DOCSLIB.ORG

Gunnison RMP/ROD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

_I ../ United States Deptirtment of the Interior ____ %KEAI! OF LAND MANAGEMENT Montrose District Office 2465 S0ut.h Townsend Montrose, Colorado 8 140 1 February, 1993 Dear Reader: This document is a copy of the Record of Decision, the approved Resource Management Plan, and the Rangeland Program Summary for the Gunnison Resource Area. This Record of Decision approves the Bureau of Land Management decisions in the Resource Management Plan, Chapter Two of this document, for managing approximately 585,012 acres of BLM-administered surface acres and 726,918 acres of BLM-administered mineral estate in the Gunnison Resource Area. This Resource Management Plan has been approved in the Record of Decision as the land use plan for the Gunnison Resource Area for the next lo-12 years. The decisions in the plan will guide all future uses and activities within the Gunnison Resource Area. The Rangeland Program Summary is included in this document in Chapter Three. The Rangeland Program Summary describes and summarizes the livestock grazing management and related decisions that are contained in the land use plan, the rangeland resource management objectives for the Gunnison Resource Area, and the actions intended to achieve those objectives. This document has been sent to all recipients of the Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement published in April, 1992. Copies of this document are available by contacting the BLM at the Gunnison Resource Area, 216 North Colorado, Gunnison, Colorado 81230 (303)641-0471, the Montrose District Office, 2465 South Townsend Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401 (303)249-7791, or the Colorado State Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076 (303)239-3670. We appreciate the input, cooperation, and assistance from the public and land users during the planning process, and are pleased to provide this copy for your reference and use. Please contact BLM at the Gunnison office for further assistance or information regarding the plan. Sincerely yours, Alan L. Kesterke District Manager GUNNISON RESOURCE AREA RECORD OF DECISION, APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND RANGELAND PROGRAM SUMMARY FEBRUARY, 1993 Prepared by: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Colorado State Off& Montrose District Gunnison Resource Area TABLE OF CONTENTS RECORD OF DECISION FOR.THE GUNNISON RESOURCE MANAGEMENTPLAN ......................................... i . Decision ......................................... I Alternatives considered In The Draft Resource . Management Plan ................................... Resolution Of Protests Received On The Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final EIS ................ ii Implementing And Monitoring Decisions . ; .................. ii Maintaining And Amending Decisions ...................... ii Public Involvement .................................. ii . Consistency ....................................... ... Availability Of This Document ......................... 111 State Director’s Signature ............................. iii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .............................. 1-1 Planning Area For The RMP ......................... l-l Relationship To The Bureau Planning System ............... l-l Distribution Of The RMP ............................ l-l Public Involvement And Coordination .................... l-l Changes To The Text Of The RMP And PRMP ............. l-5 Implementing And Monitoring The RMP Decisions ........... l-6 Maintaining And Amending Decisions .................... l-6 Activity Plans And Future Environmental Documentation ....... 1-7 CHAPTER TWO: DESCRIPTION OF THE APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN .................. 2-1 Development And Objectives .......................... 2-1 Standard Management For The Resource Management Plan ..... 2-l Management Unit Prescriptions For The Resource Management Plan (Units 1-16) .................. 2-19 CHAPTER THREE: RANGELAND PROGRAM SUMMARY ................ 3-1 Introduction .................................... 3-1 Rangeland Program Summary Updates ................... 3-1 Consultation, Coordination, And Cooperation ............... 3-1 Livestock Grazing Management Decisions From Standard Management, Chapter Two ............... 3-2 Livestock Grazing Management Decisions From Management Unit Prescriptions, Chapter Two ......... 3-8 APPENDIXES A: Wildlife Management .................................... A-l B: Livestock Grazing Management ............................. B-l c: Preparation, Updating, Or Revision Of Activity Plans In The Resource Management Plan .......................... C-l D: Disposal Tracts, Acquisition Criteria, Rights-of-Way Corridors . Lands And Realty ......................... D-l E: Access ............................................. E-l F: Recreation Management And Off-Highway Vehicle Designations ........ F-l G: Fire Suppression ....................................... G-l H: Designated Areas Of Critical Environmental Concern ............... H-l TOC - 1 I: Soils and Water Resources . ..i.*....... I-l J: Proposed Instream Flow Appropriations . J-l K: Oil and Gas Stipulations . K-n TABLES, LISTS, AND MAPS Tables And Lists 2-1 MANAGEMENT UNIT ACRES AND VALUES IN THE APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ....................................... 2-3 3-1 PARTIAL SUMMARY OF LIVESTOCK GRAZING PROGRAM BY ALLOTMENT ........................................... 3-16 3-2 CATEGORY “I” ALLOTMENT PRIORITIZATION FOR ACTIVITY PLAN DEVELOPMENT/REVISION ...................... .3-19 A-l CDOW LONG RANGE HERD GOALS ............................. A-l A-2 LONG-RANGE ELK HERD GOALS ON PUBLIC LANDS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA ........................................... A-l A-3 LONG-RANGE DEER HERD GOALS ON PUBLIC LANDS WITHIN THE PLANNINGAREA ........................................... A-l A4 ELK AND DEER INTERIM HERD GOALS ON PUBLIC LANDS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA ........................................... A-l A-S MANAGEMENT UNIT NUMBERS KEYED TO CDOW GAME MANAGEMENT UNLTNUMBERSINTHEPLANNINGAREA.. ....................... A-2 GUIDELINES FOR SAGE GROUSE HABITAT MANAGEMENT ............ A-2 NON-GAME MANAGEMENT IN TIMBER MANAGEMENT AREAS ......... A-3 A-6 MITIGATION FOR BIRDS OF PREY HABITAT ...................... A-4 A-7 ALLOTMENTS WHERE A CHANGE IN KIND OF LIVESTOCK WILLOCCUR ............................................. A-5 RANGE READINESS CRITERIA FOR THE GUNNISON RESOURCE AREA ... B-l B-l INDICATORS OF VEGETATIVE READINESS-SEASON LONG RANGE ...... B-2 B-2 LIVESTOCK GRAZING MANAGEMENT ALLOTMENT DATA ............ B-4 PREPARATION, UPDATING, OR REVISION OF ACTIVITY PLANS IN THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................... C-l RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN CATEGORY I DISPOSAL TRACTS ...... D-l E-l AREAS TARGETED FOR ACCESS IN THE APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ....................................... E-l TOC-2 F-l DESIGNATED OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE ROUTES FOR THE GUNNISON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . F-l I-l TARGET 96 BASAL COVER DENSITIES TO BE ACHIEVED FOR WATERSHED NEEDS AND PROTECTION ON SOILS WITH A MODERATE TO SEVERE EROSION POTENTIAL . I-l J-1 PROPOSED INSTREAM FLOW APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISHERY STREAMS - GUNNISON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . J-l K-l SUMMARY.OF FEDERAL OIL, GAS AND GEOTHERMAL STIPULATIONS BY TYPE, MANAGEMENT UNIT, AND ACRES EFFECTED IN THE APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN. K-l OIL AND GAS STIPULATIONS FOR THE APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ,.........................*.... K-2 Maps l-l General Location Map . l-2 l-2 Resource Area and Planning Area Detail . l-3 A-l Crucial Elk and Deer Winter Range In The Planning Area . A-6 A-2 Bighorn Sheep Range In The Planning Area . A-7 A-3 Pronghom Antelope Range In The Planning Area . A-8 D-l Rights-Of-Way Corridors - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . D-3 D-2 Rights-Of-Way Avoidance, Exclusion Areas, And Areas Open To Rights-Of-Way In A Portion Of The APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . D-4 F-l Off-Highway Vehicle Use - Limited Areas - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . F-3 F-2 Designated Routes, Unit 8, S. Beaver Creek Designated ACEC - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . F-4 F-3 Off-Highway Vehicle Use - Closed Areas - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ..*.................................... F-5 F-4 Special Recreation Management Areas In The Planning Area . F-6 G-l Wildfire Suppression Areas - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . G-l H-l Designated ACECs - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . H-l TOC-3 K-l No Surface Occupancy Oil & Gas Stipnalations - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . K-6 K-2 Oil & Gas Timing Limitations - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . K-7 K-3 Controlled Surface Use Stipulations - APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . K-8 Map Of The Proposed Resource Management Plan . Inserted In Document TOC-4 MAP LIST Proposed Resource Management Plan RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE GUNNISON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN The purpose of this Record of Decision document accomplished. The current rate of accomplishment of (ROD) is to approve the Bureau of Land Management these activities and decisions would have continued. (BLM) decisions to manage the approximately Alternative objectives for Alternative B, C, and D 585,012 surface acres and 726,918 acres of mineral were developed by using the objectives that were estate within the Gun&on Resource Area. These developed for the -Resource Capability Analysis decisions, in Chapter Two of this document, will (RCA) portion of the Management Situation Analysis guide management for the next 10 to 12 years. (MSA). The information regarding each affected resource in the RCA was then
Recommended publications
  • The Mystery of Lake San Cristobal: a Natural Lake No More?

    The Mystery of Lake San Cristobal: a Natural Lake No More?

    Reflections: The mystery of Lake San Cristobal: A natural lake no more? By: Lyn Lampert and Camille Richard, Chair and Coordinator, respectively, of the Lake Fork Watershed Stakeholders, Lake City, CO, July, 2008. Like a captivating Agatha Christie novel, Lake San Cristobal is a beautiful mystery. The more one learns about this centerpiece of Hinsdale County, the more unanswered questions one finds. Somehow, it is uniquely refreshing, though, in this age of quantification and precise explanation, to find something that defies complete understanding and description. Lake San Cristobal is one such place, whose manifold mysteries only add to its enchanting allure. The first written record of the glories of this body of water was compiled by a small Army expedition doing the “Reconnaissance of the Ute Country” in 1873. This expedition, led by Lt. E. H. Ruffner, produced the first accurate descriptions of many parts of the San Juan for the outside world. The expedition approached the lake from upstream after doing work in the Baker’s Park (now Silverton) district. As beautiful as the lake is today, it must have been an incredible gem in 1873, without roads, power lines or habitation. Indeed, Ruffner’s description speaks in glowing terms, praising its islands and coves and abundance of ducks and coots. The origin of its name remains a mystery. “San Cristobal” is obviously Spanish in derivation, and many Latin American places are named for Saint Christopher. Saint Christopher was a semi-mythical character from the 3rd century, and today is popularly known as the Patron Saint of Travelers. Frank Hall in his authoritative 1895 “History of Colorado” claims the name of ‘Lake Chrystobal’ was given by US engineer corps staff encamped at the lake during the Ute Country reconnaissance, inspired by a poem of Tennyson.
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail

    COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail

    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
  • 2019 Pesca En Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020

    2019 Pesca En Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020

    C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 Pesca en Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020 cpw.state.co.us CARACTERÍSTICAS EN LÍNEA Echa un vistazo a más Colorado Parks & Wildlife en nuestros canales: VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEOS HERMAN GULCH GREENBACK CUTTHROAT TROUT RECOVERY (RECUPERACIÓN DE TRUCHAS DEGOLLADAS GREENBACK DE HERMAN GULCH) OUT OF WATER: STOCKING NATIVE TROUT IN ALPINE LAKES (FUERA DEL AGUA: ALMACENAMIENTO DE TRUCHAS NATIVAS EN LAGOS ALPINOS) CPW’S WINTER OBTENER LA APP DE STOCKING PROGRAM CPW FISHING: (PROGRAMA DE INVIERNO DE CPW) ¡Descubra más de 1,300 lugares de pesca, HOW TO FILLET A FISH verifique el clima y las (COMO FILETEAR UN PESCADO) condiciones del agua, lea las regulaciones y más! © Vic Schendel CONTENIDO Impreso para distribución gratuita por TABLA DE CONTENIDO COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE (CPW) 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216 ■ 303-297-1192 NOVEDADES: 2019 ................................................ 1 cpw.state.co.us LICENCIAS E INFORMACIÓN ............................... 1–2 NUESTRA MISIÓN: La misión de Colorado Parks and Wildlife es perpetuar los recursos ■ Tasas de licencias y Habitat Stamps ..............................................................1 de vida silvestre del estado, proporcinar un sistema de parques estatales de calidad y brindar oportunidades divertidas y sostenibles de recreación al aire libre que ■ Información de Habitat Stamp ......................................................................1 Avisos de salud ..............................................................................................1
  • Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update

    Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update

    Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 SECTION 2 – COMMUNITY PROFILE ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 History .....................................................................................................................................................................................
  • High Country Conservation Advocates the Wilderness Society Center

    High Country Conservation Advocates the Wilderness Society Center

    High Country Conservation Advocates ● The Wilderness Society ● Center for Biological Diversity ● Rocky Smith ● EcoFlight ● Great Old Broads for Wilderness ● Rocky Mountain Wild ● Colorado Native Plant Society ● Rocky Mountain Recreation Initiative ● Wild Connections ● Quiet Use Coalition ● Central Colorado Wilderness Coalition ● San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council November 18, 2019 Brian Stevens Team Leader BLM Gunnison Field Office 210 West Spencer Ave., Suite A Gunnison, CO 81230 Via email to [email protected] Re: North Powderhorn Fuels Project Dear Mr. Stevens: The following are the comments of High Country Conservation Advocates (HCCA), The Wilderness Society, Center for Biological Diversity, Rocky Smith, EcoFlight, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Rocky Mountain Wild, Colorado Native Plant Society, Rocky Mountain Recreation Initiative, Wild Connections, Quiet Use Coalition, Central Colorado Wilderness Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity, and San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council on the proposed North Powderhorn Fuels Project, as described in the Scoping Letter (SL) of October 18, 2019 and the Draft Proposed Action and Alternatives (DPAA). HCCA is located in Crested Butte, Colorado and has over 900 members. HCCA was founded in 1977 to protect the health and natural beauty of the land, rivers, and wildlife in and around Gunnison County now and for future generations. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. We may be able to support Alternative C should the agency provide more information clearly indicating that treatments outside of the wilderness and WSAs could be justified and, with mitigation, be acceptable.1 We could also support an alternative that allows non-motorized prescribed burning in ponderosa stands within the Powderhorn Wilderness and Wilderness Study Areas, if such treatments would result in treated areas resembling what would exist if natural fire disturbances had been allowed to occur.
  • Inside: Emergence of the Aerobic Biosphere During the Archean-Proterozoic Transition: Challenges of Future Research, by Victor A

    Inside: Emergence of the Aerobic Biosphere During the Archean-Proterozoic Transition: Challenges of Future Research, by Victor A

    VOL. 15, No. 11 A PUBLICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICa NOVEMBER 2005 Inside: Emergence of the aerobic biosphere during the Archean-Proterozoic transition: Challenges of future research, by Victor A. Melezhik et Al., p. 4 Section Meetings: Cordilleran, p. 12 Rocky Mountain, p. 15 VoluMe 15, NuMbeR 11 NOveMbeR 2005 Cover: Paleoproterozoic (2200 Ma) lacustrine dolostone from the Pechenga Greenstone belt, northeast Fennoscandian Shield. Width of field is 15 cm. The laminated red (oxidized) dolostone is anomalously enriched in 13C (δ13C = +8‰), while the overlying material, representing the oldest known traver- GSA TODAY publishes news and information for more than tines in the world, are 13C-depleted (δ13C = −7‰). Note that 18,000 GSA members and subscribing libraries. GSA Today these rocks have experienced greenschist-facies metamor- lead science articles should present the results of exciting new phism. The 13C-rich dolostones from the Fennoscandian Shield research or summarize and synthesize important problems exemplify the evidence for an extreme global perturbation to or issues, and they must be understandable to all in the earth the carbon cycle at this time, although interpretation of these science community. Submit manuscripts to science editors 13 Keith A. Howard, [email protected], or Gerald M. Ross, lacustrine rocks in terms of a global marine δ C excursion is [email protected]. not straightforward. See “emergence of the aerobic biosphere during the Archean-Proterozoic transition: Challenges of future GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) is published 11 research,” by Victor A. Melezhik et al., p. 4–11. times per year, monthly, with a combined April/May issue, by The Geological Society of America, Inc., with offices at 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado.
  • Surface and Subsurface Dynamics of a Perennial Slow-Moving Landslide from Ground, Air and Space

    Surface and Subsurface Dynamics of a Perennial Slow-Moving Landslide from Ground, Air and Space

    Submitted to Nature Communication Surface and subsurface dynamics of a perennial slow-moving landslide from ground, air and space Xie Hu1*, Roland Bürgmann1, William H. Schulz2, and Eric J. Fielding3 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Correspondence to: [email protected] This is a non-peer reviewed pre-print submitted to EarthArXiv. This paper has been submitted to Nature Communication for review. 1 Submitted to Nature Communication Landslides modify the natural landscape and cause fatalities and property damage worldwide. Quantifying landslide dynamics is challenging due to the stochastic nature of the environment. With its large area of ~1 km2 and perennial motions at ~10-20 mm/day, the Slumgullion landslide in Colorado, USA represents an ideal natural laboratory to better understand landslide behavior. Here we use hybrid remote sensing data and methods to recover the four-dimensional surface motions during 2011-2018. We resolve a new mobile area of ~0.35 km2 below the crest of the prehistoric landslide. We construct a mechanical framework to quantify the rheology, subsurface channel geometry, mass flow rate, and spatiotemporally dependent pore-water pressure feedback through a joint analysis of displacement and hydrometeorological measurements from ground, air and space. Variations in recharge, mainly from snowmelt, drive multi-annual decelerations and accelerations, during which the head of the landslide is the most responsive. Our study demonstrates the importance of remotely characterizing often inaccessible, dangerous slopes to better understand landslide mechanisms, landscape modification, and other quasi-static mass fluxes in natural and industrial environments, and will ultimately help reduce landslide hazards.
  • The Wilderness Society Defenders Of

    The Wilderness Society Defenders Of

    The Wilderness Society ● Defenders of Wildlife ● High Country Conservation Advocates ● Wilderness Workshop ● Rocky Mountain Wild ● Great Old Broads for Wilderness ● Western Colorado Congress ● Ridgway Ouray Community Council ● Sheep Mountain Alliance ● Quiet Use Coalition ● Conservation Colorado ● Rocky Smith January 17, 2017 The Wilderness Society, Defenders of Wildlife, High Country Conservation Advocates, Wilderness Workshop, Rocky Mountain Wild, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Western Colorado Congress, Ridgway Ouray Community Council, Sheep Mountain Alliance, Quiet Use Coalition, Conservation Colorado and Rocky Smith are pleased to present the following comments for consideration and incorporation in the assessment phase of the Grand Mesa- Uncompahgre-Gunnison (GMUG) National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan revision. The mission of The Wilderness Society (TWS) is to protect wilderness and inspire Americans to care for our wild places. The GMUG National Forest has long been a priority for TWS. Since its founding in 1935, TWS has worked closely with diverse interests who care about the future of our national forests. We provide scientific, legal, and policy guidance to land managers, communities, local conservation groups, and state and federal decision-makers aimed at ensuring the best management of our public lands. Our 700,000 members and supporters nationwide and, in particular, our more than 19,220 members and supporters in Colorado are deeply interested in forest planning as it pertains to the conservation, restoration, and protection of wildlands, wildlife, water, recreation, and the ability to enjoy public lands for inspiration and spiritual renewal. Defenders of Wildlife (Defenders) is a national non-profit conservation organization founded in 1947 focused on conserving and restoring native species and the habitat upon which they depend.
  • 2017 Briefing Book Colorado Table of Contents Colorado Facts

    2017 Briefing Book Colorado Table of Contents Colorado Facts

    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management 2017 Briefing Book Colorado Table of Contents Colorado Facts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Colorado Economic Contributions ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 History .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Organizational Chart ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Branch Chiefs & Program Leads ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Office Map ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Colorado State Office ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Leadership .........................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1483-A Pamphlet

    Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1483-A Pamphlet

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1483-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE POWDERHORN WILDERNESS STUDY AREA AND CANNIBAL PLATEAU ROADLESS AREA, GUNNISON AND HINSDALE COUNTIES, COLORADO By W. N. Sharp and R. A. Martin, U.S. Geological Survey and M. E. Lane, U.S. Bureau of Mines Studies Related To Wilderness Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Powderhorn Wilderness Study Area and the contiguous Cannibal Plateau Roadless Area (OZZ18), Gunnison National Forest, Gunnison and Hinsdale Counties, Colo. The Powderhorn was established as a wilderness study area by Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976, and the Cannibal Plateau Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE HD by the Forest Service, January, 197 9.
  • Draft Environmental Assessment

    Draft Environmental Assessment

    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT NAME: Alpine Triangle Recreation Area Management Plan Environmental Assessment PLANNING UNIT: Alpine Triangle Special Recreation Management Area LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 40N 7W Sections 2-10, 17, 18. 43N 7W Sections 1, 2, 12-14, 24,25, 41N 6W Sections 3-10, 15-21, 29-31. 35, 36. 41N 7W Sections 1-36. 44N 3W Sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 30, 31. 41N 8W Sections 1, 12, 13, 24, 25, 36. 44N 4W Sections 1,2, 10-15, 22-36. 42N 3W Section 6. 44N 5W Sections 25-29, 32-36. 42N 4W Sections 1-8, 17-19. 44N 6W Sections 2, 26, 32- 36. 42N 5W Sections 1-23, 27-30. 44N 7W Sections 35, 36. 42N 6W Sections 1-34. 45N 3W Sections 6, 7, 19, 30, 31. 42N 7W Sections 1-3, 9-36. 45N 4W Sections 1, 2, 11-14, 23-26, 43N 3W Sections 6-7, 18-19, 30-31. 35, 36. 43N 4W Sections 1- 36. 46N 4W Sections 13, 24, 25, 35, 36. 43N 5W Sections 1- 36. 47N 3W Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 16, 17, 43N 6W Sections 1-36. 19– 21, 28, 29, 31-33. 48N 3W Sections 29- 32. PREPARATION DATE: August 12, 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Columbine Field Office 367 Pearl Street P.O.Box 439 Bayfield, CO 81122 & Gunnison Field Office 216 North Colorado Gunnison, CO 81230 This page left intentionally blank. Final Environmental Assessment Alpine Triangle Recreation Area Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................1
  • Alpine Loop Explorer

    Alpine Loop Explorer

    A guide to the natural and historical resources on the Alpine Loop Backcountry Byway ALPINE EXPLORER scenic drives • hiking • history fall colors • wildflowers • wildlife ALPINE LOOP WELCOME TO THE ALPINE LOOP BACKCOUNTRY BYWAY Looking up the Cottonwood Creek valley ~ Photo courtesy of Bureau of Land Management Depending on winter snows, the Alpine Loop Backcountry Byway opens by late May or early June and closes around late October. Most of the Loop winds through public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service, although many mines and buildings are on private property. Today’s explorers come, summer or winter, in 4-wheel-drive vehicles, ATVs, snowmobiles, mountain bikes, and even 2-wheel-drive cars for a short distance. They explore on foot, horseback, or snowshoes, or ski on the numerous trails. Instead of shovels and gold pans, they carry sketchbooks, cameras, fishing rods, and field guides to help them enjoy the grandeur, scenery, solitude, and wildlife of the remote San Juan backcountry. This gem, the Alpine Loop Backcountry Byway, is your gateway off the beaten track. Uncompahgre Peak (14,309 feet). ~ Photo courtesy of Bureau of Land Management Rising high above the Alpine Loop, the mountains insist that you acknowledge their presence. All around, a kaleidoscope of summer wildflowers gathers along the trails, and the sounds of cascading streams are everywhere. The pure, clear air startles you with its crisp bite, even before your gasp reminds you of the altitude. In front of you the road beckons, leading you higher and higher into an alpine tapestry of greens, browns, whites, and blues.