DOCSLIB.ORG

Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 SECTION 2 – COMMUNITY PROFILE ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 History ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Population ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Government ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2-7 2.4.1 Hinsdale County Government .............................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.4.2 Town of Lake City Government ........................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.5 Economy .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.6 Capability Assessment ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-9 2.6.1 Planning and Regulatory Mitigation Capabilities ......................................................................................... 2-9 2.6.2 Administrative and Technical Mitigation Capabilities ............................................................................. 2-14 2.6.3 Financial Mitigation Capabilities ...................................................................................................................... 2-16 2.6.4 Public Education and Outreach Mitigation Capabilities ......................................................................... 2-17 2.6.5 Special Districts, Stakeholder Agencies, and Other Mitigation partnerships ................................. 2-19 2.6.6 Opportunities for Enhancement ....................................................................................................................... 2-22 SECTION 3 – PLANNING PROCESS .............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Background on Mitigation Planning in Hinsdale County ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 What’s New in the Plan Update .......................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 2014 Plan Section Review and Analysis ........................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Local Government Participation ..................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 The 10-Step Planning Process ........................................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3.1 Phase 1: Organize Resources ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.3.2 Phase 2: Assess Risks ............................................................................................................................................... 3-9 3.3.3 Phase 3: Develop the Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.4 Phase 4: Implement the Plan and Monitor Progress ............................................................................... 3-10 SECTION 4 – RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Hazard Identification and Prioritization ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.1 Methodology and Results...................................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Disaster Declaration History ................................................................................................................................. 4-4 4.1.3 Overview of Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment .......................................................................... 4-6 4.2 Assets Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.2.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.2.2 Assets Exposure ......................................................................................................................................................... 4-7 4.2.3 Development and Population Trends ............................................................................................................ 4-17 4.3 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 4-19 4.3.1 Avalanche ................................................................................................................................................................ 4-19 4.3.2 Dam Incidents .......................................................................................................................................................... 4-29 4.3.3 Drought ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4-40 4.3.4 Earthquake ................................................................................................................................................................ 4-50 Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan | September 2019 Page i Table of Contents 4.3.5 Flooding ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4-66 4.3.6 Landslides, Debris Flow, and Rockfall ............................................................................................................ 4-83 4.3.7 Severe Thunderstorm Activity ........................................................................................................................... 4-92 4.3.8 Severe Winter Storms ......................................................................................................................................... 4-104 4.3.9 Wildfires ................................................................................................................................................................... 4-111 4.3.10 Imminent Threat/Terrorism ........................................................................................................................... 4-126 4.3.11 Hazardous Materials Incidents ..................................................................................................................... 4-129 4.3.12 Pandemic Influenza ........................................................................................................................................... 4-135 4.3.13 Utility Failure ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-140 4.3.14 Transportation Accidents................................................................................................................................ 4-146 SECTION 5 – MITIGATION STRATEGY ......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Mitigation Strategy: Overview........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Valles Uccs 0892N 10345.Pdf (5.476Mb)
    GEOGRAPHY OF NITRATE AND SULFATE ATMOSPHERIC WET DEPOSITION IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS by IVAN GUILLERMO VALLES B.S., Colorado State University—Pueblo, 2005 A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Colorado Colorado Springs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography and Environmental Studies 2018 © 2018 IVAN GUILLERMO VALLES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii This thesis for the Master of Arts degree by Ivan Guillermo Valles has been approved for the Department of Geography of Environmental Studies by Curtis D. Holder, Chair Steve Jennings Brandon Vogt Date January 27, 2018 iii Valles, Ivan Guillermo (M.A., Applied Geography) Geography of Nitrate and Sulfate Atmospheric Wet Deposition in the Southern Rocky Mountains Thesis directed by Professor Curtis Holder. ABSTRACT Data from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program’s National Trends Network, the United States Geological Survey’s Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Program and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Air Markets Program were analyzed to identify spatial relationships amongst atmospheric wet deposition concentrations of nitrate and sulfate. The analysis relates atmospheric wet deposition, commonly known as acid rain, to two distinct variables—as a function of elevation and also as a function of proximity to major regional electricity generating stations. This study focuses on the Southern Rocky Mountain region of the United States, and integrates depositional and emissions point-source data from Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. Previous studies have identified wide-ranging adverse effects upon terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems such as nitrogen saturation, changes in plant biodiversity, and soil nutrient cycling where atmospheric wet deposition is the suspected primary means of pollutant transport and delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery of Lake San Cristobal: a Natural Lake No More?
    Reflections: The mystery of Lake San Cristobal: A natural lake no more? By: Lyn Lampert and Camille Richard, Chair and Coordinator, respectively, of the Lake Fork Watershed Stakeholders, Lake City, CO, July, 2008. Like a captivating Agatha Christie novel, Lake San Cristobal is a beautiful mystery. The more one learns about this centerpiece of Hinsdale County, the more unanswered questions one finds. Somehow, it is uniquely refreshing, though, in this age of quantification and precise explanation, to find something that defies complete understanding and description. Lake San Cristobal is one such place, whose manifold mysteries only add to its enchanting allure. The first written record of the glories of this body of water was compiled by a small Army expedition doing the “Reconnaissance of the Ute Country” in 1873. This expedition, led by Lt. E. H. Ruffner, produced the first accurate descriptions of many parts of the San Juan for the outside world. The expedition approached the lake from upstream after doing work in the Baker’s Park (now Silverton) district. As beautiful as the lake is today, it must have been an incredible gem in 1873, without roads, power lines or habitation. Indeed, Ruffner’s description speaks in glowing terms, praising its islands and coves and abundance of ducks and coots. The origin of its name remains a mystery. “San Cristobal” is obviously Spanish in derivation, and many Latin American places are named for Saint Christopher. Saint Christopher was a semi-mythical character from the 3rd century, and today is popularly known as the Patron Saint of Travelers. Frank Hall in his authoritative 1895 “History of Colorado” claims the name of ‘Lake Chrystobal’ was given by US engineer corps staff encamped at the lake during the Ute Country reconnaissance, inspired by a poem of Tennyson.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • San Juan Landscape Rangeland Environmental Assessment, March
    United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment March 2009 San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Ouray Ranger District and Gunnison Ranger District Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Cover photo: Box Factory Park courtesy of Barry Johnston The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Responsible Officials: Tamera
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RECLAMATION PERMIT for Regglar (112) OPERATION ___ AMENDMENT NOTICE to the BOARD of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS —SBN-Jim- COUNTY
    N OTI CE OP PILING APPLICATION FOR COLORADO MINED LAND RECLAMATION PERMIT FOR REggLAR (112) OPERATION ___ AMENDMENT NOTICE TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS —SBN-Jim- COUNTY Sunnyside Gold^Corporation (the »Applicant/Operator») hag applied for a Regular (112) reclamation permit from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board (the "Board") to conduct mining operations In -----San.Juan____________ County, H i e a t t a c h e d i n f o r m a t i o n is b e i n g provided to notify you of the location and nature of the proposed operation. The entire application is on file with the Division of Minerals and Geology (the "Division") and the local county clerk and recorder, Hie applicant/operator proposes to reclaim the affected land* to recreation md conversion to non-mining use. Pursuant to Section 34-32-116(7) (j), C.R.S., the Board is required to confer with the local Board of County Commissioners before approving of the post-mining land use. Accordingly, the Board would appreciate your comments on the proposed operation. Please note that, in order to preserve your right to a hearing before the Board on this application, you must submit written comments on the application within twenty (20) days of the date of last publication of notice pursuant to Section 34-32-112(10), C.R.S. If you would like to discuss the proposed post-mining land use, or any other issue regarding this application, please contact the Division of Minerals and Geology, 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303) 866-3S67.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncompahgre Wilderness Trails
    TH Little Cimarron TH Big WARNING: Do not use this map for wilderness Blue navigation. It is intended for general reference 864 UNCOMPAHGRE 229 only. Detailed maps are available at the locations 863 East shown on the back panel. Fork 867 TH Fall WILDERNESS 858 861 TH Creek 868 149 Little Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, 232 Elk Fall Creek TH 868 Little Cimarron River & Gunnison National Forests East Fork Cimarron River A 254 231 Straley 03/14/11 12 219 Middle Fork Cimarron River West Fork Cimarron River Owl Creek 233 Pass Sheep Mountain 253 Stealey 219 228 Mountain Big Blue Creek Middle TH Fork 244 860 218 Slide Courthouse Pinnacle 229 Lake Mountain 218 Ridge Dunsinane Elk Creek 144 Mountain 218 857 Precipice 211 Peak 243 Dixie 550 258 Ridge Porphory 227 Basin Silver Jack 232 Mine Ruins 235 212 Silver Mountain 216 216 234 TH Independence 138 226 231 228 233 137 Cutler Redcliff 244 Peak TH 236 235 216 Coxcomb Peak 227 232 872 220 236.3A 217 132 142 Uncompahgre Peak Larson 14,309 Ft Lakes Matterhorn 135 228 239 Lake Fork Gunnison River Peak 871 Cow Creek Uncompahgre 236 B Wetterhorn Wetterhorn 239 TH 149 Peak Basin Peak 233 14 14,015 Ft 205 233 233 226 Crystal Peak 256 235 136 Crystal Uncompahgre River 214 Bighorn Larson 241 Ridge 245 Crystal Broken 238 TH North Hill Lake Bridge of 236 215 Heaven 877 226 TH Matterhorn USFS 140 Lake City 1 Mile Blackwall BLM Mountain Ouray 870 215 20 Alpine Loop USFS Capitol City Scenic Byway Primary Highway Summit Over 13,000 Feet Wildhorse BLM (Site) Peak Improved Road Stock May Be Restricted Hensen Creek A1 Dallas A2 Courthouse Mountain A3 Sheep Mountain Primitive Road TH Trailhead TH Bear 241 A4 Alpine Plateau Creek B1 Ouray National Forest Trail 235 National Forest Trail Sunshine B2 Wetterhorn Peak American Darley Varden Flats Mountain B3 Uncompahgre Peak NOTICE: Sheep grazing is permitted in the Uncompahgre Wilderness, Mountain B4 Lake City and livestock protection dogs may be encountered near bands of Forest Boundary 118 National Forest Road sheep.
    [Show full text]
  • A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
    A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 120+ Resorts Worldwide North America | Europe | Japan | South America
    OFFERING INCLUSIVE SKI PACKAGES TO 120+ RESORTS WORLDWIDE NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | JAPAN | SOUTH AMERICA CALL US TODAY AT 844-848-9778 © Justa Jeskova, Whistler Blackcomb SKI.COM’S FEATURED RESORTS UNITED STATES CANADA EUROPE COLORADO ALBERTA AUSTRIA ASPEN 6 BANFF AND LAKE LOUISE 22 INNSBRUCK 26 BEAVER CREEK 7 KITZBÜHEL 27 BRECKENRIDGE 8 BRITISH COLUMBIA ST. ANTON 28 COPPER MOUNTAIN 9 WHISTLER BLACKCOMB 23 CRESTED BUTTE 10 THE POWDER HIGHWAY 24 FRANCE KEYSTONE 11 CHAMONIX 29 SNOWMASS 12 COURCHEVEL 30 STEAMBOAT 13 VAL D’ISÈRE 31 TELLURIDE 14 JAPAN VAIL 15 ITALY WINTER PARK 16 FURANO 37 CORTINA 32 COURMAYEUR 33 IDAHO HAKUBA 37 KIRORO 38 SUN VALLEY 17 NISEKO 39 SWITZERLAND RUSUTSU 39 ST. MORITZ 34 MONTANA ZERMATT 35 BIG SKY 18 UTAH DEER VALLEY RESORT 19 PARK CITY MOUNTAIN RESORT 20 WYOMING JACKSON HOLE 21 OTHER VACATION PLANNING INFORMATION Just a sampling of our FROM BUDGET TO LUXURY 2 COMPLETE SKI VACATION PACKAGE 3 RESORT STATS TRIP INSURANCE 3 WESTERN UNITED STATES 40 GROUP SKI TRIPS 4 120+ EASTERN UNITED STATES 41 CAT AND HELI-SKIING 5 RESORTS WORLDWIDE CANADA 41 SKI THE POWDER HIGHWAY 24 EUROPE 42 SKI EUROPE 25 Visit ski.com/resorts or turn to page JAPAN 43 SKI JAPAN 36 40 for the full list. SOUTH AMERICA 43 TERMS & CONDITIONS 44 KEY: RESORT “BEST KNOWN FOR” ICONS LUXURY FAMILY FRIENDLY BEGINNER INTERMEDIATE EXPERT BUDGET DINING NIGHTLIFE ACTIVITIES SHOPPING SKI-IN/SKI-OUT SPA TERRAIN PARK ACCESS For more information about Ski.com’s full resort inventory, visit www.ski.com or call your Ski.com Mountain Travel Expert at 844-848-9778.
    [Show full text]
  • CODOS – Colorado Dust-On-Snow – WY 2009 Update #1, February 15, 2009
    CODOS – Colorado Dust-on-Snow – WY 2009 Update #1, February 15, 2009 Greetings from Silverton, Colorado on the 3-year anniversary of the February 15, 2006 dust-on-snow event that played such a pivotal role in the early and intense snowmelt runoff of Spring 2006. This CODOS Update will kick off the Water Year 2009 series of Updates and Alerts designed to keep you apprised of dust- on-snow conditions in the Colorado mountains. We welcome two new CODOS program participants – Northern Colorado Water Conservation District and Animas-LaPlata Water Conservancy District – to our list of past and ongoing supporters – Colorado River Water Conservation District, Southwestern Water Conservation District, Rio Grande Water Conservation District, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, Tri-County Water Conservancy District, Denver Water, and Western Water Assessment-CIRES. This season we will issue “Updates” to inform you about observed dust layers in your watersheds, and how they are likely to influence snowmelt timing and rates in the near term, given the National Weather Service’s 7-10 forecast. We will also issue “Alerts” to give you a timely “heads up” about either an imminent or actual dust-on-snow deposition event in progress. Several other key organizations monitoring and forecasting weather, snowpack, and streamflows on your behalf will also receive these products, as a courtesy. As you may know, some Colorado ranges already have a significant dust layer within the snowpack. The photo below taken at our Swamp Angel Study Plot near Red Mountain Pass on January 1 shows, very distinctly, a significant dust layer deposited on December 13, 2008, now deeply buried under 1 meter of snow.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Telluride Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE TELLURIDE QUADRANGLE. INTRODUCTION. along the southern base, and agricultural lands water Jura of other parts of Colorado, and follow­ vents from which the lavas came are unknown, A general statement of the geography, topography, have been found in valley bottoms or on lower ing them comes the Cretaceous section, from the and the lavas themselves have been examined slopes adjacent to the snow-fed streams Economic Dakota to the uppermost coal-bearing member, the only in sufficient degree to show the predominant and geology of the San Juan region of from the mountains. With the devel- imp°rtance- Colorado. Laramie. Below Durango the post-Laramie forma­ presence of andesites, with other types ranging opment of these resources several towns of tion, made up of eruptive rock debris and known in composition from rhyolite to basalt. Pene­ The term San Juan region, or simply " the San importance have been established in sheltered as the "Animas beds," rests upon the Laramie, trating the bedded series are several massive Juan," used with variable meaning by early valleys on all sides. Railroads encircle the group and is in turn overlain by the Puerco and higher bodies of often coarsely granular rocks, such as explorers, and naturally with indefinite and penetrate to some of the mining centers of Eocene deposits. gabbro and diorite, and it now seems probable limitation during the period of settle- sa^juan the the interior. Creede, Silverton, Telluride, Ouray, Structurally, the most striking feature in the that the intrusive bodies of diorite-porphyry and ment, is. now quite.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Pesca En Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020
    C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 Pesca en Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020 cpw.state.co.us CARACTERÍSTICAS EN LÍNEA Echa un vistazo a más Colorado Parks & Wildlife en nuestros canales: VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEOS HERMAN GULCH GREENBACK CUTTHROAT TROUT RECOVERY (RECUPERACIÓN DE TRUCHAS DEGOLLADAS GREENBACK DE HERMAN GULCH) OUT OF WATER: STOCKING NATIVE TROUT IN ALPINE LAKES (FUERA DEL AGUA: ALMACENAMIENTO DE TRUCHAS NATIVAS EN LAGOS ALPINOS) CPW’S WINTER OBTENER LA APP DE STOCKING PROGRAM CPW FISHING: (PROGRAMA DE INVIERNO DE CPW) ¡Descubra más de 1,300 lugares de pesca, HOW TO FILLET A FISH verifique el clima y las (COMO FILETEAR UN PESCADO) condiciones del agua, lea las regulaciones y más! © Vic Schendel CONTENIDO Impreso para distribución gratuita por TABLA DE CONTENIDO COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE (CPW) 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216 ■ 303-297-1192 NOVEDADES: 2019 ................................................ 1 cpw.state.co.us LICENCIAS E INFORMACIÓN ............................... 1–2 NUESTRA MISIÓN: La misión de Colorado Parks and Wildlife es perpetuar los recursos ■ Tasas de licencias y Habitat Stamps ..............................................................1 de vida silvestre del estado, proporcinar un sistema de parques estatales de calidad y brindar oportunidades divertidas y sostenibles de recreación al aire libre que ■ Información de Habitat Stamp ......................................................................1 Avisos de salud ..............................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]