmit or redistribute these materials for commercial purposes or for compensation of any kind without written permission from IIIEE. When using this material you must include the following copyright notice for the authors to the respective parts of the report:: Copyright © Naoko Tojo, IIIEE, Lund University and Alexander Neubauer and Ingo Bräuer. Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Germany . All rights reserved in any copy that you make in a clearly visible position. You may not modify the materials without the permission of the author. Published in 2006 by IIIEE, Lund University, P.O. Box 196, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden, Tel: +46 46 222 02 00, Fax: +46 46 222 02 10, e-mail: [email protected]. ISSN 1650-1675 Research European Commission PRIORITY [policy-oriented research priority SSP/8.1] SPECIFIC TARGETED RESEARCH OR INNOVATION PROJECT HOLIWAST Holistic assessment of waste management technologies. Contract number: 006509 Deliverable n° 1-1 Title: Waste Management Policy and Policy Instruments in Europe an overview Start date of project: 1st August 2005 Duration: 2 years Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE) at Lund University, Sweden Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002- 2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Project home page: http://holiwast.brgm.fr Tojo, Neubauer and Bräuer Preface This report constitutes a part of the Work Package one of the two-year (2005-07) research project entitled Holistic Assessment of Waste Management Technologies (HOLIWAST), funded by the European Commission. The HOLIWAST project is a collaborative effort of partners in seven Member States (Austria, Germany, Denmark, Finland, Italy, Poland and Sweden). Among them, the authors of this report are Naoko Tojo at the International Institute for the International Environmental Economics at Lund University in Sweden (Chapter 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6), and Alexander Neubauer and Ingo Bräuer. Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Germany (Chapter 4). The report was originally submitted to the European Commission as a project report in 2006 and was subsequently modified. The authors would wish to thank the European Commission for providing funding as well as comments to the report. Gratitude is also directed to the partners of the projects for their valuable inputs. The full responsibility for the content of the report remains, however, with the authors. HOLIWAST WP 1: Waste management policies and policy instruments in Europe Executive Summary This report constitutes a part of the Work Package 1 of the two-year research project entitled Holistic Assessment of Waste Management Technologies (HOLIWAST), funded by the European Commission. The HOLIWAST project is a collaborative effort of partners in seven Member States (A, D, DK, F, I, PL and S). Among them, the authors of this report are the partners in Sweden (Chapter 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6) and Germany (Chapter 4). The HOLIWAST project was launched with the following primary objectives: To provide a multidisciplinary (environmental, economic, social) comparison of different waste management technologies. To identify how the most appropriate technologies can be implemented within an integrated waste management framework, for different socio-economic context. To evaluate the opportunity of policy instruments for promoting these technologies and support decision makers in waste management. Work Package 1 of the project has the overall objective of providing insights into the environmental effectiveness of policy instruments related to waste management applied in selected socio-economic contexts. The study presented in this report is the first step to fulfil this task. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of municipal solid waste management policies of the European Union and highlight the potential of selected existing policy instruments in reducing environmental impacts related to municipal waste generated in Europe, focusing on their implication to local governments. In doing so, it aims to facilitate the evaluation of policy instruments implemented and/ or discussed in the three case communities examined in the HOLIWAST project Torino, Italy, Katowice, Poland and Tølløse, Denmark and their effectiveness in decreasing the environmental impacts relating to waste. Among various waste streams, the scope of the HOLIWAST project is limited to municipal waste. Within the municipal waste, the following waste is covered under the project: mixed waste, mixed secondary materials, plastics, metal, glass, paper, composite packaging, biodegradable waste, garden & park waste, manually collected road waste, market waste, textile, batteries, fluorescent tubes, small waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and oil and fat. Reflecting upon the aforementioned scope of the project, the report provides a summary of selected EU legislation, focusing on the parts related to local governments. Concerning the policy instruments, they are divided into administrative, economic and informative instruments. The general characteristics and effectiveness of the selected instruments are concisely described, using concrete examples. The examples are employed to illustrate the content of the instruments as well as what an instrument can manage to achieve in a given context. They are by no means exhaustive lists of all the existing cases. The study is based primarily on the review of existing literature (reports, legislation, books, academic articles, newsletters), complemented by limited number of interviews. Following the introductory chapter, Chapter 2 provides an overview of relevant EU laws and policies on waste. Chapter 3, 4 and 5 describes selected administrative instruments, economic instruments and informative instruments. The report ends with a concise concluding section (Chapter 6). I Tojo, Neubauer and Bräuer Legal and policy framework for waste management in Europe The following EU legislation on waste, their subsequent amendments and (proposal for) revisions are reviewed, together with the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste. Directive 2006/12/EC on waste. Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste. Regulation No 1013/ 2006/ EEC on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community. Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste. Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste. Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. Directive 2006/ 66/ EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC. Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). As of spring 2007, the EU policies on waste are in transition. A new framework directive that replaces the existing framework directive has been proposed. In addition to some of the structural changes, some issues governing all waste policies in the EU such as the distinction between waste and recovered materials, waste for recovery versus waste for disposal are addressed in the proposal. The outcome will have implications to, among others, the movement of waste/ material streams within and across the national boarder and the use of incineration with energy recovery. Some of the EU legislation, especially those governing specific waste streams, contains within them many policy instruments and serves as examples of these policy instruments. Some of them, such as material restriction, set the same standards for all the Member States, while the fulfilment of requirements such as minimum collection/ reuse/ recycling targets is partially left in the hands of Member States. The WEEE Directive and the Directive on batteries and accumulators are based on the concept of EPR (extended producer responsibility). Implementation of the packaging directive in the majority of the old-15 Member States has also been based on EPR. Meanwhile, the implementation in practice often retains the collection responsibility in the hands of municipalities. Local governments seem to want to keep control over the municipal waste collection system for various reasons. The optimal solution may differ depending on the socio-economic context. What will remain in the waste stream handled by the municipalities have implication to the technological solutions they should select. Review of policy instruments In total of 18 policy instruments categorised into administrative, economic and informative are reviewed. The discussions of the respective instruments include the general characteristics of the instrument and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fortum Recycling & Waste
    Fortum Recycling & Waste Public affair priorities 06/2021 Fortum Recycling & Waste Public affair priorities FORTUM RECYCLING & WASTE Public affair priorities As part of Fortum corporation, our Recycling & Waste business area leads the change towards a low-emission energy system and the optimal use of resources. Our goal is to support our customers’ businesses by conserving natural resources and promoting a circular economy. We work together with our customers to build smart and sustainable solutions to ensure the circulation of valuable materials and the removal of harmful substances from the material cycle. Fortum Recycling & Waste employs approximately 650 employees in about 30 offices and treatment centers in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Megatrends like climate change, urbanisation, population growth and limited natural resources are shaping the world. They are pushing us to maximise the efficient use of resources. Reliable waste management and resource efficiency are fundamental in a society based on sustainable practices for a cleaner world. Our aim is to promote the transition towards a more extensive circular economy. For us, a successful circular economy means that materials are recycled as much as possible and hazardous substances are removed from circulation. Our circular economy approach receives, processes and reuses customer waste for material recycling and energy production. Policy objectives should aim to ensure a clean circular economy model and a stronger market for high-quality recycled raw materials. Ultimately, Fortum’s aim is for as much of the waste stream as possible to be recycled, recovered or reused. Waste that is unsuitable for recycling or reuse is incinerated in waste-to-energy plants or in dedicated plants for hazardous waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Penalties for VAT, Excise and Landfill Tax Wrongdoings
    Compliance checks series – CC/FS12 Penalties for VAT, Excise and Landfill Tax wrongdoings This factsheet contains information about the penalties we may charge you for a VAT, Excise or Landfill Tax wrongdoing. This factsheet is one of a series. For the full list of the factsheets in the series, go to www.gov.uk and search for ‘Compliance checks factsheets’. If you need help If you have any health or personal circumstances that may make it difficult for you to deal with this matter, please tell the officer that’s contacted you. We’ll help you in whatever way we can. You can also ask someone else to deal with us on your behalf, for example, a professional adviser, friend or relative. We may however still need to talk or write to you directly about some things. If we need to write to you, we’ll send a copy to the person you’ve asked us to deal with. If we need to talk to you, they can be with you when we do, if you prefer. VAT, Excise or Landfill Tax wrongdoings VAT, Excise and Landfill Tax wrongdoings are when any person: who is not registered for VAT or is not authorised to issue VAT invoices, issues an invoice that includes an amount shown as VAT makes, knowingly causes, or knowingly permits a disposal of material at an unauthorised waste site from 1 April 2018 uses spirits or hydrocarbon oils for a purpose that attracts a higher rate of Excise Duty (this is called ‘misuse’), for example, red diesel (normally used in farm machinery) carries a lower duty than diesel for road vehicles if someone uses red diesel in a road vehicle, this
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Instruments to Improve Waste Management in Greece
    ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS TO IMPROVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN GREECE INCLUDING A PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON A DEPOSIT REFUND SYSTEM FINAL REPORT VOL.1 21 FEBRUARY 2020 ISSUED BY: I.FRANTZIS & ASSOCIATES LTD AND BLACKFOREST SOLUTIONS GMBH BACKGROUND The Greek government asked the GIZ commissioned BlackForest European Commission (EC) for Solutions GmbH (BFS), which support in specific areas (including formed a consortium including the improvement of municipal waste international and national management, regulatory issues of experts from envero GmbH, INFA the waste sector, the management GmbH, Ressource Abfall GmbH, of specific waste categories) in order BlackForest Solutions GmbH and to raise the quality and quantity of I. Frantzis & Associates Ltd. to recycling, to improve data quality provide specific technical expertise and to effectively use economic to GIZ and YPEN from July 2019 instruments. To achieve the to mid-2020 by supporting four aforementioned goals, the Deutsche areas of intervention (AI) linked to Gesellschaft für Internationale the optimization of municipal waste Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GIZ) management in Greece. The areas provides “Technical support for of intervention are: the implementation of the National Waste Management Plan (NWMP) of Greece” from 2018 to 2020. The 1. SEPARATE COLLECTION OF project is funded by the European MUNICIPAL WASTE Union (EU) via the Structural Reform 2. IMPROVEMENT OF COST Support Programme (SRSP) and ACCOUNTING IN MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT the German Federal Ministry for 3. USE OF ECONOMIC Environment, Nature Conservation INSTRUMENTS FOR WASTE and Nuclear Safety (BMU), and MANAGEMENT jointly implemented by GIZ and the 4. SEPARATE COLLECTION OF Hellenic Ministry of Environment BIO-WASTE and Energy (YPEN), in collaboration with the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Resource Recovery Into Current Waste Management Through
    INTEGRATION OF RESOURCE RECOVERY INTO CURRENT WASTE MANAGEMENT THROUGH (ENHANCED) LANDFILL MINING Juan Carlos Hernández Parrodi 1,2,*, Hugo Lucas 3, Marco Gigantino 4, Giovanna Sauve 5, John Laurence Esguerra 6,7, Paul Einhäupl 5,7, Daniel Vollprecht 2, Roland Pomberger 2, Bernd Friedrich 3, Karel Van Acker 5, Joakim Krook 6, Niclas Svensson 6 and Steven Van Passel 7 1 Renewi Belgium SA/NV, NEW-MINE project, 3920 Lommel, Belgium 2 Montanuniversität Leoben, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, 8700 Leoben, Austria 3 RWTH Aachen University, Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling, 52056 Aachen, Germany 4 ETH Zürich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland 5 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Materials Engineering, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 6 Linköping University, Environmental Technology and Management, 58183 Linköping, Sweden 7 Universiteit Antwerpen, Department of Engineering Management, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium Article Info: ABSTRACT Received: Europe has somewhere between 150,000 and 500,000 landfill sites, with an estimat- 1 November 2019 Accepted: ed 90% of them being “non-sanitary” landfills, predating the EU Landfill Directive of 15 November 2019 1999/31/EC. These older landfills tend to be filled with municipal solid waste and Available online: often lack any environmental protection technology. “Doing nothing”, state-of-the- 23 December 2019 art aftercare or remediating them depends largely on technical, societal and eco- Keywords: nomic conditions which vary between countries. Beside “doing nothing” and land- Landfill mining strategies fill aftercare, there are different scenarios in landfill mining, from re-landfilling the Enhanced landfill mining waste into “sanitary landfills” to seizing the opportunity for a combined resource-re- Resource recovery covery and remediation strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Sustainability Legislation on Batteries: Batteries Directive Revision RECHARGE Comments to EU Commission Stakeholder Consultation from April 27 to May 5, 2020
    EU Sustainability Legislation on Batteries: Batteries Directive revision RECHARGE Comments to EU Commission stakeholder consultation from April 27 to May 5, 2020 EU Sustainability Legislation on Batteries: Batteries Directive I 2 EU SUSTAINABILITY LEGISLATION ON BATTERIES In October 2017, the European Commission launched the EU Batteries Alliance to create a competitive and sustainable battery manufacturing activity in the European Union, contributing to both growth and sustainability objectives. In parallel, the Commission has initiated the review of Directive 2006/66/EC (the “Batteries Directive”). Under the EU Sustainability Legislation on Batteries initiative, the Commission intends to complement the existing legislation with key sustainability measures as set out by the European Green Deal, and the respective Industrial Strategy, Circular Economy Action Plan and Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. By the end of 2020, the Commission will publish a proposal for a new battery legislation. The improved regulatory framework for batteries will be pivotal to address the high goal of establishing a sustainable battery industry and deployment in Europe, while ensuring that the European market can remain competitive at global scale. A strong supporter of the European sustainability agenda, RECHARGE participates with strong evidence and industry knowledge in the respective institutional work programs to help establish a regulatory framework that will enable European actors to execute on the technological, environmental and social leadership ambitions of the Strategic Action Plan on Batteries. To this end, we need: • INTERNATIONAL LEVEL PLAYING FIELD: Ensure a level-playing field for the European battery industry by providing legislation supportive of the European Battery Alliance and the Strategic Action Plan for Batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance of Compost and Digestate – Experiences from Germany
    Quality assurance of compost and digestate – Experiences from Germany Quality assurance of compost and digestate Experiences from Germany 1 Quality assurance of compost and digestate – Experiences from Germany Imprint Publisher: German Environment Agency Section III 2.4 Waste Technology, Waste Technology Transfer Section I 1.2 International Sustainability Strategies, Policy and Knowledge Transfer Wörlitzer Platz 1 D-06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Authors: Marie Dollhofer (BiPRO GmbH), Elisabeth Zettl (BiPRO GmbH) In cooperation with: Wolfgang Lausterer (Awiplan-PPD GmbH), Ulrich Hommel (Awiplan-PPD GmbH), Tim Hermann (UBA), Katharina Lenz (UBA) On behalf of the German Environment Agency Design: Atelier Hauer + Dörfler GmbH, Berlin Publications as a pdf: www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen Photo credits: BiPRO GmbH, PLANCO-TEC, Shutterstock, Tim Hermann As at July 2017 ISSN 2363-832X This document is a result of the project “Exchange of expe- riences for establishing a system and an organisation for the quality assurance of compost in Bulgaria”. This project was financed by the German Federal Environment Ministry’s Advisory Assistance Programme (AAP) for environmental protection in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia and other countries neigh- bouring the European Union. It was supervised by the Ger- man Environment Agency. The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Landfill Tax in the UK: Barriers to Increased Effectiveness and Options for the Future
    Landfill Tax in the United Kingdomi Author: Tim Elliott (Eunomia) Brief summary of the case The UK landfill tax was introduced in 1996 in order to better reflect the environmental costs of landfilling. The aim was therefore both to reduce the overall levels of waste produced and to send less waste to landfill. The tax has two bandings: inert waste, currently levied at GBP 2.65 (EUR 2.96) per tonne, and non-inert waste, currently levied at GBP 84.40 (EUR 94.21) per tonne, originally at GBP 7 per tonne.1 When the tax was first introduced, it received wide- spread support from industry, local authorities and NGOs. This was a result of the original intention for the tax to be revenue-neutral by offsetting a reduction in national Insurance Contributions. Furthermore, operators of landfill sites can offset up to 6% of their annual tax by contributing to environmental bodies under the Landfill Communities Fund. Annual revenues have risen from GBP 400 million in 1997/98 to a peak of GBP 1.2 billion in 2013/14, while revenues in 2015/16 were GBP 900 million (EUR 1 billion). The tax has had a significant impact on the quantity of waste sent to landfill: in 2001/02, 50 million tonnes annually were sent to landfill. In 2015/16, the same figure was around 12 million tonnes. A consultation exercise with industry was conducted ahead of the introduction of the tax. A key outcome of this consultation was the banding of the tax into inert and non-inert wastes and the change from an ad valorem structure to a weight-based tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Batteries
    Waste Batteries 16. September 2015 Dr. Michael Oberdörfer Overview 1. Introduction 2. European Battery Directive 2006/66 3. Implementation in German 4. Recovery technologies for waste batteries 2 1. Introduction Main chemical systems Primary batteries (not rechargeable) • Zinc-carbon • Alkaline-manganese • Lithium • Silver oxide; Zinc Air • Mercury-oxide Secondary batteries or accumulators (rechargeable) • Lead-acid • Lithium-Ion, Lithium-polymer • NiMH • NiCd 3 1. World-market Portable rechargeable 16% Primary batteries 37% Industrial rechargeable 17% Automotive batteries 30% 4 2. The Batteries Directive 2006/66/EC Aims: Prohibition on the placing on the market of batteries and accumulators containing hazardous substances. Promotion of a high level of collection and recycling of waste batteries and accumulators. What is new? Applies to all battery types Ban on mercury and cadmium Producer responsibility: collection schemes and recycling Collection targets and recycling efficiency 5 2. The Batteries Directive 2006/66/EC Definitions Portable battery: - is sealed and - can be hand-carried and - is neither an industrial nor an automotive battery. Industrial battery: - designed for exclusively industrial or professional uses or used in any type of electric vehicle. Automotive battery: - used for automotive starter, lighting or ignition power. Producer: - any person in a Member State that places batteries or accumulators, including those incorporated into appliances or vehicles, on the market for the first time within the territory
    [Show full text]
  • Directive 2006/66/EC by QNET LLC Directive 1) Batteries + Goes Into Effect 26 September 2008 2006/66/EC Accumulators
    What manufacturers need to know and do about Battery Directive 2006/66/EC By QNET LLC Directive 1) Batteries + Goes into effect 26 September 2008 2006/66/EC accumulators 2) Waste Batteries + Accumulators Directive objective Minimize negative Prohibits hazardous content: cadmium and mercury impact on environment Harmonize heavy Promotes high level of collection and recycling metal content and Improvement by operators involved in life cycle: labeling throughout - producers the EU. - distributors - end-users - recyclers with specific rules Parties affected Producer Definition of producer: Any person in a member state that irrespective of the selling technique used, including by means of distance selling communication, places batteries or accumulators, including those incorporated into appliances or vehicles, on the market for the first time within the territory of that member state on a professional basis Distributor Definition of distributor: Any person that provides batteries and accumulators on a professional basis to an end-user. Economic Operators Definition of economic operator: Any producer, distributor, collector, recycler, or other treatment © QNET LLC 2007 – All Rights Reserved QNET LLC – PO Box 527- Elk River, MN 55330 Email: [email protected] www.ce-mark.com www.ce-authorizedrepresentative.eu 1 What manufacturers need to know and do about Battery Directive 2006/66/EC A Doing It Once! service By QNET LLC operator. Member States Definition of member states: All EU countries Directive scope All types of batteries and Regardless of shape, volume, weight, material composition or accumulators. Includes: use. Battery or accumulators Exemptions: Battery packs - Equipment connected with the protection of Portable battery Member States essential security interests, arms, Button cell munitions, and war material, with the exclusion of Automotive battery products that are not intended for specifically Industrial battery military purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Waste in Europe — Turning Challenges Into Opportunities
    EEA Report No 04/2020 Bio-waste in Europe — turning challenges into opportunities ISSN 1977-8449 EEA Report No 04/2020 Bio-waste in Europe — turning challenges into opportunities Cover design: EEA Cover photo: © Brendan Killeen Layout: Rosendahls a/s Legal notice The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the European Commission or other institutions of the European Union. Neither the European Environment Agency nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. Brexit notice The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union did not affect the production of this report. Data reported by the United Kingdom are included in all analyses and assessments contained herein, unless otherwise indicated. Copyright notice © European Environment Agency, 2020 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 ISBN 978-92-9480-223-1 ISSN 1977-8449 doi:10.2800/630938 European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 1050 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel.: +45 33 36 71 00 Internet: eea.europa.eu Enquiries: eea.europa.eu/enquiries Contents Contents Authors and acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 4 Key messages .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litter Legislation: a Toolkit for Policymakers
    Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya. Acknowledgments This report was developed by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It was researched, drafted, and produced by Carl Bruch, Kathryn Mengerink, Elana Harrison, Davonne Flanagan, Isabel Carey, Thomas Casey, Meggan Davis, Elizabeth Hessami, Joyce Lombardi, Norka Michel- en, Colin Parts, Lucas Rhodes, Nikita West, and Sofia Yazykova. Within UNEP, Heidi Savelli, Arnold Kreilhuber, and Petter Malvik oversaw the development of the report. The authors express their appreciation to the peer reviewers, including Catherine Ayres, Patricia Beneke, Angela Howe, Ileana Lopez, Lara Ognibene, David Vander Zwaag, and Judith Wehrli. Cover photo: Plastics floating in the ocean The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Environment Programme. © 2016. United Nations Environment Programme. Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Key Policy Framework Instruments
    1 2 3 The key policy framework instruments are: Thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, COM(2005) 666 final -sets as long-term goal for the EU to become a recycling society that seeks to avoid waste and uses waste as a resource: -It set 7 actions how to reach these objectives, for example, step up enforcement, modernise waste legislation, develop recycling standards and improve prevention. -The Strategy played an important role in guiding policy development and has contributed to significant improvement in waste management. The Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (COM(2011) 571) •outlines how to transform Europe's economy into a sustainable one by 2050, how to increase resource productivity and decouple economic growth from resource use and its environmental impact. It illustrates how policies interrelate and build on each other. •It sets various actions (2012-2014) to be taken by the Commission to treat waste as a resource, including the review of the waste targets 7th Environmental Action Programme, 2013 – 2020 - Puts focus to turning waste into a resource including by phasing out landfilling. Action Plan towards Circular economy •Waste management plays a central role in the transition to a circular economy. The plan requires the Commission to take measures: •Revise waste targets (proposal adopted in December 2015); step up enforcement; communication on waste to energy (adopted in January 2017); disseminate good practices on 4 separate collection (specific study available on DG Environment website). 4 5 EU waste legislation objectives are defined in Article of the Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC: • Waste prevention – has been and continues to be the first and most important objective of the EU waste management policy.
    [Show full text]