DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings of the 2Nd Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL -2) Volume 2 Edited by 7-9 October 2016 Dr. Öner Özçelik and Bloomington, Indiana Amber Kennedy Kent ii (C) ConCALL-2 Proceedings copyrighted by Indiana University, CeLCAR (C) All papers copyrighted by the authors 2016 Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL-2) Volume 2/edited by Dr. Öner Özçelik and Amber Kennedy Kent ISBN: 978-0-9961762-1-7 1. Central Asian Languages - Congresses For information on ConCALL-2 (held on 7-9 October 2016, Bloomington, Indiana), visit our website at http://www.iub.edu/~ConCALL/ Published by Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region Eigenmann Hall 702 1900 E. Tenth Street Bloomington, IN 47406-7512 USA http://www.iub.edu/~celcar/ iii History of ConCALL The Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL) was founded in 2014 at Indiana University under the leadership of Dr. Öner Özçelik, the residing director of the Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region (CeLCAR), with grants and contributions from the U.S. Department of Education and several units at Indiana University, including the Ostrom Grant Programs, College of Arts and Humanities Center (CAHI), Inner Asian and Uralic National Resource, College of Arts and Sciences, School of Global and International Studies (SGIS), Sinor Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (SRIFIAS), Department of Central Eurasian Studies (CEUS), and Department of Linguistics. As the nation’s sole U.S. Department of Education funded Language Resource Center focusing on the languages of the Central Asian Region, CeLCAR’s main mission is to strengthen and improve the nation’s capacity for teaching and learning Central Asian languages through teacher training, research, materials development projects, and dissemination. As part of this mission, CeLCAR has an ultimate goal to unify and fortify the Central Asian language community by facilitating networking between linguists and language educators working on Central Asian languages, encouraging research projects that will inform language instruction, and provide opportunities for professionals in the field to both showcase their work and receive feedback from their peers. Thus, ConCALL was established to be the first international academic conference to bring together linguists and language educators working on the languages of the Central Asian region, focusing primarily on Altaic (Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic) and Eastern Indo-European languages, among others, with the aim of encouraging research into how these specific languages are (i) represented formally, (ii) acquired by second/ foreign language learners, and (iii) best taught given research driven teaching methods. ConCALL represents all languages spoken in Central Asia and the surrounding areas, as well as languages that are genetically related to Central Asian languages. Languages represented in ConCALL-2 included, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Dagur, Dari, Farsi, Georgian, Kazakh, Kurdish, Kyrgyz, Mongolian, Pashto, Persian, Tajiki, Tibetan, Turkish, Turkmen, Uyghur, and Uzbek. Conference Proceedings Conference presenters were selected via an anonymous peer-review process. All conference invited speakers and accepted presenters were invited to publish their papers as part of the conference proceedings. iv v CONTENTS OF VOLUME 2 History of ConCALL iii Contents v Editor’s Introduction vii Acknowledgements viii PART 1. PLENARY SPEAKERS I KAHNEMUYIPOUR, Arsalan, University of Toronto Mississauga 3 The Ezafe Construction: Persian and Beyond II MONTRUL, Silvina, University of Illinois 23 The acquisition of “other” “different” “less common” “distant” languages:A critical need III KABAK, Barış, University of Wurzburg, Germany 25 Refining Turkish stress as a multifaceted phenomenon IV ERDAL, Marcel, 27 How did the Turkic languages come to differ as they do? V KARA, György, Indiana University 39 Lessons Learned from the Study of Mongol Languages PART 2. FORMAL LINGUISTICS AND RESEARCH 1 BOKHARI, Hassan and DURMAZ, Mustafa, Indiana University 43 and WASHINGTON, Jonathan, Swathmore College An acoustic analysis of vowel insertion at syllable edges in Turkish 2 CHRISTOPHER, Nadežda, SOAS University of London 55 Kazakh multi-functional particle ğoj: the first description 3 HIDAKA, Shinsuke, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 69 Is the -ar/-mas participle a participle in Uzbek? 4 KAKZHANOVA, Fazira, Karaganda State University 75 Verbal Aspect Problems and the Aspect of the Kazakh Language 5 MACAK, Martin, University of Georgia 85 The (non)realization of Armenian word-final palatal glide 6 YOHEI, Yamada, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 95 A verb aa in Dagur vi PART 3. PEDAGOGY AND TEACHING 1 ANDABAYEVA, Dina and AVAKOVA, Raushangul, al-Farabi Kazakh National University 105 Language Factor In the Formation of National and Cultural Identity of Kazakhstan 2 ARMAN, Rahmna, KENT, Amber Kennedy and ÖZÇELIK, Öner, Indiana University 113 Project-Based Language Learning (PBLL) Instruction in an Online Language Learning Environment: A case study in Pashto 3 CHEN, Yunchuan and JIANG, Li, University of Hawaii at Manoa 119 The nominal expressions in Lhasa Tibetan 4 PUTHUVAL, Sarala, University of Washington 131 A language vitality assessment for Mongolian in China 5 SULEYMANOVA, Gulnara, Michigan State University 149 The acquisition of Azerbaijani idioms by second language learners vii Editor’s Introduction On October 7th, 8th, and 9th, 2016, the Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region (CeLCAR) hosted the Second Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL-2) at Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana as the second occurrence of this biannual academic conference. ConCALL was established in May 2014 to bring together linguists and language educators specializing in the languages of the Central Asian region, including Turkic, Iranian, Mongolic, Tungusic and Tibetan languages spoken in the region, among others. The theme of this conference, “Continuing the Journey: Strengthening the Central Asian Language Community,” was selected to build upon the theme of the inaugural conference which was “Building a bond: Strengthening the Central Asian Language Community” and is consistent with our goals to create a stronger network of Central Asian language experts and to provide a unique opportunity for researchers, pedagogists, linguists, and educators in the field to present their work to an audience of their peers in the same language field. Once again, we were pleased at the overall success of the conference. We had 68 registered attendees that came from all over the globe, including not only the Central Eurasian region, including Afghanistan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan, but also attendees from Canada, China, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom! Additionally, we had attendees from various American universities and institutions including Indiana University, Michigan State University, San Diego State University, University of California, Santa Cruz, University of Georgia, University of Hawaii, University of Oregon, and the University of Washington. And of course our illustrious guest speakers Marcel Erdal, Baris Kabak, Arsalan Kahnemuyipour, György Kara, and Silvina Montrul represented Goethe University, University of Würzburg, University of Toronto, Indiana University, and University of Illinois, respectively. We were impressed and inspired by the high level of quality abstract submissions, and out of the 65 abstracts submitted, 19 were selected for oral presentations (an acceptance rate of 29.23%) and 7 were selected for poster presentations (an acceptance rate of 10.76%), with an overall acceptance rate of 40% total for both oral and poster presentations. The selected presentations and posters covered an assortment of research topics, including syntax, semantics, phonetics, phonology, language acquisition, and pedagogy, related to an assortment of language families, including Turkic, Iranian, Mongolic, Tibetan, and even Kartvelian. We cannot express enough our gratitude to all of those who continue to support this unique conference, which we genuinely believe is making a difference to strengthen and unite our greater CentralAsian language learning community, as well as increase both the quantity and quality of teaching these less commonly taught languages across the world. And finally, we would like to once again thank the conference’s founding organization, Indiana University’s Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region (CeLCAR), as well as our other 2016 conference sponsors: IU’s Inner Asian & Uralic National Resource Center (IAUNRC) and Center for the Study of the Middle East (CSME). Additionally, special thanks to the IU’s School of Global and International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, Central Eurasian Studies Department, and Department of Linguistics for their continued support and contributions. We look forward to seeing everyone again in Spring 2018, and hopefully some new faces as well. Sincerely, Dr. Öner Özçelik, Director Amber Kennedy Kent, Language Instructional Specialist Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana October 2016 viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Second Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics held at Indiana University on 7-9 October 2016 was made possible through the generosity of our sponsors as well as the help from the CeLCAR staff and several IU faculty and student volunteers whose diligence
Recommended publications
  • A Minimalist Analysis of Uyghur Genitives Stephen Politzer-Ahles

    A Minimalist Analysis of Uyghur Genitives Stephen Politzer-Ahles

    A Minimalist analysis of Uyghur genitives Stephen Politzer-Ahles University of Kansas Abstract This paper investigates the syntactic structure of so-called genitive-possessive DPs in Uyghur, a Turkic language. Uyghur genitive-possessives bear suffixes on both the “possessing” entity (comparable to the Saxon genitive 's in English) and the “possessed” one. The suffix on the “possessor”, -ning, is considered a genitive case marker; the suffix on the “possessed” has multiple allomorphs and is considered an agreement marker that agrees in person and number with the “possessor”. Based on the multiplicity of semantic roles that the “possessing” object may bear, and the observation that it may be dropped from the DP, an analogy is made between genitive-possessive DPs and finite TPs. It is proposed that “possessors” behave in a manner parallel to that of subjects of TPs: they are introduced by a quasi-functional head n or within a gerund, and raise to [Spec,DP] to receive genitive case from D. The agreement suffix, on the other hand, is treated as the phonological realization of an Agr head that is introduced with unvalued phi-features, features which are valued when the “possessing” entity passes through the specifier of AgrP. Adopting this structure can explain data on the realization of definiteness in genitive and non-genitive DPs, and the distribution of adverbials within gerunds. Introduction One of the key components to a theory of noun phrase structure is an explanation of how possessive marking is carried out within the DP. For example, a theory of English DPs owes an explanation of where the 's comes from in phrases like “John’s book”, and how case-checking is done in such a phrase.
  • Turkmen Language: Alphabet, Structure and Writing

    Turkmen Language: Alphabet, Structure and Writing

    International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation ISSN: 2582-7138 Received: 03-07-2021; Accepted: 19-07-2021 www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com Volume 2; Issue 4; July-August 2021; Page No. 663-664 Turkmen Language: Alphabet, structure and writing Homayoun Mahmoodi Lecture, Department of Turkmani, Education Faculty, Jawzjan University, Sheberghan, Afghanistan Corresponding Author: Homayoun Mahmoodi Abstract The Turkmen Language is classified as one of the Turkic people worldwide, with approximately 1 million more languages which are all in the Ural-Altaic language family. speaking it as a second language. The majority of Turkmen Like all Turkic languages, the Turkmen Language is an speakers are located in Eurasia and Central Asia, with the agglutinative language that has productive inflectional and highest concentrations located in Turkmenistan, Iran, and derivational suffixes which are affixed to a word like “beads Afghanistan. on a string”. Turkmen is spoken natively by about 7 million Keywords: Turkmen, Afghanistan, Alphabet, structure 1. Introduction Turkmen are part of the ethno-linguistic Turkic continuum that stretches from western China to western Turkey. They share a claim to western-Turkic (Oguz) heritage along with Azerbaijanis and Turks in Turkey (Golden 1972) [4]. Despite a distinct twenty-first century identity, Turkmen culture and traditions historically overlapped with that of other Turks. The term “Turkic” refers to this cultural and linguistic heritage that all Turkic-language speaking groups share. Nevertheless, a separate Turkmen sense of identity was born out of their particular historical experience. A nomadic heritage, distinctively Oguz dialects, and tribal traditions contribute greatly to the identity that sets Turkmen apart from other Turkic groups and shape a specifically Turkmen sense of ethnic identity.
  • Türkmen Halilarindan Öğrendiklerimiz

    Türkmen Halilarindan Öğrendiklerimiz

    ÇÜTAD Çukurova Üniversitesi Cilt 3, Sayı 2 Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi Aralık 2018 ISSN: 2587-1900 Geliş Tarihi: 02.10.2018 E-ISSN: 2548-0979 Kabul Tarihi: 10.12.2018 TÜRKMEN HALILARINDAN ÖĞRENDİKLERİMİZ 1 Youssef AZEMOUN (Yusuf AZMUN) ÖZET Batı’da Türkmen halısına karşı gittikçe artan ilgiye rağmen bu halının ancak sanatsal ve teknik özellikleri araştırma konusu olmuştur. Bu makale Türkmen halısının bazı özelliklerini dilbilimsel açıdan ele alıyor.Yazıda uzun zamandır tartışma konusu olan halı sözcüğünün nasıl türediği açıklanıyor. Halı terminolojisinde ‘dokumya başlamak’ anlamındaki yügürt- fiili incelenirken Türkmen ağızlarında Türkmen çadırının, toplandıktan sonra yerde bıraktığı daire biçimli izi için yaygın olarak kullanılan yügürt > yüwürt sözcüğünün yardımıyla yurt sözcüğünün nasıl türediği ortaya çıkarılıyor. Aynı şekilde Eski Tükçede ‘kocanın kardeşi’ anlamına gelen yurç sözcüğünün etimolojisi de açıklığa kavuşturuluyor. Nikah kıymak (Azerbaycan Türkçesinde kesmek) birleşik fiili konusunda kimse pek kafa yormamış ve bu söz olduğu gibi kabul edilmiştir. Arapça nikah sözcüğünün Eski Türkçedeki karşılığı ‘düğüm’ anlamındaki tügün’dür. Bu yazıda nikah/ tügün kıymak deyiminin halyla ilgili olduğu açıklanıyor. İngilizcede evlenmek için to tie the not/ düğüm atmak deyimi kullanılırken bu deyimin Türkçe karşılığı tügünü kıymak/ düğümü kesmek’tir. Bunun halı ile ilgili olduğunu bir Türkmen evlilik ritüelinden öğreniyoruz: imam nikah kıyarken Türkmen kadın da bir düğümü keser gibi elindeki makası sürekli açıp kapar. Öte yandan Türkmen halısının en önemli desenine göl denir; her Türkmen boyunun kendisine özgü göl‘ü vardır. Bu desen Şamanizm’in yir sub kültü ile ilgilidir. Yir kavramı da Şamanizm’de kutsal sayılan dağ ile ifade edilir. Dağda yaşayan hayvanlar, meselâ dağ koçu konurbaş da kutsaldır. Türkmen halk müziğinde konurbaş mukamı vardır.
  • Studies in Honour of Éva Kincses-Nagy

    Studies in Honour of Éva Kincses-Nagy

    ALTAIC AND CHAGATAY LECTURES Studies in Honour of Éva Kincses-Nagy Altaic and Chagatay Lectures Studies in Honour of Éva Kincses-Nagy Edited by István Zimonyi Szeged – 2021 This publication was supported by the ELTE-SZTE Silk Road Research Group, ELKH Cover illustration: Everyone acts according to his own disposition (Q 17,84, written in nasta’liq) Calligraphy of Mustafa Khudair Letters and Words. Exhibtion of Arabic Calligraphy. Cairo 2011, 35. © University of Szeged, Department of Altaic Studies, Printed in 2021 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by other means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of the author or the publisher. Printed by: Innovariant Ltd., H-6750 Algyő, Ipartelep 4. ISBN: 978 963 306 793 2 (printed) ISBN: 978 963 306 794 9 (pdf) Contents Preface ................................................................................................................. 11 ŞÜKRÜ HALÛK AKALIN On the Etymology and Word Formation of Arıbeyi ‘Queen Bee’: How did the Female Bee Become Bey ‘Male Ruler’ in Turkish? ....................... 15 KUTSE ALTIN The Reconstruction of the Motives and Activities of the Last Campaign of Kanuni Sultan Süleyman ........................................................ 21 TATIANA A. ANIKEEVA The Tale of the Epic Cycle of “Kitab-i Dedem Korkut” in Turkish Folklore of the 20th Century ................................................................... 43 İBRAHIM AHMET AYDEMIR Zur Typologie von „Small Clauses” in modernen Türksprachen ........................ 51 LÁSZLÓ BALOGH Notes on the Ethnic and Political Conditions of the Carpathian Basin in the Early 9th Century ........................................................... 61 JÚLIA BARTHA Turkish Heritage of Hungarian Dietary Culture .................................................. 71 BÜLENT BAYRAM An Epic about Attila in Chuvash Literature: Attilpa Krimkilte .........................
  • Usage and Chinese Translation of Uyghur Auxiliary Verb “Çiq-”*

    Usage and Chinese Translation of Uyghur Auxiliary Verb “Çiq-”*

    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 378 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019) Usage and Chinese Translation of Uyghur Auxiliary Verb “Çiq-”* Rehmitulla Tudaji School of Uyghur Language and Culture Northwest Minzu University Lanzhou, China 730030 Guzalnur Tursun Osman Juma** School of Uyghur Language and Culture School of Uyghur Language and Culture Northwest Minzu University Northwest Minzu University Lanzhou, China 730030 Lanzhou, China 730030 **Corresponding Author Abstract—Uyghur "çiq" is a kind of auxiliary verb, which attaches to the coverb and loses its lexical meaning completely or II. RELEVANT RESEARCHES ON UYGUR AUXILIARY VERBS partly, expressing the aspect or modal meaning. Uyghur Uyghur auxiliary verbs have rich functions. Although they auxiliaries are a kind of auxiliary verbs, which completely or are only a kind of auxiliary verbs, when they are combined partially lose their lexical meaning and attach to the coverb to with co-verbs, they are the carriers of the whole morpheme express the aspect or modal meaning. They are only a kind of change. Therefore, the understanding of Uyghur auxiliary auxiliary verbs; but when they are combined with coverbs, they verbs is relatively unified. The main research results are as are the carriers of the whole morpheme change. In Uyghur, auxiliary verbs play an important role in enriching language, as follows: it can make the expression of thoughts and feelings more delicate and improve communication efficiency. In addition, it can make A. Study on the Meaning of Uyghur Auxiliary Verbs the language succinct and lively and enable the thoughts and Experts and scholars have a relatively unified feelings to be expressed accurately and appropriately.
  • The Phonosemantic Research of Azerbaijani and Turkish in the Aspect of Literary Language and Dialect

    The Phonosemantic Research of Azerbaijani and Turkish in the Aspect of Literary Language and Dialect

    International Academy Journal Web of Scholar ISSN 2518-167X THE PHONOSEMANTIC RESEARCH OF AZERBAIJANI AND TURKISH IN THE ASPECT OF LITERARY LANGUAGE AND DIALECT PhD. Teymurlu Z. M. Department of the Azerbaijani Language and Literature Baku Engineering University, Azerbaijan, Baku DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_wos/28022020/6915 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 14 December 2019 Discovering and categorizing phonetic, morphological and lexical units Accepted: 19 February 2020 related to different languages in any language, studying the factors and Published: 28 February 2020 forms of language connections are still among trending issues nowadays. Special importance has been attached on dialect lexicon of languages, KEYWORDS historical-comparative study of literary language and finding out various language elements in the paper. Some researchers support that as Turkic the Azerbaijani language, peoples have been formed as independent or semi-independent nations the Turkish language, completing ethnosocial differentiation process since the late Middle literary language, Ages, their languages differ from one another to some extent. The dialect, emergence of different Turkic states has led to the appearance of phonosemantics common and various features in the peoples and their languages who experienced public-political differentiation. In this case if the existing analogical features are proof for the closeness of these languages, distinct features are indeed the confirmation of peculiar development direction of each language. The research work provides some vision about common and distinctive features of the Azerbaijani language dialects and the Turkish language. The characteristics of languages’ mutual influence are reflected in language material. Citation: Teymurlu Z. M. (2020) The Phonosemantic Research of Azerbaijani and Turkish in the Aspect of Literary Language and Dialect.
  • Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV

    Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV

    BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 Sponsored by VELIYEV RUSTAM SALEH oglu T ranslated by ZAHID MAHAMMAD oglu AHMADOV Edited by FARHAD MAHAMMAD oglu MUSTAFAYEV Budagov B.A. Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia. - Baku “Elm”, 1997, -1 7 4 p. ISBN 5-8066-0757-7 The geographical toponyms preserved in the immense territories of Turkic nations are considered in this work. The author speaks about the parallels, twins of Azerbaijani toponyms distributed in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Altay, the Ural, Western Si­ beria, Armenia, Iran, Turkey, the Crimea, Chinese Turkistan, etc. Be­ sides, the geographical names concerned to other Turkic language nations are elucidated in this book. 4602000000-533 В ------------------------- 655(07)-97 © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 A NOTED SCIENTIST Budag Abdulali oglu Budagov was bom in 1928 at the village o f Chobankere, Zangibasar district (now Masis), Armenia. He graduated from the Yerevan Pedagogical School in 1947, the Azerbaijan State Pedagogical Institute (Baku) in 1951. In 1955 he was awarded his candidate and in 1967 doctor’s degree. In 1976 he was elected the corresponding-member and in 1989 full-member o f the Azerbaijan Academy o f Sciences. Budag Abdulali oglu is the author o f more than 500 scientific articles and 30 books. Researches on a number o f problems o f the geographical science such as geomorphology, toponymies, history o f geography, school geography, conservation o f nature, ecology have been carried out by academician B.A.Budagov. He makes a valuable contribution for popularization o f science.
  • Oov in the Turkic Languages

    Oov in the Turkic Languages

    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 6 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy November 2015 Comparative-Historical Analysis of the Infinitive Form in –Oov in the Turkic Languages Aynel E. Meshadiyeva (PhD, Ass. Prof.) Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, The Institute of Linguistics named after Nasimi, Baku, Azerbaijan [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p203 Abstract This paper is devoted to a comparative-historical analysis of the infinitive form ending in -oov in Modern Tur kic languages as well as in their dialects and sub-dialects. Currently a number of issues regarding the morphological - semantic and functional features of infinitive forms in the Turkic languages have not received exhaust tive coverage. The experiences of study of the infinitive form ending in -oov in Turkology is analyzed, approaches to definition of its structural-semantic, syntactic features and etymology are discussed. Similar and distinctive features have been detected, as well as phonetic variants of the infinitive form ending in -oov in Modern Turkic languages. Etymological aspects of the construction are also considered in this paper. It should be noted that a systematic comparative-historical study of the grammatical elements of the modern Turkic languages takes on special significance in Turkological linguistics. In the author’s opinion, the relevance of the chosen topic is determined by these factors. Keywords: infinitive form ending in –oov, comparative-historical aspect, etymology, modern Turkic languages and dialects, similar and distinctive features 1. Introduction A comparative-historical study of individual structural elements and grammar of the Turkic languages, in particular, infinitives, have important scientific value.
  • On Uyghur Relative Clauses

    On Uyghur Relative Clauses

    On Uyghur relative clauses Éva Á. Csató & Muzappar Abdurusul Uchturpani Csató, Éva Á. & Uchturpani, Muzappar Abdurusul 2010. On Uyghur relative clauses. Turkic Languages 14, 69-93. Two types of relative clauses are used in modern Uyghur: one in which the subject is in the Nominative and the other in which the subject is in the Genitive and the head noun bears possessive agreement. The article gives a concise account of the main characteris- tics of these and some functionally related constructions. The aim is to pave the way for more research on the issues involved. Éva Á. Csató & Muzappar Abdurusul Uchturpani, Department of Linguistics and Philol- ogy, Uppsala University, Box 635, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected] Turkic relative constructions Turkic relative clauses are typically non-finite clauses based on a participle. The dominating type of relative clause is not marked for subject-predicate agreement (Csató 1996 and references given there). See Ex. 1. Ex. 1 Karachay-Balkar Non-marked relative clause konaχ kel-üčü üy guest come-PART room ‘a room where guests stay’ > ‘guestroom’ Some Turkic languages have developed relative constructions in which subject- predicate agreement is marked by a possessive suffix on the participle. In such con- structions the Genitive can be assigned to the subject. See the following examples. Ex. 2 Turkish Genitive relative clause with subject-predicate agreement kız-ıni uyu-duğ-ui oda girl-GEN sleep-DIK.PART room ‘a /the room where the girl sleeps’ Certain languages, for instance Turkmen, have a type of relative construction in which agreement between the Genitive subject of the relative clause and the head noun is marked; see Ex.
  • Mutual Intelligibility Among the Turkic Languages

    Mutual Intelligibility Among the Turkic Languages

    Mutual Intelligibility Among the Turkic Languages By Robert Lindsay Abstract: The Turkic family of languages with all important related dialects was analyzed on the basis of mutual intelligibility: (1) To determine the extent to which various Turkic lects can understand each other. (2) To ascertain whether various Turkic lects are better characterized as full languages in the own in need of ISO codes from SIL or rather as dialects of another language. (3) To analyze the history of various Turkic lects in an attempt to write a proper history of the important lects. (4) To attempt to categorize the Turkic languages in terms of subfamilies, sub-sub families, etc. The results were: (1) Rough intelligibility figures for various Turkic lects, related lects and Turkish itself were determined. Surprisingly, it was not difficult to arrive at these rough estimates. (2) The Turkic family was expanded from Ethnologue's 41 languages to 53 languages. Splitting: a number of new languages were created from existing dialects, as these dialects were better characterized as full languages than as dialects of another tongue. Lumping: a few existing languages were eliminated and re-analyzed as dialects of another or newly created language. (3) Full and detailed histories for many Turkic lects were written up in a coherent, easy to understand way, a task sorely needed in Turkic as histories of Turkic lects are often confused, inaccurate, controversial, and incomplete. (4) A new attempt was made at categorizing the Turkic family that rejects and rewrites some of the better-known characterizations. Acknowledgments: This paper could not be written without the generous support and kind, wise heart of Professor Suer Eker of Bashkent University in Ankara, who is in charge of the book project where this article is published.
  • |||GET||| Uyghur an Intermediate Textbook 1St Edition

    |||GET||| Uyghur an Intermediate Textbook 1St Edition

    UYGHUR AN INTERMEDIATE TEXTBOOK 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Gulnisa Nazarova | 9781626163645 | | | | | Uyghur: An Intermediate Textbook One element that did bother me however were the cultural-note boxes, several of which came off as having a pro-Uyghur flavor that I found too political for a language book. Thanks for telling us about the problem. I do not, and so unfortunately cannot say more. The follow-up to the beginners' textbook just below, with all of the same pros and cons. While not Uyghur An Intermediate Textbook 1st edition unless you are already somewhat familiar with the language, this may not be bad as a refresher, although some of the forms given are outdated and no single point is truly explored in great detail. Have not looked through this one yet, but it looks like a neat little document. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Lists with This Book. A friend of mine who used this book in his middle school classes recommended it to me, and it looks fairly good and comprehensive. If you're just a learner of the language, I would recommend skipping on this one unless you're at an intermediate or advanced level and would like another refresher on auxiliary verbs, in which case Section 2 may be of benefit. A dictionary of dialect terms. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Unfortunately, I've yet to read it and so cannot say any more. Add to Wishlist. A very Uyghur An Intermediate Textbook 1st edition annotated dictionary of Uyghur proverbs and sayings.
  • Loanwords in Uyghur in a Historical and Socio-Cultural Perspective (1), DOI: 10.46400/Uygur.712733 , Sayı: 2020/15, S

    Loanwords in Uyghur in a Historical and Socio-Cultural Perspective (1), DOI: 10.46400/Uygur.712733 , Sayı: 2020/15, S

    Uluslararası Uygur Araştırmaları Dergisi Sulaiman, Eset (2020). Loanwords in Uyghur in a Historical and Socio-Cultural Perspective (1), DOI: 10.46400/uygur.712733 , Sayı: 2020/15, s. 31-69. LOANWORDS IN UYGHUR IN A HISTORICAL AND SOCIO-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE (1) [Araştırma Makalesi-Research Article] Eset SULAIMAN* Geliş Tarihi: 01.04.2020 Kabul Tarihi: 13.06.2020 Abstract Modern Uyghur is one of the Eastern Turkic languages which serves as the regional lingua franca and spoken by the Uyghur people living in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of China, whose first language is not Mandarin Chinese. The number of native Uyghur speakers is currently estimated to be more than 12 million all over the world (Uyghur language is spoken by more than 11 million people in East Turkistan, the Uyghur homeland. It is also spoken by more than 300,000 people in Kazakhstan, and there are Uyghur-speaking communities in Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, India, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Mongolia, Australia, Germany, the United States of America, Canada and other countries). The Old Uyghur language has a great number of loanwords adopted from different languages at different historical periods. The loanwords come from sources such as ancient Chinese, the ancient Eastern Iranian languages of Saka, Tocharian and Soghdian of the Tarim Basin. Medieval Uyghur, which developed from Old Uyghur and Karakhanid Turkic, is in contrast to Old Uyghur, is a language containing a substantial amount of Arabic and Persian lexical elements. Modern Uyghur was developed on the basis of Chaghatay Turki, which had also been heavily influenced by Arabic and Persian vocabularies.