Benjamin Rush

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benjamin Rush Bleeding by the numbers Benjamin Rush Andrew G. Shuman, MD, Marc Edelman, JD, MA, and Joseph J. Fins, MD Dr. Shuman (AΩA, University of Michigan, 2004) was/ British journalist in post-Revolutionary America. Cobbett’s is a fellow in the Division of Medical Ethics at Weill Cornell literary foil and adversary was none other than the famous Medical College. He is currently assistant professor of Philadelphia physician and patriot, Benjamin Rush, who inad- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and faculty in the vertently became the focus of one of the earliest applications Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine at the of biostatistics in the history of medicine. University of Michigan Medical School. Mr. Edelman is asso- During the 1793 Philadelphia yellow fever epidemic, Rush ciate professor of Law at Zicklin School of Business, Baruch made liberal and publicly-touted use of bloodletting, which College, City University of New York. Dr. Fins (AΩA, Weill Cobbett argued was both dangerous and did not reduce the Cornell Medical College, 2011) is the E. William Davis Jr. MD death rate. After losing a libel suit to Rush, Cobbett defended Professor of Medical Ethics; chief of the Division of Medical himself with a novel weapon—data—and unwittingly opened Ethics; professor of Medicine, Public Health, and Medicine in the door to the modern concept of public health epidemiology. Psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College; and adjunct fac- Despite having the numbers and facts on his side, Cobbett’s ulty at the Rockefeller University. legacy is largely relegated to a historical footnote, whereas Rush’s continued support of bloodletting likely contributed to he emergence of statistics within the field of medicine many preventable deaths well into the nineteenth century. The is commonly traced to the French physician Pierre story is further enriched by its historical setting and political Charles Alexandre Louis, who, beginning in the 1820s, climate, challenging freedom of the press while the ink on the Tapplied a “numerical method” to determine whether bloodlet- Bill of Rights was still moist. ting effectively treated infections and fevers.1 A surprising predecessor to Louis was William Cobbett, a rabble-rousing 10 The Pharos/Autumn 2014 Rush versus Cobbett Bleeding by the numbers Illustration by Erica Aitken William Cobbett The protagonists president. He gained further notoriety when disease invaded Dr. Benjamin Rush remains one of the best known Philadelphia. American physicians of his time. The son of a local gun- In 1793, a virulent yellow fever epidemic wreaked havoc on smith, Rush signed the Declaration of Independence and Philadelphia, killing up to one-tenth of the city’s population. A later served as Chief Physician of the Revolutionary Army, disease with a variable clinical course and no definitive treat- and enjoyed international acclaim and esteem as a physician ment even today, physicians at the time were nearly helpless. and educator.2 After graduating from the College of New The etiology, a mosquito-borne virus, along with effective pre- Jersey (now Princeton University), Rush apprenticed with vention strategies, would not be discovered for over a century. a local physician before graduating from medical school in In the absence of scientific evidence, public health debates be- 1768 with the financial assistance of Benjamin Franklin.3 came intertwined with politics—“contagionists” believed yellow According to one student, Rush had a “voice, sweeter than fever was a communicable disease and generally sided with the a flute, [that] fell on [one’s] ears like droppings from a sanc- Federalists such as John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, while tuary . with his earnest, most sincere, most persuasive “anti-contagionists,” on the other hand, favored environmental accents, sunk so deep into my heart that neither time nor etiologies and tended to be Jeffersonian Republicans.5 change could eradicate.” 4 Rush was reform-minded, peti- Rush combated the yellow fever epidemic with his char- tioning for the abolition of slavery, education of women, acteristic fervor, converting his home into a hospital and and improvement of prisons. He was also a prolific writer seeing over a hundred patients daily.3 The idea for aggressive who authored the first essay in American history advocat- bloodletting, the crux of his treatment, was based on a medical ing for an entirely public school system, and boasted about publication from the 1740s given to him by none other than his writing the first article promoting George Washington for patron, Benjamin Franklin.6 By trial and error, Rush settled on The Pharos/Autumn 2014 11 Benjamin Rush by Richard W. Dodson. © Stapleton Collection/CORBIS a treatment regimen involving “depletion theory,” consisting of aggressive bleeding coupled with a mercury-based purgative.7 Convinced of its effectiveness, he publicized his treatment in newspapers and in impassioned pleas to medical colleagues, and intensely criticized physicians who spoke out against his ideas. The professional debate was relayed in communica- tions between Henry Knox, Secretary of War, to President Washington: “The different opinions of treatment incite great inquietude . But Rush bears down all before him.” 7 Doctor practicing bloodletting on a patient by artist James As both mercury-based purgatives and bloodletting were Gillray. © Historical Picture Archive/CORBIS very much a component of standard medical practice, it was these therapies’ applicability to yellow fever, the concordant use of aggressive emetics, and the sheer volume of blood removed physician himself, offered less than generous appraisals of that set Rush apart from his peers.8 A partial explanation for Rush’s contributions to the field: “In the whole vast compass the aggressiveness of Rush’s regimen involves his gross miscal- of medical literature, there cannot be found an equal number culation of the normal adult human blood volume, which he of pages containing a greater amount of utter nonsense and projected at twice the correct figure.6 unqualified absurdities.” 12 In fact, Rush applied his anecdotal Empiric study would eventually bring into question the prac- experiences with bleeding as a panacea for yellow fever widely, tice of routine bloodletting. To Rush’s credit, however, he did espousing the theory that all significant illnesses resulted from make substantive advances in the realm of public health with increased vascular tension that could be resolved with aggres- respect to yellow fever. His assertion that the disease was not sive bloodletting.10 This fallacy, popularized by his spirited transmitted among humans and his willingness to remain with rhetoric and prolific writings espousing the dangerous practice, the infirm served as a powerful example of medical profession- spread significantly throughout the global medical community, alism; moreover, while the insect vector would not be identified and was applied by his trainees along the eastern seaboard as until the twentieth century, his efforts to improve hygiene have late as the 1840s.10 been lauded.9 Rush urged the mayor of the city to establish William Cobbett, a British ex-marine and journalist resid- hospitals for management of the indigent.7 His memoir of the ing in Philadelphia, was an unlikely opponent. Cobbett had epidemic provided a personal and riveting account of the ill- received little formal education, but taught himself grammar ness and its effect upon the population.10 In addition, his sheer and literature.13 After the American Revolution, Cobbett settled determination and work ethic throughout the epidemic of 1793 in Philadelphia and assumed the pseudonym Peter Porcupine, were highly praised.11 writing the popular Porcupine’s Gazette. A loyal Briton active in Even though there were few satisfactory alternatives to American politics, Cobbett bitterly opposed the Republicans, Rush’s practice of bloodletting to treat yellow fever, some con- lending grudging support to Alexander Hamilton and the tend that Rush managed to “severely retard medical progress for Federalists.14 Cobbett’s writings were popular as both enter- almost fifty years after his death.” 4 Elisha Barlett, a renowned tainment and a source of news. Abigail Adams appreciated his 12 The Pharos/Autumn 2014 Portrait of William Cobbett by J.R.Smith. © Bettman/CORBIS work, commenting that Cobbett’s “shafts are always tipt with of his many barbs, Cobbett continued the Biblical metaphor: wit, and his humor is such as frequently to excite more of good “The Israelite slew his thousands, but the Rushites have slain than ill.” 15p8–9 Meanwhile, George Washington also offered their tens of thousands,” 20p131 followed by “The times are omi- guarded praise, despite his concern that the works contained nous indeed,/When quack to quack cries, Purge and bleed.” 20p167 “strong and coarse expressions” and “a want of official informa- In another broadside, Rush was given unholy company: “a mus- tion on many facts.” 15p18 quito, a horse-leech, a ferret, a pole cat, a weazel: for these are Cobbett ultimately chose Benjamin Rush as his main tar- all bleeders and understand their business full as well as Doctor get. While not the first to criticize Rush (Knox, Hamilton, and Rush does his.” 21pp288–89 others had already done so), Cobbett may have been the most The pamphlets were influential. In a personal letter in which acerbic. In Cobbett’s words, Rush “seized, with uncommon he disclosed his intent to file a legal suit, Rush admitted that alacrity
Recommended publications
  • Rush Family Papers Rush Finding Aid Prepared by Finding Aid Prepared by Holly Mengel
    Rush family papers Rush Finding aid prepared by Finding aid prepared by Holly Mengel. Last updated on September 02, 2020. Library Company of Philadelphia Rush family papers Table of Contents Summary Information....................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 7 Administrative Information......................................................................................................................... 14 Related Materials......................................................................................................................................... 15 Controlled Access Headings........................................................................................................................15 Other Finding Aids note..............................................................................................................................17 Collection Inventory.................................................................................................................................... 18 Series I. Benjamin Rush papers...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY John Swanwick: Spokesman for "Merchant-Republicanism ' In Philadelphia, 1790-179 8 HE literature on the era of Jeffersonian democracy is largely- dominated by the great triumvirate of Thomas Jefferson, TJames Madison, and Albert Gallatin.* During the last dec- ade, however, historians have been paying more attention to state and local political leaders who played significant roles in the Demo- cratic-Republican movement.1 Among the more notable second-rank * In a somewhat abbreviated form this article was presented as a paper at the annual meeting of the Pennsylvania Historical Association held at Williamsport, Pa., on Oct. 22-23, 1971. The author wishes to express his gratitude to his colleague, Bernard Sternsher, for his helpful editorial suggestions. 1 Historians have given most of their attention to secondary Federalists, but since i960 the number of modern scholarly biographies of less prominent Republicans has increased. We now have first-rate biographies on Robert R. Livingston, David Rittenhouse, Aaron Burr, Daniel D. Tompkins, John Breckinridge, Luther Martin, Benjamin Rush (2), Samuel Smith, and James Monroe. There are also a number of good unpublished doctoral dissertations. Among the more notable studies are those on Elkanah Watson, Simon Snyder, Mathew Carey, Samuel Latham Mitchell, Melancton Smith, Levi Woodbury, William Lowndes, William Duane, William Jones (2), Eleazer Oswald, Thomas McKean, Levi Lincoln, Ephraim Kirby, and John Nicholson. Major biographies of Tench Coxe by Jacob E. Cooke, of John Beckley by Edmund Berkeley, and of Thomas McKean by John M. Coleman and Gail Stuart Rowe are now in progress. 131 132 ROLAND M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hamitic Hypothesis; Its Origin and Functions in Time Perspective Author(S): Edith R
    The Hamitic Hypothesis; Its Origin and Functions in Time Perspective Author(s): Edith R. Sanders Source: The Journal of African History, Vol. 10, No. 4 (1969), pp. 521-532 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/179896 . Accessed: 08/05/2014 00:32 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of African History. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Journal of African History, x, 4 (I969), pp. 521-532 521 Printed in Great Britain THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS; ITS ORIGIN AND FUNCTIONS IN TIME PERSPECTIVE1 BY EDITH R. SANDERS THE Hamitic hypothesis is well-known to students of Africa. It states that everything of value ever found in Africa was brought there by the Hamites, allegedlya branchof the Caucasianrace. Seligmanformulates it as follows: Apart from relatively late Semitic influence... the civilizationsof Africa are the civilizations of the
    [Show full text]
  • Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2003 Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide Eileen Robin Hintz College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hintz, Eileen Robin, "Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide" (2003). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626412. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ehge-1b89 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFORM, RADICALISM, AND ROYALTY: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Eileen Hintz 2003 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Eileen Hintz Approved by the Committee, December 2003 _ ___ James McCord Chandos Brown ff — Gilbert McArthur TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v ABSTRACT vi INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. THE DEATH OF PRINCESS CHARLOTTE [NOVEMBER 1817] 6 CHAPTER II.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. James Durham, ^Mysterious 8Ighteenth-Century 'Black 'Physician: *Man Or Zmyth?
    Dr. James Durham, ^Mysterious 8ighteenth-Century 'Black 'Physician: *Man or zMyth? ITTLE is known about him, not even the year of his birth for certain, though it is believed to be 1762, while the date of his I-« death is even more elusive. No record of it has been found. Yet, James Durham, who was born a slave in Philadelphia, has been called America's first black physician;1 for several years he practiced medicine in New Orleans; and he was a friend and corre- spondent of Benjamin Rush, America's best-known physician and medical scientist of that day. But John Duffy, a leading authority on the history of medicine, and the acknowledged authority on the history of medicine in Louisiana, has bluntly written: "This illustri- ous black physician may have practiced in Philadelphia or in some other city—but not in New Orleans."2 Duffy bases this statement upon the fact that Spanish records for the period when Durham was in New Orleans make no mention of a Dr. Durham, and the Spanish were very meticulous about the examination and licensing of physicians. On the other hand, Duffy concedes that those same records do mention "a free black called 'Derum/ " who, not having completed the regular examinations, had "the right only to cure throat disease and no other."3 It is true that down through the years the story of this black 1 See, e.g., Richard Bardolph, The Negro Vanguard (New York, 1961), 30, and Peter M. Bergman, The Chronological History of the Negro in America (New York, 1969), 41.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics As Art in the Reign of George IV Author(S): Thomas W
    The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics as Art in the Reign of George IV Author(s): Thomas W. Laqueur Source: The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Sep., 1982), pp. 417-466 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1906228 Accessed: 06-03-2020 19:28 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Modern History This content downloaded from 130.132.173.181 on Fri, 06 Mar 2020 19:28:02 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics as Art in the Reign of George IV* Thomas W. Laqueur University of California, Berkeley Seldom has there been so much commotion over what appears to be so little as in the Queen Caroline affair, the agitation on behalf of a not- very-virtuous queen whose still less virtuous husband, George IV, want- ed desperately to divorce her. During much of 1820 the "queen's busi- ness" captivated the nation. "It was the only question I have ever known," wrote the radical critic William Hazlitt, "that excited a thor- ough popular feeling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republican Theology of Benjamin Rush
    THE REPUBLICAN THEOLOGY OF BENJAMIN RUSH By DONALD J. D'ELIA* A Christian [Benjamin Rush argued] cannot fail of be- ing a republican. The history of the creation of man, and of the relation of our species to each other by birth, which is recorded in the Old Testament, is the best refuta- tion that can be given to the divine right of kings, and the strongest argument that can be used in favor of the original and natural equality of all mankind. A Christian, I say again, cannot fail of being a republican, for every precept of the Gospel inculcates those degrees of humility, self-denial, and brotherly kindness, which are directly opposed to the pride of monarchy and the pageantry of a court. D)R. BENJAMIN RUSH was a revolutionary in his concep- tions of history, society, medicine, and education. He was also a revolutionary in theology. His age was one of universality, hle extrapolated boldly from politics to religion, or vice versa, with the clear warrant of the times.1 To have treated religion and politics in isolation from each other would have clashed with his analogical disposition, for which he was rightly famous. "Dr. D'Elia is associate professor of history at the State University of New York College at New Paltz. This paper was read at a session of the annual meeting of the Association at Meadville, October 9, 1965. 1Basil Willey, The Eighteenth Century Background; Studies on the Idea of Nature in the Thought of the Period (Boston: Beacon Press, 1961), p. 137 et passim.
    [Show full text]
  • Romantic Ireland
    Romantic Ireland Romantic Ireland: From Tone to Gonne; Fresh Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Ireland Edited by Paddy Lyons, Willy Maley and John Miller Romantic Ireland: From Tone to Gonne; Fresh Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Ireland, Edited by Paddy Lyons, Willy Maley and John Miller This book first published 2013 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2013 by Paddy Lyons, Willy Maley and John Miller and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4420-9, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4420-8 for Katie Gough who raised the tone and kept us going Romantic Ireland’s dead and gone, It’s with O’Leary in the grave. (WB Yeats, ‘September 1913’) CONTENTS PART I: HISTORY Part I Introduction ........................................................................................ 3 Paddy Lyons, John Miller and Willy Maley I. Class, Colonialism, and Republicanism Chapter One ............................................................................................... 10 Foreseeing the Famine?: William Cobbett’s Irish Writings Alex Benchimol Chapter Two .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICAL THOUGHT of BENJAMIN RUSH by PAUL FRANK
    THE POLITICAL THOUGHT OF BENJAMIN RUSH By PAUL FRANK ,,LAMBERT Bachelor of Arts in Education East Central State College Ada, Oklahoma 1968 S~bmitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1971 THE POLITICAL THOUGHT OF BENJAMIN RUSH Thesis Approved : ii PREFACE This thesis is concerned with illustrating and examining the political thought of Dr. Benjamin Rush of Philadelphia. Rush, the ·' most famous Anierican physician of his day, moved within the circle of such men as George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, and n~merous other luminaries of that era. Furthermore, his adult life spanned the period from the Stamp Act Crisis of 1765 to the War of 1812. His importance notwithstanding, Ru~h has not been studied thoroughly by historians, and his political thought is only one facet of this versatile and i;ignificant individual t;hat has been neglected. Many people come to mind while contemplating the debts of grati­ tude I owe regarding this thesis. Some were not immediately involved in the project. In this category, I must include my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Floyd Lambert of Tishomingo, Oklahoma, whose encouragement over the years has been instrumental in my educational achievements to date. Thanks is also due a number of professors, both at East Central State College, Ada, Oklahoma, and at Oklahoma State University, who have inspired me to further my professional training. A special acknowledgment should also be extended to the staff of the Oklahoma State Vniversity Library for their willing assistance in my research p~oblems.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Alien Acts, 1793-1826
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1978 The English Alien Acts, 1793-1826 David LuVerne Ferch College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Ferch, David LuVerne, "The English Alien Acts, 1793-1826" (1978). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625034. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-jrbe-hr82 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ENGLISH ALIEN ACTS 1793 - 1826? A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the.Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by David Ferch 1978 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, August 1978 aAies N . McCord Dale E. Hoak o Thomas F. Sheppard 11 692 4 2 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT iv INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. THE ORIGIN OF THE FIRST ALIEN ACT, 1792-93 6 CHAPTER II. WAR AND THE REGULATION OF ALIENS, 1793-98 30 CHAPTER III. THE ALIENS PROBLEM, 1798-1814 58 CHAPTER IV. ALIENS LEGISLATION IN TIME OF PEACE, 1814-26 80 CONCLUSION 119 BIBLIOGRAPHY 135 iii ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to examine the English Alien Acts in the context of the political and social history of England* In a series of acts passed between 1793 and 1826, Parliament granted the executive government broad powers of regulation over the nation's resident foreign population.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Era
    CATALOGUE THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN The Federal Era WILLIAM REESE COMPANY 409 Temple Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 789-8081 A Note This catalogue is devoted to the two decades from the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783 to the first Jefferson administration and the Louisiana Purchase, usually known to scholars as the Federal era. It saw the evolution of the United States from the uncertainties of the Confederation to the establishment of the Constitution and first federal government in 1787-89, through Washington’s two administrations and that of John Adams, and finally the Jeffersonian revolution of 1800 and the dramatic expansion of the United States. Notable items include a first edition of The Federalist; a collection of the treaties ending the Revolutionary conflict (1783); the first edition of the first American navigational guide, by Furlong (1796); the Virginia Resolutions of 1799; various important cartographical works by Norman and Mount & Page; a first edition of Benjamin’s Country Builder’s Assistant (1797); a set of Carey’s American Museum; and much more. Our catalogue 338 will be devoted to Western Americana. Available on request or via our website are our recent catalogues 331 Archives & Manuscripts, 332 French Americana, 333 Americana–Beginnings, 334 Recent Acquisitions in Americana, and 336 What I Like About the South; bulletins 41 Original Works of American Art, 42 Native Americans, 43 Cartography, and 44 Photography; e-lists (only available on our website) and many more topical lists. q A portion of our stock may be viewed at www.williamreesecompany.com. If you would like to receive e-mail notification when catalogues and lists are uploaded, please e-mail us at [email protected] or send us a fax, specifying whether you would like to receive the notifications in lieu of or in addition to paper catalogues.
    [Show full text]