DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT NAME: Alpine Triangle Recreation Area Management Plan Environmental Assessment PLANNING UNIT: Alpine Triangle Special Recreation Management Area LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 40N 7W Sections 2-10, 17, 18. 43N 7W Sections 1, 2, 12-14, 24,25, 41N 6W Sections 3-10, 15-21, 29-31. 35, 36. 41N 7W Sections 1-36. 44N 3W Sections 6, 7, 18, 19, 30, 31. 41N 8W Sections 1, 12, 13, 24, 25, 36. 44N 4W Sections 1,2, 10-15, 22-36. 42N 3W Section 6. 44N 5W Sections 25-29, 32-36. 42N 4W Sections 1-8, 17-19. 44N 6W Sections 2, 26, 32- 36. 42N 5W Sections 1-23, 27-30. 44N 7W Sections 35, 36. 42N 6W Sections 1-34. 45N 3W Sections 6, 7, 19, 30, 31. 42N 7W Sections 1-3, 9-36. 45N 4W Sections 1, 2, 11-14, 23-26, 43N 3W Sections 6-7, 18-19, 30-31. 35, 36. 43N 4W Sections 1- 36. 46N 4W Sections 13, 24, 25, 35, 36. 43N 5W Sections 1- 36. 47N 3W Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 16, 17, 43N 6W Sections 1-36. 19– 21, 28, 29, 31-33. 48N 3W Sections 29- 32. PREPARATION DATE: August 12, 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Columbine Field Office 367 Pearl Street P.O.Box 439 Bayfield, CO 81122 & Gunnison Field Office 216 North Colorado Gunnison, CO 81230 This page left intentionally blank. Final Environmental Assessment Alpine Triangle Recreation Area Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need ..........................................................................................................3 1.3 Overall Vision ................................................................................................................3 1.4 Description of the Project Area ....................................................................................4 1.5 Planning Process and Public Involvement ..................................................................4 1.6 Conformance with the Land Use Plan .........................................................................6 1.7 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or other Plans ................................................7 1.7.1 Federal Regulations .........................................................................................7 1.7.2 State Laws ........................................................................................................9 1.7.3 BLM Policies and Programs ............................................................................9 1.8 Issues, Concerns and Opportunities ............................................................................9 1.9 Decision to be Made ....................................................................................................12 1.10 Summary ......................................................................................................................13 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................14 2.1 Management Common to All Alternatives (MCA) ..................................................14 2.1.1 Law, Regulation, Policy or Administrative Action .......................................14 2.1.2 Travel Management and Access ....................................................................16 2.1.3 Recreation Management Spring, Summer, and Fall Use ...............................20 2.1.4 Recreation Management Winter Use .............................................................22 2.1.5 Recreation Management Resource Protection ...............................................23 2.1.6 Recreation Management Facilities, Signs, Interpretation and Education ......25 2.1.7 Recreation Administration .............................................................................27 2.1.8 Recreation Information, Education and Marketing .......................................27 2.1.9 Recreation Monitoring ...................................................................................29 2.1.10 Recreation Collaboration ...............................................................................30 2.2 Alternative A, Current Management/No Action ......................................................30 2.2.1 Law, Regulation and Policy and Administrative Action ...............................30 2.2.2 Travel Management and Access ....................................................................31 2.2.3 Recreation Management Spring, Summer and Fall Use ................................31 2.2.4 Recreation Management Winter Use .............................................................32 2.2.5 Recreation Management Resource Protection ...............................................32 2.3 Alternative B - Proposed Action ................................................................................32 2.3.1 Recreation Management Zone 1 – Alpine Backcountry ................................35 2.3.2 Recreation Management Zone 2 – Heritage Roads .......................................37 2.3.3 Recreation Management Zone 3 – Animas & Lake Fork Rivers ...................39 2.3.4 Law, Regulation, and Policy ..........................................................................41 2.3.5 Travel Management and Access ....................................................................41 2.3.6 Recreation Management Spring, Summer and Fall Use ................................47 2.3.7 Recreation Management Winter Use .............................................................49 2.3.8 Recreation Management Resource Protection ...............................................50 2.3.9 Recreation Management Facilities, Signs, Interpretation and Education ......50 2.3.10 Recreation Administration .............................................................................51 2.3.11 Recreation Information, Education and Marketing .......................................51 i Final Environmental Assessment Alpine Triangle Recreation Area Management Plan 2.3.12 Recreation Monitoring ...................................................................................53 2.3.13 Recreation Collaboration ...............................................................................53 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Detail ...............................................54 2.5 Summary of Impacts ...................................................................................................56 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .......................................................60 3.1 General Setting ............................................................................................................60 3.2 Resources Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ..........................................................60 3.2.1 Air Quality .....................................................................................................60 3.2.2 Climate ...........................................................................................................62 3.2.3 Environmental Justice ....................................................................................62 3.2.4 Hazardous Wastes ..........................................................................................64 3.2.5 Lands and Realty............................................................................................64 3.2.6 Livestock Grazing ..........................................................................................65 3.2.7 Mineral Resources .........................................................................................65 3.2.8 Noise ..............................................................................................................66 3.2.9 Public Health and Safety ................................................................................67 3.2.10 Soils................................................................................................................68 3.2.11 Water Quality (Surface and Ground) .............................................................69 3.2.12 Wild and Scenic Rivers ..................................................................................71 3.3 Resources Brought Forward for Detailed Analysis ..................................................72 3.3.1 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern......................................................72 3.3.2 Cultural Resources .........................................................................................73 3.3.3 Recreation ......................................................................................................76 3.3.4 Socioeconomics .............................................................................................87 3.3.5 Transportation and Access .............................................................................93 3.3.6 Vegetation ......................................................................................................96 3.3.7 Visual Resources ..........................................................................................101 3.3.8 Wilderness and Wilderness Study Areas .....................................................104 3.3.9 Wildlife, Special-Status Species, and Threatened and Endangered Species105 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................................................113
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery of Lake San Cristobal: a Natural Lake No More?
    Reflections: The mystery of Lake San Cristobal: A natural lake no more? By: Lyn Lampert and Camille Richard, Chair and Coordinator, respectively, of the Lake Fork Watershed Stakeholders, Lake City, CO, July, 2008. Like a captivating Agatha Christie novel, Lake San Cristobal is a beautiful mystery. The more one learns about this centerpiece of Hinsdale County, the more unanswered questions one finds. Somehow, it is uniquely refreshing, though, in this age of quantification and precise explanation, to find something that defies complete understanding and description. Lake San Cristobal is one such place, whose manifold mysteries only add to its enchanting allure. The first written record of the glories of this body of water was compiled by a small Army expedition doing the “Reconnaissance of the Ute Country” in 1873. This expedition, led by Lt. E. H. Ruffner, produced the first accurate descriptions of many parts of the San Juan for the outside world. The expedition approached the lake from upstream after doing work in the Baker’s Park (now Silverton) district. As beautiful as the lake is today, it must have been an incredible gem in 1873, without roads, power lines or habitation. Indeed, Ruffner’s description speaks in glowing terms, praising its islands and coves and abundance of ducks and coots. The origin of its name remains a mystery. “San Cristobal” is obviously Spanish in derivation, and many Latin American places are named for Saint Christopher. Saint Christopher was a semi-mythical character from the 3rd century, and today is popularly known as the Patron Saint of Travelers. Frank Hall in his authoritative 1895 “History of Colorado” claims the name of ‘Lake Chrystobal’ was given by US engineer corps staff encamped at the lake during the Ute Country reconnaissance, inspired by a poem of Tennyson.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Watersheds, Water, and Soil Resources March 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests REVISED DRAFT Forest Assessments: Watersheds, Water, and Soil Resources March 2018 Taylor River above Taylor Dam, Gunnison Ranger District In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • San Juan Landscape Rangeland Environmental Assessment, March
    United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment March 2009 San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Ouray Ranger District and Gunnison Ranger District Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Cover photo: Box Factory Park courtesy of Barry Johnston The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Responsible Officials: Tamera
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncompahgre Wilderness Trails
    TH Little Cimarron TH Big WARNING: Do not use this map for wilderness Blue navigation. It is intended for general reference 864 UNCOMPAHGRE 229 only. Detailed maps are available at the locations 863 East shown on the back panel. Fork 867 TH Fall WILDERNESS 858 861 TH Creek 868 149 Little Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, 232 Elk Fall Creek TH 868 Little Cimarron River & Gunnison National Forests East Fork Cimarron River A 254 231 Straley 03/14/11 12 219 Middle Fork Cimarron River West Fork Cimarron River Owl Creek 233 Pass Sheep Mountain 253 Stealey 219 228 Mountain Big Blue Creek Middle TH Fork 244 860 218 Slide Courthouse Pinnacle 229 Lake Mountain 218 Ridge Dunsinane Elk Creek 144 Mountain 218 857 Precipice 211 Peak 243 Dixie 550 258 Ridge Porphory 227 Basin Silver Jack 232 Mine Ruins 235 212 Silver Mountain 216 216 234 TH Independence 138 226 231 228 233 137 Cutler Redcliff 244 Peak TH 236 235 216 Coxcomb Peak 227 232 872 220 236.3A 217 132 142 Uncompahgre Peak Larson 14,309 Ft Lakes Matterhorn 135 228 239 Lake Fork Gunnison River Peak 871 Cow Creek Uncompahgre 236 B Wetterhorn Wetterhorn 239 TH 149 Peak Basin Peak 233 14 14,015 Ft 205 233 233 226 Crystal Peak 256 235 136 Crystal Uncompahgre River 214 Bighorn Larson 241 Ridge 245 Crystal Broken 238 TH North Hill Lake Bridge of 236 215 Heaven 877 226 TH Matterhorn USFS 140 Lake City 1 Mile Blackwall BLM Mountain Ouray 870 215 20 Alpine Loop USFS Capitol City Scenic Byway Primary Highway Summit Over 13,000 Feet Wildhorse BLM (Site) Peak Improved Road Stock May Be Restricted Hensen Creek A1 Dallas A2 Courthouse Mountain A3 Sheep Mountain Primitive Road TH Trailhead TH Bear 241 A4 Alpine Plateau Creek B1 Ouray National Forest Trail 235 National Forest Trail Sunshine B2 Wetterhorn Peak American Darley Varden Flats Mountain B3 Uncompahgre Peak NOTICE: Sheep grazing is permitted in the Uncompahgre Wilderness, Mountain B4 Lake City and livestock protection dogs may be encountered near bands of Forest Boundary 118 National Forest Road sheep.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Doc # Telluride, Silverton, Ouray, Lake City: Colorado
    CIVSF69ID0QF # PDF ^ Telluride, Silverton, Ouray, Lake City: Colorado, USA Telluride, Silverton, Ouray, Lake City: Colorado, USA Filesize: 8.96 MB Reviews This published publication is excellent. This really is for all who statte there had not been a well worth studying. I am very happy to inform you that this is the very best ebook i have read through within my very own daily life and could be he greatest pdf for possibly. (Mrs. Maybelle Gleason DDS) DISCLAIMER | DMCA 9DVKDBFGFAWD # Book Telluride, Silverton, Ouray, Lake City: Colorado, USA TELLURIDE, SILVERTON, OURAY, LAKE CITY: COLORADO, USA National Geographic Maps, United States, 2010. Sheet map, folded. Book Condition: New. Revised. 183 x 97 mm. Language: English . Brand New Book. Waterproof Tear-Resistant Topographic MapExpertly researched and created in partnership with local land management agencies, National Geographic s Trails Illustrated map of Telluride, Silverton, Ouray, and Lake City provides an unparalleled tool for exploring this breathtaking region of Colorado. Whatever the season, you ll find this map a useful tool in pursuing a host of recreational activities from skiing, snowmobiling, and ice climbing to camping, fishing, mountain biking, and ATVing. The map also includes information about these featured attractions: Uncompahgre Wilderness, Alpine Loop National Scenic Byway, Lizard Head Wilderness, Ridgway State Park, Mount Sneels Wilderness, and San Juan Skyway National Scenic Byway.This map can guide you o the beaten path and back again with miles of mapped trails including the Colorado Trail and the Continental Divide Trail. The map base includes contour lines and elevations for summits and passes. Recreation features such as campgrounds, boat launches, and fishing access are clearly noted, and contact information for various agencies is included as well.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Pesca En Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020
    C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 Pesca en Colorado TEMPORADA: 1 DE ABRIL DE 2019–31 DE MARZO DE 2020 cpw.state.co.us CARACTERÍSTICAS EN LÍNEA Echa un vistazo a más Colorado Parks & Wildlife en nuestros canales: VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEOS HERMAN GULCH GREENBACK CUTTHROAT TROUT RECOVERY (RECUPERACIÓN DE TRUCHAS DEGOLLADAS GREENBACK DE HERMAN GULCH) OUT OF WATER: STOCKING NATIVE TROUT IN ALPINE LAKES (FUERA DEL AGUA: ALMACENAMIENTO DE TRUCHAS NATIVAS EN LAGOS ALPINOS) CPW’S WINTER OBTENER LA APP DE STOCKING PROGRAM CPW FISHING: (PROGRAMA DE INVIERNO DE CPW) ¡Descubra más de 1,300 lugares de pesca, HOW TO FILLET A FISH verifique el clima y las (COMO FILETEAR UN PESCADO) condiciones del agua, lea las regulaciones y más! © Vic Schendel CONTENIDO Impreso para distribución gratuita por TABLA DE CONTENIDO COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE (CPW) 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216 ■ 303-297-1192 NOVEDADES: 2019 ................................................ 1 cpw.state.co.us LICENCIAS E INFORMACIÓN ............................... 1–2 NUESTRA MISIÓN: La misión de Colorado Parks and Wildlife es perpetuar los recursos ■ Tasas de licencias y Habitat Stamps ..............................................................1 de vida silvestre del estado, proporcinar un sistema de parques estatales de calidad y brindar oportunidades divertidas y sostenibles de recreación al aire libre que ■ Información de Habitat Stamp ......................................................................1 Avisos de salud ..............................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update
    Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Hinsdale County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Update November 2019 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background and Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Multi-Jurisdictional Planning ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 SECTION 2 – COMMUNITY PROFILE ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 History .....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • High Country Conservation Advocates the Wilderness Society Center
    High Country Conservation Advocates ● The Wilderness Society ● Center for Biological Diversity ● Rocky Smith ● EcoFlight ● Great Old Broads for Wilderness ● Rocky Mountain Wild ● Colorado Native Plant Society ● Rocky Mountain Recreation Initiative ● Wild Connections ● Quiet Use Coalition ● Central Colorado Wilderness Coalition ● San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council November 18, 2019 Brian Stevens Team Leader BLM Gunnison Field Office 210 West Spencer Ave., Suite A Gunnison, CO 81230 Via email to [email protected] Re: North Powderhorn Fuels Project Dear Mr. Stevens: The following are the comments of High Country Conservation Advocates (HCCA), The Wilderness Society, Center for Biological Diversity, Rocky Smith, EcoFlight, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Rocky Mountain Wild, Colorado Native Plant Society, Rocky Mountain Recreation Initiative, Wild Connections, Quiet Use Coalition, Central Colorado Wilderness Coalition, Center for Biological Diversity, and San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council on the proposed North Powderhorn Fuels Project, as described in the Scoping Letter (SL) of October 18, 2019 and the Draft Proposed Action and Alternatives (DPAA). HCCA is located in Crested Butte, Colorado and has over 900 members. HCCA was founded in 1977 to protect the health and natural beauty of the land, rivers, and wildlife in and around Gunnison County now and for future generations. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. We may be able to support Alternative C should the agency provide more information clearly indicating that treatments outside of the wilderness and WSAs could be justified and, with mitigation, be acceptable.1 We could also support an alternative that allows non-motorized prescribed burning in ponderosa stands within the Powderhorn Wilderness and Wilderness Study Areas, if such treatments would result in treated areas resembling what would exist if natural fire disturbances had been allowed to occur.
    [Show full text]