DOCSLIB.ORG

Treaty Doc. 111–5)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treaty Doc. 111–5) S. HRG. 111–738 THE NEW START TREATY (TREATY DOC. 111–5) HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 29, MAY 18, 19, 25, JUNE 10, 15, 16, 24, AND JULY 15, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 S:\HEARING FILES\START\62467.TXT MIKEB THE NEW START TREATY (TREATY DOC. 111–5) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 S:\HEARING FILES\START\62467.TXT MIKEB S. HRG. 111–738 THE NEW START TREATY (TREATY DOC. 111–5) HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 29, MAY 18, 19, 25, JUNE 10, 15, 16, 24, AND JULY 15, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 62–467 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\HEARING FILES\START\62467.TXT MIKEB COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin BOB CORKER, Tennessee BARBARA BOXER, California JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JIM DEMINT, South Carolina ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming JIM WEBB, Virginia ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, New York DAVID MCKean, Staff Director KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Republican Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\HEARING FILES\START\62467.TXT MIKEB CONTENTS Thursday, April 29, 2010 THE HISTORICAL AND MODERN CONTEXT FOR U.S.-RUSSIAN ARMS CONTROL Page Kerry, Hon. John F., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, opening statement ..... 1 Lugar, Hon. Richard G., U.S. Senator from Indiana, opening statement ........... 3 Schlesinger, Hon. James R., PH.D., former Secretary of Defense, former Sec- retary of Energy, former Director of Central Intelligence, Chairman of the Board, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA .................................................... 5 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 7 Perry, Hon. William J., Former Secretary of Defense, Michael and Barbara Berberian Professor, Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA ..................................................................... 9 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 10 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD Responses of Dr. James Schlesinger to Questions Submitted by Senator Kerry ..................................................................................................................... 30 Responses of Dr. James Schlesinger to Questions Submitted by Senator Risch 31 Tuesday, May 18, 2010 THE NEW START TREATY Page Kerry, Hon. John F., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, opening statement ..... 33 Lugar, Hon. Richard G., U.S. Senator from Indiana, opening statement ........... 35 Clinton, Hon. Hillary, Secretary of State, Department of State, Washington DC .......................................................................................................................... 37 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 41 Gates, Hon. Robert, Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, Wash- ington, DC ............................................................................................................. 43 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 46 Mullen, Admiral Michael, USN, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Washington, DC .......................................................................................................................... 48 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 49 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD Responses of Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen, and Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator Lugar ............................................................. 77 Response of Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen, and Secretary Clinton to Ques- tion Submitted by Senator Wicker ..................................................................... 84 Responses of Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen to Questions Submitted by Senator Lugar ................................................................................................. 84 Responses of Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen to Questions Submitted by Senator Barrasso ............................................................................................. 88 Responses of Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen to Questions Submitted by Senator Wicker ................................................................................................ 90 (III) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\HEARING FILES\START\62467.TXT MIKEB IV Page Responses of Secretary Gates and Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator Barrasso ............................................................................................. 96 Responses of Secretary Gates and Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator Wicker ................................................................................................ 99 Responses of Secretary Gates to Questions Submitted by Senator Lugar .......... 99 Responses of Secretary Gates to Questions Submitted by Senator DeMint ....... 105 Responses of Secretary Gates to Questions Submitted by Senator Barrasso ..... 106 Responses of Secretary Gates to Questions Submitted by Senator Wicker ........ 108 Responses of Secretary Gates to Questions Submitted by Senator Inhofe ......... 110 Responses of Admiral Mullen to Questions Submitted by Senator DeMint ....... 112 Responses of Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator Lugar ....... 113 Responses of Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator DeMint .... 121 Responses of Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator Wicker ..... 123 Responses of Secretary Clinton to Questions Submitted by Senator Inhofe ...... 128 Wednesday, May 19, 2010 THE HISTORY AND LESSONS OF START Page Kerry, Hon. John F., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, opening statement ..... 135 Lugar, Hon. Richard G., U.S. Senator from Indiana, opening statement ........... 137 Baker, James A., III, Former Secretary of State, Former Secretary of the Treasury, senior partner, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX ............................... 138 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 142 Wednesday, May 19, 2010 THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC ARMS CONTROL IN A POST-COLD-WAR WORLD Page Kerry, Hon. John F., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, opening statement ..... 163 Lugar, Hon. Richard G., U.S. Senator from Indiana, opening statement ........... 165 Kissinger, Hon. Henry, Former Secretary of State, Kissinger Associates, New York, NY ............................................................................................................... 167 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 169 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD Prepared Statement of Hon. Russell D. Feingold, U.S. Senator from Wis- consin .................................................................................................................... 187 Responses of Dr. Henry Kissinger to Questions Submitted by Senator Fein- gold ........................................................................................................................ 187 Thursday, June 10, 2010 STRATEGIC ARMS CONTROL AND NATIONAL SECURITY Page Kerry, Hon. John F., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, opening statement ..... 189 Lugar, Hon. Richard G., U.S. Senator from Indiana, opening statement ........... 191 Scowcroft, LTG Brent, USAF (Ret.), President, The Scowcroft Group, Wash- ington, DC ............................................................................................................. 192 Hadley, Hon. Stephen J., Senior Adviser for International Affairs, United States Institute of Peace, Washington, DC ........................................................ 194 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 196 Tuesday, June 15, 2010 THE NEGOTIATIONS Page Kerry, Hon. John F., U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, opening statement ..... 213 Lugar, Hon. Richard G., U.S. Senator from Indiana, opening statement ........... 215 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Dec 06, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 5904
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Senator Bob Dole President Reagan Departs for The
    This press release is from the collections at the Robert J. Dole Archive and Special Collections, University of Kansas. ews from SenatorPlease contact us with any questions or comments: http://dolearchive.ku.edu/ask OBDOLE (R- Kansas) SH 141 Hart Building, Washington, D.C. 20510-1601 POR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: WALT RIKER, DALE TATE MAY 25, 19 8 8 (202) 224-3135 STATEMENT OF SENATOR BOB DOLE THE PRESIDENT DEPARTS FOR .THE SUMMIT THIS MO R NING, PRESIDENT REAGAN DEPARTS WASHINGTON, EN ROUTE TO HIS FOURTH SUMMIT MEETING WITH SOV IET GENERAL SECRETARY GORBACHEV, SCHEDULED TO BEGIN MAY 29 IN MOSCOW. AS DO ALL SUMMITS, THIS ONE OFFERS THE PROMISE OF PROGRESS ON IMPORTANT BILATERAL AND INTERNATIONAL ISSUES; AND THE PERIL OF NF LATED EXPECTATIONS. AS WITH ALL SUMMITS, THE BEST ATT ITUDE FOR APPROACHING THIS ONE IS TO KEEP OUR EYES AS WIDE OPEN AS OUR MINDS; AND TO KEEP O UR FEET FIRMLY ON THE GROUND. ' WE CAN ACHIEVE MUCH IN MOSCOW; WE CANNOT ACHIEVE VERYTHING. AND WE CAN ONLY BE DISAPPOINTED IF OUR GOALS EXCEED OUR REACH. WE CAN ACHIEVE IMPORTANT RESULTS ON ARMS CONTROL. IF WE IN THE SENATE DO OUR PART, WE CAN PUT INTO EFFECT A GROUND-BREAK ING UCLEAR ARMS REDUCTION AGREEMENT, THE INTERMEDIATE RANGE NUCLEAR FORCES TREATY; THE FIRST EVER TO REDUCE EXISTING NUCLEAR STOCKP ILES, AND ELIMINATE WHOLE CLASSES OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS. WE CAN MOVE CLOSER TO AN UNDERSTANDING ON VERIF ICAT ION REGIMES WHICH COULD YIELD THE REALISTIC PROSP ECT OF SENATE ACTION ON AT LEAST ONE OF THE TWO NUCLEAR TEST ING TREATIES BEFORE US.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist for the Moscow Summit,Briefing
    65 1 May 20,1988 CHECKLIST FOR THE MOSCOW SUMMIT,BRIEFING From May 29 to June 2,1988, Ronald Reagan will be in Moscow for his fourth meeting with Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. The first meeting, in Geneva in 1985, restored United States-Soviet summit dialogue after a six-year hiatus caused by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the terminal illness of three Soviet leaders. Reagan and Gorbachev met again in Reykjavik in 1986. That meeting broke down over Soviet insistence that the U.S. abandon its Strategic Defense Initiative. The third summit; .atwhichathe Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was signed, was held in Washington last December. With this fourth Reagan-Gorbachev summit, Reagan will have met the Soviet leader more times than any American President has met any other Soviet leader. In an important sense, therefore, this summit is almost routine. Dramatic agreements should not be expected, nor are they desirable. In keeping with this the Moscow summit should be deliberately low-key. Reagan should downplay arms control issues, except to insist on full Soviet compliance with the INF Treaty and to insist that any strategic arms agreement must include provisions for strategic defense deployment. Items of U.S. Concern. Reagan should emphasize agenda items reflecting U.S. concern over Soviet expansionism abroad and human rights abuses at home. He forcefully should express U.S. opposition to Soviet support for wars that anti-democratic and anti-Western regimes wage against their own peoples. He should tell Gorbachev that the U.S. expects Moscow to end all involvement in Afghanistan; stop its military aid to Nicaragua and pull Soviet-bloc advisors out of that country; support internationally supervised elections in Mozambique and Angola, along with a withdrawal of Soviet and Cuban troops from the latter country; refrain from encouraging the Philippine communist rebels; and end genocide being committed in Ethiopia by the Soviet client regime of the dictator Mengistu Haile Maria.
    [Show full text]
  • Moscow Summit Transcripts
    first o.e on one M€etinq se.retary Gorbachev €l- sovier Nsc staff ^ffairs, .*,.r c----+-., A.ting DcFartient section chief, Mfl May 29, 1933, l:26 p.n. - 4:r7 p.m. st. catherine H.LI, The xrenrin, dosco' right away tnat he vas wery deremrined to contiNe t\e qro'inq dialoque whi.h gatrin!.; momentM in soviet-Aneri.an relarlors, ., -y u., o b, 'as that he th.usht that jn recent !.ars, since the statenent they had sisned in Genera, theie not onl? in bilaterai relations, but, ..lo .os po . chanqe was io nake rhe jhternational and 'hole clinate betrer dore it alone, t[e sovi.t leadership could not ha'c donc it a1.r€. The tqo si<res had ro do it roqertrer, .nd hdd. There was o' FE o" . - Luti.n had counLed For a ]ot. Gorbachew €nphasized rh.L he qrs not iust saying ricc {ords- lqr 1rie Preald.nt said th.t botn sides had con. a long lay since lrc -l;at;;tmo eorbachew in 1es5. History {ontil re.oi.r rhe plraod positiv.ry, tfue not just for our r.lati.... rNr A..ord, thay trad nade lhe rorrd a litr1c bit safer with sone ol rhe thinqs they had donc- clrba.hev said he \- P' . ..,| E!!!!- , ilts *,*-"***.*',,,-@ !e was parti.ula!l!. pleas.d litn corb.chew Fis .loinq ir afshani.tan, vithdrawinq'hat his troops. Afghanisian vas a lrob1€m c..bachew had inherit.d, he had nor bcer irwolw€d in rhe ilhore rortd aplroy€d the cotrrase he sas oJngi L -.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Results of the Moscow Summit and Their Impact on U.S
    About the Results of the Moscow Summit and Their Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy and Soviet-American Relations. As experience shows, final results of such events as the Soviet-American summits become apparent over more or less extended period of time. So far, we can only talk about preliminary results. Among them, the following are the most significant. First of all, the summit brought substantial political and diplomatic results. It is important that we did not allow any breaks in the process of dialog, even though it was possible and even probably due to the U.S. political calendar (the electoral campaign, the situation in which the outgoing administration now finds itself—according to the American political terminology—the state of “lame duck”). Thanks to the summit, the year 1988 did not fall out of the process of normalization of Soviet-American relations; to the contrary, it already became an important marker in their development, which help ensure the continuity: both most likely presidential candidates are simply forced by the logic of events itself to speak positively about Soviet-American relations, about disarmament and other important issues, which were on the agenda. Thus it is as if they are “taking the baton” from Reagan. Furthermore, the preparation for the summit, the summit itself, and the subsequent realization of those agreements, which were achieved or outlined there, do not just cement the constructive changes in Soviet-American relations, but also give them a new impulse for further development in all the spheres— disarmament, resolution of regional problems, and improvement of bilateral relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberty Champion, Volume 5, Issue 18)
    Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University 1987 -- 1988 Liberty University School Newspaper 2-24-1988 02-24-88 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 5, Issue 18) Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_87_88 Recommended Citation "02-24-88 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 5, Issue 18)" (1988). 1987 -- 1988. Paper 17. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_87_88/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School Newspaper at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1987 -- 1988 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Liberty Champion .where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty.-II Cor. 3:17 Vol.5 No. 18 Liberty University, Lynchburg, Va. Wednesday, February 24, 1988 Liberty anticipates mid-term exam arrival INDEX Page 2: NEWSBRIEFS PRO/CON MAN ON STREET Page 3: EDITORIAL NOT RELEVANT WAY I SEE IT Page 4: WEEKENDERS PLAY CAST SELAH STAFF MID-TERMS Page 5: CPAC/SUMMIT WILSON Page 6: WRESTLERS LACROSSE Page 7: LADY FLAMES BASKETBALL LADY FLAMES TRACK MEN'S TRACK MERCER Page 8: STANTON BASKETBALL M-DAC STUDIOUS?—Dave Collins seems ready to face his upcoming mid-terms.—Photo by Donald Hayden. Page 2 February 24,1988 Liberty Champion Political Issues News Kemp vs. Robertson Briefs: By Steve Sitzai Which Should Be The Republican Nominee? From UPI Newswire Kemp our support and the Repub­ A Soviet newspaper (the Kom- military. He has made his cam­ sulted by congress and heads of somokskaya Pravda) says dic­ paign a referendum for the deploy­ lican nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S11695
    November 4, 1997 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S11695 be granted permission to meet during consent to hold a markup on the fol- as an example of devotion to commu- the session of the Senate on Tuesday, lowing nominations: Richard J. Griffin nity. He and his wife have been in- November 4, for purposes of conducting to be Inspector General, Department of volved in, and often led, numerous a full committee hearing which is Veterans Affairs; William P. Greene, community projects in the south Rio scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. The Jr. to be Associate Judge, Court of Vet- Grande Valley. They are also pioneers purpose of this hearing is to consider erans Appeals; Joseph Thompson to be in the effort to forge meaningful and the nominations of Curtis L. Hebert Under Secretary for Benefits, Depart- productive relationships with private and Linda Key Breathitt to be Mem- ment of Veterans Affairs; and and public sector community leaders bers of the Federal Energy Regulatory Espiridion A. Borrego to be Assistant on the Mexican side of the border. Commission. Secretary for Veterans Employment Frank Yturria was first appointed in The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without and Training, Department of Labor; 1990 by President Bush to serve as objection, it is so ordered. The markup will take place in S216, chairman of the Board of Directors of COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC of the Capitol Building, after the first the Inter-American Foundation, a de- WORKS scheduled votes in the Senate on Tues- velopment agency which promotes self- Mr. D’AMATO. Mr. President, I ask day morning, November 4, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of the Cold War: Moscow
    The End of the Cold War: Moscow President Reagan and Nancy Reagan receiving an official greeting from Mikhail Gorbachev and Raisa Gorbachev in St. George's Hall at the Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow. 5/29/88. From the Archives brings primary source documents and exploration into the classroom. These educational resources, carefully curated by our Education team, are meant to enhance historical discussions around relevant topics of today in history, civics, geography, and economics. Overview: Most summits have a specific goal in mind, whether it is a peace treaty, arms negotiation, or trade. Many summits have alternate goals as well. These meetings are often used as an opportunity to get a feel for the other side and their points of view. Other times it is to make a statement to that nation, your own nation, or the world. Sometimes it is about making connections beyond the political ones. The Moscow Summit was very much a Summit of alternate goals rather than substantive ones. President Reagan was determined to make a personal connection with everyday Russians. He wanted to help them understand the people of the United States and for him to better understand the hearts and minds of the Soviet people. Suggested Classroom Activities: Consider having students look at the following documents and analyze what ‘message’ President Reagan was trying to convey. Also, have students hypothesize about which audience the message was directed towards. A student handout follows this page and can help students organize their thoughts when reading and discussing the documents. Notes on Items: Primary Source A: This document is the first part of President Reagan’s Briefing Book and contains the letter from General Colin Powell regarding the sensitivity of the document as well as the cover page and the proposed schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Question and Answer Briefing Sheets (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 41, folder “8/28/74 - Press Conference: Question and Answer Briefing Sheets (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 41 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library L. WILLIAM SEIDMAN QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR PRESIDENTIAL PRESS CONFERENCE L. WILLIAM SEIDMAN Q. Your Press Secretary indicated that you should not be expected to achieve an economic miracle. Was he suggesting that you will be unable to cope with the problem of inflation? If not, how do you plan on dealing with what you have identified as the Nation's No. 1 problem? A. Our position is that inflation is a difficult problem that does not have a quick, easy, or painless solution. In that sense, there is no known miracle cure. But that does not mean we will be paralyzed by the problem. We have acted in establishing, with the cooperation of the Congress, a wage and price monitoring agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Reagan at the 1988 Moscow Summit
    Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session with the Students and Faculty at Moscow State University May 31, 1988 As part of an exchange program, we now have an The President Thank you, Rector Logunov, and I exhibition touring your country that shows how infor- want to thank all of you very much for a very warm mation technology is transforming our lives-replacing welcome. Its a great pleasure to be here at Moscow manual labor with robots, forecasting weather for farm- State University, and I want to thank you all for turn- ers, or mapping the genetic code of DNA for medical ing out. I know you must be very busy this week, study- researchers. These microcomputers today aid the de- ing and taking your final examinations. So, let me just sign of everything from houses to cars to spacecraft; say zhelayu vam uspekha [I wish you success]. Nancy they even design better and faster computers. They couldnt make it today because shes visiting can translate English into Russian or enable the blind Leningrad, which she tells me is a very beautiful city, to read or help Michael Jackson produce on one syn- but she, too, says hello and wishes you all good luck. thesizer the sounds of a whole orchestra. Linked by a Let me say its also a great pleasure to once again network of satellites and fiber-optic cables, one indi- have this opportunity to speak directly to the people of vidual with a desktop computer and a telephone com- the Soviet Union. Before I left Washington, I received mands resources unavailable to the largest governments many heartfelt letters and telegrams asking me to carry just a few years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle Thursday, May 19
    WEEKLY SUMMER EDITION THE CHRONICLE THURSDAY, MAY 19. DUKE UNIVERSITY DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA CIRCULATION: 7,500 VOL. 84. NO. S2 Life Flight forced to make emergency landing Report faults By DAN BERGER A Medical Center Life Flight helicopter administration was forced to make an emergency landing Thursday night at Rockingham County Airport after the shaft connecting the tail By CHRIS SCHMALZER rotor to a gear box severed, causing the A report by the Academic Covin tail rotor to fly off the aircraft. Task Force on University Governance There were no injuries aboard the chop­ has found that fundamental defects in per, an Aerospatiale Twin Star. the decision-making process at the The incident was described as ex­ University have caused "a serious ero­ tremely unusual in genera! and unprecen- sion of confidence among its faculty" dented in the history of the particular and a failure in its academic mission. model, according to a spokesman for the Aerospatiale Helicopter Company, the See page 19 for excerpts of the report makers of the Twin Star and its tail rotor and shaft. National Transportation The committee found two main prob­ Safety Board (NTSB) accident records lems within the University: a lack of covering the past 10 years show that openess in University management there have been no crashes of the Twin and flawed system of gathering infor­ Star over that period similar to Thursday mation at the University. Both prob­ night's problems. lems have caused a movement away The difficulties started at approxi­ from teaching and research. mately 10 p.m. as the helicopter was en GHT/THE CHRONICLE The report also proposes tentative reccommendations for consideration by route to Duke Hospital from Grundy, Va., A Twin Star helicopter similar to the grounded Life Flight copter carrying an 11-year-old trauma victim, the administration over the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Great Communicator and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War1 by Ambassador Eric S. Edelman President Ronald Reagan Is
    The Great Communicator and the Beginning of the End of the Cold War1 By Ambassador Eric S. Edelman President Ronald Reagan is known as the “Great Communicator,” a soubriquet that was awarded to him by New York Times columnist Russell Baker, and which stuck despite Reagan’s disclaimer in his farewell address that he “wasn’t a great communicator” but that he had “communicated great things.” The ideas which animated Reagan’s vision were given voice in a series of extraordinary speeches, many of them justly renowned. Among them are his “Time for Choosing” speech in 1964, his “Shining City on a Hill” speech to CPAC in 1974, his spontaneous remarks at the conclusion of the Republican National Convention in 1976 and, of course, his memorable speeches as President of the United States. These include his “Evil Empire” speech to the National Association of Evangelicals, his remarks at Westminster in 1982, his elegiac comments commemorating the 40th anniversary of the D-Day invasion and mourning the Challenger disaster, and his Berlin speech exhorting Mikhail Gorbachev to “Tear Down this Wall” in 1987, which Time Magazine suggested was one of the 10 greatest speeches of all time.2 Curiously, Reagan’s address to the students of Moscow State University during the 1988 Summit with Mikhail Gorbachev draws considerably less attention today despite the fact that even normally harsh Reagan critics hailed the speech at the time and have continued to cite it subsequently. The New York Times, for instance, described the speech as “Reagan’s finest oratorical hour” and Princeton’s liberal historian Sean Wilentz has called it “the symbolic high point of Reagan’s visit….
    [Show full text]
  • George Shultz, Nuclear Statecraft and the Vision for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons1 Stephan Kieninger
    George Shultz, Nuclear Statecraft and the Vision for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons1 Stephan Kieninger Summary As Secretary of State, George Shultz worked hard to help protect Ronald Reagan’s and Mikhail Gorbachev’s shared goal of a world free of nuclear weapons. This article looks into Shultz’s contribution to Reagan’s groundbreaking arms control diplomacy and its pivotal role for the peaceful end of the Cold War highlighting the contemporary significance of Reagan’s and Shultz’s vision at a time when the global challenge is to build from scratch a new arms control architecture for the 21th century, something that will need strength, patient statecraft and the long-term management of adversarial relations with Russia and China. The article sheds new light on the complexities of Ronald Reagan’s approach: On the one hand, Reagan wanted America’s victory in the battle with the Soviet Union. At the same time, he wanted to abolish nuclear weapons, and reducing nuclear weapons required patient statecraft and the relaunch of U.S.-Soviet cooperation. Ronald Reagan and George Shultz managed to weave these aims together combining strength and diplomacy in new ways in an effort to advance freedom and promote democracy. About the Author Stephan Kieninger is an independent historian and the author of two books on the history of détente and Euro-Atlantic security: The Diplomacy of Détente. Cooperative Security Policies from Helmut Schmidt to George Shultz (2018) and Dynamic Détente. The United States and Europe, 1964– 1975 (2016). He received his PhD from Mannheim University. Formerly, he was a postdoctoral fellow at Johns Hopkins SAIS, a fellow at the Berlin Center for Cold War Studies, and a senior researcher at the Federal German Archives.
    [Show full text]