DOCSLIB.ORG

San Juan Landscape Rangeland Environmental Assessment, March

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Juan Landscape Rangeland Environmental Assessment, March United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment March 2009 San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Ouray Ranger District and Gunnison Ranger District Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Cover photo: Box Factory Park courtesy of Barry Johnston The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Responsible Officials: Tamera Randall-Parker, District Ranger Ouray Ranger District 2505 South Townsend Montrose, CO 81401 James Dawson, District Ranger Gunnison Ranger District 216 North Colorado St. Gunnison, CO 81230 Charles Richmond, Forest Supervisor Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre & Gunnison NF 2250 Hwy 50 Delta, CO 81504 For Information Contact: Kelley Liston, Range Conservationist 2505 South Townsend Montrose, CO 81401 970-240-5408 [email protected] Abstract: This Environmental Assessment discloses the effects of three alternatives related to livestock grazing on twenty-three range allotments on the Ouray and Gunnison Ranger Districts on the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests. The three alternatives analyzed include No Permitted Livestock Grazing, Existing Condition (“No Action”) and Proposed Action which includes combining and closing individual allotments to better allow adaptive management to meet forest and national goals. This Environmental Assessment (EA) is a public document that provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). It reveals the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of a proposed action and alternative actions for permitted domestic livestock grazing management within the San Juan Landscape analysis area. This document follows the format established in the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations {CFR} §1500-1508). It includes a discussion of the need for the proposal; alternatives to the proposal; the physical, biological, social and economic impacts of the proposed action and alternatives; and a listing of agencies and persons consulted. It is tiered to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) for the 1986 Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended (Forest Plan) for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests. i San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment ii Environmental Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Table of Contents Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for Action ........................................................................ 3 1.0 Document Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose of and Need for Action............................................................................................ 4 1.3 Summary of the Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 5 1.4 Authorizing Actions.............................................................................................................. 5 1.4.1 Laws and Acts.......................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Forest Service Handbook (FSH) ...................... 7 1.4.3 Permits, Plans and Instructions (FSM and FSH) ..................................................... 8 1.5 Decision Framework ............................................................................................................. 9 1.6 Public Involvement ............................................................................................................... 9 1.6 Conformance with Forest Plan............................................................................................ 10 1.7 Issues................................................................................................................................... 12 1.7.1 Key Issues .............................................................................................................. 12 1.7.2 Non-key Issues....................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the proposed action .................................................... 17 2.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Alternatives Considered in Detail ....................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 No Permitted Livestock Grazing (No Grazing) Alternative.................................. 17 2.1.2 Existing Condition (“No Action”) Alternative ...................................................... 18 2.1.3 Proposed Action Alternative (Adaptive Management).......................................... 19 2.1.4 Proposed Design Criteria ....................................................................................... 24 2.1.5 Proposed Monitoring Requirements ...................................................................... 36 2.1.6 Summary of Alternatives ....................................................................................... 39 2.2 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study............................................ 46 2.2.1 Convert Active Sheep Allotments to Cattle Allotments........................................ 47 2.2.2 Middle Fork Livestock Driveway Use................................................................... 47 2.2.3 Closing Sheep Allotments in Wilderness .............................................................. 47 2.2.4 Reallocation of use on the Bear Creek Allotment ................................................. 48 2.3 Comparison of Alternatives ................................................................................................ 48 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................... 55 3.0 General Affected Environment Information ....................................................................... 55 3.0.1 Current Allotment Status ....................................................................................... 55 3.0.2 Activities that Affect Ground Conditions.............................................................. 56 3.1 Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 57 3.1.1 Affected Environment............................................................................................ 57 3.1.2 No Grazing Alternative Environmental Consequences ......................................... 59 3.1.3 Existing Condition & Proposed Action Alternatives Environmental Consequences ......................................................................................................................................... 60 3.1.4 Cumulative Effects................................................................................................. 60 3.2 Soils & Geology.................................................................................................................. 60 3.2.1 Affected Environment............................................................................................ 60 3.2.2 No Grazing Alternative Environmental Consequences ......................................... 61 3.2.3 Existing Condition Alternative Environmental Consequences.............................. 61 3.2.4 Proposed Action Alternative Environmental Consequences ................................. 62 3.2.5 Cumulative Effects................................................................................................. 62 iii San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment 3.2.6 Mitigation and Monitoring..................................................................................... 62 3.3 Watershed Resources...........................................................................................................63 3.3.1 Affected Environment...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Gilia Sedifolia Brandeg. (Stonecrop Gilia): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Gilia sedifolia Brandeg. (stonecrop gilia): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project August 9, 2004 David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 8002 Campus Delivery — Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Anderson, D.G. (2004, August 9). Gilia sedifolia Brandeg. (stonecrop gilia): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/giliasedifolia.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Bill Jennings, Susan Komarek, Peggy Lyon, J. Mark Porter, and James Reveal. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, classification, and ecology ofGilia sedifolia were crucial to this project. The rediscovery of this species and its subsequent documentation are solely the work of Susan Komarek; without her efforts very little could be said about this species. J. Mark Porter’s thoughts and insights into this species have contributed greatly to our understanding of G. sedifolia. Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, Beth Burkhart, and Joy Bartlett assisted with questions and project management. Jane Nusbaum, Carmen Morales, Betty Eckert, Candyce Jeffery, and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Amy Lavender assisted with the production of the potential habitat distribution map. Annette Miller provided information for the report on seed storage status. Nan Lederer and Tim Hogan provided valuable assistance and insights at the CU Herbarium, as did Janet Wingate and Loraine Yeatts at the Kalmbach Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Watersheds, Water, and Soil Resources March 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Watersheds, Water, and Soil Resources March 2018 Taylor River above Taylor Dam, Gunnison Ranger District In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 End-Of-Season Report
    COLOradO FOURTEENers INITIATIVE 1600 Jackson Street, Suite 352 • Golden, CO 80401 • (303) 278-7650 • www.14ers.org In this season of thankful reflection, we at Colorado Fourteeners Initiative want to acknowledge the many people like you who have contributed their time, talents and donations to help preserve and protect the Fourteeners. Our work would not be possible without your generosity. On behalf of CFI’s board and staff, please accept my sincere thanks for your continued support of our important mission. Lloyd F. Athearn Executive Director Future Projects >> Planning, logistics and fundraising are under way for a multi-year effort to reconstruct the three established routes on Mount Elbert, the state high point. Botanical surveys this summer found a couple of extremely rare plants within the identified trail corridor for the Southeast Ridge route. $315,000 After of in-kind value provided by these Opened 30th sustainably designed summit route volunteer efforts. featuring raised turnpikes and staircases. CFI SMASHES RECORDS AGAIN IN 2015 >> Trail maintenance staff increased from six members to eight. The up to sustainable levels will cost $24 million—$18 million to build 16 two four-person crews set an all-time record by engaging 1,550 days new sustainable routes and $6 million to continue reconstructing 26 of volunteer trail stewardship through 60 projects on 23 routes. This previously delineated routes. volunteer work provided an in-kind value of more than $315,000. >> CFI crews and volunteer Peak Stewards made an all-time high >> CFI opened its 30th sustainably designed route this summer: El number of on-mountain hiker contacts to impart Leave No Trace Diente Peak’s Kilpacker Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncompahgre Wilderness Trails
    TH Little Cimarron TH Big WARNING: Do not use this map for wilderness Blue navigation. It is intended for general reference 864 UNCOMPAHGRE 229 only. Detailed maps are available at the locations 863 East shown on the back panel. Fork 867 TH Fall WILDERNESS 858 861 TH Creek 868 149 Little Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, 232 Elk Fall Creek TH 868 Little Cimarron River & Gunnison National Forests East Fork Cimarron River A 254 231 Straley 03/14/11 12 219 Middle Fork Cimarron River West Fork Cimarron River Owl Creek 233 Pass Sheep Mountain 253 Stealey 219 228 Mountain Big Blue Creek Middle TH Fork 244 860 218 Slide Courthouse Pinnacle 229 Lake Mountain 218 Ridge Dunsinane Elk Creek 144 Mountain 218 857 Precipice 211 Peak 243 Dixie 550 258 Ridge Porphory 227 Basin Silver Jack 232 Mine Ruins 235 212 Silver Mountain 216 216 234 TH Independence 138 226 231 228 233 137 Cutler Redcliff 244 Peak TH 236 235 216 Coxcomb Peak 227 232 872 220 236.3A 217 132 142 Uncompahgre Peak Larson 14,309 Ft Lakes Matterhorn 135 228 239 Lake Fork Gunnison River Peak 871 Cow Creek Uncompahgre 236 B Wetterhorn Wetterhorn 239 TH 149 Peak Basin Peak 233 14 14,015 Ft 205 233 233 226 Crystal Peak 256 235 136 Crystal Uncompahgre River 214 Bighorn Larson 241 Ridge 245 Crystal Broken 238 TH North Hill Lake Bridge of 236 215 Heaven 877 226 TH Matterhorn USFS 140 Lake City 1 Mile Blackwall BLM Mountain Ouray 870 215 20 Alpine Loop USFS Capitol City Scenic Byway Primary Highway Summit Over 13,000 Feet Wildhorse BLM (Site) Peak Improved Road Stock May Be Restricted Hensen Creek A1 Dallas A2 Courthouse Mountain A3 Sheep Mountain Primitive Road TH Trailhead TH Bear 241 A4 Alpine Plateau Creek B1 Ouray National Forest Trail 235 National Forest Trail Sunshine B2 Wetterhorn Peak American Darley Varden Flats Mountain B3 Uncompahgre Peak NOTICE: Sheep grazing is permitted in the Uncompahgre Wilderness, Mountain B4 Lake City and livestock protection dogs may be encountered near bands of Forest Boundary 118 National Forest Road sheep.
    [Show full text]
  • CODOS – Colorado Dust-On-Snow – WY 2009 Update #1, February 15, 2009
    CODOS – Colorado Dust-on-Snow – WY 2009 Update #1, February 15, 2009 Greetings from Silverton, Colorado on the 3-year anniversary of the February 15, 2006 dust-on-snow event that played such a pivotal role in the early and intense snowmelt runoff of Spring 2006. This CODOS Update will kick off the Water Year 2009 series of Updates and Alerts designed to keep you apprised of dust- on-snow conditions in the Colorado mountains. We welcome two new CODOS program participants – Northern Colorado Water Conservation District and Animas-LaPlata Water Conservancy District – to our list of past and ongoing supporters – Colorado River Water Conservation District, Southwestern Water Conservation District, Rio Grande Water Conservation District, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, Tri-County Water Conservancy District, Denver Water, and Western Water Assessment-CIRES. This season we will issue “Updates” to inform you about observed dust layers in your watersheds, and how they are likely to influence snowmelt timing and rates in the near term, given the National Weather Service’s 7-10 forecast. We will also issue “Alerts” to give you a timely “heads up” about either an imminent or actual dust-on-snow deposition event in progress. Several other key organizations monitoring and forecasting weather, snowpack, and streamflows on your behalf will also receive these products, as a courtesy. As you may know, some Colorado ranges already have a significant dust layer within the snowpack. The photo below taken at our Swamp Angel Study Plot near Red Mountain Pass on January 1 shows, very distinctly, a significant dust layer deposited on December 13, 2008, now deeply buried under 1 meter of snow.
    [Show full text]
  • Outing Description Day, Date, Summer 2013 Difficulty Rating, Departure Time Printer-Friendly Version
    Outing Description Day, Date, Summer 2013 Difficulty Rating, Departure Time Printer-friendly version Total Length & Logistics, outing rules, meeting places, and difficulty ratings & Departure Place E-mail schedule changes and updates to: Lyle Hancock. Elevation Schedule changes and trip updates are in red Gain If you have received this schedule by mail, please keep in mind that additions and changes are continually being made. Please ask someone with internet access to inform you when these updates occur or go to a friends computer or the library to view the updates at www.seniorsoutdoors.org. Participation in Seniors Outdoors! activities by non-members is limited to two outings per year. Visitors who wish to actively participate are expected to join Seniors Outdoors! Participants (new & old) as we start the season please review the Guidelines for Outing Participants found on the SO! Web Site. It contains important information about our requirements and general alpine safety. Meeting Place Abbreviations: ACP: Animas City Park; TC: Trimble Crossing; Tam: Tamarron; DMR: Durango Mountain Resort; SRP: Santa Rita Park; RC: Rec Center Sun June 9 Hike Fourmile Falls. Hike to Fourmile falls, enjoying views of Eagle Peak on Moderate to the way. There are several falls to view in this area, so mileage depends on falls. Hard to SRP 8:30 am how much we explore. Carpool $9. lake 6 8 miles RSVP: Sandy Hoagland 247-3678 or [email protected] 800' Mon June 10 Cascade to Coal Bank: Hike to Engineer Plateau via Engineer Mtn. Trail from FS Hard work center near Cascade and then down to Coal Bank on the Pass Creek Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update
    Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 SECTION 2 – COMMUNITY PROFILE ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 History .....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]